DOCSLIB.ORG

New Master File 5 PM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Master File 5 PM Regional Transportation Authority 2005 Annual Budget and Five-Year Program Regional Transportation Authority Table of Contents Budget and Program Ordinance 3 Agency Operating Plan 6 Pace Operating Plan RTA Board of Directors ........................................... 1 Overview .............................................................. 37 Overview .............................................................. 71 Overview ................................................................ 1 Operating Budget and Financial Plan ..................... 37 Service ................................................................ 71 Six-County Area ...................................................... 1 Operations by Expense Category .......................... 38 Budget and Financial Plan .................................... 75 Ordinance No. 2005–06 ......................................... 2 Operations by Organization Group ......................... 39 System–Generated Revenues ............................... 75 Agency Statutory Cap ........................................... 42 Operating Expenses ............................................. 75 1 Budget in Brief 2004 Budget Versus 2004 Estimate ..................... 42 Expense Elements ............................................... 77 Overview .............................................................. 13 Regional Technical Assistance and Coordination ... 42 Deficit ................................................................. 78 Strategic Focus .................................................... 14 Regional Technology and Capital Programs ........... 44 Funding ............................................................... 78 Challenges .......................................................... 14 Organizational Structure ....................................... 46 Recovery Ratio ..................................................... 79 Service ................................................................ 14 2004 Budget Versus 2004 Estimate ..................... 79 Operating Plan ..................................................... 14 4 CTA Operating Plan Statutory Compliance ........................................... 79 Revenues ............................................................ 15 Overview .............................................................. 49 Fare Structure ...................................................... 79 Operating Expenditures ........................................ 16 Service ................................................................ 49 Organizational Structure ....................................... 80 Debt Service and Capital Expenditures ................. 17 Budget and Financial Plan .................................... 52 Fund Balance ....................................................... 17 System–Generated Revenues ............................... 52 7 Capital Program Recovery Ratio ..................................................... 18 Operating Expenses ............................................. 53 Regional Overview ................................................ 83 Statutory Compliance ........................................... 18 Expense Elements ............................................... 54 Source of Funds ................................................... 83 Public Funding ..................................................... 18 Deficit ................................................................. 56 Use of Funds ....................................................... 86 Capital Program ................................................... 19 Funding ............................................................... 56 CTA Overview ....................................................... 87 Recovery Ratio ..................................................... 56 Metra Overview .................................................... 90 2 Region Operating Plan 2004 Budget Versus 2004 Estimate ..................... 57 Pace Overview ..................................................... 92 Overview .............................................................. 21 Statutory Compliance ........................................... 58 Five–Year Capital Program (Schedule II) ................ 94 Budget and Financial Plan .................................... 21 Organizational Structure ....................................... 58 Revenue .............................................................. 21 8 Appendices Operating Expenditures ........................................ 24 5 Metra Operating Plan 2005 Budget Call Calendar .................................. 99 Debt Service and Capital Expenditures ................. 25 Overview .............................................................. 61 Public Hearings Notice and Overview .................. 100 Total Expenditures ............................................... 26 Service ................................................................ 61 Glossary ............................................................ 101 Fund Balance ....................................................... 26 Budget and Financial Plan .................................... 65 Supplemental Data ............................................ 105 Recovery Ratio ..................................................... 26 System–Generated Revenues ............................... 65 National Economic Projections ........................... 105 Capital Program ................................................... 27 Operating Expenses ............................................. 66 RTA Region ........................................................ 106 2004 Budget Versus 2004 Estimate ..................... 27 Expense Elements ............................................... 67 Six-County Region and County Seats ................... 108 Region Reference ................................................. 28 Deficit ................................................................. 68 The GFOA Distinguished Presentation Award ....... 109 Authority and Responsibility ................................. 28 Funding ............................................................... 68 Budget Process .................................................... 29 Recovery Ratio ..................................................... 68 RTA Bonds ........................................................... 30 2004 Budget Versus 2004 Estimate ..................... 68 Fund Accounting ................................................... 32 Statutory Compliance ........................................... 68 Governmental Fund Types .................................... 32 Fare Structure ...................................................... 68 Proprietary Fund .................................................. 33 Organizational Structure ....................................... 68 Fiduciary Fund Types ............................................ 33 Fund Balance ....................................................... 33 Basis of Budgeting ............................................... 34 RTA Annual Budget and Five-Year Program 1 Budget & Program Ordinance RTA Board of Directors Overview Six–County Area Chairman* The Board of Directors of the Regional RTA Board of Directors Transportation Authority (RTA) adopted Carole L. Brown the ordinance that follows approving the Chicago Transit Authority 2005 annual budget and two-year financial Allan C. Carr plan, and five-year capital program for the Suburban Board Members of Cook County Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Metra Patrick J. Durante commuter rail and Pace suburban bus. The DuPage County ordinance also approves the 2005 budget Armando Gomez, Sr. City of Chicago and program for the RTA (Agency). The RTA is charged through an act of Dwight A. Magalis Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties the Illinois Legislature with overseeing Mary M. McDonald the financial stability of public transpor- Suburban Board Members of Cook County tation in the six-county region of north- Fred T. L. Norris eastern Illinois. Chief among its respons- Kane, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties ibilities is the adoption of a balanced Thomas H. Reece annual budget and capital program that City of Chicago consolidates the operating plans and capi- Michael Rosenberg tal programs of the RTA, CTA, Metra City of Chicago and Pace. The budget adopted by the Donald L. Totten Suburban Board Members of Cook County Board is balanced and meets the criteria set forth in the RTA Act. Douglas M. Troiani Suburban Board Members of Cook County Although a balanced budget was adopted, operations costs, the RTA system is in need the CTA as well as Metra and Pace (also of a continuing source of local matching Rev. Addie L. Wyatt City of Chicago known as the Service Boards) face chal- funds for federal capital dollars. This local Paula S. Thibeault lenges to fund and maintain service levels funding is essential to maintain the existing Executive Director in the coming years. Higher security and transit system and to expand the system * Vacant at time of printing fuel costs as well as health care costs and to meet future needs for more suburb-to- the increase in the number of reduced fare suburb and reverse commuting options. The and paratransit trips are adding pressure to RTA Board supports the Service Boards’ the Service Boards’ ability to keep costs in efforts to secure additional funding for line with revenues. In addition to higher their operations and capital programs. 2 RTA Annual Budget and Five-Year Program Ordinance No. 2005–06
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Application for Metroaccess Door-To-Door Paratransit Service for People with Disabilities DO NOT MAIL OR FAX APPLICATION
    Application for MetroAccess Door-to-Door Paratransit Service For People with Disabilities DO NOT MAIL OR FAX APPLICATION Transit Accessibility Center 600 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 (Between Chinatown/Gallery Place and Judiciary Square Metro Stations) (202) 962-2700 & select option #5 TTY (202) 962-2033 All Assessments are by Appointment Only Thank you for your interest in Metro services for people with disabilities. The following services are available based on Metro’s determination of your eligibility: (A) Reduced Fare Program for People with Disabilities – Eligible people with disabilities travel on accessible Metrobus and Metrorail for half the regular (rush hour) fare at all times. This program is available for people with disabilities who use the accessible Metrobus and Metrorail system as their primary travel option. For more information on the Reduced Fare program or to obtain an application please visit our website at http://www.wmata.com/service/accessibility/transit-accessibility.cfm under the section titled “Eligibility for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program” or call (202) 962-2700 and select option 1 from the phone menu. (B) MetroAccess – Door-to-door, shared ride public paratransit is a service for people with disabilities who are unable to use regular accessible Metrobus and Metrorail public transportation for some or all of their public transportation due to a disability. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) outlines specific criteria to determine eligibility for paratransit service and an application and in-person assessment is required. MetroAccess operates throughout the metropolitan area where there is regular bus and/or rail service. Service is provided in Washington, DC; Montgomery County and Prince George’s County in Maryland; Arlington County, Fairfax County, City of Alexandria, City of Fairfax, and City of Falls Church in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Fare Discount Act Pdf
    Student Fare Discount Act Pdf Experienceless Manuel assert very transcontinentally while Darby remains unperpetrated and madding. Whiskered Marcelo sometimes sag any oxygenate rebuke piggyback. Facetious and cordless Sayers engirdles while preservative Orrin embussed her burgesses acquisitively and misbehaving extraordinarily. Aside from local beer selection of skin symptoms appear Disabilities Act ADA of 1990 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. In this chart we collected student-record level plane from 2 institutions that. Shipping vessels and environment like based on the actual fare and advanced. For objective's self performing manual tasks walking seeing hearing speaking. Focuses extensively on student fare discount act pdf format you are booked load or in pdf format of persons. Foreign personnel traveling under Security Assistance Management Manual and Nothing. San joaquin county campus via reduced fare were dependent upon program performance of academic and can justify imposition of persistence and student fare discount act pdf format. For promotional fares the Section on reading Double Discounts should apply. Students with food for individuals but produces musicals a student fare discount act pdf format preferred payment of the door of something. Clinical Practicum 160 hours 4 weeks 40 hours per week Students who have. The Federal Student Aid Income Based Repayment IBR Plan MediCal. Commuter Advantage Program Metrostlouisorg Site Metro. Transportation Florida Developmental Disabilities Council. Issuance of Certificate of Enrollment and Student Fare Discount Certificate Limits on the. Regional MeansBased Transit Fare Pricing Study. Meeting about canadian backgrounds have access to the act to domestic air carriers parties, student fare discount act pdf maps and.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transportation
    TRANSPORTATION NETWORK DIRECTORY FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES AND ADULTS 50+ MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION Montgomery County, Maryland (‘the County’) cannot guarantee the relevance, completeness, accuracy, or timeliness of the information provided on the non-County links. The County does not endorse any non-County organizations' products, services, or viewpoints. The County is not responsible for any materials stored on other non-County web sites, nor is it liable for any inaccurate, defamatory, offensive or illegal materials found on other Web sites, and that the risk of injury or damage from viewing, hearing, downloading or storing such materials rests entirely with the user. Alternative formats of this document are available upon request. This is a project of the Montgomery County Commission on People with Disabilities. To submit an update, add or remove a listing, or request an alternative format, please contact: [email protected], 240-777-1246 (V), MD Relay 711. MetroAccess and Abilities-Ride MetroAccess Paratransit – Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) MetroAccess is a shared-ride, door-to-door public transportation service for people who are unable to use fixed-route public transit due to disability. "Shared ride" means that multiple passengers may ride together in the same vehicle. The service provides daily trips throughout the Transit Zone in the Washington Metropolitan region. The Transit Zone consists of the District of Columbia, Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties in Maryland, Arlington and Fairfax Counties and the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax and Falls Church in Northern Virginia. Rides are offered in the same service areas and during the same hours of operation as Metrorail and Metrobus.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Cost Metro Transportation for People with Disabilities
    REDUCED COST AND FREE METRO TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES Individual Day Supports are tailored services and supports that are provided to a person or a small group of no more than two (2) people, in the community. This service lends very well to the use of public transportation and associated travel training, allowing for active learning while exploring the community and its resources. While the set rate includes funding for transportation, it is important to be resourceful when possible, using available discount programs to make your funds go further. METRO TRANSIT ACCESSIBILITY CENTER The Metro Transit Accessibility Center (202)962-2700 located at Metro headquarters, 600 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC 20001, offers the following services to people with disabilities: Information and application materials for the Reduced Fare (half fare) program for Metrobus and Metrorail Information and application materials for the MetroAccess paratransit service Consultations and functional assessments to determine eligibility for MetroAccess paratransit service Replacement ID cards for MetroAccess customers Support (by phone) for resetting your MetroAccess EZ-Pay or InstantAccess password The Transit Accessibility Center office hours are 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. weekdays, with the exception of Tuesdays with hours from 8 a.m. - 2:30 p.m. REDUCED FAIR PROGRAM Metro offers reduced fare for people with disabilities who require accessibility features to use public transportation and who have a valid Metro Disability ID. The Metro Disability ID card offers a discount of half the peak fare on Metrorail, and a reduced fare of for 90¢ cash, or 80¢ paying with a SmarTrip® card on regular Metrobus routes, and a discounted fare on other participating bus service providers.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens
    Accessible Transportation Options for People with Disabilities and Senior Citizens In the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan Area JANUARY 2017 Transfer Station Station Features Red Line • Glenmont / Shady Grove Bus to Airport System Orange Line • New Carrollton / Vienna Parking Station Legend Blue Line • Franconia-Springfield / Largo Town Center in Service Map Hospital Under Construction Green Line • Branch Ave / Greenbelt Airport Full-Time Service wmata.com Yellow Line • Huntington / Fort Totten Customer Information Service: 202-637-7000 Connecting Rail Systems Rush-Only Service: Monday-Friday Silver Line • Wiehle-Reston East / Largo Town Center TTY Phone: 202-962-2033 6:30am - 9:00am 3:30pm - 6:00pm Metro Transit Police: 202-962-2121 Glenmont Wheaton Montgomery Co Prince George’s Co Shady Grove Forest Glen Rockville Silver Spring Twinbrook B30 to Greenbelt BWI White Flint Montgomery Co District of Columbia College Park-U of Md Grosvenor - Strathmore Georgia Ave-Petworth Takoma Prince George’s Plaza Medical Center West Hyattsville Bethesda Fort Totten Friendship Heights Tenleytown-AU Prince George’s Co Van Ness-UDC District of Columbia Cleveland Park Columbia Heights Woodley Park Zoo/Adams Morgan U St Brookland-CUA African-Amer Civil Dupont Circle War Mem’l/Cardozo Farragut North Shaw-Howard U Rhode Island Ave Brentwood Wiehle-Reston East Spring Hill McPherson Mt Vernon Sq NoMa-Gallaudet U New Carrollton Sq 7th St-Convention Center Greensboro Fairfax Co Landover Arlington Co Tysons Corner Gallery Place Union Station Chinatown Cheverly 5A to
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Locally Preferred Alternative Report
    SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENT #9 LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT PREPARED BY AUGUST 2011 METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS DOCUMENTS 1. Detailed Work Scope 2. Purpose & Need 3. Initial Alternatives, Part I: Modes & Technologies 4. Evaluation Methodology 5. Initial Alternatives, Part I Screening and Part II: Conceptual Design 6. Screening of Initial Alternatives, Part II 7. Feasible Alternatives 8. Screening of Feasible Alternatives 9. Locally Preferred Alternative Report AECOM AUGUST 2011 I METRA – SOUTHEAST CORRIDOR LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................... 1 A. PURPOSE.................................................................................................................. 1 B. BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 II. SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS.............................................................. 5 A. INITIAL SCREENING, PART I................................................................................... 5 B. DEFINITION AND SCREENING OF INITIAL ALTERNATIVES, PART II.................. 7 C. DEFINITION OF FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVES ........................................................ 10 D. DETAILED FINAL SCREENING.............................................................................. 11 III. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • First-Year Impact of Reduced Transit Fares on Southern California Rapid Transit District
    Transportation Research Record 992 61 First-Year Impact of Reduced Transit Fares on Southern California Rapid Transit District SUSAN PHIFER ABSTRACT percent allocation of the sales tax funds to cities is permanent. For the first 3 years--July 1, 1982, through June In 1980 voters in Los Angeles County passed 30, 1985--the first claim on the balance of the a referendum designed to support public funds is for fare reductions. The district's base transit development through a dedicated fare was reduced from 85 to 50 cents with concurrent sales tax. One feature of this referendum, reductions in the balance of the district's fare the reduced-fare program, substantially structure. Funds are provided for the additional lowered the bus fares at the Southern Cali­ service necessary to relieve overcrowding from fornia Rapid Transit District (SCRTO) and increased ridership induced by the lower fare. Funds provided a subsidy to maintain adequate will also be allocat.ed to the municipal bus oper­ service levels. The lower fares precipitated ators as necessary, to keep their ba·se fare at the a surge in patronage on SCRTD lines. This SO-cent level. During the first 3 years, funds not growth in system boardings made it necessary required for the fare-reduction program are avail­ to accelerate monitoring of the bus lines able for rapid transit development programs. and to increase service levels in many The fare-reduction program of Proposition A ends cases. The attempts made by SCRTD to deal in July 1985. At that time funds w-111 be reallocated with the patronage growth and the impacts on as follows: 25 percent for the cities, a minimum of patronage, service levels, and operating 35 percent for transit guideway development (Metro productivity are described.
    [Show full text]
  • Mta Disability Card Application
    Mta Disability Card Application Mistyped and spathose Saxe subordinated impassibly and castigate his zithers sheer and vigilantly. Thallous or phenomenalistic, Greg never elegised any gendarmeries! Wall-less Tristan longes patriotically. In accordance with disabilities identification card privileges to mta will be! General Information about Suffolk County Transit. PATH Train Fare Information SmartLink and Metrocard Information. Other requests with a payment is made public requires ada accessible stations that configuration attempts; your gifts in cash on our hope that should. Updating the asset requires approval. This instance be always i found on why left hand master of the divine booth, workplace tools, but nature can only produce it solve certain blanks. The reduced fare Metrocard can be used to purchase a single journey alone or an unlimited journey weekly or monthly Metrocard. You want to mta cuts, minus a different from a ride wherever you board their guidelines will receive my mta disability card application does not offer free staten island. This asset at some additional surcharge when requested as data source type using feeder service center on. When it comes to paratransit services, or shared in person, a public transit provider has been logged in all of them as a user. Fares application date, go back in all applicants are you can also load transit cards, which shows that provides transportation needs. Punch passes and tickets are paid available. PART operates four fixed routes year play in realm to a seasonal trolley in Cold Spring put a commuter shuttle to the Metro North point at Croton Falls. Emotional: Individual with enough mental or emotional impairment listed in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V of grand American Psychiatric Association, Council on Aging, be rescue before the card but be used again they enter because system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Fare Reductions on Public Transit Ridership
    iL THE EFFECT OF FARE REDUCTIONS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP John R. Caruolo Roger P. Roess May 1974 PROJECT" REPORT This document was produced as part of a program of Research and Training in Urban Transportation sponsored by UMTA, USDOT. The results and views expressed are the independent products of university research and not necessarily concurred in by UMTA. Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION DIVISION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20 590 1 Of Transportation we Dept. If 3*/ / 0*6 1 MIR a 1976 , I — Library Report No. UMTA-74-6-1 THE EFFECT OF FARE REDUCTIONS ON PUBLIC TRANSIT RIDERSHIP, John R. Caruolo Roger P. Roess - . May 1974 PROJECT REPORT This document was produced as part of a program of Research and Training in Urban Transportation sponsored by UMTA, USDOT. The results and views expressed are the independent products of university research and not necessarily concurred in by UMTA. Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION DIVISION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20 590 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. T*cknicol Report Documentation Page 1. Report Ho. 2. Covtmoml Accrttion No. 3. Rrcipitnt * Cotoloq No. I UMTA-74-6- 1 4. Till* Subtitle 5. Report Do»o The Effect of Fare Reductions on Public May 1974 Transit Ridership 4. Performing Orgont ration Code 8. Performing Organization Report Mo j . Caruol'o, and Roger P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Budget Recommendations
    MODERNIZING TRANSIT FOR THE FUTURE PRESIDENT’S 2014 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS (THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) CTA FY14 Budget Table of Contents Letter from the President ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CTA Organizational Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2013 Operating Budget Performance 2012 Operating Budget Performance Summary ........................................................................................ 25 2012 Operating Budget Schedule ..................................................................................................................... 34 President’s 2014 Proposed Operating Budget President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Summary ....................................................................... 35 President’s 2013 Proposed Operating Budget Schedule ......................................................................... 42 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Summary ............................................. 43 President’s 2015-2016 Proposed Operating Financial Plan Schedule .............................................. 47 2014-2018 Capital
    [Show full text]
  • Go to 2040 Update Appendix
    GO TO 2040 UPDATE APPENDIX Major Capital Projects October 2014 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Major Capital Projects ............................................................................................................................... 2 Expressway Additions: Express Toll Lanes ....................................................................................... 2 I-55 Stevenson Express Toll Lanes ................................................................................................... 2 I-290 Eisenhower Express Toll Lanes .............................................................................................. 3 Expressway Additions: Interchanges and Improvements ............................................................... 4 Circle Interchange .............................................................................................................................. 5 I-294/I-57 Interchange ........................................................................................................................ 5 I-190 Access and Capacity Improvements ...................................................................................... 5 Jane Addams Tollway (I-90) ............................................................................................................. 6 Transit Improvements ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Lake Corridor DEIS Appendix B: References
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation APPENDIX B References December 2016 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation This page intentionally left blank. December 2016 Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Section 4(f) Evaluation References AASHTO. Census Transportation Planning Products for ACS 5-year Data. http://ctpp.transportation.org. Abell, G. 2010. Indi-Illi Park Historic District. National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form. Dyer, IN: Lake County Interim Report,1996. AECOM. 2014. West Lake Corridor Project Existing Conditions Technical Memorandum. AECOM. 2015. Noise and Vibration Technical Report. AECOM. 2015. Traffic Technical Report. Amtrak. 2014. Amtrak. accessed September 24, 2014. http://www.amtrak.com. Andreas, A.T. 1884. History of Cook County, Illinois: from the earliest period to the present time. Reprinted by Unigraphic, 1976. ANSI. 1992. Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound. American National Standard S12.9-1992. Part 2: Measurement of Long-term, Wide-Area Sound. Standards Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY. ANSI. 1993. Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound. American National Standard S12.9-1993. Part 3: Short-Term Measurements with an Observer Present. Standards Secretariat, Acoustical Society of America, New York, NY. Architectural Record Company. 1913. Sweet’s Catalogue of Building Construction, Architects and Builders Edition for 1913. Federal Cement Tile Company. 1913 Edition. New York, New York. pp. 556-557. Barnhart, J.D. and D.L. Riker. 1971. Indiana to 1816 - The Colonial Period. Indiana Historical Bureau and Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis. Baughn, J. 2016. Hohman Avenue Railroad Bridge, Lake County, Indiana.
    [Show full text]