TRAILS STUDY. KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES PRELIMINARY DRAFT

by Thomas, William R.

ALASKA GOLD RUSH TRAILS

Washington-Alaska Military Cable & FWLB Telegraph System, Koyukuk-Chandalar 1298 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION

NORTHWEST REGION IN REPLY REFER TO: Alaska Field Office 524 W. 6th Ave., Suite 201 Anchorage, Alaska 99501

April 21, 1975

ALASKA GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES PRELIMINARY DRAFT ,.

Enclosed are maps depicting the Koyukuk-Chandalar routes which were inadvertently deleted from the preliminary report which was recently sent to you for review. Please attach these maps to the back of the preliminary report.

We would appreciate any comments you may have on the report by Me.y 19, 1975. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Servrce WILLIAM R. THOMAS Chief, Alaska Field Office

fj n:n

0 ?!.\13 J J;;] 3:lllO"lW, ~J HSd·s·n

llllll~iillll~~~~~llilllillilj]li3 4982 00028166 6 ALASKA GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY

Tonono Cnatonika Fairbanks KOYOKOK-CHANDOLAR 1Ft Gibbon) • ROUTEs

hlitaraa • Fort •Selkirk MAP I KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGEND M«Jor. RD11tt Brenth: or Alternate Routt • '"-' lhelte• Cabin • YfHaoet or Settl-at 0 Abln~ Town or Slttleeent Q Partb11:t Ab&'Mionld Settl~

1. T1nana {ft. Gibbon) KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGEND Major Route Broncb or A1 terna te ru,u tt known Shelter C.Mn • Y111~ or Sett11!11'1tnt •0 Abandoned Tam or Settlement (.) Parttall_y Abandol\ed Settle!llll!nt

Site ..!!!,. l!!!'!.

2, A~tic City ,, Berl)Ban Aiatno •S, Allakaket 6, Peavey I, a. =:iii:: f~!!l 9. Evansvilie MAP 3 KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGEND Major Route 61'"Mch or Alternate Route 8 "- Shelter Cabin • Y11lage or Settl..nt 0 Abaltdoned TDWn or- Set t1 eaent Q: Part1t1lY Aba-nikmed Settle~~~nt

10. Tra.way Bar 11. Coldfoot (construction camp) 12, Shte Creek 13. Wiseman {Nolan) 14. Nolan Crt!ek 15. Kllm'I'IOnd River MAP4 KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGI:ND

• bl:>tom Shelter Cobin • YHlase cr Settlement 0 Abandoned Town or Settlement Q Ptrtblly Ahandoiled Sttt1eme:nt

16. Prindpal Cl>andalar Mining Area 17. Coro MAP 5 KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGEND Mlijol" RIXIW 81"tlftdt or Al ternUe Rout. • 1tnown SM1~er Cabin • Villa~ or'Settle~~ent 0 Abandoned Town or Settle~Ent Q Pa:rt1al1y Abandoned Se:t.tlment MAP 6 KOYUKUK-CHANDALAR ROUTES LEGEND

Maj ... - 8Nnch or Alternate- Route known Shelter Cabtn • vnh~ or Settl..,nt •0 Abandoned Town or S.tt1llllllfnt Q Partially Abandoned Sett1 ..nt

Silo A !!1!!.

zo. Beaver Creek 21. ~ai g Btmd" I\ rea 22. Seaver Creek. 5Llll'lllel"' Ret::reation Tra!l 23. Be!vtt' Creek Winter lt4crE:at1on Tr~dl 24. Olne$ 25. ChatanH:a 26. Ft, Hamlin ; ' ~.., E UNITED STATES ,r ; n c: "'·'DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR <:;.;;;:--•.,/ i Plfr3~EAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION INREPLYREFER-4-b,t•S:~,. ; .• (.,:-, oJrnC:E ANtHCh{AGLALASKA 1000 SECOND AVENUE 524 W. 6th, Suite 201 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98104 Anchorage, AK 99501

April 15, 1975

ALASKA GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY KOYUKUK-CHAi'IDALAR ROUTES PRELIMINARY DRAFT

The Act of 1968, Public Law 90-543, authorized the establishment of a nationwide system of recreation and scenic trails to help provide for ever increasing outdoor recreation needs. The Appa­ lachian and Pacific Crest Trails were designated in the Act as the initial components of the system. Fourteen additional trails are to be studied for possible inclusion in the system by the Congress. The "Gold Rush ':trails" in Alaska were among the trails listed for such study.

Responsibility for studying the Gold Rush Trails has been assigned to the Alaska Field Office of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. After meeting "lith state and federal agencies and contacts with interested organizations ani private citizens, seven gold rush trails in Alaska were selected in January 1974 for initial study: Seward-Nome rcute (), the Valdez-Fairbanks Trail, the Chilkoot Trail, the White Pass Trail, the Dalton Trail, the Valdez-Eagle Trail and the Telegraph Route (Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System), and the Wiseman TraH (Koyukuk-Chandalar routes), Over the past year, studies have been underway on these trails and routes to determine their suitability for inclusion in the National Scenic Trails System and their potential for further in-depth study.

Prior to compilation of a complete report on the trails, we are extremely interested in obtaining input and comments from those per­ sons having specific knowledge or interest in one or more of the particular trails or routes. Enclosed for your review is a draft of the preliminary report on the Koyukuk-Chandalar routes (earlier described as Wiseman Trail). We would appreciate any comments or suggestions you may have by May 19. 19U- If you know of other groups or persons in addition to-those on the attached mailing list who may have pertinent information or comments, please feel free to contact them or let us know.

Thank you for your help. ·?;{;tte.~ f< T:~~·~-~ WILLIAM R. THOMAS, Chief, Alaska Field Office MAIL I·N G LIST

GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY/KOYUKUK-CRANDALAR ROUTES

State Director, National Park Service U.S. Geological Survey, Diviaion of 334 W. 5th, Suite 350 Water Resources Anchorage 99501 508 W. 2nd Ave. Anchorage 99501 State Director, BLM 555 Cordova Richard LeDosquet, District Manager Anchorage 99501 BLM P.O. Box 1150 Fairbanks 99707 Director, Alaska Division of Parks 323 E. 4th Ave. Alaska Historical Society Anchorage 99501 Box 80687 College, AK 99701 Scott Grundy, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game 1300 College Road Cook Inlet Historical Society Fairbanks 99701 121 W. Seventh Ave. Anchorage, 99501 Pete Cizmich, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game 333 Raspberry Road Tanana-Yukon Historical Society Anchorage 99502 Box 3102 Fairbanks. 99701 Bon. Walt Parker, Commissioner Alaska Dept. of Highways Alaska Conservation Society P.O. Box 589 BoxD Douglas, AK 99824 College 99701

Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation Fairbanks North Star Borough, Pouch 0 Planning Dept. Juneau 99801 P.O. Box 1267 Fairbanks 99701 Executive Secretary, Alaska Bicentennial Commission Anchorage Center for the Environment 338 Denali 913 W. 6t

Director, Loussac Library 427 F Street Anchorage 99501 .. Michael O'Meara 800 S. Lane til Anchorage 99504

Sam White 902 Kellum Fairbanks 99701

Director, Fairbanks North Star Borough Library 901 1st Fairbanks 99701 .. President, Village Council Tanana, AK 99777

President, Village Council Allakaket, AK 99720

President, Village Council Evansville (Bettles) AK 99726

President, Village Council Alatna, AK

President, Village Council Beaver, AK 99724

Wiseman Village Council Wiseman, AK

Dave Ketscher Bettles, AK 99726

Bill Snyder, Dept. of Anthropology Brynmawr College Brynmawr, PA 19010

Jim Hunter Box 462 Fairbanks 99707

President, Village Council Fort Yukon, AK 99740 KOYUKUK - CHANDALAR ROUTES*

BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION

ALASKA FIELD OFFICE

*Earlier described for preliminary study as the Fairbanks-Wiseman Trail A. BACKGROUND

Lieutenant Allen of the U.S. · ray conducted the first official exploration in the upper Koyukuk R c,·er drainage. In 1885, he crossed overland from the Yukon River along the divide between the Tozitna and Melozitna Rivers, down the Kanuti River and then up the Koyukuk River as far north as the John River confluence. That same year Lt. Cantwell of the U.S. Revenue Narine Service traveled up the Koyukuk by steamer, then took skin boats up the Alatna River and portaged over into the Kobuk River drainage.

John Bremner, who had accompanied Allen on his expedition through Alaska, and a partner Peter (or Peder) Johnson were the first known prospectors in the upper Koyukuk in 1887. Although not documented, some people believe they found gold at Tramway Bar on the Middle Fork during that year. However, it was not until 1893 that the first paying gold was reported to be taken at Tramway Bar.

Between 1887 and 1897 only 18-20 different prospectors were reported in the upper Koyukuk region. During that tim~small amounts of gold were taken out of the Tramway Bar area and in the South Fork drainage.

The Klondike Gold Rush in 1898 brought thousands of gold seekers not only to the Yukon Territory but to many areas throughout Alaska. In the summer of 1898 over 1,000 persons are reported to have taken steamers up the Koyukuk in search of gold in the upper drainage. Host were soon dis­ couraged by the absence of bonanzas and by the remote, inhospitable country. According to Robert }~rshall (Arctic Village), only 200 persons over­ wintered in the upper Koyukuk that year (Schrader reports 500-600) in the instant towns of Arctic City and Bergman (near the Arctic Circle below the Alatna confluence), Peavey (near the South Fork confluence) and in some of the camps along the South Fork.

The following spring of 1899 saw even more of the "Ninety-eightersu leave the Koyukuk district. Those that stayed were the more seasoned prospectors and their persistence quickly paid off when new strikes were made that spring and summer on Slate Creek and Hyrtle Creek, tributaries of the Hiddle Fork. That year two new "towns" were founded: one, Slate Creek at that creek's confluence with the Middle Fork, and the second, Bettles, located just below the John River confluence.

In 1900, Bettles largely replaced the downstream town of Bergman as the major supply point for the upriver placer mines. The town of Slate Creek became known that year as Coldfoot, named after a "cheechako" or newcomer who upon reaching the Slate Creek diggings, got "coldfeet" and turned back.

2 Over the next several years several hundred miners worked the placers of the Coldfoot area and in the North Fork and South Fork drainages of the Koyukuk. In 1906, a gold strike was made in the Chandalar district to the east and several hundred men, many from the upper Koyukuk, rushed to the new diggings around Chandalar Lake.

A new town of Caro was founded on the Chandalar River at Flat Creek. However, the cabins were deserted within two or three years and fewer than 50 men remained in the district when little gold was recovered.

During the winter of 1907-08, new gold discoveries were made on Nolan Creek north of Coldfoot and a reported 200 men rushed to the Koyukuk during the spring of 1908. In 1911, at about the time when the richer surface placers were nearly exhausted, deep placers were discovered in the Hammond River area. Spawned by this strike and continued activity in the Nolan Creek area, Wright's roadhouse at the confluence of Wiseman Creek and the Middle Fork grew into the town of Nolan. Mining in the Coldfoot area had declined steadily over the past several years and postal service was discontinued to Coldfoot in 1912. In 1923, the Nolan Post Office was officially renamed Wiseman, after the creek.

The primary mode of transportation to and from the Koyukuk distrtct was by boat up and down the Koyukuk. However, some overland travel took place, especially in the winter months, and several trails were estab­ lished. All the major overland routes began at various settlements along the Yukon River. An early route left Ft. Yukon, followed the Chandalar River (originally reported as Chandlar) upriver, crossed a divide and followed Slate Creek dovm to Coldfoot. Another early route left the Yukon near Ft. Hamlin (dovmstream of Stevens Village), followed the Dall River upriver, crossed the divide to the South Fork of the Koyukuk, and then traversed the South Fork headwaters to Slate Creek and Coldfoot.

A somewhat later route established by the Alaska Road Commission (ARC) left the Yukon at Ft. Gibbon at the confluence of the Tanana and went up the Tozitna River drainage, into Kanuti drainage, and then followed the Koyukuk upriver from near Allakaket to Bettles, Coldfoot, and Nolan. Another trail established by the ARC went north from Beaver on the Yukon to Caro on the Chandalar and then connected with local trails to mines in the Chandalar district and with the trail up the Chandalar River to the Koyukuk district. Trails also connected Ft. Gibbon and Beaver .with Fairbanks.

3 B. LOCATION AND REGIONAL El\TVIRONMENT

GENERAL ALIGNMENT

The accompanying maps outline the known trails to the Koyukuk district or Wiseman area, and the adjacent Chandalar district.

Only two of these routes, both built by the Alaska Road Commission, can be considered major trails of the gold rush era. The so-called Ft. Gibbon-Koyukuk trail left the Yukon River at Ft. Gibbon, followed the Tozitna River, then its tributary Dagislakha Creek, over a divide and up the Melozitna River, past Lake Todatonten, down the Kanuti River and up the Koyukuk to Allakaket, Bettles, Coldfoot, and Nolan (Wiseman). The trail was rerouted at least twice to make a more direct route between Allakaket and Bettles and was rerouted to follow better terrain on the north side of the Middle Fork between Bettles and Coldfoot.

The other major trail extended from Beaver north across the Had­ weenzic River and over the Chandalar River divide to Caro. From Caro several trails led to local mining areas. A connecting trail v7as also established from Chatanika (later Olnes), which v7as linked to Fairbanks by a road and railroad, down Wickersham Creek to Beaver Creek, across Victoria Creek, over the divide and across the Yukon Flats to Beaver.

In several areas such as alpine or marshy places, tripods or stakes were used to mark a route. Most of these had to be regularly replaced and trail alignments could vary by as much as a mile from year to year. Similarly, winter travel was greatly ·influenced by local snow conditions and "trail" locations were readily altered year to year if better con­ ditions existed nearby.

LENGTH

Table I gives the approximate mileage of the various trail segments.

The Ft. Gibbon-Koyukuk Trail was approximately 250 miles long to Nolan (Hiseman) from the present day town of Tanana. The route from Chatanika to Caro was approximately 195 miles long.

REGIONAL CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY, VEGETATION

The climate of the Koyukuk and Chandalar regions, similar to that of much of the Alaskan interior, is described as sub-arctic continental. Winters are long, dark, and severe beginning with freeze-up in early October of lakes and streams and ending with break-up usually in May. Snowfall averages 50-80 inches annually although heavier amounts may occur at higher elevations. Extended periods of -40°F to -60°F are

4 TABLE I

.Approximate Distances Between Various Points on Trails to Koyukuk and Chandalar Mining Districts

Major Segments Mileage

Fort Gibbon (Tanana)-Allakaket 158 Allakaket-Bettles (old route) 50 (newer route) 40 (modern route) 36 Bettles-Coldfoot 53 Coldfoot-Nolan (Wiseman) 12 Chatanika-Beaver 120 Beaver-Caro 75

Other Segments

Caro-Flat Creek (to Little Squaw Creek) 45 Caro-Coldfoot (via West Fork) 85 Caro-Coldfoot (via Crooked Creek) 90 Caro-Big Creek (to Little Squaw Creek) 48 Caro-Chandalar Lake 50 Chandalar Lake-Little Squaw Creek 60 Fort Yukon-Caro 15 Fort Hamlin-Coldfoot 110 150 Connecting Trails and Roads

Fairbanks-Fort Gibbon 120 Fairbanks-Chatanika (by railroad) 32

5 common during the winter and -80°F has been recorded in recent years at Coldfoot. Due to its location above the Arctic Circle and to surrounding mountains, Wiseman receives no direct sunlight from the first week in December through the first >-leek in January.

Summers are in complete contrast to winters with warm temperatures and little, if any, darkness. Temperatures in the 70's and SO's are com­ mon and occasional readings in the 90's have been reported. Host of the 10-20 inches of annual precipitation over the region falls in the summer months in the form of rain showers. Freezing temperatures have been reported in all months except July in most areas. A frost-free season generally extends from the first of June to the end of August.

Permafrost, either continuous or discontinuous, underlays much of the region except along streams and on some favorable south-facing slopes.

North of Bettles and north of Caro the hills and rugged mountains of the Brooks Range dominate the landscape. Relief is great with peaks rising 2,000-3,000 feet above the many broad, glacially-carved valleys which lace the Range. Peak elevations generally range between 4,000 and 6,000 feet. The elevation of Caro is approximately 1,000 feet, Wiseman 1,200 feet, and Bettles (new to,m) about 650 feet.

The Kanuti Flats is the dominant topographic feature betv:'een Bettles and the Kanuti River. Relief is generally low with occasional hills and ridges rising to 1,000-1,200 feet in elevation.

The Ray Mountains and associated hills to the west divide the waters flowing into the Koyukuk from those rivers flowing south directly into the Yukon, such as the Melozitna ~nd Tozitna. These mountains and hills are much less rugged than those of the Brooks Range, having more gently sloping sides and little exposed rock surfaces. The divide crossed by the Ft. Gibbon-Koyukuk trail is approximately 1,200 feet in elevation, although nearby peaks in the Ray Mountains rise to over 3,000 feet. After dropping down into the low valley of the Tozitna River, the trail climbs to over 2,000 feet before dropping down to the present town of Tanana along the Yukon River (elevation about 200 feet).

South of Caro, the Beaver-Caro trail climbs to over 2,400 feet in crossing the rounded low mountains which form the divide between the Chandalar River and the Hadweenzic River drainage. Nearby mountains rise to only several hundred feet above the trail. Between this divide and Beaver, relief is moderate with the trail intersecting east-west trending ridges and tributaries of the Hadweenzic.

6 The village of Beaver is located in an immense area known as the Yukon Flats at an elevation of 362 feet above sea level. The White Mountains separate the Yukon Flats from the Tanana River lowlands of the Fairbanks area. After crossing the Flats, the old Chatanika-Beaver trail climbs to over 2,000 feet in crossing the Victoria and Beaver Creek drainages. The Chatanika area north of Fairbanks is characterized by high hills (or domes) and ridges rising 1,000-2,000 feet above small stream and creek valleys.

Vegetation over the region varies greatly due to topography and the absence or presence of permafrost. Along the Koyukuk River and its upper tributaries and along the Tozitna River, a bottom land spruce-poplar for­ est is found. Najar trees include w·hite spruce and balsam poplar. On gently rising slopes above the river valleys an upland spruce-hardwood forest generally exists consisting of white and blacl<. spruce, poplar, aspen and birch. The Kanuti Flats is characterized by a lowland spruce­ hardwood forest consisting of the variou3 tree species but dominated by large areas of black spruce and open marsh or muskeg. Alpine and moist tundra are found in the higher divide area between the Kanuti and Tozitna drainages, just north of Tanana, and on many of the mountain slopes in the Brooks Range. Treeline generally ranges between 2,000 and 2,500 feet.

The mountain area between Wiseraan and Chandalar Lake is largely vegetated with tundra and willow plants with only occasional sparse stands of white spruce. South of Chandalar Lake, the river valleys of the Chan­ dalar River drainage are largely covered by either a bottom land spruce­ poplar forest or an upland spruce-hard\vood forest.

A short section of alpine tundra is crossed in the divide between the Chandalar and Hadweenzic Rivers. Heavy upland spruce-hardwood and lowland spruce-hardwood forests dominate the area north and south of Beaver with an intervening section of bottom land spruce-poplar forest along the Yukon River. Upland spruce-hard\,'ood forest covers much of the w~ite Mountain region along the trail route to Chatanika.

Large game animals are common throughout the region, although most populations are sparse in relation to land area because of the harsh climatic conditions and absence of available winter food. Caribou, moose, Dall sheep, black bear, brown/grizzly bear, and wolves are locally present in varying concentrations. Important waterfowl nesting areas are located in the Kanuti Flats and Yukon Flats. Small fur-bearers including lynx, beaver, mink, land otter, weasel, marten, and muskrat are abundant over much of the region at lower elevations. Common raptors in the region include northern bald eagle, golden eagle, osprey, rough-legged hawk, goshawk, marsh hawk, great horned owl, great grey owl, and others. Gyr­ falcons are occasionally observed in the higher regions of the Brooks Range and the endangered peregrine falcon is present in the region.

7 During some periods of the year, mosquitoes and biting flies are extremely numerous. Even repellents and head nets cannot fully protect one at times from the mental anquish of the massive drone of wings and endless attack,

I~ USES AND ACCESS

The only pennnnent settlements in the areas of the historic routes include Tanana (1970 pop. 120), Allakaket (1970 pop. 174), Bettles (est. pop. 50), Hiseman (less than 10), and Beaver (1970 pop. 101). Little land has been cleared and most of the routes traverse an uninhabited, primitive environment. Hunting, fishing, trapping, berry-picking, log cutting, and other subsistence-oriented activities are taking place within a general radius of 30-50 miles around the villages listed above.

A small amount of mining is still taking place in the Wiseman area and around Chandalar Lake. 11 Cat 11 trails used by heavy equipment in these areas link camps and airstrips with mining and prospecting areas.

In the last year an all-weather gravel road has been completed roughly following the old Dall Creek trail from the Ft. Hamlin area north to Coldfoot, up the ~fiddle Fork, past Hiseman, and over Dietrich Pass to the North Slope. Several construction camps are located along this road between the Yukon River and Dietrich :Pass, one at Coldfoot. Hen and equipment at these camps will be used in the construction of an oil pipe­ line paralleling the road which will transport the oil from Prudhoe Bay on the North Slope south to the port of Valdez on the Gulf of Alaska. The pipeline road connects with the existing Elliott Highvmy from Fair­ banks at the Yukon River and is scheduled to be open to the public by 1977.

Tanana, Allakaket, Bettles, and Beaver are served by regular commercial air service and many additional 11 bush11 strips exist in the region. The pipeline camps are also presently served by commercial air service. Charter air service is available at Bettles.

GENERAL LAND OHNERSHIP

Virtually all of the land traversed by the several routes to the upper Koyukuk and Chandalar areas is currently in federal ownership, managed by the Bureau of Land Management. However, the Alaska State­ hood Act and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971 set in motion substantial changes in future land ownership and manage­ ment in Alaska. Approximately 40 million acres are to be selected for ownership by Native corporat:i.ons and 103 million acres by the State of Alaska. An additional 83 million acres of public domain lands have

8 been proposed for addition to the National Park, National Wildlife Refuge, National Forest and Wild and Scenic Rivers Systems.

Twenty-five to~vnships surrounding the villages of Bettles (Evans­ ville), Allakaket, Tanana, and Beaver have been ~-Iithdra'l<.rn for native selection. Between the native selection areas of Tanana and Allakaket much of the route area has been classjfied as "public interest lands" under Section 17(d) (1) of ANCSA. Much of the ¥Jhite Hountains area is similarly classified. These (d) (1) lands are withdrawn from all fonns of appropriation under the public land la~vs, including the mining and mineral leasing laws except for the location of metalliferous minerals.

The Hiddle Fork of the Koyukuk valley has been withdrawn as a utility corridor. The Chandalar area east of the utility corridor within the Brooks Range has largely been selected by the State of Alaska and is pending receipt of patent.

Between the Chandalar River and the ~fuite Mountains much of the route area has been withdrawn under Section 17(d)(2) of ANCSA and is proposed for inclusion in the Yukon Flats National \.Jildlife Refuge. These lands are withdrawn from all forms of appropriation. A similar (d) (2) corridor, two m:i.les wide, has been withdrmm along Beaver Creek within the "'-'bite Hountains. This river is proposed for inclusion in the National Hild and Scenic Rivers System.

In the Chatanika area and south to Fairbanks, lands have been either patented to the state or are pending transfer of patent from the federal government.

An area of the Central Brooks Range immediately adjacent the west boundary of the utility corridor is classified under Section 17(d)(2) and has been proposed for inclusion in the Gates of the Arctic National Park. This proposed parkland encompasses lands in the North Fork of the Koyukuk drainage within about ten miles of '1-liseman.

All native lands must be selected by December of 1975, all state lands by 1985, and action on proposed additions to the national con­ servation system by December 1978.

The Ft. Gibbon-Koyukuk trail, the Chatanika-Beaver trail, the Beaver-Caro trail, and the Caro-Coldfoot trail were part of the terri­ torial system of roads and trails and were constructed and maintained by the Alaska Road Commission using federal and/or territorial moneys. The State of Alaska maintains that a right-of-way still exists in the name of the State along all such roads and trails pursuant to revised Statute 2477 authorized by Congress in 1866.

9 The current Bureau of Land Hanugement land .status records sho'v a reservation under 44LD513 (Department of the Interior land decisions) for most of the historic routes to and from the Wiseman and Chandalar area. As such, these trails would be reserved for public purposes in federal ovmership should patent be transferred.

10 C. HISTORIC RESOURCES

PERIOD AND 1YPE OF USE

Some remarks by F.C. Schrader of the U.S. Geological Survey following his visit to the Chandalar and Koyukuk districts in 1899, aptly describe travel in the region:

"The Chandler (sic) and Koyukuk River regions form no exception to the rule of Alaskan travel. The almost invariable means is by boat or canoe along the water­ ways in summer, and overland by trail with the use of dog sleds in winter. The term "trail" as used in Alaska, refers more particularly to the passable con­ dition of the country than to any foot-beaten path or well-worn line of travel. This is especially true of the Chandler (sic) and Koyukuk regions. 11

Most of the early stampeders and subsequent movement of supplies to the Koyukuk district came up the Koyukuk River by steamer to the head of navigation at Bergman and later Bettles. From there, people and goods transferred to horse-draw"TI scov.• or pole-boat and were taken upriver to Coldfoot or Nolan (\-Tiseman). Supplies often were stored until winter when they were taken upriver from Bettles by horse-drawn sled or dog team.

In the early days of the Koyukuk boom, some overland surmner travel took place along the Dall Creek divide route from Ft. Hamlin on the Yukon to Coldfoot. However, even by 1909, Haddren of the U.S. Geological Sur­ vey describes this route as poorly marked and little used. Horses and a few cows were reported taken over this route.

There was also a "trail'' used in the early stages of gold discovery that follmved the Chandalar River up from Ft. Yukon to the West Fork over the divide, across the South Fork of the Koyukuk headwaters and dmvn Slate Creek to Coldfoot. This 'tvas reported to be used in both sum­ mer and winter. Maddren reported that winter and summer mail was carried to Coldfoot over this route from Ft. Yukon prior to 1906. (Because steamers reached Bettles during the summer, it is doubtful that much mail was car­ ried up this route in summer).

In 1906, winter mail was carried north by dog team from Ft. Gibbon on the Yukon to the upper Koyukuk following a route up the Tozitna River drainage, over the divide to Allakaket and up the Koyukuk to Bettles, Coldfoot, and Nolan. Over the next several years the Alaska Road Com­ mission worked on the trail and finished it to winter trail standards in the winter of 1909-1910. By 1917, the section between Bettles and Nolan had been upgraded to winter sled road standards. Horses as well as dogs were used to carry freight over this sled road.

11 TABLE II (Continued)

Koyukuk 1915 300 rrs. 000 14 Chand alar 10 5000 N.A. Koyukuk 1916 250 310,000 12 Chand alar 10 9000 N.A. Koyukuk 1917 200 250,000 7 Chandalar 10 15,000 N.A. Koyukuk 1918 150 150,000 2 Chandalar 10 13,000 N.A. Koyukuk 1919 130 llO, 000 2 Chandalar N.A. 10,000 N .A. Koyukuk 1920 119 90,000 0 Chanclnlar 50 HI, 000 N.A. I~oyukulc 1921 107 78,000 0 Chandalar Est. 50 30,000 N .A. Koyukuk 1922 101 132,000 0 Chandalar Est. 50 83,000 N.A. Koyukuk 19?.3 97 37,000 0 Chanda1ar 35 42,000 N.A.

TOTAL: Koyukuk approximately $1; 3/4 million Chandalar " $300,000 to 1970 Koyuk.uk II $7 million Chandalc:l II $800,000

Data compiled from Harshall' s f::.r_s- ti~ and U.S. Geological Survey Bulletins on Alaska Mineral Resources.

15 HISTORIC TRAIL REH~~Al\TS

Nany of the historic trails in and to th::- Koyukuk and ChandalPr areas continued to be used after the gold rush era by dog teams, horse­ dra\..rn -vmgons and sleds, trac.tors and then later by 11 cats11 (caterpillar tractors), ATV 1 s (all-·terrain-vehicl,~s), and snm·: machilles. Thus, trails over many of the old routes, are still very evJdent.

The old route from Ft. Gibbon to Bettles can be followed for most of its distance. This route has been traveled since the early mining days by vehiclcc: and a tJ:dck approximately eight to ten feet 1:Jide is visible espec:L:d ly thrnu forestt:d or bruOihy areas. The segment between Allakak0t and ll0ttlcs (real from or trail) is heavily used by local residents on sncH machir:es in the ·winter.

Several old and modern tractor trails exist between Bettles and Wiseman, one of which probably vms superimposed on the old trail and later sled road. From Coldfoot to vJiseman a nevl gravel road has been built along the Hiddle Fork for construction of the trans--Alaska oil pipeline.

Host of the old trails between Coldfoot and the Chandalar area and between C.'3ro a;;d t}ie mines have be<:n traveled in recent yec::rs by "cats" and ot:heJ: vr:h:Lclc:~~ and cle::;xcd st;:cte:lws throuz;)1 trees ;;mel bntsh arc in evidence. As in the case of the Koyukuk trails, most of this travel has bet>n in the \vinter months "nd lo~v~·grolving brush and tundra vegetation forms the bed of most of these trails.

The wagon road v1hich ,,,as developed from Beaver to Caro is still extremely visible with little obstructions visible to winter travel. A wide roadbed of perhaps 20-30 feet exists along the entire route.

The ChatQnika-Beavcr trail is the least altered segment of the original lCoyukuk-Ch::mdalar routes and, at the same time, the least visible. The development in the Fairbanks area and the construction of the Steese and Elliott Highvmys obliterated the original trail from Chatanika to about Hile 22 of the Elliott Highway. At that point the old route has been used in recent years by snow machiners to the "Big Bend" area of Beaver Creek. From this area the old trail can be seen only faintly in a few places as it went north along Beaver Creek up over a divide, across Victoria Creek, over another divide, and across the Yukon Flats to Beaver.

Periodic shelter cabins were erected along those trails and sled roads constructed by the Alaska Road Commission. Several of these cabins are still standing along the Beaver-Care wagon road and along the Chatanika-Beaver trail. Cabins and remains of original cabins may also be present between Caro and Coldfoot and between Tanana (Ft. Gibbons) and Allakaket.

16 Tools, implencn.ts, and equipment hauled over the old routf:s undoubt-- edly were lost or abandoned over the years. Such articles dat back to the late 1890's may still be present along the trails because of the rela­ tively slow rate of oxidation and decomposition due to low precipitation a.nd lo·H n::>en annu2l tc~i'Dpc:rutures.

Rl:I_J\,TED 11IS~i'OitiC RI'TI:~S

No sites associe,ted vJi th these routes have been placed on the National Register of Historic Place.s. Hm·Jever, the historical resources of the tovm of l

The pipeline construction camp is located on the same site as the his­ toric town of Coldfoot and no historic buildings remain.

Although the population d':vindled steadily, some persons remained in Bettles until the middle 1950's. However, with the development of a major airfield (1945) Hnd new town of Bettles five miles upriver from the his­ toric townsite, old Be ttl er-; is today a ghost to-vm. Hany old structures and implcrtents £~re still

Several old buildings datin['. bf~ck to the 1906 rush to the Chandalar are also still stand at the deserted site of Caro on the Chandalar River.

It is not lmovm if 2ny evidence of the hi";toric Army s of FoTt Gibbons and Fort Hamlin on the Yukon River exists. Similarly, the exis­ tence of historic evidence of the settlements of Be.rgman, Arctic City and Peavey on the Koyukuk aud several camps on the South Fork is not knov.rrt.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE

In relation to other gold mining areas of Alaska and the Yukon such as the Klondike, Nome, Fairbanks, and Iditarod, the Koyukuk and Chandalar distr:l.cts \vere not major gold producers, nor did they attract the numbers of people as did these other areas. Trail use to the Koyukuk and Chandalar areas was correspondingly light. Whereas over 22,000 were reported to go over the Chilkoot Pass Trail to the Klondike in 1897-98 only perhaps 200 persons utilized the Koyukuk trails in a p~ak year. The use of steamers on the Koyukuk also contributed to the light use of overland routes.

17 Total placer gold production in the Koyukuk district in 1970 amounted to just over 300,000 ounces or slightly more than seven mil- lion dollars. Chandalar production amounted to only 29,760 ounces or 780,000 dollars. In addition, some additional gold in the form of lode deposits was produced in the Chandalar district. The Koyukuk production represents approximately 2.3% of the placer production in the Yukon region of Alaska and about 1.4% of the statewide production. Combined with the Chandalar, production amounted to 2.5% of the Yukon region and 1.6% of the statewide totals.

However, the Koyukuk was by far the most important district north of the Arctic Circle. The Koyukuk and Chandalar districts presented perhaps the greatest challenges and hardships for gold seekers than any others in Alaska and the Yukon. The remoteness of the districts and the severe environment presented immense obstacles in the prospecting and working of claims. The cost of equipment and supplies in the Koyukuk and Chandalar districts was among the highest in Alaska due to the ex­ tremely long distances involved and the several breaks in transportation. It is estimated that costs involved in mining reduced the value of gold produced by 50%.

The trails leading to these districts were the most northerly con­ tinuous trail connections in Alaska, stretching 200 air miles north of Fairbanks and 80 air miles north of the Arctic Circle (approximately 67° N. latitude). The mail carriers, miners, and others who mushed these lonely trails with temperatures commonly 40 to 60 degrees belmv zero, demonstrated a rare determination and abiltty to. survive incredible hardships and contribute to one of the final chapters of America's frontier history.

18 D. PRESENT MID PROSPECTIVE TRAIL USES Mill E!:-rviRO!'JHENT

None of the historic route segments are currently being publicly main­ tained as trails. Yet, many of the various segments have received continued or modern day use by vehicles and are discernable and passable in vrinter over large sections. Summer vehicular use and even pedestrian use is limited to only a few short discontinuous segments due to the presence of low brush, tussocks, muskeg and marshy areas, stream crossings and other obstacles which are covered by snow and ice.

The recently constructed gravel road from the Yukon River to Alaska's North Slope is superimposed ot closely parallels the old Da11 River route to Coldfoot and the sled road from Coldfoot to \-Jiseman.

SCENIC, RECREAT~:ONAL QUALITIES

Most of the various route segments from the Yukon River to the base of the Brooks Range near Coldfoot and near Caro possess moderate scenic values. In comparison to other areas of Alaska, the low mountains, ridges, and flats of the Yukon River interior are not generally thought of as having special beauty or distinctive visual features.

The Brooks Range, on the other hand, possesses exceptional scenic values and has recel.ved considerable acclaim for its stark, rugged beauty. Broad, lm..--lying foref.Jted valleys dramatically contrast Hith the sweeping alpine tundra and barren rock outcroppings on steeply pitched adjacent slopes and towering peaks. Clear-water rivers and streams are numerous and provide much different esthetics from the glacial rivers so common in all the other major mountain ranges in Alaska. The historic route between Coldfoot and Caro and between Coldfoot and Chandalar Lake is highly scenic, especially that segment in the Slate Creek divide area.

HO'-'ever, much of this route is located along the rivers within very broad valleys on the southern flank of the Brooks Range. Hany other areas of the Brooks Range are of greater scenic value including the old and more modern local mining trails located north of the Coldfoot-Care route in the Big Lake vicinity. In this area and in others in the Brooks Range, valleys are narrower, mountains are higher, and a greater sensation of being "in the mountains11 exists.

Another segment of high scenic value exists along the old Chatanika­ Beaver trail between the Elliott Highv.ray and the southern edge of the Yukon Flats. The old trail through the Beaver and Victoria Creek areas traverses a variety of vegetative zones from large white spruce forests along the extremely transparent rivers to sweeping alpine tundra across the drainage divides. The exposed limestone outcroppings along the peaks and ridges

19 of the l-.lbite Mountains forn1 a striking scenic backdrop along most of this trail section.

Over most of the va:ctous routes a wilderness environment exists. Opportunities for recreating and vie'idng plants and animals in a natural setting, largely undis~:urbed by man, is exc(~llent. The recreational values associated with wilderness are quite rare nationally although more cormnon in Al

Obstacles to recreation are significant over these routes. Except for the Chatdnika-Beaver segment, the routes are presently accessible only by con:mercial and cllarter air se;rvice. Summer o\rcrland travel along most of the routes except in a few short alpine areas is extremely difficult, if not impossible. Thickets, "'indfalls, tussocks, lakes, muskegs, marshes, mosquitoes, ::~nd other obstacles continually impe.de travel. Hinter offers far superior trave1 conditions although the severe cold, dee.p snOY.'; remoteness, and long distances severely limit recreational use to only the very hardy.

The use of the historic trails by modern day "cats" and ATV's has in some cases changed the character of the immediate trail area substantially. The enlarged trail width, the cutting, knocking dotvn, or scraping of vege­ tation, 11 cat 11 tracks and other signs of the mechanized age detract from the historical and primitive recreational values in places.

Similarly, the construction of the gravel road from the Yukon River to the North Slope has diminished vJilderness and historic values consid­ erably. The road, if and ·when opened to the public, would also improve access to some of the trail areas.

RECREAT;t:ONAL USES

The only significant recreational use presently occurring on any of the route segments is bet~;.Teen the Elliott Higl:nvay at approximately Hile 22 and the Big Bend area of Beaver Creek. A trail follo'YTS the old route approximately 20 miles do>,Tfl Hickersham Creek to a BLH public use cabin on Beaver Creek. From the cabin area the trail continues dovm Beaver Creek approximately five miles to the "Big Bend" area of Beaver Creek. This trail receives significant use by snowmachiners~ cross­ country skiers and dog mushers~ especially in the late winter and early spring months (February-April). Open water caused by springs in the Big Bend area provides winter grayling fishing.

A 22-mile su!Tl!ller trail generally paralleling the \-linter tra,il has been recently constructed by Bl}f on a nearby ridge above the Wicker­ sham Creek valley. This trail bas received some use by hikers during summer months, although the trail is, as yet, in only fair condition.

20 Some non-trail oriented recreational use is also probably occurring. Fly-in fishing and hunting is widespread over the region and some light use probably takes place on or adjacent the various routes.

With the exception of the trails into Beaver Creek from the Elliott Highway, recreational trail-oriented use is not anticipated to increase significantly over the next several years.

NON-RECREATIONAL USES

Various segments of the historic routes are currently used as basic transportation arteries. The old Dall Creek route and the sled road from Coldfoot to Wiseman has been overlain or closely paralleled by a gravel highway. This road is currently being used in construction of the trans­ Alaska oil pipeline and is scheduled to be opened to the public in 1977 or after the pipeline construction is finished.

The trail segment from Allakaket to Bettles is heavily used in the winter months by snow machiners. In addition, to the travel from Allakaket to the store and other services in Bettles and to the visiting of friends and relatives, the trail provides access for subsistence hunting, trapping, and wood-cutting. A short segment of the trail south from Allakaket towards Tanana (Fort Gibbon ) is also used in winter subsistence activities, primarily by snowmachines and to a lesser extent by dog teams.

Snowmachines and a few dog teams also utilize the historic route a short distance north of Tanana in hunting, trapping, and wood-cutting activities. A military radar installation is located several miles north of Tanana and may utilize portions of the historic route in local access and functions of the site.

The villagers of Beaver also depend heavily on subsistence activities, and the segments of the Beaver-Caro wagon road and the Chatanika-Beaver trail are traveled for many miles north and south of the village in win­ ter hunting, trapping, and wood-cutting activities. This use is primarily by snow machine, although a few dog teams may still be used. Some summer use of the Beaver-Caro wagon road by ATV or on foot may be occurring north of Beaver although brush, marshy ground and stream crossings impede most travel for more than a few miles.

Mining continues on a small scale in the Wiseman and Chandalar Lake areas. Portions of the historic routes are occasionally traversed by "cats" and other heavy equipment and ATV's used in mining operations and in supplying field camps.

Future selections of public domain lands by natives and the state could result in additional non-recreational use of lands along the route. Resource development by the state and native corporations is expected.

21 The proposed extensions of the transportation system by the State of Alaska as of July 1973 include two routes which involve segments of the historic routes. A road is proposed from the existing pipeline road to Kobuk which would pass through Bettles and Allakaket. This route would cross and, at other places, pass near the old route between Alla­ kaket and Bettles. Another road would connect Arctic Village with the pipeline road. This road would follow the old Coldfoot-Care route from the pipeline road to the }Iiddle Fork of the Chandalar, then up that river and over a divide into the East Fork o£ the Chandalar drainage.

A preliminary, conceptual analysis of transportation and utility systems in Alaska released by the Bureau of Land Management in October 1974 recommends a number of corridors be reserved for such systems. Several of these involve the historic routes. A corridor for a number of transportation and utility modes is proposed from the pipeline road through Bettles and Allakaket to Kotzebue and the Seward Peninsula. A railroad corridor is proposed which would generally follow the Fort Gibbon-Koyukuk trail from Allakaket to Tanana. A corridor for an oil pipeline and gas pipeline is recommended from the pipeline road up the Yukon River, across the historic Beaver-Care sled road in the Beaver area, and up the Porcupine River. An alternative route for a highway, gas pipeline, and oil pipeline is recommended which would follow the Middle Fork of the Chandalar from its headwaters then down the Chandalar past Caro to Fort Yukon.

22 E. CONCLUSIONS - RECOMMENDATIONS

QUALIFICATION FOR NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DESIGNATION

The National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543, October 2, 1968) authorized criteria to be used in the evaluation of potential additions to the system. The following guidelines apply to National Scenic Trails under which system this historic route(s) is being con­ sidered:

Criterion: Because of their special characteristics, National Scenic Trails should be nationally significant and be capable of attracting visi.tors from throughout the United States.

Findings: The overland trails and routes to the Koyukuk and Chandalar gold districts >vere traveled very lightly, even during "boom" years. These districts, although the most important north of the Arctic Circle, were quite modest in terms of numbers of stampeders, miners and amount of production in comparison to other gold districts in Alaska. These trails and routes could not be considered nationally significant. Be­ cause of the remoteness, general lack of major scenic and historical attraction, and arduous trail conditions (both winter and summer), these routes would not,in all likelihood, attract visitors from through­ out the United States.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails are designated for hiking and other compatible uses. The National Trails System Act prohibits the use of motorized equipment on these trails.

Findings: Historic travel along. the route took the path of least resistence rather than a particularly scenic route. In addition, most of the route segments were used primarily in winter months when snow and ice covered obstacles, open water, and rough terrain. Most of the historic Koyukuk and Chandalar routes have low potential for summer hiking use. Winter non-mechanized recreational use such as cross­ country skiing and dog is presently only occurring over one 20-mile segment and potential for greater use appears low over remain­ ing segments.

Snowmachines are presently used as basic transportation and in subsistence activities along segments of the historic routes near Tanana, Allakaket, Bettles (Evansville) and Beaver. Heavy equipment and ATV's have utilized portions of the routes in connection with mining and mineral survey activities.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails of historical importance should adhere as accurately as possible to their principal historic routes.

23 Findings: The Dall Creek route and the historic sled road from Cold­ foot to Nolan (Wiseman) has been overlain or closely paralleled by a gravel highway. Except in this area, the historic routes are generally undeveloped and a trail could be constructed which would adhere closely to the historic routes.

Criterion: As far as practical, national scenic trails should avoid highways, motor roads, mining areas, power transmission lines, commercial and industrial development, range fences, and other activities that could detract from scenic interest.

Findings: Except along the Dall Creek route and between Coldfoot and Wiseman, no major developments exist along the routes.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be provided with adequate public access through connecting local or regional trails. Access should. be located at reasonable intervals to provide for tr of various lengths.

Findings: Surface transportation currently exists only to the Chatanika­ Beaver trail segment at Mile 22 of the Elliott Highway. If and when the pipeline road is opened to the public, surface access would be available to the segment from Bettles to Wiseman and to the Coldfoot-Care route at Coldfoot. Air access exists at a few scattered airfields and bush strips. A connecting trail system and access at periodic points along the routes would be extremely costly, difficult, and impractical to construct.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be primarily land based.

Findings: The routes to the Koyukuk and Chandalar districts were pri- L­ marily land based.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be extended trails, usually several hundred miles or more in length.

Findings: The historic trail from Fort Gibbon to Coldfoot and Nolan Oviseman) was over 250 miles long. The route from Chatanika through Beaver to Caro was nearly 200 miles in length. The segment from Caro \­ to Coldfoot was 85 miles long. Other segments totaled several hundred additional miles.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be continuous for their entire length.

Findings: A continuous trail following the historic route(s) could be L constructed. /

24 POTENTIAL FOR FURTHER IN-DEPTH STUDY

The various trails and routes leading to the Koyukuk and Chandalar gold strikes were found not to be of national significance and to possess generally low potential for recreational use. Because these trails and routes do not meet the criteria of being nationally significant, capable of attracting visitors from throughout the United States, and having good potential for development as a hiking or similar use trail, further in­ depth study of these trails and routes as potential National Scenic Trails is not warranted.

RECmfi.IEliDATIONS

1. It is recommended that no further study be made of the Koyukuk­ Chandalar routes as potential National Scenic Trails at this time.

2. It is recommended that as the various federal and state agencies develop recreational plans for those areas adjacent the new pipe­ line road, that consideration be given to developing trails from the road along short segments of the historic routes in those areas of high scenic values such as the Coldfoot and Wiseman areas.

3. Several historic townsites exist along the routes which contain buildings and other remnants dating back to the gold rush era. Because the potential is great for loss of these historic remains, it is recoiT~ended that the land managing agencies work with any private land owners in developing a plan for historic preservation and possibly national designation for the town sites of Wiseman (Nolan), old Bettles, and Caro.

25 F. INFO&~TIONAL SOURCES

All of the following references were not fully researched or utilized. They represent all the possible informational sources which surfaced during the course of this initial study effort for the Ko~Jkuk-Chandalar trails and routes. There are undoubtedly more sources.

In addition to these documental sources, there are many per­ sons still living having first-hand knowledge of the routes. Infor­ mation from such persons is invaluable to any study effort.

26 BIBLIOGRAPHY - KOYUKUK-CI~ALAR ROUTES

Alaska Road Commission, Annual Reports, 1906-1925.

"Map showing Existing & Proposed New Trails North, South, and \vest of Beaver, Alaska" compiled under the direction of Karl Theile, Secretary of Territorial Board of Road Commission, September 1922.

Alaska State Department of Highways: Map, "Alaska Planning Map - Proposed Extension of Transportation System," July 1973.

------:-:-----Maps and computer index, "Alaska Existing Trail System," 1974.

Allen, Lt. Henry T. Report of an Expedition to the Copper~ Tanana & Koyukuk Rivers in the Territory of Alaska in 1885. u.s. Army, Department of the Columbia, 1887.

Bettles, Gordon. "First Surgery on the Koyukuk," Alaska Life, July 1941.

Brooks, Alfred H. Blazing Alaska's Trails, 1953.

Bureau of Land Hanagement. Hultimodal Transportation & Utili!Z Corridor Systems in Alaska, October 1974.

Carlson, Phyllis D. "The Koyukuk," The Alaskana, III, No. 1, March 1973, 4-5.

Couch, James S. Philately Below Zero, A Postal History of Alaska, 1953.

Hill, George M. "The Koyukuk. One of the richest districts in the Far North," Alaska-Yukon Magazine, VIII, June 1909, 210-13.

Kitchener, L.D. Flag Over the North, 1954.

Marshall, Robert. Arctic Village, 1933.

Resource Planning Team, Joint Federal-State Land-Use Planning Commission for Alaska. Resources of Alaska, a regional summary, July 1974.

Ricks, Melvin B. Directory of Alaska Post Offices and Postmasters, 1965.

Sherwood, Morgan B. Exploration of Alaska, 1865-1900, 1965.

27 Thompson, Linda Kay, Bureau of Land Hanagement. A Historical Study of the Wiseman Histot:ic District, Hay 1, 1972.

U.S. Bureau of Mines. "Alaska Placer Gold Production, 1880-1970."

u.s. Geological Survey. Annual Repor~ 21, 1900.

Bulletins 225 (1904), 259 (1905, 284 (1905), 314 (1907), 345 (1908), 379 (1909), 442 (1910), 480 (1911), 520 (1912), 532 (1913), 536 (1913), 542 (1913), 592 (1914), 622 (1915), 642 (1916)' 649 (1916), 662 (1918, 712 (1920), 722 (1922), 77 3 (1925).

Professional Paper 20, 1904 (Schrader).

U.S. Department of the Interior. Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, Draft Environmental Statement, December 18, 1973.

Beaver Creek National Wild River, Draft Environmental Statement, December 18, 1973.

Wickersham, James. Old Yukon, Tales, Trails and Trials~ 1938.

Williams, Ida. "Nolan on the Koyukuk," Alaska-Yukon Magazine X, August 1910, 221.

28 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF OUTDOOR RECREATION Alaska Field Office 524 W. 6th, Suite 201 Anchorage, Alaska 99501

November 20, 1974

GOLD RUSH TR.I\.ILS STUDY/WASHINGTON·-ALASK..t\. MILITARY CABLE AND TELEGRAPH SYSTEH (WAHCATS) PRRLll1INARY DRAFT

The National Trails System Act of 1968, Public Law 90-543, author­ ized the establishment of a nationwide system of recreation and scenic trails to help provide for ever increasing outdoor recrea­ tion needs. The Appalachian and Pacific Crest Trails were desig­ nated in the Act as the initial components of the system. Fourteen additional trails are to be studied for possible :i.nclusion in the system by the Congress. The "Gold Rush Trails" in Alaska were among the trails listed for such study.

Responsibility for studying the Gold Rush Trails has been assigned to the Alaska Field Office of the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. After a meeting with state and federal agencies and contacts with interested organizations and private citizens, seven gold rush trails in Alaska were selected in January, 1974, for initial study: The Chilkoot Trail, the vfuite Pass Trail, the Dalton Trail, the Seward-Nome Route (Iditarod Trail), the Valdez-Fairbanks Trail, The Valdez-Eagle Trail and the Telegraph Route (ivashington-Alaska }1ilitary Cable and Telegraph System), and the Wiseman Trail. Over the past year, studies have been underway on these trails and routes to determine their suitability for inclusion in the National Scenic Trails System and their potential for further in-depth study • .... Prior to compilation of a complete report on the trails, we are extremely interested in obtaining input and comments from those persons having specific knowledge or interest in one or more of the particular trails or routes. Enclosed for your review is a draft of the preliminary report on the \>Jashington-Alaska Hilitary Cable and Telegraph System. We would appreciate any comments or suggestions you may have by December 20, 1974. If you know of other • groups or persons in addition to those on the attached mailing list who may have pertinent information or comments, please feel free to contact them or let us knmv.

Thank you for your help.

4) /. ;1 /, " /] -· / /?.A/'{. .C.<-r1 rr' /"~: J /.e ~-}·~~---.;..--' "!illiam R. Thomas Chief, Alaska Field Office M a i 1 i n g L i s t

GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY/WASHINGTON-ALASKA MILITARY CABLE JWD TELEGRAPH SYSTEM (WAliCATS)

State Director, National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska State Director, Bureau of Land Nanagement, Anchorage, Alaska The Director, Alaslr.a Division of Parks, Anchorage, Alaska Pete Cizmich, Land Coordinator, Alaska Dept. of Fish & Came, Anchorage, Alaska The Hon. B.A. Campbell, Com.11issioner, Alaska Dept. of Highways, Juneau, Ak. The Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation, Juneau, Alaska The Exec.Sec. Alaska Am. Revolution Bicentennial Commission, Anchorage, Ak. Robert Frederick, Ak. Historical Commission, Anchorage, Alaska Area Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife, Anchorage, Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service, Juneau, Ak. Robert Pavitt, Director of Planning & Research, Office of the Governor, Juneau, Ak. Fed.-State Cochairmen, Fed.-State Land Use Planning Commission, Anchorage, Ak. Don Blasko, Bureau of Mines, Anchorage, Alaska USGS, Division Water Resources, Anchorage, Alaska Lou Haller, BLH Anchorage District Office, Anchorage, Alaska Alaska Historical Society, College, Alaska Eagle Historical Society, Eagle, Alaska Tanana-Yukon Historical Society, Fairbanks, Alaska Tok Historical Society (Mrs. John Burns), Chicken, Alaska Valdez Historical Society, Valdez, Alaska Alaska Conservation Society, College, Alaska Fairbanks North Star Borough, Planning Dept., Fairbanks, Alaska Anchorage Center for the Environment, Anchorage, Alaska Fairbanks Center of the Environment, Fairbanks, Alaska Doyon Native Corp., Fairbanks, Alaska AHTNA, Inc., Copper Center, Alaska University of Alaska, (Claus Naske, Dept. of History), College, Alaska Robert DeArmond, Ed. Alaska Journal_, Juneau~ Alaska F.S. Pettyjohn, Ed. Alaskana, Anchorage, Alaska vJalter Blue, Historian, U.S. Army, Fort Richardson, Anchorage, Alaska State Historical Library (Dick Engen, Dir.}, Juneau, Alas~a Director Loussac Library, Anchorage, Alaska Jerry Timmons, BI11 Area Office, Tok, Alaska Hr. & Hrs. Robert Clifton, Box 89, Valdez, Alaska 99686 President, Village Council, Eagle Village, Alaska President, Village Council, Tanacross, Alaska President, Village Council, Hentasta Lake, Alaska President, Village Council, Chistochina, Alaska President, Village Council, Gakona, Alaska President, Village Council, Culkana, Alaska President, Village Council, Healy Lake, Alaska President, Village Council, Dot Lake, Alasl~:.<'l President, City Council, Big Delta, Alaska Bill Quirk, III, 3703 Lois Dr. Anchorage, Alaska 99503 President, City Council, Eagle, Alaska I. WASHINGTON-ALASKA MILITARY CABLE AND TELEGRAPH SYSTEM A. LOCATION AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT

BACKGROUND

With the influx of thousands of miners into Alaskan and Canadian gold fields the need for a reliable, speedy means of com­ munication with the outside became paramount in the late 1890's. To send a message from the interior of Alaska to Washington, D.C. and receive a reply generally required a year's time. Accordingly, on May 26, 1900, the Congress appropriated $450,550 to connect Ft. St. Michael with all other Alaskan Military Posts by military telegraph and cable.

By the fall of 1901, some 605 miles of the Washington­ Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System (WAMCATS) were connect­ ing Ft. St. Michael-Unalakleet-Kaltag and Ft. Gibbon. Ft. Egbert at Eagle was connected to the Canadian telegraph system at Dawson and 37 miles of line were constructed northward form Ft. Liscum at Valdez to the Copper River valley by the new Thompson Pass route. At the same time submarine cables were being laid to connect Skag­ way and Juneau.

On August 24, 1902, the 428 miles of land line connecting Ft. Egbert and Ft. Liscum were completed. After considerable effort to locate a good route eastward across the Yukon Flats from Ft. Gibbon, it was decided to route the line to the south up the Tanana River connecting to the existing Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum line at Kechumstuk in the Fortymile country. This connection was completed on June 27, 1903. During 1903, submarine cable connecting Ft. Seward and Skagway and between Sitka and Juneau became operational. For the first time direct communication from Alaska and the rest of the United States was possible with the aid of the Canadian lines extending from Dawson.

A submarine cable connecting Seattle and Ft. Liscum became operational in October, 1904. This deleted the necessity for transmitting all messages from Alaska through the Canadian link via Dawson and Vancouver. The WAMCATS net comprised 1,497 miles of.land telegraph line, 2,124 miles of submarine cable, and 107 miles of wireless (Table 1). In 1906 some 2,347 miles of submarine cable, 1,375 miles of land line and a 107-mile wireless link across Norton Sound com­ prised the WAMCATS network. The estimated costs were: $1,144,907 for the submarine cable ($481 per mile) and $848,375 for land lines ($617 per mile). In 1907, it became evident that maintenance costs for the land lines were exceedingly high and that wireless communi­ cations appeared feasible. In 1911, the Gulkana-Ft. Egbert telegraph TABLE I

Lc.nd Line Stations

Intermediate Total Intermediate Total Nome-Ketchumstuk (miles) (Miles) Eagle-Valdez (miles) (miles)

Nome 0 0 Ft Egbert(Eagle) 0 0 Fort Davis 4 4 Champion Creek 29 29 Safety 20 24 North Fork 39 68 St. Michael 0 24 Gold Creek 19 87 Golsovia 35 59 Ketchumstuk 11 98 Unalakleet 30 89 Dennison Creek 30 128 Old Woman 50 139 Tanana Crossing 25 153 Kaltag 45 184 Big Tokio 31 184 Nulato 40 224 Mentasta Pass 20 204 Koyukuk 30 254 Cheslotta 20 224 Grimkop 20 274 Chistochina 26 250 Louden 30 304 Talsona 20 270 Melozi 35 339 Gulkana 20 290 Kokrines 38 377 Copper Center 26 316 Briches 40 417 Tons ina 25 341 Ft. Gibbon (Tanana) 55 472 Teikhell 24 365 Cosna 45 517 Sa ina 24 389 Baker 25 542 Keystone 19 408 "·••"'- Tolovana 37 579 Valdez 12 420 Nenana 55 634 Lowe River 3 423 Chena 48 682 Ft Liscum(Valdez) 5 428 Fairbanks 10 692 Salcha 37 729 Goodpaster 60 789 Ft Ezbert-Boundarx Central 32 821 Ft Egbert 0 0 Summit 58 879 Boundary 11 11 Ketchumstuk 54 933

Ram2art Branch Wireless Section Ft. Gibbon 0 0 Port Safety 0 0 Rapids 35 35 St. Michael 107 107 Rampart 40 75 Glen 35 110 Baker 15 125 line, totaling some 290 miles was abandoned in favor of wireless with an estimated savings of $50,000 annually. By 1915, there were only 848 miles of land line in operation within Alaska. A major portion of this comprised the Ft. Liscum (Valdez) to Fair­ banks along the 375 mile long Valdez to Fairbanks trail (Richard­ son Highway). In 1923, the military recommended transferring the Valdez-Fairbanks WAMCATS line to the Alaska Road Commission and that the line be converted to telephone service. The final trans­ fer of the Valdez-Fairbanks telegraph line took place on September 1, 1926. This left only the 11 mile Alaskan segment of the Ft. Egbert-Dawson telegraph land line under military control.

Operation and maintenance of the WAMCATS land lines re­ quired establishment of small military detachments at approximate­ ly 40-mile intervals with shelter cabins in between for emergency shelter for repair crews. At its peak there were 52 telegraph stations used by WAMCATS. These combined with the intermediate shelter cabins comprised in excess of 150 government structures in the Alaskan wilderness.

When WAMCATS was originally constructed almost the entire Alaskan interior was without a regular network of roads or main­ tained trails and much of the line was constructed through areas marked on charts as "unexplored". Material and supplies for land based telegraph lines were moved by pack animals from central points on navigable waterways and the coast. Thus rolls of #9 galvanized telegraph wire, insulators, nails and other construc­ tion materials as well as supplies for the military construction crews and pack animals were moved laboriously hundreds of miles over mountains, through muskeg swamps and across swift glacial and non-glacial streams. Much of the disbursement of supplies from central points took place during the winter when cross-country travel was more feasible because swamps, lakes and rivers were clad in ice. Even though temperatures often went to more than -50°F, winter construction was also favored because of the lack of the mosquito.

In addition to the hazards and challenge of overcoming adverse weather and terrain, the construction of a telephone line with the customary single pole was often prohibited by permafrost. An ordinary telegraph pole lasted no more than a year because al­ ternating freezing and thawing quickly skewed poles toward the sun because of the differential soil conditions between the shaded and sunny side of the pole. A tripod of slender poles wired, nailed or pegged together successfully overcame the frost heaving conditions in permafrost areas. GENERAL ALIGID1ENT

During 1972, 1973, and 1974, various segments of the WAMCATS land based route were examined. Special attention was given to segments between Unalakleet and Kaltag (see Iditarod discussion) and between Eagle-Fairbanks-Valdez. Sections of the line along the Yukon River downstream from Rampart are still visible from the air, especially in the Ruby-Galena area. Por­ tions of the Dawson-Eagle line were examined by air and between the mouth of the Fortymile River in Canada and Eagle on-the­ ground. Much of the line in the Fortymile drainage south of Eagle has been examined firsthand during interagency field work on the Fortymile River. The Bureau of Land Management has done substantial work on the WAMCATS line south of Eagle.

LENGTH Three segments of the land based WAMCATS line are con­ sidered in detail in this analysis.

Ft. Egbert to Slana (±220 miles)

Kechumstuk to the in the vicinity of Quartz Lake (±145 miles)

Ft. Egbert to Dawson, Y.T. Canada (11 miles in Alaska, approx.lOO in Canada)

A fourth section comprising approximately 20 miles south of Tonsina through Kimball Pass is discussed under the Valdez-Fair­ banks Trail. A fifth section compri.sing some 95 miles between Unalakleet and Kaltag is discussed under the Iditarod Trail.

REGIONAL CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY, VEGETATION

The climate associated with the Eagle area is character­ ized by cold, hard winters and warm summers with long hours of daylight. During the winter, extended periods with temperatures at or below -35°F are common. Periods where the temperature drops to -50°F are not unusual. Generally the winters are noted for the lack of wind, hence the wind chill factor is not as serious as in other parts of Alaska. Summers are warm with temperatures reaching 70°F and occasionally 90°F. Freezing temperatures can occur during any month. Thunderstorms are common and normally localized. Topography is varied, ranging from the gently rolling hills of the Yukon Tanana Upland immediately south of Eagle to narrow river and stream valleys, to the extensive flood plain of the Tanana River. A major muskeg area is found in the Mosquito Flats area of the Fortymile River. Elevation ranges from less than 1,000 feet at Eagle to 4,000 feet in the Fortymile drainage back to 1,500 feet in the Tanana Valley, back to almost 4,000 feet in Indian Pass just north of Slana. Vegetation is variable ranging from alpine tundra to mixed spruce-birch forests along the water courses.

LAND USES AND ACCESS

Overall land use in the area is extensive being asso­ ciated with mining, hunting, fishing and trapping. Major excep­ tions are at the communities of Eagle, Big Delta. Tanacross, and Mentasta Lake,

Public access to the segments is possible from the Richardson, Glenn and Taylor Highways. Most of the route north of the Richardson Highway is not readily accessible by auto.

GENERAL LAND OWNERSHIP

The legal status of the right-of-way used by WAMCATS is not known. At this time the bulk of the land adjoining these seg­ ments of WAMCATS is administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

Several important segments of WAMCATS and associated structures are within the proposed boundary of the Fortymile Wild and Scenic River (Draft Environmental Impact Statement DES 73-109). A small but undetermined portion of the total length is included with mining claims and existing highway rights-of-way. Key por­ tions are included within areas classified for potential selection by alaskan natives under the provisions of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. Land status of the Canadian segment between Eagle and Dawson is unknown. Several of the main telegraph stations and emergency line cabins are included in private applications filed by Alaskan Native under the provisions of the 1906 Native Allot­ ment Act while others are claimed as winter trapping quarters.

The Alaskan Department of Highways in its compilation of existing public trails filed with the Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission in May, 1974, shows that much of the WAMCATS is an existing public trail. B. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE

HISTORY OF ESTABLISHMENT

One of the most important and lasting events associated with the discovery of gold in Alaska and the ensuing gold rushes was the development of a communications system which tied together far-flung gold fields and military posts within Alaska and linked them with the remainder of the United States. The Washington­ Alaska Military Cable System authorized by the Congress on May 26, 1900, commemorates an unparalleled effort in the annals of telegraphic engineering in its scope and the challenges of con­ struction and continued operation of reliable. quick communication in an inaccessible, often unknown and largely uninhabited region that became the 49th State.

The Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System was necessary and vital for the operation of military forts in Alaska and in providing Alaska with direct communication with the rest of the United States during the latter phases of the Alaskan gold rush. The segments involving connections between Ft. Egbert and the United States-Canada border, Ft. Egbert and Ft. Liscum, and the Ft. Gibbon-Kechumstuk represent the most significant and key land elements of WAMCATS. The first messages from Alaska were telegraphed over the Canadian interconnections via Ft. Egbert in 1901. By 1902, Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum connection became the primary telegraph communication link with the rest of the United States. In 1903, the Ft. Gibbon linkage to the Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum line at Kechumstuk completed direct telegraphic communication between all mainland forts in Alaska and the outside world. Ft. Egbert and Kechumstuk remained the principal transfer points on the land network until October 1904, when a submarine telegraphic cable connecting Ft. Liscum and Seattle removed the need to funnel all messages through Canada via the Ft. Egbert-Dawson line.

High priority was given to the early completion of WAH­ CATS with the Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum receiving major attention. This vital segment followed an existing route to the Yukon gold fields used in 1885. It was not, however, until after the fabu­ lous Klondike strike in the Canadian portion of the Yukon that subsequently became Dawson that Ft. Egbert to Ft. Liscum overland connection was actually constructed (see discussion of Eagle­ Valdez-Fairbanks Military trails).

Capt. George Burnell of the U.S. Army Signal Corps started construction of the line north from Ft. Liscum in July, 1900. Only 37 miles over the rugged Thompson Pass into the Copper River valley were completed before summer made the muskeg im­ passable. Similar construction was to start southward from Ft. Egbert, but little actual progress was made. Therefore, in the summer of 1901, a promissing First Lieutenant was reassigned from the Philippine Insurrection to Ft. Egbert. That young First Lieu­ tenant - William "Billy" Mitchell - played an instrumental role in the final construction of the land telegraph linkage of WAMCATS.

Lieutenant Mitchell worked out of Ft. Egbert between 1901 and 1903, and was personally involved in the vital land link­ ages considered herein. He first determined that the only feasible way to combat the muskeg quagmires of summer was to do the bulk of the line construction and supply distribution during the winter. During the winter of 1902, construction supplies were sledded south­ ward from Ft. Egbert where they had been brought by boat. On Au­ gust 24, 1902, Lt. Mitchell's construction crews met construction crews moving northward from the Copper River valley. This meeting point, near the present community of Tanacross, provided the first direct telegraphic connection between Ft. Liscum and Ft. Egbert.

During this same period military construction and survey crews had been unsuccessfully seeking a route along the Yukon from Ft. Gibbon to Circle and then Ft. Egbert and Eagle. On January 1, 1903, Lt. Mitchell discovered an alternate route through the Good­ paster River drainage to the Tanana River. At that time even the local Indians were not familiar with the Goodpaster area in its entirety. Upon returning to Ft. Egbert, some 300 tons of supplies were sledded 95 miles to the head of the Goodpaster at a point now called Summit. From that point construction started in both direc­ tions; one toward the existing Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum telegraph line at Kechumstuk; while the other started toward construction crews working upstream on the Tanana River from Ft. Gibbon. By the last of April 1903, the lines were completed from Kechumstuk to the Tanana in the vicinity of Quartz Lake. Here Lt. Mitchell expected to make the Ft. Gibbon connection. Unexpected problems encountered by the Ft. Gibbon crews left them some 65 miles downstream. Accord­ ingly, Lt. Mitchell continued on downstream to Salcha where on June 27, 1903 - three days before the Congressional authorization to spend Federal money expired - WAMCATS became a reality with some 1,506 miles of overland line and a few miles of submarine cable.

Almost all of the construction of WAMCATS took place when there were at best only primitive trails and virtually no wagon roads. The principal means of getting supplies to the major distribution points was by boat. From there everything moved on horse, dog or man, preferably in the winter when temperatures were often below -50°F. Hardships endured by man and animal were extreme as the line was built across the 11 unexplored" bulk of interior Alaska. Supplies for the northern portion of the 428 mile long Ft. ~gbert-Ft. Liscum line were hauled southward some 168 miles from Ft. Egbert and 260miles northward from Ft. Liscum to their meeting point near Tanacross. Supplies for the 273 mile Kechumstuk-Salcha link also were distributed southward from Ft. Egbert.

Estimated construction costs of the land telegraph lines as of 1906, were $617 per mile while annual maintenance cost $6.25 per mile.

Maintenance and message relays along overland routes involved construction of stations at 40 mile intervals. Here were gathered a military detachment composed of a Signal Corps repair­ man and two assistants. Transportation was by foot and mule during the summer and generally by foot and dog sled in winter. Shelter cabins were also constructed by the Army at intervals between main stations. The location of these were determined by terrain and severity of weather.

During one early year there were over 200 interruptions in WAMCATS. These were caused in about equal proportions by blizzards, sleet, wind, forest fires, and vandalism. The task of replacing broken poles or a section of line in Alaska was extremely difficult. Here the two repairmen not only carried their tools and equipment, but also tentage, cooking utensils, bedding, food, and personal gear. After poles were cut, they had to be shoulder carried through muskeg and thick brush. For the year ending June 30, 1906, some 306,454 messages were sent while only 53,116 were for military purposes. This heavy non-military use of WAMCATS had been anticipated in 1900 when the Congress authorized commer­ cial use of Government facilities insofar as the Secretary of War deemed equitable and in the public interest.

PERIOD OF USE

Between 1901, when the first short linkage from Ft. Egbert to the Canadian telegraph system servicing Dawson was fin­ ished, and 1921, almost all telegraphic messages within Alaska and from Alaska to the United States involved portions of the WAMCATS land links between Ft. Egbert at Eagle and Ft. Liscum at Valdez. The first land link, 11 miles along the Yukon River from Ft. Egbert to the United States-Canada border was built in 1901. The second land link, the northern 220 miles of ~he 428 mile Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum line became operational on August 24, 1902, when ~he military construction crews met at what is now Tanacross. Although the southern 138 miles between Gulkana and Ft. Liscum continued in service until 1926, all of the northern route was terminated in 1911. in favor of wireless communication to Ft. Egbert from Alaska.

The third land link, the easterly 145 miles of the 933 mile Nome Kechmstuk line became operational on June 27, 1903. Service over the 145 mile link was terminated prior to 1911 when the main east-west Alaskan telegraphic artery was shifted south­ ward to the Valdez-Fairbanks Trail.

Portions of the original telegraph route also appear to have been used for trail access to the Fortymile gold fields as well as Eagle.

HISTORIC TRAIL REMNANTS

The majority of the area traversed by the three seg­ ments of WAMCATS are largely isolated and appear much as when original construction took place in 1900-03.

Preliminary field examinations indicate substantial portions of these three segments are "in situ". From the air the line locations through spruce forests and over some of the tundra and muskeg areas can be readily determined. Several of the main telegraph stations and intervening shelter cabins have been found structurally intact and still contain military stoves manufactured around 1880. Articles related to military operatiod of WAMCATS are evident and appear to have substantial historical value. For example, the remains of one of the telegraph instru­ ments have been found at one station together with a large supply of green glass insulators from Brookfield, New York. Rolls of telegraph wire have been seen along segments of the line while wire, poles and insulator brackets are still in place.

The Ft. Egbert to Mentasta segment of the Ft. Egbert­ Ft. Liscum line and the Kechumstuk-Goodpaster segment of the Ft. Gibbon-Kechumstuk line have been nominated for FIRST ORDER OF SIGNIFICANCE on the National Register of Historic Places by the Bureau of Land Management. Action on this nomination is not complete.

Included within these three segments are: The Alaska­ Dawson connection; the meeting point of the August 24, 1902, linkage of the Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum line near Tanacross; the main interconnection between telegraphic messages involving vest­ ern Alaskan forts, the rest of Alaska and the outside (Kechumstuk); the successful route deleting the necessity to construct and main­ tain a telegraph line through the heart of the Yukon Flats (Good­ paster); the major supply distribution point for construction of substantial and significant portions of the Ft. Egbert-Ft. Liscum­ Ft. Gibbon-Dawson lines (Ft. Egbert); the primary supply depot and starting point for constructing the Goodpaster line (Summit Station), at least 13 primary telegraph relay stations and an un­ known number of emergency shelters; and substantial tangible evi­ dence of the original line locations as well as alternate routings and key segments where wire insulators and poles remain intact.

RELATED HISTORIC SITES

The Eagle National Historic District, including the entire Ft. Egbert site was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1972. The Eagle area is also a key element of the proposed Yukon-Charley National Rivers extending from the vicinity of the United States border to Circle (DES 73-92).

There are substantial and significant international values associated with the Canadian gold fields at Dawson and Canadian historic and park programs associated with Dawson and the Ft. Cudahay-Fortymile sites.

The Fortymile River, Alaska, including substantial por­ tions of the original WAMCATS line, several relay stations and military shelter cabins, has been recommended by the Secretary of the Interior for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (DES 73-103). If approved by the Congress this river and its immediate environment would be managed by the Bureau of Land Management. Conceptual management and development plans prepared for that proposal highlight the historic significance of WAMCATS and the role of gold mining in the settlement of Alaska.

The abandoned native communities of Joseph and Kechum­ stuk are believed to have substantial Native historic and cultural values. It is presumed that both sites will be placed in Native ownership under the provisions of the Alaska Native Claims Settle­ ment Act.

The Eagle Historic Society, Chicken Historic Society, Alaska Division of Parks, National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Canadian Park Service and several Alaskan Native communities each have key responsibilities and strong interest in the historic and cultural values of this area. C. PRESENT AND PROSPECTIVE TRAIL USES AND ENVIRONMENT

PRESENT TRAIL CONDITION

Most of the WAMCATS overland route involved in the three segments are in a primitive condition having been substan­ tially without maintenance since abandonment around 1911. Small portions, notably in the Mentasta Pass area, Kechumstuk and lower Goodpaster River, have been converted to primitive trails for vehicular access and/or winter haul "roads". Current editions of U.S. Geological Survey Maps indicate a network of "trails" in the upper Fortymile drainage. On the ground inspection of these trails showed that these are the remains of the original telegraph line and that it is doubtful if there is any signifi­ cant amount of wheeled travel.

Through forested areas the slow regeneration of trees where the line was constructed makes aerial survey relatively easy. In alpine and muskeg areas location of the WAMCATS is difficult.

SCENIC, RECREATIONAL QUALITIES

The three segments have a diverse and pleasing array of scenic values ranging from the Yukon and Tanana Rivers to sweeping vistas of the Alaska Range in the tundra divide of the Fortymile drainages.

On the ground checking of original route locations in selected parts of the Fortymile drainage indicates these portions of WAMCATS have substantial public outdoor recreation potential as hiking trails and perhaps horseback trails. Since the WAMCATS line was designed to be serviced on foot, mule, snowshoe or dog sled, adverse terrain features are not too frequent. As a hiking trail some rerouting would be necessary where the line was sus­ pended across some of the steepest ravines or across rivers. A major, and as of now unknown, factor is whether substantial por­ tions of the WAMCATS route across the muskeg flats south of Kechumstuk provide acceptable hiking during the summer.

As these portions of the WAMCATS route are generally well removed from the existing highway network, the route provides non-motorized access into primitive, still largely undeveloped areas. Opportunities to view wildlife ranging from Dall sheep in the higher elevations near Mentasta and Eagle to moose, wolves, caribou and numerous smaller animals are excellent. Similar opportunities would be available to view birds. There are many interesting geological and vegetational features which could be explained to visitors.

RECREATIONAL USES

Except for visitors to the Eagle area. present recreation­ al use of these three segments of WAMCATS are light to absent. Some of the routes a~e used for hunter access - principally in the Kechumstuk area. There are no estimates of present use; it is assumed that total recreational use of these portions do not exceed 20 recreational days annually. Poor access and lack of public knowledge of WAMCATS are the principal reasons for the light to non-existent recreational use today.

Future potential recreational use could include hiking, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, dog mushing and snow­ shoeing. Although it is conceivable that the route could also be used for recreational snow machine travel during winter or as a bike trail during the summer, such uses do not appear desirable.

NON-RECREATIONAL USES

Portions of the WAMCATS route have been converted to primitive vehicular access routes to summer cabins, hunting camps, fishing areas, mining claims and trapping headquarters. At pre­ sent, these uses involve only a minor portion of the combined 376 miles of WAMCATS route in this analysis.

It is probable that portions of the route are used during the winter for snow machine access to trapping areas. The extent of such use is unknown.

Several of the main relay stations constructed by the military and possibly emergency shelters are included within pend­ ing applications under the 1906 Native Allotment Act. Therefore. it is likely that some of the structures constructed and maintained with Federal funds appropriated for the Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System will pass into private ownership.

The Alaska Department of Highways in July, 1973, sub­ mitted to the Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission (Anchorage) long range plans to construct a highway along this route. It would include a substantial portion of the original, largely unaltered portion of WAMCATS in the Goodpaster drainage and the Fortymile River basin. If these plans should go through, that portion of the trail could be lost; the current status of that proposal, however, is uncertain. D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

QUALIFICATION FOR NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DESIGNATION

The National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543, October 2, 1968) authorized criteria to be used in the evalua­ tion of potential additions to the system. The following guide­ lines apply to National Scenic Trails under which system this historic route is being considered:

Criterion - Route Selection: National Scenic Trails of historical importance should adhere as accurately as possible to the prin­ cipal historic routes and provide for maximum outdoor recreation potential.

Findings: The Ft. Egbert to U.S./Canadian border comprising 11 miles, Ft. Egbert to Slana comprising ±220 miles, and Kechumstuk to Quartz Lake comprising ±145 miles, involve the original loca­ tion of key sections of the Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System. These ±376 miles of trail are of national historic significance in their relationship to the settlement and exploration of Alaska during the stampedes of gold seekers to and from the Alaskan and Canadian gold fields. A wide variety of high quality outdoor recreation opportunities for hiking, horseback riding, cross-country skiing, snowshoeing, dog sledding, nature study and geological study in a largely natural, scenic portion of Alaska is found along these three segments of WAMCATS.

Criterion - Access: National Scenic Trails should be provided with adequate public access at reasonable intervals to provide for trips of various lengths.

Findings: Access to the Eagle-Ft. Egbert area is by auto over the Taylor Highway and by air. A small airstrip at Joseph pro­ vides access to central portion of the Kechumstuk-Quartz Lake segment while the Richardson Highway provides auto access to the Quartz Lake area. The Alaska Highway intersets WAMCATS at Tana­ cross, while the Glenn Highway provides good access in the Men­ tasta-Slana area. The Alaska, Richardson and Glenn Highways are paved roads open to year-round travel. The Taylor Highway is un­ paved and not maintained during the winter months. Criterion - Placement: National Scenic Trails should be prima­ rily land based. Findings: The ± 376 mile segment of WAMCATS is, except for river crossings, land based in its entirety. A major river, the Tanana, is crossed. Several small tributaries to the Fortymile are also crossed.

Criterion - Length: National Scenic Trails should be extended trails. usually several hundred miles or more in length.

Findings: The three interconnected links of WAMCATS comprise a total length of approximately 376 miles.

Criterion - Continuity: National Scenic Trails should be con­ tinuous in their entire length.

Findings: The 376 miles of WAMCATS involved in the three links are interconnected and could be considered as continuous.

CONCLUSION The 376 miles of WAMCATS involving segments between Ft. Egbert and the United States-Canadian border, Ft. Egbert and Slana, and Kechumstuk and Quartz Lake meet the criteria for a National Scenic Trail and would make a worthy addition to the National Trails System.

POTENTIAL FOR FURTHER IN-DEPTH STUDY Initial study confirms that 376 miles of WAMCATS is of historical significance and that there are substantial. high quality public outdoor recreation values associated with its historic route. Further, the overall segments meet the criteria for designation by the Congress as a National Scenic Trail.

Preliminary investigations have raised questions about existing and potential ownership of the WAMCATS route and asso­ ciated structures. There are also questions about summer recrea­ tion potentials of the trail where large muskeg areas exist south of Kechumstuk. The exact location of the original route is un­ certain as there are several different routings where earlier lines were abandoned.

These and related questions of cost and administrative responsibilities need detailed consideration. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that an in-depth study of the 376-mile segment of WAMCATS be made in accordance with Section 5(3)(b) of the National Trails System Act. Such a study would support legis­ lation and would show the following:

1. The proposed alignment of the designated trail(s).

2. The areas adjacent to such a trail(s) to be utilized for scenic, historic, natural, cultural, or developmental purposes.

3. The characteristics which make the proposed trail worthy of designation as a national scenic trail.

4. The current status of land ownerships and current and poten­ tial use along the designated route.

5. The estimated cost of acquisition of lands or interest in lands, if any.

6. The plans for developing and maintaining the trail and the cost thereof.

7. The proposed federal administering agency.

8. The interest of Canada in the potential development of an international foot or horseback trail utilizing the telegraph route between Ft. Egbert, Alaska, and Dawson, Yukon Territory, Canada.

9. The extent to which a State or its political subdivisions and public and private organizations might reasonably be expected to participate in acquiring the necessary lands and in the administration thereof.

10. The relative uses of the land involved, including: the number of anticipated visitor-days for the entire length of, as well as for segments of, such trail; the number of months which such trail, or segments thereof, will be open for recreation purposes; the economic and social benefits which might accrue from alternate land uses; the estimated man-years of civilian employment and expenditures expected for the purposes of maintenance, supervision, and regulation of such trail; and the extent of non-recreational use of snow machines along the route.

11. Any special management or development provisions necessary to protect the visitor during adverse weather. E. INFORMATION SOURCES

Specific information on the Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System is sketchy and the large scale of early maps make on-the-ground location of the route difficult. In several areas short sections of the line were in operation only a few years before maintenance costs dictated alternate rout­ ing, thereby creating several lines connecting the same points. This is especially true in the Joseph to Kechumstuk and Joseph to North Fork areas.

Special recognition is given to the efforts of Robert and Dorothy Clifton, Valdez, Alaska, who made available early maps and plans relating to the Ft. Liscum-Valdez area and to Alaska and the Yukon Territory. Information on these maps formed the basic framework for the location of the telegraph route and relay and shelter cabins. Similarly, the cooperation of ~erry Timmons, BU1 Area Manager, Fortymile Resource Area, Tok, Alaska, is greatly appreciated. Basic information in the files of that office provided essential information on the existing condition of the line as well as several key telegraph relay stations. Mr. William Quirk, III, Anchorage, Alaska, graciously provided copies of materials collected while employed by B LM and an ad­ vance draft of a forthcoming report on the historical aspects of the Eagle-Valdez and Goodpaster sections of WAMCATS.

Substantial information is also available in Eagle, Alaska, where the Eagle Historic Society has assembled data re­ lating to Ft. Egbert. Included are early maps and notes of Lt. Mitchell and records of the Fort and diary of early Eagle resi­ dents and miners in the adjacent gold fields.

The following tabulation of information sources pro­ vides a starting point for those interested in learning more about WAMCATS. These documents have not all been read and are listed in an attempt to develop a detailed bibliography. There are un­ doubtedly other sources. BOB./ATF

B I B L I 0 G R A P H Y

WAMCATS

Alaska Communications System. "t-lashington-Alaska ~filitary Cable and Telegraph System, Oct. 1904." A Map, 1943.

Alaska Road Commission. Annual Report, 1906-1924.

Alaska Road Commission. "Map of the Upper Tanana District," Scale 1:500,000. 1925.

American Geographical Society. "Map of Alaska," 1:1,250,000. Pre­ pared for the Alaska Road Commission, 1923.

Anonymous. "History of WAMCATS, '' The Pathfinder of Alaska, (March, 1925).

Author Unknown. Military Historical Sketch of Ft. Egbert, Alaska. Bureau of Land Management Files Fortymile Resource Area, Tok.

Barnard, E.C. "Map of Alaska," 1904. Scale 1:2,500,000.

Brooks, Alfred Hulse. Blazing Alaska's Trails. Pub. jointly by the Univ. of Alaska and Arctic Institute of North America.

Bureau of Land Management. Nomination of Eagle-Valdez Telesraph Line Routes for National Register of Historic Place. 1972.

Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. Proposed Fortymile Wild, Scenic and Recreation River. DES 73-109, Dec. 18, 1973.

Burton, Pierre. The Klondike Fever: The Life and Death of the Last Gold Rush. Alfred A. Knopf, 1969. Dalton, Lt. A.T. A Military Historical Sketch of Ft. Gibbon, Alaska. Written in connection with Post Graduate Course, Garrison School for Officers, Dept. of the Columbia, June, 1909. 16 pp. "Down the Goodpaster with Lt. Billy Mitchell in 1902," The Alaskana, (Feb. 1973). Edman, Grace, Alice Hudson, Sam Johnson. Fifty Years of Highways. Alaska Dept. of Public Works, Nome, 1960. Farnsworth, Capt. C.S. Papers, 1900-1902. Univ. of Alaska Library, Archives Dept., Fairbanks, Alaska. 100 pp. "Fortymile Unit," Federal Register, (May 9, 1970) • , ... BOI./ATF

Graham, Lt. Harry. Military Historical Sketch of Ft. Egbert, Alaska. Written in connection with the Post Graduate Course, Garrison School for Officers, Dept. of the Columbia. June, 1909, 21 pp.

Greely, Brig. Gen. A.W. Various Stations on the Cables and Land Lines with Intermediate Distances of the Alaska Telegraph System 2 1902-12. Prepared for Gen. Greely, Chief Signal Officer, U.S. Army, 6 pp.

Heller, Herbert L. Sourdough Sagas - Pioneering and Gold in Alaska, 1883-1923.

Hoffman, Joseph E. Keystone Canyon State Park - Proposed Master Plan. Univ. of Alaska, 1970.

Hunt, William R. "A Soldier of Fortune," Journal West, X, No.2, (April, 1971).

Jones, R.D. "The Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System," Alaska-Yukon Magazine, III (1907), 379-388.

Landry, Richard. 11 l'm a Wilderness Hermit," Alaska Sportsman, (Oct. 1941).

"Telegraph Trail, 11 Alaska, (Nov. 1969, Jan. 1970). Lawrence, Guy. "Yukon Telegraph Service," Alaska, 8 parts, (Oct. 1958-May, 1959).

Macdonald, D.A. "Map of tl:e New Gold Fields of Northwestern Alaska,n 1898.

Map: "Reconnaissance Map of the Fairbanks Quadrangle,", 1909; 1:250,000. Map: "The Alaska Railroad, Yanert Fort to Fairbanks," 1924. 1:250,000.

Map: "Yukon Territory, 11 Dept. of the Interior, Canada; 16 miles • 1 inch, 1923. McClain, C. "Gen. Billy Mitchell- Blazing Alaska's Telegraph," The Alaskana, (Feb. 1972).

McQueen. Verden. uAlaska Communications 1867-1914, 11 Part II: "Tech­ nical Pioneering, 1901-1902, 11 Unknown Journal, XI, (1964), 6 p. Mertie, J.B. Geologic Reconnaissance of the Dennison Fork District, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 827, 1931. BOR/ATF

Mitchell, Capt. William. "Building the Alaskan Telegraph System," National Geographic, XV, (Sept., 1904).

Mitchell, William. ''Mitchell in Alaska," American Heritage, (1930), 15 pp.

The Opening of Alaska. (Papers). Manuscript, Microfilm No. 20. National Archives.

Murray, Alexander Hunter. Journal of the Yukon. Canadian Archives Pub. No. 4, Ottawa, 1910.

Naske, Dr. Clause, M. The Fortymile Country -A Historical Study of the Fortymile Mining District. Univ. of Alaska, July 20, 1973 - for BLM.

National Park Service. Proposed Yukon-Charley National Rivers. DES 73-92, Dec. 18, 1973.

Ogilive, William. Early Days on the Yukon. Ottawa, 1913.

Orth, Donald J. Dictionary of Alaskan Place Names. U.S.G.S. Prof. Paper 567, GPO, 1967.

Prindle, L.M. The Fortymile guadrangle, Yukon-Tanana Region, Alaska. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 375.

Quirk III, William A. Historical Aspects of the Building of the Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System with Special Emphasis on the Eagle-Valdez and Goodpaster Telegraph Lines. Unpublished draft. Nov. 1972.

Ricks, Melvin B. Directory of Alaska Post Offices and Postmasters, 1867-1963. Tongass Pub. Co., 1965.

Royal North West Mounted Police. Reports, Forty Mile, Yukon Territory, Daily Log 1909-1912. Dawson Museum, Dawson, Yukon Territory, Canada.

Taylor, Innes A. The Early History of Forty Hile and the Yukon. Mimeograph (Dawson Museum, Dawson, Yukon Territory, Canada).

U.S. Army in Alaska. Pamphlet 360-5, July 1902.

Chapter X: uwashington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph 11 System, 1900-1904 •

Chapter XI: "WAMCATS to ACS, 1905-1940." BOR/ATF

USARAL Historian. The Story of the Alaska Communications System. Unpublished Report, probably written in the 1940's.

U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey. "General Chart of Alaska, 11 Wash­ ington D.C., 1906. 1:3,600,000.

U.S. Geological Survey. Geographic Dictionary of Alaska. Bulletin No. 299, GPO, 1906.

U.S. Signal Corps. A Map. "Telegraph and Cable System in Alaska and U.S. Cables and Canadian line connection with the U.S." Oct. 1904.

A Map. "Signal Corps Telegraph System in Alaska and Canadian line connecting with the U.S." 1903.

Wharton, David B. The Alasl~ Gold Rush. Indiana University Press, 1972.

Wickersham, James A. A bibliography of Alaskan Literature, 1724- 1924, Misc. Pub. of the Alaska Agr. College, Fairbanks, Alaska. A sketch showing completion dates of the Washington-Alaska Military Cable and Telegraph System

• ex: ex: 0 • ex: V') z Nome 1900 • ex: Port Safety Tanana ~,u (Ft. Gibbon) ' \ Eagl 1 \1901 . ( Ft k Egbert) (discontinued 1911) a1rban s Dawson

St. Michael 899 (discontinued 1944) I I {discontinued 1926) V');;2~'"'- 0 hitehorse ex: ~ ~ --1 ~ ~ " 1900 Sewvd Valde/'~~::ordov: >--- s~;~;,~>~ ' I ' / ...... -...... ' ..... _ _ Haines •/ '1902 1905 - ~ o Vancouver ...... Juneaur Land Lines 1904 - ...... /' ...... 190 5 Sub rna ri ne Cab 1e ' ...... Sitka.' 1903 '.Wrangell Wireless Telegraph ' \ -- ' \1906 International Boundary \ 1904' ''\ ~etchi kan

' ~ To Seattle i. aj~ ALAS~ ~~ ~ GOLD RUSH TRAILS ~~t STUDY

It ' Eogl•l I I I I I VALDEZ-EAGLE lditorod • S TELEGRAPH TRAIL I Fort Seltirk • LINE

It I VAlDEZ- EAGLE TRAIL LEGEND .....J!2!._ Valdez - Eagle

1 - ~- Goodpasture ll Ft. Egbert <> Line Cabin + Main T. T. Station ·Standing Poles or Tripods

0=-=- VAlDEZ- EAGlE TRAil LEGEND ...!2!.- Valdez·- Eag1e -1 ~5 - Goodpasture f::. Ft. Egbert <:> line Cab1n + Ma1n T. T. Stat1on Stand1ng Po1es or Tripods VALDEZ- EAGLE TRAIL LEGEND 1002 Valdez - Eagle -'""" Goodpasture ~ Ft. Egbert <> Line Cabin Main T. T. Station • Standing Poles or Tripods VALDEZ- EAGLE TRAIL LEGEND ~ Valdez - Eagle 1 - ~- Goodpasture fj. · Ft. Egbert <> Line Cabin I + Main T. T. Station I Standing Poles or Tripods I i I I I I I I I MAP5 VALDEZ- EAGLE TRAIL LEGEND ~ Valdez - Eagle -'~'- Goodpasture 1::::. Ft. Egbert 0 Line Cabin + Main T. T. Station Standing Poles or Tripods

ofi=-==--=::::>~--=1l----..,,~

MAP6 VALDEZ- EAGLE TRAIL LEGEND -!!2!.._ Valdez .. Eagle _1:2.-s _ Goodpasture 6 Ft. Egbert <> Line Cabin + ~.ain T, T. Station standing Poles or Tripods

\0 ,~-····-

II. SEWARD - NOME ROUTE

1 e •J

A. BACKGROUND

Although popularly known as the "Iditarod Trail", only a portion of the Seward to Nome route was constructed and used to reach the Iditarod gold fields. The route is composed of trails resulting fr0m several gold strikes occurring in differ­ ent areas at different times.

This route can be best discussed in three segments: Seward to Knik and Susitna; Susitna to Kaltag; and Kaltag to Nome.

SEWARD-SUSITNA

Gold was first reported on the Kenai Peninsula by Russian fur traders as early as 1834. However, it was not until 1888 when King found placer gold in the Hope area that serious interest in prospecting and mining in the region developed. Between 1888 and 1896, many claims were staked in the Hope-Sunrise area and across Turnagain Arm in the area of what is now Girdwood. News of strikes in the Sunrise district stimulated a rush in 1896 which brought 2,000-2,500 people into upper Cook Inlet area.

Many of these people came by steamer to the Native village of Tyonek on the west shore of Cook Inlet. Here they transferred to shallower-draft boats to reach the settlements in the upper Inlet·. Hundreds of persons also sailed to Portage Canal in Prince William Sound; disembarked near the present town of Whittier; and walked across the divide and Portage Glacier to the head of Turnagain Arm and to Hope and Sunrise. In 1794, the English explorer, Vancouver, reported the land portion of this route being used by Russian fur traders who in turn were following a route used by Natives for hundreds of years.

A second rush to the area took place in 1898, probably more as a result of the Klondike Stampede and its overflow than from recent strikes in the Sunrise area. The summer of 1898 brought an estimated 7,000-10,000 persons into Cook Inlet.

Sunrise and Hope were destinations for most; however, the old fur trading center of Susitna and the emerging trade center of Knik attracted many. Most came directly to the area by water, but many again used the glacier trail from Portage Canal. Crevasses restricted safe travel by this route to winter and spring months and an alternate route up Billings Creek and down the Twentymile River drainage was occasionally used in summer. In 1898, Mendenhall explored a route from the head of Resurrection Bay near the present town of Seward to the Hope-Sun­ rise area and then around Turnagain Arm, over Crow Creek Passt and across Knik Arm to Knik. At this time travel from Resurrec­ tion Bay to the Hope-Sunrise area and over Crow Creek Pass had been undertaken occasionally by prospectors but no trails as such existed.

Cook Inlet was not navigable during the winter months. Susitna, Knik, Sunrise, and Hope were dependent on winter mail and supplies coming from the ice-free landing sites in Portage Canal and Resurrection Bay. With the growing population in the upper Inlet and with the desire to maintain communications and supply lines, a system of trails soon developed.

Crude winter trails for pack horses and dog teams were developed through use· between Resurrection Bay and the Sunrise area and between Sunrise and Knik and Susitna by 1900. In 1902, the first regularly scheduled mail contract was let between Re­ surrection Bay and Sunrise and Hope.

After the strikes in 1902 and 1906 in the Yentna River and Willow Creek districts, winter trails from Seward to Susitna were well established providing transportation for mail, supplies and travelers. '

Between 1904 and 1906, approximately 50 miles of the Alask,a Central Railroad were constructed from Seward towards Turnagain Arm. By 1911, the railroad, then under the name of the Alaska Northern Railroad, had been completed around the east­ ern end of Turnagain Arm to Mile 71 at Kern Creek.

SUSITNA-KALTAG

Travel into the upper Kuskokwim and Innoko River country before 1905, was limited to a few Russian explorers in the 1830's and 1840's, to several USGS and military exploration parties at the turn of the century, and to occasional prospectors.

In the summer of 1906, a prospecting party led by Thomas Ganes crossed from the Kuskokwim River into the upper Innoko drain­ age and struck gold on Ganes Creek. That winter, news of the strike caused a stampede by miners mostly from along the Yukon River. These early rushers crossed overland from Kaltag and from the trading post of Lewis Landing on the Yukon. When navigation opened that summer, 800-900 people came down the Yukon from Fair­ banks and up the Innoko to the Indian settlement of Dish~~ket, ) t''

Several hundred persons also sailed from Nome up the Yukon and Innoko. From Pishkaket people lined or poled up river to Ganes Creek.

During the winter of 1907-08, men and supplies were transported overland from Kaltag and Lewis Landing by dog team to the town of Moore City on Ganes Creek. A strike on nearby Ophir Creek in early 1908, left Moore City deserted and the new town of Ophir sprang up.

In February 1908, W. L. Goodwin of the Alaska Road Com­ mission left Seward to survey a new trail from Seward to Nome. This trail was to provide more direct winter transportation to Nome and at the same time provide overland access to the new strikes in the Innoko district. Goodwin completed his survey that winter utilizing existing routes from the end of Alaska Central Railroad at about Mile 54, around Turnagain Arm, over Crow Creek Pass, and around Knik Arm, to Knik and Susitna, and also from Kaltag over the divide to Unalakleet and around Norton Sound to Nome. Persons were reported traveling from Susitna to Ophir during the late winter of 1908 and the winter of 1908-09, utilizing river ice corridors adjacent Goodwin's survey route.

W. A. Dikeman and John Beaton, descended the Innoko in late summer of 1908 and went up one of its major tributaries, the Haiditarod, or as it later became known, the Iditarod. On Christmas Day 1908, it is reported that they struck gold on Otter Creek. News of the Iditarod strike was slow to spread, and the summer of 1909 brought only several hundred persons into the area, mainly from the Innoko district and from along the Yukon River. Little mining was done that summer because of poor transportation and a lack of equipment and supplies, but considerable claim staking took place.

During the winter of 1909-10, optimistic reports of rich strikes were widespread. Approximately 2,000 people steamed up and down the Yukon and up the Innoko and Iditarod Rivers when navigation opened in the summer of 1910. In all, an estimated 2,500 people stampeded to the Iditarod developing the new towns of Dikeman at the low water head of steamer navigation; Iditarod, at the extreme head of navigation; and the mining towns of Flat, Ottert Bowlder, and Discovery.

The Iditarod strike and production of gold in 1910 prompted the Alaska Road Commission to begin work on the Seward to Nome trail which had been surveyed by Goodwin in 1908. During the winter of 1910-11, nearly 1,000 miles of trail were marked and cleared from Nome to the Alaska Northern railhead which was at Kern Creek, 71 miles north of Seward. Although most of the new trail work was done between McGrath and Susitna, considerable work was also done marking and repairing the existing routes bet­ ween Kern Creek and Susitna; between Kaltag and Nome; between Kaltag and the Ophir area; and the branch routes to Iditarod and Flat.

This route was authorized by the Alaska Road Commission as the Rainy Pass-Kaltag Trail,.but because the Iditarod mining district was the most common destination it became known as the "Iditarod Trail". From 1911 to 1925, hundreds of people walked and mushed over the trail between Iditarod and Knik or Seward. The trail from Kaltag to Iditarod and to Ophir was used to take people and supplies in from the Yukon.

As new gold districts developed in the upper Kuskokwim area and ·in the Long-Poorman-Cripple area, various branch and connecting trails developed around the "Iditarod Trail". Several segments were upgraded to wagon roads, notably the portage route between Takotna in the Kuskokwim drainage and Ophir on the Innoko, and between Iditarod and Flat,

KALTAG-'NOHE

The first reports of gold on the Seward Peninsula in 1888 received little attention by the outside world. However, in the late fall of 1898, news of the strike at Anvil Creek drew hundreds of gold seekers down the Yukon from the Klondike. Steam­ ers from Seattle and other parts of Alaska started out for the Bering Sea and the Nome area. Freeze-up caught most of the boats coming down the Yukon, and most of the ocean-going vessels got no further than the tip of the Alaskan Peninsula.

Although most waited out the winter, several hundred persons continued down the Yukon River by dog team and on foot. They left the River at the Indian village of Kaltag, crossing the historic Native portage route into the Unalakleet River drain­ age. From the Eskimo village of Unalakleet on Norton Sound, they traveled around the Sound to Nome.

In the next two years thousands of people rushed to Nome, first to the placer deposits in the several creeks in the area and then in 1900 to the gold-bearing sands of the Nome beach. Nome was easily reached by steamer with no overland travel required.

As JlOme grew quickly into Alaska 1 s richest mining re­ gion, its poPtlation swelled to 12,488 in 1900. Communication ..

with other areas was badly needed during the many months when navigation was not possible. In 1900 and 1901, a telegraph line was constructed from Nome to Fort Gibbon at the Tanana-Yukon con­ fluence. Between Nome and St. Michaels the first sea cable in Alaska was installed. From St. Michaels the line went north to Unalakleet then over the portage route to Kaltag and up the Yukon River. The sea cable was replaced by the first long-distance wireless telegraph in the United States by 1903.

Winter mail was also carried along the Yukon betwe~n Nome and Dawson at the turn of the century. The Fairbanks gold · strike in 1902, and the subsequent rush to the Alaskan interior stimulated development of the mail route from Valdez to Fair­ banks. By the winter of 1905-06, the trail from Valdez brought mail to Fairbanks which in turn was carried down the Yukon by dog team to Kaltag, over to Unalakleet, and around Norton Sound to Nome. B. LOCATION AND REGIONAL ENVIRONMENT

GENERAL ALIG~mENT

The accompanying map outlines the major segments of the Seward-Nome route.

The Seward to Nome trail surveyed by Goodwin in 1908, ran from Mile 54 of the Alaska Railroad around Turnagain Arm, over Crow Creek Pass, around Knik Arm to Knik, to Susitna, to the Skwentna River, up the Skwentna to Happy River, then up the Happy River to Pass Creek, over Rainy Pass, down Dalzell Creek to the Rohn River, across the South Fork of Kuskokwim to Big River, to McGrath, to Takotnat to Ophir, to Dishkaket, to Kaltag, to Unalakleet, up Norton Sound to Ungalik River, across the Sound to Isaacs Roadhouse on Bald Head, and along the shoreline to Nome.

During construction of the trail in the winter of 1910~ 1911, some route changes were made and additional trails marked. Most notable of these additions were the trail from Dishkaket to Dikeman and on to Iditarod and Flat and the trail from Iditarod up Bonanza Creek, down Fourth of July Creek to Takotna. In ad­ dition to these routes, a third trail connecting the surveyed route with the Iditarod district existed in 1910. This trail provided a direct route between Ophir and Iditarod crossing the Dishna River near Windy Creek and intersecting the Dikeman-Iditarod Trail near Moore Creek.

Although the surveyed route crossed Crow Creek Pass from Girdwood, a new trail was constructed from Girdwood down Turnagain Arm and over Indian Pass in the fall of 1908. As this route avoided the avalanche problems and extreme steepness of Crow Creek Pass, it was used and improved during construction of the "Kaltag-Rainy Pass Trail" in the winter of 1910-11. How­ ever, Goodwin rebuilt the trail through Crow Creek Pass avoiding some of the snowslide areas in the summer of 1911, favoring this route because it was 15-20 miles shorter and had only about a mile of "bad going11 as opposed to five miles reported for the Indian Pass route. Both the Indian and the Crow'creek routes were used until the railroad '9Jas completed around the mountains via Anchorage in 1~18.

Other branch trails include the glacier route between Whittier and Portage and the route from Portage Canal down the Twentymile drainage to the railroad. Two main trails were used to reach Hope and Sunrise, one crossing Moose Pass from the rail­ road and up Quartz Creek, the other leaving the railroad grade at Trail Creek, up Johnson Creek and dotvn the Sixmile Creek drainage. ' i

I

T .e

A trail from Nulato which intersected the Kaltag-Dishkaket trail was used as a short-cut to carry mail and supplies to the Iditarod from Fairbanks. The old route from Lewis Landing to Ophir followed the Nortn Fork down to the Innoko then up this river through Cripple to Ophir. When Cripple developed as a mining center a winter route was established to connect it with the Ruby-Long-Poor­ man district to the east.

In the early twenties, summer trails were constructed linking Ophir with Poorman and Ruby and linking Flat with Takotna. When the Alaska Railroad was completed to Nancy a new winter trail was built from there to Susitna.

In March o.f 1973, and again in 1974, a race was held from Anchorage to Nome. Because this race is billed as the "Iditarod Trail" race, the race route is also shown on the ,accompanying map. This route varies substantially from the old "Rainy Pass-Kaltag Trail" in the vicinity of the Alaska Range and between Ophir and Kaltag. The race route has gone th'rough Ptarmigan Pass rather than Rainy Pass reportedly to avoid ava­ lanche danger. In order to pass through Native villages along the Yukon, the race route follows the newer su~er trail out of Ophir through Bear Creek and Folger to Poorman, over the road to Ruby, and down the Yukon through Galena, Koyukuk and Nulato to Kaltag.

In many areas, the route crosses sea and lake ice, rivers, and open tundra areas. Here, no trail as such was built, but rather tripods or stakes used to mark a route~ Most of these have to be replaced every year and trail alignments could vary by as much as a mile.or more from year to year.

LENGTH

Table I gives the approximate mileage of the various trail segments.

The originally surveyed "Rainy-Pass-Kaltag Trail" which bypassed the Iditarod-Flat area was roughly 850 miles in length from Seward to Nome. From Seward to Iditarod following the most common route was approximately 540 miles; from Knik, roughly 390 miles. The three "turnoffs" from the survey route to Iditarod were each roughly 90 miles in length. The dog sled race route is reported to be 1,049 miles long from Anchorage to Nome. ·e BOR/ATF

12 TABL·E I

Approximate distances between various points along the

SEWARD TO NOME ROUTE

Major Segments of Surveyed Route Mileage

Seward - Kern Creek 71 Kern Creek - Knik (via Indian Pass) 86 (via Crow Creek Pass) 70 Knik - Susitna 34 Susitna - Skwentna 38 Skwentna- Rainy Pass 89 Rainy Pass - Farewell 3.3 Farewell - McGrath 80 McGrath - Takotna 17 Takotna - Ophir 24 Ophir - Dishkaket 55 Dishkaket - Kaltag 66 Kaltag - Unalakleet 96 Unalakleet - Solomon 152 Solomon - Nome 32 Total 943 Major Branch Segments

Takotna - Flat 87 Flat - Iditarod 8 Dishkaket - Iditarod 98 Ophir - Iditarod 90 Takotna - Flat (summer) 93 Nulato - Dishkaket 90 Lewis Landing - Cripple 60 Cripple - Ophir 47 Poorman - Cripple 47 Ophir - Poorman (summer) 125 Poorman - Ruby 57 Ruby - Kaltag 140 Seward - Sunrise 66 Sunrise- Hope ~- 8 Moose Pass - Granite Creek Gaur~ Station (via Bench Lake- Johnson Lake) / 22 ~~ittier - Portage Lake · 10 Portage Lake - Portage 7 rfuittier - Portage (via Twentymile) 25 Rainy Pass Lodge - Rohn River (via Ptarmigan Pass) 75 Nancy - Susitna 22 REGIONAL CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY, VEGETATION

The National Weather Service describes the climatic zone covering much of the Seward to Nome route as "Transitional". This zone is characterized by 12-30 inches of precipitation annually (average 17) and mean annual temperatures from 22 to 35°F. (90°F max.-70°F min.). Around the McGrath area a more continental climate is encountered with somewhat colder winter temperatures warmer summer temperatures, and less precipitation than those "transitional" regions receiving more maritime influences. In the Seward area a maritime climatic zone exists. Here precipi­ tation is considerably greater (80"), and winter temperatures not so extreme.

Over much of the route winters are long, dark, and severe, beginning with freeze-up in October of lakes and streams and ending with break-up usually in May. Snowfall averages 50- 100 inches a year with accumulations averaging 2-5 feet depending on elevation and wind conditions. Winds along Norton Sound and in the mountainous regions are conunon and can bring chill factors in the winter down to -100°F and colder. Extended periods of -40°F to -60°F are common in the interior. On the shortest day of the year only about 4-6 hours daylight occur.

Summers are short but warm over most of the route with temperatures often in the 70's and 80's in the interior. On the longest day sunlight averages from 20-22 hours with twilight during the remaining 24 hours. Precipitation averages 4-6 inches in' the summer months. Although freezing temperatures have been reported in all months except July in most areas, a frost-free season gen­ erally extends from the first of June to the end of August.

Permafrost underlays much of the route, especially north of the Kuskokwim River. The region from Seward to Susitna is free of permafrost and portions of the Innoko valley and Kuskokwim valley are underlain with isolated masses. The permafrost through­ out the Alaska Range is discontinuous.

Topography varies from the tidewater lagoons, spits, and barrier beaches of the Seward Peninsula to the high rugged peaks of the Alaska Range and Chugach Mountains. From Seward to Knik Arm the route traverses narrow valleys through the Kenai and Chugach Mountains. Relief is great with 3,000-5,000 foot peaks rising two to three thousand feet above the valley floors. Crow Creek Pass is approximately 3,500 feet in elevation while Indian Pass is 2,300 feet.

From Knik to the south slope of the Alaska Range gently rolling~owlands of the Susitna River valley are traversed. Rainy Pass provides a comparatively short gentle route through the rug­ ged Alaska Range reaching an elevation of approximately 3,350 feet. Peaks in the area exceed 5,000 feet. From Farewell Lake on the north side of the Range to Takotna the route crosses the extensive Kuskokwim river valley. Relief is low and elevations range from 1,000 to 3,500 feet.

The low mountains, hills and ridges of the Kuskokwim Mountains extend northeast to southwest across the Ophir and Iditarod region in the upper Innoko River drainages. Relief is moderate with most ridges and peaks between 2,000 and 3,000 feet disected by broad valleys 200-1,000 feet in elevation. Similar relief is encountered crossing the Kaiyuh Mountains which are separated from the Kuskokwim Mountains by the low "flats" of the Innoko River.

After crossing the Yukon River at Kaltag, the route follows the broad Unalakleet River valley through the adjacent Kaltag Mountains averaging 2,000-3,000 feet in elevation. After reaching Unalakleet the trail generally stays at or near sea level as it skirts the barren coast~ine of Norton Sound to Nome.

The different climatic zones, permafrost conditions, topography, and soils encountered along the route combine to provide a wide variety of vegetative ecosystems. Alpine tundra is found in the passes in the Chugach Mountains, the Alaska Range, and the Kuskokwim Mountains between Ophir and Iditarod. Wet tundra is found in areas around Norton Sound. Over much of the Seward to knik Arm area a coastal western hemlock-Sitka spruce forest system exists up to an elevation of 2,000-3,000 feet. From Knik to the Alaska Range lowland spruce-hardwood forests and bottomland spruce- poplar forests are encountered. \

On either side of Rainy Pass an upland spruce-hardwood ·_,) forest is preserit\up to an elevation of approximately 2,500 feet. The Kuskokwim vaney is largely covered with lowland spruce-hard­ wood forest\~~ i'$:,.the Innoko River valley. The valleys through the ,Kuskokwim MounJ;ains, the Kaiyuh Mountains, and Kaltag Moun­ tains are gerieraliy\tovered with upland spruce-hardwood forest. A majo.~·:~tea hig~ bru'·sh ·system is located in the Nome area.

:.--. Throughout the forested areas many open areas of muskeg, marshEfs, shallow lakes, and grass tussocks are found. Dense wil­ ' low and alder thickets are common along rivers and streams.

Large game animals are common throughout the region, although most populations are sparse in relation to land area because of the harsh climatic conditions and absence of available winter food. Caribou, moose, Dall sheep, black bear, brown/ grizzly bear, wolves are locally present in varying concentrations. Important waterfowl nesting areas are located in the Innoko and Kuskokwim valleys and along the shores of Norton Sound. Small fur­ bearers including lynx, beaver, mink, land otter, weasel, martin, and muskrat are abundant over much of the interior. Common rap­ tors in the area include northern bald eagles, golden eagles, osprey and a variety of hawks and owls. In addition, the endan­ gered American peregrine falcon is believed to be present in the area.

During some periods of the year, mosquitoes and biting flies are so numerous in places that unprotected persons risk serious.injury. Even repellants and headnets cannot always pro­ tect against the mental anguish which can result from the massive drone of wings and endless attack.

LAND USES ~~ ACCESS

With the exception of a few small towns and Native villages, the route between Knik and Nome is largely uninhabited. Little land has been cleared and a primitive environment exists over much of the distance. t.Jith the exception of some mining in the Flat-Ophir area, most use of the land consists of subsistence­ related activities. Hunting, fishing, trapping, berry picking, and log cutting is taking place around villages and towns. These activities generally occur within a radius of 30 miles of the settlement.

Nearly 200,000 persons live between Seward and Knik. This area surrounding Anchorage is the largest population con­ centration in Alaska. Urban development is occurring rapidly and much of the land is being used for residential, farming, re­ creational, commercial and industrial purposes.

Between Seward, Anchorage and Knik a major highway sys­ tem exists. The Alaska Railroad also connects Seward and Whittier with Anchorage, Palmer and Wasilla. Numerous airfields exist in the region including Anchorage International Airport. Passenger car access is limited to either end of the historic trail segments across Crow Creek Pass and Indian Pass.

Beyond Knik no portion of the historic route is road accessible from the major highway net. However, short unconnected roads exist between Sterling Landing just south of McGrath through Takotna to Ophir, between Iditarod and Flat and Discovery, between Poorman and Ruby, and between Solomon and Nome. Numerous airstrips are found at the various settlements in the area, and McGrath, Galena, Unalakleet and Nome are served by regular commercial jet service. The villages along the Yukon, including Ruby and Kaltag, and the villages around Norton Sound are served at least once a week by smaller commercial aircraft.

GENERAL LA~~ OWNERSHIP

Most of the land along the route is currently in public ownership. The State currently owns most of the trail area from Girdwood to the Alaska Range while the remainder is in federal ownership. With the exception of the section from Seward to Girdwood which is in Chugach National Forest, the federally owned segments are managed by the Bureau of Land Management.

I The Alaska Statehood Act and the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 197i set in motion substantial changes in future land ownership and management in Alaska. Approximately 40 million acres are to be selected for ownership by Native corporations and 103 million acres by the State of Alaska. An additional 83 mil­ lion acres of public domain lands have been recommended for addi­ tion to the National Park, National Wildlife Refuge, National Forest, and Wild and Scenic Rivers Systems.

Most of the land around Norton Sound from Unalakleet and Nome has been withdrawn for Native selection. Similarly, most of the land along the Yukon River from Ruby to Kaltag has been withdrawn for Native selection. The villages of Takotna and McGrath will also be selecting lands along the route in the Kuskokwim River valley. The village of Eklutna is currently selecting several townships through which the route went.

The State of Alaska has made land selections covering most of the route through the Kuskokwim Mountains. In addition to state lands already patented in the Susitna River valley, the routes over Crow Creek Pass and Indian Pass are included in Chugach State Park.

Of the 83 million acres proposed for additions to the four national conservation systems~ three proposals include lands along the route.. The Innoko lowlands around Dishkaket are in­ cluded in the Koyukuk National Wildlife Refuge proposal and the Kuskokwim River valley between the Alaska Range and McGrath is included in the Yukon-Kuskokwim National Forest proposal. The lands surrounding the upper 60 miles of the Unalakleet River are included in the Unalakleet National Wild River proposal. All Native lands must be selected by December of 1975, all State lands by 1985, and action on proposed additions to the national systems is to be taken by December 1978.

In addition to Native lands which will be privately owned, numerous tracts are in private ownership between Seward and Knik. Some private lands and an undetermined number of mining . claims also exist in the Iditarod-Flat, Ophir, and Takotna areas.

Virtually all of the route was part of the territorial system of roads and trails and was maintained by the Alaska Road Commission using federal and/or territorial monies. The State of Alaska maintains that a right-of-way still exists in the name of the State along all such roads and trails pursuant to revised Statute 2477 authorized by Congress in 1866. C. HISTORIC RESOURCES

PERIOD AND TYPE OF USE

Seward-Susitna

From 1896 to 1917, thousands of persons passed over the route from Seward and Whittier to Hope, Sunrise, Girdwood, Knik, and Susitna. Because Cook Inlet provided good boat transporta­ tion in the ice-free season, most of the trails were used largely as winter trails when packed snow provided a smooth surface over normally rough or wet terrain. Winter travel was most common by dog team although many persons walked or snowshoed the trails. Occasionally, horses, sometimes outfitted wi.th snowshoes, trav­ ersed the route, although limited winter forage prevented wide­ spread use of horses in Alaska. Many of the trails were broken regularly by mail carriers.

A few routes were also used in the summer by pack horses. Harry Revelle had one of the Hrst pack trains which operated bet­ ween Sunrise and Hope around the turn of the century.

As the Alaska Railroad was completed further and fur­ ther north from Seward, trail segments were abandoned. After 1910, the railroad grade was utilized between Seward and Kern Creek. After 1917, the trails over Indian and Crow Creek Passes were seldom used because the railroad was completed from Kern Creek to Wasilla through the new town of Anchorage. \ihen the rails were laid to Wasilla and then north to Nancy and beyond, the bypassed town of Knik also was all but abandoned. In 1920, a new trail was built from Nancy to Susitna which virtually ended travel through Knik. Also by 1920, summer wagon roads and car roads had replaced major segments of the old routes. ,, World War I also hastened the decline of gold mining in the region. Mines in the Hope-Sunrise area and in the Willow Creek area closed down as manpower was drawn off by the war and by railroad construction. Although several mines continued to operate after the war and for years afterward, mining never again reached the prominence experienced in the early 1900's.

,Susitna-Kaltag

The first rush to the Innoko District occurred from the Yukon River in early 1907. Overland winter trails began to be established from Lewis Landing and Kaltag to the Ophir area at that time. These trails were extended to the Iditarod dis­ trict after gold was struck there during the winter of 1908-09. Peak gold production took place in both districts in 1912. At this time hundreds of persons annually were travelling the newly constructed "Iditarod Trail11 between Seward and Knik and the mining districts. Heavy traffic continued over this trail up until around 1920 when mining activity had declined substantially and the Alaska Railroad had been completed north of the Alaska Range.

Although Goodwin's "Rainy Pass-Kaltag11 trail was intend­ ed to cutover 300 miles off the winter mail route to Nome from an ice-free port, mail was never taken between Seward and Nome. The contract was continually won by carriers using the route from Valdez through Fairbanks, down the Yukon River and over the Kaltag­ Nome trail. Between 1910 and 1914, the mail to the Innoko and Iditarod districts also was carried dotrn the Yukon from Fairbanks - even after the completion of the "Iditarod Trail" from Seward. The mail route left the Yukon River at Kaltag-or Nulato and con­ tinued through Dishkaket to Ophir and Iditarod.

In 1914, Harry Revelle won the winter mail contract to Iditarod and took the first mail from Seward over the "Iditarod Trail" to Ophir and then south to Iditarod. This service con­ tinued through the winter of 1918-19. In 1919, however, the Alaska Railroad was completed to Kobe on the north side of the Alaska Range and the mail was again carried along the Yukon to Ruby and then south to Ophir and Iditarod.

During the winter of 1920-21 the contract was returned to the 11 Iditarod Trail" for one final season. Despite cutting a reported three weeks off the delivery time to McGrath, the com­ pletion of the Alaska Railroad to Fairbanks and the opening of a new trail to McGrath between the Tanana and upper KuskokwimJ marked the end of most use and the rapid abandonment of the trail. After 1914, most of the trails from Kaltag, Nulato and Lewis on the Yukon to the Ophir and Fairbanks areas were seldom used and were abandoned by 1923. The rise of air mail service in the late twenties eliminated additional trail segments.

The summer routes between Ruby and Ophir, Ophir and Flat, Sterling La.nding (near McGrath) and Takotna and Ophir con­ tinued to be improved and are still used today. Winter route~ in the McGrath area are also still in use.

Almost all of the early trails along this segment of the route were winter trails used by dog teams, foot travelers, and occasionally by horses. The normal travel season began at the end of October and extended through April. March and early April were the most popular times to travel because of favorable conditions. Most supplies were brought in and gold shipped out by boat. However, in December 1911, Wells Fargo reportedly mushed out nearly 1/2 million dollars in gold over the trail to Seward. Because of rough t~rrain and,frequent bogs, only a few people are known to have crossed the route under snow-free conditions. Horse­ pulled wagons and then motor vehicles hauled supplies and equip­ ment over the road from the river port at Takotna to Ophir and between Iditarod and Flat. A tramway also operated between Idi­ tarod and Flat.

Kaltag-Nome

Although the rush to Nome occurred between 1898 and 1900. peak gold production was not reached until 1905 and 1906. It was at this time that the Kaltag-Nome trail began to be used on a regular basis to carry mail from Fairbanks to Nome. Over­ land mail service continued and the trail was maintained by the Alaska Road Commission until the mid-1920's when aircraft replaced the dog sled for this mail route. Because major sections of this trail utilized the frozen waters·of Norton Sound and adjacent lagoons, this was almost exclusively a winter trail.

This segment was also used by winter travelers to and from various villages around Norton Sound and by local hunters and trappers.

The section between Kaltag and Unalakleet was being used as a portage trail between the Yukon River and Norton Sound for hundreds of years prior to the Gold Rush. Eskimos from Norton Sound and Athabascans from the Yukon valley traded and raided over this route. In 1901, a telegraph line (WAMCATS) was com­ pleted over this section linking Nome and St. Michaels with in­ terior Alaska. The route generally followed the old and new trail alignment and was regularly used for line maintenance by the Army Signal Corps. Soon after 1910, most segments of the trans­ Alaska telegraph system were replaced by wireless connnunication.

HISTORIC TRAIL REMNANTS

Highways, the Alaska Railroad, wagon roads, and tractor trails have been superimposed on many old trail segments. es­ pecially in the Seward to Susitna area and around Ophir and Idi­ tarod. However, traces of the historic route are still visible in the alpine areas of Indian, Crow Creek. and Rainy Passes. ,.

Although very overgrown, sections can also be seen in.the forested areas between Knik and McGrath because of the relatively slow rate of tree growth in this region. It is not known if historic trails can still be seen in the Ophir-Iditarod area or between there and the Yukon River.

From Kaltag to Unalakleet the historic trail and tele­ graph route can be observed. It is assumed that virtually all the telegraph wire and the supporting tripods have been removed or have rotted away. The trail from Unalakleet to Nome generally followed the barren shoreline and ice of Norton Sound. Only a few short segments which cut across peninsulas of forest or tundra are still visible. Most of these are still used today by Native people traveling between villages.

Virtually the entire leugrh of the Seward to Nome route was covered at regular intervals by roadhouses (see attached map). Every 15 to 30 miles (one day's hike or mush) these roadhouses provided food and lodging to mail carriers and other travelers. Even before a new trail was completed choice roadhouse sites were staked along the route. As Goodwin thrashed his way through virgin territory between the Kuskokwim and Rainy Pass in the winter of 1910-11, the only people he reported seeing were two men selecting sites and putting up roadhouses.

South of the Alaska Range only the old roadhouse at Skwentnahas survived fire, vandalism, firewood gathering, stream bartk erosion and decay which claimed the various roadhouses over the years. North of the Alaska Range the only known standing road­ house is at Rohn River. More modern trapping cabins and lodges have been built at several of the old roadhouse locations such as Rainy Pass Lodge and Farewell Lake. Between Kaltag and Unalakleet some remains of the old telegraphic relay stations and line cabins are believed to exist. At other roadhouse locations decaying rem­ nants of log structures have been reported.

Tools, implements, and equipment hauled over the old route undoubtedly were lost or abandoned over the years. Such articles dating back to the late 1890's may still be present along the trails because of the relatively slow rate of oxidation and decomposition due to low precipitation and low mean annual temperatures.

RELATED HISTORIC SITES

Five historic sites located along or near the Seward to Nome route are listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Table II lists these sites, the date they were entered on the Register and their significance.

In addition to these sites, the town site of Iditarod has been nominated to the Register pending approval by Doyon, the Native Regional Corporation. Iditarod is now a ghost town. Only a few buildings now remain where once 600-700 people lived. In its heyday the town had a telephone system, a tramway, two newspapers, four hotels, three lumber companies, a fire hall, nine saloons, a school and churches. ·

The nearby mining town of Flat is now nearly deserted also. From a peak of 400 people,. only a few miners live there today, wast seasonally. However, unlike Iditarod many old structures are still remaining in and around Flat and both qld and newer mining equipment can be seen.

Historic structures and mining implements in and around Ophir also exist, although the extent and condition of these his­ toric resources is not known. No population was reported for Ophir in the 1970 census.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE

None of the various segments of the Nome to Seward route were ever trampled by the rush of thousands of men as experienced. over the Chilkoot Pass and White Pass trails to the Klondike in 1898. Most rushers to the Hope-Sunrise area, the Willow Creek district, the Nome area, the Innoko, and the Iditarod came by steamer. Yet, once in the gold fields, there became a vital need to establish communication and supply lines with the outside world during the long periods when ice and snow sealed off the water arteries. The winter trail system which developed almost from the inception of the original strikes became the lifeline of the mining towns for over six months of the year. Even as late as 1925, the importance of the trails was emphasized when a diphteria epi­ d·et:!.ic broke out in Nome. Serum was rushed by dog team from Nenana in time to save many lives. covered much of the distance over the Kaltag to Nome trail segment.

The so-called "Iditarod Trail" between Seward and the diggings in the Innoko and Iditarod districts was of particular significance. The Iditarod strike was the last big bonanza in the waning gold rush era in Alaska. Total production of placer gold from the Iditarod ranks third, only behind Nome and Fair­ banks, among all the mining districts in Alaska. The Innoko ranks fifth. The combined production of these two districts represent more than 9% of all placer gold produced in Alaska. In its peak BOR./ATF

'l' A B L E II 27A Sites Associated with the SEWARD TO NOME ROUTE Included on the

NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES

Site Date Entered Significance

Hope Historic District 4/25/72 Evidence of gold mining activity on the Kenai Peninsula dating back to 1888.

Old St.Nicholas Russian Russian missionary activity associated Orthodox Church,Eklutna 3/24/72 with fur trading in Cook Inlet dating back to mid-1800's.

Knik 7/23/73 Knik, once the largest community on Cook Inlet, served as regional trading and transportation center from about 1898 to 1917. Includes Knik Museum containing materials dating back to Knik's heyday and "Dog Mashers Hall of Fame" commemorating the long history of dog mushing in Alaska.

Iyatayet Site, Cape 10/15/66 One of earliest such sites found, dating Denbigh peninsula, back to 6000 B.C., it has given definite Norton Sound sequential evidence of coastal occupa­ tion beginning with the Denbigh flint industry. Site has given substance to the assumption that the first people in Americas came south from Alaska.

Anvil Creek, Nome 10/15/66 Alaska's great gold rush began when the first large gold placer strike was made here on September 20, 1898. year, 1912. Iditarod produced approximately 3 million dollars in gold or one-fourth of Alaska's total pla~er production during that y~ar.

Travel up the Yukon, Innoko, and Iditarod Rivers was slow and tedious. Thus, although most of the initial stampeders · and later supplies arrived by boat, many travelers to the Iditarod country after 1910 preferred overland travel. The trail received publicity in various ~~gazines stimulating trail travel into Alaska's interior· by people from ~ny states and other countries. In this sense the route had national as well as state-wide signi­ ficance.

In addition to newly landed persons mushing or walking over the trail after getting off ships in Seward, Whittier or at the mouth of Ship Creek (Anchorage), hundreds of people engaged in ·summer mining operations crossed the route semi-annually. A large·exodus generally followed freeze-up in October when most mining operations terminated and many over-wintered outside Alaska · or in larger Alaskan communities. Prior. to break-up in late April or :Hay, the mining towns swelled with z:eturning men.

The importance of the Seward to Nome route is also underscored by the funds expended for construction and maintenance of the various trail segment's by the Alaska Road Commission. By 1924, over $175,000 of Territorial and Federal funds had been spent on the major trail segments between Kern Creek and Nome, excluding the substantial investment in the roads between Tahotna and Ophir and between Flat and Iditarod. In the early 1900's this repre­ sented a significant portion of the Alaska Road Commission's budget for trails. ------··-··----·

D. PRESENT AND PROSPECTIVE TRAIL USES AND ENVIRONMENT

Only a few miles of the hundreds pf miles of the his­ toric route are currently maintained as trails. The U.S. Forest Service maintains a four mile summer hiking trail which generally follows the old trail alignment up to Crow Creek Pass from the Girdwood area. Another trail following the branch route up John­ son Creek and down Bench Creek to the Hope-Sunrise area from the railroad is also maintained by the Forest Service. A crude winter trail exists over Indian Pass and may be receiving some maintenance by the State Division of Parks.

The summer trails developed in the early 1920's bet­ ween Ophir and Flat and between Poorman and Ophir are still being utilized by vehicles and may be receiving maintenance by the State of Alaska.

Other segments, although not being publicly maintained, continue to be passable winter trails through use. These include segments in the M~Grath-Takotna area, between villages along Norton Sound, between Kaltag and Unalakleet and between Knik and Susitna. Because of changing snow and ice conditions, windfalls, and brush growth, these trails can vary in location by as much as a mile or two from year to year and even from storm to storm. Unless well traveled, breaking trail 'along these routes by foot. do~ team or snow machine can be a grueling ordeal.

The segment over Rainy Pass through the Alaska Range is still visible in places, although badly overgrown by brush and altered by snow and rock slides in places. This segment is believed to be passable, although difficult, in both summer and winter. The route from Crow Creek Pass to Eagle River is similarly overgrown and altered by snow slides and stream channel changes. However, the general route is still passable in summer and winter with some difficulty.

Most of the remaining segments are either not readily locatable or are too altered or overgrown to permit travel. Ex­ cept for those segments over mountain passest virtually all re­ maining portions of the route are ill suited for summer travel. As the historic trails made ample use of frozen lakes, rivers, muskegs and marshes, summer trail conditions are extremely poor if not non-existent. Additionally, the winter snow conceals an extremely rough ground surface in most places due to stumps, fallen trees, low brush, frost heaved hummocks and tussocks, and other obstacles. · Several segments of the old trail route are easily tra­ versed and continue to be maintained - as roads and railroads. Gravel roads now connect Nome and Solomon, Flat and Iditarod, Ophir and Takotna and Sterling, Landing~ and Poorman and Ruby. A paved highway overlays several old segments between Seward and Knik with extensions to Sunrise and Hope and up the Eagle River valley and Crow Creek valley several miles. The Alaska Railroad is still used along the route alignment between Seward and Kern Creek and under the Portage Glacier pass from Whittier.

SCENIC, RECREATIONAL QUALITIES

The route on the Kenai Peninsula and in the Anchorage area is highly scenic and easily accessible in both summer and winter. The route often parallels swift streams through deep mountain valleys. In a matter of hours a range of eco-systems and even seasons can be experienced as one proceeds from the dense spruce forests of river valleys, to the small poplar groves on the hillsides, to the alpine tundra above, and-finally to the rock rubble, snow fields and glaciers on mountain peaks. The proximity of the Anchorage urban area and the easy access by road and railroad give this segment of the route high recreational value for day use and weekend use. The presence of some developed trails and recreational facilities along this segment further increases its recreational attractiveness.

Beyond Knik much different recreational qualities are encountered. Access from the state highway net is not available and most of the land is uninhabited. Over much of the distance a wilderness environment exists. The recreational values asso­ ciated with wilderness are quite rare nationally, although more common in Alaska.

Offsetting these special wilderness recreational qual- . !ties are, of course,' the inherent problems of access to and travel through large stretches of primitive country. Access is only available by commercial and/or charter aircraft. Summer overland travel along most of this route is nearly impossible. Thickets, windfalls, tussocks, muskegs. lakes, mosquitoes and other obstacles continually impede travel especially across the vast low valleys of the Susitna, Kuskokwim, and Innoko valleys. The route through Rainy Pass is an exception to these general conditions because of the continuous high and predominant alpine vegetation.

Winter offers far superior travel conditions although the severe cold, deep snotl1 and long· distances severely limit re­ creational use to only the very hardy. An added benefit of the long winter is the absence of the mosquitoe. The presence of this insect cannot be underrated in describing the adversities of summer travel, especially in lowland areas.

The environment traversed by this segment offers a primitive beauty. · Plant and animal communities are for the most part in their natural state and nature study and photographic opportunities abound. The presence or absence of streams, bogs, permafrost, slopes, and other features creates a continuous mosaic of vegetation patterns. ~bile vegetation provides a degree of scenic diversity, the topography over large segments of the route is fairly uniform. The extensive rolling to flat lowlands provide few "scenic vistas" and long distance travel can become monotonous.

Again, exceptions to this uniformity would be the moun­ tainous areas traversed. The section through the Alaska Range over Rainy Pass possesses outstanding scenic values. The sec­ tions through the Kuskokwim and Kaltag Mountains may also have _ exceptional scenic qualities. The Unalakleet River has been proposed as a national wild river area'and would include much of the trail route between Kaltag and Unalakleet. High scenic and recreational qualities identified for this river area would also be associated with this trail section.

The character of.the shoreline of Norton Sound probably varies between winter and summer more than any other route seg­ ment. In winter when continuous trail travel may be possible, a treeless landscape/seascape swept by blowing snow paints a bleak recreation picture to say the least. The summer transforms this scene almost magically. As the Bering sea ice recedes, sea mammals can occasionally be seen offshore, sa~on make their way up streams by the thousands, the tundra comes alive with flowers and berries, and blues and greens replace white as dominant colors. At the same time, the melting of snow and ice means the destruction of the trail. Where lagoons and sea ice were used to bridge barrier dunes and spits, only open water remains.

RECREATIONAL USES

Host current recreational use of the route occurs in the Seward-Susitna region. Between Seward and Girdwood and bet­ ween Egale River and Knik much of this use is in the form of driving for pleasure, picnicking~ and sightseeing. A highway and railroad cover much of these segments. The Forest Service re­ creational trails up to Crow Creek Pass and across the Bench Lake­ Johnson-Lake Pass receive heavy summer use by hikers. Two public use cabins on these trails are reserved much of the summer. · The 22-mile Bench Lake trail also receives winter use by snow machiners and cross-country skiers.

The section from Crow Creek Pass down to Eagle River (approximately 25 miles) also receives considerable summer hiking use. The Eagle River valley is also used heavily in the winter by cross-country skiers and snow machiners. Similarly, the 20- mile Indian Pass section between Anchorage and Indian is utilized as a summer hiking route and is a very popular winter cross-country ski trip.

Between Knik and Susitna the many trails and seismic lines receive substantial winter use by dog mushers, snowmobilers, and cross-country skiers. Most of this use takes place w,ithin 10-12 miles of Knik. Some summer hiking use of the old "Iditarod Trail" occurs up to four miles from Knik.

Hiking fishing, hunting and berry picking are popular summer and fall activities all along the road system in this area. Such activity is occurring along the route although it may not be associated with a specific trail or route segment. Simi­ larly, cross-country skiing and snow machine use occur over much of the route in the winter where the highway or railroad provide access to adjacent day-use areas.

Beyond the Susitna.River recreation use is primarily non-trail oriented. Fly-in fishing and hunting are the principal activities. This use is not very extensive or intensive at the present time. Some hiking and "wilderness" guiding is taking place across Rainy Pass although the level of this·use is believed to be low. Some recreational hunting, fishingt and travel around the several towns and villages along the route is probably taking place, although most such activity is geared to a subsistence life style. Present winter recreational use is even lighter. Some recreational snow machine use and cross-country skiing probably occurs in the Nome area~ the McGrath area, and beyond the Susitna.

An exception to this light activity is the Anchorage to Nome sled dog race. For the past two years approximately 40 mushers and 400 dogs have traversed major portions of the "Iditarod Trail". Although only roughly half the field make it to Nome each year, most make it to McGrath.

The dog sled race follows the route closely except bet­ ween Ophir and Kaltag and through t·he Alaska Range. Instead of cutting directly across the Innoko valley to Kaltag, the race route follows the summer trail north from Ophir to Poorman and then the road to Ruby. Between Ruby and Kaltag the Yukon River is utilized. This route was selected because it passed through several Native villages where dog mushing used to be extremely popular and im­ portant before the days of the snow machine. With the new in­ terest in dog racing developing in Alaska and the excitement gener­ ated by the ''Iditarod Trail" Race, dogs have agaiu returned to the Yukon villages. The 1974 race was won by Carl Huntington, a Native resident of Galena.

The route through Ptarmigan Pass was selected to avoid the avalanche dangers through Rainy Pass. However. this year's experience with winds in Ptarmigan Pass sending chill factors down to -130° has prompted the race committee to seriously con­ sider using the historic Rainy Pass route in next year's race.

Recreation use along the route is expected to increase. dramaticallyt especially in the Seward to Knik region. Hiking, cross-country skiing, and off-road vehicle use will continue to rise as the population in Southcentral Alaska expands. Unless carefully managed this use can be expected to have an adverse effect on the environment as plants, animals, soils, and other recreationists feel the wear and tear of heavy use.

Recreation use, both summer and winter, is expected to increase beyond Knik and Susitna also as people travel fur- ther to seek a quality hunting, fishing, hiking, and other re­ creation areas. The largest increase can be expected in the areas closest to Anchorage. The Rainy Pass segment will probably receive much greater summer and winter travel in future years.

The possible creation of a new National Forest, National Wildlife Refuge, and National Hild River would also attract more people to various segments of the route. The recreation develop­ ment plan for Chugach State Park calls for the construction of a trail between the existing Forest Service Crow Creek Pass trail and Eagle River, and a trail over Indian Pass. Some trail work is scheduled for .the summer of 1974 in the Eagle River valley. Such trails would stimulate even more recreational use of these two route segments.

NON-RECREATIONAL USES

The highways and roads in the Anchorage area are used primarily for transportation. Similarly, the roads between Nome and Solomont Ophir and Sterling Landing, and Poorman and Ruby are used primarily for basic transportation and the hauling of goods from points of transfer to towns and mining operations. Some trail portions of the old route are similarly used as basic transportation corridors. Winter trails between villages on Norton Sound, between Unal~kleet and Kaltag, along the Yukon, 'and in the McGrath area are frequently used by local residents on snow machines to re~ch other settlements, hunting areas, or trap lines. Subsistence hunting, fishing, trapping and other ac­ tivities also take place along the route around villages. Much of this ~se is. by snow machine and to a lesser extent by dog teams. Firewood gathering and the cutting of house logs is also probably occurring along the route near villages. Mining continues on a small scale in the Ophir, Takotna, Flat and Poorman areas. lt is not known if such mining activities actually occur i~ediately adjacent to major1 trail alignments. In the Seward-Knik area residential and commercial uses may be infringing on portions of the old trails. Some of the old trail between Knik and Susitna is known to pass over private home­ steads and other property. Similarly, the towns around the Anchor­ age area have developed over parts of the old route.

Future selections of public domain lands by Natives and the State could result in additional non-recreational uses of lands along the route. Resource development by the State and Native groups is expected. The planning map developed by the State Department of Highways in July, 1973, shows proposed ·extensions of the trans­ portation system ~overing much of the historic route. Surface transportation corridors are proposed from Knik to McGrath through Rainy Pass, from Ophir to Poorman, from McGrath to Flat, and from Fairbanks to Nome via .Ruby, Kaltag, Unalakleet and around Norton Sound. Several dam proposals along the Yukon would inundate por­ tions of the route. E. CONCLUSIONS - RECO~~IENDATIONS

QUALIFICATION FOR NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL DESIGNATION

The National Trails System Act (Public Law 90-543, October 2, 1968) authorized criteria to be used in the evalua­ tion of potential additions to the system. The following guide­ lines apply to National Scenic Trails under which system this historic route is being considered:

·criterion: Because of their special characteristics National Scenic Trails should be nationally significant and be capable of attracting visitors throughout the United States.

Findings: Portions of the trail could attract visitors from throughout the U.S. as more people seek the wilderness experi­ ence. The route is unique in that it is the only major trail system still used by dog teams. Alaskan dog sled races have traditionally attracted both participants and spectators from outside Alaska. It is also exceptional in that it was and is principally a winter route. Winter recreation continues to grow nationally and long-distance winter trail travel is in increasing demand. However, because of the dependence on aircraft access and arduous trail conditions, recreational use over the entire route would probably be lo~1. MOst winter ·trail use can be ex­ pected to be by Alaskan residents in the near future.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails are designed for hiking and other compatible uses. The National Trails System Act prohibits the use of motorized equipment on these trails.

Findin~: Several portions of the route have good hiking potential, namely, the Crow Creek Pass» Indian Pass, and Rainy Pass areas. Dog mushing and cross-country skiing is occurring and are con­ sidered compatj_ble uses over these and other route segments.

Snow machines are used over portions of the old route for transportation. subsistence,' and rec.reational purposes, in­ cluding breaking trail for the dog sled race. Prohibition of such activity would undoubtedly inflict hardship on local re­ sidents. With adequate snow cover off-road vehicles are not associated with the type of terrain damage that can result on summer trails. Problems of noise and user conflicts do occur, however.

Historic travel along the route took the path of least resistence rather than a particularly scenic route. The trail was not designed for recreational hiking. •'

Criterion: National Scenic Trails of historical importance should adhere as accurately as possible to their _principal historic . routes.

Findings: Between Knik and McGrath, a w~~ter trail could be lo­ cated which would closely follow the historic route. It is not known how modern roads and trails have affected the old trails to the Ophir and.Iditarod areas or whether such trails would cover the best recreational route.

The current dog sled race deviates substantially from the traditional "Iditarod Trail" between Ophir and Kaltag. How­ ever, this route also consists of various historic routes. The route down the Yukon would probably have higher cultural and re­ creational values than the route from Ophir to Kaltag through Diskaket.

The various winter trails still in use from Kaltag to, Nome roughly follow the historic trail.

Criterion: As far as practical, national scenic trails should avoid highways, motor roads, mining areas, power transmission lines, commercial and industrial developments, range fences, and other activities that could detract from scenic interest.

Findings: From Knik to Nome no major developments exist or de­ tract from scenic interest along the route.

Except for the segments over Crow Creek Pass and Indian Pass and the branch segment over Bench Lake-Johnson Lake, most of the historic route from Seward to Knik is overlain or paralleled by roads or railroads or other development. A trail through most of these areas would not be appropriate under this system. Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be provided with ade­ quate public access through connecting local or regional trails. Access should be located at reasonable intervals to provide for trips of various lengths.

Findings: Surface access beyond Knik does not presently exist. Thus, access would be by commercial or charter aircraft. Although villages and airfields exist at periodic intervals up to 100 miles apart, ski planes can land almost anywhere in the winter and nu- merous float plane landing sites exist in the summer. ·

The segments over Crow Creek Pass and Indian Pass are accessible at either end by road. ..

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be primarily land based.

Findings: Most of the route from Seward to Unalakleet is land ' based. Considerable sections between Unalakleet and Nome cross sea and lagoon ice. The alternate route used by the dog sled race utilizes the ice of the Yukon River from Ruby to Kaltag.

Throughout the route the old trails utilized frozen rivers, lakes, and bogs. Therefore, summer overland travel is extremely difficult.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be extended trails, usually several hundred miles or more in length.

Findings: The route from Seward to Nome is approximately 1,000 miles, discounting side and branch trails. · Within this overall route many substantial trail segments exist. Mileage between Knik to McGrath is approximately 275 miles; between Knik and Idi­ tarod is 400; between McGrath and Kaltag via the Yukon River is 360; via Dishkaket is 160; between Kaltag and Nome is 280; from the south side of the Alaska Range through Rainy Pass to the ·north side is 100 miles; and the combined distance of the Crow Creek and Indian Pass segments is approximately.50 miles.

Criterion: National Scenic Trails should be continuous for their ent:J_re length.

Findings: Historically, no significant travel took place over the entire length of the route from Seward to Nome. Rather sig­ nificant travel took place from Kaltag to Nome, from the Yukon River south to Ophir and Iditarod, from Seward and Knik to Ophir and Iditarod and from Seward and Whittier to the Hope area and .to the gold fields served by Knik. Today, most use of this route continues to be over various discontinuous segments~ However, except for the urban development in the Anchorage area, a contin­ uous winter trail such as that followed by the dog sled race would be possible.

Even if it should prove undesirable or unfeasible to construct a continuous trail over the ·entire route, many segments of the route are continuous for long distances.

POTENTIAL FOR FURTHER IN-DEPTH STUDY

Most of the Seward-Nome route appears to meet the guide­ lines established for potential National Scenic Trails. The route or portions of the route possess significant historic and recreational ~···

values. Such features of the route as long-distance winter use, dog mushing use, and Alaskan gold rush history would be unique to the National Scenic Trails System and would contribute to a highly diversified national system. Further in-depth study of this route is warranted.

Segments of the route through Rainy Pass, Crow Creek Pass, and Indian Pass appear to have the highest potential for recreational use, including both winter and summer use. The segments in the Ophir-Iditarod-Flat area appear to have the greatest historic values in terms of physical remains from the gold rush era.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is recommended that an in-depth study of the Seward­ Nome route be made in accordance with Section 5(3)(b) of the National Trails System Act. Such a study would support legis­ lation and would show the following:

1. The proposed alignment of the designated trail (s).

2. The areas adjacent to such a trail(s) to be u'ti!ized for scenic, historic, natural, cultural, or developmental pur­ poses.

3. The characteristics which make the proposed trail worthy of designation as a national scenic trail.

4. The current status of land ownerships and current and poten­ tial use along the designated route.

5. The estimated cost of acquisition of lands or interest in lands, if aiJY•

6. The plans for developing and maintaining the trail and the cost thereof.

7. The proposed federal administering agency.

8. The extent to which a State or its political subdivisions and public and private organizations might reasonably be expected to participate in acquiring the necessary lands and in the administration thereof.

9. The relative uses of the land involved, including: the number of anticipated visitor-days for the entire length of, as well as for segments of, such trail; the number of months which such trail, or segments thereof, will be open for recreation purposes; the economic and social benefits which might accrue from alternate land uses; the estimated man-years of civilian employment and expenditures expected for the p~rposes of maintenance, supervision, and regulation of such trail; and the extent of non-recreational use of snow machines along the route.

10, Any special management or development provisions necessary to protect the visitor during adverse weather. F. INFORMATIONAL SOURCES

All the following references were not researched or utilized. They represent all the possible informational sources which surfaced during the course of this initial study effort which contain information on portions of the Seward to Nome route. There are undoubtedly more sources.

In addition to these documented sources there are per­ haps hundreds of persons still living having first-hand knowledge of the route. Information from such persons is invaluable to any study effort.

Information and materials supplied to this initial study by Joe and Violet Redington, F.S. Pettyjohn, Sally Jo Collins, Barbara Winkley, and from Bureau of Land Management files compiled by Bob Lund, contributed substantially to this report and are greatly appreciated. BOR/ATF

BIBLIOGRAPHY - SEWARD TO NOME ROUTE

Books

Balcom,· Mary G, Ghost Towns of Alaska, 1965.

Barry, Mary S. History of Mining on the Kenai Peninsula, 1973.

Brooks, Alfred H. Blazing Alaska's Trails, 1953.

Cadwallader, Lee. Reminiscences of the Iditarod Trailt n.d.

Cavagnel, Joseph H. Postmarked Alaska, a saga of the_ early Alaska mails.

Couch, James S. Philately Below Zero, A Postal History of Alaska, 1953.

Gideon, Kenneth M. Wandering Boy, Alaska, 1913-1918.

Gruening, Ernest. State of Alaska. e Hosley, Ed. The Kolchan, Athabascans of the Upper Kuskokwim, 1966. Hungerford, Edward. Wells Fargo Advancing the American Frontier,· 1949.

Irwin, Don L. Colorful Matanuska Valley, 1968.

Johnson, Philip R. and Charles W. Hartman. Environmental Atlas of Alaska. U.of A., l

Kitchener, L.D. Flag over the North, 1954.

Potter, Louise. Old Times on Upper Cook's Inlet.

A Study of a Frontier Town in Alaska, Wasilla to 1959, 1963. Richer, Elizabeth M. Seppala, Alaskan Dog Driver, 1930.

Ricks, Melvin B. Directory of Alaska Post Offices and Postmasters, 1965.

Sherwood, Morgan B. Exploration 0f Alaska, 1865-1900, 1965.

Ungermann, Kenneth A. The Race to Nome.

Wharton, David B. The Alaska Gold Rush, 1972

Wickersham, Judge James. Old Yukon, 1938.

~Young, S. Hall. Adventures in Alaska, 1919. BOR/ATF

Newspapers and Magazines

A1askana~ monthly publication:

"The Real Klondike," (May, 1971), 14-15. "Gold Mining at F.tat" (Aug., 1971), 5 "Alaska's Pioneer Postman," (Apr. 1972), 6-7 "Seward- the friendly gateway city,u (June, 1972), 1 11 Down the Yukon in 1899" (June, 1973), 14-15.

Alaska's ~1agazine:

"Trails to central Alaska: From Seward to the Tanana River," I, (July, '1905), 221-222. "Trail to Central Alaska," I, (Hay, 1905), 97-102.

Alaska Sportsman (later changed to Alaska Magazine):

11Apr il in Alaska' s His tory, " (Apr. , 1965) , 3 2-3 7. "This month in Northland history, 11 (Aug., 1?68), 22-24. "This month in Northland history," (Oct., 1966), 22-24. :•This month in Alaska history," (June, 1966), 37-39. "Memories of Iditarod and Ruby, 11 (Feb., 1965), 35-37. "Journey to Iditarod," (Nov., 1965), 34-37. "Sled Dog trails," (Apr., 1967), 40..:..44. "This month in Northland history," (Nov. 1968), 17-19. "Postal Service - Iditarod Trail, 1914," (Jan., 1966), ? "Postal Service- Nome," (Feb., 1968), ? "I remember Iditarod," (Sept. 1969), 14. "Rainy Pass by Dog Team," (Oct., 1965), 12. "Racing the Iditarod Trail," (Mar.-Apr., 1974), ?

Alaska-Yukon Magazine:

"The Iditarod Gold Camp," IX, (Dec., 1909), 108-113. "Alaska's newest mining camp," x. (June, 1910), 3-4. "Iditarod - What it has done and what it will do," X, (Dec., 1910), 375-384. ''A Review of the Year - the Iditarod," X, (Nov., 1910), 304-306. ''Trail Making in Alaska," XI, (July, 1911), 49-55. "The Seward-Iditarod Trail," XI, (July, 1911), 33-35. "The Innoko Diggings, 11 VIII, (Oct., 1908), ? BOR/ATF

Anchorage Daily News, "Alaska Living":

11 Fifteen Days to Iditarod," (Dec. 4, 1966). "Joe Redington, Sr. -The .Iditarod founder talks about the race," (March 31, 1974), 3-3

Anchorage Daily News and Anchorage Daily Times:

(Daily coverage of dog sled race) (March, 1973, and March, 1974)

Anchorage Daily Times:

.Lyman, Mrs. Robert F. "Oregonian Disagrees on Iditarod Feature Story," (Jan. 15, 1972), 6. (Interview with Carl Lottsfeldt). "Iditarod is Questioned," {Nov. 13, 1973), 8. · Poirier, Bernard W. "Iditarod Saved by the Weather and Remoteness, 11 (Dec. 1, 1971) 21. "Grant to Save Artifacts of Iditarod," {Jan. 25, 1972), 1. (Interview with Carl Huntington). "It was Awful Tough Race, 11 (March 25, 1974), 1, 2.

Assembly Herald, The:

"In Remotest A1aska, 11 XVIII, (June, 1912), 313-15.

Chugiak - Eagle River Star:

"Chugach State Park Planners Missed Boat," {Nov. 18, 1971), 1.

Frontiersman, The (Palmer):

"Snowmachines, Mushers,· Head for Clash Over Trails," (Jan. J, 1~74), 1. Iditarod Nugget: published weekly 9/1/10 - 8/30/11.

Iditarod Pioneer: published weekly 7/31/10- 1917.

Kuske Times, The (Takotna): 1/19/21- 12/24/37.

Overland Monthly:

11Alaska' s mail service,"· LIX, (Apr. 1912), 292-297.

Seward Weekly Gatewax: 1905-

The Washington Post - Times Herald:

Poirier,.Bernard W. 11A Ghost Town on the Edge of Nowhere," (Nov. 21, 1971), 1. BOR/ATF

Government Publications.

Alaska Department of Public Works:

Edman, Grace, Alice Hudson, Sam Johnson. Fifty Years of High­ ways, 1960.

Alaska State Department of Highways: Map- "Alaska Planning Map- Proposed.Extension of Transportation System," July, 1973.

Maps - 1/250,000 scale Maps showing Trails in Alaska with accompanying computer printout information.

Alaska State Division of Parks:

Map- "Chugach State Parks Trail System," Sept. 1, 1972.

Hanable, William. Preliminary Report on the Site of Iditarod, Jan.l972

Thompson, Linda Kay. 11 Alaska's Abandoned Towns," Historyand Archae­ ology Series No. 2, Sept. 1972.

File Material on National Historic Sites: Iyatayet Site, Anvil Creek, Knik, St. Nicholas Russian Orthodox Church, Hope Historic District.

Alaska Road Commission. Annual Reports, 1906-1931.

Glenn, Captain E.F. "A trip to the Region of the Tanana, 11 Compilation ' o~ Narratives c£ Explorations in Alaska, Government Printing Office, 1900. Federal Field Committee for Development Planning in Alaska. Alaska Natives and the Land, 1968.

Joint Federal-State Land Use Planning Commission for Alaska. Map: "Major ecosystems of Alaska," July, 1973.

Kimball, A.L. Reconnaissance Sampling of Decomposed Monzonite for ' Gold near Flat, Alaska. (Manuscript) U.S. Bureau of Mines, 1968.

Mendenhall, W.C. "A Reconnaissance from Resurrection Bay to the Tanana River, Alaska, in 1898," U.S.G.S. Annual Reportt 1898-99, Part VII, Exploration in Alaska in 1898. BOR/ATE'

U.S. Alaska Engineering Commission. Construction of the Alaska Railroad, 1919-1921.

McPherson, J .L. . "Report on K1,1skokwim Recorinai-~sance," Report of Alaska Engineering Commissio~, Appendi~ F (Jap. 3~, 1915). ·u.s. Bureau of Mines Publication. "Alask~ ·Placer Gold Production, 1880-1970."

U.S. Department of the Army, Headquarters, 4th Battalion, 230 Infantry, APO Seattle. "1,000 Mile Snowmachine Trip from Knik to Nome, Alaska," After Action Report, (April 21, 1973).

11 Iditarod· Trail, u After Action Report, (June 6, 1972).

U.S. Department of the Interior. National Register of Historic Places, 1972.

KoyukuK National Wildlife Refuge, Draft Environmental Statement, Dec. 18, 1973.

Unalakleet National Wild River, Draft Environmental Statement, Dec. 18, 1973.

Yukon-Kuskokwim National Forest, Draft Environmental Statement, Dec. 18, 1973.

u.s. Geological Survey Bulletins Nos. 259(1905), 277(1906), 284(1906), 379(1909), 410(1910), 480(1910), 520(1912), 542(1913), 578(1914), 592(1914), 622(1915), 642(1916), plus additional reports for later years, covering mineral resources in Alaska.

Maps, including the following 1/250,000 quadrangles: Seward, Anchorage, Tyonek, Talkeetna, Lime Hflls, z.tcGrath, Hedfra, Iditarod, Ophir.. Ruby, Nulato, Norton Bay, Unalakleet, Solomon and Nome, 1950-1959. U.S. War Department

Herron, Lt. J.S. "Explorations in Alaska, 1899, for an All­ American overland route from Cook Inlet, Pacific Ocean, to the Yukon," Senate Document No. XXXI. r I

BOR/ATF

Miscellaneous Sources

Communications from the Iditarod Trail Committee, 1967-1970.

Iditarod Telephone Company. Telephone Directory, Iditarod, 1911.

Iditarod Trail Race Committee. Anchorage to Nome Race, Iditarod Trail Annual, 1974

Lund, Bob. "Iditarod Trail Historic Cultural Era of Alaska, 11 (Speech), Bureau of Land Management.

Tapes of conversations with Iditarod residents. Bureau of Land Management, 1972.

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Resolution, Serial No. 73-102 on Iditarod Trail Easements, Oct. 16, 1973.

Pettyjohn, F.S. Editor, A1askana. Tapes of conversations with 11 "old timers •

Potter, Louise. Notes from Diary of Orville Herning, 1898-1946.

Sleem, David H. "The Iditarod and Kuskokwim, the Prospector's Opportunity," (Pamphlet), 1910.

Map: "Iditarod and Kuskokwim, Alaska's New and yromissing Gold Districts," Seattle-Alaska Steamship Co., 1916. • •

ALAS·KA GOLD RUSH TRAILS STUDY

I I SEWARD-NOME TRAIL Fairbanks Eagle~, • '\ I I \ Fort Selkirk I ' •

\I \

PACIFIC. OCEAN • •

i ·~ § §

S 0 U N D \ PRINCE \ 1-

SEWARD- NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

------·-----~------· MAP 2 SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15). SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15). • ·e

SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15). SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

0 10 15 Milu

------·'

SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

10 15 M~ot '--

SEWARD- NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

0 10 '

MAP 8 SEWARD- NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

5 10 SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to lost mop (no. 15). SEWARD- NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

0 10 1e L_~ •

SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

0 5 10 •

I

\

SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no.15).

5 10 •

'I

+. + S 0 U N D

SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (l)o. 15). •

+

0

+ + 0 + + + N N 0 s 0 N D

MAP 14 0 SEWARD- NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).

oP-==-95---"'''i,o;r====t,s Mile:s

------"- •

+ SEWARD-NOME TRAIL LEGEND --- - Major Route ...... - Route Followed by 1973 & 1974 Dog Sled Race - Other Branch or Alternate Routes I I I - WAN CATS Te 1egraph L1 ne - Roadhouse Site or Shelter Cabin .e ·-o-• Sites on tlational Register of + Historic Places - Existinq Tovms or Villages •0 - Abandoned Towns Site Site Name _llQ,_ !!.~ J!.2.:.. ..v 1. Se1·1ard lfl. Dikeman 0 2. flope 19. r1oore City ,., ~ 3. llope Historic District 211. Ophir ' l 7' Dishkaket ~- \ 0 4. Sunrise 21. '· .... N 5. Gird11ood 22. Ruby 6. Anchorage 23. Galena <9' tl'J'. 7. Eklutna 24. Koyukuk !l. Old St. nicholas Russian ~5 . Nulato I .¢' ··"' Orthodox Church 26. Kaltag I 0 + 9. Knik 27. Shaktoolik '+ 4 + s lll. t:nik Historic Site 23. Iyatayet Historic Site + + 0 ' [}' 11. Susitna 29. Koyuk ,: ~-' N D 12. tkflrath 31l. Unalakleet 13. Takotna 31. Golovin 14. Discovery 32. White ~fountain G 15. Flat 33. Nome 16. Otter 34. /\nvi 1 Creek Historic Site 17. . l di taro<:! MAP· 15 SEWARD-NOME TRAIL

LEGEND: See fold out attached to last map (no. 15).