DOCSLIB.ORG

Diet, Spatial Ecology and Energetics of Echidnas: the Significance of Habitat and Seasonal Variation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diet, Spatial Ecology and Energetics of Echidnas: the Significance of Habitat and Seasonal Variation Diet, spatial ecology and energetics of echidnas: the significance of habitat and seasonal variation Jennifer Anne Sprent BSc (Hons), University of Tasmania Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February, 2012 Declaration of originality I hereby declare that this thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any tertiary institute, and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material the infringes copyright. Jenny Sprent February 29th, 2012 Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Jenny Sprent February 29th, 2012 ii Statement regarding published work contained in thesis The publishers of the paper comprising Chapters 5a hold the copyright for that content, and access to the material should be sought from the respective journals. The remaining non published content of the thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Jenny Sprent February 29th, 2011 Statement of Ethical Conduct The research associated with this thesis abides by the international and Australian codes on human and animal experimentation, the guidelines by the Australian Government's Office of the Gene Technology Regulator and the rulings of the Safety, Ethics and Institutional Biosafety Committees of the University. Jenny Sprent February 29th, 2011 iii Statement of publication and co-authorship The following people and institutions contributed to the publication of the work undertaken as part of this thesis: Paper 1: Latrine use by the short-beaked echidna, Tachyglossus aculeatus. Australian Mammalogy Candidate (50%), author 1 (Niels Andersen) (25%), author 2 (Stewart Nicol)(25%) Details of the Authors roles: Authors 1 and 2 contributed to the concept and planning of the study, and to data collection. Author 2 assisted with data analysis. We the undersigned agree with the above stated “proportion of work undertaken” for the above published peer-reviewed manuscript contributing to this thesis: Signed: __________________ ______________________ Stewart Nicol Elissa Cameron Supervisor Head of School School of Zoology School of Zoology University of Tasmania University of Tasmania Date:_____________________ iv The following people contributed to the research undertaken as part of this thesis Stewart Nicol (School of Zoology, University of Tasmania) provided guidance on data collection and assistance with statistical analysis and provided constructive criticism of data analysis, interpretation of results and chapter drafts. Sue Jones (School of Zoology, University of Tasmania) supervised my radioimmunoassay work (Chapter 2) and provided constructive criticism of data analysis, interpretation of results and drafts of all chapters. Niels Andersen (School of Medicine, University of Tasmania) provided field assistance and guidance on data collection (Chapters 2, 3, 4 and 5) and constructive criticism of data analysis, interpretation of results and chapter drafts (Chapters 5a). Rob Gasperini (Menzies Research Institute) performed western blot analysis of leptin (Chapter 2) Craig Mundy (TAFI, University of Tasmania) calculated home range estimates in R and converted them into a format suitable for use in a GIS (Chapter 4). Mark Hovenden and Mike Perring (School of Plant Science, University of Tasmania) calculated pasture productivity at Lovely Banks (Chapter 6). This thesis is based on field data collected by me in the period of August 2004 to October 2010, but also included data collected as part of a long term project of echidna field biology which was started in 1997. A small number of additional data collected by other researchers has been included in the data analysis for Chapter 2 - Seasonal variation in circulating leptin concentrations and body mass in free ranging short beaked echidnas (Tachyglossus aculeatus) and Chapter 4 - The influence of habitat type on the home range size of the short beaked echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus). v Abstract Abstract The ant- and termite-eating echidna is a solitary, monotreme mammal with a highly seasonal life history. I investigated several aspects of the seasonal energetics and ecology of free-ranging echidnas: the role of leptin in the annual mass cycle, seasonal and habitat effects on diet, the relationship between home range size and habitat quality, and the effect of habitat on the siting of echidna latrines. The echidna has a large seasonal variation in fat stores, which reach their maximum prior to hibernation. I hypothesised that the hormone leptin would have the same role in the echidna as in eutherian hibernators, i.e. that there would be a direct relationship between body mass and plasma leptin that would change to allow pre-hibernatory fattening. I found significant seasonal variations in plasma leptin, with the highest levels occurring in hibernation and in females during mating. The lowest levels were found in males after the reproductive period. Rather than the expected strong positive relationship between adiposity and plasma leptin I found a weak negative relationship, similar to that in reptiles and birds. To determine if there was any significant seasonal variation in diet associated with pre- hibernatory fattening I investigated diet using scat and stable isotope analysis. Echidna scats consisted largely of ants and the larvae of pasture cockchafer beetles. There was significant seasonal variation in percent occurrence of larvae, but not in the ant species found in scats or in the stable isotopic composition of echidna plasma. Although there was no difference in the prey items that contributed most to scat contents of animals living in different habitats, stable isotope analysis of blood showed a highly significant effect of habitat type on δ15N. Female echidnas showed a significant negative relationship between the proportion of woodland habitat and home range size, whereas there was no such relationship for males, which had significantly larger home ranges. My data suggest that female home range is scaled to available resources, while male home range is probably scaled to maximise access to females. The role of latrines and their relationship to habitat was examined by a detailed survey of part of the field site, where many echidna home ranges were known to overlap. Latrines were located more frequently in scrub than in pasture or thick bush and the highest frequency of latrines occurred where there were two home ranges that overlapped. Latrines may be important in the spatial organisation of echidnas. viiv Acknowledgments Acknowledgements Firstly my heartfelt thanks must go to my supervisor Stewart Nicol. Your comments, suggestions and guidance have greatly improved the quality of my work over the years, and your enthusiasm, encouragement and assistance were a major driving force in getting this thesis completed, especially in the last few painful months. Thanks to my co- supervisor Sue Jones for taking an active interest in my research, for your constructive comments and suggestions. Special thanks from pregnant me, and unborn Hamish, for running one of my radioimmunoassays for me when I was pregnant. Peter McQullian provided an enormous amount of information about pasture grubs, ants and how to identify them. Peter you are a mine of information, and whenever I got to opportunity to discuss my work with you I always came away with some great ideas. A large number of people assisted me throughout my project. I am most grateful to Niels Andersen for all his help in the field. Thanks for your company when driving around on the hunt for echidnas, as well as for your patience whilst I mastered the art of radio tracking and anesthetising echidnas. I won’t miss your stinky sandwiches though! Thanks to office mates and fellow postgraduates Gemma Morrow and Rachel Harris for help and company during field work as well as providing support, encouragement, advice and cupcakes. I am indebted to Rob Gasperini for advice about, and running the western blot for me, as well as attempting to explain what on earth it was all about. The GIS part of this work would have not been possible without help and advice from Arko Lucieer, Pip Bricher and Stephen Harwin, and I am most grateful to Craig Mundy for plugging my data into his R script, and thus allowing me to escape the tyranny of R. Much needed, and appreciated, statistical advice was provided by David Ratkowsky. Thank you to owners of Lovely Banks, the McShane family, for allowing access to our field site and the echidnas that inhabit it. A generous donation of two GPS logger units from NewBehavior in Switzerland made trialling the attaching GPS loggers to echidnas possible. Dick Bashford at Forestry Tasmania was kind enough to allow me to look at the Lowery ant collection. vii Acknowledgments Thank you to Dad, Chris and Mum for your continued support and interest in my work. Dad thank you for all that time you spent designing and machining the various bits and pieces that held GPS loggers onto echidnas, and Chris and Mum – thank you for being the best Granny/Gramma a little boy could wish for. It certainly made it easier going to uni knowing that Hamish loves spending his days with you. Finally thanks to Chris and Hamish for your love, support and above all, tolerance. I dedicate this work to you because without you it never would have been possible. Thanks you for your unwavering confidence in my ability to complete this, especially in those dark moments when I was awash with self-doubt. Now it is all over I can a) stop stressing, b) stop working most of the night and be part of the family again and c) get a job and start paying some bills (hopefully).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Eltham Copper Butterfly Paralucia Pyrodiscus Lucida Crosby (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): Local Versus State Conservation Strategies in Victoria
    Invertebrate Conservation Issue The Eltham Copper Butterfly Paralucia pyrodiscus lucida Crosby (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae): local versus state conservation strategies in Victoria AA Canzano,1, 3 TR New1 and Alan L Yen2 1Department of Zoology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086 2Department of Primary Industries, 621 Burwood Highway, Knoxfield, Victoria 3156 3Corresponding author Abstract This paper summarises some aspects of the practical conservation needs of the Eltham Copper Butterfly Paralucia pyrodiscus lucida, a small threatened subspecies of butterfly endemic to Victoria, Australia. The butterfly is located in three disjunct regions, separated by hundreds of kilo- metres across the state as a result of habitat removal and degradation. The three areas of ECB occur- rence each have distinct characteristics affecting the needs and intensity of conservation manage- ment on the various sites given their urban, regional and rural settings. Butterfly populations have been monitored nearly every year since 1988 with the active support of volunteers, ‘Friends of Eltham Copper Butterfly’, local councils and government agencies. This information has contributed to a more holistic management regime for the butterfly, and further research aims to elucidate the more intricate details of the butterfly’s biology, to continue to refine the current monitoring process across the state of Victoria. (The Victorian Naturalist 124 (4), 2007, 236-242) Introduction The Eltham Copper Butterfly Paralucia nests by day, around the base of the food pyrodiscus
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Trade Operation Proposal – Queen of Ants
    Wildlife Trade Operation Proposal – Queen of Ants 1. Title and Introduction 1.1/1.2 Scientific and Common Names Please refer to Attachment A, outlining the ant species subject to harvest and the expected annual harvest quota, which will not be exceeded. 1.3 Location of harvest Harvest will be conducted on privately owned land, non-protected public spaces such as footpaths, roads and parks in Victoria and from other approved Wildlife Trade Operations. Taxa not found in Victoria will be legally sourced from other approved WTOs or collected by Queen of Ants’ representatives from unprotected areas. This may include public spaces such as roadsides and unprotected council parks, and other property privately owned by the representatives. 1.4 Description of what is being harvested Please refer to Attachment A for an outline of the taxa to be harvested. The harvest is of live adult queen ants which are newly mated. 1.5 Is the species protected under State or Federal legislation Ants are non-listed invertebrates and are as such unprotected under Victorian and other State Legislation. Under Federal legislation the only protection to these species relates to the export of native wildlife, which this application seeks to satisfy. No species listed under the EPBC Act as threatened (excluding the conservation dependent category) or listed as endangered, vulnerable or least concern under Victorian legislation will be harvested. 2. Statement of general goal/aims The applicant has recently begun trading queen ants throughout Victoria as a personal hobby and has received strong overseas interest for the species of ants found.
    [Show full text]
  • Bias in the Effect of Habitat Structure on Pitfall Traps: an Experimental Evaluation
    Australian Journal of Ecology (1999) 24, 228–239 Bias in the effect of habitat structure on pitfall traps: An experimental evaluation BRETT A. MELBOURNE Division of Botany and Zoology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia ([email protected]) Abstract Habitat structure has been implicated as a source of bias for pitfall-trap data but most evidence is observational or anecdotal. This study used an experimental approach to quantify biases due to habitat structure. In a randomized block design, I manipulated native grassland to create three types of habitat structure and measured pitfall-trap catches of grassland ants. Small patches of modified habitat were surrounded by otherwise unmodified grassland with the assumption that population density remained unaffected by the modification and that the effects observed were due to changes in trappability. I assessed magnitude, direction, predictability, and consistency of bias for the following types of data: population abundance for single species, relative abundance among species, species composition of assemblages, and species richness. The magnitude of the bias in population abundance was large for most species. However, since the direction of the bias varied predictably with habitat structure, pitfall- trap data can be used to judge differences in population abundance in some situations. The magnitude of the bias in relative abundance was less than for abundance. However, there was inconsistency in the direction and magnitude of bias among species. Thus, interpretation of relative abundance data in pitfall-trap studies may be compromised. Species richness and species composition were biased by habitat structure but were affected significantly only when the groundcover was very dense, suggesting a threshold effect of habitat structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Photo Editor
    Environmental research on the impact of bumblebees in Australia and facilitation of national communication for and against further introductions Kaye Hergstrom Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallery Project Number: VG99033 VG99033 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the vegetable industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of the vegetable industry and Hydroponic Farmers Federation. All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 0532 0 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 1 50 Carrington Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 E-Mail: [email protected] © Copyright 2002 Environmental Research on the Impact of Bumblebees in Australia and Facilitation of National Communication for/against Further Introduction Prepared by Kaye Hergstrom1, Roger Buttermore1, Owen Seeman2 and Bruce McCorkell2 1Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, 40 Macquarie St, Hobart Tas., 2Department of Primary Industries, Water and the Environment, Tas. 13 St Johns Ave, New Town, Tas. Horticulture Australia Project No: VG99033 The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support provided by: Horticulture Australia Additional support in kind has been provided by: The Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Front cover illustration by Mike Tobias; design by Lexi Clark Any recommendations contained in this publication do not necessarily represent current HRDC policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    Zootaxa 3955 (2): 283–290 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3955.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:97FCBEF2-E95E-47A8-A959-408241A2574D A review of the ant genus Myrmecorhynchus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) S.O. SHATTUCK ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Building 46, Biology Place, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA Abstract The Australian endemic ant genus Myrmecorhynchus is reviewed. The genus is known from three species (M. carteri Clark, M. emeryi André and M. nitidus Clark) which are restricted to eastern and southern Australia. Myrmecorhynchus musgravei Clark and M. rufithorax Clark are newly synonymised with M. emeryi André. All species are found in forested areas where they nest arboreally or, less commonly, in soil. Foraging occurs primarily on vegetation and tree trunks. Key words: Myrmecorhynchus, Australia, taxonomy, Formicidae Introduction Myrmecorhynchus is an endemic Australian genus, known from three species. They occur in forested areas ranging from mallee through rainforest across eastern and southern Australia. All three species are sympatric in Victoria and New South Wales, with M. emeryi extending westward to south-western Western Australia and northward to central Queensland, and with M. carteri occurring in Tasmania (Fig. 1). They are small and inconspicuous ants and are most often encountered while foraging on vegetation or tree trunks (Fig. 2). Nests are in branches, twigs and vines on shrubs or trees, or in soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Along an Elevational Gradient at Eungella in the Clarke Range, Central Queensland Coast, Australia
    RAINFOREST ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT AT EUNGELLA IN THE CLARKE RANGE, CENTRAL QUEENSLAND COAST, AUSTRALIA BURWELL, C. J.1,2 & NAKAMURA, A.1,3 Here we provide a faunistic overview of the rainforest ant fauna of the Eungella region, located in the southern part of the Clarke Range in the Central Queensland Coast, Australia, based on systematic surveys spanning an elevational gradient from 200 to 1200 m asl. Ants were collected from a total of 34 sites located within bands of elevation of approximately 200, 400, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 m asl. Surveys were conducted in March 2013 (20 sites), November 2013 and March–April 2014 (24 sites each), and ants were sampled using five methods: pitfall traps, leaf litter extracts, Malaise traps, spray- ing tree trunks with pyrethroid insecticide, and timed bouts of hand collecting during the day. In total we recorded 142 ant species (described species and morphospecies) from our systematic sampling and observed an additional species, the green tree ant Oecophylla smaragdina, at the lowest eleva- tions but not on our survey sites. With the caveat of less sampling intensity at the lowest and highest elevations, species richness peaked at 600 m asl (89 species), declined monotonically with increasing and decreasing elevation, and was lowest at 1200 m asl (33 spp.). Ant species composition progres- sively changed with increasing elevation, but there appeared to be two gradients of change, one from 200–600 m asl and another from 800 to 1200 m asl. Differences between the lowland and upland faunas may be driven in part by a greater representation of tropical and arboreal-nesting sp ecies in the lowlands and a greater representation of subtropical species in the highlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Sucrose Triggers Honeydew Preference in the Ghost Ant, Tapinoma Melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A
    Sucrose triggers honeydew preference in the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) A. M. Zhou1, 2,*, B. Q. Kuang2, Y. R. Gao2, and G. W. Liang2 Abstract Honeydew produced by hemipterans mediates mutualistic interactions between ants and hemipterans. Previous studies demonstrated that the mealybug Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) and the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) produce abundant honeydew and attract a large number of tending ants. Ghost ants, Tapinoma melanocephalum (F.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), show a significant preference for mealybug honeydew over aphid honeydew. Although many studies have indicated that the honeydew produced by hemip- terans plays an important role in ant–hemipteran interactions, we know little about what triggers ants’ foraging preferences. Our results showed that the honeydew produced by both mealybugs and aphids contained fructose, sucrose, trehalose, melezitose, raffinose, and rhamnose. There were no significant difference in the concentrations of the various sugars between mealybugs and aphids, except sucrose. Xylose was present only in mealy- bug honeydew, and glucose was present only in aphid honeydew. We also found no substantial difference in the excretion frequency and the total weight of honeydew produced per 24 h between mealybugs and aphids. Ghost ants preferred sucrose. In addition, attractiveness of sucrose solutions increased significantly with increasing concentration. These results suggest that sucrose is the trigger for ghost ants’ honeydew preference. Key Words: ant–hemipteran mutualism; sugar composition; sugar concentration Resumen La mielcilla producida por hemípteros regula las interacciones mutualistas entre las hormigas y los hemípteros. Los estudios anteriores demostraron que la cochinilla harinosa Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) y el áfido Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) producen mielcilla abundante y atraen a un gran número de hormigas que atienden.
    [Show full text]
  • Eltham Copper Butterfly (VIC)
    January 1993 Eltham copper butterfly LW0021 Leigh Ahern ISSN 1440-2106 Many Victorians will be familiar with the name Eltham Public fund-raising and policy initiatives ultimately saw Copper Butterfly, due to the significant publicity which the key parts of these properties reserved for the butterfly. has accompanied community efforts to ensure its survival Other lesser colonies still occur on community-owned land in the urban environs of Eltham and Greensborough. The Eltham Copper (Paralucia pyrodiscus lucida) is restricted to a few scattered areas in central and western Victoria (Braby et al. 1992), and is classified by the Department of Natural Resources and environment(NRE) as vulnerable (Baker-Gabb 1991). Although discovered only in 1938 at Eltham, a marked reduction in the abundance of the Eltham Copper was noted during the 1950's until, eventually, the sub-species was feared to have become extinct near Melbourne (New 1991). at a nearby linear reserve, as well as at Eltham Lower Park and at Yandell Reserve, Greensborough. Additional small colonies exist on private land in the surrounding urban area, three of these being adjacent or near to the established butterfly reserves, another two being more isolated. Other colonies are known in rural environments at Castlemaine (south of Bendigo) and in the Kiata-Salisbury The Eltham Copper Butterfly showing patternon lower surface of area (west of Dimboola). However, the public interest in wings. Its body length is 1cm and wingspan 2.5cms. the butterfly clearly springs from its situation in urban However, the discovery in 1987 of several colonies at Eltham, where local residents, supported by the wider Eltham resulted in a call from local residents and naturalist community, have vigorously expressed the view that they groups for protection of the butterfly.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Formicidae) 1 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.700.11784 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 700: 1–420 (2017)Revision of the ant genus Melophorus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.700.11784 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Revision of the ant genus Melophorus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) Brian E. Heterick1,2, Mark Castalanelli3, Steve O. Shattuck4 1 Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth WA, Australia, 6845 2 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC. WA, Australia, 6986 3 EcoDiagnostics Pty Ltd, 48 Banksia Rd, Welshpool WA 6106 4 C/o CSIRO Entomology, P. O. Box 1700, Canberra, Australia, ACT 2601 Corresponding author: Brian Heterick ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Fisher | Received 17 January 2017 | Accepted 22 June 2017 | Published 20 September 2017 http://zoobank.org/EBA43227-20AD-4CFF-A04E-8D2542DDA3D6 Citation: Heterick BE, Castalanelli M, Shattuck SO (2017) Revision of the ant genus Melophorus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 700: 1–420. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.700.11784 Abstract The fauna of the purely Australian formicine ant genus Melophorus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is revised. This project involved integrated morphological and molecular taxonomy using one mitochondrial gene (COI) and four nuclear genes (AA, H3, LR and Wg). Seven major clades were identified and are here designated as the M. aeneovirens, M. anderseni, M. biroi, M. fulvihirtus, M. ludius, M. majeri and M. potteri species-groups. Within these clades, smaller complexes of similar species were also identified and designated species-complexes. The M. ludius species-group was identified purely on molecular grounds, as the morphol- ogy of its members is indistinguishable from typical members of the M.
    [Show full text]
  • Foliage Insect Diversity in Dry Eucalypt Forests in Eastern Tasmania
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 136, 2002 17 FOLIAGE INSECT DIVERSITY IN DRY EUCALYPT FORESTS IN EASTERN TASMANIA by H.J. Elliott, R. Bashford, S.J. Jarman and M.G. Neyland (with four tables, one text-figure and two appendices) ELLIOTT, H.]., BASHFORD, R., JARMAN,S.]' & NEYLAND, M.G., 2002 (3l:xii): Foliage insect diversity in dry eucalypt forests in eastern Tasmania. Papers and Proceedings ofthe Royal Society afTasmania 136: 17-34. ISSN 0080-4703. Forestry Tasmania, 79 Melville St., Hobart, Tasmania 7000, Australia. Species numbers and composition of the insect fauna occurring on trees and shrubs were studied in dry eucalypt forests in eastern Tasmania over nine years. In all, 1164 named and putative species representing 17 orders and 157 families were collected. The bulk of the species belonged to the orders Coleoptera (28%), Hymenoptera (25%), Hemiptera (18%), Lepidoptera (14%) and Diptera (10%). Of the species collected, 388 -- about one-third -- were identified at least to genus or species level. These included 21 named species not previously listed in the Tasmanian insect fauna and 90 undescribed species. A list of 22 host plants for 171 insect species was compiled from records of 132 insect species observed feeding during the study and from previous records ofinsect/host plant associations for 39 insect species found on the study plots. Most insects were feeding on eucalypts (127 insect species) and acacias (38 species). The most widely distributed and commonly collected species were several well-known pests ofeucalypts: Gonipterus scutellatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Uraba lugens (Lepidoptera: N octuidae), Amorbus obscuricornis (Hemiptera: Coreidae), Chaetophyes compacta (Hemiptera: Machaerotidae) and Eriococcus coriaceous(Hemiptera: Eriococcidae).
    [Show full text]
  • ANONYCHOMYRMA Anguliceps. Iridomyrmex Anguliceps Forel, 1901B: 18 (Q.M.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea: Bismarck Archipelago)
    ANONYCHOMYRMA anguliceps. Iridomyrmex anguliceps Forel, 1901b: 18 (q.m.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea: Bismarck Archipelago). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Dahl, 1901: 13; Forel, 1911e: 283; Emery, 1913a: 24; Wheeler, W.M. 1935g: 35; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 188; Shattuck, 1994: 3; Bolton, 1995b: 66. angusta. Iridomyrmex angustus Stitz, 1911a: 369, fig. 15 (w.) NEW GUINEA (Papua New Guinea). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Chapman & Capco, 1951: 188; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. arcadia. Iridomyrmex arcadius Forel, 1915b: 82 (q.) AUSTRALIA (Queensland). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Taylor & Brown, 1985: 96; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. ballaratensis. Iridomyrmex itinerans var. ballaratensis Forel, 1902h: 472 (w.m.) AUSTRALIA (Victoria). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Subspecies of itinerans: Emery, 1913a: 25; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 100; Taylor, 1987a: 32; Shattuck, 1994: 6; Bolton, 1995b: 66. batesi. Iridomyrmex scrutator subsp. batesi Forel, 1911e: 283 (w.) NEW GUINEA (no state data). Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 14. Subspecies of scrutator: Stitz, 1912: 509; Emery, 1913a: 26; Donisthorpe, 1941h: 60; Chapman & Capco, 1951: 191; Shattuck, 1994: 8; Bolton, 1995b: 66. biconvexa. Iridomyrmex biconvexus Santschi, 1928e: 471 (w.) AUSTRALIA (Victoria). [Misspelled as triconvexus by Baroni Urbani, 1977e: 76.] Combination in Anonychomyrma: Shattuck, 1992a: 13. Status as species: Brown, 1954i: 67; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 97; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. Senior synonym of foetans: Brown, 1954i: 67; Taylor & Brown, 1985: 97; Taylor, 1987a: 31; Shattuck, 1994: 4; Bolton, 1995b: 66. contenta. Iridomyrmex dimorphus subsp. contenta Viehmeyer, 1913: 146 (w., in copal) INDONESIA (Sulawesi).
    [Show full text]
  • A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands South Australia in 2003
    A BIODIVERSITY SURVEY OF THE ADELAIDE PARK LANDS SOUTH AUSTRALIA IN 2003 By M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Science and Conservation Directorate Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2003 The Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia was carried out with funds made available by the Adelaide City Council. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Adelaide City Council or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Long, M. (2003). A Biodiversity Survey of the Adelaide Park Lands, South Australia in 2003 (Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Department for Human Services, Housing, Environment and Planning Library 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 AUTHOR M. Long Biological Survey and Monitoring Section, Science and Conservation Directorate, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS) ANALYSIS AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Maps: Environmental Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Environment and Heritage COVER DESIGN Public Communications and Visitor Services, Department for Environment and Heritage. PRINTED BY © Department for Environment and Heritage 2003. ISBN 0759010536 Cover Photograph: North Terrace and the River Torrens northwards to North Adelaide from the air showing some of the surrounding Adelaide Park Lands Photo: Department for Environment and Heritage ii Adelaide Park Lands Biodiversity Survey PREFACE The importance of this biodiversity survey of the Adelaide Park Lands cannot be overstated. Our Adelaide Park Lands are a unique and invaluable ‘natural’ asset.
    [Show full text]