DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconstructing Gabriel Tarde's Criminal Sociology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconstructing Gabriel Tarde's Criminal Sociology Article History of the Human Sciences 2014, Vol. 27(2) 60–74 Crime as social excess: ª The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permission: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Reconstructing Gabriel DOI: 10.1177/0952695114525167 Tarde’s criminal sociology hhs.sagepub.com Sergio Tonkonoff National Council of Scientific and Technological Research, Argentina Abstract Gabriel Tarde, along with Durkheim and others, set the foundations for what is today a common-sense statement in social science: crime is a social phenomenon. However, the questions about what social is and what kind of social phenomenon crime is remain alive. Tarde’s writings have answers for both of these capital and interdependent problems and serve to renew our view of them. The aim of this article is to reconstruct Tarde’s def- inition of crime in terms of genus and specific difference, exploring his criminology as a case of his general sociology. This procedure shows that Tarde succeeded in creating a comprehensive theory of crime and criminals founded not only on his most well-known concept, imitation, but also on his equally important concepts of invention, opposition, social logic and social teleology. For Tarde, crime is a complex phenomenon related to criminal inventions, criminal propagations, the production of penal laws, the execution of controls and punishments, and the collective reactions to all these. Keywords crime, imitation, invention, opposition, Gabriel Tarde By the late 19th century, various specters haunted Europe and America, creating prob- lems for both the social order and theoretical reflection. Crime was among the most important. The very foundations that sustained the modern penal codes and strongly sup- ported the opinions and decisions of experts and lay people alike were seriously called into question. Lawyers, doctors, psychiatrists, penitentiary experts, even philosophers, began to challenge the legitimacy and efficacy of a penal system based on a notion of Corresponding author: Sergio Tonkonoff, National Council of Scientific and Technological Research, Sociology, Av. Rivadavia 1917, Buenos Aires 1033, Argentina. Email: [email protected] Tonkonoff 61 free will. Despite great differences between them, all agreed on the necessity of reforming the precepts, methods and aims of penal institutions. This meant establishing a scientific understanding of the causes of the criminal phenomenon as groundwork of any and all reform (Nye, 1984). Regardless of the changes to penal systems that this would effectively provoke, it is important to note that this paradigmatic crisis, and the efforts to reframe the forms of knowledge and action in the criminal field, were an essen- tial part of the historical circumstances from which different scientific discourses on crime in particular and society in general arose (Foucault, 1979, 1999). In other words, it is necessary to make explicit that, at least in France, the foundation of social sciences was strongly linked to the very battles for social order that the criminal question involves. Yet despite this birthmark, one cannot lose sight of the diversity of theoretical positions that existed then, nor of the possibility of isolating some among them for contemporary re-evaluation and application. This seems particularly true in the case of Gabriel Tarde, a provincial aristocrat and Roman Catholic magistrate whose interven- tions in some political and cultural polemics of his time suggested a conservative slant (Mucchielli, 2000). This slant (his misogyny, for example), in addition to his identifica- tion as champion of the ‘psychologist party’ by the Durkheimian school (Bougle´, 1905), perhaps serves to explain why Tarde became a long-forgotten classic. Now, however, his works are being republished, a growing number of papers cite him, and we see more theoretical and even empirical researches drawing on his sociology (e.g. Candea, 2010; Latour, 2005; Borch, 2005; Lazzaratto, 2002; Deleuze, 1994). These researches find valuable tools there for conceiving of the social realm as inevitably open and dynamic. This is because what are important to Tarde are not the finished social structures but their generative networks. Tarde’s metaphors are not so much mechanical or biological as they are hydraulic, astronomical and energetic. He asserts that all social structure hides within it a constellation of beliefs and desires, which are open to other equally open social structures. In his sociology, the diverse currents of faith and passion are the materials that configure – as well as exceed and transform – institutions, groups and individuals. It remains to be seen whether his criminology can still challenge us, and whether it is worth being part of the contemporary rescue of his work. To do so, we first must reconstruct it both conceptually and contextually. This article intends to contribute to this task by bringing to light and articulating overlooked aspects of the criminological perspective that Tarde produced throughout this prolific intellectual life. In doing this, I will attempt to address a significant gap in most, if not all, methodical or incidental commentaries on his sociology of crime. The few but important existing works on this matter, indicate how Tarde’s publications and interventions have encouraged a sociolo- gical comprehension of crime in opposition to the biological and utilitarian positions (Vine, 1973; Nye, 1984; Vold and Bernard, 1986; Jones, 1986; Beirne, 1987, 1993; Toth, 1997). Nevertheless, when describing and analysing the theoretical structure of the Tardean criminology, they focused exclusively on the concept of imitation. This is, certainly, a key concept. The arguments of Criminalite´ Compare´e [Comparative Crim- inology] (1886) and La Philosophie Pe´nale [Penal Philosophy] (1890) are basically organized around it. In those books, written in the heat of the mentioned polemics, Tarde sought to demonstrate that crime has an entirely social nature. Since for him society is, in 62 History of the Human Sciences 27(2) the first place, imitativeness, and crime is a branch of the social tree, then it must neces- sarily be an imitative phenomenon. But if crime is a social phenomenon like industry, art, or philosophy, then a major theoretical problem arises: What differentiates it from other phenomena of this genre? The difficulty here is that the answer to this is not immediately available in Tarde’s writings. He never fully systematizes its abundant criminological developments (not even in his late article ‘Qu’est-ce que le crime?’ [What is Crime?] [1898b]). However, I believe that it can be done, and this is the major aim of this article. For that, the strategy I have chosen is more systematic than historical – although some references to context are unavoidable. I have tried to identify the main elements of this criminal sociology and articulate them in a coherent framework. That is, I have tried to (re)construct its syntax and its vocabulary. In this way I have found that it includes not only the much-discussed concept of imitation but the other equally important concepts of invention, opposition, social teleology and social logic. Articulating them, it is possible to provide a Tardean definition of crime in terms of genus and specific difference. Sociology and society Tarde succeeded in formulating an original sociological theory, and his criminal sociol- ogy depends on these major theoretical developments, at the same time that it stimulates them (Gurtvich, 1942). Thus, in order to understand his criminology, it is essential to establish the main features of his general sociology. In Tarde’s view, society is, first and foremost, the outcome – unstable and temporary – of social life. This does not mean, however, that he sees the individual as the irredu- cible basis of social life. Rather, the individual is likewise an outcome – and also, in a certain sense, unstable and temporary. For Tarde, ‘heterogeneity, not homogeneity, is at the heart of things’ (1903: 71). As regards the individual, this means that one is born equal neither to others nor to oneself, but becomes similar over time. And the same applies to society. It is primarily established by affective and evaluative bonds, but here the coincidence of convictions and passions in a large number of individuals does not refer to organic inheritance or to a natural law contract. Nor does it refer to the social fact as Durkheim understood it (coercive and external to individuals): ‘I argue that the thorough conformity of the spirits and wills that constitute the foundation of social life, even in more turbulent times, this simultaneous presence of many precise ideas, many aims and means in all the spirits and all the wills, is the effect ... of suggestion-imita- tion’ (ibid.: 75). Imitation is a key notion in this sociology, as the way that this ‘becoming similar’ takes place is linked to the elemental social action of repeating an example. Here the language, the nation, the economic market and the government are nothing but imitative networks. And, as we shall see, the same can be said of the practices of fraud, robbery and murder. But in no case is the individual the final cause of these phenomena. Accord- ing to Tarde, the imitable and the imitated are not so much a person as the beliefs and desires that a person bears or produces – whether she or he wants to or not, whether consciously or otherwise. Where, then, do these imitated beliefs and desires come from? The answer is in the concept of invention. Tarde (1902: 563) understands that all forms Tonkonoff 63 of doing, feeling, or thinking spring from an invention and have the tendency to propa- gate as fashion and take root as custom. All invention is individual, but once again, the individual is not its source: what is new happens in an individual, but she is not exactly its origin. The individual is a place of passage and sedimentation of collective desires and beliefs that repeat themselves in the form of judgments, will, memory and habits.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paradigm 37 Notes
    Notes for The Science of Passionate Interests: An Introduction to Gabriel Tarde’s Economic Anthropology , by Bruno Latour and Vincent Antonin Lepinay, Prickly Paradigm Press, 2009. P4 Line 6 : cost : Accessible at http://classiques.uqac.ca/ ; and more specifically, for Tarde’s text at http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/tarde_gabriel/psycho_economique_t1/psycho_eco _t1.html ;. Line 15 : importance : Our selection of passages is found on the website http://www.bruno-latour.fr/ . P5 Line 13 : economics : Only one book to our knowledge tried to show the importance of that of Tarde: Maurizio Lazzarato (2002) Puissances de l'invention : La Psychologie économique de Gabriel Tarde contre l'économie politique , Paris : Les Empêcheurs. For a deeper analysis of the influence of Tarde on Deleuze, one must refer to this work. Let us note that Clark translated several pages of Psychologie économique in his work in English: T. N. Clark (1969) Gabriel Tarde On communication and Social Influence. Selected Papers, Edited by Terry N. Clark, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. A whole issue of the publication Economy and Society was recently dedicated to Tarde and more specifically to the work in question. See the introduction by Barry, Andrew, and Nigel Thrift. 2007. « Gabriel Tarde: Imitation, Invention and Economics. » Economy and Society 36 (4):509-525. P8 First quotation : All page numbers, unless otherwise noted, are from the original version of Psychologie Economique as it appears on Gallica . All italics are the author’s. Line 22: subjectivities: As early as the article “La croyance et le désir” (“Belief and Desire”) which appeared in the Revue philosophique, a year before his first application to “La psychologie en économie politique” (“Psychology in Political Economy”) in the same journal (Volume XII, September 1881).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence Mae Kuykendall
    Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly Volume 42 Article 3 Number 4 Summer 2015 1-1-2015 Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence Mae Kuykendall Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Mae Kuykendall, Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence, 42 Hastings Const. L.Q. 695 (2015). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_constitutional_law_quaterly/vol42/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Evaluating the Sociology of First Amendment Silence by MAE KUYKENDALL* Introduction Silence is that curious answer to the riddle, "What is golden and disappears when you speak its name?" In the context of First Amendment jurisprudence, Silence is just as puzzling as a riddle. Silence may be used as a verb, as in, to cause a speaker to cease speaking or as a noun, as in, the absence of speaking or sound. In either form, Silence has long been recognized as a rhetorical vehicle for expression. As it is wont to do, Silence often sits quietly in the interstices of First Amendment doctrine. But when she speaks, she roars. When Silence becomes speech, and that speech becomes law, Silence can get a thumping for its unseemly intrusion. The thumping of silence as legal doctrine, such as it has been, was a product of the Court's rescue of the Boy Scouts in Boy Scouts of America v.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Punishment in Criminology: a Historical Review
    NURJAHAN KHATUN Philosophy of Punishment in Criminology:A Historical Review MOHAMMED JAHIRUL ISLAM SUBRATA BANARJEE MOUMITA PAUL Philosophy of Punishment in Criminology: A Historical Review NURJAHAN KHATUN MOHAMMED JAHIRUL ISLAM SUBRATA BANARJEE MOUMITA PAUL Abstract: From the dawn of human civilization, the existence of crime and punishment are acutely noticeable. Paradoxically, crime and punishment are interrelated termed with each other in contemporary criminology. The prime objective of the study is to identify the changing nature and forms of the philosophy of punishment from historical perspectives. Moreover, the study also tried to find out the associated factors, which contribute to the philosophical change from ancient period to modern age. The review paper is based on secondary sources as well as historical documents like journal articles, authentic books. There are three basic eras perceptible in accordance with the historical viewpoint which are pre classical, classical and modern having retributive, deterrent, rehabilitative and re-integrative philosophies of punishment respectively. The nature of punishment changed due to the impact of political movement especially the French Revolution, industrialization, advancement of science and technology, advent of law enforcing agencies viz., police, courts, and correction systems. Although, the modern philosophy of punishment is re-integrative and rehabilitative, but still punishment itself is a debatable issues from different points of view such as existentialism and postmodernism. Key words: Punishment; Philosophy of Punishment; Factors of Punishment; Deterrence. Authors: Nurjahan Khatun & Mohammed Jahirul Islam, Assistant Professors, Department of Criminology and Police Science, Mawlana Bhasani Science and Technology University, Santosh, Tangail-1902, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Mohammed Jahirul Islam, Lecturer, Department of Criminology and Police Science, Mawlana Bhasani Science and Technology University, Santosh, Tangail-1902, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
    [Show full text]
  • People's Power
    #2 May 2011 Special Issue PersPectives Political analysis and commentary from the Middle East PeoPle’s Power the arab world in revolt Published by the Heinrich Böll stiftung 2011 This work is licensed under the conditions of a Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/. You can download an electronic version online. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution - you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial - you may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works - you may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. editor-in-chief: Layla Al-Zubaidi editors: Doreen Khoury, Anbara Abu-Ayyash, Joachim Paul Layout: Catherine Coetzer, c2designs, Cédric Hofstetter translators: Mona Abu-Rayyan, Joumana Seikaly, Word Gym Ltd. cover photograph: Gwenael Piaser Printed by: www.coloursps.com Additional editing, print edition: Sonya Knox Opinions expressed in articles are those of their authors, and not HBS. heinrich böll Foundation – Middle east The Heinrich Böll Foundation, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation. Our foremost task is civic education in Germany and abroad with the aim of promoting informed democratic opinion, socio-political commitment and mutual understanding. In addition, the Heinrich Böll Foundation supports artistic, cultural and scholarly projects, as well as cooperation in the development field. The political values of ecology, democracy, gender democracy, solidarity and non-violence are our chief points of reference.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Wrong with the Sociology of Punishment?1
    1 What’s Wrong with the Sociology of Punishment?1 John Braithwaite Australian National University Abstract The sociology of punishment is seen through the work of David Garland, as contributing useful insights, but less than it might because of its focus on societal choices of whether and how to punish instead of on choices of whether to regulate by punishment or by a range of other important strategies. A problem in Garland’s genealogical method is that branches of the genealogy are sawn off – the branches where the chosen instruments of regulation decentre punishment. This blinds us to the hybridity of predominantly punitive regulation of crime in the streets that is reshaped by more risk- preventive and restorative technologies of regulation for crime in the suites, and vice versa. Such hybridity is illustrated by contrasting the regulation of pharmaceuticals with that of “narcotics” and by juxtaposing the approaches to a variety of business regulatory challenges. A four-act drama of Rudoph Guiliani’s career as a law enforcer - Wall Street prosecutor (I), “zero-tolerance” mayor (II), Mafia enforcement in New York (III), and Rudi the Rock of America’s stand against terrorism (IV) - is used to illustrate the significance of the hybridity we could be more open to seeing. Guiliani takes criminal enforcement models into business regulation and business regulatory models to street crime. The weakness of a genealogical approach to punishment can be covered by the strengths of a history of regulation that is methodologically committed to synoptically surveying all the important techniques of regulation deployed to control a specific problem (like drug abuse).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and the Myth of Consensus
    Essays Conservation and the Myth of Consensus M. NILS PETERSON,∗ MARKUS J. PETERSON,† AND TARLA RAI PETERSON‡ ∗Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824-1222, U.S.A., email [email protected] †Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2258, U.S.A. ‡Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0491, U.S.A. Abstract: Environmental policy makers are embracing consensus-based approaches to environmental de- cision making in an attempt to enhance public participation in conservation and facilitate the potentially incompatible goals of environmental protection and economic growth. Although such approaches may pro- duce positive results in immediate spatial and temporal contexts and under some forms of governance, their overuse has potentially dangerous implications for conservation within many democratic societies. We suggest that environmental decision making rooted in consensus theory leads to the dilution of socially powerful con- servation metaphors and legitimizes current power relationships rooted in unsustainable social constructions of reality. We also suggest an argumentative model of environmental decision making rooted in ecology will facilitate progressive environmental policy by placing the environmental agenda on firmer epistemological ground and legitimizing challenges to current power hegemonies that dictate unsustainable practices. Key Words: democracy, environmental conflict,
    [Show full text]
  • The Opposition to Israel's Withdrawal from the Gaza Strip: Legi
    1 ENGL 114 Professor Andrew Ehrgood The Opposition to Israel's Withdrawal from the Gaza Strip: Legitimizing Civil Disobedience from Both Sides of the Political Map by Aya Shoshan The Left Faces an Unexpected Dilemma As an Israeli leftist, I shared the left’s excitement when, in February 2004, Prime Minister Sharon announced his plan to withdraw from the Gaza strip. Even though this wasn't the peace agreement that the left craved for, no one could ignore the historical importance of this decision. The dominant view among the left was that after 38 years of occupation of Palestinian territories, Israel was finally acknowledging that the occupation was destructive. The withdrawal was also a precedent for evacuating other Israeli settlements. If the plan proved feasible, it would make way for other evacuations in the future. Finally, that the decision to withdraw had been made by a right-wing government meant that the understanding of the need to withdraw had crossed political boundaries and become a consensus. In the midst of this enthusiasm, disturbing voices of resistance appeared from the far right. Aside from expected protests against the withdrawal, some right-wing leaders and activists called for more severe steps, such as refusing to serve in the military and physically resisting the evacuation of settlements. These statements outraged the left. How dare the settlers, who have been nurtured by the state for years, who have taken pride in being patriotic and loyal to the state, who have dragged Israel into countless unnecessary confrontations with the Palestinians, how dare they turn their back on the law and the government now? There was an immense urge among the left to denounce the right resistance, and many left-wing activists and thinkers joined forces to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarde's Idea of Quantification
    Tarde’s idea of quantification Bruno Latour To cite this version: Bruno Latour. Tarde’s idea of quantification. Candea, Matei. The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments, Routledge, pp.145-162, 2010. hal-00973004 HAL Id: hal-00973004 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00973004 Submitted on 3 Apr 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Tarde’s idea of quantification * A chapter for Mattei Candea (editor) The Social After Gabriel Tarde: Debates and Assessments Bruno Latour, Sciences Po “[Thanks to statistics] public broadsheets will be to the social world what the sensory organs are to the organic world” (Lois de l’imitation). Numbers, numbers, numbers. Sociology has been obsessed by the goal of becoming a quantitative science. Yet it has never been able to reach this goal because of what it has defined as being quantifiable within the social domain. The work of Gabriel Tarde has been resurrected for many reasons. One of them, to be sure, is an acknowledgement of the diminishing returns of “social explanations”. In my view, however, it would be wrong to limit Tarde’s contribution to the theme of the “end of the social”.i If he has become so interesting, if he is read with such great avidity today, it is also because he engaged sociology, and more generally the human sciences —history, geography, archaeology, social psychology and above all economics— with a different definition of what it is for a discipline to be quantitative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laws of Imitation and Invention: Gabriel Tarde and the Evolutionary Economics of Innovation Faridah Djellal, Faïz Gallouj
    The laws of imitation and invention: Gabriel Tarde and the evolutionary economics of innovation Faridah Djellal, Faïz Gallouj To cite this version: Faridah Djellal, Faïz Gallouj. The laws of imitation and invention: Gabriel Tarde and the evolutionary economics of innovation. 2014. halshs-00960607 HAL Id: halshs-00960607 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00960607 Preprint submitted on 18 Mar 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 The laws of imitation and invention: Gabriel Tarde and the evolutionary economics of innovation Faridah Djellal and Faïz Gallouj Clersé, and University Lille 1 Abstract Gabriel Tarde was a French sociologist and criminologist whose work is rediscovered from time to time. Economists of innovation have paid insufficient attention to an author who devoted a large part of his work to the laws of imitation and invention. The purpose of this paper is threefold. The first is to give a succinct account of these laws of imitation and invention. The second is to re-examine and extend the debates on the similarities between Schumpeter and Tarde. The third and main purpose is to examine the similarities, hitherto unexplored to the best of our knowledge, between Tarde’s work and contemporary neo- Schumpteterian and evolutionary theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Café Com Sociologia
    Revista Café com Sociologia Volume 5, número 2, Mai./Agos. 2016 O CINEMA À PROVA DA OPINIÃO Heitor Benjamim Campos1 Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho é compreender a dinâmica da relação dos atores sociais com seus públicos na situação homem-cinema. Entendendo o gosto cinematográfico como um marcador de diferenças e identidades sociais, pretendo mostrar algumas experiências desse diálogo entre humanos e o cinema, problematizando as recorrências e contradições do seu consumo. Palavras-chave: Opinião. Públicos. Moralidades. Cinema. THE OPINION-PROFF CINEMA Abstract The objective of the paper is to understand the relation dynamics between the social actors and his public in a man-cinema situation. Understanding cinematic taste as a marker of difference and social identity, i intend to show some experiences about this dialogue between humans and cinema, problematising recurrences and contradictions of it’s consumption. Keywords: Opinion. Public. Morality. Cinema. Introdução André Bazin foi categórico ao mencionar o comportamento do público após a exibição do filme Le Mystère Picasso de Henri-Georges Clouzot: “os admiradores adoram ainda mais e os que não gostam de Picasso confirmam seu desprezo” (BAZIN, 1981, p. 178). E assim, o teórico francês vai tecendo sua crítica a partir dessas diferentes opiniões a respeito de uma mesma obra cinematográfica: de um lado, talvez os defensores de um realismo clássico da arte figurativa; e de 1 Doutorando em Sociologia Política pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sociologia Política da Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense (PPGSP/UENF), Mestre em Sociologia Política e graduado em Ciências Sociais pela Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF). E-mail: [email protected] V.5, n.
    [Show full text]
  • Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 11-1999 Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited Elihu Katz University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Katz, E. (1999). Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566 (1), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271629956600112 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/272 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited Abstract This article is a call for volunteers to stand on the shoulders of Gabriel Tarde and Pitirim Sorokin, who dared to theorize the process of diffusion over a wide variety of disciplines. While all of the social sciences and humanities regularly produce case studies of diffusion, theorizing seems paralyzed. This paralysis stems from the ostensible incommensurability of diffusing items; their refusal to hold still in transit; the complexity of their interactions with the cultures, social structures, and media systems in which potential adopters are embedded; the difficulty ofeconciling r voluntary action and external imposition; and the lack of a disciplinary home. Disciplines Communication | Social and Behavioral Sciences This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/272 Theorizing Diffusion: Tarde and Sorokin Revisited By ELIHU KATZ ABSTRACT: This article is a call for volunteers to stand on the shoulders of Gabriel Tarde and Pitirim Sorokin, who dared to theorize the process of diffusion over a wide variety of disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Virality : Contagion Theory in the Age of Networks / Tony D
    VIRALITY This page intentionally left blank VIRALITY TONY D. SAMPSON UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PRESS Minneapolis London Portions of chapters 1 and 3 were previously published as “Error-Contagion: Network Hypnosis and Collective Culpability,” in Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures, ed. Mark Nunes (New York: Continuum, 2011). Portions of chapters 4 and 5 were previously published as “Contagion Theory beyond the Microbe,” in C Theory: Journal of Theory, Technology, and Culture (January 2011), http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=675. Copyright 2012 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sampson, Tony D. Virality : contagion theory in the age of networks / Tony D. Sampson. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8166-7004-8 (hc : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-8166-7005-5 (pb : alk. paper) 1. Imitation. 2. Social interaction. 3. Crowds. 4. Tarde, Gabriel, 1843–1904. I. Title. BF357.S26 2012 302'.41—dc23 2012008201 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper The University of Minnesota is an equal-opportunity educator and employer. 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Dedicated to John Stanley Sampson (1960–1984) This page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]