EHD) Protein Function
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC Theses & Dissertations Graduate Studies Summer 8-18-2017 Molecular mechanisms of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain containing (EHD) protein function Kriti Bahl University of Nebraska Medical Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd Part of the Biochemistry Commons, Cell Biology Commons, Molecular Biology Commons, and the Structural Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bahl, Kriti, "Molecular mechanisms of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain containing (EHD) protein function" (2017). Theses & Dissertations. 213. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd/213 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Molecular mechanisms of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain containing (EHD) protein function By Kriti Bahl A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College in the University of Nebraska In Partial fulfillment of Requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Under the Supervision of Professor Steve Caplan University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska June, 2017 Supervisory Committee: Richard MacDonald, Ph.D. Justin Mott, M.D., Ph.D. Laurey Steinke, Ph.D. I TITLE Molecular mechanisms of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain containing (EHD) protein function BY Kriti Bahl APPROVED DATE Steve Caplan, Ph.D. June 23rd 2017 Richard MacDonald, Ph.D. June 23rd 2017 Justin Mott, M.D., Ph.D. June 23rd 2017 Laurey Steinke, Ph.D. June 23rd 2017 SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE GRADUATE COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA II Molecular mechanisms of C-terminal Eps15 Homology Domain containing (EHD) protein function Kriti Bahl, Ph.D. Advisor: Steve Caplan, Ph.D. Endocytic trafficking is not only an essential process for the maintenance of cellular homeostasis but also plays a vital role in regulating diverse cellular processes such as signaling, migration and cell division. The C-terminal Eps 15 Homology Domain proteins (EHD1-4) play pivotal roles in regulating distinct steps of endocytic trafficking. Among the EHDs, EHD2 is disparate both in terms of sequence homology (70%) and its subcellular localization at the caveolae. The crystal structure of EHD2 has been solved and it contains an unstructured loop consisting of two proline-phenylalanine (PF) motifs: KPFRKLNPF. However, the other paralogs EHD1, EHD3 and EHD4 contain a single KPF or RPF motif, but no NPF motif. In this study, we sought to elucidate the precise role of the two PF motifs of EHD2 in homo-dimerization, binding with the protein partners, and subcellular localization. We demonstrated that an EHD2 NPF-to-NAF mutant that mimics the homologous sequences of EHD1 and EHD3, lost its ability to dimerize and bind to Syndapin2. However, it continues to localize primarily to the cytosolic face of the plasma membrane. On the other hand, EHD2 NPF-to-APA mutants maintained their ability to dimerize and bind to Syndapin2, but exhibited markedly increased nuclear localization and decreased association with the plasma membrane. Hence, the EHD2 NPF phenylalanine residue is crucial for EHD2 localization to the plasma membrane, whereas the proline residue is essential for EHD2 dimerization and binding. These studies also support the recently proposed model in which the EHD2 N- terminal region may regulate the availability of the unstructured loop for interactions with neighboring EHD2 dimers, thus promoting oligomerization. We further hypothesized that the single PF motif of EHD1 might be responsible for both binding and localization III functions of EHD1. Indeed, the EHD1 RPF motif was required for dimerization, interaction with MICAL-L1 and Syndapin2, as well as localization on tubular recycling endosomes. Moreover, recycling assays demonstrated that EHD1 RPF-to-APA was incapable of supporting normal receptor recycling. The biogenesis of tubular recycling endosomes (TRE), their role in cargo-sorting and subsequently their vesiculation are essential for receptor recycling. EHD proteins have been implicated in the bending and fission of TRE, thus regulating endocytic recycling. Recent studies from our lab have demonstrated that asparagine-proline-phenyalanine (NPF)-containing binding partners of EHD1 and EHD3, such as molecules interacting with CasL-like1 (MICAL-L1) and Syndapin2, are indispensable for TRE biogenesis. Also vital for TRE biogenesis is the generation of phosphatidic acid (PA), an essential lipid component of TRE that serves as a docking point for MICAL-L1 and Syndapin2. EHD1 and EHD3 have 86% amino acid identity; they homo-and heterodimerize and partially co-localize to TRE. Despite remarkable identity between EHD1 and EHD3, they have disparate mechanistic functions. EHD1 induces membrane vesiculation, whereas EHD3 supports TRE generation and/or stabilization by an unknown mechanism. While using phospholipase D inhibitors (which block the conversion of glycerophospholipids to PA) to deplete cellular TRE, we observed that, upon inhibitor washout, there was a rapid and dramatic regeneration of TRE, as observed by immunostaining with MICAL-L1 antibodies. This “synchronized” TRE biogenesis system has enabled us to determine that EHD3 is involved in the stabilization of TRE rather than in their biogenesis. Moreover, we have identified residues Ala-519/Asp-520 in the EH domain of EHD1 and Asn-519/ Glu-520 in the EH domain of EHD3 as being important for that dictating the preference of these two paralogs for NPF-containing binding partners. Overall, we have delineated a model to explain the atomic basis for understanding the differential roles of EHD3 and EHD1 in stabilization and vesiculation of TRE, respectively. IV Table of Contents Title Page .........................................................................................................................I Abstract ...........................................................................................................................I I Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... IV Table of Figures ............................................................................................................ IX List of Tables ................................................................................................................ XII Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... XIII Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... XIX CHAPTER I .....................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................1 1. Endocytic Trafficking .............................................................................................2 1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................2 2. Routes of Internalization ........................................................................................3 2.1 Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis (CME) ........................................................... 6 2.2 Clathrin-Independent Endocytosis (CIE) ........................................................ 8 2.2.1 Caveolae-mediated pathway ................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Clathrin-Independent Carriers/GPI-AP-enriched early endosomal compartment CLIC/GEEC………………………………………………………….9 2.2.3 Arf6 Associated Pathway ...................................................................... 10 2.2.4 Flotillin Dependent Pathway ................................................................. 11 2.2.5 Other routes .......................................................................................... 11 3. Sorting of Cargo at EE/ SE .................................................................................. 11 3.1 Sorting to the lysosomes for degradation ....................................................... 12 3.2 Sorting for Recycling ...................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Significance of TREs in Recycling ......................................................... 15 V 3.3 Sorting for TGN .............................................................................................. 16 4. Regulators of Endocytic Trafficking ................................................................... 18 4.1 Regulation by Rab GTPases........................................................................... 19 4.1.1 Rab5 and the early endosome ................................................................ 23 4.1.2 Rab7and the maturation of the late endosome ........................................ 26 4.1.3 Rabs in Fast Recycling ........................................................................... 27 4.1.4 Rab11 and Slow Recycling ..................................................................... 28 4.2 Arf GTPases ...................................................................................................... 29 4.3 SNAREs ...........................................................................................................