DOCSLIB.ORG

Streamflow Characteristics of Streams in the Helmand Basin, Afghanistan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Streamflow Characteristics of Streams in the Helmand Basin, Afghanistan Prepared under the auspices of the U.S. Agency for International Development Streamflow Characteristics of Streams in the Helmand Basin, Afghanistan By Tara Williams-Sether Data Series 333 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Afghanistan Project Product Number 167 Streamflow Characteristics of Streams in the Helmand Basin, Afghanistan By Tara Williams-Sether Prepared under the auspices of the U.S. Agency for International Development This study was funded by Interagency Agreement 07C442100KB between the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Geological Survey. Data Series 333 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Afghanistan Project Product Number 167 i U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Williams-Sether, Tara, 2008, Streamflow characteristics of streams in the Helmand Basin, Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 333, 341 p. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. ii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................1 History of the stream-gaging program in Afghanistan.....................................................................................4 Explanation of station summaries....................................................................................................................4 Manuscripts.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Statistics of monthly and annual mean discharges........................................................................................5 Monthly and annual flow duration................................................................................................................6 Probability of occurrence of high or low discharges.....................................................................................6 Data considerations..........................................................................................................................................7 Selected References......................................................................................................................................... 7 Streamflow statistics.........................................................................................................................................9 3-0.000-2M Ghazni River near Shina........................................................................................................10 3-0.000-7M Ghazni River at Ghazni Bridge..............................................................................................16 3-0.000-7S Ghazni River at Nauburja........................................................................................................23 3-0.000-8W Ghazni River below Seraj Reservoir..................................................................................... 29 3-1.1L0-5T Park River near Park Dasht.................................................................................................... 36 3-4.1L0-8T Paltu River near Sarafsar........................................................................................................42 3-4.L00-1A Paltu River above Sarde Reservoir........................................................................................ 48 3-4.L00-2A Jilga River below Sarde Reservoir.........................................................................................54 3-4.L00-7A Jilga River at Gardez..............................................................................................................61 3-4.L00-9T Jilga River near Mechalghu.....................................................................................................67 3-5.R00-3T Syahgel River at Syahgel.........................................................................................................73 3-8.1L0-1W Barikab River above Seraj Reservoir......................................................................................79 3-8.R00-1W Sarab River above Seraj Reservoir........................................................................................85 4-0.000-1M Shele Charkh River near Zaranj.............................................................................................92 4-0.000-2M Helmand River at Khwabgah.................................................................................................99 4-0.000-3M Helmand River at Char Burjak............................................................................................105 4-0.000-4M Helmand River at Malakhan................................................................................................112 4-0.000-5M Helmand River at Darweshan..............................................................................................118 4-0.000-6M Helmand River at Lashkargah............................................................................................. 125 4-0.000-6S Helmand River at Girishk.....................................................................................................131 4-0.000-7M Helmand River below Kajakai Reservoir............................................................................ 137 4-0.000-8M Helmand River at Dehraout.................................................................................................145 4-0.000-9M Helmand River at Gizab.......................................................................................................152 4-0.000-10M Helmand River at Gardandewal.........................................................................................158 4-1.21R-7A Tarnak River near Shahjuy...................................................................................................165 4-1.222R-6A Lora River near Shinkay....................................................................................................171 4-1.22R-1A Arghastan River near Kandahar...........................................................................................177 4-1.2L0-5A Dori River near Takhtapul.......................................................................................................184 4-1.L00-1A Arghandab River at Qala-i-Bust.......................................................................................... 190 4-1.L00-3A Arghandab River near Kandahar..........................................................................................198 4-1.L00-4A Arghandab River below Arghandab Reservoir.................................................................... 204 4-1.L00-5A Arghandab River above Arghandab Reservoir.................................................................... 212 4-1.L00-6A Arghandab River at Mizan...................................................................................................219 iii 4-1.L00-9A Arghandab River at Sang-i-Masha...................................................................................... 225 4-13.R00-4A Punjab River at Waras....................................................................................................... 231 4-14.R00-1A Markhana River at Dahane Rishqa....................................................................................237 4-16.R00-3A Syahsang River near Gardandewal....................................................................................243 4-3.L00-2T Sangin Wash (Seraj Canal) at Sangin.................................................................................. 249 4-4.R00-2A Musa Qala River near Musa Qala....................................................................................... 255 4-5.L00-1A Tirin River at Anarjuy/Dehraout..........................................................................................262 4-5.L00-4A Tirin River at Tirin...............................................................................................................269 4-5.L00-8A Tirin River at Urosgan......................................................................................................... 276 4-6.R00-1A Kaj River at Yakhdan...........................................................................................................282 5-0.000-4W Khash River at Dehmazang.................................................................................................288 5-0.000-5M Khash River at Dilaram.......................................................................................................294 6-0.000-3M Farah River at Farah.............................................................................................................301
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress in Afghanistan Bucharest Summit2-4 April 2008 Progress in Afghanistan
    © MOD NL © MOD Canada © MOD Canada Progress in Afghanistan Progress in Bucharest Summit 2-4 April 2008 Bucharest Summit2-4 Progress in Afghanistan Contents page 1. Foreword by Assistant Secretary General for Public Diplomacy, ..........................1 Jean-François Bureau, and NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai 2. Executive summary .........................................................................................................................................2 3. Security ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 • IED attacks and Counter-IED efforts 4 • Musa Qala 5 • Operations Medusa successes - Highlights Panjwayi and Zhari 6 • Afghan National Army 8 • Afghan National Police 10 • ISAF growth 10 4. Reconstruction and Development ............................................................................................... 12 • Snapshots of PRT activities 14 • Afghanistan’s aviation sector: taking off 16 • NATO-Japan Grant Assistance for Grassroots Projects 17 • ISAF Post-Operations Humanitarian Relief Fund 18 • Humanitarian Assistance - Winterisation 18 5. Governance ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 • Counter-Narcotics 20 © MOD Canada Foreword The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission is approaching five years of operations in Afghanistan. This report is a
    [Show full text]
  • People of Ghazni
    Program for Culture & Conflict Studies www.nps.edu/programs/ccs/ Province: Zabul April 13, 2009 Governor: Mohammad Ashraf Nasseri Provincial Police Chief: Colonel Mohammed Yaqoub Population Estimate: Urban: 9,200 Rural: 239,9001 249,100 Area in Square Kilometers: 17,343 Capital: Qalat (formerly known as Qalat-i Ghilzai) Names of Districts: Arghandab, Baghar, Day Chopan, Jaldak, Kaker, Mizan, Now Bahar, Qalat, Shah Joy, Shamulza’i, Shinkay Composition of Population: Ethnic Groups: Religions: Tribal Groups: Tokhi & Hotaki Majority Pashtun Predominately Sunni Ghilzais, Noorzai &Panjpai Islam Durranis Occupation of Population Major: Agriculture (including opium), labor, Minor: Trade, manufacturing, animal husbandry smuggling Crops/Farming/ Poppy, wheat, maize, barley, almonds, Sheep, goat, cow, camel, donkey Livestock:2 grapes, apricots, potato, watermelon, cumin Language: Overwhelmingly Pashtu, although some Dari can be found, mostly as a second language Literacy Rate Total: 1% (1% male, a few younger females)3 Number of Educational Primary & Secondary: 168 (98% all Colleges/Universities: None, although Institutions: 80 male) 35272 student (99% male), some training centers do exist for 866 teachers (97% male) vocational skills Number of Security Incidents, January: 3 May: 6 September: 7 2007:774 February: 4 June: 8 October: 7 March: 3 July: 8 November: 10 April: 11 August: 5 December: 5 Poppy (Opium) Cultivation: 2006: 3,210ha 2007: 1,611ha NGOs Active in Province: Ibn Sina, Vara, ADA, Red Crescent, CADG Total PRT Projects: 40 Other Aid Projects: 573 Planned Cost: $8,283,665 Planned Cost: $19,983,250 Total Spent: $2,997,860 Total Spent: $1,880,920 Transportation: 1 Airstrip in Primary Roads: The ring road from Ghazni to Kandahar passes through Qalat and Qalat “PRT Air” – 2 flights Shah Joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Adits, Caves, Karizi-Qanats, and Tunnels in Afghanistan: an Annotated Bibliography by R
    Adits, Caves, Karizi-Qanats, and Tunnels in Afghanistan: An Annotated Bibliography by R. Lee Hadden Topographic Engineering Center November 2005 US Army Corps of Engineers 7701 Telegraph Road Alexandria, VA 22315-3864 Adits, Caves, Karizi-Qanats, and Tunnels In Afghanistan Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. 1. REPORT DATE 30-11- 2. REPORT TYPE Bibliography 3. DATES COVERED 1830-2005 2005 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER “Adits, Caves, Karizi-Qanats and Tunnels 5b. GRANT NUMBER In Afghanistan: An Annotated Bibliography” 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER HADDEN, Robert Lee 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT US Army Corps of Engineers 7701 Telegraph Road Topographic Alexandria, VA 22315- Engineering Center 3864 9.ATTN SPONSORING CEERD / MONITORINGTO I AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKGROUNDER Military a Nalysis Andeducation for Civilian Leaders June 10, 2010
    INSTITUTE FOR THE Jeffrey Dressler STUDY of WAR BACKGROUNDER Military A nalysis andEducation for Civilian Leaders June 10, 2010 Will the Marines Push into Northern Helmand? Northern Helmand may be the next focal point narcotics network and home to large contingents of of U. S. and British efforts in the province, just enemy fighters, IED manufacturing compounds, four months after U.S. Marines launched the and weapons storage caches.4 Sangin and Kajaki massive Operation Moshtarak in Marjah in central initially became hotspots for the Taliban after Helmand.1 This effort, which would be significantly they were driven from Musa Qala in December smaller in size and scope than Marjah, would 2007. Since then, the Taliban have expanded their concentrate on the troublesome districts of Kajaki presence and run mobile courts and effective shadow and Sangin in northeastern Helmand. governance structures in the districts, offering popular and effective services for the population.5 Speaking to reporters in London on June 7, U.S. Taliban elements operate relatively undisturbed Secretary of Defense Robert Gates said he discussed in the dense agricultural expanse that surrounds the possibility of sending more U.S. forces to both banks of the Helmand River to the south and northeastern Helmand.2 However, Gates noted that north of Sangin. Afghan, U.S., and coalition forces any final decision would be up to General Stanley in the area have been able to conduct only limited McChrystal, commander of U.S. and NATO forces patrolling beyond the district centers and the area in Afghanistan. surrounding the Kajaki dam, which provides power for much of Helmand and portions of Kandahar.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Six Months GR&D
    Governance, Reconstruction, Jan 15, GR&D & Development 2010 Interim Report: The First Six Months GR&D Governance, Reconstruction, & Development “What then should the objective be for this war? The aim needs to be to build an administrative and judicial infrastructure that will deliver security and stability to the population and, as a result, marginalize the Taliban. Simultaneously, it can create the foundations for a modern nation.” -Professor Akbar S. Ahmed Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies American University Cover Captions (clockwise): Afghan children watch US Soldiers from 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Di- vision conduct a dismounted patrol through the village of Pir Zadeh, Dec. 3, 2009. (US Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Dayton Mitchell) US Soldiers from 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division conduct a joint patrol with Afghan National Army soldiers and Afghan National Policemen in Shabila Kalan Village, Zabul Prov- ince, Nov. 30, 2009. (US Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Efren Lopez) An Afghan elder speaks during a shura at the Arghandab Joint District Community Center, Dec. 03, 2009. (US Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Francisco V. Govea II) An Afghan girl awaits to receive clothing from US Soldiers from 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry Regiment, Boragay Village, Zabul Province, Afghanistan, Dec. 4, 2009. US Soldiers are conducting a humanitarian relief project , "Bundle-up,” providing Afghan children with shoes, jackets, blankets, scarves, and caps. (US Air Force
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Atlas Part IV
    PART IV 99 DESCRIPTION PART IV OF WATERSHEDS I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED II. AMU DARYA RIVER BASIN III. NORTHERN RIVER BASIN IV. HARIROD-MURGHAB RIVER BASIN V. HILMAND RIVER BASIN VI. KABUL (INDUS) RIVER BASIN VII. NON-DRAINAGE AREAS PICTURE 84 Aerial view of Panjshir Valley in Spring 2003. Parwan, 25 March 2003 100 I. MAP AND STATISTICS BY WATERSHED Part IV of the Watershed Atlas describes the 41 watersheds Graphs 21-32 illustrate the main characteristics on area, popu- defined in Afghanistan, which includes five non-drainage areas lation and landcover of each watershed. Graph 21 shows that (Map 10 and 11). For each watershed, statistics on landcover the Upper Hilmand is the largest watershed in Afghanistan, are presented. These statistics were calculated based on the covering 46,882 sq. km, while the smallest watershed is the FAO 1990/93 landcover maps (Shapefiles), using Arc-View 3.2 Dasht-i Nawur, which covers 1,618 sq. km. Graph 22 shows that software. Graphs on monthly average river discharge curve the largest number of settlements is found in the Upper (long-term average and 1978) are also presented. The data Hilmand watershed. However, Graph 23 shows that the largest source for the hydrological graph is the Hydrological Year Books number of people is found in the Kabul, Sardih wa Ghazni, of the Government of Afghanistan – Ministry of Irrigation, Ghorband wa Panjshir (Shomali plain) and Balkhab watersheds. Water Resources and Environment (MIWRE). The data have Graph 24 shows that the highest population density by far is in been entered by Asian Development Bank and kindly made Kabul watershed, with 276 inhabitants/sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghan Fiber Optic Ring
    Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT) Presentation by MCIT on Afghan Fiber Optic Ring International Conference, “Practical steps towards a knowledge-based economy” and the Seventh session of the SPECA Project Working Group on Knowledge-based Development Dushanbe,Tajikistan, 16-17 June 2015 CONTENTS: OFC CONNECTIVITY OF AFGHANISTAN; SYSTEMS/EQUIPMENT INSTALLED FOR OFC RING BACKBONE NETWORKS OF AFGHANISTAN; OFC NETWORK BANDWIDTH ALLOCATION; ROAD STATUS BETWEEN AFGHANISTAN AND CHINA THROUGH WAKHAN BORDER; ISSUES AND CHALLENGES OFC CONNECTIVITY OF AFGHANISTAN Under OFC Backbone Ring Project of Afghanistan [as funded by the Government under Core Development Budget of Afghanistan], 21 Provincial capitals have been connected and made operational for Broadband connectivity. These Provincial Capital cities/Provinces are as under: Kabul; Jalalabad ; Laghman; Logar; Paktia; Khost ; Paktika; Ghazni; Maidan Wardak; Qalat; Kandahar ; Lashkargah; Heraat ; Maimana ; Sheberghan; Mazaar-e-sharief ; Aibak; Pulekhumri; Kundoz , Parwan and Takhar . Another 04 Provinces will be connected with the Backbone Network in 2015-16, under the World Bank fund: Bamiyan, Badakshan; Kapisa and Kunar; Afghanistan needs (USD 40 Million )funds to connect the remaining 09 Provinces: Farah; Panjsheer; Sarepul; Qalaienow; Zaranj; Daikundi; Chagcharan; Tarinkot and Nuristan. OFC INTERNATIONAL CONNECTIVITY OF AFGHANISTAN. International connectivity has been established with Pakistan at two points – Turkham and Spin Boldak; with Tajikistan at Sherkhan Bandar; with Uzbekistan at Hayratan; with Turkmenistan at Aqina and Turghundi and with Iran at Islam Qala. Due to Security Issues, Ring is not complete due to a Gap in Connectivity between Heraat and Maimana ; Once this Gap is covered, the Backbone will have better Reliability and Redundancy in routing of Traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Dispute Escalating Between Iran and Afghanistan
    Atlantic Council SOUTH ASIA CENTER ISSUE BRIEF Water Dispute Escalating between Iran and Afghanistan AUGUST 2016 FATEMEH AMAN Iran and Afghanistan have no major territorial disputes, unlike Afghanistan and Pakistan or Pakistan and India. However, a festering disagreement over allocation of water from the Helmand River is threatening their relationship as each side suffers from droughts, climate change, and the lack of proper water management. Both countries have continued to build dams and dig wells without environmental surveys, diverted the flow of water, and planted crops not suitable for the changing climate. Without better management and international help, there are likely to be escalating crises. Improving and clarifying existing agreements is also vital. The United States once played a critical role in mediating water disputes between Iran and Afghanistan. It is in the interest of the United States, which is striving to shore up the Afghan government and the region at large, to help resolve disagreements between Iran and Afghanistan over the Helmand and other shared rivers. The Atlantic Council Future Historical context of Iran Initiative aims to Disputes over water between Iran and Afghanistan date to the 1870s galvanize the international when Afghanistan was under British control. A British officer drew community—led by the United States with its global allies the Iran-Afghan border along the main branch of the Helmand River. and partners—to increase the In 1939, the Iranian government of Reza Shah Pahlavi and Mohammad Joint Comprehensive Plan of Zahir Shah’s Afghanistan government signed a treaty on sharing the Action’s chances for success and river’s waters, but the Afghans failed to ratify it.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Most of Afghanistan's River Basins
    Making the Most of Afghanistan’s River Basins Opportunities for Regional Cooperation By Matthew King and Benjamin Sturtewagen www.ewi.info About the Authors Matthew King is an Associate at the EastWest Institute, where he manages Preventive Diplomacy Initiatives. Matthew’s main interest is on motivating preventive action and strengthening the in- ternational conflict prevention architecture. His current work focuses on Central and South Asia, including Afghanistan and Iran, and on advancing regional solutions to prevent violent conflict. He is the head of the secretariat to the Parliamentarians Network for Conflict Prevention and Human Security. He served in the same position for the International Task Force on Preventive Diplomacy (2007–2008). King has worked for EWI since 2004. Before then he worked in the legal profession in Ireland and in the private sector with the Ford Motor Company in the field of change management. He is the author or coauthor of numerous policy briefs and papers, including “New Initiatives on Conflict Prevention and Human Security” (2008), and a contributor to publications, including a chapter on peace in Richard Cuto’s Civic and Political Leadership (Sage, forthcoming). He received his law degree from the University of Wales and holds a master’s in peace and conflict resolution from the Centre for Conflict Resolution at the University of Bradford, in England. Benjamin Sturtewagen is a Project Coordinator at the EastWest Institute’s Regional Security Program. His work focuses on South Asia, including Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iran, and on ways to promote regional security. Benjamin has worked for EWI since April 2006, starting as a Project Assistant in its Conflict Prevention Program and later as Project Coordinator in EWI’s Preventive Diplomacy Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan: Counter Narcotics Law Enforcement
    AFGHANISTAN Counter Narcotics Law Enforcement UNODC Afghanistan Update # 5 Strengthening of Counter Narcotics Law Enforcement Capacities in Afghanistan (Phase-1) TD/AFG/G38 Drug Law Enforcement Interdiction Unit TD/AFG/H10 Strengthening Afghan-Iran Drug border control and cross border cooperation (SAID) TD/AFG/H16 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Country Office for Afghanistan House 49/50, Lane 4, Street 15 Wazir Akbarkhan Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: + 93 (0) 20 30 22 33 Fax: + 873 763 468 836 January 2006 INTRODUCTION The Afghanistan-UNODC Law Enforcement projects have been designed to assist the Afghan law enforcement community in combating both domestic and international drug trafficking. Ongoing projects include the building of a counter narcotics police unit in Kabul and in key provincial locations as well as strengthening the border police capacity to combat the flow of drugs from Afghanistan into Iran. As per the original Bonn agreement the German government has the lead coordination role in rebuilding the national Afghan police structure and the United Kingdom has the lead role in rebuilding and restructuring a national narcotics enforcement program. To accomplish this task UNODC retains a close working relationship with the Afghan government, particularly with the Ministry of Interior, as well as with represantives from Germany, UK, US, and numerous other coalition partners. I. MAIN PROJECT STRATEGIES A. TD/AFG/G38 (Strengthening of Counter Narcotic Law Enforcement Capacities in Afghanistan) This ongoing project which has been funded by the governments of the United Kingdom, Austria, and Japan was developed to assist in building an Afghanistan national narcotics force.
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia's Contribution to Rebuilding Afghanistan
    Estonia’s contribution to rebuilding Afghanistan The civilian component Since 2006, Afghanistan has been one of Estonia's • In Kabul, 32,000 EUR was given to help the priority partner countries for development co- Afghanistan Centre at Kabul University operation. In September 2006, the Estonian Ministry (ACKU) start the construction of new of Foreign Affairs sent its first diplomat to premises for storing their collection of Afghanistan’s Helmand province. In the summer of publications about Afghanistan, which will 2007, the Estonian special mission to Afghanistan give better access to these materials to the moved to Kabul, and in March 2008 an Estonian students and professors of the University. medical expert from the mission was sent to the Lashkar Gah Provincial Reconstruction Team to As important part of the multilateral co-operation focus on the development of the Helmand province’s Estonia has donated funds respectively: health sector. • a total of 38,400 EUR in voluntary donations In 2008, Estonia’s development aid to Afghanistan is to support the UN High Commissioner of three times more than last year, that is currently Refugees (UNHCR) in 2002 and 2003 in 255 600 EUR. Estonia’s development co-operation easing the situation of refugees in projects are focused on Helmand province and Afghanistan. Kabul. • 42,000 EUR toward the fight against • In Helmand, medical equipment with a value narcotics in Afghanistan. The funds went to of 70,500 EUR was given to the pediatric the Counter Narcotics Trust Fund (CNTF) in section provincial hospital (Bost Hospital), in December 2005. co-operation with the Estonian Red Cross, with the goal of improving the quality of • 32,000 EUR to the United Nations Population treatment of children and reducing child Fund (UNFPA) in 2007 for the Afghanistan mortality in the hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Surge and Afghan Local Governance
    UNITeD StateS INSTITUTe of Peace www.usip.org SPeCIAL RePoRT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Frances Z. Brown This report focuses on both the U.S. military’s localized governance, reconstruction, and development projects and U.S. civilian stabilization programming in Afghanistan from 2009 through 2012. Based on interviews with nearly sixty Afghan and international respondents in Kabul, Kandahar, Nangarhar, The U.S. Surge and and Washington, this report finds that the surge has not met its transformative objectives due to three U.S. assumptions that proved unrealistic. It also examines lessons from the U.S. surge’s impacts on local governance that can be applied toward Afghan Local Governance Afghanistan’s upcoming transition. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Lessons for Transition Frances Z. Brown is a 2011–12 International Affairs Fellow with the Council on Foreign Relations and an Afghanistan Fellow at the United States Institute of Peace. She has worked in and on Summary Afghanistan since 2004, and her previous jobs included roles with the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit and the • The U.S. military and civilian surge into Afghanistan starting in late 2009 aimed to stabilize United States Agency for International Development. She holds the country through interconnected security, governance, and development initiatives. an MA from Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International • Despite policymakers’ claims that their goals for Afghan governance were “modest,” the Studies and a BA from Yale University. The views in this report surge’s stated objectives amounted to a transformation of the subnational governance are solely her own and do not reflect the views of the U.S.
    [Show full text]