DOCSLIB.ORG

Floodplains Pilot Coevorden, a Deliberative Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floodplains Pilot Coevorden, a Deliberative Report FLOODPLAINS PILOT COEVORDEN A DELIBERATIVE REPORT The Interreg VB C5a project promotes a more integrated and innovative solution for the effects of climate change. The Cloud-to-Coast (C2C) approach facilitates this. FLOODPLAINS PILOT COEVORDEN - A DELIBERATIVE REPORT The Interreg VB C5a project promotes a more integrated and innovative solution for the effects of climate change. The Cloud-to-Coast (C2C) approach facilitates this. Original Dutch report written by: Beatrijs Koet, Aveco de Bondt BV Translation by: Deirdre Buist-Murphy, Province of Drenthe Commissioned & supplemented by: Rinke van Veen & Leo de Vree, The Province of Drenthe Datum: 15 januari 2021 Referentie: 204187_R_BKT_0189 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 5 2 GOALS 6 3 METHOD 7 4 WORKSHOP RESULTS 9 4.1 General 10 4.2 Flooding 10 4.2.1 Local - Delta Plan Spatial Adaptation (DPRA) 10 4.2.2 Regional (NBW/LBW) 10 4.2.3 National (HWBP) 11 4.3 Drought 13 4.3.1 Local 13 4.3.2 Regional 13 4.3.3 National 14 4.4 Water Quality 14 4.4.1 Local 14 4.4.2 Regional 14 4.4.3 National 15 4.5 Social inclusion 15 4.6 Environment and recreation 16 4.7 Agriculture 16 4.8 Biodiversity, Energy and Construction 16 5 CONCLUSIONS 17 5.1 Conclusions of the workshop 17 5.2 Overview 19 5.4 C2C approach, outcomes and indicators 20 5.5 Next steps 20 APPENDIX 1 23 C5a Evaluation sheet 23 Indicators of project results 25 FIGUUR 1: SCHEMATIC VISUAL OF C2C APPROACH 4 1 INTRODUCTION Climate change leads to a significantly higher risk of flooding in the catchment area of the River Vecht and the Ijsselmeer (Ijssel Lake) in the Province of Overijssel. Flood protection measures in this region are mainly focussed on the local situation, where high waters occur. Rising water levels have led to an increase in flood plains, higher quay barriers or dikes. At the same time our changing climate leads to drought in higher grounds. Combatting measures are also being taken here. The connection between these two issues is not always recognized sufficiently. The goal of the C5a project is to promote a more integrated and innovative solution for the effects of climate change. The project aims for efficient and effective adaptation to the results of future climate-related risks. This will be done by not just looking at the physical impacts but also at the economic and social impacts on the whole water system. From this perspective, efforts are focussed on connecting the various stakeholders and policy fields to reach an integral assessment of project proposals. The Cloud-to-Coast (C2C) approach facilitates this process. The C2C approach looks at the whole system. Working inclusively and adaptively on a continuous dialogue under an umbrella parameter. New insights or results should be shared continuously. The whole water system – both local and regional - is taken into account. An adaptive working method is when more future scenarios are deliberated upon and these are considered in the results. An inclusive process allows for all the different actors involved. The C2C approach is currently being developed and tested through pilots. These pilots have been proposed by the partners in the Interreg North Sea Region project C5a. There are ten partners from six different countries with seven current pilots and the project runs from 2019-2021. In this report we deal with one of the pilots: ‘Flood plains at Coevorden – Integrated River Management’. 5 2 GOALS As mentioned in the introduction, the main goal of C5a is to integrate the different economic, social and physical/tangible aspects involved in the process with regards to effective and efficient climate adaptation. With this in mind, the C5a approach has been developed. Aim of the pilot ‘Flood Plains at Coevorden’ is two-fold, being oriented on both process and content. This pilot has been set up to test the C2C approach. Important questions: • What does this approach add to the current process in terms of retention areas? • Is there sufficient knowledge available to make the right decisions regarding the reservation and labelling of the retention areas? Conclusions need to reached per theme. 6 3 METHOD In this pilot, solutions for the water challenges in the The third part of the approach is also dealt with by area of Coevorden are being developed using the C2C adding social inclusion to the scheme. However, the approach. subject matter of the pilot does not lend itself for a A schematic overview of the various aspects is shown large citizen involvement seeing as the topic of flood in the tables below so that it is easy to verify if the plains at Coevorden is politically and environmentally C2C approach is compatible with the steps taken or if sensitive. The adopted strategy is therefore limited in there are possible gaps. The approach as described in terms of inclusion, seeing as only local, regional and the Concept Note provided no concrete step-by-step national government authorities are involved. plan for the workshop, so it was decided to divide into different levels. First steps were taken during the workshop to decide if there is enough information available regarding the By considering the different local, regional and connection between the themes and the flood plains national levels, the whole water system is dealt with. at Coevorden. The themes can be viewed in the table More tasks can be coupled by tackling both flooding below, with a differentiation made between those and drought-related issues at the same time. These that are necessary (these are in green) and those that different levels and themes make adaptive solutions are optional. The optional themes, such as energy possible and support the full system approach. production, housing construction and recreation offer extra opportunities to create support or interconnect. TABEL 3.1: SCHEMATIC OVERVIEW OF THEMES FLOODING DROUGHT WATER SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT AGRI- BIO- ENERGY POTENTIAL QUALITY INCLUSION & RECREATION CULTURE DIVERSITY PRODUCTION HOUSING CONSTRUCTION Local Regional National These themes were discussed during the workshop and an overview was created of the themes with enough available information and where there is a knowledge deficit. It is also unclear whether there is already a thematic interconnection within the retention areas or if such a connection is still necessary. From this we can distil the next steps. 7 8 4 WORKSHOP RESULTS On 19th November 2020 a workshop for the pilot “Flood Plains at Coevorden, Integrated River Management” was held. Below the participants list: TABEL 4.1: WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS ORGANISATION ATTENDEE Province of Drenthe Leo de Vree Province of Drenthe Rinke van Veen Municipality of Coevorden Mark Jurjens Waterboard Vechtstromen Sjon Monincx Province of Overijssel Bart Beukema Waterboard Drents Overijsselse Delta Linda Kuil National Dept. Of Waterways and Public Works (Rijkswaterstaat) Peter Mulder University of Twente Erwin Nugraha Aveco de Bondt (Engineering Consultancy) Eva de Ruiter Aveco de Bondt (Engineering consultancy) Beatrijs Koet The discussions that took place are handled per theme. First there is an introduction with previously collected background information, where available. Then the cursive text relates to the workshop discussions. The last alinea reflects the relation between theme and the retention area. 9 4.1 GENERAL During the workshop there was a short discussion on climate change in general. The following paragraph is a summary: The solutions for both climate adaptation and mitigation often take up a lot of the available space. In a small and overpopulated country like the Netherlands it is always a challenge to find the right balance. Solar parks, water retention areas and the stimulation of biodiversity are all matters that require space – and they often have incompatible effects. Planting woods for extra C02 storage, for example, results in even more drought. When considering measures that require a lot of space, extra thought must be given to the optimal/ most efficient use of this space. 4.2 FLOODING 4.2.1 Local - Delta Plan Spatial Adaptation (DPRA) The Delta Plan for Spatial Adaptation (Deltaplan Ruimtelijke Adaptatie (DPRA)) has been designed to make The Netherlands climate resilient and adaptive to water challenges. Within this framework, the Municipality of Coevorden has carried out a number of stress tests as part of the water alliance Samenwerking Noordelijke Vechtstromen (SNV) – a cooperation of several municipalities, a waterboard and a drinking water company in the region. These stress tests revealed the potential bottlenecks for flooding, heat stress and drought as a result of climate change. These are local results, but the study provides an insight into the impacts of climate change if frequency, intensity and duration of dry, warm and wet periods in the municipality of Coevorden increases. Opening by Mark Jurjens, the Municipality of Coevorden: A lot is happening in Coevorden in terms of the Delta Plan for Spatial Adaptation (DPSA) and the Municipality is actively working on this. Together with the SNV alliance, a tool (Laat je niet Verassen/ Don’t be taken by Surprise) has been made to illustrate the bottlenecks. The Municipality is investing heavily in climate adaptation and investigating how the authority and its citizens can contribute. The dialogue with inhabitants on this matter has had to be rescheduled as a result of Corona virus limitations, but the results can be included in the Municipal Sewerage Plan ( vGRP). The DPSA stress test provides valuable insights into local flood risk areas. A link has not been made with new water retention areas or the need thereof from a DPSA perspective. 4.2.2 Regional (NBW/LBW) In the national administration agreement for water - the NBW (Nationaal Bestuursakkoord Water) - government authorities have set down a strategy, time path and financial plan for cooperating on the great water challenges the Netherlands faces in the 21st Century.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 25 Bus Dienstrooster & Lijnroutekaart
    25 bus dienstrooster & lijnkaart 25 Coevorden - Zweeloo Bekijken In Websitemodus De 25 buslijn (Coevorden - Zweeloo) heeft 2 routes. Op werkdagen zijn de diensturen: (1) Coevorden: 07:25 - 17:15 (2) Zweeloo: 07:55 - 17:45 Gebruik de Moovit-app om de dichtstbijzijnde 25 bushalte te vinden en na te gaan wanneer de volgende 25 bus aankomt. Richting: Coevorden 25 bus Dienstrooster 22 haltes Coevorden Dienstrooster Route: BEKIJK LIJNDIENSTROOSTER maandag 07:25 - 17:15 dinsdag 07:25 - 17:15 Zweeloo, Busstation woensdag 07:25 - 17:15 Aalden, Marsstukken 3 Aelderstraat, Zweeloo donderdag 07:25 - 17:15 Aalden, Aelderstraat vrijdag 07:25 - 17:15 44A Aelderstraat, Zweeloo zaterdag Niet Operationeel Aalden, Oud Aalden zondag Niet Operationeel 2 Gelpenberg, Zweeloo Meppen, Driesprong Meppen, De Kockstraat 12 25 bus Info 12 De Kockstraat, Meppen Route: Coevorden Haltes: 22 Oosterhesselen, De Kockstraat 2a Ritduur: 29 min 2a Wethouder K. Schepersweg, Oosterhesselen Samenvatting Lijn: Zweeloo, Busstation, Aalden, Marsstukken, Aalden, Aelderstraat, Aalden, Oud Oosterhesselen, Irenelaan Aalden, Meppen, Driesprong, Meppen, De Kockstraat Burgemeester de Kockstraat, Oosterhesselen 12, Oosterhesselen, De Kockstraat 2a, Oosterhesselen, Irenelaan, Oosterhesselen, Oosterhesselen, Geserweg Geserweg, Oosterhesselen, Burg. De Kockstraat, N854, Oosterhesselen Oosterhesselen, Oosterhesselerbrug, Oosterhesselen, Oosterhesselerweg 6, Wachtum, Oosterhesselen, Burg. De Kockstraat Rieweg, Dalen, Thyakkerstraat, Dalen, Kruisstraat, Dalen, De Spil, Dalen, Kymmelskampen,
    [Show full text]
  • LOS Zuidoost-Drenthe Jan17
    LOKALE ONTWIKKELINGSSTRATEGIE LOKALE 2015 AANPAKKENZUIDOOST-DRENTHE BOUWEN OP LOKALE KRACHT -2022 Inhoudsopgave Deel 1 1.1. PROCESBESCHRIJVING LOS ........................................................................................ 3 1.2. Gebied ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1. Begrenzing ................................................................................................................ 5 1.2.2. Gebiedsanalyse ......................................................................................................... 5 1.2.3. Krachtenveldanalyse ................................................................................................. 9 1.2.4. Sterktes, zwaktes, kansen, bedreigingen (SWOT) ................................................. 10 1.3. Strategie .......................................................................................................................... 12 1.3.1. Speerpunten ............................................................................................................ 14 1.3.2. Meetbare doelstellingen .......................................................................................... 18 1.4. Activiteitenplan ................................................................................................................ 21 1.4.1. Fase 1: opstellen LOS ............................................................................................. 21 1.4.2. Fase 2: aanjagen
    [Show full text]
  • Verkennend Booronderzoek
    ArGeoBoor Archeologisch vooronderzoek & advies BUREAUONDERZOEK B OORONDERZOEK N34 bij Klooster (Gemeente Coevorden) Een bureauonderzoek en verkennend booronderzoek ArGeoBoor rapport 1288 auteur: L.C. Nijdam (senior prospector) paraaf voor vrijgave datum: 18 maart 2015 Opdrachtgever: Roobeek Advies ISSN: 2351-9975 www.ArGeoBoor.nl E [email protected] T 06-28559693 INHOUDSOPGAVE Samenvatting ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1 Inleiding ........................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Kader ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Doel en Vraagstelling ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Administratieve data ............................................................................................................... 4 2 Bestaande en toekomstige situatie ................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Beschrijving plangebied ........................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Voorziene ontwikkeling ........................................................................................................... 5 3 Bureauonderzoek ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gebiedsdossier Waterwinning Leidsche Rijn
    Naarden Huizerhoogt! Amstelveen Aalsmeer Abcoude Nigtevecht! Bussum ! Hilversumse! Crailo Blaricum Meent TITEL Eempolder ! 0 2,5 km Nederhorst! Ankeveen den Berg DOMEIN LEEFOMGEVING, TEAM GIS | ONDERGROND: 2020, KADASTER | 06-1 1 -20 | 1 234501 | A0 Nes ! aan de Amstel Putten Grondwaterbescherming Eemnes Laren Eemdijk! Boringsvrije zone 100-jaarsaandachtsgebied Baambrugge! Uithoorn Waterwingebied 's-Graveland! Bunschoten-Spakenburg Grondwaterbeschermingsgebied ! Kortenhoef WaterwingebiedKrachtighuizen (bijz. regels) Amstelhoek! ! Loenersloot! Vreeland ! Waverveen! Kerklaan! Hilversum Huinen Nijkerk Baarn Loenen! aan de Vecht Vinkeveen Oud-Loosdrecht! Mijdrecht De Hoef! ! Nieuw-Loosdrecht Holkerveen Wilnis Nieuwersluis! Nijkerkerveen! Nieuwer! Ter Aa Boomhoek! Hoogland Muyeveld! Voorthuizen ! Breukelen Scheendijk Lage Vuursche! Zwartebroek! Breukeleveen! Hollandsche! Rading Hoevelaken ! Tienhoven Soest ! ! Amersfoort Terschuur Noorden GEBIEDSDOSSIER Amersfoort-Koedijkerweg ! Portengensebrug Bethunepolder Oud-Maarsseveen! Maartensdijk! ! WATERWINNING Woerdense Verlaat Stoutenburg! LEIDSCHE RIJN Westbroek! Kockengen! ! Maarsseveen! Molenpolder Soestduinen Amersfoort-Berg ! Den Dolder Barneveld ! Maarssen Achterveld Leusden Groenekan Bilthoven Oud Zuilen! Kanis! ! Haarzuilens Groenekan! ! Beukbergen De Glind! ! Huis! ter Soesterberg Leusden-Zuid Heide ! Kamerik! Sterrenberg Zegveld! Beerschoten De Bilt Leidsche Rijn Vleuten Zeist Woerden Zeist Harmelen Utrecht De Meern Lunteren Woudenberg Scherpenzeel ! Nieuwerbrug! Austerlitz aan den Rijn
    [Show full text]
  • Sportvisserijgebruik ARK, Ijssel En Ijsselmeer
    Rapportage Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht Resultaten sportvisserijonderzoek 2013 Statuspagina Titel Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht; resultaten sportvisserijonderzoek 2013 Samenstelling Sportvisserij Nederland Postbus 162 3720 AD Bilthoven www.sportvisserijnederland.nl Auteur Roland van Aalderen en Remko Verspui E-mail [email protected] Aantal pagina’s 62 Trefwoorden Overijsselse Vecht, sportvisserij, roving survey, aerial survey, creel census, sportvissers enquête, benutting Versie Definitief Projectnummer AV2011-04,05,06 Datum juli 2014 Bibliografische referentie: Aalderen, R.A.A. van, 2013. Sportvisserijgebruik Overijsselse Vecht. Sportvisserij Nederland, Bilthoven. © Sportvisserij Nederland (Bilthoven) Niets uit dit rapport mag worden vermenigvuldigd door middel van druk, fotokopie, microfilm of op welke andere wijze dan ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de copyright- houder. Samenvatting In de maanden juni tot en met september 2013 heeft er een onderzoek plaatsgevonden naar het sportvisserijgebruik van de Overijsselse Vecht. De Vecht ontspringt in Duitsland en heeft een lengte van 167 kilometer, waarvan 60 kilometer in Nederland. In Nederland stroomt de rivier langs Hardenberg, Ommen, Dalfsen en Zwolle. Het is een populair viswater voor recreanten, maar er worden ook veel viswedstrijden gevist. Het onderzoek had de opzet van een zogenaamde ‘roving survey’. In de onderzoeksperiode is negen maal over het gebied gevlogen waarbij sportvissers zijn geteld en op een topografische kaart geregistreerd. Daarnaast zijn door vrijwilligers op negen momenten interviews afgenomen bij sportvissers langs de waterkant en zijn vangstlogboeken uitgedeeld. In totaal zijn er 258 sportvissers waargenomen vanuit de lucht en zijn 38 sportvissers geïnterviewd. Dit aantal is te laag om een betrouwbare typering van het sportvisserijgebruik van de Overijsselse Vecht te geven. Met behulp van landelijke data over het gedrag van sportvissers zijn de tellingen geëxtrapoleerd naar een totaal jaarbezoek.
    [Show full text]
  • Standaard Rapport
    Bestemmingsplan reconstructie N34 (provinciegrens - aansluiting N377) Ontwerp Opdrachtgever: Provincie Drenthe Rapportnummer: RB 10.088 Datum vrijgave: Februari 2015 Opsteller: Dhr. M. Beek Goedkeuring: Dhr. H. de Roo Gemeente Coevorden Blad 2 van 52 Bestemmingsplan reconstructie N34 (provinciegrens – aansluiting N377) Februari 2015 Versie 01 Inhoudsopgave 1 HOOFDSTUK 1 INLEIDEND HOOFDSTUK ....................................................................... 4 1.1 Aanleiding ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Inleiding ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Korte omschrijving van het plan .......................................................................................... 4 1.4 Planologisch kader .............................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Doel ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Verantwoording ................................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Leeswijzer ........................................................................................................................... 7 2 HOOFDSTUK 2 PLANGEBIED EN HISTORIE ................................................................... 8 2.1 Ligging ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Alluvial Architecture of the Coevorden Field (Upper Carboniferous), the Netherlands
    Netherlands Journal of Geosciences — Geologie en Mijnbouw | 86 - 1 | 3 - 14 | 2007 The alluvial architecture of the Coevorden Field (Upper Carboniferous), the Netherlands H. Kombrink1 *, J.S. Bridge2 & E. Stouthamer1 1 Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2 Department of Geological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NYl 3902-6000, USA. * corresponding author. Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected] Manuscript received: February 2007; accepted: February 2006 Abstract A detailed reconstruction of the alluvial architecture of the Coevorden gas Field (Tubbergen Formation, Upper Carboniferous), which is located in the northeastern part of the Netherlands, is presented. This reconstruction is based on well logs, cross-sections and paleogeographic maps. Sedimentological analysis of a 93 m long core allowed to refine the interpretation of the depositional environment. Accurate width determinations are necessary to correctly correlate fluvial sandbodies and reconstruct alluvial architecture. Without using sedimentological information, sandbody width is likely to be overestimated. A method developed by Bridge and Tye (2000) was used to calculate the width of one sandstone body from cross-set thicknesses. On the basis of this calculation and the paleogeographic reconstructions, it may be stated that on average the width of the channel belts we studied in the Coevorden field does not exceed 4 km. Moreover, our paleogeographic reconstructions, which point to a northwestern direction of paleoflow, are in accordance with earlier observations from the study area. The Tubbergen Formation and time- equivalent sediments in Germany are reviewed briefly to put the Coevorden Field in a regional context.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Governance Unie Van Waterschappen Water Governance
    Unie van Waterschappen Koningskade 40 2596 AA The Hague PO Box 93218 2509 AE The Hague Telephone: +3170 351 97 51 E-mail: [email protected] www.uvw.nl Water governance Unie van Waterschappen Water governance The Dutch waterschap model Colofon Edition © Unie van Waterschappen, 2008 P.O. Box 93128 2509 AE The Hague The Netherlands Internet: www.uvw.nl E-mail: [email protected] Authors Herman Havekes Fon Koemans Rafaël Lazaroms Rob Uijterlinde Printing Opmeer drukkerij bv Edition 500 copies ISBN 9789069041230 Water governance Water 2 Preface Society makes demands on the administrative organisation. And rightly, too. Authorities, from municipal to European level, are endeavouring to respond. The oldest level of government in the Netherlands, that of the waterschappen, is also moving with the times in providing customised service for today’s society. This sets requirements on the tasks and the way in which they are carried out. But above all, it sets requirements on the way in which society is involved in water governance. We have produced this booklet for the interested outsider and for those who are roughly familiar with water management. It provides an understanding of what waterschappen are and do, but primarily how waterschappen work as government institutions. Special attention is paid to organisation, management and financing. These aspects are frequently raised in contacts with foreign representatives. The way we arrange matters in the Netherlands commands respect all over the world. The waterschap model is an inspiring example for the administrative organisations of other countries whose aims are also to keep people safe from flooding and manage water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Impacts on Surface Water Quality and Nutrient Loads in 2 Lowland Polder Catchments: Monitoring the Greater Amsterdam Area
    1 Groundwater impacts on surface water quality and nutrient loads in 2 lowland polder catchments: monitoring the greater Amsterdam area 3 Liang Yu1, 2, Joachim Rozemeijer3, Boris M. van Breukelen4, Maarten Ouboter2, Corné van der Vlugt2, 4 Hans Peter Broers5 5 1Faculty of Science, Vrije University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1181HV, The Netherlands 6 2 Waternet Water Authority, Amsterdam, 1096 AC, The Netherlands 7 3Deltares, Utrecht, 3508 TC, The Netherlands 8 4Department of Water Management, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 9 Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands 10 5TNO Geological Survey of The Netherlands, Utrecht, 3584 CB, The Netherlands 11 Correspondence to: Hans Peter Broers ([email protected]) 12 Abstract. The Amsterdam area, a highly manipulated delta area formed by polders and reclaimed lakes, struggles with high 13 nutrient levels in its surface water system. The polders receive spatially and temporally variable amounts of water and 14 nutrients via surface runoff, groundwater seepage, sewer leakage, and via water inlet from upstream polders. Diffuse 15 anthropogenic sources, such as manure and fertilizer use and atmospheric deposition, add to the water quality problems in 16 the polders. The major nutrient sources and pathways have not yet been clarified due to the complex hydrological system in 17 such lowland catchments with both urban and agricultural areas. In this study, the spatial variability of the groundwater 18 seepage impact was identified by exploiting the dense groundwater and surface water monitoring networks in Amsterdam 19 and its surrounding polders. Twenty-five variables (concentrations of Total-N, Total-P, NH4, NO3, HCO3, SO4, Ca, and Cl in 20 surface water and groundwater, N and P agricultural inputs, seepage rate, elevation, land-use, and soil type) for 144 polders 21 were analysed statistically and interpreted in relation to sources, transport mechanisms, and pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Tussen Vecht En Eem
    TVE 1 le jrg. nr.2, mei 1993 Tussen Vecht en Eem ,3688b6ÉS8%S ll!!l!!iliiii!lllllilHl|iwawsjs». ^ÉHiiiiimiijl!1: mm S3 Nederhorst is :l den * illiiiil Berg iff# Tijdschrift van de Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooi en dè Dit tijdschrift wil verleden, heden en toekomst van het Gooi en omstreken in al zijn facetten belichten, met als invalshoeken historisch perspectief, natuur, landschap en ruimtelijke ordening. Het wordt toegezonden aan de leden van de Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooi en de donateurs van de Stichting Tussen Vecht en Eem. De Vereniging van Vrienden van het Gooistelt zich tot De Stichting Tussen Vecht en Eemoverkoepelt ruim 25 doel zowel in het landelijk als in het stedelijk gebiedlokale het en regionale organisaties op historisch en eigen karakter van het Gooi en omstreken zo goedaanverwant gebied. Zij bevordert en verbreidt de kennis mogelijk te bewaren en een goed natuurbeheer te op historisch gebied betreffende de streek, onder andere bevorderen. Zij streeft hierbij naar een milieubeheerin en het Goois Museum te Hilversum. Voorts ijvert zij voor een ruimtelijke ordening, die aantasting van natuur-het enbehoud van cultuurhistorische en karakteristieke cultuurwaarden tegengaan of voorkomen. Het bestuurwaarden. De Stichting organiseert jaarlijks een open dag volgt de ruimtelijke ordening op de voet, adviseertin overéén van de gemeenten in de regio. De stichting is en maakt zonodig bezwaar tegen voorgenomen plannen.opgericht in 1970, maar vormt in feite de voortzetting Er is een door de vereniging ingestelde Gooise van de in 1934 opgerichte Stichting ’Museum voor het Natuurwacht, die misbruik en ontsiering van de natuurGooi en Omstreken’, later ’Vereniging van Vrienden tegen moet gaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective Analysis of Water Management in Amsterdam, the Netherlands
    water Article Retrospective Analysis of Water Management in Amsterdam, The Netherlands Sannah Peters 1,2, Maarten Ouboter 1, Kees van der Lugt 3, Stef Koop 2,4 and Kees van Leeuwen 2,4,* 1 Waternet (Public Water Utility of Amsterdam and Regional Water Authority Amstel, Gooi and Vecht), P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (M.O.) 2 Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Princetonlaan 8a, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 3 World Waternet, P.O. Box 94370, 1090 GJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] 4 KWR Water Research Institute, P.O. Box 1072, 3430 BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The capital of The Netherlands, Amsterdam, is home to more than 800,000 people. Devel- opments in water safety, water quality, and robust water infrastructure transitioned Amsterdam into an attractive, economically healthy, and safe city that scores highly in the field of water management. However, investments need to be continued to meet future challenges. Many other cities in the world have just started their transition to become water-wise. For those cities, it is important to assess current water management and governance practices, in order to set their priorities and to gain knowledge from the experiences of more advanced cities such as Amsterdam. We investigate how Amsterdam’s water management and governance developed historically and how these lessons can be used to further improve water management in Amsterdam and other cities. This retrospective analysis starts at 1672 and applies the City Blueprint Approach as a baseline water management assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • De Vecht Een Streek Van Handel En Vertier
    0217 TT 192-432 her.qxp_ 0405 chs 1-74 16-02-17 17:25 Pagina 288 De Vecht 4 een streek van handel en vertier ‘O Vecht! gy geeft myn Zangnimf stof, Nu gy haar oog vergunt t’aanschouwen Uw Hoven, Boomgaardts, en Landtsdouwen, Om ruim te weiden in uw’ lof. Zy streeft langs uwe waterboorden, Verzelt met menig lustpaleis, Waar in de Bouwkunst leeft naar eisch: O Pronkjuweel van Neerlandts oorden!’ Lucas Rotgans, Poezy van verscheidene mengelstoffen, 1735. 0217 TT 192-432 her.qxp_ 0405 chs 1-74 16-02-17 17:25 Pagina 289 DEELGEBIEDEN – DE VECHT 289 KARAKTERISTIEK Internationaal vermaard en karakteristiek voor het stroom gebied van de Vecht en de Angstel zijn de vele 17de- en 18de-eeuwse bui- tenplaatsen met hun koepelkamers en theekoepels aan het water. Amsterdamse kooplieden hebben hier hun zomerverblijven laten bouwen en de oude kastelen omgevormd tot buitenplaats. Aan de Vecht, tussen Maarssen en Loenen, ligt de grootste, bijna aaneen- gesloten gordel van buitenplaatsen. Elders langs de rivieren, met name aan de Angstel en het Gein, geven half open boerderijlinten met een enkele buitenplaats het gebied een hoge belevingswaarde. Direct aan de rivieren liggen kleine en nog gave historische kernen, zoals de kasteeldorpen Vreeland, Nieuwer ter Aa en Oud Zuilen en de dijkdorpen Maars- sen, Breukelen, Nigtevecht en Loenen. De vestingplaats Nieuwer- sluis verenigt de Oude en de Nieuwe Hollandse Waterlinie. Diverse strategisch gelegen (resten van) kastelen en verdedigings- werken getuigen van de strijd tussen Het Sticht en Holland. Tus- Boven • Grachtbebouwing van Maarssen. sen de Vecht als primaire en de Aa/Angstel als secundaire handels- Links • De buitenplaatsgordel aan de Vecht bij Maarssen met zicht op route vanuit de stad Utrecht liggen enkele historische dwarsver- Doornburgh en Goudestein.
    [Show full text]