DOCSLIB.ORG

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS (Raps 2, 3A, 3B, 4 & 5)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS (RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5) for the proposed North Western Components (RAP 2), North Eastern Components (RAP 3a), South Eastern Components (RAP 3b), Feeder Oil Pipeline Components (RAP 4), and Upgrade of Existing Access Roads (RAP 5) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by ATACAMA CONSULTING Plot 22B, Lower Naguru East Road, Naguru, Kampala, Uganda SEPTEMBER 2020 DOCUMENT CONTROL Tilenga Project Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5) for the proposed North Western Components (RAP 2), North Eastern Components Document Title: (RAP 3a), South Eastern Components (RAP 3b), Feeder Oil Pipeline Components (RAP 4), and Upgrade of Existing Access Roads (RAP 5): Executive Summary. Document ID/Reference SRS_CA1&LA2_TP_RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5_01 (ES) Number: Version Number: 01 Date of Version 16th September 2020 Number: Current Revision 01 Level: Client: Prepared by: ATACAMA CONSULTING DISCLAIMER: This report was commissioned on terms specifically limiting the liability of the authors. The authors have prepared this report with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the contract with the Project. Our conclusions are the results of the exercise of our professional judgment based in part upon materials and information provided by the Project and others. We disclaim any responsibility and liability to the Project and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the work. No part of this document may be reproduced without the prior written approval of the Project operators and the Government of Uganda. TILENGA PROJECT – RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page i Atacama Consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................ iv LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. OVERVIEW OF METHODOLOGY FOR RAP DEVELOPMENT ........................................................... 35 3. SOCIAL BASELINE ............................................................................................................................ 63 4. VULNERABLE PROJECT AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS ........................................................................ 84 5. KEY IMPACT FINDINGS .................................................................................................................... 90 6. CONCERNS AND GRIEVANCES ....................................................................................................... 100 7. ENTITLEMENT AND COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 105 8. RESETTLEMENT AND RELOCATION PACKAGES ............................................................................ 118 9. LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION .......................................................................................................... 135 10. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................... 146 11. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ................................................................................................. 157 12. RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 BUDGET AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE ........................................... 168 TILENGA PROJECT – RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page ii Atacama Consulting LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Joint Venture Partners Licence Areas ........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2: RAP 2 Project Area in the context of Lake Albert and Buliisa ................................................ 10 Figure 3: RAP 3a Project Area in the context of Lake Albert and Buliisa ............................................... 11 Figure 4: RAP 3b Project Area in the context of Lake Albert and Buliisa .............................................. 12 Figure 5: RAP 4 Project area in the context of Lake Albert, Buliisa and Hoima .................................... 13 Figure 6: RAP 5 Project Area in the context of Lake Albert and Buliisa ................................................ 14 Figure 7: Overlaps in the Tilenga Project RAPs 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4 and 5 ...................................................... 83 Figure 8: Grievance flow chart .............................................................................................................. 102 Figure 9: Copy of a signed Cut-off date form and poster .................................................................... 109 Figure 10: Residential Structures existing at the RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 project sites .......................... 124 Figure 11 : House Designs ....................................................................................................................... 128 Figure 12: Procedure for PAPs locating replacement residential land ................................................. 131 Figure 13: Procedure for PAPs locating replacement agricultural land ............................................... 132 Figure 14: Procedure for the Project to identify land for resettlement village(s) .............................. 134 Figure 15: RAP Implementation Team Structure .................................................................................. 156 Figure 16: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Implementation Schedule .................................................................. 170 TILENGA PROJECT – RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLANS 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page iii Atacama Consulting LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Location and Project Land Take for RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Project Components ...................... 6 Table 2: Tilenga RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Project Details ............................................................................. 15 Table 3: Affected Public Access roads .................................................................................................... 25 Table 4: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Intersection with other RAP footprints. ............................................... 30 Table 5: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Land Tenure Arrangements .................................................................... 32 Table 6: Categories of PAPs affected by RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Projects ............................................... 34 Table 7: Stakeholder Engagement Activities conducted during RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 ........................ 36 Table 8: Signatories to the Landowner identification, land user identification and the spousal consent forms ....................................................................................................................................................... 48 Table 9: List of FGDs and KII undertaken for RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 ...................................................... 50 Table 10: Stakeholders consulted as pertains to RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 CH ............................................ 61 Table 11: Summary of potential vulnerable people categories ............................................................. 85 Table 12: Scoring criteria for developing the VPAH list ......................................................................... 86 Table 13: Proposed Vulnerable People Support Programmes and Interventions ............................... 88 Table 14: Key Impact Findings ................................................................................................................ 90 Table 15: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 land take by parish ................................................................................ 94 Table 16: Category of Loses under RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Project Components ................................... 96 Table 17: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 recorded grievances by Category as of 5th August 2020 .................... 104 Table 18: Eligibility Framework .............................................................................................................. 107 Table 19: RAPs 2, 3a, 3b, 4 & 5 Entitlement & Eligibility Framework .................................................... 111 Table 20: Type and numbers of affected structures ............................................................................ 119 Table 21: Rooms and features of House design .................................................................................... 124 Table 22: Site Feasibility ......................................................................................................................... 133 Table 23: Overlap within RAPs 2-5 Surveyed Households .................................................................... 135 Table 24: Project infrastructure / RAP# Matrix ..................................................................................... 138 Table 25: Percentage of population impacted per RAP ....................................................................... 138 Table 26: General strategies for mitigating economic displacement impacts ................................... 139 Table 27: Sample structure for aggregated database per HH ..............................................................141 Table 28: Monitoring and Evaluation Framework ...............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Peoples Voice COP21 Uganda

    Peoples Voice COP21 Uganda

    the People’s voice uganda COMMUNITY PRIORITY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PEPFAR UGANDA FOR 2021 Introduction: Developing “The People’s Voice” Since 2012, communities of People living with HIV (PLHIV), Key and Vulnerable Populations (KVPs) and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), under the leadership of the International Community of Women Living with HIV Eastern Africa (ICWEA), the Coalition for Health Promotion and Social Development (HEPS-Uganda) and Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) in collaboration with global partners including Health GAP and AVAC have been monitoring and informing PEPFAR Country Operational Planning (COP) processes. At that time, there were no minimum standards for the meaningful engagement of PLHIV, KVPs and CSOs and discussions with the U.S. government regarding Uganda’s COP would take place only in meetings at the U.S. Embassy. PLHIV, KVP and CSOs worked to ensure that the engagement processes became truly community- owned and community-led. They established a structured calendar, clear expectations of civil society and of PEPFAR Uganda, and a shared focus with PEPFAR Uganda on improving the accountability of the HIV response for communities and CSOs. This is the third edition of The People’s Voice; the first was facilities which are located in 28 districts (see Table A, page 3) published in 20191 and the second in 2020.2 Successes resulting during the CLM pilot phase (August-September 2020) and Focus from these efforts over the years include: introduction and scale Group Discussions (FGDs) with community representatives.
  • Local Content in the Oil and Gas Sector in Uganda Presented to The

    Local Content in the Oil and Gas Sector in Uganda Presented to The

    Local Content in the oil and gas Sector in Uganda Presented to the Community Dialogues Bintu Peter Kenneth Enterprise Development Officer Petroleum Authority of Uganda October 2020 PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1. Introduction: 2. Initiatives to enhance national participation 3. Progress registered 4. Sectoral linkages 5. What next after FID 6. Linkages 7. Conclusion 1. Introduction: National Content Development in the oil and gas sector Definition Employment of Ugandan • Value added or created in the Ugandan citizens. economy through the employment of Ugandan workers and the use of goods Transfer of produced or available in Uganda and knowledge Capacity and services provided by Ugandan citizens technology; building; and enterprises Key pillars National Content goal : Use of locally produced Enterprise To achieve in-country value creation goods and development; and retention whilst ensuring services competitiveness, efficiency and effectiveness. Introduction: Existing policy & regulatory framework National Oil and Gas Policy The Petroleum (Exploration, Development and Production) Act, 2013 Petroleum (Refining, Conversion, Transmission and Midstream Storage) Act, 2013 The Petroleum (Exploration, Development and Production) Regulations 2016 The Petroleum (Refining, Conversion, Transmission and Midstream Storage) Regulations 2016 The Petroleum (Exploration, Development and Production) (National Content) Regulations 2016 The Petroleum (Refining, Conversion, Transmission and Midstream Storage) (National Content) Regulations, 2016. 5 2. Initiatives to achieve National Content National Content Study, 2011 . 1. Opportunities and challenges for Communication of and oil and gas projects Ugandans’ participation in oil gas demand 2. 8. Creation of an projects. Envisage creation Enterprise of technical Enhancement training institute Industry Baseline Survey, 2013 Centre . Undertaken by Oil companies to assess local capacity to supply the 7.
  • 23 East African Railways and Harbours Administration

    23 East African Railways and Harbours Administration

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION INSTITUTE OF CURRENT WORLD AFFAIRS Washing%on, D.C. ast Africa High Commission November 29, 195 (2) East African Railways and Harbours Administration Mr. Walter S. Rogers Institute of Current World Affairs 22 Fifth Avenue New York 6, New York Dear Mr. Rogers The public Railways and Inland Marine Service of ast Africa, a] oerated by the Railways and Harbours Administration, are by far the rlncipal means of transport of the area. In 1992 they performed some I,98,60,O ton miles of freight haulage and some 6,,898 passenger orneys over ,O99 route miles of metre gauge railway and other routes. The present role of the railway is varie. At the outlying pointB it is rovidlng access to new agrlc,tural areas and to mineral operations. Along established lines it continues to bring in the capital equipment for development and the import goods in demand by the uropean, Asian and African population; but it also is serving increasingly as an economic integrator, allowing regional agricultural specialization so that each smal bloc of territory ned not remain fully self sufficient in food grains. The comparatively cheap*haulage to the coast of larger quantities of export produce, sisal, cotton, coffee, sod-ash, is a necessary facility for the expanding economy of .East Africa. The railway also gives mobility to labor in ast Africa, facilitating the migrations necessary for agricultural purposes and for industries denendent upon large numbers of African personnel. By providing longer heavier haulge services, the railways complement their own and other motor transport service; the natural difficulties of road building and maintanance being formidable in East Africa, it is usually accepted that truck haulage routes should be ancilary to the railway.
  • UNICEF Uganda End-Of-Year Humanitarian Situation Report

    UNICEF Uganda End-Of-Year Humanitarian Situation Report

    Uganda Country Office Humanitarian Situation Report No. 5 UNICEF/UNI3255804/Abdul © Reporting Period: May 2020 Situation in Numbers Highlights • As of 31 May, Uganda had a cumulative total of 457 COVID-19 cases, including 2.12 million 73 recoveries and zero deaths. Seven new cases among health care workers # of children in need of were confirmed during this reporting period. Uganda has tested a cumulative humanitarian assistance 96,825 individuals for COVID-19 since the beginning of the outbreak. (UNICEF HAC 2020) • 923,994 people (463,845 female) were reached with key messages on the prevention and control of COVID-19 in May. • On 4 May, Moroto District confirmed its first cholera outbreak since 2016. 3.48 million # of people in need • 39,214 people were reached with sufficient quantities of water for drinking, cooking and personal hygiene. (UNICEF HAC 2020) • Flooding displaced 24,335 people, according to the Office of the Prime Minister, while affecting 176,620 people through the destruction of homes, crops and 840,380 infrastructure and the disruption of livelihood activities. # of refugees and asylum- • 353,833 women and children (176,209 male, 177,624 female) were reached seekers who are children with essential health care services during the reporting period. • Since April 2020, 499,929 primary caregivers of children (248,965 male, 250,964 female) were reached with infant and young child feeding (IYCF) 1.42 million counselling through facilities and community platforms. # of total refugees and • 61,625 children (30,689 boys, 30,936 girls) were reached with home- asylum-seekers (OPM, Pro based/distance learning to ensure continuity of learning as of May 2020.
  • Hoima Profile.Indd

    Hoima Profile.Indd

    Hoima District Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Profi le 2016 HOIMA DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE a Acknowledgment On behalf of Office of the Prime Minister, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to all of the key stakeholders who provided their valuable inputs and support to this Multi-Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability mapping exercise that led to the production of comprehensive district Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability (HRV) profiles. I extend my sincere thanks to the Department of Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Management, under the leadership of the Commissioner, Mr. Martin Owor, for the oversight and management of the entire exercise. The HRV assessment team was led by Ms. Ahimbisibwe Catherine, Senior Disaster Preparedness Officer supported by Mr. Odong Martin, Disaster Management Officer and the team of consultants (GIS/DRR specialists); Dr. Bernard Barasa, and Mr. Nsiimire Peter, who provided technical support. Our gratitude goes to UNDP for providing funds to support the Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability Mapping. The team comprised of Mr. Steven Goldfinch – Disaster Risk Management Advisor, Mr. Gilbert Anguyo - Disaster Risk Reduction Analyst, and Mr. Ongom Alfred-Early Warning system Programmer. My appreciation also goes to Hoima District Team; 1. Mr. Luke L.L Lokuda – Chief Administrative Officer 2. Ms. Nyangoma Joseline – District Natural Resources Officer 3. Ms. Nsita Gertrude - District Environment Officer The entire body of stakeholders who in one way or another yielded valuable ideas and time to support the completion of this exercise. Hon. Hilary O. Onek Minister for Relief, Disaster Preparedness and Refugees HOIMA DISTRICT HAZARD, RISK AND VULNERABILITY PROFILE i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The multi-hazard vulnerability profile outputs from this assessment was a combination of spatial modeling using socio-ecological spatial layers (i.e.
  • My Illustrious (But Brief) Military Career Or How My Name Never Made It Ontothe Regimental Roll

    My Illustrious (But Brief) Military Career Or How My Name Never Made It Ontothe Regimental Roll

    My Illustrious (but brief) Military Career Or How My Name Never Made it OntoThe Regimental Roll [Jitze Couperus] You may be interested in some background as to why I never made it officially on to the Kenya Regiment Long Roll; I was basically, a Uganda boy and while Uganda boys did participate in the CCF (Combined Cadet Force) while at the Prince of Wales School, they were never actually called- up into The Regiment on leaving school. This was because, as Uganda residents, they did not live in a British Colony – rather they lived in what was merely a British Protectorate where conscription rules did not apply. However, Murphy’s Law struck. During my last term at the Prince of Wales, two things happened. My parents moved to Nairobi (thus I was in transition to becoming a Kenya resident) and peace in the Congo blew apart within hours of independence. So my last term at school was cut short; the other boys were sent home early because the dormitories were needed to house Belgian refugees, but I had to stay on as one of a few senior prefects to help receive and settle the refugees. During this exercise it was discovered by “the authorities” that I spoke Dutch (my parents had come originally from Holland) - which was very useful in communicating with some of the Belgians – as Dutch is very similar Flemish. Also I was conversant in the local variety of Swahili spoken in Western Uganda and across the border in The Congo - which was useful in communicating with Greek refugees whom the Belgians had originally imported to work as fundis (craftsmen) in the mines at Union Minière.
  • Developments and Investment Opportunities in Uganda's

    Developments and Investment Opportunities in Uganda's

    UNCTAD OILGASMINE Special Event 15-16 October 2014 Palais des Nations, Geneva DEVELOPMENTS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN UGANDA’S PETROLEUM SECTOR Mr. Ernest N.T. RUBONDO Commissioner, Petroleum Exploration and Production Department Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Uganda 15 October 2014 The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UNCTAD MINISTRY OF ENERGY AND MINERAL DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENTS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN UGANDA’S PETROLEUM SECTOR Presented by ERNEST N.T. RUBONDO COMMISSIONER, PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT AFRICA OILGASMINE ORGANISED BY UNCTAD GENEVA, SWITZERLAND 15th OCTOBER 2014 PRESENTATION OUTLINEPRESENTATIONOUTLINE 1. Introduction 2. Status of the Sector • Commercialisation Plans • Refinery Development • Transportation and Storage Facilities 3. National Participation 4. Investment Opportunities and Incentives 5. Conclusions 2 © Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Republic of Uganda 1. INTRODUCTION1.INTRODUCTION Africa is home to some of the world’s fastest- growing economies, some (e.g Ghana) of them lifted by new oil and gas finds. The East African region is emerging as a premier destination for oil and gas exploration and development. Petroleum discoveries have been made in South Sudan, Uganda, Tanzania, Mozambique and Kenya. East Africa consumes about 200,000 barrels of petroleum products per day and demand is increasing at an average rate of 7% per year. All petroleum products are currently imported into the region at over US$5 billion per year representing over 25% of the total import bill of Drilling of the Turaco-1 well the region. 3 © Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, Republic of Uganda INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION KEY FACTS ABOUT UGANDA Location: East Africa Land area: Approx.
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN

    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
  • Tilenga & Eacop Projects with a Socio-Economic Interest for Uganda

    Tilenga & Eacop Projects with a Socio-Economic Interest for Uganda

    TILENGA & EACOP PROJECTS WITH A SOCIO-ECONOMIC INTEREST FOR UGANDA AND TANZANIA The teams of Total and its partners Tullow and CNOOC are currently working on an oil development project in Uganda, called Tilenga, and an oil pipeline project through Uganda and Tanzania, EACOP, which will transport the oil to the port of Tanga. For the two host countries, these projects will have a significant economic and social impact. A LONG HISTORY OF TOTAL A COMMITMENT TO PRESERVING A COMMITMENT TO MINIMIZING ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS IN THE REGION THE REGION'S SENSITIVE THE IMPACT ON LOCAL POPULATIONS OF THE IMPACTED PEOPLE with a presence in Uganda for ENVIRONMENT by limiting relocations by keeping them informed, getting 60 years and in Tanzania through a mitigation hierarchy and supporting the individuals them involved and considering for almost 50 years. approach “Avoid – Reduce/ concerned. their opinions into each stage Restore – Compensate” of project implementation. and concrete actions. SOUDAN DU SUD ÉTHIOPIE Murchison Falls National Park The EACOP project involves UGANDA The Tilenga project the construction of an comprises oil exploration, underground hydrocarbon Tilenga a crude oil processing transport pipeline starting Hoima plant, underground just inside the Uganda border pipelines, and (Hoima District - 297km) and Lake infrastructure in the extending through Tanzania Albert Buliisa and Nwoya (1147km) to an oil depot and districts of Uganda. an offshore loading terminal in Tanga. Lake Edward Lake Victoria Bukoba RWANDA KENYA BURUNDI DEMOCRATIC EACOP REPUBLIC INDIAN OCEAN OF CONGO TANZANIA Singida Tanga SEPTEMBER 2019 ZAMBIE MOZAMBIQUE MALAWI SOUDAN DU SUD THIOPIE FOCUS ON THE TILENGA PROJECT Total E&P Uganda, fully aware of the project's sensitive nature, has placed particular emphasis on environmental and societal issues, with a specific commitment to leaving the site in a better state than it was before the work started and to limiting residents' relocations as much as possible.
  • Table of Contents List of Tables

    Table of Contents List of Tables

    TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 PROJECT IMPACTS ................................................................................................................ 138 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 138 Summary of Impacts ................................................................................................................. 138 Impacts on Land ....................................................................................................................... 143 6.3.1 Land Requirements and Land Use Context ......................................................................... 143 Impacts on houses – Physical Displacement ........................................................................... 149 Impacts on other structures ...................................................................................................... 153 Impacts on Communal Buildings .............................................................................................. 159 Graves and Cultural Heritage Assets ....................................................................................... 160 Impacts on Crops and Economic Trees .................................................................................... 160 Impacts on Livelihood Activities – Economic Displacement ..................................................... 166 Impacts on Public Utilities/Infrastructure ..................................................................................
  • Kingfisher ESIA Non Technical Summary

    Kingfisher ESIA Non Technical Summary

    November 2019 CNOOC UGANDA LIMITED ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE KINGFISHER FIELD DEVELOPMENT AREA IN KIKUUBE & HOIMA DISTRICTS, UGANDA Submitted to: The Executive Director National Environment Management Authority NEMA House, Plot 17/19/21 Jinja Road, P. O. Box 22255 Kampala, Uganda TECHNICAL SUMMARY TECHNICAL - NON – Report Number: 1776816-318326-2 REPORT NON TECHNICAL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project overview ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Existing infrastructure ........................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Well pads ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Production and injection wells ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2 Drilling .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2.1 Drilling fluids ............................................................................................................................
  • Nyakahita-Ibanda-Kamwenge Road Upgrading Project

    Nyakahita-Ibanda-Kamwenge Road Upgrading Project

    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSENT SUMMARY Project Name: Road Sector Support Project 3: Nyakahita-Ibanda-Kamwenge Road Upgrading Project Country: Uganda Project Number: P-UG-DB0-020 1.0 Introduction Following a request by the Government of Uganda to the African Development Bank (AfDB) to finance the upgrading of the Nyakahita-Ibanda-Kamwenge road from gravel to bitumen standard an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment had to be carried out by the project proponent (Uganda National Roads Authority – UNRA). UNRA in contracted the services of Consulting Engineering Services (India) Private Limited in Association with KOM Consult Limited to carry out the ESIA which was completed in January 2009, and the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) reviewed and approved the report on 13 March 2009. The ESIA Summary is being posted on the AfDB website for pubic information as is required by the Bank policy on public disclosure. The summary covers: i) Project description and justification, ii) Policy legal and administrative framework, iii) Description of the project environment, iv) Project alternatives, v) potential impacts and mitigation/enhancement measures, vi) environmental and social management plan, vii) monitoring program, viii) public consultations and disclosure, ix) ESMP and cost estimates, x) conclusion and recommendations, xi) reference and contacts, and xii) an annex “resettlement action plan” (RAP). 2.0 Project Description and Justification The project is in Western Uganda and the project road traverses three districts of Kirihura, Ibanda and Kamwenge which have an estimated population of 0.7 million people. The rest of the road continues to Fort Portal in Kabalore district. The project shall upgrade the road from gravel to paved standards and is 153 km long and it has a 6 m wide carriageway and 1.5 m shoulders on either side.