DOCSLIB.ORG

File No. 36179 in the SUPREME COURT of CANADA (ON APPEAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
File No. 36179 in the SUPREME COURT of CANADA (ON APPEAL File no. 36179 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: DEREK RIESBERRY Appellant (Respondent) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent (Appellant) RESPONDENT’S FACTUM HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, RESPONDENT Rule 42 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada Ministry of the Attorney General Burke Robertson LLP Crown Law Office – Criminal 441 MacLaren Street, Suite 200 720 Bay Street, 10th floor Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2H3 Toronto, Ontario M7A 2S9 Matthew Asma and Mike Kelly Robert E. Houston, Q.C. Telephone: 416-326-2506 Telephone: 613-236-9665 Facsimile: 416-326-4656 Facsimile: 613-235-4430 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the Respondent, Ottawa Agent for the Respondent, the Attorney General for Ontario the Attorney General for Ontario Lafontaine & Associates Supreme Advocacy LLP 330 University Avenue, Suite 506 340 Gilmour St., Suite 100 Toronto, ON M5G 1R7 Ottawa, ON K2P 0R3 Eugene Meehan, Q.C. Gregory Lafontaine Marie-France Major Telephone: 416-204-1835 Telephone: 613-695-8855 Facsimile: 416-204-1849 Facsimile: 613-695-8580 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for the Appellant, Ottawa Agent for the Appellant, Derek Riesberry Derek Riesberry Respondent’s Factum i Riesberry v. R., 36179 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. 1 Part I: Overview and Statement of Facts .............................................................................. 1 A. Respondent’s Position .................................................................................................... 1 B. Statement of Facts .......................................................................................................... 2 Part II: Question in Issue ...................................................................................................... 3 Part III: Statement of Argument ............................................................................................ 4 A. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4 B. The legislation in issue .................................................................................................... 6 C. Statutory history ............................................................................................................. 7 (i) The history of ‘cheating at play’ in the Code .............................................................. 7 (ii) The history of ‘game’ in the Code ............................................................................... 9 D. Interpreting section 209 ............................................................................................... 10 (i) Principles of statutory interpretation ....................................................................... 10 (ii) Purposive interpretation of section 209 ................................................................... 10 (iii) Interpretation of the English offences ...................................................................... 12 E. Application to the present case .................................................................................... 13 F. Deceit adding an element of chance ............................................................................ 14 G. Question of mixed fact and law .................................................................................... 15 Part IV: Costs ...................................................................................................................... 16 Part V: Order Sought .......................................................................................................... 16 Part VI: Table of Authorities ................................................................................................ 17 a. Statutes and Regulations ................................................................................................. 17 b. Texts ................................................................................................................................. 17 c. Jurisprudence ................................................................................................................... 18 Part VII: Statutes & Regulations .......................................................................................... 19 Criminal Code, s. 197(1), s.v. ‘bet’ and ‘game’ ...................................................................... 19 Criminal Code, s. 209 ............................................................................................................. 19 Criminal Code, s. 691(2) ........................................................................................................ 20 Rules of Standardbred Racing, 2008, ch. 2, s.v. ‘post position’ ............................................ 21 Rules of Standardbred Racing, 2008, rr. 17.09 – 17.10 ........................................................ 21 Supreme Court Act, s. 40(3) .................................................................................................. 22 Respondent’s Factum 1 Riesberry v. R., 36179 PART I: OVERVIEW AND STATEMENT OF FACTS A. Respondent’s Position 1. The trial judge’s undisputed error in acquitting the appellant entitles the Crown to a new trial on the charges of cheating at play. The appellant had injected his race horse with a performance-enhancing drug, intending to obtain advantage in an official race upon which members of the public had wagered thousands of dollars. By doping his race horse, the appellant imposed a risk of loss on the betting public. His plea for an acquittal by this Court must be rejected. 2. This appeal turns on interpreting s. 209 of the Criminal Code. As relevant to this appeal, s. 209 prohibits cheating, while playing a game, with intent to defraud any per- son. There is no dispute that the appellant cheated, given the trial judge’s factual find- ings. Rather the dispute in this Court relates to the “game” element: whether the horse race was a “game”, and whether victims must be co-competitors in the “game”. 3. The meaning of “game” is restricted by a partial definition in the Cr. Code and the jurisprudence, requiring that a “systemic resort to chance” must be built into the game. That restriction limits what counts as a “game”. The appellant seeks to impose a new, parallel restriction to also limit the meaning of “any person” – a move that is not justified by the statute or by case law. 4. The appellant would interpret the section so that doping his race horse does not make him guilty of cheating the public who were betting on the outcome. He says he can only be guilty of cheating the other competitors (which is not the charge against him). If the appellant is right, then members of the public who had legally bet money on the horse race, expecting it to be run fairly and in compliance with the law, were not cheated by him doping his race horse and depriving them of a fair result. 5. The appellant is wrong. The requirement of a “systemic resort to chance” begins and ends with proof that the horse race was a “game”. There is no further requirement that the people who were cheated were people playing the “game”. The appellant’s novel interpretation would undermine the purpose of the section and should be rejected. Respondent’s Factum 2 Riesberry v. R., 36179 B. Statement of Facts 6. The appellant’s statement of facts is accurate. The respondent also relies on the facts stated in the respondent’s factum in the fraud appeal, and adds the following facts relevant to the cheating offences. 7. Standardbred horse racing has elements of both skill and chance. Uncontested evidence at trial showed that a systemic element of chance consists in the determination of the horse’s starting position, called “post position” (“position de départ”). Post posi- tions are determined by a “random post position generator” on the Standardbred Cana- da computer system. The computer draws at random from among the horses entered in a given race to determine which horse starts in which post position. The more advanta- geous post positions are those closer to the inside rail of the track, since those post posi- tions offer the shortest travelling distance around the track. Evidence of J. Locke, R.R. tab 2 at p. 37 line 28 – p. 38 line 20 Evidence of S. Spencer, R.R. tab 3 at p. 63 line 15 – p. 64 line 23 8. The random determination of post positions is legally mandated by the Rules of Standardbred Racing, 2008 [the Rules], a regulation made by the Ontario Racing Com- mission under authority of the Racing Commission Act, 2000. The Rules, specifically rules 17.09 and 17.10, require that entrants’ post positions must be “drawn by lot” from among the entered and eligible horses that are selected to start the race. Racing Commission Act, 2000, S.O. 2000, c. 20, s. 11(1) [R.B.A. tab 1, at p. iv] Rules of Standardbred Racing, 2008, ch. 2 (s.v. “post position”) and ch. 17, rr. 17.09 - 17.10 [R.B.A. tab 1, at p. 6 and p. 52] 9. Federal regulations require that after post positions are drawn, that information must be made available to the public, before bettors place their bets on a race. Pari-Mutuel Betting Supervision Regulations, S.O.R./91-365, r. 26(1)(c) [R.B.A. tab 2 at pp. 18-19] Respondent’s Factum 3 Riesberry v. R., 36179 PART II: QUESTION IN
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Criminal Code - General Remarks
    -.=a;.t II it If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. U.S. Departrrent of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this clilfl'~~G material has been granted by Public Domain/NIJ US Department of Justice to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the c~t owner. 'r 'T 'r -- T 'Y ., - • - , 'T .. • - • ISS .1. -.. ," 4.•• EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exaclly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Nationat tnstltute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by Law Reform Commission of Canada to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis· sion of the copyright owner. Une edition fran<;aise de ce document de travail est disponible. Son titre est : LA JURIDICTION EXTRA-TERRITORIALE Available by mail free of charge from: Law Reform Commission of Canada 130 Albert St., 7th Floor Ottawa, Canada KIA OL6 or Suite 310 Montreal, Quebec H3B 2N2 ©Ministry of Supply and Services Canada Catalogue No.
    [Show full text]
  • FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution
    FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution by Joshua Alan Krane A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Graduate Department of the Faculty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Joshua Alan Krane (2010) FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution Joshua Alan Krane, B.Soc.Sc., B.C.L/LL.B. Master of Laws Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2010 Abstract The enactment of civil asset forfeiture legislation by Alberta and Ontario in the fall of 2001, followed by the passage of similar legislation in five other provinces, has signalled a dramatic change in the way Canadian constitutional law ought to be understood. This thesis builds on American legal scholarship by highlighting how deficiencies in Canada’s constitutional law could create space for more inva- sive civil forfeiture statutes. Following a historical overview of forfeiture law in Canada, the thesis (i) examines how the Supreme Court of Canada mischaracter- ized this legislation as a matter of property and civil rights; (ii) considers whether the doctrine of federal paramountcy should have rendered the legislation inoper- able and the consequences of the failure by the Court to do so; and (iii) evaluates -ii- the impact of the absence of an entrenched property right in the constitution, in regard to this matter. -iii- Table of Contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 The Aim of this Project..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Criminal Law and Procedure
    Federation of Law Societies of Canada National Committee on Accreditation Why Criminal Law Is a Mandatory Subject The study or practice of criminal law in other jurisdictions is not adequate preparation for Canadian criminal law and procedure. This is because there is no body of law or area of practice that is as culturally and politically driven as the law of crimes. As a result, in spite of many core similarities, the law of crimes varies dramatically from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. More importantly, each jurisdiction develops its own legal culture which must be understood before competence can be attained. This is particularly so in Canada. Four reasons can be identified. First, the criminal law of Canada is complicated by federalism in a uniquely Canadian way. The federal government holds jurisdiction over the definition of criminal law and procedure, but the administration of criminal justice falls within provincial jurisdiction. There is therefore an array of federal and provincial laws that touch the topic. Canadian practitioners must understand the subtle interplay of federal and provincial rules. Second, unlike the criminal law in some other common law states, common law offences are not permitted in Canada. More importantly, basic Canadian criminal offences are included in a criminal code that has no general part. In other words, the principles that identify and animate the criminal law are not found in the statutes but are buried as underlying principles in the case law. The law cannot therefore be understood simply by reading the Criminal Code and related statutes, or by relying on general principles of statutory interpretation, or even by reading the leading cases in a discrete area.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Criminal Law in Newfoundland and Labrador
    HISTORY OF THE CRIMINAL LAW IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR “Now it is a terrible business to mark a man out for the vengeance of men. But it is a thing to which a man can grow accustomed, as he can to other terrible things… And the horrible thing about all legal officials, even the best, about all judges, magistrates, barristers, detectives and policemen, is not they are wicked (some of them are good), not that they are stupid (some of them are quite intelligent), it is simply that they have got used to it. Strictly they do not see the prisoner in the dock; they see the usual man in the usual place. They do not see the awful court of judgment; they only see their own workshop.” - Commissioner Antonio Lamer quoting from G.K. Chesterton who had sat on a jury almost 100 years ago and had been impressed by the fresh perspective that a jury could bring to the work of professionals who could become insensitive because of familiarity.1 From Settlement to Confederation Canada To understand the nature and purpose of criminal law as it applies in Newfoundland and Labrador, it is necessary to understand its sources.2 Our criminal law principles are founded on British Law as it became introduced into Canada, developed from colonial times. Under the British colonial system, the letters patent or instructions issued by the Crown to the Governor governed the constitution of a settlement. When unsettled territory was conquered by or ceded to England, it was a matter of royal prerogative whether the Crown would grant the territory its own constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Developments in the Law ®F Criminal Conspiracy
    DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW ®F CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY PETER MAcKINNON* Saskatoon Introduction The origins of criminal conspiracy can be traced back a thousand years' though a study of this crime is not an antiquarian pursuit. The conspiracy offence has survived its own haphazard development and overcome the lack of a widely accepted rationale. It remains a pro- secutor's popular weapon, a defence counsel's nightmare and an academic's riddle . But it is changing. In the last few years some of the most difficult problems in the law of criminal conspiracy have been recognized and debated. It is my purpose to review these develop- ments, to comment on improvements where they have been made, and to discuss current problems in this complex area of our criminal law. 1981 CanLIIDocs 14 1. The Definition of Conspiracy and the Meaning ofAgreement. Canadian law owes its general definition ofconspiracy to the words of Mr. Justice Willes in the English case, Mulcahy v. Regina:2 "A conspiracy consists not only in the intention of the two or more but in the agreement oftwo ormore to do an unlawful act or to do alawful act 3 by unlawful means ." This definition is in substance incorporated into "4 . our Criminal Code under the heading "common law conspiracy English law has since included a statutory definition in legislation reforming the law of criminal conspiracy:' If aperson agrees with any other person orpersons thata course of conduct shall be pursued which wilt necessarily amount to or involve the commission of any offence or offences by one or more ofthe parties tothe agreement if the agreement is carried out in accordance with their intentions, he is guilty of conspiracy to commit the offence or offences in question .6 * Peter MacKinnon, of the Faculty of Law, University of Saskatchewan, Saska- toon .
    [Show full text]
  • 78103NCJRS.Pdf
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ~ j'l I , National Criminal Justice Reference Service I : L Ontario Criminal Justice Terminology i' j for I , I • nCJrs L" ' Statistical Data and I nformation Systems This microfiche was produced from documents receiv~d for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on r \ this frame may be used to. evaluate the document quality. J • i . i 4 . , .. , 1 I ' ~ 1/11/2.8 2 5 W 11111 . I~ 1/,1/3.2 A proposal developed by Hoi 2.2 u.: w I~ i w I~ I ~ I,. 1.1 "" u - "'''" The Ministry of the Attorney General - r; The Ministry of Correctional Services ! ~ The Ministry of the Solicitor General The Provincial Secretariat for Justice ""'1.25 ""'1.4 ,11"11.6 )r; , I ' 1980 MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART t J ~Aijct!Al BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A ""\" U.S. Department of Justice 78103 Nat/onallnslltute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the r. I person or organization originating it, Points of view or opinions stated 1 1 rn this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily Points of view or opin10':~s stated in this document are I Justice.represent the official position or policies of the NatiQnal Institute of those of the author(s) and do nqt represent the official Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been position or policies of the U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Administration of Criminal Justice in Canada William B
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 43 | Issue 1 Article 1 1952 The Administration of Criminal Justice in Canada William B. Common Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation William B. Common, The Administration of Criminal Justice in Canada, 43 J. Crim. L. Criminology & Police Sci. 2 (1952-1953) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN CANADA William B. Common William B. Common, Q.C. is Director of Public Prosecutions for the Province of Ontario, Dominion of Canada. He has been associated with the Department of the Attorney General for twenty-five years and during that time has been actively en- gaged in prosecution at trial and in the Court of Appeal on many important criminal cases in the Dominion of Canada. He is considered an outstanding author- ity on the administration of criminal law in the Dominion of Canada and has lectured on specialized related subjects and contributed several articles to legal journals. Mr. Common is a graduate of the University of Toronto and Osgoode Hall Law School in the year 1923. For the past twelve years his activities have been confined exclusively to appellate work.-EDITOR. Much flattering comment has been made at different times respecting the Administration of Justice by the Canadian Government, particularly with regard to the speed with which criminal cases are handled.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Status of Lottery Schemes in Canada
    THE LEGAL STATUS OF LOTTERY SCHEMES IN CANADA: CHANGING THE RULES OF THE GAME By JUDITH ANNE OSBORNE LL.B., The University of Edinburgh, 1977 M.A., The University of Toronto, 1978 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Faculty of Law) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard Professor Michael A. Jackson Professor Dennis J. Pavlich THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1989 (c) Judith A. Osborne, 1989 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Q^p^ <^ Ql(=3 jL^&JA The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date 3gT)ftf/33- DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT The term "lottery scheme" is a generic one used in the Criminal Code of Canada to encompass both true lotteries and other games of chance. Until 1969, the Criminal Code prohibited such gambling activities, with the exception of very small scale, occasional and private lottery schemes run for charitable purposes, and lottery schemes operated at agricultural fairs. This criminal prohibition was a longstanding one which had existed in Canada since before Confederation.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Prosecution Service
    Public Prosecution Service ANNUAL REPORT for the period April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 Public Prosecution Service ANNUAL REPORT for the period April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010 Honourable Charlie Parker Speaker of the Nova Scotia House of Assembly Office of the Speaker Province House Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 2Y3 Dear Mr. Speaker: I have the honour of presenting to you, and through you to the Members of the Legislative Assembly, the Annual Report of the Public Prosecution Service of Nova Scotia, as required by Section 13 of the Public Prosecutions Act. This report covers the period of April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010. Martin E. Herschorn, Q.C. Director of Public Prosecutions CONTENTS The Mandate of the Public Prosecution Service . .1 Mission . 1 Goals . 2 Core Business Functions . 2 Priorities and Accomplishments 2009–2010. 3 Measuring Our Performance . 7 The Role of the Attorney General . 8 The Role of the Director of Public Prosecutions . 9 The Role of the Crown Attorney . 10 Organization Description . 12 Appendix A: Criminal Code Charges in Provincial Court . 16 by Offence Category and Judicial Centre Appendix B: Provincial Statute Cases . 18 by Judicial Centre Appendix C: Appeals Branch Statistics . .19 Appendix D: Budget Resources . .21 Appendix E: Public Prosecutions Act. 22 N O V A S cot I A P U B L I C P rosecut I on S er VI ce • 2009/2010 Annu A l R e p o R t 1 THE MANDATE OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION SERVICE In Nova Scotia all prosecutions for criminal and provincial offences are brought in the name of the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • 545 a Critique of Canadian Criminal Legislation Part
    545 A CRITIQUE OF CANADIAN CRIMINAL LEGISLATION PART ONE I.Introduction Scope of the study The main object of this study is an examination of the concepts of Canadian legislators as to the nature of criminality and their attitude toward the problem of crime. Its purpose is not an exposition, either descriptive or critical, of Canadian criminal law and procedure. It is to be noted at the outset that all the legislation in force in Canada which in some way pertains to the subject of crime is by no means to be found in some section of the Criminal Codel. However, in view of the fact that the Code, 'with its 1152 sections, deals with the great bulk of Canadian criminal law and procedure, it seems justifiable to assume that its history may be taken as fairly representative of the development of Canadian criminal legislation. Therefore the present discussion will be confined primarily to the Criminal Code, with only incidental reference to other statutes. It will be an attempt to consider, in a general way, the sources of the Code, the cir- cumstances surrounding its adoption, its underlying principles, and the course of amendment since it was first established . The matter which will be made the subject of a more detailed consideration will be the attitudes of the legislators towards the crime problem and the results thereof as shown in the development of the Code from the date of its adoption to the present time. To this end, after a discussion of the back- * Submitted as a thesis in the seminar in Criminology in Relation to Criminal Law and Procedure by Professor Sheldon Glueck, and in the seminar in Legislation by Professor James McC.
    [Show full text]
  • Assimilation Through Incarceration: The
    ASSIMILATION THROUGH INCARCERATION: THE GEOGRAPHIC IMPOSITION OF CANADIAN LAW OVER INDIGENOUS PEOPLES by Madelaine Christine Jacobs A thesis submitted to the Department of Geography in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September, 2012) Copyright ©Madelaine Christine Jacobs, 2012 Abstract The disproportionate incarceration of indigenous peoples in Canada is far more than a socio- economic legacy of colonialism. The Department of Indian Affairs (DIA) espoused incarceration as a strategic instrument of assimilation. Colonial consciousness could not reconcile evolving indigenous identities with projects of state formation founded on the epistemological invention of populating idle land with productive European settlements. The 1876 Indian Act instilled a stubborn, albeit false, categorization deep within the structures of the Canadian state: “Indian,” ward of the state. From “Indian” classification conferred at birth, the legal guardianship of the state was so far-reaching as to make it akin to the control of incarcerated inmates. As early iterations of the DIA sought to enforce the legal dominion of the state, “Indians” were quarantined on reserves until they could be purged of indigenous identities that challenged colonial hegemony. Reserve churches, council houses, and schools were symbolic markers as well as practical conveyors of state programs. Advocates of Christianity professed salvation and taught a particular idealized morality as prerequisites to acceptable membership in Canadian society. Agricultural instructors promoted farming as a transformative act in the individual ownership of land. Alongside racializing religious edicts and principles of stewardship, submission to state law was a critical precondition of enfranchisement into the adult milieu.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    848 ALBERTA LAW REVIEW VOL. 39(4) 2002 A CHOICE AMONG VALUES: THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE DEFENCE OF NECESSITY 0 BENJAMIN L. BERGER The author explores various theoretical approaches l 'auteur examine diverses demarches theoriques a to the defence of necessity, rejecting both excusatory la defense de la necessite, rejetant /es conceptions conceptions of the defence and those based on the d'excuse de la defense el eel/es qui sontfondees sur notion of moral involuntariness. Rather, the author la notion de caractere involontaire du point de vue argues that necessity is properly understood as a moral. l 'auteur argumente plutot le fail que la justificatory defence based on a lack of moral necessile est bien acceptee dans le cas de defense blameworthiness. After extensively surveying the justifiable fondee sur un manque de reprehension history of the defence in Canadian law, the author morale. Apres un examen approfondi de I 'histoire de critiques the way in which the Supreme Court of la defense dans le droit canadien, I 'auteur fail la Canada has restricted the defence. He contrasts the critique de la maniere dans laquelle la Cour supreme current Canadian approach with the treatment of the du Canada a limite la defense. II compare la defence in other jurisdictions and concludes that demarche canadienne actuelle au traitement de la Canadian law would be served best by a robust defense dans d 'au/resjuridictions, et conclut que la defence of necessity, which would acknowledge that, loi canadienne pourrait profiter d'une solide defense in some circumstances, pursuit of a value of greater de la necessite, reconnaissant ainsi que dans certains worth than the value of adherence to the law can be cas, on peut justifier la poursuite de la valeur d 'rm justified.
    [Show full text]