DOCSLIB.ORG

FACTORS INFLUENCING EUROPEAN CORN BORER POPULATIONS in OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FACTORS INFLUENCING EUROPEAN CORN BORER POPULATIONS in OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement FACTORS INFLUENCING EUROPEAN CORN BORER POPULATIONS IN OHIO DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By MOHAMED TAHIR KIRA, B. Sc., M. Sc. ****** The Ohio State University 1958 Approved by: jffj Adviser Department of Zoology and Entomology ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my thanks to Dr. D. M. DeLong, Dr. C. R. Neiswander, and to Dr. L. H. Rolston for their helpful super­ vision, suggestions, and criticisms in the preparation of this dissertation. Special thanks are also due to W. D. Guthrie for furnishing the corn borer egg masses required for this experi­ ment and for helping in obtaining the data presented herein; to C. C. King for his continuous and valuable service in all phases of this problem. The contributions of C. A, Triplehorn and the Statistical Laboratory at Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station were greatly appreciated. I am grateful to Mrs, Hilda Lea for typing the dissertation and to Glenn Berkey and Clarke Robey for their photographic contributions. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION. .. ...... 1 REVIEW OF LITERATURE. ....... .... 3 Factors Influencing European Corn Borer Populations . 3 Natural Enemies and the Borer Populations ...... 9 Arthropods . ..................... 9 Enemies other than arthropods. ......... 11 Effect of Corn Resistance or Susceptibility on Borer Populations . 11 Effect of Planting Date on Borer Populations. .... 19 The Damage Done by Borer. .......... 26 PROCEDURES AND TECHNIQUE. .... ......... 35 Preparing the Field of Experiment................... 35 Plot Layout ............... .. Planting and Maintaining the Corn Plants............. 40 Artificial Infestation............ *f0 Hand application................. ^0 Laboratory production of corn borer egg masses . k2. Sampling and Data Recorded. ...... kk RESULTS . k9 Effect of Resistance and Susceptibility on European Corn Borer Populations. ................. 51 First Generation Population. .......... 51 Natural oviposition ....................... 51 Larval establishment and rate of development 55 Page Summer population. ..... 62 Fall Population . » . •• . .. 66 Effect of Date of Planting on European Corn Borer Populations. .............. ...... 71 First Generation Population . .... , * 71 Natural oviposition. 71 Larval establishment and rate of development 72 Summer Population . 78 Fall Population . 79 Combined Effect of Corn Hybrids and Planting Dates on European Corn Borer Populations ....... 8l First Generation Population ..... .......... 8l Fall Population and Second Generation . 90 Damage Done by the European Corn Borer ........ 100 Burrows and Leaf Lesions. .......... 101 Yield • . .. • • . • * . •• 110 SUMMARY. ......................... Il8 APPENDIX . ........................ 120 LITERATURE CITED . ..................... 132 AUTOBIOGRAPHY. ...................... 136 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Showing borer population per hundred stalks for all varieties and each planting date, 1926. , and 192*7 $ * • • • * • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • « 2Q 2. Yield of susceptible and resistant varieties. early planted treatment 4 compared with treatment 1. 31 3. Yield of.susceptible and resistant varieties late planted treatment 4 compared with treatment 1. 32 4. Reduction in growth of susceptible plants as a result of borer infestation. Early planting. 33 5 . Reduction in yield of susceptible plants by borer attack............................... • . * 34 6. First generation egg masses by hybrid^ x planting date « . • . •... .. ... « • 32 7» Firsts generation egg masses in hybrids within dates of planting ........................... .. • 53 8. Larval establishment and rate of development in hybrids within dates of planting. Treatment 2. 58 9 . Larval establishment and rate of development in hybrids within dates ofplanting. Treatment 4. 59 10. Midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 63 11. Number of first generation borers in hybrids within dates of planting. .. 64 12. First generation pupae in hybrids within dates of planting. ........ 65 13. Fall population. Analysis of variance. 67 14. Fall dissection. Borer population in hybrids within planting dates. .............. 68 15. First generation egg masses in date of planting within hybrids ........... 72 v Table Page 16. Rate of larval development on early and late plants within hybrids. Treatment 2 . 76 17. Rate of larval development on early and late plants within hybrids. Treatment . 77 18.‘ Number of first generation borers in dates of planting xd.th.in hybrids. ............. 78 19. First generation pupae in dates of planting within hybrids * . 79 20. Fall population in dates of planting within hybrids. ..................... 80 21. Rate of larval development in hybrids and piantang date... * • ... «« . .. 82 22. Comparison of larval establishment in treat­ ments 2 , 3 ? and ................ ^5 23. First generation population by hybrids and planting dates .................. 88 2.k. First generation poioulation by treatment in hybrids and planting dates , . 88 25. First generation pupae in hybrids and date of planting ............ 90 26. Fall population. No. of larvae by hybrids and planting dates . ................ 92 27* Fall population. Ho. of larvae within hybrids and dates of planting. .............. 93: 28. Fall population. Ho. of larvae by hybrids and planting dates ••••••••••■■•••»• 93 29* Fall population. Ho, of larvae in hybrids of each planting date in all treatments ....... 93 30. Second generation larval populations. .... 96 31. First generation borer population in treatments 3 and 8 ............ 98 32. Estimate of 1956 second generation larvae on treatment 3» • • ................ 99 vi Table Page 33. First generation borers, burrows, and leaf lesions, in hybrids of each planting date........ 102 34. No. of burrows and leaf lesions in hybrids within date of planting.:(1st generation damage) . 105 35. Ho. of burrows and leaf lesions in dates of planting within hybrids.(1st generation damage). 106 36. No. of burrows in hybrids within dates of planting. (Second generation damage). ....... 107 37* Ho. of burrows in dates of planting within hybrids. (Second generation damage) ........ 108 38. Comparison between first and second generation damage............ ..... 109 39. Effect of first generation infestation on infestation by second generation borers ....... 110 k-0. Yield by treatment within hybrids and dates of planting. .... ... Ill kl. Yield for both hybrids and planting dates. 11^- Comparison between reduction in yield of treat­ ments 3 , 6 , and 8 of both hybrids of the early planting. ................. .......................116 vii LIST OF'APPENDIX. TABLES Table Page 1 . Borers, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance• 1956•• • • • • .. • • ... .. 120 2 . Burrows, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 1956. ............ 121 3 . Leaf lesions, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 1 9 5 6 ........... .. • • • •.... 122 k. Borers, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 1957* • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 123 5 . Burrows, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 1957** • • • • • • • •• * •• . 12^ 6 . Leaf lesions, midsummer dissection. Analysis of variance. 1957 • • • • • ............. 125 7. Larvae, fall dissection. Analysis of variance. 1956. .................. 126 8 . Burrows, fall dissection. Analysis of variance. 1956. .......... • 127 9. Larvae, fall dissection. Analysis of variance. 1957. ............... 128 10. .Burrows, fall dissection.. Analysis.of variance. 1957................................................... 129 11. Yield. Analysis of variance. 1956............. 130 12. Yield. Analysis of variance. 1957* * ......... 131 viii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. First generation natural oviposition on hybrids within dates of planting. 5^ 2 . Effect of resistance and susceptibility on larval establishment. Treatments 2 and A- . 60 3. First, generation natural egg deposition on early and late plantings within hybrids .......... 73 k. Larval establishment on early and late, plantings. Treatments 2 and .............. 75 5» First generation population in hybrids and dates of planting. ....... ... 91 6 . Fall population. No. of larvae by hybrids and dates, of planting. ........................... 9% 7. Second generation population by hybrids and dates of planting. 97 8 . First generation borers, burrows, and lesions in hybrids of each planting date. Treatments. 103 9. First generation borers, burrows, and lesions in hybrids of each planting date. Treatment 4. ..... 104 ix INTRODUCTION The great importance of corn production in many parts of the world has made the ultimate economic effect of the European corn borer, Pyrausta nubilalis (Ebn.), of great concern to the growers of this crop. Differences in the responses of plant varieties to insect attack and the interrelations of plants and insects have been on record for more than a hundred years. Con­ siderable variation was found in the populations of corn borer on different varieties planted on different dates. Apart from the effect of corn hybrids and their planting dates, a complex of Other factors has its effect on borer population as well as other biological populations. These factors are: 1. Physical factors of the environment which could be changes in weather. 2. The genetic characteristics of the host, morphological or physiological, the host abundance, and the agronomic procedu­ res such as time of planting (synchronization), and soil con­ ditions. 3. Biotic factors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Corn Borer, Ostrinia Nubilalis (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Crambidae)1 John L
    EENY156 European Corn Borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Crambidae)1 John L. Capinera2 Distribution flights and oviposition typically occur in May, late June, and August. In locations with four generations, adults are active First found in North America near Boston, Massachusetts in April, June, July, and August-September. in 1917, European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), now has spread as far west as the Rocky Mountains in both Egg Canada and the United States, and south to the Gulf Coast Eggs are deposited in irregular clusters of about 15 to 20. states. European corn borer is thought to have originated in The eggs are oval, flattened, and creamy white in color, Europe, where it is widespread. It also occurs in northern usually with an iridescent appearance. The eggs darken Africa. The North American European corn borer popula- to a beige or orangish tan color with age. Eggs normally tion is thought to have resulted from multiple introductions are deposited on the underside of leaves, and overlap like from more than one area of Europe. Thus, there are at least shingles on a roof or fish scales. Eggs measure about 1.0 two, and possibly more, strains present. This species occurs mm in length and 0.75 m in width. The developmental infrequently in Florida. threshold for eggs is about 15°C. Eggs hatch in four to nine days. Life Cycle and Description The number of generations varies from one to four, with only one generation occurring in northern New England and Minnesota and in northern areas of Canada, whereas three to four generations occur in Virginia and other southern locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Colleen Stiefel Week 1
    89--017 AVIAN INVESTIGAgION OF WARDS GROVE NATURE PRESERVE WITH EMPHASIS'. ON AREA SENSITIVE SPECIES by : COLLEEN STIEFEL WEEK 1 ;' .k, May 29-t ' .j89 ; 0530-0900 ; Plot C ; Cloudy, light & variable wino temp . 55-65 degrees . May 0, 1989 ; 0530-0845 ; Plot A ; Light & variable winds, humid & sticky ; temp. 70-80 degrees ;•: to windy to bird Plot B as wands became stronger, later that morning June 2, 1989,. : '0,57,5-0830 ; . Plot Br Cloudy, then cleared up . NW winds t`5-7 m .p .h . WEEK 2 ; June 7, 1989 ; 0500-0830 ; Plot B ; Light variable,, winds, sunny, cool ; . temp .-55-60 degrees . June 10, 1989 ; 0500-1030 ; Plots .A & C ; east winds . temp . '55' degrees-..' WEEK 3 ; June 15, 1989 ; 0510-1030 ; Plots C & B ; NW winds @ 5-7 m .p .h . overcast & colds 48 degrees . June 16, 1989 ; 0515-1030 ; Plot B finished, and Plot A done . Light NW winds, partly cloudy, turned . sunny ; temp . 5o de- grees . WEEK 4 ; June 19, 1989 ; 0500-1030 ; Plot C & B ; No wind, warmed up very quickly, temp . 50 degrees . June 21, 1989 ; 0515-0830 ; Plot A ; South wind, 7 m .p .h . humid & sunny, 68 degrees . WEEK 5 ; June 26, 1989 ; 0500-0545, extremely foggy, waited until 0600 to bird to 1030 ; Plots A & B ; No wind, 62 degrees . June 28, 1989 ; 0510-1000 ; Plots B (finished) & C ; no wind sunny, 58 degrees . WEEK 6 ; July 5, 1989 ; 0500-0850 ; Plot C ; No winds, hot, humid . 67-85 degrees . Yuk . 9 ; 0530-0900 ; Plot B ; Humid and s ' , and hot .
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Damage Manag Ement Department of Entomology �
    PURDUE EXTENSION ADM-5-W Animal Damage Manag ement Department of Entomology � WOODPECKERS Judy Loven, USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services IDENTIFICATION There are 21 species of woodpeckers found in the Unit- ed States, seven of which are present in Indiana. Year-round Indiana woodpeckers include the downy (63/4" in length), hairy (91/4"), red-headed (91/4"), red-bellied (91/4"), pileated (161/2") woodpeckers and the northern flicker (121/2"). The yellow-bellied sapsucker (73/4") is a resident of Indiana dur- ing the winter months. Woodpeckers have short legs with two sharp-clawed toes forward and two backward -pointed toes. These toes, along with their stiff tail feathers, allow them to cling to trees, utility poles, or wood siding. Their strong, pointed beak is used for digging insects from trees, excavating nesting cavi- ties, and for “drumming.” Since woodpeckers do not have true “songs,” they use sharp calls and perform rhythmic tap- ping (better known as drumming) with their beaks on sur- faces such as dead tree limbs, metal poles, and building sid- Figure 1a. Downy woodpecker (Photo Credit: C. Chevalier, ing to attract a mate or announce their territorial boundaries. USDA Forest Service) Both male and female woodpeckers drum. It is primarily this drumming behavior that may cause serious problems for ho- meowners. The downy (Figure 1a) and the hairy (Figure 1b) wood- peckers cause the most damage in Indiana. Both are identi- fied by their white backs and black and white striped wing feathers. The downy is sparrow-size and has a short bill. The ADULT WEIGHT: DOWNY: 0.74 OUNCE, HAIRY: 1.41-3.35 OUNCES, PILEATED: 8.83-12.36 OUNCES TOTAL LENGTH: DOWNY: 6 3/4 INCHES, HAIRY: 9 1/4 INCHES, PILEATED: 16 1/2 INCHES COLOR: RED, WHITE, AND BLACK INCUBATION/ DOWNY: 11-12 DAYS/20-25 DAYS, FLEDGING: HAIRY: 11-15 DAYS/28-30 DAYS, PILEATED: 15-18 DAYS/26-28 DAYS BROODS/EGGS: DOWNY: 1/3-5, HAIRY: 1/3-6, PILEATED: 1/3-5 Figure 1b.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy of Picoides Pubescens (Downy Woodpecker) from the Pacific Northwest M
    TAXONOMY OF PICOIDES PUBESCENS (DOWNY WOODPECKER) FROM THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST M. RALPH BROWNING1 A b s t r a c t . — Three subspecies of Picoides pubescens (Downy Woodpecker) are currently recognized in the Pacific Northwest (Peters 1948; American Ornithologists’ Union [A.O.U.] 1957; Short 1982; Winkler et al. 1995): gairdnerii Audubon, 1839 (type locality: no locality given = Fort Vancouver, WA; but see beyond) from southwestern British Columbia to western Washington, Oregon, and Mendocino County in northwest­ ern California; turati Malherbe, 1860 (near Monterey, CA ) from north-central Washing­ ton to central Oregon and north-central interior and humid coastal California; and leucurus Hartlaub, 1852 (Rocky Mountains) from the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska, to British Colum­ bia east of the coastal mountains, eastern Washington and Oregon, northeastern Califor­ nia, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico, east to Montana, and Nebraska. The subspecies gairdnerii has been characterized as darker below than other subspecies, with the wing coverts unspotted (Short 1982) or with the coverts mostly un­ spotted (Winkler et al. 1995). However, almost all birds from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, and many from the southern parts of the range of gairdnerii have white spots on the tertials and coverts. The presence of tertial spots on specimens from southern Vancouver Island is a character ascribed to P. p. fum idus, an unrecognized (A.O.U. 1890) subspecies proposed by Maynard (1889). Specimens of gairdnerii, compared with turati, are said to be larger (Winkler et al. 1995) and by as much as 5–8% (Short 1982), but the elements used for size comparisons by these authors was not indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey Selection of Cooper's Hawks (Accipiter Cooperii)
    Aaron N. K. Haiman Cooper’s Hawk Diet 8-May-2006 Prey Selection of Cooper’s Hawks (Accipiter cooperii) Nesting in Urban Areas of Berkeley and Albany, California Aaron N. K. Haiman Abstract The Cooper’s Hawk is one of the few species of top predators that can persist in urban areas. Little is known, however, on the dynamics between urbanization and the species that adapt and persist in these areas. One requirement for the survival of Cooper’s Hawks in urban areas is prey availability. To determine the prey species of the Cooper’s Hawk in the urban areas of Berkeley and Albany California, I analyzed the previously identified 579 prey remains of the 2002 breeding season. To this dataset I added the 478 prey remains collected from Cooper’s Hawk nest sites during the 2003 breeding season which had not been identified. In 2002, 16 species of bird and 3 species of mammal were found. In 2003, 20 species of bird and 1 species of mammal were found. Of these species, Rock Dove, Mourning Dove, and American Robin comprised ~80% of the biomass of their diet. The percentage of non-native biomass of the diet was higher, on average, in more urban nests (~65%) than in park nests (~25%). Most of this biomass was brought to the nest in the mid-section of the breeding season. Determining how the Cooper’s Hawk is able to survive and reproduce in such close proximity to human activity and disturbance can lead to better management decisions with respect to this species and others in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • MF2648 Birds of Kansas Streamside Forests
    Birds of Kansas Streamside Forests Nature’s Winged Legacy Birds that inhabit forests in eastern Kansas include: Eastern Kansas hosts a variety of bird life. Much of it Hairy Woodpecker can be found along the forested waterways that connect the Pileated Woodpecker tallgrass prairie, crop fields, and towns. More than 100 bird Broad-winged Hawk species use the streamside forests and other woodlands in Red-shouldered Hawk Riley County alone. Birds depend on these riparian forests for nesting and raising young, as stopover habitat during Barred Owl migration, or a winter haven. Wood Duck Wood Thrush Landowners and managers play an important Yellow-throated Vireo role in conserving nature’s winged legacy. This Scarlet Tanager publication describes features of streamside forests that are important to particular species of Red-eyed Vireo birds. It suggests ways to manage stream Blue-gray Gnatcatcher corridors for healthy bird populations. Northern Parula Practices to promote bird life fit with those Kentucky Warbler for managing streamsides for conservation Black-and-white Warbler purposes such as soil and streambank Ovenbird stabilization, improved water quality, timber and firewood production, natural scenery, and fish and Black-billed Cuckoo wildlife habitat. The following information is provided Eastern Whip-poor-will to help landowners determine how well their streamside forests benefit birds and to find support for habitat Forest Age and Condition restoration and improvement projects. Mature forests with full-size, seed- and fruit-producing trees are important to some species, usually for adequate Forest Size and Continuity food supply, nesting sites, and cover. Species associated with Birds may prefer or require forest tracts of 50 acres mature forests: or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodpeckers NOTE: There Are Many Types of Birds Related to Woodpeckers (200+ Species)
    Woodpeckers NOTE: There are many types of birds related to woodpeckers (200+ species). This page is about Woodpeckers - the birds most often associated with property damage. Scientific Classification: Animalia, Chordata, Aves, Neornithes, Neognathae; Neoaves; Piciformes, Pici, Picidae (sub: wrynecks, piculets). Bird Size & Markings: Woodpecker sizes vary. The giant Piliated Woodpecker can be 22” long and have a 33” wing span. The small Downy Woodpecker is 5” long with a 10” wing span. Markings vary widely. Dark plumage is often irides- cent while head and chest markings are often bright white, red or yellow. ALL Woodpeckers have long, strong bills for drilling into or drumming on trees. Habitat: In general, woodpeckers live in wooded or forested habitats. Some are migratory while others stay in the same area all year. They can inhabit man made objects made of wood or soft materials (EIFS, drywall, plywood, shingles, etc). Nesting/Dens: Woodpecker nests almost always consist of holes excavated in wood or soft materials. They lay between 2 and 5 eggs for each brood. Each Woodpeckers vary in both size and markings. brood fledges after 3 to 4 weeks. The Piliated Woodpecker (shown above) is large for a Woodpecker with a 33” wing span. Food: Woodpeckers are omnivorous - while they prefer insects, they can also eat nuts, grain, fruit and seed or suet. They are often drawn to bird feeders with the addition of suet, peanuts and some grains. Impact on Human Health: Inhabitation can lead to bird mite infestations. Most of the time, Woodpeckers are solitary and do not accumulate bird waste in large quantities like other social species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hairy Woodpecker (Picoides Villosus) Emma Pitcher & Anna Kornoelje
    Hairy Woodpecker (Picoides villosus) Emma Pitcher & Anna Kornoelje Whitefish Point Bird Observatory, Chippewa Co., MI (Click to view a comparison of Atlas I to II) April, 2006 © Al Menk The Hairy Woodpecker is a familiar mottled of forests. It will also nest in wooded suburban areas and mature wooded riparian corridors black and white resident of woodlands all across (Jackson et al. 2002). Further, research shows North and Central America. This woodpecker is that Hairy Woodpecker population densities just slightly larger than its look-alike, the increase between one and five years after the Downy Woodpecker and, like the smaller bird, occurrence of forest fires (Hobson and Shieck the male has a small red patch on the back of his 1999, Saab et al. 2007). Fruits, seeds and pine head. Although this woodpecker is one of the cone seeds are also choice food items, as well as most geographically variable species, the Hairy sunflower seeds and suet at feeders (Jackson et Woodpecker can also be identified by its bill al. 2002). Small, round nest entrance holes may which is larger and heavier than the Downy’s. be as high as 18 meters above ground and can Compared with the Downy, its call is louder. be easily missed in a dim forest (Eaton 1914, The Hairy has a characteristic, straight, graceful, Bull 1974). The adult’s familiar drumming is bounding flight, and uses its tail as a prop when steady, more rapid and with longer pauses excavating its nest hole. Hairy Woodpeckers are between bursts than the drumming of Downy easy to observe at feeders, although away from Woodpeckers (Jackson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History and Differentiation in the Yellow-Bellied Sapsucker
    THE CONDOR , VOLUME 54 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER, 1952 NUMBER 5 NATURAL HISTORY AND DIFFERENTIATION IN THE YELLOW-BELLIED SAPSUCKER By THOMAS R. HOWELL INTRODUCTION The Yellow-bellied Sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius) is a speciesof woodpecker sub- divided into strongly characterized geographic races that are clearly distinguishable even in the field and which differ markedly in the extent of interbreeding where their ranges meet. The purpose of this investigation has been the analysis of the differentia- tion in the group as it approaches the specieslevel. Between some races of sapsuckersthere is free interbreeding, whereas between other; it is so rare that reproductive isolation is almost complete, even though physical and ecological barriers, if present, seem no greater than where intermixture ,takes place. The speciesis also peculiar in that sexual dimorphism in color is distinct in one race whereas it is completely lacking in another. Similarly, the races vary from highly migratory to practically sedentary. These rather unusual features, coupled with the fact that most of the zones of contact are limited and relatively accessible, make the Yellow-bellied Sapsuckersan excellent subject for the study of morphological variation in combination with field studies on the breeding behavior of the races at the points of junction. The latter topic was especially emphasized, for despite the fact that specimens showing intermediate characters have been known for almost a hundred years, no mixed pairs had ever been reported and no data published on the viability and fertility of the inter- mediates. I have also attempted, insofar as the meager evidence permits, to determine the genetic, environmental, and historical factors which may have influenced the evolu- tion of the forms within this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Bird Highlights 2012
    Winter Bird Highlights FROM PROJECT FEEDERWAtch 2011–12 cience • Volume 8 Volume • cience s itizen c Focus on Focus s we look back at the 2011–12 season of Focus on Citizen Science is a publication highlight- ing the contributions of citizen scientists. This is- FeederWatch, we’re also taking the opportu- sue, Winter Bird Highlights 2012, is brought to you by Project FeederWatch, a research and education proj- nity to reflect on the first 25 years of the proj- ect of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Bird Studies A Canada. Project FeederWatch is made possible by the ect. Much has changed in our backyard bird communi- efforts and support of thousands of citizen scientists. ties, and so it should. Each calendar year represents a Project FeederWatch Staff generation for the species we see at our feeders. The David Bonter birds visiting today may be 24 generations removed Project Leader, USA Janis Dickinson from the birds enjoyed and observed by the partici- Director of Citizen Science, USA Kristine Dobney pants in FeederWatch during the inaugural season! Project Assistant, Canada The world is changing quickly, and birds are feeling Wesley Hochachka Senior Research Associate, USA the impact. Who would have thought that the gregari- Anne Marie Johnson ous and common Evening Grosbeak would disappear Project Assistant, USA Rosie Kirton from our feeders? We certainly could not have imag- Project Support, Canada ined that the Eurasian Collared-Dove, a species barely Denis Lepage Senior Scientist, Canada found in North America when FeederWatch began, Susan E. Newman would spread from coast to coast and now be a dom- Project Assistant, USA Kerrie Wilcox inant actor in the dramas that play out in backyards Project Leader, Canada from Florida to Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Breeding Season Behavior of Downy Woodpeckers
    EARLY BREEDING SEASON BEHAVIOR OF DOWNY WOODPECKERS LAWRENCE KILHAM The present report is one in a series on my studies of the year-round behavior of Downy Woodpeckers (Dendrocopos pubescens), done with an idea that it is only against a background of the total natural history of a species that selection pressures operative in its evolution are likely to be understood. My previous reports on D. pubescens have included winter and sexual differences in feeding, copulatory behavior as related to courtship, and a preliminary one on the entire breeding season that gives descriptions of the main vocalizations and displays (Kilham, 1962, 1970, 1974). Present observations, made in Lyme, New Hampshire between 1961 and 1974, supple- ment the 1962 report. Other accounts on the behavior of this species include those of Bent (1939)) Staebler (1949)) Lawrence (1967)) and Short (1971)) the last giving details of the displays of various species of the genus Den- drocopos, which in his terminology is called Picoides. Although the various aspects of early breeding season behavior take place concurrently, for convenience I have divided them into: agonistic and ter- ritorial behavior as seen in winter and spring; types of drumming; courtship flights; the search for a nest site; and finally the dependence of successful courtship and nesting on an adequate environment. AGONISTIC AND TERRITORIAL BEHAVIOR DispZacings.-The following descriptions of fall and winter interactions between the sexes are given by way of background to those seen in the early breeding season. Thus on 26 September 1968 a male displaced a female five times in 15 min, and a month later another male displaced a female four times in less than 10 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Bird Highlights 2010
    Supplement to Living Bird Winter Bird Highlights From Project FeederWatch 2009–10 cience • Volume 6 Volume cience • s itizen c Focus on Focus on Citizen Science is a publication highlight- he days are becoming shorter, the nights cool- ing the contributions of citizen scientists. This issue, Winter Bird Highlights 2010, is brought to you by Project er, and the birds are settling into their winter FeederWatch, a research and education project of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology and Bird Studies Canada. territories—a new season of FeederWatch is Project FeederWatch is made possible by the efforts and T support of thousands of citizen scientists. upon us. As author Edward Kanze wrote, “The good Project FeederWatch Staff naturalist knows there’s always more to discover— David Bonter birds that defy the range maps and flit in from afar, Project Leader, USA Janis Dickinson birds with unfamiliar plumages, albino birds, partial Director of Citizen Science, USA Kristine Dobney albinos, birds that belt out songs different from those Project Assistant, Canada Wesley Hochachka they’re supposed to sing, and familiar birds that be- Senior Research Associate, USA have in ways that surprise you. Keep your eyes peeled Anne Marie Johnson Project Assistant, USA and your ears clear.”* Before looking forward to the Rosie Kirton Project Support, Canada new season, let’s take one last look back at the winter Denis Lepage of 2009–10. Senior Scientist, Canada Genna Knight *Kanze, E. 2006. Over the Mountain and Home Again: Journeys of an Adirondack Project Assistant, USA Naturalist, N.K. Burns Publishing. Kerrie Wilcox Project Leader, Canada Benjamin Zuckerberg 2009–10 Research Associate, USA FeederWatch season statistics Join Project FeederWatch! Anyone in the United States and Canada with an interest in birds and a feeder to watch is welcome to join.
    [Show full text]