Indoor Air Quality Assessment
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
INDOOR AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT Boxford Town Library 10 Elm Street Boxford, Massachusetts Prepared by: Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Indoor Air Quality Program September 2014 Background/Introduction At the request of Alan Benson, Boxford Town Administrator, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH), Bureau of Environmental Health (BEH) provided assistance and consultation at the Boxford Town Library (BTL), 10 Elm Street, Boxford, Massachusetts. On July 25, 2014, a visit was made to the BTL by Michael Feeney, Director of BEH’s Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Program, and Jason Dustin, Environmental Analyst/Inspector within BEH’s IAQ Program. The assessment was prompted by employee concerns, associated with mold, odors, and general indoor air quality. During the assessment, BEH/IAQ staff were accompanied by John Dold, Superintendent of Public Works/Town Engineer, Boxford Department of Public Works, and Ms. Patti Ditullio, Library Director. The BTL is a two-story wood building constructed in 1843. An addition was built in 1979. The original building has a field stone foundation with a dirt floor. The addition was constructed partially on a cement slab as well as a poured cement foundation/floor. A sump pump is installed in the floor of the addition’s basement. The original portion of the BTL has undergone significant interior renovations, likely when the addition was constructed in 1979. Renovations included replacing the original horse- hair plaster walls with gypsum wallboard (GW). Most recent renovations to the entire building complex consisted of removing portions of water-damaged GW, mold remediation, painting and the installation of new carpet tile. It was reported to BEH/IAQ staff that a new roof was installed approximately 4 years ago. The second floor contains administrative offices and an employee kitchen/break room. The first floor (main floor) contains the circulation desk, open stack areas, restroom, media room, reference room, children’s area and computer stations. 2 Methods Air tests for carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, temperature, and relative humidity were taken with the TSI, Q-Trak, IAQ Monitor 7565. Air tests for airborne particle matter with a diameter less than 2.5 micrometers were taken with the TSI, DUSTTRAK™ Aerosol Monitor Model 8520. BEH/IAQ staff also performed a visual inspection of building materials for water damage and/or microbial growth. Results The library has 8 full time employees and several volunteers. The BTL typically serves up to 125 visitors on a daily basis. Tests were taken during normal operations. Results appear in Table 1. Discussion Ventilation It can be seen that carbon dioxide levels were below 800 parts per million (ppm) in 10 of 11 areas, indicating adequate air exchange in the majority of areas surveyed at the time of the assessment (Table 1). It should be noted, however, that many areas were sparsely populated at the time of assessment. With increased occupancy, carbon dioxide levels would be expected to be higher. The BTL does not have mechanical ventilation that introduces fresh/outside air into the building or exhausts stale air from occupied spaces; the system heats and recirculates only. The 3 restroom in the main library has a local exhaust fan that only operates when the light switch is activated. The use of openable windows is the sole means of providing fresh air to the building. The BTL is heated by two gas-fired forced hot air (FHA) furnace units. It appears that the FHA unit located in the attic (Picture 1) serves the main library (1979 addition), and the FHA unit located in the basement (Picture 2) serves the original 1843 building. As mentioned, these units provide heating but do not introduce fresh air. Air from occupant spaces is drawn into return grates (Picture 3) and ducted to the FHA units located in the attic or basement. The air is filtered, heated, and re-circulated back to ducted supply diffusers (Picture 4). The BTL is cooled using window air conditioning (AC) units that are located throughout the building (Table 1). Minimum design ventilation rates are mandated by the Massachusetts State Building Code (MSBC). Until 2011, the minimum ventilation rate in Massachusetts was higher for both occupied office spaces and general classrooms, with similar requirements for other occupied spaces (BOCA, 1993). The current version of the MSBC, promulgated in 2011 by the State Board of Building Regulations and Standards (SBBRS), adopted the 2009 International Mechanical Code (IMC) to set minimum ventilation rates. Please note that the MSBC is a minimum standard that is not health-based. At lower rates of cubic feet per minute (cfm) per occupant of fresh air, carbon dioxide levels would be expected to rise significantly. A ventilation rate of 20 cfm per occupant of fresh air provides optimal air exchange resulting in carbon dioxide levels at or below 800 ppm in the indoor environment in each area measured. MDPH recommends that carbon dioxide levels be maintained at 800 ppm or below. This is because most environmental and occupational health scientists involved with research on IAQ and health effects have documented significant increases in indoor air quality complaints and/or health effects when carbon dioxide levels rise above the MDPH guidelines of 800 ppm for 4 schools, office buildings and other occupied spaces (Sundell et al., 2011). The ventilation must be on at all times that the room is occupied. Providing adequate fresh air ventilation with open windows and maintaining the temperature in the comfort range during the cold weather season is impractical. Mechanical ventilation is usually required to provide adequate fresh air ventilation. Carbon dioxide is not a problem in and of itself. It is used as an indicator of the adequacy of the fresh air ventilation. As carbon dioxide levels rise, it indicates that the ventilating system is malfunctioning or the design occupancy of the room is being exceeded. When this happens, a buildup of common indoor air pollutants can occur, leading to discomfort or health complaints. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standard for carbon dioxide is 5,000 parts per million parts of air (ppm). Workers may be exposed to this level for 40 hours/week, based on a time-weighted average (OSHA, 1997). The MDPH uses a guideline of 800 ppm for publicly occupied buildings. A guideline of 600 ppm or less is preferred in schools due to the fact that the majority of occupants are young and considered to be a more sensitive population in the evaluation of environmental health status. Inadequate ventilation and/or elevated temperatures are major causes of complaints such as respiratory, eye, nose and throat irritation, lethargy and headaches. For more information concerning carbon dioxide, please see Appendix A. Indoor temperature measurements at the time of the assessment ranged from 74°F to 77°F (Table 1), which were within the MDPH recommended comfort range. The MDPH recommends that indoor air temperatures be maintained in a range of 70°F to 78°F in order to provide for the comfort of building occupants. In many cases concerning indoor air quality, fluctuations of temperature in occupied spaces are typically experienced, even in a building with an adequate fresh air supply. 5 Indoor relative humidity measurements at the time of the assessment ranged from 46 to 55 percent (Table 1), which were within the MDPH recommended comfort range. The MDPH recommends a comfort range of 40 to 60 percent for indoor air relative humidity. Humidity levels in the building would be expected to drop during the heating season. The sensation of dryness and irritation is common in a low relative humidity environment. Low relative humidity is a very common problem during the heating season in the northeast part of the United States. Microbial/Moisture Concerns In order to become colonized with mold, a material must be exposed to water and remain moist. If sufficiently moistened, porous materials such as GW can support mold growth (US EPA, 2001). In addition, relative humidity in excess of 70 percent for extended periods of time can provide an environment for mold and fungal growth in building materials (ASHRAE, 1989). For storage and handling of paper, parchment, and leather (e.g., books), relative humidity below 55 percent is recommended (Wilson, 1995). The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) recommend that porous materials (e.g., carpeting, gypsum wallboard) be dried with fans and heating within 24 to 48 hours of becoming wet (US EPA, 2001; ACGIH, 1989). If not dried within this time frame, mold growth may occur. Once mold has colonized porous materials, they are difficult to clean and should be removed/discarded. It was reported to BEH/IAQ staff that several areas of the BTL previously identified as having water damage/mold were remediated from November 2013 to February 2014. According to Mr. Dold, water-damaged materials were removed and discarded at that time. Affected areas were treated with an anti-microbial agent and building materials (GW and carpet) were replaced. 6 The areas were then freshly painted. In addition, air ducts for the FHA units were cleaned due to reported mold within the ducts (Picture 5). It should be noted that the areas remediated for water damage/mold were not confined to a single area. First and second floor areas in both the original building and the 1979 addition were reported to have experienced water damage/mold growth. It is important to note that although it appears that the water damage/mold remediation was completed properly, little has been done to address the sources of water penetration. If the source of water exposure has not been not addressed, water damage and microbial growth will persist.