Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Oil Refining and Petrochemical Industry Reference Number: PH3/8 Date Issued: June 1999

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Oil Refining and Petrochemical Industry Reference Number: PH3/8 Date Issued: June 1999 The reduction of greenhouse gas emission from the oil refining and petrochemical industry Report Number PH3/8 June 1999 This document has been prepared for the Executive Committee of the Programme. It is not a publication of the Operating Agent, International Energy Agency or its Secretariat. Title: The reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from the oil refining and petrochemical industry Reference number: PH3/8 Date issued: June 1999 Other remarks: Background to the Study The IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D programme (IEA GHG) is systematically evaluating the cost and potential for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases arising from anthropogenic activities, especially the use of fossil fuels. Greenhouse gases are produced from a variety of industrial activities. The main sources, not related to power generation, are those energy intensive industries, which chemically or physically transform materials from one state to another. During these processes, many greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) are released. One notable example is oil refining and petrochemicals where considerable amounts of greenhouse gases are produced. Relatively little attention has been focused on the abatement/mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial sector. This study is the second in a series looking at greenhouse gas abatement/mitigation options for energy intensive industries. Carbon dioxide, methane and other hydrocarbons are emitted during the refining of oil, production of petrochemicals and the storage of feedstocks and products. The purpose of this study is to consider the abatement/mitigation options in the oil refining and petrochemicals industry. The study was carried out by AEA Technology of the United Kingdom. Industry overview Oil refining involves breaking down and separating the complex mixture of hydrocarbons in crude oils into standard fuel and non-fuel products. These products include; gasoline, diesel oil, heavy fuel oil, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), bitumen and lubricants. Crude oil and natural gas are also raw materials for petrochemicals such as polymers, certain alcohols and other chemical products. Refineries, worldwide, process 10 million tonnes of crude oil per day. Large refineries produce the full range of products while smaller refineries may make only gasoline, diesel and heating fuels. Refining processes can be grouped into three classes: • separation (usually distillation) • conversion (usually thermal, catalytic or hydrocracking) • upgrading (e.g. HDS1, demetallisation, hydrocracking, catalytic cracking, coking) A refinery is a highly complex and integrated installation requiring many auxiliary facilities, including large storage facilities for feedstocks and products, extensive port and dock facilities, and on-site services such as electricity, heat and cooling. Heat is used in the many distillation, conversion, reforming and finishing (product purification) processes in the refinery, with considerable attention paid to heat integration. Motive power to turn pumps and other equipment is normally provided by 1 Hydro-desulphurisation i electricity, often generated on site. Refineries are typically fuelled by crude oil or by waste products from the conversion processes, but sometimes use coal or natural gas as well, depending on local supplies. Refining is closely related to the marketing of refined products. Both parts of the industry are closely regulated by legislation. It is essentially a commodity industry with stiff competition. The rate of return on capital is, in general, relatively low, at least in Europe. Despite this general situation, the refining industry in OECD countries has been able to adjust to stricter product quality requirements, making the necessary investments as regulations change. When addressing emissions from the refining industry it should be made clear that this is only one of the elements in the total chain from production of oil to delivery of the final service to the user, i.e. transport, work or heat. Life cycle analysis, both at the level of the overall chain and at the more detailed level of individual products, can be a revealing way of understanding the impact of different options but is outside the scope of this report. This report covers the following areas • Greenhouse gas emissions from oil refining and petrochemical processes globally. • The principal types and sizes of refining operations within (i) Europe (ii) North America (iii) South America (iv) Japan (v) Asia, identifying areas of likely expansion, outlining the main processing steps, the chemistry involved and the types of fuels used. • Current environmental legislation, pressure for ‘green’ products and how these will affect future refinery practice and the products produced. • All emissions from a typical plant as well as current recovery processes for minimising waste. • Future technological developments and any barriers to development of these technologies together with potential costs and timescales of implementation. • Future emissions to the year 2020 with consideration of future developments. Results and Discussion Many changes have occurred in the refining business, dictated largely by the demands of the market place with decreasing demand for heavy fuel oils and increasing demand for lighter transportation fuels, together with increasing environmental constraints. At the same time, there has generally been an increase in pressure to produce ‘greener’ products, such as unleaded petrol, low benzene and low sulphur fuels, and low aromatic solvents. Restrictions on sulphur content, in particular, have greenhouse gas implications for refineries. Future trends will continue towards larger and more complex refineries with the capacity for deep conversion processing of heavier crudes to lighter products. To compete with this trend, current refineries will have to expand to incorporate more processing units and increased desulphurisation capacity. Refineries and petrochemical plants are a potential source of atmospheric emissions of carbon dioxide 2 (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH4), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs ), sulphur, reduced sulphur compounds and oxides of sulphur, ammonia, oxides of nitrogen, toxic organic micropollutants (dioxins, PAHs3), heavy metals, particulates and odour. Global estimates of greenhouse gases from oil refining and petrochemicals production are shown in Table 1. 2 Volatile Organic Compounds 3 Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons ii CO2 CH4 N2O Refineries 686.9 Mt/yr in 1994 5-45 Kt/yr in 1994 1-6 Kt/yr Petrochemicals 520 Mt/yr in 1996 Not estimated 150-600 Kt/yr (adipic acid manufacture) Table 1. Global emissions from oil refining and petrochemicals The largest emission sources are associated with energy use, as shown by the breakdown of sources given in Table 2: Source Percent of refinery CO2 emissions Oil and gas fuel firing of furnaces and boilers 65% Regeneration of cat cracker catalyst 16% Flares < 3% Methane steam reforming to make hydrogen 2% Incineration and effluent processes 1% Power (55% imported) 13% Table 2 Sources of refinery CO2 emissions Typical CO2 concentrations in refinery vent gases are: 4 • From combustion plant, furnaces, boilers, flares and FCC regenerators: about 13% CO2. • From gas turbine power generators or machinery-drives: about 3% CO2. • From steam reforming process for H2 generation: up to 100% CO2. Options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from refineries include: • refinery process optimisation; • refinery use of non-carbon-based energy sources; • reducing the carbon content of fuels; • optimising the efficiency of heat and power production and use; • reducing the amount of wastes flared; • CO2 capture and disposal. Refinery operators aim to obtain the maximum yield of valuable products for the minimum cost. These aims are consistent with minimising greenhouse gas emissions from refineries - any carbon in crude, which is not incorporated into fuels, petrochemical feedstocks or other products will mostly, sooner or later, be emitted into the atmosphere as CO2, CO or VOCs. Carbon monoxide and VOCs in their turn will be converted by atmospheric processes into CO2. An important aspect of refinery design and operation is to ensure that every process operates with maximum efficiency and minimum energy input. Low-value product or waste such as process off- gases provides much of the energy requirement. Natural gas, LNG, LPG, coal-bed methane or indeed refinery gas have lower carbon-to-hydrogen ratios than fuel oils, and will give lower greenhouse gas emissions for a given unit of energy. Gas- fired power generation is highly efficient, and future developments are expected to focus on incremental improvements to combined-cycle gas turbine technology which could allow efficiencies of up to 60% to be reached over the next decade. 4 Fluid bed catalytic cracker iii Refineries may generate their own power or purchase it from outside. Some alternative energy sources may be more suitable for internal use, some will only be usable as an external source; possible examples range through nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, hydro. Following a series of incidents around the world, in much of Europe and North America, nuclear power has lost its mid-century image as the clean technology of the future. Elsewhere nuclear power retains importance, particularly in countries without substantial oil reserves. In Japan, for example, where nuclear power meets about 14% of the national energy needs, the nuclear share of electricity generation is likely
Recommended publications
  • Transportation and Storage
    TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE Baker & O'Brien consultants have considerable experience in the transportation, storage, and distribution of energy raw materials and finished products. We are RELATED SERVICES frequently called upon to analyze the costs associated with truck, rail, pipeline, and/or marine transportation of crude oil, petroleum products, and chemical feedstocks. We Accident/Incident Investigation undertake feasibility studies associated with pipelines and petroleum storage facilities. Asset Valuations We investigate the source and implications of leaks, fires, explosions, and other Due Diligence and Advisor to operating incidents that periodically occur during the operation of such facilities. Our Lenders and Investors consultants have provided evidence and expert testimony regarding proper Engineering, Procurement, and maintenance and safe operating practices for all types of transportation systems. Construction (EPC) Markets and Strategy Merger and Acquisition Support PRIMARY CONTACTS Property Damage and Business Interruption Insurance Claims Technology Assessment Robert L. Beck Consultant Houston William D. Jackson, Ph.D. Consultant Dallas Amy L. Kalt Consultant, Manager of Analytical Services Houston © 2021 Baker & O'Brien, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 of 22 TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE Charles G. Kemp Vice President, Business Development Manager Dallas RELATED EXPERIENCE Bankruptcy Reorganization Developed, in conjunction with senior management, reorganization plans for various operating segments of a major trading and transport company. The resulting business plan formed the foundation of the company's successful reorganization and emergence from bankruptcy. Bitumen Valuation Study Developed a methodology using a marker crude oil to value bitumen at the production site. Methodology addressed differences in qualities (sulfur, acid number) and refining yields. Transportation costs from the valuation hub to the production site were developed.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Energy Corridor Year Event 1868 Louisiana's First Well, an Exploratory Well Near Bayou Choupique, Hackberry, LA Was a Dry Hole
    AAmmeerriiccaa’’ss EEnneerrggyy CCoorrrriiddoorr LOUISIANA Serving the Nation’s Energy Needs LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES SECRETARY SCOTT A. ANGELLE A state agency report on the economic impacts of the network of energy facilities and energy supply of America’s Wetland. www.dnr.state.la.us America’s Energy Corridor LOUISIANA Serving the Nation’s Energy Needs Prepared by: Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Office of the Secretary, Scott A. Angelle Technology Assessment Division T. Michael French, P.E., Director William J. Delmar, Jr., P.E., Assistant Director Paul R. Sprehe, Energy Economist (Primary Author) Acknowledgements: The following individuals and groups have contributed to the research and compilation of this report. Collaborators in this project are experts in their field of work and are greatly appreciated for their time and assistance. State Library of Louisiana, Research Librarians U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Richard Furiga (Ret.) Dave Johnson Ann Rochon Nabil Shourbaji Robert Meyers New Orleans Region Office Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (LOOP) Louisiana Offshore Terminal Authority (LOTA) La. Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office, Dr. Karolien Debusschere ChevronTexaco and Sabine Pipeline, LLC Port Fourchon Executive Director Ted Falgout Louisiana I Coalition Executive Director Roy Martin Booklet preparation: DNR Public Information Director Phyllis F. Darensbourg Public Information Assistant Charity Glaser For copies of this report, contact the DNR Public Information Office at 225-342-0556 or email request to [email protected]. -i- CONTENTS America’s Energy Corridor LOUISIANA Serving the Nation’s Energy Needs……………………………………………... i Contents…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. ii Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… iii Fact Sheet………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Large Floating Structure with Free-Floating, Self-Stabilizing Tanks for Hydrocarbon Storage
    energies Article Large Floating Structure with Free-Floating, Self-Stabilizing Tanks for Hydrocarbon Storage Jian Dai 1,* , Kok Keng Ang 2,*, Jingzhe Jin 3, Chien Ming Wang 4 , Øyvind Hellan 3 and Arnstein Watn 5 1 Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore 3 SINTEF Ocean, 7052 Trondheim, Norway 4 School of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia 5 SINTEF, 7465 Trondheim, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.D.); [email protected] (K.K.A.) Received: 30 July 2019; Accepted: 6 September 2019; Published: 10 September 2019 Abstract: Hydrocarbon is a major source of energy for sustainable development. Storage of hydrocarbon products, however, requires a significant amount of land space to land-scarce countries like Singapore. This paper presents an alternative way of storing hydrocarbon in Singapore coastal waters through the innovative design of a floating hydrocarbon storage facility. The design comprises free-floating and self-stabilizing tanks enclosed by barges that form a floating hydrocarbon storage facility. The tanks are made of prestressed concrete and they are designed to be self-stabilized when floating in the sea water. Owing to the lack of available design guidelines, design requirements on the stability and motion criteria for floating storage tanks are developed based on a review of existing codes of practice and design specifications for both onshore tanks and offshore vessels. A comprehensive study on the hydrostatic performance of various proposed floating tank design concepts with different storage capacities is carried out.
    [Show full text]
  • Winning the Oil Endgame: Innovation for Profits, Jobs, and Security Oil Dependence
    “We’ve embarked on the beginning of the Last Days of the Age of Oil. Nations of the world that are striving to modernize will make choices different from the ones we have made. They will have to. And even today’s industrial powers will shift energy use patterns....[T]he market share for carbon-rich fuels will diminish, as the demand for other forms of energy grows. And energy companies have a choice: to embrace the future and recognize the growing demand for a wide array of fuels; or ignore reality, and slowly—but surely—be left behind.” —Mike Bowlin, Chairman and CEO, ARCO, and Chairman, American Petroleum Institute, 9 Feb. 1999 1 “My personal opinion is that we are at the peak of the oil age and at the same time the begin- ning of the hydrogen age. Anything else is an interim solution in my view. The transition will be very messy, and will take many and diverse competing technological paths, but the long- term future will be in hydrogen and fuel cells.” —Herman Kuipers, Business Team Manager, Innovation & Research, Shell Global Solutions, 1. Bowlin 1999. 21 Nov. 2000 2 2. Kuipers 2000. “The days of the traditional oil company are numbered, in part because of emerging technolo- gies such as fuel cells....” 3. Bijur, undated. — Peter I. Bijur, Chairman and CEO, Texaco, Inc., late 1990s 3 4. Ingriselli 2001. “Market forces, greenery, and innovation are shaping the future of our industry and propelling 5. Gibson-Smith 1998. us inexorably towards hydrogen energy. Those who don’t pursue it…will rue it.” — Frank Ingriselli, President, Texaco Technology 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Management of India
    DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDIA DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2011 This book has been prepared under the GoI-UNDP Disaster Risk Reduction Programme (2009-2012) DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDIA Ministry of Home Affairs Government of India c Disaster Management in India e ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The perception about disaster and its management has undergone a change following the enactment of the Disaster Management Act, 2005. The definition of disaster is now all encompassing, which includes not only the events emanating from natural and man-made causes, but even those events which are caused by accident or negligence. There was a long felt need to capture information about all such events occurring across the sectors and efforts made to mitigate them in the country and to collate them at one place in a global perspective. This book has been an effort towards realising this thought. This book in the present format is the outcome of the in-house compilation and analysis of information relating to disasters and their management gathered from different sources (domestic as well as the UN and other such agencies). All the three Directors in the Disaster Management Division, namely Shri J.P. Misra, Shri Dev Kumar and Shri Sanjay Agarwal have contributed inputs to this Book relating to their sectors. Support extended by Prof. Santosh Kumar, Shri R.K. Mall, former faculty and Shri Arun Sahdeo from NIDM have been very valuable in preparing an overview of the book. This book would have been impossible without the active support, suggestions and inputs of Dr. J. Radhakrishnan, Assistant Country Director (DM Unit), UNDP, New Delhi and the members of the UNDP Disaster Management Team including Shri Arvind Sinha, Consultant, UNDP.
    [Show full text]
  • Ab Klaipėdos Nafta Interim Condensed Consolidated
    AB KLAIPĖDOS NAFTA INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PREPARED ACCORDING TO INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, AS ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD ENDED 30 JUNE 2020 (UNAUDITED) CONTENT Statement of financial position ......................................................................................................................................................... 3-4 Statement of comprehensive income ............................................................................................................................................ 5-6 Statement of changes in equity ........................................................................................................................................................ 7-8 Cash flow statement ........................................................................................................................................................................... 9-10 Explanatory notes to financial statements ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Confirmation of responsible persons ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Consolidated interim report for the year 2020…………………………………………………………………………………………………26 AB KLAIPEDOS NAFTA CONSOLIDATED AND SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS PERIOD ENDED ON 30 JUNE
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements on Stationary Source Emissions and Assessing Impact on Ambient Air Quality Around Two Indian Refineries
    Open Access Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 73-87, June 2019 doi: https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2019.13.2.073 ISSN (Online) 2287-1160, ISSN (Print) 1976-6912 Research Article Measurements on Stationary Source Emissions and Assessing Impact on Ambient Air Quality around Two Indian Refineries Deepanjan Majumdar*, Anil Bhanarkar1), Ashok Gangadhar Gavane1), Chalapati Rao1) ABSTRACT Emissions of particulate matter (PM), SO2 and NO2 from stationary sources Kolkata Zonal Centre, CSIR-National and their concentration along with benzene and CO in ambient air around two Indian Environmental Engineering Research refineries were studied. Prediction of ground level concentration (GLC) of SO2, NO2 and Institute (CSIR-NEERI), i-8, Sector C, -3 EKDP, EM Bypass, Kolkata -700107, India PM was made by dispersion modeling. In Refinery 1, highest SO2 emission (646 mg Nm ) 1) Air Pollution Control Division, were detected in Sulphur Recovery Unit while NOx emissions ranged from 57.8 to 445.0 -3 CSIR-National Environmental mg Nm , respectively from various units. In Refinery 2, highest SO2 emission (935 mg Engineering Research Institute -3 Nm ) was observed from Utility Boiler while NO2 emissions ranged from 13 to 235 mg (CSIR-NEERI), Nehru Marg, -3 Nagpur - 440 020, India Nm . Above emissions were within the stipulated emission standards prescribed by Cen- tral Pollution Control Board of India. Further, ambient concentrations of the above in the *Corresponding author. vicinity of these refineries were below their prescribed national ambient air quality stan- Tel: +91-33-24421988 E-mail: [email protected] dards. Air quality in terms of air quality index (AQI) was moderate or good at the study sites.
    [Show full text]
  • The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task
    The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010 Industry Sector Task DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Issue 1 May 2010 DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task Restricted – Commercial AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Title The DA GHGI Improvement Programme 2009-2010: Industry Sector Task Customer DECC, The Scottish Government, The Welsh Assembly Government and the Northern Ireland Department of the Environment Customer reference NAEI Framework Agreement/DA GHGI Improvement Programme Confidentiality, Crown Copyright copyright and reproduction File reference 45322/2008/CD6774/GT Reference number AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 /Issue 1 AEA Group 329 Harwell Didcot Oxfordshire OX11 0QJ Tel.: 0870 190 6584 AEA is a business name of AEA Technology plc AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Authors Name Stuart Sneddon and Glen Thistlethwaite Approved by Name Neil Passant Signature Date 20th May 2010 ii AEA Restricted – Commercial DA GHGI Improvements 2009-2010: Industry Task AEAT/ENV/R/2990_3 Executive Summary This research has been commissioned under the UK and DA GHG inventory improvement programme, and aims to research emissions data for a group of source sectors and specific sites where uncertainties have been identified in the scope and accuracy of available source data. Primarily this research aims to review site-specific data and regulatory information, to resolve differences between GHG data reported across different emission reporting mechanisms. The research has comprised: 1) Data review from different reporting mechanisms (IPPC, EU ETS and EEMS) to identify priority sites (primarily oil & gas terminals, refineries and petrochemicals), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis Report
    MEGA DISASTER IN A RESILIENT SOCIETY The Great East Japan (Tohoku Kanto) Earthquake and Tsunami of 11th March 2011 SYNTHESIS AND INITIAL OBSERVATIONS International Environment and Disaster Management Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies Kyoto University 25th March 2011 About this Report This report is published on 25th of March 2011, two weeks after the Great East Japan [Tohoku-Kanto] Earthquake and Tsunami. The aim of the report is to synthesize certain existing data with basic situation analysis. The disaster has posed a major challenge to the disaster risk reduction community, which needs to be discussed in future over the course of time. Assistance of Yukiko Takeuchi for providing information, and Kumiko Fujita and Yuta suda in translating parts of the Japanese information is acknowledged. Team Members (Kyoto University) Sunil Parashar Noralene Uy Huy Nguyen Glenn Fernandez Farah Mulyasari Jonas Joerin Rajib Shaw Contact Details Rajib Shaw Associate Professor International Environment and Disaster Management Laboratory, KYOTO UNIVERSITY Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan Tel/Fax: 81-75-753-5708 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.iedm.ges.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are the views of the team members and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the research field for International Environment & Disaster Management (IEDM) or the Graduate School of Global Environment Studies (GSGES), or Kyoto University, or the organizations, or the countries cited. The report is a compilation from available sources, which are acknowledged. IEDM does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this volume and accept no responsibility for any consequences of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • A Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster
    Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – a Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT July 2016 A CHATHAM HOUSE RULE MEETING REPORT Delivering Cost Effective CCS in the 2020s – Yorkshire/Humber/Teesside Cluster A group consisting of private sector companies, public sector bodies, and leading UK academics has been brought together by the UKCCSRC to identify and address actions that need to be taken in order to deliver a CCS based decarbonisation option for the UK in line with recommendations made by the Committee on Climate Change (i.e. 4-7GW of power CCS plus ~3MtCO2/yr of industry CCS by 2030). At an initial meeting (see https://ukccsrc.ac.uk/about/delivering-cost-effective-ccs-2020s-new-start) it was agreed that a series of regionally focussed meetings should take place, and Yorkshire Humber (which also naturally extended to possible links with Teesside) was the first such region to be addressed. Conclusions Reached No. Conclusion Conclusion 1.1 The existence within Yorkshire Humber of a number of brownfield locations with existing infrastructure and planning consents means that the region remains a likely UK CCS cluster region. Conclusion 1.2 Demise of coal fired power plants in the Aire Valley will see the loss of coal handling infrastructure and new handling facilities would need to be developed for biomass-based projects Conclusion 2.1 For Yorkshire Humber it is the choice of storage location that determines whether any pipeline infrastructure would route primarily north or south of the Humber. Conclusion 2.2 For Yorkshire Humber (and Teesside) there exist only 3 beach crossing points and two viable shipping locations for export of CO2 offshore (or for import, for transfer to storage).
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    Operator Name Location Name Address Name Address Street Address Town Address County Address Postcode 1 Address Postcode 2 Incumbent Duty Type Text Previous Name LA Code Local Authority Country AMG Superalloys UK Limited Rotherham Fullerton Road Rotherham South Yorkshire S60 1DL COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was London & Scandinavian Metallurgical Co Ltd) 4415 Rotherham England Anglian Water Services Limited Wing Water Treatment Works Morcott Road Oakham Rutland LE15 8SA COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2470 Rutland UA England Arch Timber Protection Limited Huddersfield Huddersfield Works Leeds Road Huddersfield West Yorkshire HD2 1YU COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Arch UK Biocides Ltd) 4715 Kirklees England Argenta Dundee Limited Dundee Dunsinane Industrial Estate Kinnoull Road Dundee Angus DD2 3XR COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Vericore Limited) 9059 Dundee UA Scotland Associated British Ports Immingham Dock Immingham Dock Immingham Lincolnshire DN40 2NS COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Associated Petroleum Terminals (Immingham) Limited Immingham Main Terminal Queens Road Immingham North East Lincolnshire DN40 2PN COMAH Upper Tier Operator 2002 North East Lincolnshire England Avanti Gas Limited Ellesmere Port Britannia Road Ellesmere Port Cheshire CH65 4HB COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was Shell Gas Limited) 4325 Wirral England Avara Avlon Pharma Services Limited Avlon Works Severn Road Bristol South Gloucestershire BS10 7ZE COMAH Upper Tier Operator (was AstraZeneca UK Limited) 0119 South Gloucs UA England BAE Systems
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Ethanol on Vapor Pressure of Refinery Components and Commercial Type Gasoline Blends
    IOSR Journal of Applied Chemistry (IOSR-JAC) e-ISSN: 2278-5736.Volume 10, Issue 12 Ver. I (December. 2017), PP 19-28 www.iosrjournals.org Influence of Ethanol on Vapor Pressure of Refinery Components and Commercial Type Gasoline Blends D. Chilari1, D. Karonis1 * 1(School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Greece) Corresponding Author: D. Chilari1 Abstract: European member states have to comply with the Directive 2009/30/EC, which mandates the use of biofuels in motor fuels. Bioethanol is one of the possible renewable fuels that can be used. However, in Mediterranean member states with higher climate temperatures during summer, the production of gasoline with bioethanol as an oxygenate blending component will face increased volatility problems. This study examines the impact of ethanol addition (from 0.5 to 10% v/v) on vapor pressure of refinery streams used for gasoline blends and on commercial motor gasoline fuels. The addition of ethanol in small proportions increased the vapor pressure of the final gasolines tested. The change in vapor pressure was measured (expressed) using delta VP – ΔRVP. The ΔRVP was calculated in each blending component, in an attempt to identify the impact of the refinery stream composition on the change of vapor pressure due to the ethanol addition. The more volatile winter grade samples showed a lower increase in delta vapor pressure compared to the less volatile summer grade fuels. Thus, the addition of ethanol up to 5% v/v into gasoline led to increased vapor pressure of blends. Samples with higher content in olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons had higher increase in the vapor pressure.
    [Show full text]