NOAA Grant Number: NA08NMF4540664 (DMR#3312
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Deep-Water Bottom Dropping Page 6 FISHING
Doves usher in a new season * September 12, 2008 Texas’ Premier Outdoor Newspaper Volume 5, Issue 2 * Report on Page 6 www.lonestaroutdoornews.com INSIDE Flyway rivalry prompts HUNTING Texas’ dove research Timing of hunt causes stir among hunters BY CRAIG NYHUS on doves. A team was out two days prior to the hunting season to collect Dove hunters in Texas have long bird specimens for a study compar- feared a federal requirement for the ing the effectiveness of lead and non- use of nonlead shot to pursue their lead shot. But some outfitters and hunters were taken aback by the early Grayson County has become quarry. The state holds the same con- cerns, especially after other states in shooting. famous for its big bucks in the the Central Flyway tried to force Texas Parks and Wildlife biologists state’s lone archery-only Texas to require nonlead shot based are in the first year of a multi-year county. A petition to modify on their waterfowl studies, according study to determine the effectiveness the archery-only rule has many GUNNING FOR RESEARCH: Using volunteer hunters, TPW biologists are to officials. of different load types on wild hunters up in arms. conducting a three-year study of shot effectiveness on dove, but the early That was the genesis of Texas’ own mourning doves using trained Page 7 hunt caused a PR nightmare for officials. Photo by TPW. study on the effect of nonlead shot See DOVE, Page 16 Teal are arriving on schedule along the Texas coast in time for the early season. -
Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game
Maine State Library Digital Maine Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books Inland Fisheries and Wildlife 1-1-1975 Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975 Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books Recommended Citation Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game, "Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary, 1975" (1975). Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books. 301. https://digitalmaine.com/ifw_law_books/301 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Law Books by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maine Open Water Fishing Laws Summary Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Game 284 State Street, Augusta, Maine 04330 0££K) auie^M 'e+snSny '+994S 9+p+S VQZ FISHING LICENSES Commissioner of Indian Affairs stating that the person described is an awe0 pue sauaijsij pupguj jo juauupiedaQ auip^Aj Indian and a member of that tribe. For this purpose, an Indian shall RESIDENT NONRESIDENT be any member on tribal lists of the Penobscot and Passamaquoddy 16 years and older . $ 6.50 Season: age 16 and older $15.50 Tribes, or a person on the membership list of the Association of Combination ............. 10.50 12-15 years inclusive .. 2.50 Aroostook Indians and who has resided in Maine for at least 5 years. ‘ 3-day . ’ 6.50 15-day* “ ........................ 10.50 “ Leave or furlough . 2.50 7-day ................................. 7.50 3-day ................................ -
Marine Science
ICES Journal of Marine Science ICES Journal of Marine Science (2015), 72(3), 992–996. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu232 Contribution to the Themed Section: ‘Risk Assessment’ Introduction Risk assessment and risk management: a primer for marine scientists Mark T. Gibbs1,2 and Howard I. Browman3* 1Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia 2AECOM 540, Wickham Street, Fortitude Valley, QLD 4007, Australia 3Institute of Marine Research, Marine Ecosystem Acoustics Disciplinary Group, Austevoll Research Station, N-5392 Storebø, Norway *Corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Gibbs, M. T., and Browman, H. I. Risk assessment and risk management: a primer for marine scientists. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 72: 992–996. Received 29 November 2014; accepted 30 November 2014. Risk assessment is the management approach or framework of choice in many disciplines, including health care and research, engineering design, and particularly the insurance sector which relies on the best available forward projections of natural hazards and accidents. The marine manage- ment community, which includes researchers, practitioners, and resource managers responsible for individual targeted stocks, aquaculture activ- ities, and the marine environment in general, has been slower to take up quantitative risk assessment approaches. Whilst there are prominent examples where risk assessment and management approaches have been applied, they are relatively few. This article theme set presents examples of such and identifies tools and approaches that can be applied to coastal and oceanic marine systems worldwide. The methods developed and the lessons learned from these studies can be used to guide researchers, practitioners, and resource managers. -
Revision Draft
MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery Public Certification Report Prepared for the Western Australian Fishing Industry Council Certificate Number: MSC-F-31208 10 December 2020 Conformity Assessment Body MRAG Americas, Inc. (CAB) Richard Banks (TL/P3), Kevin McLoughlin (P1) and Mihaela Zaharia Assessment team (P2) Fishery client Western Australian Fishing Industry Council Assessment Type First Reassessment 1 MRAG Americas – US2733 Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery PCR MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR RB, MZ, KM 8 March 2020 ASP 9 March 2020 CDR/PRDR RB, MZ, KM 8 June 2020 RB 9 June 2020 PCDR RB, MZ,KM 10 July 2020 RB 13 July 2020 ASP 12 August 2020 FRD RB, MZ,KM 29 Sept 2020 RB and ASP 13 Nov 2020 PCR RB, MZ, KM 8 December 2020 EW 9 Dec 2020 2 MRAG Americas – US2733 Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery PCR MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 1 Contents 1 Contents ..................................................................................................................... 3 2 Glossary ..................................................................................................................... 6 3 Executive summary .................................................................................................... 8 4 Report details ........................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Authorship and peer review details .............................................................. -
MARINE FISHERIES REGULATION SUMMARY As of June 1, 2020
MARINE FISHERIES REGULATION SUMMARY as of June 1, 2020 Updated by Jared Silva, Policy Analyst This is not an official copy of the Commonwealth’s marine fishery laws and regulations. The information in this document outlines the general laws and regulations governing recreational and commercial fishing in the waters under the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It is not comprehensive. Although every attempt has been made to keep this document accurate and up to date, this is not an official copy of the Commonwealth’s marine fishery laws and regulations, and should not be consulted as such. The closure maps depicted in this document demonstrate certain specific closures but are not inclusive of all closures that may affect a certain fishing activity. Please review official copies of M.G.L. c. 130 and 322 CMR for full and accurate descriptions of marine fisheries laws and regulations. For comprehensive regulations contact the Secretary of State Division of Publications and Regulations and for the statutory text to M.G.L Ch. 130 visit the Massachusetts Legislature’s website (http://www.malegislature.gov). MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES RULES & REGULATIONS SUMMARY (as of June 1, 2020) Refer to Chapter 130 and 322 CMR for details. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE FISHERY 3 RECENT REGULATORY CHANGES 7 RECREATIONAL FISHING 8 HOOK AND LINE (includes Rod & Reel) 10 LOBSTERING commercially with Traps in state waters 14 LOBSTERING commercially with Traps - using Student Lobster Permit 18 LOBSTERING commercially with SCUBA in state waters 20 LOBSTERING recreationally with Traps or SCUBA using the Non-Commercial Lobster Permit 23 POTTING for Sea Bass 25 POTTING for Scup 27 POTTING for Whelks 30 FISH WEIRS 31 SINK GILLNETTING (Fishing on or near bottom) 33 SURFACE GILLNETTING (Fishing on or near surface) 35 MOBILE GEAR: Trawls, Scottish/Danish Seines, and Pair Seines – no regulatory fishery endorsements or inshore net 38 MOBILE GEAR: Trawls, Scottish/Danish Seines, and Pair Seines - with small-mesh regulated fishery endorsements. -
Maine State Legislature
MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) REVISED STATUTES 1964 prepared Undet. l~e Supervijion oll~e Commitlee on Revijion 01 Stalulej Being the Tenth Revision of the Revised Statutes of the State of Maine, 1964 Volume 6 Titles 33 to 39 Boston, Mass. Orford, N. H. Bost0n Law Book Co. Equity Publishing Corporation st. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co. Text of Revised Statutes Copyright © 1904 by State of Maine 6 Maine Rev.Stats. This is a historical version of the Maine Revised Statutes that may not reflect the current state of the law. For the most current version, go to: http://legislature.maine.gov/legis/statutes/ Ch.3 WATERS-PROTECTION-IMPROVEMENT CHAPTER 3 PROTECTION AND IMPROVEMENT OF WATERS Subch. Sec. I. Water Improvement Commission __________________________ 361 II. Interstate Water Pollution Control ________________________ 491 III. Criminal Liability ___________ - ____ -- __ _ ___ -__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 571 SUBCHAPTER I WATER IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION ARTICLE 1. ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS Sec. 361. Organization; compensation; meetings; duties. 362. Authority to accept federal funds. 363. Standards of classification of fresh waters. 364. -Tidal or marine waters. 365. Classification procedure. 366. Cooperation with other departments and agencies. 367. Classification of surface waters. 368. -Inland waters. 369. -Coastal streams. 370. -Tidal waters. 371. -Great ponds. 372. Exceptions. ARTICLE 2. -
Research TAC Set Aside Scallop Exemption Program for 2008
NOAA Grant Number: NA14NMF4540071 Grantee: Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME DMR) Project Title: An Assessment of Sea Scallop Distribution and Abundance in Federal and Adjacent State Waters of the Gulf of Maine Project Code: 14-SCA-11 Amount of Grant: 53,192 lbs. of scallops for 2014 ($558,515) and 35,461 lbs. of scallops for 2015 ($372,344) Start Date: 03/01/2014 Period Covered by Report: 03/01/2014 - 06/30/2018 Executive Summary The sea scallop fishery in the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) occurs in federal waters and is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council (NEFMC). The fishery is managed by total allowable catch (TAC) independently of the rest of the EEZ sea scallop stock. A cooperative survey was carried out by the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) and the University of Maine (UMaine) in May-June 2016. Survey results indicate that the biomass (by meat weight) of NGOM sea scallops targeted by the fishery (102+ mm or 4+ in. shell height (SH)) was approximately 728 MT in 2016. Landings from the NGOM were significantly higher in 2016 than any previous year and were largely from southern Jeffreys Ledge and northern Stellwagen Bank. Maine state waters were surveyed in 2015-16. A strong year-class observed in Cobscook Bay in 2015 recruited to the fishery in 2016. Other rotational areas surveyed with notable densities of harvestable scallops were Machias Bay, Gouldsboro Bay/Dyers Bay and West Vinalhaven (2015) and Cutler coast, Chandler Bay and Lower Blue Hill Bay (2016). Purpose The major objective of the project was to develop a survey program to assess scallop distribution and abundance in federal waters of the NGOM Scallop Management Area (as defined in Amendment 11 to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan) and to estimate a biologically sustainable TAC for the stock. -
The Arran Marine Regeneration Trial
Community of Arran Seabed Trust The Arran Marine Regeneration Trial Development of a Community-Based Marine Protected Area The Proposals February 2005 c/o The Secretary of COAST Claveron Lamlash Isle of Arran KA27 8NB Tele: 01770 600552 email: [email protected] web: www.arrancoast.co.uk “I‟m truly sorry man‟s dominion has broken Nature‟s social union.” Robert Burns 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. BACKGROUND 5 1.1 Community of Arran Seabed Trust 5 1.2 Arran 6 1.3 Lamlash Bay 7 1.4 Maerl 7 1.5 Context 8 2. OBJECTIVES 9 3. PROGRESS TO DATE 10 3.1 A community lead approach to marine conservation 10 3.1.1. Clauchlands maerl No Take Zone 11 3.1.2 Lamlash Bay Marine Protected area 12 3.1.3 Fisheries regeneration 13 3.2 Baseline Biological Surveys 13 3.2.1 Seasearch 13 3.2.2 University Marine Biological Station Millport 14 3.3. Conservation significance of Lamlash Bay 15 3.3.1 Maerl 16 3.3.2 Sea Grass and wider area 19 3.3.3 Commercial and other species in NTZ and MPA 20 4 BENEFITS TO OTHER USERS 20 4.1 Fisheries 20 4.2 Tourism and associated socio-economic benefits 22 5 ACTION PLAN 22 5.1 Arran Marine Regeneration Trial 22 5.2 Monitoring 22 5.3 Funding 24 6 CONCLUSIONS 24 7 REFERENCES 25 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 27 APPENDIX 1 28 APPENDIX 2 ` 29 APPENDIX 3 30 APPENDIX 4 31 APPENDIX 5 1 APPENDIX 6 and APPENDIX 7 3 . -
Research TAC Set Aside Scallop Exemption Program for 2008
NOAA Grant Number: NA11NMF4540019 (DMR#4312) Grantee: Maine Department of Marine Resources (ME DMR) Project Title: An Assessment of Sea Scallop Distribution and Abundance in Federal and Adjacent State Waters of the Gulf of Maine Project Code: 11-SCA-04 Amount of Grant: 77,135 lbs. of scallops from any open area or open access area Start Date: 03/01/2011 Period Covered by Report: 03/01/2011 – 3/31/2015 Executive Summary The sea scallop fishery in the Northern Gulf of Maine (NGOM) occurs in federal waters and is managed by the New England Fishery Management Council. The NGOM resource and associated fishery are at times locally important but amount to a small portion of the total stock and landings. The fishery is managed by total allowable catch (TAC) independently of the rest of the EEZ sea scallop stock. The NGOM fishery does not use biological reference points as targets or thresholds. A cooperative survey was carried out by the Maine Department of Marine Resources (DMR) and the University of Maine in May-June 2012. Survey results indicate that the biomass (by meat weight) of NGOM sea scallops targeted by the fishery (102+ mm or 4+ in shell height) was approximately 164 MT (90% confidence interval of 74-279 MT) in 2012. Landings during 2009-12 amounted to approximately 7 MT. Based on these biomass estimates the exploitation rate in weight (landings/stock biomass, assuming harvested scallops greater than 102 mm shell height and a survey dredge efficiency of 43.6%) during 2012 was 2.1% with a 90% confidence interval from 1.3% to 4.7%. -
Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission
MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT OCTOBER 2002 Prepared By: MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT OCTOBER 2002 Prepared By: MAINE ATLANTIC SALMON COMMISSION DENNYS RIVER INSTREAM FLOW STUDY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ......................................................................... 4 2.1 Dennys River.......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Fishery Management and Habitat Use.................................................................... 6 2.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Surrounding Land Use .......................................................................................... 13 3.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 14 3.1 General Approach................................................................................................. 14 3.2 Scoping ................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.1 Study Area................................................................................................ 15 3.2.2 Study Reaches.......................................................................................... -
Revision Draft
MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 8950 Martin Luther King Jr. Street N. #202 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Email: [email protected] President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery Announcement Comment Draft Report Prepared for the Western Australia Fisheries Industry Council 17 March 2020 Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) MRAG Americas, Inc. Assessment team Richard Banks (TL/P3), Kevin McLoughlin (P1) and Mihaela Zaharia (P2) Fishery client WAFIC Assessment Type First Reassessment 1 MRAG Americas – US2733 Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 Document Control Record Document Draft Submitted By Date Reviewed By Date ACDR RB, MZ, KM 8 March 2020 ASP 9 March 2020 2 MRAG Americas – US2733 Shark Bay Prawn Managed Fishery MRAG-MSC-F13-v1.1 March 2020 1 Contents 1 Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 2 Glossary .......................................................................................................... 6 3 Executive summary ......................................................................................... 8 4 Report details .................................................................................................. 9 4.1 Authorship and peer review details ......................................................................... 9 5 Assessors ....................................................................................................... -
An Investigation of Neotectonic Activity in Coastal Maine by Seismic Reflection Methods
Maine Geological Survey Neotectonics of Maine 1989 An Investigation of Neotectonic Activity in Coastal Maine by Seismic Reflection Methods Joseph T. Kelley Maine Geological Survey State House Station 22 Augusta, Maine 04333 Daniel F. Belknap R. Craig Shipp Sarah B. Miller* Department ofG eological Sciences University of Maine Orono, Maine 04469 *present address: Weston Consultants Weston Way West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380 ABSTRACT Seven embayments along the Maine coast (Saco Bay, Casco Bay, Sheepscot Bay, Eggemoggin Reach, Machias Bay, Cobscook Bay, and Oak Bay) were surveyed for evidence of late Quaternary faulting by seismic reflection methods. The bays are representative of all coastal compartments in Maine, and all are located near regions of Paleozoic or older faults. In more than 1000 km of seismic reflection profiles one possible recent fault was resolved along with numerous slump and gas deposits. While one might argue that faulting triggered the slumps that were observed, no consistent association of slumps and faults was recognized. Slumps appear confined to the margins of deep channels where tidal current action, possibly in conjunction with natural gas evolution, triggers their occurrence. Instead of finding continuous slumping along a basin, as might be the case if faulting initiated the slumping, the slump deposits were widely scattered and even occurred in basins with no inferred bedrock faults. The possible recent fault was observed in Oak Bay, along the Canadian border. In this area of frequent seismic energy release tidal range is also extreme. The feature indicated as a possible fault may, thus, be a manifestation of current reworking of Quaternary sediment.