Parasiten Von Zackenbarschen Als Biologische Indikatoren in Südostasien: Anthropogene Verschmutzung Und Aquakulturverfahren

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasiten Von Zackenbarschen Als Biologische Indikatoren in Südostasien: Anthropogene Verschmutzung Und Aquakulturverfahren Parasiten von Zackenbarschen als biologische Indikatoren in Südostasien: Anthropogene Verschmutzung und Aquakulturverfahren Kumulative Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Rostock vorgelegt von Kilian Neubert geboren am 07.06.1983 in Schwerin Rostock, 2018 Betreuer und erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Harry W. Palm Professur für Aquakultur und Sea-Ranching, Universität Rostock Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. habil. Wilhelm Hagen Fachbereich 02: Biologie/Chemie, Universität Bremen Jahr der Einreichung: 2018 Jahr der Verteidigung: 2018 „First to doubt, then to inquire, and then to discover!” Henry Thomas Buckle Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Zusammenfassende Darlegung ....................................................................... 1 1.1 Kurzfassung ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Zusammenfassung ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1.2 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Einleitung ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Parasitische Lebenszyklen als Grundlage der biologischen Umweltindikation ........... 3 1.2.2 Fischparasiten als biologische Indikatoren .................................................................. 4 1.2.3 Die Biodiversität Südostasiens: Chance und Herausforderung für die biologische Umweltindikation anhand von Fischparasiten ................................................... 7 1.3 Die untersuchten Zackenbarscharten ............................................................................. 8 1.3.1 Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822) ....................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Epinephelus ongus (Bloch, 1790) ................................................................................ 9 1.3.3 Als Vergleichsorganismen genutzte Epinephelus-Arten vorangegangener Studien .................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Untersuchungsgebiete ..................................................................................................... 12 1.5 Arbeitshypothesen ........................................................................................................... 14 1.6 Diskussion ........................................................................................................................ 14 1.6.1 Die nachgewiesene Parasitenfauna ............................................................................ 14 1.6.2 Parasitenarten und parasitologische Indices mit Indikatorfunktion ........................... 16 1.6.3 Die Entwicklung des Star Graph Systems als Hilfsmittel der parasitenbasierten biologischen Indikation ......................................................................... 26 1.6.4 Die Verschmutzungsampel (Pollution Light) als Ergänzung des Star Graph Systems ............................................................................................................. 29 1.6.5 Indikation anthropogener Verschmutzung in indonesischen Küstengewässern mithilfe des Star Graph Systems und der Verschmutzungsampel ...................................... 30 1.6.6 Parasitierungsmuster der untersuchten Zackenbarsche in indonesischen Gewässern.................................................................................................... 32 1.6.7 Bewertung von Aquakulturanlagen in Vietnam unter Anwendung des Star Graph Systems und der Aquakulturampel ............................................................. 35 1.6.8 Die Fischgröße ........................................................................................................... 37 1.6.9 Das Potenzial von Fischparasiten als Umweltindikatoren im südostasiatischen Raum ................................................................................................. 38 1.7 Ausblick............................................................................................................................ 39 1.8 Literaturverzeichnis ........................................................................................................ 41 1.9 Erklärung über den Eigenanteil an den Veröffentlichungen ...................................... 68 2. Veröffentlichungen ......................................................................................... 70 2.1 Neubert K., Yulianto I., Kleinertz S., Theisen S., Wiryawan, Palm H. W. (2016): Parasite fauna of white-streaked grouper, Epinephelus ongus (Bloch, 1790) (Epinephelidae) from Karimunjawa, Indonesia. Parasitology Open 2 (e12), 1-11. ......... 70 2.2 Neubert K., Yulianto I., Theisen S., Kleinertz S., Palm, H. W. (2016): Parasite fauna of Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822) (Epinephelidae) as environmental indicator under heavily polluted conditions in Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 110, 747-756. .......................................................................................................................... 82 2.3 Truong, T. V., Neubert, K., Unger, P., Bui, T. Q., Ngo, H. T. T., Palm, H. W. und Kleinertz, S. (2017): Assessment of Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822) aquaculture systems in the Gulf of Tonkin, Vietnam, by using fish parasites. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 2017; 00, 1-12..................................................................................................... 93 3. Selbstständigkeitserklärung ........................................................................ 106 4. Curriculum vitae .......................................................................................... 107 5. Danksagung .................................................................................................. 110 6. Anhang .......................................................................................................... 111 Abbildungsverzeichnis Abbildung 1. Die parasitologisch untersuchten Zackenbarscharten. ......................................... 12 Abbildung 2. Berücksichtigte Standorte. ................................................................................... 13 Abbildung 3. Anteil von Epinephelus ongus an den angelandeten Zackenbarschen im Karimunjawa Nationalpark. In: Neubert et al. 2016a (Seite 3) ................................................. 73 Abbildung 4. Multidimensionale Skalierung (nach Bray-Curtis-Ähnlichkeit) der analysierten Zackenbarscharten basierend auf der Parasitengemeinschaft in indonesischen Küstengewässern. In: Neubert et al. 2016a (Seite 6) .............................................................................................. 76 Abbildung 5. Star Graphen für die Gewässer von Bali und Jakarta. In: Neubert et al. 2016b (Seite 752) ........................................................................................................................ 88 Abbildung 6. Star Graphen für die Segara Anakan Lagune. In: Neubert et al. 2016b (Seite753) .................................................................................................................................... 89 Abbildung 7. Star Graph für die Bucht von Ringgung. Neubert et al. 2016b (Seite 753) ....... 89 Abbildung 8. Die Verschmutzungsampel. In: Neubert et al. 2016b (Seite 754) ...................... 90 Abbildung 9. Hierarchische Clusteranalyse der beprobten Standorte in Indonesien basierend auf den normalisierten parasitologischen Parametern von Epinephelus coioides. ............................ 90 Abbildung 10. Star Graphen für Aquakulturanlagen in Vietnam. In: Truong et al. 2017 (Seite 6) ....................................................................................................................................... 99 Abbildung 11. Die Aquakulturampel. In: Truong et al. 2017 (Seite 7) .................................. 100 Abbildung 12. Multidimensionale Skalierung (nach Bray-Curtis-Ähnlichkeit) der analysierten Zackenbarschzuchten basierend auf den Parasiten von Epinephelus coioides. In: Truong et al. 2017 (Seite 7) ............................................................................................................................ 100 Tabellenverzeichnis Tabelle 1. Prävalenz in % (P), mittlere Intensität (Im), Intensität (I) und mittlere Abundanz (Am) der nachgewiesenen Parasiten von Epinephelus ongus aus den Gewässern des Karimunjawa Nationalparks sowie parasitologische Indices mit potenzieller biologische Indikatorfunktion. In: Neubert et al. 2016a (Seite 4) .................................................................................................... 74 Tabelle 2. Vergleich der für Epinephelus areolatus, E. coioides, E. fuscoguttatus und E. ongus in indonesischen Küstengewässern nachgewiesenen metazoischen Parasiten. In: Neubert et al. 2016a (Seite 5) ............................................................................................................................ 75 Tabelle 3. Prävalenz in % (P), mittlere Intensität (Im), Intensität (I) und mittlere Abundanz (Am) der nachgewiesenen Parasiten von Epinephelus coioides aus bzw. vor der Bucht von Jakarta sowie für die biologische Indikation von Umweltverschmutzung relevante parasitologische Indices. In: Neubert et al. 2016b (Seite 749)
Recommended publications
  • Some Digenetic Trematodes of Oregon's Tidepool
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF JAMES RAYMOND HALL for the M. A. (Name) (Degree) in ZOOLOGY presented on \. ; I f(c.'t' (Major) (Date) Title: SOME DIGENETIC TREMATODES OF OREGON'S TIDEPOOL COTTIDS Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Ivan Pratt The host fish for this study were collected from January through June of 1965. Tidepools were selected at Bar View, Cape Arago, Neptune State Park, Seal Rock, and Yaquina Head. Of the 187 fish examined, 132 were infected. The following host fishes yielded the following parasites. New Host records are indicated with an asterisk. Clinocottus acuticeps (Gilbert) contained *Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934; C. embryum (Jordan and Starks) contained Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934; C. globiceps (Girard) contained *Genolinea laticauda Manter, 1925, *Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934, Podocotyle atomon (Rudolphi, 1802), P. blennicottusi Park, 1937, P. pacifica Park, 1937 *P. reflexa (Creplin, 1825), and *Zoogonoides viviparus (Olsson, 1868); Oligocottus snyderi Girard contained *Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934, *Podocotyle californica Park, 1937, and *Zoogonoides viviparus (Olsson, 1868); O. maculosus Girard con- tained *Genolinea laticauda Manter, 1925, ,:cLecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934, *Podocotyle californica Park, 1937, and P. pedunculata Park, 1937. The following species of digenetic trematodes are described in detail: Genolinea laticauda Manter, 1925, Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934, Podocotyle blennicottusi Park, 1937, P. californica Park, 1937, P. pacifica Park, 1937, P. pedunculata Park, 1937, and Zoogonoides viviparus (Olsson, 1868). Variations from the original descriptions are discussed in the following species: Genolinea laticauda Manter, 1925, Lecithaster salmonis Yamaguti, 1934, Podocotyle blennicottusi Park, 1937, P. californica Park, 1937, P. pacifica Park, 1937, and Zoogonoides viviparus (Olsson, 1868).
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Fisheries Report an Update Through 2008
    STATUS OF THE FISHERIES REPORT AN UPDATE THROUGH 2008 Photo credit: Edgar Roberts. Report to the California Fish and Game Commission as directed by the Marine Life Management Act of 1998 Prepared by California Department of Fish and Game Marine Region August 2010 Acknowledgements Many of the fishery reviews in this report are updates of the reviews contained in California’s Living Marine Resources: A Status Report published in 2001. California’s Living Marine Resources provides a complete review of California’s three major marine ecosystems (nearshore, offshore, and bays and estuaries) and all the important plants and marine animals that dwell there. This report, along with the Updates for 2003 and 2006, is available on the Department’s website. All the reviews in this report were contributed by California Department of Fish and Game biologists unless another affiliation is indicated. Author’s names and email addresses are provided with each review. The Editor would like to thank the contributors for their efforts. All the contributors endeavored to make their reviews as accurate and up-to-date as possible. Additionally, thanks go to the photographers whose photos are included in this report. Editor Traci Larinto Senior Marine Biologist Specialist California Department of Fish and Game [email protected] Status of the Fisheries Report 2008 ii Table of Contents 1 Coonstripe Shrimp, Pandalus danae .................................................................1-1 2 Kellet’s Whelk, Kelletia kelletii ...........................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Phylogeny of the Digenean Family Opecoelidae Ozaki, 1925 and the Value of Morphological Characters, with the Erection of a New Subfamily
    © Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre CAS Folia Parasitologica 2016, 63: 013 doi: 10.14411/fp.2016.013 http://folia.paru.cas.cz Research Article The molecular phylogeny of the digenean family Opecoelidae Ozaki, 1925 and the value of morphological characters, with the erection of a new subfamily Rodney A. Bray1, Thomas H. Cribb2, D. Timothy J. Littlewood1 and Andrea Waeschenbach1 1 Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK; 2 School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia Abstract: Large and small rDNA sequences of 41 species of the family Opecoelidae are utilised to produce phylogenetic inference trees, using brachycladioids and lepocreadioids as outgroups. Sequences were newly generated for 13 species. The resulting Bayesian trees show a monophyletic Opecoelidae. The earliest divergent group is the Stenakrinae, based on two species which are not of the type-genus. The next well-supported clade to diverge is constituted of three species of Helicometra Odhner, 1902. Based on this tree and the characters of the egg and uterus, a new subfamily, the Helicometrinae, is erected and defined to include the generaHelicometra , Helicometrina Linton, 1910 and Neohelicometra Siddiqi et Cable, 1960. The subfamily Opecoelinae is found to be monophyletic, but the Plagioporinae is paraphyletic. The single representative of the Opecoelininae (not of the type genus) is nested within a group of deep-sea ‘plagioporines’. The two representatives of the Opistholebetidae are embedded within a group of shallow-water ‘plagioporine’ species. The Opistholebetidae is reduced to subfamily status pro tem as its morphological and biological characteristics are distinctive.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowfin Trawling Fish Images 2013 09 16
    Fishes captured aboard the RV Yellowfin in otter trawls: September 2013 Order: Aulopiformes Family: Synodontidae Species: Synodus lucioceps common name: California lizardfish Order: Gadiformes Family: Merlucciidae Species: Merluccius productus common name: Pacific hake Order: Ophidiiformes Family: Ophidiidae Species: Chilara taylori common name: spotted cusk-eel plainfin specklefin Order: Batrachoidiformes Family: Batrachoididae Species: Porichthys notatus & P. myriaster common name: plainfin & specklefin midshipman plainfin specklefin Order: Batrachoidiformes Family: Batrachoididae Species: Porichthys notatus & P. myriaster common name: plainfin & specklefin midshipman plainfin specklefin Order: Batrachoidiformes Family: Batrachoididae Species: Porichthys notatus & P. myriaster common name: plainfin & specklefin midshipman Order: Gasterosteiformes Family: Syngnathidae Species: Syngnathus leptorynchus common name: bay pipefish Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes semicinctus common name: halfbanded rockfish Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes dalli common name: calico rockfish Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes saxicola common name: stripetail rockfish Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes diploproa common name: splitnose rockfish Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes rosenblatti common name: greenblotched rockfish juvenile Order: Scorpaeniformes Family: Scorpaenidae Species: Sebastes levis common name: cowcod Order:
    [Show full text]
  • Ahead of Print Online Version New Genus of Opecoelid Trematode From
    Ahead of print online version FoliA PArAsitologicA 61 [3]: 223–230, 2014 © institute of Parasitology, Biology centre Ascr issN 0015-5683 (print), issN 1803-6465 (online) http://folia.paru.cas.cz/ doi: 10.14411/fp.2014.033 New genus of opecoelid trematode from Pristipomoides aquilonaris (Perciformes: Lutjanidae) and its phylogenetic affinity within the family Opecoelidae Michael J. Andres, Eric E. Pulis and Robin M. Overstreet Department of coastal sciences, University of southern Mississippi, ocean springs, Mississippi, UsA Abstract: Bentholebouria colubrosa gen. n. et sp. n. (Digenea: opecoelidae) is described in the wenchman, Pristipomoides aq- uilonaris (goode et Bean), from the eastern gulf of Mexico, and new combinations are proposed: Bentholebouria blatta (Bray et Justine, 2009) comb. n., Bentholebouria longisaccula (Yamaguti, 1970) comb. n., Bentholebouria rooseveltiae (Yamaguti, 1970) comb. n., and Bentholebouria ulaula (Yamaguti, 1970) comb. n. the new genus is morphologically similar to Neolebouria gibson, 1976, but with a longer cirrus sac, entire testes, a rounded posterior margin with a cleft, and an apparent restriction to the deepwater snappers. Morphologically, the new species is closest to B. blatta from Pristipomoides argyrogrammicus (Valenciennes) off New caledonia but can be differentiated by the nature of the internal seminal vesicle (2–6 turns or loops rather than constrictions), a longer internal seminal vesicle (occupying about 65% rather than 50% of the cirrus sac), a cirrus sac that extends further into the hindbody (averaging 136% rather than 103% of the distance from the posterior margin of the ventral sucker to the ovary), and a narrower body (27% rather than 35% mean width as % of body length).
    [Show full text]
  • In the Eye of Arrowtooth Flounder, Atherestes Stomias, and Rex Sole, Glyptocephalus Zachirus, from British Columbia
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2005 The Pathologic Copepod Phrixocephalus cincinnatus (Copepoda: Pennellidae) in the Eye of Arrowtooth Flounder, Atherestes stomias, and Rex Sole, Glyptocephalus zachirus, from British Columbia Reginald B. Blaylock Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, [email protected] Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, [email protected] Alexandra B. Morton Raincoast Research Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Blaylock, Reginald B.; Overstreet, Robin M.; and Morton, Alexandra B., "The Pathologic Copepod Phrixocephalus cincinnatus (Copepoda: Pennellidae) in the Eye of Arrowtooth Flounder, Atherestes stomias, and Rex Sole, Glyptocephalus zachirus, from British Columbia" (2005). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 458. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/458 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Bull. Eur. Ass. Fish Pathol., 25(3) 2005, 116 The pathogenic copepod Phrixocephalus cincinnatus (Copepoda: Pennellidae) in the eye of arrowtooth flounder, Atherestes stomias, and rex sole, Glyptocephalus zachirus, from British Columbia R.B. Blaylock1*, R.M. Overstreet1 and A. Morton2 1 Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, The University of Southern Mississippi, P.O. Box 7000, Ocean Springs, MS 39566-7000; 2 Raincoast Research, Simoom Sound, BC, Canada V0P 1S0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bathymetric Distribution of the Digenean Parasites of Deep-Sea Fishes
    FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 51: 268–274, 2004 The bathymetric distribution of the digenean parasites of deep-sea fishes Rodney A. Bray Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Key words: deep sea, bathymetry, Digenea, Lepocreadiidae, Fellodistomidae, Derogenidae, Hemiuridae Abstract. The bathymetric range of 149 digenean species recorded deeper than 200 m, the approximate depth of the continental shelf/slope break, are presented in graphical form. It is found that only representatives of the four families Lepocreadiidae, Fellodistomidae, Derogenidae and Hemiuridae reach to abyssal regions (>4,000 m). Three other families, the Lecithasteridae, Zoogonidae and Opecoelidae, have truly deep-water forms reaching deeper than 3,000 m. Bathymetric data are available for the Acanthocolpidae, Accacoeliidae, Bucephalidae, Cryptogonimidae, Faustulidae, Gorgoderidae, Monorchiidae and Sanguini- colidae showing that they reach deeper than 200 m. No bathymetric data are available for the members of the Bivesiculidae and Hirudinellidae which are reported from deep-sea hosts. These results indicate that only seventeen out of the 150 or so digenean families are reported in the deep sea. Study of the digenean parasites of deep-sea fishes has lineation of deep-sea records in the context of the data- been spasmodic and scattered. If, as Ronald O’Dor, base was based on the depth data greater than 200 m, chief scientist for the ‘Census of Marine Life’, is when given, but if these data were not available, the reported to have said (Henderson 2003), ‘There’s more species of host was used as an indicator that the record than 99.9 per cent of the ocean that has not been was likely to be from the deep sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrastructure of the Spermatozoon of Macvicaria Obovata (Digenea, Opecoelidae), A
    Manuscript Click here to download Manuscript Macvicaria obovata_ActaParasitol_REV.doc Ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of Macvicaria obovata (Digenea, Opecoelidae), a parasite of Sparus aurata (Pisces, Teleostei) from the Gulf of Gabès, Mediterranean Sea Hichem Kacem1,*, Yann Quilichini2, Lassad Neifar1, Jordi Torres3,4 and Jordi Miquel3,4 1Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia; 2CNRS UMR 6134, University of Corsica, Laboratory “Parasites and Mediterranean Ecosystems”, 20250 Corte, Corsica, France; 3Secció de Parasitologia, Departament de Biologia, Sanitat i Medi Ambient, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències l’Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII, s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; 4Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal, 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Running title: Spermatozoon of Macvicaria obovata ∗Corresponding author: Hichem Kacem, Laboratoire de Biodiversité et Ecosystèmes Aquatiques, Département des Sciences de la Vie, Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, BP 1171, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia. Email: [email protected]; Phone: (+216) 98 48 34 26; Fax: (+216) 74 27 64 00 Abstract The ultrastructural organization of the spermatozoon of the digenean Macvicaria obovata (Opecoelidae) is described by transmission electron microscopy. Alive digeneans were collected from the digestive tract of Sparus aurata (Teleostei, Sparidae), caught from the Gulf of Gabès in Chebba, Tunisia (Eastern Mediterranean Sea). The male gamete of M. obovata is a filiform cell, tapered at both extremities and exhibits typical characters such as two axonemes of different lengths showing the 9+‘1’ trepaxonematan pattern, a nucleus, mitochondria, two bundles of parallel cortical microtubules, external ornamentation of the plasma membrane, spine-like bodies and granules of glycogen.
    [Show full text]
  • Digenean Trematodes of Fishes from Deep-Sea Areas Off the Pacific Coast of Northern Honshu, Japan
    Deep-sea Fauna and Pollutants off Pacifi c Coast of Northern Japan, edited by T. Fujita, National Museum of Nature and Science Monographs, No. 39, pp. 25-37, 2009 Digenean Trematodes of Fishes from Deep-sea Areas off the Pacifi c Coast of Northern Honshu, Japan Toshiaki Kuramochi Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 3̶23̶1 Hyakunincho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 169̶0073 Japan E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Thirty-two species plus nine unidentifi ed forms of digenean trematodes from 10 families, Bucepha- lidae, Fellodistomidae, Lepocreadiidae, Acanthocolpidae, Opecoelidae, Zoogonidae, Hemiuridae, Accacoeli- dae, Derogenidae and Lecithasteridae were recognized from 31 species of fi shes collected in deep-sea areas off the Pacifi c coast of northern Honshu, Japan. They are listed and several taxonomic and zoogeographic re- marks are given. A new combination, Tellervotrema katadara is also proposed. Key words: fi sh parasites, Digenea, deep-sea fi shes, the Pacifi c coast, Japan Introduction “Study on Deep-Sea Fauna and Conservation of Deep-Sea Ecosystem” organized by the Na- tional Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo (NSMT) has been conducted since 1993. For dige- nean parasites of fi shes, Machida and Kamegai (1997) reported 22 species of fi sh digeneans, in- cluding two new species, from deep-sea fi shes caught in Suruga Bay, off the Pacifi c coast of central Japan, as the fi rst phase of the investigation, followed by Kuramochi (2001) which recorded 12 species from anguilliform and gadiform fi shes from deep-sea areas of Tosa Bay off the Pacifi c coast of western Japan as the second phase and by Kuramochi (2005) which recorded 14 species from fi shes caught in deep-sea area off the Ryukyu Islands, the East China Sea, southern Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) and Supplementary Morphological Data for T
    Zootaxa 3986 (4): 435–451 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3986.4.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B84A49B3-F5F3-44AF-B270-038D6D28A4A2 Re-evaluation of Tellervotrema katadara (Kuramochi, 2001) Kuramochi, 2009 (Opecoelidae: Plagioporinae) and supplementary morphological data for T. beringi (Mamaev, 1965) Gibson & Bray, 1982 with new host and locality CHARLES K. BLEND1, TOSHIAKI KURAMOCHI2 & NORMAN O. DRONEN3 158 Rock Creek Drive, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-4214, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-4 Amakubo, Tsukuba City, 305-0005 Ibaraki, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 2258 TAMU, College Station, Texas 77843-2258, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The trematode genus Tellervotrema Gibson & Bray, 1982 was erected for Podocotyle-like species that parasitize archy- benthal macrourid fishes (also known as grenadiers or rattails) and that possess no vitelline follicles dorsal to the ceca but do have a symmetrical pair of isolated groups of vitelline follicles in the posterior forebody. Tellervotrema katadara (Kuramochi, 2001) Kuramochi, 2009 is resurrected as a valid species based on an examination and re-description of ho- lotype and paratype specimens collected from the intestine of the bathygadine macrourid Gadomus colletti Jordan & Gil- bert from 518–582 m depth in Tosa Bay, off the Pacific coast of southern Japan.
    [Show full text]