DOCSLIB.ORG

An Overview of Brucellosis in Cattle and Humans, and Its Serological and Molecular Diagnosis in Control Strategies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Overview of Brucellosis in Cattle and Humans, and Its Serological and Molecular Diagnosis in Control Strategies Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Review An Overview of Brucellosis in Cattle and Humans, and its Serological and Molecular Diagnosis in Control Strategies Muhammad Zahoor Khan 1 and Muhammad Zahoor 2,* 1 Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien, 90372 Oslo, Norway * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +47-97-17-8583 Received: 28 April 2018; Accepted: 9 June 2018; Published: 14 June 2018 Abstract: Brucellosis is one of the most common contagious and communicable zoonotic diseases with high rates of morbidity and lifetime sterility. There has been a momentous increase over the recent years in intra/interspecific infection rates, due to poor management and limited resources, especially in developing countries. Abortion in the last trimester is a predominant sign, followed by reduced milk yield and high temperature in cattle, while in humans it is characterized by undulant fever, general malaise, and arthritis. While the clinical picture of brucellosis in humans and cattle is not clear and often misleading with the classical serological diagnosis, efforts have been made to overcome the limitations of current serological assays through the development of PCR-based diagnosis. Due to its complex nature, brucellosis remains a serious threat to public health and livestock in developing countries. In this review, we summarized the recent literature, significant advancements, and challenges in the treatment and vaccination against brucellosis, with a special focus on developing countries. Keywords: brucellosis; cattle; human; serological and molecular methods 1. Introduction Brucellosis is thought to have been identified in the late Roman era, named because of its resemblance to the organism Brucellae (later called Brucella) from carbonized cheese. Brucellosis has been associated with military campaigns, predominantly in the Mediterranean region. The disease was first expounded by Sir David Bruce, Hughes, and Zammit while working in Malta; hence the name ‘Malta fever’ is occasionally used for typical fever conditions caused by Brucella and its two most common species B. abortus and B. melitensis. B. abortus was first reported as a causative agent of premature delivery in cattle and intermittent fever in humans [1,2]. Brucellosis stands first in the list of zoonotic bacterial diseases, and 500,000 cases are reported annually in disease-endemic regions [3–7]. Although brucellosis is a widespread livestock infection in the Middle East and North Africa, it has not been studied in detail, except for rough figures about the epidemiology of the infection in these regions [8]. The bacteria infect reproductive tissues, lymph nodes, and the spleen, and therefore cause inflammation, edema, and necrosis. In pregnant animals it causes placental lesions and increases the risks of abortion [9,10]. Brucellosis gains public health importance when the bacteria are transmitted to human via unpasteurized milk, meat, and animal byproducts, from infected animals [11]. Proper diagnosis is one of the key obstacles for the complete eradication of brucellosis. Although several serological tests such as the Rose Bengal tube test, serum agglutination test, and enzyme-linked Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 65; doi:10.3390/tropicalmed3020065 www.mdpi.com/journal/tropicalmed Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 65x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 14 several serological tests such as the Rose Bengal tube test, serum agglutination test, and enzyme- linkedimmunosorbent immunosorbent assay (ELISA) assay (ELISA) are used are for used disease for dise diagnosisase diagnosis in cattle; in however,cattle; however, these are these often are found often foundto be misleading to be misleading [12]. In [12]. recent In years,recent PCR-basedyears, PCR-based validation validation along with along serological with serological tests are tests widely are widelyused to used ensure to properensure diagnosesproper diagnoses [13]. Apart [13]. from Apart the from risk tothe public risk to health, public it health, also raises it also financial raises financialconcerns toconcerns livestock to stakeholders livestock stakeholders or latent product or latent consumers. product Figure consumers.1 is a graphical Figure 1 summarization is a graphical summarizationof brucellosis infection of brucellosis [14,15]. infection [14,15]. FigureFigure1. 1. SummarizingSummarizing the the impact impact of of BrucellaBrucella infectioninfection in in humans humans as as well well in in cattle. cattle. 1.1. Brucella: The The Causative Causative Agent of Brucellosis Brucellosis is caused by Brucella, a Gram-negative, aerobic, and facultative intracellular Brucellosis is caused by Brucella, a Gram-negative, aerobic, and facultative intracellular coccobacillus [16]. Based on taxonomic distribution, Brucella is classified as α-proteobacteria, which coccobacillus [16]. Based on taxonomic distribution, Brucella is classified as α-proteobacteria, which is is further divided into six species, each including several biovars. The species B. melitensis biovars 1– further divided into six species, each including several biovars. The species B. melitensis biovars 1–3 3 have been reported in sheep and goats, and B. abortus biovars 1–6 and 9 in cattle. Similarly, the have been reported in sheep and goats, and B. abortus biovars 1–6 and 9 in cattle. Similarly, the B. suis B. suis biovars 1–3 are known to infect pigs, while B. suis biovar 4 and 5 are more common for infection biovars 1–3 are known to infect pigs, while B. suis biovar 4 and 5 are more common for infection in in reindeer and small rodents. Among other common species, B. canis is found in dogs, B. ovis in reindeer and small rodents. Among other common species, B. canis is found in dogs, B. ovis in sheep, sheep, and B. neotomae in desert wood rats. Recently, B. pinnipedialis (in seals) and B. ceti (in whales and B. neotomae in desert wood rats. Recently, B. pinnipedialis (in seals) and B. ceti (in whales and and dolphins) are newly reported species, infecting marine animals [17]. dolphins) are newly reported species, infecting marine animals [17]. The genome structure of Brucella is composed of two chromosomes, without plasmids, making The genome structure of Brucella is composed of two chromosomes, without plasmids, making it it unique in Bacteriaceae. The recent introduction of genome sequence projects and genome unique in Bacteriaceae. The recent introduction of genome sequence projects and genome information information of B. melitensis (Gene Bank NC003317) and (NC003318), B. suis (Gene Bank NC002969), of B. melitensis (Gene Bank NC003317) and (NC003318), B. suis (Gene Bank NC002969), and B. abortus and B. abortus has opened up further gates towards the understanding of the disease pathogenicity has opened up further gates towards the understanding of the disease pathogenicity and its mode of and its mode of virulence [18,19]. Classification is usually based on the distinction between virulence [18,19]. Classification is usually based on the distinction between pathogenicity and host pathogenicity and host partiality [20]. B. abortus and B. melitensis are the key bovine brucellosis partiality [20]. B. abortus and B. melitensis are the key bovine brucellosis bacteria, while B. abortus, bacteria, while B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. suis, and B. canis are known for their infectivity in humans. B. melitensis, B. suis, and B. canis are known for their infectivity in humans. Studies have also reported Studies have also reported B. melitensis infection in sheep and goats [21,22]. B. melitensis infection in sheep and goats [21,22]. 1.2. Brucellosis Transmission The infection infection of of BrucellaBrucella speciesspecies is commonly is commonly mediated mediated by direct by direct contact contact with the with placenta, the placenta, fetus, fetalfetus, fluids, fetal fluids,and vaginal and vaginal discharges discharges or byproducts or byproducts (e.g., milk, (e.g., meat, milk, and meat, cheese) and from cheese) infected from infectedanimals [23,24].animals This [23,24 explains]. This explains why the why typical the typical route route of infection of infection is either is either direct direct ingestion ingestion or or via via mucous mucous membranes, brokenbroken skin, skin, and and in rarein rare cases cases intact intact skin [skin25,26 ].[25,26]. Professional Professional health workershealth workers are frequent are victimsfrequent of victimsBrucella ofinfection, Brucella infection, especially especially in regions in of regions prevalent of disease,prevalent and disease, it is documented and it is documented that nearly 12%that nearly of laboratory 12% of laboratory workers in workers Spain get in brucellosisSpain get brucellosis during fieldwork during fieldwork [27,28]. In [27,28]. addition, In addition, in utero intransmission, utero transmission, person-to-person person-to-person transmission, transmi and transmissionssion, and transmission associated with associated tissue transplantation with tissue transplantation have been observed in rare cases [29–31]. Aerial bacteria also remain a severe threat Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 65 3 of 14 have been observed in rare cases [29–31]. Aerial bacteria also remain a severe threat of infection, either
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Q Fever in Small Ruminants and Its Public Health Importance
    Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences ISSN: 2573-2196 Review Article Dairy and Vet Sci J Volume 9 Issue 1 - January 2019 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Tolera Tagesu Tucho DOI: 10.19080/JDVS.2019.09.555752 Q Fever in Small Ruminants and its Public Health Importance Tolera Tagesu* School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Ethiopia Submission: December 01, 2018; Published: January 11, 2019 *Corresponding author: Tolera Tagesu Tucho, School of Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma Oromia, Ethiopia Abstract Query fever is caused by Coxiella burnetii, it’s a worldwide zoonotic infectious disease where domestic small ruminants are the main reservoirs for human infections. Coxiella burnetii, is a Gram-negative obligate intracellular bacterium, adapted to thrive within the phagolysosome of the phagocyte. Humans become infected primarily by inhaling aerosols that are contaminated with C. burnetii. Ingestion (particularly drinking raw milk) and person-to-person transmission are minor routes. Animals shed the bacterium in urine and feces, and in very high concentrations in birth by-products. The bacterium persists in the environment in a resistant spore-like form which may become airborne and transported long distances by the wind. It is considered primarily as occupational disease of workers in close contact with farm animals or processing their be commenced immediately whenever Q fever is suspected. To prevent both the introduction and spread of Q fever infection, preventive measures shouldproducts, be however,implemented it may including occur also immunization in persons without with currently direct contact. available Doxycycline vaccines drugof domestic is the first small line ruminant of treatment animals for Q and fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Hospitalist Missouri Society
    MISSOURI HOSPITALIST MISSOURI SOCIETY HOSPITALIST Publisher: Issue 22 October 22, 2009 Division of General IM University of Missouri Hospitalist Update Columbia, Missouri Dealing with Hypertensive Urgencies Syed Ahsan, MD Editor: Robert Folzenlogen MD INTRODUCTION Patients presenting with severe hypertension can often be alarming for house officers and family members. Systolic blood pressures > 180 mm Hg, with or without a diastolic blood pressure >120, have been known to progress to hypertensive emer- Inside this issue: gencies. The majority of complications are related to end organ damage; this may include encephalopa- thy, blurred vision, chest pain, unstable angina, Hospitalist Update acute myocardial infarction and acute renal insuffi- ciency, with or without proteinuria. In the absence of these acute signs, the control of hypertensive urgency remains paramount but is not considered an emergency. Case of the Month The etiology of severe, asymptomatic hypertension is extremely important in defin- ing treatment strategies. The majority of these patients have a prolonged history of uncontrolled hypertension secondary to poor compliance or inadequate treatment From the Journals regimens. Guidelines are not entirely specific in the management of hypertensive ur- gency. ID Corner TREATMENT STRATEGY Based on the current literature, the following approach is recommended: Calendar 1. Confirm that the blood pressure is elevated. The reading should be re- peated in both upper extremities; the physician should ensure that the appropriate cuff size is used and that the readings are consistent. Comments 2. Goal for blood pressure reduction: the ideal goal is to reduce the systolic blood pressure by 20-25% and this should be done over a period of hours to days.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Onset Still's Disease Accompanied by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Case Report
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 12: 1817-1821, 2015 Adult onset Still's disease accompanied by acute respiratory distress syndrome: A case report XIAO-TU XI1, MAO‑JIE WANG2, RUN‑YUE HUANG2 and BANG‑HAN DING1 1Emergency Department; 2Rheumatology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, P.R. China Received July 17, 2015; Accepted May 20, 2016 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3512 Abstract. Adult onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic vascular permeability and a loss of aerated lung tissue (8). inflammatory disorder characterized by rash, leukocytosis, ARDS occurs in 7.2‑38.9/100,000 individuals (9,10), and has fever and arthralgia/arthritis. The most common pulmo- a mortality rate of ~40% (11). Patient mortality varies based nary manifestations associated with AOSD are pulmonary on numerous factors, including age, etiology of the lung injury infiltrates and pleural effusion. The present study describes and non‑pulmonary organ dysfunction. The most common a 40‑year‑old male with AOSD who developed fever, sore risk factors for ARDS are pneumonia, sepsis, aspiration and throat and shortness of breath. Difficulty breathing promptly trauma (11). Multiple predisposing risk factors, in addition to developed, and the patient was diagnosed with acute respira- some secondary factors such as alcohol abuse and obesity, also tory distress syndrome (ARDS). The patient did not respond increase the risk (4). In addition to patient support provided by to antibiotics, including imipenem, vancomycin, fluconazole, improving oxygen delivery to the tissues and preventing multi- moxifloxacin, penicillin, doxycycline and meropenem, but was organ system failure, early recognition and correction of the sensitive to glucocorticoid treatment, including methylpred- underlying cause is important in ARDS treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaria History
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and David Sullivan. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. Malariology Overview History, Lifecycle, Epidemiology, Pathology, and Control David Sullivan, MD Malaria History • 2700 BCE: The Nei Ching (Chinese Canon of Medicine) discussed malaria symptoms and the relationship between fevers and enlarged spleens. • 1550 BCE: The Ebers Papyrus mentions fevers, rigors, splenomegaly, and oil from Balantines tree as mosquito repellent. • 6th century BCE: Cuneiform tablets mention deadly malaria-like fevers affecting Mesopotamia. • Hippocrates from studies in Egypt was first to make connection between nearness of stagnant bodies of water and occurrence of fevers in local population. • Romans also associated marshes with fever and pioneered efforts to drain swamps. • Italian: “aria cattiva” = bad air; “mal aria” = bad air. • French: “paludisme” = rooted in swamp. Cure Before Etiology: Mid 17th Century - Three Theories • PC Garnham relates that following: An earthquake caused destruction in Loxa in which many cinchona trees collapsed and fell into small lake or pond and water became very bitter as to be almost undrinkable. Yet an Indian so thirsty with a violent fever quenched his thirst with this cinchona bark contaminated water and was better in a day or two.
    [Show full text]
  • Coxiella Burnetii
    SENTINEL LEVEL CLINICAL LABORATORY GUIDELINES FOR SUSPECTED AGENTS OF BIOTERRORISM AND EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES Coxiella burnetii American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Revised March 2016 For latest revision, see web site below: https://www.asm.org/Articles/Policy/Laboratory-Response-Network-LRN-Sentinel-Level-C ASM Subject Matter Expert: David Welch, Ph.D. Medical Microbiology Consulting Dallas, TX [email protected] ASM Sentinel Laboratory Protocol Working Group APHL Advisory Committee Vickie Baselski, Ph.D. Barbara Robinson-Dunn, Ph.D. Patricia Blevins, MPH University of Tennessee at Department of Clinical San Antonio Metro Health Memphis Pathology District Laboratory Memphis, TN Beaumont Health System [email protected] [email protected] Royal Oak, MI BRobinson- Erin Bowles David Craft, Ph.D. [email protected] Wisconsin State Laboratory of Penn State Milton S. Hershey Hygiene Medical Center Michael A. Saubolle, Ph.D. [email protected] Hershey, PA Banner Health System [email protected] Phoenix, AZ Christopher Chadwick, MS [email protected] Association of Public Health Peter H. Gilligan, Ph.D. m Laboratories University of North Carolina [email protected] Hospitals/ Susan L. Shiflett Clinical Microbiology and Michigan Department of Mary DeMartino, BS, Immunology Labs Community Health MT(ASCP)SM Chapel Hill, NC Lansing, MI State Hygienic Laboratory at the [email protected] [email protected] University of Iowa [email protected] Larry Gray, Ph.D. Alice Weissfeld, Ph.D. TriHealth Laboratories and Microbiology Specialists Inc. Harvey Holmes, PhD University of Cincinnati College Houston, TX Centers for Disease Control and of Medicine [email protected] Prevention Cincinnati, OH om [email protected] [email protected] David Welch, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis Are Tick-Borne Diseases Caused by Obligate Anaplasmosis: Intracellular Bacteria in the Genera Ehrlichia and Anaplasma
    Ehrlichiosis and Importance Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are tick-borne diseases caused by obligate Anaplasmosis: intracellular bacteria in the genera Ehrlichia and Anaplasma. These organisms are widespread in nature; the reservoir hosts include numerous wild animals, as well as Zoonotic Species some domesticated species. For many years, Ehrlichia and Anaplasma species have been known to cause illness in pets and livestock. The consequences of exposure vary Canine Monocytic Ehrlichiosis, from asymptomatic infections to severe, potentially fatal illness. Some organisms Canine Hemorrhagic Fever, have also been recognized as human pathogens since the 1980s and 1990s. Tropical Canine Pancytopenia, Etiology Tracker Dog Disease, Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are caused by members of the genera Ehrlichia Canine Tick Typhus, and Anaplasma, respectively. Both genera contain small, pleomorphic, Gram negative, Nairobi Bleeding Disorder, obligate intracellular organisms, and belong to the family Anaplasmataceae, order Canine Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, Rickettsiales. They are classified as α-proteobacteria. A number of Ehrlichia and Canine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, Anaplasma species affect animals. A limited number of these organisms have also Equine Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, been identified in people. Equine Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, Recent changes in taxonomy can make the nomenclature of the Anaplasmataceae Tick-borne Fever, and their diseases somewhat confusing. At one time, ehrlichiosis was a group of Pasture Fever, diseases caused by organisms that mostly replicated in membrane-bound cytoplasmic Human Monocytic Ehrlichiosis, vacuoles of leukocytes, and belonged to the genus Ehrlichia, tribe Ehrlichieae and Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, family Rickettsiaceae. The names of the diseases were often based on the host Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis, species, together with type of leukocyte most often infected.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions for Zoonotic Disease Prevention in Veterinary Personnel
    Compendium of Veterinary Standard Precautions for Zoonotic Disease Prevention in Veterinary Personnel National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians Veterinary Infection Control Committee 2010 Preface.............................................................................................................................................................. 1405 I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................... 1405 A. OBJECTIVES...................................................................................................................................... 1405 B. BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1405 C. CONSIDERATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 1405 II. ZOONOTIC DISEASE TRANSMISSION................................................................................................ 1406 A. SOURCE ............................................................................................................................................ 1406 B. HOST SUSCEPTIBILITY.................................................................................................................... 1406 C. ROUTES OF TRANSMISSION........................................................................................................... 1406 1. CONTACT TRANSMISSION.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Chloroquine And
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A systematic review and meta‑analysis on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy or combined with azithromycin in COVID‑19 treatment Ramy Mohamed Ghazy1, Abdallah Almaghraby2*, Ramy Shaaban3, Ahmed Kamal4, Hatem Beshir5,6, Amr Moursi7, Ahmed Ramadan8 & Sarah Hamed N. Taha9 Many recent studies have investigated the role of either Chloroquine (CQ) or Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) alone or in combination with azithromycin (AZM) in the management of the emerging coronavirus. This systematic review and meta‑analysis of either published or preprint observational studies or randomized control trials (RCT) aimed to assess mortality rate, duration of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation (MV), virologic cure rate (VQR), time to a negative viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR), radiological progression, experiencing drug side efects, and clinical worsening. A search of the online database through June 2020 was performed and examined the reference lists of pertinent articles for in‑vivo studies only. Pooled relative risks (RRs), standard mean diferences of 95% confdence intervals (CIs) were calculated with the random‑efects model. Mortality was not diferent between the standard care (SC) and HCQ groups (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.61–1.59, I2 = 82%), meta‑regression analysis proved that mortality was signifcantly diferent across the studies from diferent countries. However, mortality among the HCQ + AZM was signifcantly higher than among the SC (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.19–2.27, I2 = 70%). The duration of hospital stay in days was shorter in the SC in comparison with the HCQ group (standard mean diference = 0.57, 95% CI 0.20–0.94, I2 = 92%), or the HCQ + AZM (standard mean diference = 0.77, 95% CI 0.46–1.08, I2 = 81).
    [Show full text]
  • Herd Health Protocols for Dromedary Camels (Camelus Dromedarius) at Mpala Ranch and Research Centre, Laikipia County, Kenya
    Herd Health Protocols for Dromedary Camels (Camelus dromedarius) at Mpala Ranch and Research Centre, Laikipia County, Kenya September 23rd, 2012 Andrew Springer Browne, MVB Veterinary Public Health Program University of Missouri – Columbia, USA Sharon Deem, DVM, PhD, DACZM Institute for Conservation Medicine Saint Louis Zoo, St. Louis, MO, USA This guide was made to solidify husbandry and record protocols as well as give feasible advice for common health problems in camels at the Mpala Ranch and Research Centre. For thorough reviews of camel diseases and health, see “A Field Manual of Camel Diseases” by Kohler-­­Rollefson and “Medicine and Surgery of Camelids” by Fowler. Acknowledgments Many thanks to Margaret Kinnaird and Mike Littlewood for their patience and support during our visit. Thank you to Laura Budd and Sina Mahs for their incredible help and time dedicated to the project. Finally, a special thanks to S. Moso, Eputh, Abduraman, Adow, Abdulai, Ekomoel, and Ewoi for working and living with the camels every day. Asante sana. -­­ Springer and Sharon ii Table of Contents Page Key Management Goals 1 Record Keeping 2 Electronic and Paper Records 3 Entering Data into Excel Database 4 Excel Database Legend 5 Husbandry 6 Calf Care 7 Maternal Rejection 8 Dam Care 9 Branding and Identification 10 Weight Estimates/Body Condition Scoring 11 Milking Schedule and Boma Rotation 12 Veterinary Care 13 Preventive Veterinary Health Care 14 Diagnostics 15 Abortion 16 Skin Wounds 17 Abscess Treatment 18 Mastitis 19 Eye Problems 20 Diseases of Special
    [Show full text]
  • Genital Brucella Suis Biovar 2 Infection of Wild Boar (Sus Scrofa) Hunted in Tuscany (Italy)
    microorganisms Article Genital Brucella suis Biovar 2 Infection of Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Hunted in Tuscany (Italy) Giovanni Cilia * , Filippo Fratini , Barbara Turchi, Marta Angelini, Domenico Cerri and Fabrizio Bertelloni Department of Veterinary Science, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy; fi[email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (B.T.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (D.C.); [email protected] (F.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Brucellosis is a zoonosis caused by different Brucella species. Wild boar (Sus scrofa) could be infected by some species and represents an important reservoir, especially for B. suis biovar 2. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Brucella spp. by serological and molecular assays in wild boar hunted in Tuscany (Italy) during two hunting seasons. From 287 animals, sera, lymph nodes, livers, spleens, and reproductive system organs were collected. Within sera, 16 (5.74%) were positive to both rose bengal test (RBT) and complement fixation test (CFT), with titres ranging from 1:4 to 1:16 (corresponding to 20 and 80 ICFTU/mL, respectively). Brucella spp. DNA was detected in four lymph nodes (1.40%), five epididymides (1.74%), and one fetus pool (2.22%). All positive PCR samples belonged to Brucella suis biovar 2. The results of this investigation confirmed that wild boar represents a host for B. suis biovar. 2 and plays an important role in the epidemiology of brucellosis in central Italy. Additionally, epididymis localization confirms the possible venereal transmission. Citation: Cilia, G.; Fratini, F.; Turchi, B.; Angelini, M.; Cerri, D.; Bertelloni, Keywords: Brucella suis biovar 2; wild boar; surveillance; epidemiology; reproductive system F.
    [Show full text]
  • BRUCELLA PINNIPEDIALIS in GREY SEALS (HALICHOERUS GRYPUS) and HARBOR SEALS (PHOCA VITULINA) in the NETHERLANDS Authors: Michiel V
    BRUCELLA PINNIPEDIALIS IN GREY SEALS (HALICHOERUS GRYPUS) AND HARBOR SEALS (PHOCA VITULINA) IN THE NETHERLANDS Authors: Michiel V. Kroese, Lisa Beckers, Yvette J. W. M. Bisselink, Sophie Brasseur, Peter W. van Tulden, et. al. Source: Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 54(3) : 439-449 Published By: Wildlife Disease Association URL: https://doi.org/10.7589/2017-05-097 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Journal-of-Wildlife-Diseases on 27 Jun 2019 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use DOI: 10.7589/2017-05-097 Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 54(3), 2018, pp. 439–449 Ó Wildlife Disease Association 2018 BRUCELLA PINNIPEDIALIS IN GREY SEALS (HALICHOERUS GRYPUS) AND HARBOR SEALS (PHOCA VITULINA) IN THE NETHERLANDS Michiel V. Kroese,1 Lisa Beckers,1,2 Yvette J. W. M. Bisselink,1,5 Sophie Brasseur,3 Peter W.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Bacteria and Their Relatives”
    INTERNATIONALJOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICBACTERIOLOGY, July 1988, p. 321-325 Vol. 38, No. 3 0020-7713/88/03032 1-05$02.OOtO Copyright 0 1988, International Union of Microbiological Societies Proteobacteria classis nov. a Name for the Phylogenetic Taxon That Includes the “Purple Bacteria and Their Relatives” E. STACKEBRANDT,l R. G. E. MURRAY,2* AND H. G. TRUPER3 Lehrstuhl fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologie, Biologiezentrum, Christian-Albrechts Universitat, 2300 Kid, Federal Republic of Germany’; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C12; and Institut fur Mikrobiulogie, Universitat Bonn, 5300 Bonn I, Federal Republic of Germany3 Proteobacteria classis nov. is suggested as the name for a new higher taxon to circumscribe the a, p, y, and 6 groups that are included among the phylogenetic relatives of the purple photosynthetic bacteria and as a suitable collective name for reference to that group. The group names (alpha, etc.) remain as vernacular terms at the level of subclass pending further studies and nomenclatural proposals. Phylogenetic interpretations derived from the study of the interim while the phylogenetic data are being integrated ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) sequences and oligonu- into formal bacterial taxonomy. It does not appear to be cleotide catalogs provide an important factual base for inappropriate or confusing to use the protean prefix because arrangements of higher taxa of bacteria (25, 26). A recent of the genus Proteus among the Proteobacteria; the reasons workshop organized by the International Committee on for use are clear enough. Systematic Bacteriology recognized that a particularly di- This new class is so far only definable in phylogenetic verse but related group of gram-negative bacteria, including terms.
    [Show full text]