DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 111 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 156 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2010 No. 154 House of Representatives The House met at 10:30 a.m. and was almost a year. Despite the urgent need both political parties, I believe there is called to order by the Speaker pro tem- to ratify this vital treaty which also a better way. I believe that we can pore (Mr. SALAZAR). reduces unneeded nuclear stockpiles renew American exceptionalism by re- f and builds much-needed confidence turning our national policy to the prin- with Russia, some members in the ciples and practices that made this DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO other body have continued to stall, economy and our economy the freest TEMPORE putting politics ahead of national secu- and most prosperous in the history of The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- rity. the world. I believe if we return to the fore the House the following commu- START has been through 18 hearings, practice of those principles, as I said nication from the Speaker: is endorsed by dozens of foreign policy yesterday in Detroit, that we can re- WASHINGTON, DC, and defense experts, and passed out of store and rebuild our economy. November 30, 2010. committee with a strong bipartisan Fiscal discipline is where it all be- I hereby appoint the Honorable JOHN T. majority. Our colleagues on the other gins, though. We have to put our fiscal SALAZAR to act as Speaker pro tempore on side of the aisle claim to be the strong- house in order, and clearly the Amer- this day. est proponents of national security; ican people on November 2 sent a deaf- NANCY PELOSI, ratification of START is an oppor- ening message to policymakers here in Speaker of the House of Representatives. tunity for them to act on those claims Washington, DC. that they want a gov- f and keep America and our allies safe. ernment that lives within their means MORNING-HOUR DEBATE f again. Fortunately, there is no short- age these days of ideas about putting The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- RENEWING AMERICAN our fiscal house in order: admirable ant to the order of the House of Janu- EXCEPTIONALISM suggestions of the President’s Debt ary 6, 2009, the Chair will now recog- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Commission that we will learn more nize Members from lists submitted by Chair recognizes the gentleman from about this week; the Republicans’ the majority and minority leaders for Indiana (Mr. PENCE) for 5 minutes. Pledge to America; there are thought- morning-hour debate. Mr. PENCE. Mr. Speaker, I rise ful proposals and blueprints by Mem- The Chair will alternate recognition today, the day after I had the privilege bers of Congress in both political par- between the parties, with each party of speaking at one of the storied venues ties, and I commend them all. limited to 30 minutes and each Mem- in American public life. The Detroit On my part, I have coauthored legis- ber, other than the majority and mi- Economic Club for 75 years has been a lation to establish a constitutional nority leaders and the minority whip, place where American leaders of every spending limit amendment. I think it limited to 5 minutes. political persuasion and philosophy is time that we limited Federal spend- f have come to talk about the economy ing to 20 percent of our economy in the of this Nation. I had the real privilege Constitution of the United States of RATIFY START IMMEDIATELY of being able to address that gathering America. We have a saying back in In- The SPEAKER pro tempore. The yesterday, and I want to express my diana, Mr. Speaker, that good fences Chair recognizes the gentleman from appreciation to the organizers and the make good neighbors. I think we ought Illinois (Mr. QUIGLEY) for 1 minute. board for that. But I thought I might to use the Constitution of the United Mr. QUIGLEY. Mr. Speaker, I rise reflect for a few minutes this morning States in the years ahead to put fence today to urge my colleagues in the on my comments because what I lines around spending to give this and Senate to ratify the Strategic Arms sought to do at the Detroit Economic future Congresses a clear guideline of Reduction Treaty or START imme- Club yesterday was really broaden the just how much of the American econ- diately because every day we wait to debate here in Washington, DC. omy this government can consume, and ratify START is one more day that We live in no ordinary times. Our to give them an incentive for growth. Russia’s nuclear arsenal goes economy is struggling in the city and But let me say, fiscal discipline alone uninspected. on the farm. Unemployment is at a will not be enough to bring jobs and When our last nuclear arms treaty heartbreaking 9.6 percent nationally; prosperity back to America. We need with Russia expired last December, so 42 million Americans are on food an agenda for growth, and that is what did our ability to inspect their nuclear stamps; and America has seen better brought me to Detroit yesterday. What sites. This means no Americans have days. After years of runaway Federal I described and sought to describe were inspected Russian nuclear facilities for spending, borrowing and bailouts by the building blocks, the traditional b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H7645 . VerDate Mar 15 2010 05:15 Dec 01, 2010 Jkt 099060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A30NO7.000 H30NOPT1 tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with HOUSE H7646 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE November 30, 2010 American building blocks of growth, an Beth Chappell and all the members of the Taxpayer funded bailouts are no substitute incentive-based agenda. I think it is Detroit Economic Club for hosting me. For for economic policies that will create real five-fold. First is sound monetary pol- 75 years, the Detroit Economic Club has been consumer demand. I have no doubt that icy. Second is not only tax relief but a premier venue for leaders interested in say- American automakers and autoworkers can ing something significant about our econ- compete and win in a growing American tax reform. Third is access to all Amer- omy and I am genuinely grateful to be able economy. ican resources in energy. Fourth is reg- to join the ranks of those who had the privi- To restore American exceptionalism, we ulatory relief and reform. And finally, lege to ‘‘say it here.’’ must end all this Keynesian spending and get it is expanded international trade. S-T- And it’s great to be in Detroit—home to back to the practice of free market econom- A-R-T. I believe that it is a prescrip- Motown, the Lions (you know who this Colts ics. The freedom to succeed must include the tion for a fresh start in the American fan was cheering for on Thanksgiving) and freedom to fail. The free market is what economy. And what I expanded on yes- the ‘‘Car Capital of the World.’’ made America’s economy the greatest in the My father ran a chain of gas stations so, world, and we cannot falter in our willing- terday was my belief that if we will in like most Americans, I have had a life long ness to defend it. this next Congress which will gather love affair with the automobile. Try to imag- Even though our economy is struggling just weeks from now, if we from both ine America without the Ford Mustang, the and America seems at a low point, I believe ends of Pennsylvania Avenue will re- Chevrolet Corvette, or the Dodge Charger. we can restore our economy but it will take pair to these ideas and seek to advance Being from Indiana, I am especially proud vision and courage to do it. And everything not the arguments that are happening of the role that Hoosiers have played and starts with putting our fiscal house in order. in Washington even at this very hour continue to play in this unique American in- The good news is there is no shortage of dustry. And it all started here in Detroit. at the White House, do we preserve tax plans for fiscal discipline in Washington America owes a debt to the ingenuity and these days. We have the Pledge to America, rates, do we let some tax rates expire entrepreneurism of this great city. You the president’s Debt Commission, and over and become tax increases, but rather helped define the character of a nation. time we’ve had budgets, blueprints, outlines, how do we really pursue policies that But Detroit and America have seen better and thoughtful proposals from Members of will release the trapped energy in this days and I come to this storied podium to Congress, and blue-ribbon panels. economy. say after years of runaway federal spending, For my part, I believe the answer is a Some experts suggest that there is borrowing and bailouts by both political par- Spending Limit Amendment to the Constitu- more than $2 trillion in profits on the ties, that there is a better way, a way we can tion. Since World War II the federal govern- renew American exceptionalism by returning sidelines in this economy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Rights in Montana Handbook
    April 2014 This document has been updated to reflect Montana statute and rules as of April 2014. Montana Department of Natural Legislative Environmental Resources and Conservation Quality Council P.O. Box 201601 P.O. Box 201704 Helena, MT 59620-1601 Helena, MT 59620-1704 Phone (406) 444-2074 Phone (406) 444-3742 dnrc.mt.gov leg.mt.gov/eqc Montana University System Water Center 23 Faculty Court Montana State University-Bozeman Bozeman, MT 59717-2690 Phone (406) 994-6690 watercenter.montana.edu Acknowledgment Water Rights in Montana is a compilation of two previous citizen guides discussing Montana water rights—the Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation’s Water Rights in Montana and the Environmental Quality Council’s and Montana University System Water Center’s Wading into Montana Water Rights. We would like to thank the authors of the latter guide, Michelle Bryan and Professor Gerald L. Westesen, for their significant contribution to this publication. i ii Disclaimer Water Rights in Montana should not be used as a legal reference. When in doubt, always refer to the MONTANA CODE ANNOTATED or the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation ADMINISTRATIVE RULES OF MONTANA.1 When making any legal judgments on the adequacy or completeness of procedure, always consult your own legal counsel. 1 Terms that are capitalized and underlined are further defined or explained in the glossary at the end of the publication. iii iv Table of Contents Acknowledgment ....................................................................................... i Disclaimer ................................................................................................. iii Background of Water Rights in Montana .................................................. 1 Montana Water Use Act ............................................................................ 2 Water Rights Administration ..................................................................... 3 Adjudication of Existing Water Rights ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Do you havethese indispensable works in your referencelibrary? All priceshave been revised and most have been drastically reduced as of Octoberfirst, nineteen forty one. INDEX TO •THE AUK' The 10-YearIndex contains in onehandy volume references to all authors,localities, bird namesand publicationsreviewed that have appearedin 'The Auk' duringthe ten yearsconsidered. Subjects andtopics are indexedfully. Invaluablefor compilingthe litera- ture on any ornithologicalsubject. Volume 1 to 17, 1884-1900 Bound $3.00 Unbound $2.00 l also includesindex to the Nuttall Bulletin) Volume 18 to 27, 1901-1910 out-o/-print Unbound$2.00 Volume 28 to 37, 1911-1920 Bound $3.00 Unbound $2.00 Volume 30ø to 47, 1921-1930 Bound $3.00 Unbound $2.00 Volume 48 to 57, 1931-1940 in prepareion CHECK-LIST OF NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS Second Edition 1895 $1.00 Abridged Edition 1935 .50 (an abstracto/the 1931 Fourth Edition) The First,Third and FourthEditions are out-of-print The Fifth Editionis now beingprepared and will be published within the year CODE OF NOMENCLATURE First Edition 1892 $ .25 Revised Edition 1908 .50 FIFTY YEARS' PROGRESS IN ORNITHOLOGY. $1.00 On its fiftieth anniversaryin 1935 the Union publishedthis vol- ume of historical surveys. More facts are containedin its 200 pagesabout the marchof ornithologicalstudy in thiscountry and abroadthan in any other medium. Someof the titles: Bird Pro- tection,Photography, Economic Ornithology, Exhibition, Study Collections, etc. BO0# relatingto NATURAL HISTORY Out-of-print titles . ß . diligently sought for List issued yearly CHECK-LIST OF THE BIBLIOPHILE NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS 1836 N. HIGH STREET Abridged form o[ the out-o[-print COLUMBUS, OHIO Fourth Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • A Buyer's Guide to Montana Water Rights
    A Buyer’s Guide To Montana Water Rights By Stan Bradshaw Trout Unlimited, Montana Water Project A Cautionary Tale his tale is based on real events. I’ve just changed the names, details of the water right, the specific facts of the dispute, T and the location to avoid undue embarrassment to anyone. In 2002, Michael Hartman looked at a ranch for sale on a major tributary in the upper Missouri river basin. It was 1100 acres with frontage on a trout stream, and it had an active sprinkler-irrigated hay operation on 160 acres. When Hartmann was negotiating the deal, the realtor produced a water rights document entitled “Statement of Existing Water Right Claim” (“Statement of Claim” for our purposes). It included a water right number, identified a flow rate of 10 cubic feet per second (cfs), and 320 irrigated acres, complete with a legal description of the acres irrigated. It seemed like a great deal—nice property right on a famous trout stream, and a whole lot of water rights to work with. What’s not to like? So he bought it. After moving on to the land, Hartman looked at the acres claimed for irrigation in the Statement of Claim, located the 160 acres that weren’t currently being irrigated, and embarked on plans to start irrigating them. When he walked the land, he didn’t notice any sign of ditches or headgates on the quarter section he wanted to irrigate, but he figured, “Hey, it’s listed on the water right, so I have the water for it.” He approached the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) about cost sharing a new center pivot on the land and putting a pump into the ditch serving the other 160 acres, and they seemed interested.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunication
    Telecommunication 47 code of PARTS 70 TO 79 Revised as of October 1, 1999 CONTAINING A CODIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY AND FUTURE EFFECT AS OF OCTOBER 1, 1999 With Ancillaries Published by the Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Administration as a Special Edition of the Federal Register federal regulations VerDate 29<OCT>99 09:53 Nov 10, 1999 Jkt 183187 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 8091 Sfmt 8091 Y:\SGML\183187F.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 183187F U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1999 For sale by U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402±9328 VerDate 29<OCT>99 09:53 Nov 10, 1999 Jkt 183187 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183187F.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 183187F Table of Contents Page Explanation ................................................................................................ v Title 47: Chapter IÐFederal Communications Commission (Continued) ...... 3 Finding Aids: Material Approved for Incorporation by Reference ............................ 725 Table of CFR Titles and Chapters ....................................................... 727 Alphabetical List of Agencies Appearing in the CFR ......................... 745 Table of OMB Control Numbers .......................................................... 757 List of CFR Sections Affected ............................................................. 767 iii VerDate 15<DEC>99 04:03 Dec 21, 1999 Jkt 183187 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183187F.XXX pfrm02 PsN: 183187F Cite this Code: CFR To cite the regulations in this volume use title, part and section num- ber. Thus, 47 CFR 73.1 refers to title 47, part 73, section 1. iv VerDate 29<OCT>99 09:53 Nov 10, 1999 Jkt 183187 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 8092 Sfmt 8092 Y:\SGML\183187F.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 183187F Explanation The Code of Federal Regulations is a codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the Executive departments and agen- cies of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Water Court Aug £ 3 2005 PO Box 1389 Bozeman, MT 59771-1389 1-800-624-3270 (In-State Only) (406) 586-4364 Montana Water Court Fax: (406) 522-4131
    FILED C. Bruce Loble Chief Water Judge Montana Water Court AUg £ 3 2005 PO Box 1389 Bozeman, MT 59771-1389 1-800-624-3270 (In-state only) (406) 586-4364 Montana Water Court Fax: (406) 522-4131 IN THE WATER COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA UPPER MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION *********************************** IN THE MATTER OF THE ADJUDICATION ) CASE NO. WC-2000-02 OF EXISTING AND RESERVED RIGHTS TO ) THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE AND ) UNDERGROUND, OF THE RED ROCKS ) LAKE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE OF ) THE STATE OF MONTANA ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW APPROVING UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, RED ROCK LAKES-MONTANA COMPACT THIS MATTER came before the Court on a joint motion of the State of Montana and the United States of America for approval of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Red Rock Lakes - Montana Compact, Montana Code Ann. Section 85-20-801 (2004). Based on the submissions of the State and the United States, the Compact and the record in this case, the Court now issues the following: FINDINGS OF FACT General Adjudication of Water Rights 1. In 1979, the State of Montana commenced a comprehensive, general, state-wide adjudication of the rights to the use of water within the State of Montana, including all federal reserved and appropriative water rights, pursuant to Title 85, Chapter 2 of the Montana Code Annotated. Reserved Water Rights Compact Commission Negotiation 2. In 1979, the Montana Legislature stated its intent that the State of Montana attempt to conclude compacts for the equitable division and apportionment of waters between the state and its people and the federal government claiming reserved waters within the state.
    [Show full text]
  • YRC Spring Meeting
    MEETING NOTES Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Spring Meeting Conference Call and Go To Meeting April 12, 2011 The meeting was called to order at 9:00 a.m. by Jodee Pring. 1. Introductions Those on the call introduced themselves to the group. A listing of those participating on the call along with their contact information can be found at the end of these minutes. 2. Additions to Agenda Mary Sexton requested that item 12 on the agenda “Forming discussion for December Commission meeting on Federal Chair role – voting” be moved to the beginning of the agenda. All agreed to this change. 3. Forming discussion for December Commission meeting on Federal Chair role – voting Mark Anderson, Federal Chair, stated he was preparing a presentation to be given at the December full Commission meeting and would like to defer this discussion until that time. Mary Sexton agreed and stated that Montana would bring the information they had concerning this topic to the December meeting. 4. Hydrologic Update - MT and WY USGS Wayne Berkas, with the MT USGS, gave a PowerPoint presentation on the different gages in the basin and discussed each one briefly. Each slide shows the daily discharge from September 2009 to May 2011. For a copy of this presentation, go here. Yellowstone River at Corwin Springs, MT Clarks Fork Yellowstone River at Edgar, MT Little Bighorn River near Hardin, MT Bighorn River above Tullock Creek near Bighorn, MT – this gage is currently showing slightly above normal conditions Tongue River at State Line near Decker, MT – this gage is showing some spikes as some early melting has occurred Tongue River at Miles City, MT – last year, the peak flow dropped after the ice came off Powder River at Moorhead, MT – the estimated discharges were verified with discharge measurements Powder River near Locate, MT – after the ice jams came off, the estimated discharges were verified with discharge measurements, this area had a lot of low elevation snow 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Quantifying Tribal Water Rights in North Dakota
    North Dakota Law Review Volume 84 Number 2 Article 5 1-1-2008 The Future of Quantifying Tribal Water Rights in North Dakota Erica Shively Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Shively, Erica (2008) "The Future of Quantifying Tribal Water Rights in North Dakota," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 84 : No. 2 , Article 5. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol84/iss2/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FUTURE OF QUANTIFYING TRIBAL WATER RIGHTS IN NORTH DAKOTA “When we talk about water, we call it mni wiconi, and that means water is life.”1 I. INTRODUCTION While there is no doubt that water is a cornerstone of life,2 water to many North Dakotans has often been both a blessing and a curse.3 From floods, droughts, and the failure of municipal water systems, to arguments both for and against the diversion of water from some of the state’s major bodies, North Dakota is not a stranger to water conflict.4 The disputes have involved the Devils Lake outlet,5 proposals to divert water from the Missouri River to supply the Red River Valley,6 and addressing issues of water shortage in the western part of the state.7 The debates have occurred between neighbors,8 between North Dakota and 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Title I—Chippewa Cree Tribe 10 of the Rocky Boy’S Res- 11 Ervation Indian Reserved 12 Water Rights Settlement
    106TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. 438 AN ACT To provide for the settlement of the water rights claims of the Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reserva- tion, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION. 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the ``Chippewa Cree Tribe 5 of The Rocky Boy's Reservation Indian Reserved Water 6 Rights Settlement and Water Supply Enhancement Act of 7 1999''. 2 1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 2 Congress finds thatÐ 3 (1) in fulfillment of its trust responsibility to 4 Indian tribes and to promote tribal sovereignty and 5 economic self-sufficiency, it is the policy of the 6 United States to settle the water rights claims of the 7 tribes without lengthy and costly litigation; 8 (2) the Rocky Boy's Reservation was estab- 9 lished as a homeland for the Chippewa Cree Tribe; 10 (3) adequate water for the Chippewa Cree 11 Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation is important 12 to a permanent, sustainable, and sovereign homeland 13 for the Tribe and its members; 14 (4) the sovereignty of the Chippewa Cree Tribe 15 and the economy of the Reservation depend on the 16 development of the water resources of the Reserva- 17 tion; 18 (5) the planning, design, and construction of 19 the facilities needed to utilize water supplies effec- 20 tively are necessary to the development of a viable 21 Reservation economy and to implementation of the 22 Chippewa Cree-Montana Water Rights Compact; 23 (6) the Rocky Boy's Reservation is located
    [Show full text]
  • Legislature Chugs Into Halftime
    WINTER TROUT LINE 2015 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited Legislature chugs into halftime Legislators nix he first 45 days of the Montana Legislature were a necessary mining scramble, though the number T by Bruce Farling of measures – and the amount of bonding bill controversy – affecting coldwater fisheries, water quality, instream alk abounds at the current legislative Legislative session about Montanans taking flows and stream access, seems less 2015 Session than previous sessions. The second Tpersonal responsibility and not 45 days will be more telling. Here’s a depending on help from government. Unfortunately, many lawmakers refuse to rundown on some of Montana TU’s HB 525 – Sponsored by Rep. Mark apply this standard to the state’s hard-rock priorities as of March 3: Noland (R-Bigfork). Creates a permanent trust fund for combatting aquatic mining industry. Bills we support invasive species. Passed House, now in Sen. Mary Sheehy Moe (D-Great Falls) the Senate. introduced SB 218, a modest measure HB 140 – Sponsored by Rep. Jeff Wellborn requiring some hard-rock mines – those (R-Dillon). This bill increases resident Bills we oppose with potential to generate highly damaging hunting and fishing fees modestly ($3 HB 519 – Rep. Carl Glimm (R-Kila). acid-mine drainage – to post performance for fishing) while shifting FWP income This torturous, hard-to-understand bonds representing 100 percent of the planning to a 4-year cycle instead of 10 measure, developed by the state’s estimated cost of reclamation plus 50 years. Montana TU supports this so that homebuilders association, does not percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchapter C—Broadcast Radio Services
    SUBCHAPTER CÐBROADCAST RADIO SERVICES PARTS 70±72 [RESERVED] 73.151 Field strength measurements to es- tablish performance of directional anten- nas. PART 73ÐRADIO BROADCAST 73.152 Modification of directional antenna SERVICES data. 73.153 Field strength measurements in sup- Subpart AÐAM Broadcast Stations port of applications or evidence at hear- ings. Sec. 73.154 AM directional antenna partial proof 73.1 Scope. of performance measurements. 73.14 AM broadcast definitions. 73.157 Antenna testing during daytime. 73.158 Directional antenna monitoring 73.21 Classes of AM broadcast channels and points. stations. 73.160 Vertical plane radiation characteris- 73.23 AM broadcast station applications af- tics, f(θ). fected by international agreements. 73.182 Engineering standards of allocation. 73.24 Broadcast facilities; showing required. 73.183 Groundwave signals. 73.25 Clear channels; Class A, Class B and 73.184 Groundwave field strength graphs. Class D stations. 73.185 Computation of interfering signal. 73.26 Regional channels; Class B and Class D 73.186 Establishment of effective field at stations. one kilometer. 73.27 Local channels; Class C stations. 73.187 Limitation on daytime radiation. 73.28 Assignment of stations to channels. 73.189 Minimum antenna heights or field 73.29 Class C stations on regional channels. strength requirements. 73.30 Petition for authorization of an allot- 73.190 Engineering charts and related for- ment in the 1605±1705 kHz band. mulas. 73.31 Rounding of nominal power specified on applications. Subpart BÐFM Broadcast Stations 73.33 Antenna systems; showing required. 73.35 Calculation of improvement factors. 73.201 Numerical designation of FM broad- 73.37 Applications for broadcast facilities, cast channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
    Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center South Carolina Department of Natural Resources http://www.dnr.sc.gov/marine/sertc/ Southeastern Regional Taxonomic Center Invertebrate Literature Library (updated 9 May 2012, 4056 entries) (1958-1959). Proceedings of the salt marsh conference held at the Marine Institute of the University of Georgia, Apollo Island, Georgia March 25-28, 1958. Salt Marsh Conference, The Marine Institute, University of Georgia, Sapelo Island, Georgia, Marine Institute of the University of Georgia. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Caprellidea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1975). Phylum Arthropoda: Crustacea, Amphipoda: Gammaridea. Light's Manual: Intertidal Invertebrates of the Central California Coast. R. I. Smith and J. T. Carlton, University of California Press. (1981). Stomatopods. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 34,47 (in part).Canada Funds-in Trust. Ottawa, Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, by arrangement with the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vols. 1-7. W. Fischer, G. Bianchi and W. B. Scott. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume II. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Volume III. Final report to the Minerals Management Service. J. M. Uebelacker and P. G. Johnson. Mobile, AL, Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc. (1984). Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]