Occupy Oakland and the Evolution of State Power By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Occupy Oakland and the Evolution of State Power By The Pre-emption of Resistance: Occupy Oakland and the Evolution of State Power By Laleh Behbehanian A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Michael B. Burawoy, Chair Professor Raka Ray Professor Cihan Z. Tugal Professor Michael J. Watts Summer 2016 The Pre-emption of Resistance: Occupy Oakland and the Evolution of State Power Copyright 2016 by Laleh Behbehanian Abstract The Pre-emption of Resistance: Occupy Oakland and the Evolution of State Power by Laleh Behbehanian Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology University of California, Berkeley Professor Michael B. Burawoy, Chair This dissertation aims to contribute to our understanding of the contemporary state strategies that target social movements by examining the case of Occupy Oakland. Emphasizing how state strategies, both tactical and discursive, dynamically evolve through their iterative relation to movement strategies, it presents a detailed empirical account that is disaggregated into three “moments”, each of which are characterized by the predominance of a distinct state strategic repertoire. The objective is to highlight an underlying transformation through which state’s strategies evolve from being highly reactive, indiscriminate and vulnerable to spectacularization to becoming increasingly pre-emptive, targeted and discursively buttressed. The first “moment” commences with the movement’s occupation of Oscar Grant Plaza. Faced with Occupy Oakland’s highly disruptive tactics and its firm rejection of any forms of negotiation or cooperation with City officials, the state resorts to a strategy of Naked Coercion (reactive, indiscriminate violence that is highly vulnerable to spectacularization) which backfires and results in an internationally televised disaster on the evening of October 25th. This creates an extraordinary window of opportunity for the movement, dramatically increasing public support and enabling it to undertake the first general strike in the U.S. since 1946. This fuels a process of adaptation as the struggle proceeds into the second “moment”, and the state shifts to a strategy of Targeted Repression that is increasingly pro-active, targeted and discursively buttressed so as to diminish the danger of its spectacularization. The new strategy succeeds in permanently dislodging the occupation of Oscar Grant Plaza, as well as criminalizing the tactic of occupation and excising it from movement’s repertoire. Still unsatisfied with the repression it had achieved, in the third and final “moment” the state introduces a strategy of Pre-emptive Neutralization that is pre-emptively oriented, targeted at high “risk” populations and discursively buttressed by powerful spectacles of “risk”. This enables a thorough incapacitation of the movement – fully neutralizing its potential for collective action by rendering Occupiers a target population that could no longer even publicly assemble without inciting highly militarized police responses that were now pre-emptively justified by the risk of “violence” they collectively posed. 1 For my mother, Kali, and all those who seek to occupy a better world… i The Pre-emption of Resistance: Occupy Oakland & the Evolution of State Power Preface: WHAT IS AT STAKE? vii Introduction: THE “VIOLENCE” OF RESISTANCE 1 - The Spectacular Backlash of Repression - The Spectacle of Occupier “Violence” - Occupy Oakland’s Diversion from “Nonviolence” - The Statist Accusation of “Violence” - The Boogeyman of “the Black Bloc” - A (Re)Vision of “Nonviolence” - Strategies of “Nonviolence”: Non-Provocation or Gandhian Spectacularization Chapter 1: THE EVOLUTION OF STATE POWER 20 - Conceptualizing “Political Repression”: Repertoires of Protest Policing - The Contemporary Repertoire of “Strategic Incapacitation” - Strategic Incapacitation: Targeted Pre-emption - The Strategy and Tactics of Targeted Pre-emption - Containing the Danger of Repressive Backlash - A Strategy of “Nonviolence” in the Era of Strategic Incapacitation - Approaching State Power Beyond the Confines of “Protest Policing” - The Case of Occupy Oakland: Mapping the Evolution of State Power Moment 1: Naked Coercion Moment 2: Targeted Repression Moment 3: Pre-emptive Neutralization Chapter 2: NAKED COERCION (“Holding Ground”) 37 - Occupy Oakland Strikes: The Occupation of Oscar Grant Plaza The Tactic of Occupation ii - The State’s Initial Strategy: Non-Enforcement and the “Balance” of First Amendment Protection - The Crisis of Soft Management: Occupy Oakland’s Tactical Repertoire Horizontalism Direct Action & Non-Cooperation with the State Provoking Open Confrontation with Police & Defending the Camp as a Police-Free Space - The Discursive Shift to Enforcement The “Balance” Tilts: “Public Safety,” “Small Business” and “Violence” “Lodging”: Disassociating Occupation from First Amendment Protection - The October 25th Raid - Occupy Oakland Strikes Back: Re-Occupation - State Strategy: Naked Coercion (“Holding Ground”) - The Spectacle of Naked Coercion - The Achilles Heel of Naked Coercion: The Spectacular (Mis)Targeting of Scott Olsen - Backlash: State Fragmentation and Paralysis - Occupy Oakland Strikes Again: The Political Opportunity of Spectacular Backlash The Second Encampment The November 2nd General Strike & Port Shutdown - The “Violence” of Nighttime “Agitators” and the Discursive Targeting of Police Force - Discourses of “Violence,” “Crime” and “Economic Decline” - “Lessons Learned”: Reconsolidating the State through “Reform” - The State’s New Strategy: A “Peaceful Eviction” – The November 14th Raid - From “Containment” to Targeted Regulation: The Constitution of the “Violent” Occupier - Conclusion: Dislodging the Encampment Chapter 3: TARGETED REPRESSION (“Violent Occupiers” vs. “Peaceful Protesters”) 97 - Occupy Oakland Strikes: The Tactical Adaptation of Occupation The Occupation Seeks a New Home State Strategy: Swift Enforcement against “Lodging” and “Trespassing” The “Vigilance” of Occupation: Tree Occupations, Guerilla Gardening and Mass Feedings State Strategy: The “Porta-Potty Raid” and the Targeting of Unpermitted “Structures” A New Model of Occupation: The “Vigil” Strategy iii - State Strategy: Enforcement Shifts to Targeting “Encroachment” - The Auxiliary Tactic of Permits and the Expanded Realm of Enforcement - Occupy Oakland Strikes Again: The December 12th West Coast Port Shutdown - State Strategy: The Tactic of Targeted Raids (“Violent Occupiers” vs. “Peaceful Protesters”) The December 16th Raid: The Pre-text of “Obstruction” and the Shift to Targeted Repression The December 30th Raid: Extralegal Detention and the De-spectacularization of State Violence The January 4th Raid: Surveillance Practices and the Terror of Targeted Repression - The Evolution of Targeted Repression: The Demise of the Occupation of Oscar Grant Plaza - Occupy Oakland Strikes Back: “Fuck the Police!” – Provoking Spectacles of Confrontation with OPD - State Strategy: Discursive Dominance and the New Dynamics of Spectacularization - Occupy Oakland Strikes Back: “Move-In Day” – OO’s Last Mass Occupation Effort - The State’s New Strategy: Incapacitation & Spectacularization Incapacitation through Tactics of Containment: Barricades, Kettles and “Less Lethals” Mass Arrests and the De-Spectacularization of State Violence The Spectacularization of Occupier “Violence” and the Criminalization of Occupation - Conclusion: (The) Occupation is Dead… Chapter 4: PRE-EMPTIVE NEUTRALIZATION (“Deterring Violence”) 159 - The State Strikes First: The Shift to Pre-emption - January 28th— The State’s Spectacular Window of Opportunity - City Council Strikes: “Deterrence” through “Zero Tolerance” Enforcement - “Civil Society” Strikes: The Spectacle of “Stand for Oakland” - The Prosecution Strikes: The District Attorney’s Office and the Prosecutorial Power of Pre-emption The Shift to Prosecutorial Tactics The Prosecutorial Spectacle of the “Move In-Day 12”: A “Violent Fringe” of “Outside Agitators” Stay Away Orders: The Delineation of a New Targeted “Risk” Population The Prosecutorial Spectacle of the “Ice Cream 3”: “Rioters” and “Hate Crimes” The Pre-emptive Power of the Prosecutor - The “Reform” of OPD and the Rise of Pre-emptive Policing - OO’s Last Strike: May Day and the Pre-emptive Neutralization of Occupy Oakland - Epilogue – City Council Strike Again: “Tools of Violence” and the Criminalization of Risk iv Conclusion: THE PARASITIC DYNAMISM OF STATE POWER & RESISTANCE 236 Notes 237 Bibliography 259 Appendix 1: Three Strategies of State Power 264 v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation is the product of an enormous collective effort. While I bear full responsibility for any shortcomings of this research, it is my community that deserves credit for its completion. While I may have been the one to sit and write this story, it belongs to the thousands of Occupiers who collectively made that history. I am enormously grateful to the countless comrades in Oakland with whom I occupied, and who have contributed in so many ways to this work. It is your courage, resilience, and unrelenting determination to struggle for a more just world that motivated and sustained this project. Long Live Occupy Oakland! In particular, this dissertation would not have been possible without my Anti-Repression Crew (the Bay Area Anti-Repression Committee). It is through our years of work together that I came to truly understand the meaning of solidarity. I am also immensely
Recommended publications
  • James Rowson Phd Thesis Politics and Putinism a Critical Examination
    Politics and Putinism: A Critical Examination of New Russian Drama James Rowson A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Royal Holloway, University of London Department of Drama, Theatre & Dance September 2017 1 Declaration of Authorship I James Rowson hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Abstract This thesis will contextualise and critically explore how New Drama (Novaya Drama) has been shaped by and adapted to the political, social, and cultural landscape under Putinism (from 2000). It draws on close analysis of a variety of plays written by a burgeoning collection of playwrights from across Russia, examining how this provocative and political artistic movement has emerged as one of the most vehement critics of the Putin regime. This study argues that the manifold New Drama repertoire addresses key facets of Putinism by performing suppressed and marginalised voices in public arenas. It contends that New Drama has challenged the established, normative discourses of Putinism presented in the Russian media and by Putin himself, and demonstrates how these productions have situated themselves in the context of the nascent opposition movement in Russia. By doing so, this thesis will offer a fresh perspective on how New Drama’s precarious engagement with Putinism provokes political debate in contemporary Russia, and challenges audience members to consider their own role in Putin’s autocracy. The first chapter surveys the theatrical and political landscape in Russia at the turn of the millennium, focusing on the political and historical contexts of New Drama in Russian theatre and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Winners Tab
    The Winners Tab 2013 BETTER NEWSPAPERS CONTEST AWARDS PRESENTATION: SATURDAY, MAY 3, 2014 CALIFORNIA NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION INSIDE ESTABLISHED 1888 2 General Excellence 5 Awards by Newspaper 6 Awards by Category 10 Campus Awards normally loquacious violinist is prone to becoming overwhelmed with emotion The Most Interesting Man in the Phil when discussing the physical, psychologi- How Vijay Gupta, a 26-Year-Old Former Med Student, cal and spiritual struggles of his non-Dis- Found Himself and Brought Classical Music to Skid Row ney Hall audience. “I’m this privileged musician,” he said recently. “Who the hell am I to think that I By Donna Evans could help anybody?” On a sweltering day in late August, raucous applause. Chasing Zubin Mehta Los Angeles Philharmonic violinist Vijay Screams of “Encore!” are heard. One Gupta will be front and center this week Gupta steps in front of a crowd and bows man, sitting amidst plastic bags of his when the Phil kicks off the celebration of his head to polite applause. belongings, belts out a curious request for the 10th anniversary of Walt Disney Con- He glances at the audience and surveys Ice Cube. Gupta and his fellow musicians, cert Hall. Along with the 105 other mem- the cellist and violist to his left . He takes Jacob Braun and Ben Ullery, smile widely bers of the orchestra, he’ll spend much of a breath, lift s his 2003 Krutz violin and and bow. the next nine months in formal clothes tucks it under his chin. Once it’s settled, Skid Row may seem an unlikely place and playing in front of affl uent crowds.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland, California
    AGENDA J. CHRISTOPHER LYTLE CESTRA BUTNER Executive Director PORT OF OAKLAND President ALAN S. YEE BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS First Vice-President DANNY WAN 530 Water Street 1 Oakland, California 94607 EARL HAMLIN Port Attorney (510) 627-1696(w)1(510) 839-5104(f)1TDD/TTY 711 Second Vice-President MICHAEL COLBRUNO ARNEL ATIENZA Commissioner Port Auditor E-Mail: [email protected] JAMES W. HEAD Website: www.portofoakland.com Commissioner JOHN T. BETTERTON BRYAN R. PARKER Secretary of the Board Commissioner AGENDA VICTOR UNO Commissioner Meeting of the Board of Port Commissioners December 12, 2013 – 1:00 p.m. Board Room – 2nd Floor ROLL CALL Commissioner Colbruno, Commissioner Head, Commissioner Parker, Commissioner Uno, 2nd Vice-President Hamlin, 1st Vice President Yee and President Butner. 1. CLOSED SESSION Closed Session discussions and materials may not be disclosed to a person not entitled to receive it, unless the Board authorizes disclosure of that confidential information. 1.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (2) of Subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 54956.9 4 Matters 1.2 CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS – (Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8): Property: Berths 25-26 Negotiating Parties: Port of Oakland and Ports America Outer Harbor Terminal Agency Negotiator: Executive Director, J. Christopher Lytle; Acting Director of Maritime, Jean Banker and Port Attorney, Danny Wan Under Negotiation: Price and Terms
    [Show full text]
  • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
    December 20, 2012 San Francisco HQ Atlanta PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Chicago Dallas Property Identification: Edgewater Park Plaza 7700 Edgewater Drive Oakland, Alameda County, California 94621 Denver AEI Project No. 315265 Irvine Prepared for: Los Angeles CCIG 300 Frank Ogawa Plaza, Suite 340 Oakland, California 94612 Miami Prepared by: New York AEI Consultants 2500 Camino Diablo Walnut Creek, California 94597 (925) 746-6000 Phoenix Portland San Jose PROJECT SUMMARY Edgewater Park Plaza 7700 Edgewater Drive, Oakland, Alameda County, California Report Section No REC HREC BER Recommended Action Further Action 2.1 Current use of X subject property 2.2 Adjoining X property information 3.1 Historical X X Summary 4.0 Regulatory X X Agency Records Review 5.0 Regulatory X Database Records Review 6.3 Previous Reports X X 7.0 Site Inspection X and Reconnaissance 7.2.1 Asbestos- X X Containing Materials 7.2.2 Lead-Based Paint X X 7.2.3 Radon X 7.2.4 Lead in Drinking X Water 7.2.5 Mold X Project No. 315265 December 20, 2012 Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AEI Consultants (AEI) was retained by CCIG to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-05 and the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at 7700 Edgewater Drive in the City of Oakland, Alameda County, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.3 of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 79235 C. M
    OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. 79235 c. M. H'fdTY CLLlO; ', L INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMEMBER 7~~\ $C64L, Y AV> j2-iyg~ RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 72727 C.M.S., WHICH IMPLEMENTED THE CITY OF OAKLAND'S COMMUNITY POLICING POLICY, TO PROVIDE A STRUCTURED APPROACH TO COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT WHEREAS, the people of Oakland require that their municipal government provide police services in the manner calculated to best insure public safety; and WHEREAS, for the last two decades cities and police departments across the Untied States have adopted strategies to reduce reliance on 911-response policing and instead utilize approaches known as "Community Oriented Policing," "Problem Oriented Policing," or "Community Policing;" and WHEREAS, the experience of the police departments which have adopted community policing strategy demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach in both reducing crime levels and increasing public sense of safety; and WHEREAS, the Oakland Police Department has been a pioneer in the development and utilization of community policing strategies through such programs as Beat Health, Neighborhood Watch, and Home Alert; and assuming a leadership role in comparable efforts by the Oakland Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 1996 the City Council of the City of Oakland passed Resolution No. 72727 to implement the community policing program in the City of Oakland and this Resolution was subsequently amended by Resolution No. 73185 C.M.S on December 17, 1996 and by Resolution No. 73916 C.M.S. on November 4, 1997; and
    [Show full text]
  • Willie Nelson Talks Music Legends Same Producers As “300,” Is Just As Bloody but Not Documentary Highlights As Big of a Hit with Some Audiences
    WE’RE THERE WHEN YOU CAN’T BE NELSON from Page 1 TheWEDNESDAY | NOVEMBER Baylor 16, 2011 Lariatwww.baylorlariat.com SPORTS Page 5 NEWS Page 3 A&E Page 4 A sweet reunion Baylor green is gold It’s no secret Baylor and the San Diego State Aztecs An initiative by the sustainability Clint Eastwood’s “J. Edgar,” follows the met Tuesday in the team’s first NIT department aims to make organization life of an FBI secret-keeper, from his semifinals together since 2009 meetings more environmentally friendly career highs to personal lows Vol. 112 No. 43 © 2011, Baylor University In Print >> 3-D flop “Immortals,” from the Willie Nelson talks music legends same producers as “300,” is just as bloody but not Documentary highlights as big of a hit with some audiences. Tommy Duncan’s career page 4 By Mandy Power Tommy Duncan fan club, with the Contributor idea for the documentary. “I had recently started work- >> An end in sight Willie Nelson is a famous ing at Baylor and thought this The Lariat Super League is musician in his own right, but would be a great opportunity for still going strong, with five the country star says his career my students to have a real-world teams coming close to the wouldn’t be the same without the experience,” Callaway said. playoffs this week. influence of old friend and west- The documentary highlights ern swing legend Tommy Dun- Duncan’s career as the lead singer can. for the band Bob Wills and the Page 5 Three students and a Baylor Texas Playboys.
    [Show full text]
  • First Amended Complaint Alleges As Follows
    Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations No. 20-CV-8924 (CM) (GWG) WOOD FIRST AMENDED This filing is related to: CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself JURY DEMAND and all others similarly situated, v. City of New York et al., No. 20-CV-10541 Plaintiff Charles Henry Wood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, for his First Amended Complaint alleges as follows: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1.! When peaceful protesters took to the streets of New York City after the murder of George Floyd in the summer of 2020, the NYPD sought to suppress the protests with an organized campaign of police brutality. 2.! A peaceful protest in Mott Haven on June 4, 2020 stands as one of the most egregious examples of the NYPD’s excessive response. 3.! It also illustrates the direct responsibility that the leaders of the City and the NYPD bear for the NYPD’s conduct. 4.! Before curfew went into effect for the evening, police in riot gear surrounded peaceful protesters and did not give them an opportunity to disperse. 5.! The police then charged the protesters without warning; attacked them indiscriminately with shoves, blows, and baton strikes; handcuffed them with extremely tight plastic zip ties; and detained them overnight in crowded and unsanitary conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1 Case 1:20-cv-10541-CM Document 48 Filed 03/05/21 Page 2 of 30 6.! The NYPD’s highest-ranking uniformed officer, Chief of Department Terence Monahan, was present at the protest and personally oversaw and directed the NYPD’s response.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oakland
    CITY OF OAKLAND Memorandum TO: Bureau of Field Operations ATTN: Deputy Chief Dave Downing FROM: Captain Darren Allison DATE: 31 Oct 13 RE: After Action Report for Crowd Control Operation on 25 Oct 13 Date of Operation 25 Oct 13 Time Period 0900-1700 and 1700-2200 Location of Event 1001 Broadway (Maniott Hotel) and Frank Ogawa Plaza Name of Event Facing Urban Shield and Occupy Oakland 2nd Commemoration of 25 Oct 11 Name of Operation Occupy Oakland Operation Incident Number 958 Report Number(s) 13-054595/13-054714 Incident Commander DC Downing Background Information What information and/or incident(s) occuned which caused the event and/or operation? How many subjects or protesters were expected? Situation General: On 25-28 Oct 13, the Alameda County Sheriffs Office hosted the 2013 Urban Shield. As stated on the 2013 Urban Shield website (https:llwww.urbanshield.org/): "Urban Shield [is] ... a comprehensive, full-scale regional preparedness exercise assessing the overall Bay Area UASI Region's response capabilities related to multi-discipline planning, policies, procedures, organization, equipment and training. Urban Shield continues to test regional integrated systems for prevention, protection, response and recovery in om high-tlu'eat, high-density urban area. The exercise evaluates our existing level of preparedness and capabilities, identifying not only what we do well, but areas in need of improvement." Vendors and first responders from all over the Country participated in the event. The Urban Shield event commenced with a trade show and seminar on 25 Oct 13 at the Marriott Hotel (l 00 1 Broadway). On 25 Oct 13, protestors affiliated with the "Facing Urban Shield Action Network" (hUp:llfacingteargas.org/facing-urban-shield-action-network) held a demonstration at 11 th st.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrol Guide § 212-72
    EXHIBIT K AOR307 An Investigation of NYPD’s Compliance with Rules Governing Investigations of Political Activity New York City Department of Investigation Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD (OIG-NYPD) Mark G. Peters Commissioner Philip K. Eure Inspector General for the NYPD August 23, 2016 AOR308 AN INVESTIGATION OF NYPD’S COMPLIANCE WITH RULES GOVERNING AUGUST 2016 INVESTIGATIONS OF POLITICAL ACTIVITY Table of Contents Overview ............................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 I. NYPD Investigations of Political Activity: Handschu and Patrol Guide § 212-72 ....... 11 II. OIG-NYPD Investigation .............................................................................................. 12 Methodology and Access ..................................................................................................... 13 I. Treatment of Sensitive Information ............................................................................ 13 II. Compliance Criteria ..................................................................................................... 13 III. Scope and Sampling .................................................................................................... 14
    [Show full text]
  • Council Discussion and Action on How to Accommodate A
    Council discussion and action on how to accommodate a long term Occupy Wall Street camp in Oakland with consideration of a Resolution expressing support of an Occupy Wall Street Protest Movement and the People’s Rights to Peaceful Assembly in Oakland, and Council discussion on the use of force and our policy/protocols for use of less lethal weapons by mutual aid agencies Resolution Resolution Supporting the Occupy Wall Street Protest Movement and Urging Mayor Quan to Uphold People’s Right to Peaceful Assembly and Collaborate with Occupy Oakland to Ensure Safety of the Protestors, their Supporters, and the Greater Public. WHEREAS, "Occupy Wall Street" was formed by a broad spectrum of people coming together to protest the corporate-serving economic and political system controlled by the 1 percent, profiting at the expense of 99 percent of the people; and WHEREAS, Three years after the current financial crisis caused by Wall Street speculators and profiteers, the unemployment rate in the United States is still at the highest level since the Great Depression with the unemployment rate in Oakland reaching double digits; and, WHEREAS, The United States’ major banking institutions, which have been bailed-out by the government and United States taxpayers, have done little to prevent massive foreclosure of residential properties or support the revitalization of local economies by sustaining small businesses; and, WHEREAS, Since 2008, there have been 1.2 million foreclosures in California, with 10,000 completed foreclosures in Oakland alone since
    [Show full text]
  • History&Perspectives
    2012 CHINESE AMERICA History&Perspectives THE JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA CHINESE AMERICA HISTORY & PERSPECTIVES The Journal of the Chinese Historical Society of America 2012 CHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA Chinese America: History & Perspectives — The Journal of the Chinese Historical Society of America Chinese Historical Society of America Museum & Learning Center 965 Clay Street San Francisco, California 94108 chsa.org Copyright © 2012 Chinese Historical Society of America. All rights reserved. Copyright of individual articles remains with the author(s). ISBN-13: 978-1-885864-47-5 ISBN-10: 1-885864-47-7 Design by Side By Side Studios, San Francisco. Permission is granted for reproducing up to fifty copies of any one article for Educa- tional Use as defined by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. To order additional copies or inquire about large-order discounts, see order form at back or email [email protected]. Articles appearing in this journal are indexed in Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life. About the cover image: Lum Ngow with his parents in China, 1925. Photo courtesy of Lee Show Nam. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents THINGS MATTER Chinese American Culture Work and the Gods of Marysville 1 Jonathan H. X. Lee and Vivian-Lee Nyitray LIFE IN A CHINATOWN COLD WATER TENEMENT BUILDING 7 Lyle Jan HISTORY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE IN CALIFORNIA A Perspective through the Stories of Four Acupuncturists 11 Emily S. Wu “We WERE REAL, SO THERE waS NO NEED TO BE AFRAID” Lum Ngow’s Long Detention on Angel Island 19 Judy Yung THE TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY CHINESE AMERICA Growth and Diversity 27 Wei Li and Wan Yu About the Contributors 33 About the Editorial Committee 35 Guidelines for Manuscript Submission 37 Chinese Historical Society of America Membership Form 39 iii Things Matter Chinese American Culture Work and the Gods of Marysville Jonathan H.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of OAKLAND PUBLIC ETHICS COMMISSION One Frank Ogawa Plaza (City Hall) Special Commission Meeting Monday, July 31, 2017 Hearing Room 1 6:30 P.M
    CITY OF OAKLAND PUBLIC ETHICS COMMISSION One Frank Ogawa Plaza (City Hall) Special Commission Meeting Monday, July 31, 2017 Hearing Room 1 6:30 p.m. Commissioners: Marc Pilotin (Chair), Krisida Nishioka (Vice-Chair), Lisa Crowfoot, Dana King, Gail Kong, Jodie Smith, and Jonathan Stein Commission Staff: Whitney Barazoto, Executive Director; Milad Dalju, Deputy Director and Chief of Enforcement; Suzanne Doran, Lead Analyst – Civic Technology and Engagement; Jelani Killings, Ethics Analyst; Ana Lara-Franco, Commission Assistant; Simon Russell, Investigator City Attorney Staff: Trish Hynes, Deputy City Attorney SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 1. Roll Call and Determination of Quorum. 2. Staff and Commission Announcements. 3. Open Forum. CONSENT ITEMS1 4. Approval of Commission Meeting Draft Minutes. a. June 5, 2017, Regular Meeting Minutes (Attachment 1 – Minutes) ACTION ITEMS 5. In the Matter of Lynette Gibson McElhaney (Case No. 15-07). Staff presents a report summarizing evidence that Councilmember Lynette Gibson McElhaney committed the following violations of the Oakland Government Ethics Act: 1) solicited and accepted gifts valued at more than $50 from a source she knew, or had reason to know, was a restricted source, in violation of Section 2.25.060(C) of the Oakland Government Ethics Act; 2) made a governmental decision in which she had a disqualifying financial interest in violation of Section 2.25.040(A) of the Oakland Government Ethics Act, and; 3) failed to disclose the gifts she received from the restricted source on her annual statement of economic interests in violation of Section 2.25.040(B) of the Oakland Government Ethics Act. Staff recommends that the Commission refer this matter to an administrative hearing before a single Commissioner.
    [Show full text]