M Karunanidhi: the Dravidian Sun Sets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M Karunanidhi: the Dravidian Sun Sets ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 M Karunanidhi: The Dravidian Sun Sets A KALAIYARASAN KARTHICK RAM MANOHARAN A Kalaiyarasan ([email protected]) is at Madras Institute of Development Studies. Karthick Ram Manoharan ([email protected]) is at the Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta. The authors would like to thank S Anandhi, Ezhilarasan, Jeyaranjan, V M Subagunarajan and M Vijayabaskar for their inputs. Vol. 53, Issue No. 31, 04 Aug, 2018 When Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam chief and five-time Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu Muthuvel Karunanidhi passed away on 7 August 2018, he had outlived most of his friends and all of his rivals. “Kalaignar,” as he was popularly known among the Tamil people, left behind an active political life of 80 years, six decades of which were spent as a legislator. Born on 3 June 1924 into a poor family from an extremely marginalised backward caste, M Karunanidhi was witness to key events of the last century that shaped the world as we know it today. He was also a key participant in events that radically shaped the nature of politics in Tamil Nadu. In an interview on 16 February 1965, a correspondent of Pravda, the official organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, asked Karunanidhi about the goals of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). Karunanidhi responded that the goals were social justice in society, rationalism in culture, socialism in economy, and democracy in politics. The route to achieve these goals, he said, was via the parliament. Hailing from a community that was stigmatised by an oppressive feudal system in his hometown of Thiruvarur, he was drawn to the radical anti-caste discourse of Periyar. His own experience of caste humiliation played a ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 significant role in his approach to politics. In an interview, he said “Only a person who is subjected to humiliation can think of performing surgery to get rid of gangrene and not indulge in a cosmetic cover-up” (Pannerselvam 2017). As a teenager, he was an avid reader of Kudi Arasu, the Self-Respect movement’s mouthpiece, and would later join its editorial team. He was 14 when he took part in the anti- Hindi agitations, decrying the imposition of Hindi. At 15, he edited Manava Nesan, a handwritten fortnightly newspaper that was circulated among his school mates and friends in Thiruvarur from 1938. After this newspaper became defunct, he launched Murasoli, a pamphlet publication in 1942. He endearingly referred to it as his first child and it later became the official daily for the DMK. His flair for the Tamil language brought him to the attention of the politically astute C N Annadurai, who saw in the young activist an able lieutenant of the Dravidian movement. Karunanidhi would side with the pragmatist Annadurai over the militant Periyar when the former made a decisive political break with the Dravidar Kazhagam (DK) to form the DMK in 1949. M S S Pandian (2011) writes that the politics of the DMK was built around two major ideological planks. The first was caste-based social justice; the second, Tamil identity. The politics of social justice took the form of a critique of caste hierarchy and Brahminism coupled with continuous improvisations in the reservation of government jobs and seats in educational institutions for the lower castes. Tamil identity was more than a language. Tamil, for Karunanidhi, was simultaneously anti-Sanskrit, anti-caste, and secular. It produced horizontal solidarities among Tamils, contesting the politics of the mainstream Indian nationalists to create congruence between Hindi, Hindu, and Hindustan. The screenplays that Karunanidhi penned for popular films like Parasakthi (1952) and Manohara (1954) took the DMK’s message to the masses, and cemented his position within the party. Such was his influence within the party that Periyar acerbically referred to the DMK as the “Thiruvarur Muthuvel Karunanidhi” party (corresponding to the Tamil acronym for the DMK, Thi Mu Ka). Yet, the same Periyar would chide M G Ramachandran (MGR) when the cine-star split from Karunanidhi to form the Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (ADMK) in 1972. Karunanidhi, who had played a key role in bringing the DMK to power, had a tougher time maintaining that power after he took over from his mentor Annadurai following the latter’s demise in 1969. Despite facing MGR’s split, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) challenge, and the dismissal of the state government twice—once during the Emergency under charges of corruption and the consequent imposition of the President’s Rule, and the second time in 1991 by Chandra Shekhar's coalition under the dubious Article 356—the DMK managed to push forward schemes for social and economic justice. ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Commitment to Social Justice In 1969, the DMK set up a backward class commission, the first of its kind at the state level in independent India, to identify and increase the provision of reservations for backward castes in Tamil Nadu. Karunanidhi took a pro-Dalit stand. He increased the reservation for Dalits from 15% to 18% as against the commissions’ recommendation of continuing it at the pre-existing level of 15%. He increased the backward caste reservation from 25% to 31% although the committee recommended it to be increased to 33%. Later, when the AIADMK led by MGR flirted with the idea of reservations based on economic criteria, it was militantly challenged by the DMK, leading to a rout of the former in the parliamentary elections of 1980. The discourse of social justice popularised by the DMK and the competitive electoral compulsions led MGR to increase the reservations for the Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to 50%. In 1989, when Karunanidhi returned to power, he responded to the Vanniyar agitations and provided 20% separate reservation within the OBC quota for the most backward castes, including denotified communities in order to check the over-influence of a few dominant backward castes. He welcomed the implementation of Mandal Commission at a time when the north saw huge protests against the same. By passing a unanimous resolution in the assembly in support of V P Singh, he made the Mandal commission implementation a moment of jubilation in the state. Likewise, in 2007, the DMK also provided 3.5% quota each for Muslims and Christians within the OBC share of 30%. In 2009, Karunanidhi introduced the Tamil Nadu Arunthathiyars (Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appointments or posts in the Services under the State within the Reservation for the Scheduled Castes) Act to ensure representation for the most marginalised among the Scheduled Castes (SCs), providing them a sub-quota of 3% within the SC. When taunted by the AIADMK for being a “minority government” during the 2006–2011 tenure, Karunanidhi responded with characteristic wit that his was a government for the minorities. The Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961 was amended during the Karunanidhi government in 1970, and the ceiling area fixed earlier at 30 standard acres was reduced to 15 standard acres. His government distributed the acquired surplus land to landless peasants. An ex-bureaucrat who worked closely with Karunanidhi recalls an incident from 1969, when the poor peasantry was fighting for landholding rights in Pudukkottai, and Karunanidhi joined them and travelled the entire region, addressing 19 meetings in a day. To his critics from the left, he asked “what do you know about deprivation that I do not know?” (Narayan 2018). Defending the “Region”, Defying the Centre During his first visit to New Delhi as Chief Minister in March 1969, Karunanidhi responded ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 to questions regarding state autonomy at a press meet. He said, “A committee would be constituted to look into sharing of powers between centre and the state. Tamil Nadu government has decided to constitute the committee. Giving more powers to the states would not affect the unity of the country” (Karunanidhi 2008: 73). In this spirit, the Rajamannar committee was formed and a resolution for state’s rights was passed in the state assembly. In the National Development Council meeting held on 18 April 1969, Karunanidhi participated and spoke in Tamil. He emphasised on reviewing the centre–state relations and demanded for the arrangement of a chief ministers’ meeting to discuss this further. Based on the observations submitted by Justice Rajamannar on state autonomy, a detailed report was prepared including the suggestions by a committee that involved leaders like Murasoli Maran and R Sezhiyan. The report was discussed in the ministerial meeting and subsequently a resolution on regional autonomy was passed in the state assembly in 1974. This was the first resolution of its kind to be passed in a state assembly in India. Tabling the resolution that emphasised the autonomy of the states in the Tamil Nadu assembly on 16 April 1974, Karunanidhi said, “A person was released from the prison but his hands and legs were still bound. Because of that he could not embrace his child though he was out of jail. In the happiness of leaving jail, he forgot to remove the chains when he came out. Similarly, India attained independence. But the states are still bound by unnecessary concentration of powers at the centre.” (2008: 435) He said that this resolution had invited angst from the centre. His government was dismissed two years later. When Indira Gandhi declared the Emergency on 26 June 1975, the very next day, Karunanidhi convened DMK’s chief executive meeting and passed a resolution demanding Gandhi to withdraw it. This was the first formal opposition put forward by any party in the country against the Emergency.
Recommended publications
  • The Fault Lines in Tamil Nadu That the DMK Now Has to Confront
    TIF - The Fault Lines in Tamil Nadu that the DMK Now Has to Confront KALAIYARASAN A June 4, 2021 M. VIJAYABASKAR Is modernisation of occupations in Tamil Nadu possible? A young worker at a brick factory near Chennai | brianindia/Alamy The DMK faces new challenges in expanding social justice alongside economic modernisation: internal fault lines have emerged in the form of cracks in the Dravidian coalition of lower castes and there are external ones such as reduced autonomy for states. As anticipated, the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK)-led alliance has come to power in Tamil Nadu after winning 159 out of the 234 seats in the state assembly. Many within the party had expected it to repeat its 2019 sweep in the Lok Sabha elections. The All-India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), despite having been in power for a decade and losing its long-time leader J. Jayalalithaa, managed to retain a good share of its vote base. The AIADMK government was often seen to compromise the interests of the state because of pressure from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), with which it had allied. The DMK’s election campaign had, therefore, emphasised the loss of the state’s dignity and autonomy because of the AIADMK-BJP alliance and promised a return to the Page 1 www.TheIndiaForum.in June 4, 2021 Dravidian ethos that had earlier informed the state’s development. Apart from welfare, the DMK’s election manifesto emphasised reforms in governance of service delivery, and growth across sectors, agriculture in particular. The DMK’s victory has come at a time when Tamil Nadu is faced with a series of challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Personality Politics Died with Amma'
    'Personality politics died with Amma' 'I don't think after Amma, the cult of personality will endure.' 'I think there will be a shift back to the politics of ideology and principles rather than a cult of personality.' P T R Palanivel Thiagarajan is the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam MLA from the Madurai ​ ​ Central constituency. A former America-based merchant banker, he returned to Tamil Nadu to contest a seat his father P T R Palanivel Rajan had represented in the state assembly. His observations during the discussions on the budget in the assembly were acknowledged by then chief minister J Jayalalithaa. P T R Palanivel Thiagarajan draws the trajectory of Tamil Nadu politics after Jayalalithaa's death. It will be difficult for All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam members to find a common cause. They had a towering personality for a leader and filling that vacuum will not be possible. I don't see another leader taking her place in the near future. There is nobody of her stature. It is a generational shift and in her case the successor is not obvious. It is a inter generational transfer. It started with Perarignar Anna (the late Tamil Nadu CM C N ​ Annadurai, founder of the DMK and the inspiration for the AIADMK) and then MGR (the late ​ ​ Tamil Nadu CM M G Ramachandran). ​ With Anna, the politics was based on ideology which was different from the earlier Congress government in Tamil Nadu. During MGR's time, it was a big shift from ideology governance to a personality cult. With the DMK and the Congress, there was a marked difference in ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Parliament LARRDIS (L.C.)/2012
    he TIndian Parliament LARRDIS (L.C.)/2012 © 2012 Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (Fourteenth Edition). LARRDIS (L.C.)/2012 he © 2012 Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi TIndian Parliament Editor T. K. Viswanathan Secretary-General Lok Sabha Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (Fourteenth Edition). Lok Sabha Secretariat New Delhi Foreword In the over six decades that our Parliament has served its exalted purpose, it has witnessed India change from a feudally administered colony to a liberal democracy that is today the world's largest and also the most diverse. For not only has it been the country's supreme legislative body it has also ensured that the individual rights of each and every citizen of India remain inviolable. Like the Parliament building itself, power as configured by our Constitution radiates out from this supreme body of people's representatives. The Parliament represents the highest aspirations of the people, their desire to seek for themselves a better life. dignity, social equity and a sense of pride in belonging to a nation, a civilization that has always valued deliberation and contemplation over war and aggression. Democracy. as we understand it, derives its moral strength from the principle of Ahimsa or non-violence. In it is implicit the right of every Indian, rich or poor, mighty or humble, male or female to be heard. The Parliament, as we know, is the highest law making body. It also exercises complete budgetary control as it approves and monitors expenditure.
    [Show full text]
  • Instead for Special Economic Zones in India Sumeet Jain
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 32 | Issue 1 Fall 2011 "You Say Nano, We Say No-No:" Getting a "Yes" Instead for Special Economic Zones in India Sumeet Jain Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Sumeet Jain, "You Say Nano, We Say No-No:" Getting a "Yes" Instead for Special Economic Zones in India, 32 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 1 (2011). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb/vol32/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. “You Say Nano, We Say No-No:” Getting a “Yes” Instead for Special Economic Zones in India Sumeet Jain* Abstract: Special Economic Zones (SEZs) have the potential to be valuable in- struments of economic growth and development in India. Yet, as a result of the resistance facing them, SEZs in India have not delivered economic benefits to their fullest potential. For this reason, reducing the resistance facing SEZs is critical to their success. This article seeks to reduce this resistance by devising a consensus-building plan based on a regulatory negotiation approach. The ar- ticle first shows that the past and present resistance facing India’s economic zones is a product of the lack of public input in the design of their policy. It then presents a platform for understanding the proponents’ and opponents’ argu- ments by distilling the current legislation and regulation governing India’s SEZ policy into a cohesive operational framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Periyar 1000 Pages
    Compiled by : Dr. K.Veeramani A Publication of DRAVIDAR KAZHAGAM Periyar Thidal, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007. PERIYAR 1000 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS (All about Periyar E.V.Ramasamy) Compiled by: Dr. K.Veeramani Translated by: Prof. S.F.N. Chelliah Pages : 240 (1/8 Demmy) Donation (Minimum) : Rs.50/- Rs.60/- Rs.70/- Rs.80/- Rs.90/- Rs.100/- First Edition : 2013 Published by Dravidar Kazhagam ‘Periyar Thidal’. No. 84/1(50), E.V.K. Sampath Road, Vepery, Chennai - 600 007, Tamil Nadu - India Tel: 91-44-26618161 Fax: 91-44-26618866 Printed by ‘Viduthalai’ Offset Printers, 84/1(50), E.V.K. Sampath Salai, Chennai - 7 Available at Periyar Book House 84/1(50), E.V.K. Sampath Salai, Vepery, CHENNAI - 7. : 91-44-26618162 Periyar Maligai, Puthur, TRICHY - 17. : 91-431-2771815 Website: www.dravidianbookhouse.com ISBN : 978-93-80972-96-1 nlike world's other thinkers, Th anthai Periyar was an original thinker. Th e enrichment of his thoughts is the seed of social development and Ua weapon for social revolution. In addition to this; his rationalistic thoughts are totally based on scientifi c thinking. Th at is why we feel proud of calling him a 'rare social scientist'. What is Science? And who is a Scientist? What is scientifi c temperament? Even the teachers of science, do not seem to know the real meaning of science. Th ey only know science as 'a subject', 'a study', nothing more. We are puzzled why they are not interested to know or to understand the real meaning of science and to teach the students.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Analysis of Periyar's Views
    FUZZY AND NEUTROSOPHIC ANALYSIS OF PERIYAR’S VIEWS ON UNTOUCHABILITY W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy Florentin Smarandache K. Kandasamy Translation of the speeches and writings of Periyar from Tamil by Meena Kandasamy November 2005 FUZZY AND NEUTROSOPHIC ANALYSIS OF PERIYAR’S VIEWS ON UNTOUCHABILITY W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy e-mail: [email protected] web: http://mat.iitm.ac.in/~wbv Florentin Smarandache e-mail: [email protected] K. Kandasamy e-mail: [email protected] Translation of the speeches and writings of Periyar from Tamil by Meena Kandasamy November 2005 2 Dedicated to Periyar CONTENTS Preface 5 Chapter One BASIC NOTION OF FCMs, FRMs, NCMs AND NRMS 1.1 Definition of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps 9 1.2 Fuzzy Cognitive Maps – Properties and Models 13 1.3 Fuzzy Relational Maps 18 1.4 An Introduction to Neutrosophy and some Neutrosophic algebraic structures 22 1.5 Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps 27 1.6 Neutrosophic Relational Maps — Definition with Examples 31 Chapter Two UNTOUCHABILITY: PERIYAR’S VIEW AND PRESENT DAY SITUATION A FUZZY AND NEUTROSOPHIC ANALYSIS 2.1 Analysis of untouchability due to Hindu religion using FCMs and NCMs 43 2.2 Analysis of discrimination faced by Dalits/ Sudras in the field of education as untouchables using FCMs and NCMs 58 2.3 Social inequality faced by Dalits and some of the most backward classes - an analysis using FCM and NCM 66 4 2.4 Problems faced by Dalits in the political arena due to discrimination – a FCM and NCM analysis 75 2.5 Study of Economic Status of Dalits due to untouchability using fuzzy and neutrosophic
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Aco3mxddati0n of Primqpjdial Parties
    THE POLITICAL ACO3MXDDATI0N OF PRIMQPJDIAL PARTIES DMK (India) and PAS (Malaysia) , by Y. Mansoor Marican M.Soc.Sci. (S'pore), 1971 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FL^iDlMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of. Political Science) We accept this thesis as conforniing to the required standard THE IJNT^RSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November. 1976 ® Y. Mansoor Marican, 1976. In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of POLITICAL SCIENCE The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 ABSTRACT This study is rooted in a theoretical interest in the development of parties that appeal mainly to primordial ties. The claims of social relationships based on tribe, race, language or religion have the capacity to rival the civil order of the state for the loyalty of its citizens, thus threatening to undermine its political authority. This phenomenon is endemic to most Asian and African states. Most previous research has argued that political competition in such contexts encourages the formation of primordially based parties whose activities threaten the integrity of these states.
    [Show full text]
  • LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version)
    .BSDI Twelfth Series, Vol. I, No. I LOK SABHA DEBATES (English Version) First Session (Twelfth Lok Sabha) I Gazettes & Debetes Unit ...... Parliament Library BulldlnO @Q~m ~o. FBr.026 .. ~-- -- (Vol. I contains Nos. I to 8) LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI I'ri ce .· Rs. 50. ()() 'VU"".&J:Ia.a.a IL.V .................. ~_ (Engl illl1 v«sian) 'lUeaJay, IIKcb 24, 1998/Chaitra 3, 1920 (Salta) Col.l1ine F« Raad CaltE!1ts/2 (fran &lltcn Salahuddin OWaisi Shri S. S. OWaiai below) 42/28 9/6 (fran below); SHRI ARIF HOfP.MW.D KHAN liIRI ARIF ~D KHAN 10/6 (fran below) j 11. /7,19: 13/3 12/5 (fran below) Delete "an" 13,19 (fran below) CalSSlsnal CalSE!1sual 22/25 hills hails CONTENTS {Twelfth Series. Vol. I. First Session. 199811920 (Seke)J No.2, Tuesday, March 24,1l1li Chain 3,1120 (lab) SUBJECT CoLUMNS MEMBERS SWORN 1-8 f)1:" SPEAKER 8-8 FI::L "'I-fE SPEAKER Shri Atal Biharl Vajpayee •.. 8-14 Shri Sharad Pawar ..• 14-15 Shrl Somnath Chatterjee .. 1~18 Shri Pumo A. Sangma .. 18-17 Kumari Mamata Banerjee .17-18 Shri Ram Vilas Paswan .•. 18 Shri R. Muthiah 19 Shri Mulayam Singh Yadav 19-20 Shri Lalu Prasad ... 21-22 Shri K. Yerrannaidu 22-23 Shri Naveen Patnaik 23 Shri Digvijay Singh .. 23-24 Shri Indrajit Gupta .. 24-25 Sardar Surjit Singh Bamala 2~2e Shri Murasoli Maran 28-28 Shri Shivraj ~. Palll .. ,. 28-29 Shri Madhukar Sirpotdar ... -_ ... 29-31 Shri Sanat Kumar Mandai 31 Shri P.C. Thomas 31-32 Kumari.
    [Show full text]
  • Ma Regular.Pdf
    BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY- TIRUCHIRAPPALLI MASTER OF ARTS IN HISTORY CHOICE BASED CREDIT SYSTEM for Candidates 2018-2019 onwards Semester - Course Instruct Credit Marks Total I ion Internal External Credits-25 Hours 1. Evolution of Ideas and 6 5 25 75 100 Institutions in Ancient India [HIS1CC1] (including Map study) 2. Evolution of Ideas and 6 5 25 75 100 Institutions in Medieval India [HIS1CC2] (including Map study) 3. Colonialism and 6 5 25 75 100 Nationalism in Modern India [ HIS1CC3 ] 4. Political History of Tamil 6 5 25 75 100 Nadu from Early times to 1565 [HIS1CC4] 5. History of Contemporary 6 6 25 75 100 India: Challenges and Perspectives [ HIS1CC5] Semester - 6. Research Methods in 6 5 25 75 100 II History [HIS2CC6] Credits-22 7. Revolutions in Europe 6 5 25 75 100 1914-1991 [HIS2CC7] 8. Colonialism and 6 5 25 75 100 Nationalism in Tamil Nadu [HIS2CC8] 9. Elective (Major Based) 6 5 25 75 100 Elective Paper [ HIS2EC1] 10. Elective (Non-Major Based) 3 2 25 75 100 Constitution for Competitive Examination [HIS2EDC1] Semester - 11. History of Science 6 5 25 75 100 III and Technology Credits-22 [HIS3CC9] 12. Elective (Major 6 5 25 75 100 Based) Elective Paper [HIS3EC2] 13.Elective (Non-Major Based) 3 2 25 75 100 Science, Technology and Society [HIS3EDC2] 14. Project Work 10 25 75 100 Semester 15. Human Rights 6 5 25 75 100 – IV [HIS4CC10] Credits-21 16. International 6 5 25 75 100 Relations [HIS4CC11] 17. Environmental 6 5 25 75 100 History [HIS4CC12 ] 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmk from 1949 – 1956
    Scope International Journal of Science, Humanities, Management and Technology. ISSN : 2455-068X Vol.4 Issue 3 (2018) 48 - 55. Submitted 12/07/2018. Published 13/08/2018 LINGUSTIC POLICY OF DMK FROM 1949 – 1956 Dr. R.DHANABAL Assistant Professor in History Government Arts College for Women Salem-8. The DMK concentrating on reformative politics in Tamil Nadu during 1949-56. Language strategists are those figures who innovate prudently to promote linguistic interests. As a basic strategy the DMK preached the antiquity and achievements of the distant past of the Tamils. An ethnic group becomes a nationality when it has an image of its collective past and when its members are aware of and responsive to that image. The DMK men used to enter into villages and towns with microphone and amplifiers and create a festive climate by drapery, decoration of red and black party flags, and playing cinema records before they started their sermons. They would tell the people very seriously with all sincerity that the local people were the honourable sons and daughters of those great grand ancestors who lived in affluence and that their ancient rulers were great kings, seamen, conquerors but never intending to rule other people.In a society which believed in untouchability, they went to address the local gathering, they used to dine with the local leaders. In the party, they developed family-like relationships. The leaders were treated as elder brothers. The party men who developed the necessary oratorical talent could exaggerate the prevailing state of affairs. They would shed tears to narrate the sufferings of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Business and Politics in Tamil Nadu
    Business and Politics in Tamil Nadu John Harriss with Andrew Wyatt Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 50/2016 | March 2016 Simons Papers in Security and Development No. 50/2016 2 The Simons Papers in Security and Development are edited and published at the School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University. The papers serve to disseminate research work in progress by the School’s faculty and associated and visiting scholars. Our aim is to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. Inclusion of a paper in the series should not limit subsequent publication in any other venue. All papers can be downloaded free of charge from our website, www.sfu.ca/internationalstudies. The series is supported by the Simons Foundation. Series editor: Jeffrey T. Checkel Managing editor: Martha Snodgrass Harriss, John and Wyatt, Andrew, Business and Politics in Tamil Nadu, Simons Papers in Security and Development, No. 50/2016, School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, March 2016. ISSN 1922-5725 Copyright remains with the author. Reproduction for other purposes than personal research, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the author(s). If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), the title, the working paper number and year, and the publisher. Copyright for this issue: John Harriss, jharriss (at) sfu.ca. School for International Studies Simon Fraser University Suite 7200 - 515 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6B 5K3 Business and Politics in Tamil Nadu 3 Business and Politics in Tamil Nadu Simons Papers in Security and Development No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Patronage and Populism in the State of Tamil Nadu India
    ERPI 2018 International Conference Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Conference Paper No.24 Title-Bovine Nationalism: The Story of Patronage and Populism in the State of Tamil Nadu, India Dr. Lavanya Suresh 17-18 March 2018 International Institute of Social Studies (ISS) in The Hague, Netherlands Organized jointly by: In collaboration with: Disclaimer: The views expressed here are solely those of the authors in their private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of organizers and funders of the conference. March, 2018 Check regular updates via ERPI website: www.iss.nl/erpi ERPI 2018 International Conference - Authoritarian Populism and the Rural World Title-Bovine Nationalism: The Story of Patronage and Populism in the State of Tamil Nadu, India Dr. Lavanya Suresh Introduction The death of the sitting Chief Minister of the State of Tamil Nadu and the head of the ruling party All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), J. Jayalalithaa, on 6th December, 2016 destabilised a two-party dominated system of elections. From the 1970’s onward Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and its political rival All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) have been the major parties in the State and represented the Dravidian politics in the region. After the death of the head of the AIADMK, Jayalalithaa, a close aid of hers V.K. Sasikala, tried to take over, but on 14 February 2017, a two-bench Supreme Court jury pronounced her guilty and ordered her immediate arrest in a disproportionate-assets case, effectively ending her Chief Ministerial ambitions. This has led to political turmoil in the state, which has been capitalised on by the right-wing party that controls the central government, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
    [Show full text]