Top 100 Carbon-Producing Sites. Emissions in Million Tonnes CO2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Top 100 carbon-producing sites. Emissions in million tonnes CO2 0.2 Flotta oil terminal Power stations Others 0.2 St Fergus gas terminal 0.2 Sage terminal 2.5 Peterhead 0.2 Fife ethylene plant 0.7 Grangemouth 1.6 Innovene Grangemouth refinery 0.8 Innovene 8.4 Longannet 0.3 Innovene Grangemouth Chemicals 2.7 Cockenzie 0.2 DSM Dalry 0.7 Coolkeeragh 2.7 Lynemouth 2.3 Premier Power 2.3 AES Kilroot Power Ltd. 0.3 Thrislington works lime kiln plant 0.2 ConocoPhillips 0.6 Fellside 0.3 Corus, Shapfell 6.4 Teesside iron and steel 5.2 Teeside BNFL Sellafield 0.9 SembCorp 520 tonnes, 33 over allowance 0.3 Petroplus refining 0.4 N&S Morecambe, Rivers 0.2 Morecambe central processing 1.0 Roosecote Drax power station 20.8m tonnes 1.0 Ribblesdale works 0.6 South Ferriby 7.2 Eggborough 0.5 Killingholme UMIST, Manchester 8.4 Ferrybridge C 0 tonnes, 7,712 below allowance 0.2 3.6 Saltend Cogeneration 0.3 Runcorn 1.3 Centrica Killingholme 2.9 Stallingborough Halochemicals Redfearn 2.3 Humber refinery 0.2 Salt Union glass 6.0 Scunthorpe 0.2 Acordis 3.0 Petroleum Processes 8.5 Fiddlers Ferry iron and steel 0.3 1.7 Lindsey oil refinery 1.7 Rocksavage 1.3 Keadby Glanford Brigg 3.4 Connah’s Quay 0.5 Shotton 0.7 Winnington 8.4 West Burton 0.9 0.5 Cottam Deeside development 8.1 Cottam 0.3 Padeswood works 0.8 Derwent 0.2 Tullow 4.2 Rugeley 8.6 Ratcliffe on Soar oil, Bacton 3.1 Ironbridge 0.3 King’s Lynn 1.9 EDF Energy 1.0 Ketton works 1.0 Rugby Works 0.4 Peterborough Jaguar, Brown’s lane, Coventry 0.9 Gt Yarmouth 17,074 tonnes, 4,259 over allowance 0.3 Barrington works 0.3 Corby Didcot A power station, Oxfordshire 6.3m tonnes, 2.2m over allowance 1.4 Little Barford 1.0 Total Milford Haven 2.3 Texaco Pembroke 6.1 Port Talbot steelworks 5.3 Aberthaw 1.0 Uskmouth 0.8 Enfield 1.4 Scottish Power 1.1 Baglan Bay 1.4 Seabank Power energy Generation Rye House 0.3 Barry 6.3 Didcot A 5.2 Tilbury 3.0 Didcot B 2.7 Barking 2.0 BP oil UK 0.2 Tate & Lyle St Thomas’ hospital, London 1.6 Coryton 14,608 tonnes, 2,919 over allowance 0.2 Littlebrook 1.5 Medway Power 7.8 1.6 0.2 Grain BBC Media village, London Kings North 3,511 tonnes, 5,103 below allowance Damhead Creek 3.1 Esso Petroleum 0.6 Fawley 0.2 ExxonMobil 1.0 Shoreham .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task
The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Issue 1 May 2010 DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task Restricted – Commercial AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Title The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010: Industry Sector Task Customer DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment Customer reference NAEI Framework Agreement/DA GHGI Improvement Programme Confidentiality, Crown Copyright copyright and reproduction File reference 45322/2008/CD6774/GT Reference number AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 /Issue 1 AEA Group 329 Harwell Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QJ Tel.: 0870 190 6584 AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Authors Name Stuart Sneddon and Glen Thistlethwaite Approved by Name Neil Passant Signature Date 20th May 2010 ii AEA Restricted – Commercial DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Executive Summary This research has been commissioned under the UK and DA GHG inventory improvement programme, and aims to research emissions data for a group of source sectors and specific sites where uncertainties have been identified in the scope and accuracy of available source data. Primarily this research aims to review site-specific data and regulatory information, to resolve differences between GHG data reported across different emission reporting mechanisms. The research has comprised: 1) Data review from different reporting mechanisms (IPPC, EU ETS and EEMS) to identify priority sites (primarily oil & gas terminals, refineries and petrochemicals), i.e.
[Show full text]
A Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster
Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – a Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT July 2016 A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A group consisting of private sector companies, public sector bodies, and leading UK academics has been brought together by the UKCCSRC to identify and address actions that need to be taken in order to deliver a CCS based decarbonisation option for the UK in line with recommendations made by the Committee on Climate Change (i.e. 4-7GW of power CCS plus ~3MtCO2/yr of industry CCS by 2030). At an initial meeting (see https://ukccsrc.ac.uk/about/delivering-cost-effective-ccs-2020s-new-start) it was agreed that a series of regionally focussed meetings should take place, and Yorkshire Humber (which also naturally extended to possible links with Teesside) was the first such region to be addressed. Conclusions Reached No. Conclusion Conclusion 1.1 The existence within Yorkshire Humber of a number of brownfield locations with existing infrastructure and planning consents means that the region remains a likely UK CCS cluster region. Conclusion 1.2 Demise of coal fired power plants in the Aire Valley will see the loss of coal handling infrastructure and new handling facilities would need to be developed for biomass-based projects Conclusion 2.1 For Yorkshire Humber it is the choice of storage location that determines whether any pipeline infrastructure would route primarily north or south of the Humber. Conclusion 2.2 For Yorkshire Humber (and Teesside) there exist only 3 beach crossing points and two viable shipping locations for export of CO2 offshore (or for import, for transfer to storage).
[Show full text]
Download Original Attachment
Operator Name Location Name Address Name Address Street Address Town Address County Address Postcode 1 Address Postcode 2 Incumbent Duty Type Text Previous Name LA Code Local Authority Country AMG Superalloys UK Limited Rotherham Fullerton Road Rotherham South Yorkshire S60 1DL COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Ltd) 4415 Rotherham England Anglian Water Services Limited Wing Water Treatment Works Morcott Road Oakham Rutland LE15 8SA COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2470 Rutland UA England Arch Timber Protection Limited Huddersfield Huddersfield Works Leeds Road Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD2 1YU COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Arch UK Biocides Ltd) 4715 Kirklees England Argenta Dundee Limited Dundee Dunsinane Industrial Estate Kinnoull Road Dundee Angus DD2 3XR COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Vericore Limited) 9059 Dundee UA Scotland Associated British Ports Immingham Dock Immingham Dock Immingham Lincolnshire DN40 2NS COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Associated Petroleum Terminals (Immingham) Limited Immingham Main Terminal Queens Road Immingham North East Lincolnshire DN40 2PN COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Avanti Gas Limited Ellesmere Port Britannia Road Ellesmere Port Cheshire CH65 4HB COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Shell Gas Limited) 4325 Wirral England Avara Avlon Pharma Services Limited Avlon Works Severn Road Bristol South Gloucestershire BS10 7ZE COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was AstraZeneca UK Limited) 0119 South Gloucs UA England BAE Systems
[Show full text]
Buncefield Report
BUNCEFIELD MAJOR INCIDENT INVESTIGATION Initial Report to the Health and Safety Commission and the Environment Agency of the investigation into the explosions and fires at the Buncefield oil storage and transfer depot, Hemel Hempstead, on 11 December 2005 Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board a b BUNCEFIELD MAJOR INCIDENT INVESTIGATION Initial Report to the Health and Safety Commission and the Environment Agency of the investigation into the explosions and fires at the Buncefield oil storage and transfer depot, Hemel Hempstead, on 11 December 2005 Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board i ii Contents Executive summary iv Introduction 1 Part 1 – Summary of the incident and subsequent Investigation 5 M Overview of Buncefield operations 5 M Timeline of key events 7 M Emergency response to the Buncefield incident 10 M The Investigation 11 Part 2 – Issues of concern arising from the Investigation to date 18 M Design and operation of storage sites 18 M Emergency response to incidents 21 M Advice to planning authorities 23 Annexes 1 Terms of reference and progress 24 2 Members of the independent Board 27 3 Planning history of Buncefield site and neighbouring developments 28 4 UK petroleum refinery, pipeline and storage system 35 5 Incidents that have similarities with the Buncefield incident 37 6 Fire and explosion hazards from petrol 39 7 Product composition at Buncefield 44 8 Regulatory framework for high hazard sites 46 9 Regulation of perfluorooctane sulphonates (PFOS) 49 10 Legal considerations 51 Glossary 54 Further information 58 iii iv Executive summary The terms of reference of the Investigation directed by the Health and Safety Commission into the explosions and fires at the Buncefield oil storage and transfer depot, Hemel Hempstead, on 11 December 2005 require an initial report to be produced for the Health and Safety Commission and the Environment Agency when the main facts of the incident have been established.
[Show full text]
Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Oil Refining and Petrochemical Industry Reference Number: PH3/8 Date Issued: June 1999
The reduction of greenhouse gas emission from the oil refining and petrochemical industry Report Number PH3/8 June 1999 This document has been prepared for the Executive Committee of the Programme. It is not a publication of the Operating Agent, International Energy Agency or its Secretariat. Title: The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from the oil refining and petrochemical industry Reference number: PH3/8 Date issued: June 1999 Other remarks: Background to the Study The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D programme (IEA GHG) is systematically evaluating the cost and potential for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases arising from anthropogenic activities, especially the use of fossil fuels. Greenhouse gases are produced from a variety of industrial activities. The main sources, not related to power generation, are those energy intensive industries, which chemically or physically transform materials from one state to another. During these processes, many greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) are released. One notable example is oil refining and petrochemicals where considerable amounts of greenhouse gases are produced. Relatively little attention has been focused on the abatement/mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial sector. This study is the second in a series looking at greenhouse gas abatement/mitigation options for energy intensive industries. Carbon dioxide, methane and other hydrocarbons are emitted during the refining of oil, production of petrochemicals and the storage of feedstocks and products. The purpose of this study is to consider the abatement/mitigation options in the oil refining and petrochemicals industry. The study was carried out by AEA Technology of the United Kingdom.
[Show full text]
Fuelling the UK's Future
Fuelling the UK’s future Fuelling the UK’s Fuelling the UK’s future - the role of our refining and downstream oil industry www.ukpia.com November 2011 www.ukpia.com About UKPIA UKPIA represents the non-commercial interests of and speaks for ten companies involved in the UK downstream oil industry, whose activities cover refining, storage and distribution, and marketing of petroleum products. UKPIA members: • own the 8 main UK oil refineries that processed 73 million tonnes of crude oil and produced 75.4 million tonnes of refined products in 2010 (Source: DECC- DUKES data) • supply close to 90% of the inland market for petroleum products; and • own around 2,200 of the 8,787 filling stations in the UK. Our members are: Copyright & Acknowledgments Charts, data and references to reports are reproduced or referred to in this publication either with the permission of the source as indicated or otherwise from information sources within the public domain. Reproduction of UKPIA content is permitted with appropriate acknowledgement. © UKPIA November 2011 Fuelling the UK’s future 2 Contents page Introduction UKPIA President 5 Fuelling the UK’s future - in brief 6 Executive summary 7 1. Energy supply and demand overview 12 1.1 Global energy overview 12 1.2 UK overall oil supply/demand and future forecasts 13 2. Energy and investment 15 2.1 Oil reserves 15 2.2 Meeting future energy needs requires substantial investment 15 2.3 Refinery investment 15 3. UK oil refining industry: role and benefits 17 3.1 Overview of the UK industry 17 3.2 Contribution 19 3.2.1 Consumers and the economy 19 3.2.2 Security of supply 21 3.2.2 Employment, skills, technological expertise and other industries 21 3.2.4 Environmental benefits 23 Case study: Pembroke Refinery contribution to local economy 24 4.
[Show full text]
A Lifecycle Assessment of Petroleum Processing Activities in the United Kingdom
From Ground to Gate: A lifecycle assessment of petroleum processing activities in the United Kingdom Reyn OBorn Master in Industrial Ecology Submission date: June 2012 Supervisor: Anders Hammer Strømman, EPT Co-supervisor: Olav Bolland, EPT Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of Energy and Process Engineering Abstract Petroleum products are an important component of today’s societal energy needs. Petroleum powers everything from the vehicles people rely on, to the ships that carry goods around the world, to the heating of homes in colder climates. The petroleum process chain is complex and the environmental impacts within the process chain are not always well understood. A deeper understanding of where emissions come from along the process chain will help policy makers in the path towards a less carbon intensive society. One of the core processes of the petroleum process chain is refining. Petroleum refining is a complicated process which can have varying crude inputs and varying fuel outputs depending upon the refinery make-up, the crude blend and the market conditions at the time of production. The goal of this paper is to introduce a lifecycle analysis on the UK petroleum refining sector. Where emissions occur along the process chain and which fuels cause the most pollution on a per unit basis will be reported and discussed using lifecycle analysis framework. The refining process is difficult to maneuver around and it can be difficult to discern which processes create which products. The analysis is broadened to understand the refining emissions associated with different fuel types at both a process and country level.
[Show full text]
The Economic Contribution of the Uk Downstream Oil Sector
THE ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF THE UK DOWNSTREAM OIL SECTOR FEBRUARY 2019 Petroleum_Word_cover.indd 1 05/02/2019 16:21 The Economic Contribution of the UK Downstream Oil Sector February 2019 All data shown in tables and charts are Oxford Economics’ own data, except where otherwise stated and cited in footnotes, and are copyright © Oxford Economics Ltd. This report is confidential to UKPIA and may not be published or distributed without their prior written permission. The modelling and results presented here are based on information provided by third parties, upon which Oxford Economics has relied in producing its report and forecasts in good faith. Any subsequent revision or update of those data will affect the assessments and projections shown. To discuss the report further please contact: Andrew P Goodwin: [email protected] Oxford Economics Broadwall House, 21 Broadwall, London, SE1 9PL, UK Tel: +44 203 910 8000 2 20190205 UKPIA PRESS.pdf 2 06/02/2019 11:08 The Economic Contribution of the UK Downstream Oil Sector FOREWORD Stephen Marcos Jones Director General, UKPIA The UK’s downstream oil sector is going through a transformation. The long-term trends—shifting product demand, misalignment of supply and demand, and ensuring the UK remains an attractive place to do business— continue to challenge the UK Petroleum Industry Association (UKPIA) and our membership. But there is change ahead for all elements of the sector, as the government rightly pursues its ambitions to reduce carbon emissions and those of other pollutants. We are firmly behind these goals, which benefit the communities in which we want to continue to work and prosper.
[Show full text]
Total Lindsey Oil Refinery Limited the Installation Is: Total Lindsey Oil Refinery This Variation Notice Number Is: EPR/TP3633NH/V004
Environment Agency Review of an Environmental Permit for an Installation subject to Chapter II of the Industrial Emissions Directive under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 Decision document recording our decision-making process following review of a permit The Permit number is: EPR/TP3633NH The Operator is: Total Lindsey Oil Refinery Limited The Installation is: Total Lindsey Oil Refinery This Variation Notice number is: EPR/TP3633NH/V004 Consultation commences on: 25/10/18 Consultation ends on: 22/11/18 What this document is about Article 21(3) of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) requires the Environment Agency to review conditions in permits that it has issued and to ensure that the permit delivers compliance with relevant standards, within four years of the publication of updated decisions on BAT conclusions. We have reviewed the permit for this installation against the revised BAT Conclusions for the refining of mineral oil and gas industry sector published on 28th October 2014. This is our decision document, which explains the reasoning for the consolidated variation notice that we are issuing. It explains how we have reviewed and considered the techniques used by the Operator in the operation and control of the plant and activities of the installation. This review has been undertaken with reference to the decision made by the European Commission establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions (‘BAT Conclusions’) for the refining of mineral oil and gas as detailed in document reference IEDC-7-1. It is our record of our decision- making process and shows how we have taken into account all relevant factors in reaching our position.
[Show full text]
ABB Lummus Global Technical Information Package for Shell
Technical Information Package for Shell Thermal Conversion Technologies Proposal No. 3-3676 ABB Lummus Global ABB Lummus Global B.V. TECHNICAL INFORMATION PACKAGE -- 30927,0 DMS 1 0 SSVB - TECHNICAL INFORMATION PACKAGE INDEX 30927LDR-0 Index 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 VISBREAKER HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENTS 1.2 CHEMISTRY OF VISBREAKING 1.3 CONVERSION AND VISCOSITY REDUCTION 1.4 PRODUCT PROPERTIES AND USE 2. TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW 2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 SHELL SOAKER VISBREAKING TECHNOLOGY 2.3 VACUUM FLASHER TECHNOLOGY 2.4 SHELL DEEP THERMAL CONVERSION TECHNOLOGY 2.5 SHELL THERMAL GASOIL PROCESS 2.6 UPGRADING POSSIBILITIES FOR THE VISBREAKER UNITS 2.7 PLANT AVAILABILITY 3. COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES 3.1 COMPARISON SHELL SOAKER VISBREAKER VS. COIL VISBREAKER TECHNOLOGY 3.2 LICENSING FROM ABB LUMMUS GLOBAL 4. EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 4.1 LICENSE SUMMARY LGV SFOR 03-2000-01.001 (1996-06-20) DMS, propla0.dot , 1 30927LDR-0 /N24P0845.001 30927,0 Page 1 of 1 ABB Lummus Global B.V. TECHNICAL INFORMATION PACKAGE -- 30928,0 DMS 1 0 SSVB - TECHNICAL INFORMATION PACKAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 30928LDR-0 1. Introduction 1.1 VISBREAKER HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENTS Thermal cracking units built before 1930 were plagued with coking and mechanical prob- lems. In these units, cracking was initiated in a heater and completed in a soaking drum. Runs were short, largely because the important parameters of cracking were not well under- stood. Because of the problems with coke formation in the soaking drum, visbreakers after 1933 were the coil cracking type. The soaking drum was eliminated and the heater outlet tem- perature increased, so that all cracking could take place in the heater.
[Show full text]
MAJOR FACILITIES WHERE I-ROD® IS INSTALLED I-Rod Has Been Installed Many Thousands of Times Worldwide Since We Began Offering It in 1989
stoprust.com EXPERIENCE ExxonMobil refinery in Baton Rouge. Photo by Adbar MAJOR FACILITIES WHERE I-ROD® IS INSTALLED I-Rod has been installed many thousands of times worldwide since we began offering it in 1989. Most I-Rod products are sold through OEM companies, supply houses and distributors, so end- users are not always known to us. This is a partial list of positively identified major refineries and plants using I-Rod pipe supports. CARSON REFINERY (TESORO), CARSON, CA Carson has a throughput capacity of 363,000 barrels per day. The TESORO Los Angeles Refinery - Carson Operations in Carson, California occupies 650 acres and employs more than 1,000. The refinery can process 265,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce a variety of petroleum products including gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel and petroleum coke, as well as products such as propylene, natural gas liquids and other petrochemicals. GOLDEN EAGLE REFINERY (TESORO), MARTINEZ, CA Tesoro’s Martinez Refinery is located in Martinez, Calif. near San Francisco on 2,200 acres and has a crude oil capacity of 166,000 barrels per day (bpd). It produces motor fuels, including cleaner-burning California Air Resources Board (CARB) gasoline and CARB diesel fuel, as well as conventional gasoline and diesel fuel. The refinery also produces heavy fuel oils, liquefied petroleum gas and petroleum coke. LOS ANGELES REFINERY (TESORO), WILMINGTON, CA Tesoro’s Los Angeles refinery is located near the Port of Long Beach on 930 acres. It’s the largest refinery on the West Coast and is a major producer of clean fuels.
[Show full text]
Oil, Gas and Chemical Processing Track Record
Oil, Gas and Chemical Processing Track Record Proven performance for oil and gas assets Contents What does A COMPLETE RANGE OF SOLUTIONS 04 PASSIVE FIRE Our goal is to provide our customers with solutions to all of their PROTECTION ‘track record’ coating needs. From passive fire protection to high heat and linings, we offer a complete range of quality coating solutions. • Our Chartek® brand provides market leading epoxy passive fire protection mean to you? • Our Intertherm® range delivers temperature resistant solutions for insulated and non-insulated steelwork 08 TEMPERATURE • Our Interline®, Enviroline® and Ceilcote® brands mean we can offer linings solutions for a wide range RESISTANCE of cargos and secondary containment areas. SUSTAINABILITY As part of AkzoNobel, we are committed to sustainability and are ranked as one of the chemical industry leaders in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index, demonstrating our commitment 12 LININGS to improving our environmental and social performance. We will work with you to help ensure that your coating specification meets your overall sustainable design credentials. To us, a comprehensive and wide Trust is about GLOBAL ORGANISATION reaching track record means ‘trust’. Whether it is worldwide maintenance specifications, new delivering solutions build projects spanning the globe or local expansion and • Trust that you are in partnership with the world’s refurbishment work, our globally available product range, largest coatings supplier, a company with more that work, whatever supported by local distribution and manufacturing sites, 16 OIL REFINERIES than 35 years of experience in the market helps reduce complexity and ensure quality. For us this the environment means one product one datasheet regardless of location, • Trust that our products and systems with local support teams providing expert advice when perform over and over again thanks to our whatever the location.
[Show full text]