Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering the Pharmaceutical Industry Has Embraced the Genetic Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering the Pharmaceutical Industry Has Embraced the Genetic Revolution Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering The pharmaceutical industry has embraced the genetic revolution. CELIA HENRY onsidering just how long people have been perspective, here was using organisms to generate products for a method that could Cthem—think thousands of years of beer “tinker with” or and wine—the biotechnology industry is remark- “improve” life. In ably young. The industry as we know it today is response to scien- not even 30 years old. Yet, even in that short time, tists’ call for a moratorium on it has managed to have a major impact. recombinant DNA research, the National In the broadest sense, biotechnology is defined Institutes of Health (NIH) formed a recombinant as the use of any technology to manipulate living DNA advisory committee to oversee research in systems. However, what we call the biotechnology the field. In February 1975, prominent molecular industry is most readily associated with drugs that biologists, along with a few lawyers, physicians, are produced by bacteria that have and journalists, met at the Asilo- been genetically modified to mar Conference Center in Pacif- produce a protein they would not ic Grove, CA, to discuss the have otherwise produced, one issues surrounding such DNA that would normally be produced research. The recommendations by an entirely different organism. from the meeting were devel- Before the advent of biotech- oped into NIH guidelines that nology, obtaining adequate quan- were approved in 1976. tities of such molecules was an arduous exercise in protein isola- The Big Boys tion and purification. With the In 1976, venture capitalist invention of genetic engineering, Robert Swanson approached scientists could harness bacteria Boyer about the possibility of to crank out quantities of proteins starting a company based on that made them feasible as drugs. recombinant DNA technology. Top: Biotechnology research, Artville On April 7 of that year, Genen- Center: Herbert Boyer, founder of Founding Technology tech—the first biotechnology company—and the Genentech, National Library of The most important technology for the biotech- modern biotech industry were born. Medicine nology industry got its start when Stanley Cohen, California was the perfect place for the nascent a biologist at Stanford University, and Herb Boyer, biotech industry because it already had a venture a biochemist at the University of California, San capital community in place from the Francisco, discussed a research collaboration over computer industry. However, money from late-night deli sandwiches in Hawaii while attend- Kleiner Perkins, the venture capital firm ing a conference. They would take advantage of that Swanson worked for, only trickled into their complementary expertise in plasmid biology Genentech until the company could demon- and restriction enzymes to insert new genes into strate that human proteins could be bacteria. Those new genes didn’t have to be from produced this way. bacteria. Instead, they could be from higher organ- Swanson served as the CEO of Genentech isms, and the bacteria would produce proteins from 1976 to 1990. In 1990, he was named chair- normally made by other organisms. They started man of the board, a position he held until 1996. their experiments soon after returning from the Following his retirement from Genentech, he conference, and by March 1973, they knew that founded K&E Management, an investment their method worked, giving researchers the ability management firm that provided funding to start-up to isolate and amplify genes of their choosing. biotech companies such as Cytokinetics and AGY Recombinant DNA, as it was called, met with Therapeutics. initial controversy as people, scientists included, Within three years of Genentech’s founding, grappled with its implications. Depending on the company scientists had produced three human ENTERPRISE OF THE CHEMICAL SCIENCES 67 proteins in bacteria in rapid succession. The first company, went public in 1983. Its first true block- protein to be cloned was somatostatin in 1977. buster drug was Epogen, a genetically engineered Human insulin followed in 1978, and human version of erythropoietin, a protein that stimulates growth hormone in 1979. the formation of red blood cells. Epogen remains Although the company still had no products, one of the most successful biotechnology drugs, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND Genentech went public in 1980. It launched its with more than $2.4 billion in sales in 2003. GENETIC ENGINEERING initial public offering (IPO) on October 14. Shares Plenty of DNA research was going on outside were offered at $35 each. Within the first hour, the of California as well. Biogen was founded in 1978 stock price had jumped to $89, and it ended that by a group of biologists—many from the Boston first day at $71.25, marking one of the most suc- area—who gathered in Geneva. Future Nobel cessful public offerings on record. Prize winners Phillip Sharp of the Massachusetts Genentech’s successful IPO demonstrated that Institute of Technology, who won for RNA alter- biotech companies could raise capital before getting native splicing, and Walter Gilbert of Harvard anywhere near the clinic. A wave of new biotech University, who won for DNA sequencing, were companies was created in the wake of Genentech. among the founders of Biogen. The company is One of those companies was Amgen, which located in Cambridge, MA. originally stood for Applied Molecular Genetics, in Genzyme, another Boston area company, was Thousand Oaks, CA. founded in June 1981 by Henry Blair and Sherry Amgen was founded in Snyder. Genzyme has managed to thrive as a TAKING A DIFFERENT TAQ 1980 and began operations broadly diversified biotech company with divisions Kary B. Mullis, a scientist at Cetus Corporation in early 1981 with initial working in diagnostics, therapeutics, surgical prod- in Emeryville, CA, came up with the idea for the funding of approximately ucts, and tissue repair, among other areas. polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the spring $19 million. Members of of 1983 while driving. He suggested using a pair the company’s original The Other Biotech of primers to bracket the desired sequence and Scientific Advisory Board While work with protein drugs was going on, a copying it using DNA polymerase. He quickly real- (SAB) included Leroy C. parallel branch of the biotech industry was devel- ized that such an approach would allow him to Hood, then at the Califor- oping—monoclonal antibodies. Antibodies are double the number of copies of the DNA and that nia Institute of Technolo- proteins made by the immune system in response cycling through the reaction several times would gy. Other SAB members to foreign agents. result in an exponential amplification of the tar- were at the University of Antibodies have excellent recognition proper- get DNA. Mullis and his colleagues took close California, Santa Barbara, ties, but they are difficult to isolate in large quan- to two years to show that the concept actually and the University of Cali- tities. A breakthrough by César Milstein and worked. fornia, Los Angeles. Thou- Georges Köhler at the Medical Research Council Before PCR could become a viable commercial sand Oaks was picked as Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, technique, it was necessary to find a DNA poly- the location for the new U.K., in the early 1970s changed that. They found merase that could survive temperatures cycling company to be near its that by fusing an antibody-producing cell with a between 37 °C, where annealing and polymeriza- SAB members. The first myeloma cell (an immune system cancer cell) they tion occur, and 95 °C, where DNA denaturing CEO of Amgen was could get a cell that pumped out large quantities of occurs. The DNA polymerase known as Taq poly- George Rathmann, who a single antibody. Such cell fusions are often called merase from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus had been a vice president hybridomas. aquaticus, found in hot springs in Yellowstone for research and develop- The first company founded to commercialize National Park, was chosen. ment at Abbott Laborato- monoclonal antibodies was San Diego-based Hy- Because PCR was tangential to Cetus’s main ries. In 2002, Amgen ac- britech, started in 1978 by venture capitalist Brook focus on cancer therapeutics, the company looked quired the Seattle biotech Byers, Ivor Royston, a professor at the University to outside partnerships to commercialize the tech- company Immunex. of California, San Diego, and Howard Birndorf, a nique. Cetus signed an agreement with Kodak to The first biotech prod- researcher with Royston. The original idea was to develop in vitro diagnostic tests and entered into uct was marketed in 1982. produce monoclonal antibodies as research tools to a joint venture with Perkin-Elmer. Other compa- Genentech’s human replace polyclonal antibodies (mixtures of antibod- nies approached Cetus about the possibility of insulin, called Humulin, ies that target the same antigen), but the compa- licensing agreements. One of the companies that was licensed to Eli Lilly ny’s scope quickly expanded into diagnostic tools Cetus negotiated with was Hoffmann-La Roche, and Company, and it re- and potential therapeutics. It launched its IPO in which had exclusive rights to the basic patent for mains a major product 1981, raising $12 million followed by a $33 million interleukin-2, which Cetus was developing as an today, with sales of more second round in 1982. The company’s first product anticancer drug. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche) than $1 billion in 2003. was a test kit for immunoglobulin E. Hybritech was funded diagnostic research at Cetus to the tune Genentech brought its purchased by Eli Lilly in 1985. of $6 million per year for five years. In 1991, own product to market in Hybritech was just the first in a line of compa- Roche bought the rights to PCR. Perkin-Elmer 1985—human growth nies seeking to commercialize monoclonal anti- formed a strategic alliance with Roche to com- hormone, which was the bodies.
Recommended publications
  • Applied Biosystems 3730 and 3730Xl DNA Analyzers
    SPECIFICATION SHEET 3730 and 3730xl DNA Analyzers Applied Biosystems 3730 and 3730xl DNA Analyzers Introduction Applied Biosystems 3730 & 3730xl DNA Analyzers were developed to meet the growing needs of institutions ranging from core and research labs in academia, government, and medicine to biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and genome centers. These high-throughput instruments couple advances in automation and optics with proprietary Applied Biosystems reagents and software to support a diverse range Key Features Key Benefits of genetic analysis projects. By • Dual-side capillary illumination • Highest-quality DNA sequencing data dramatically improving data quality, at lowest cost • Backside-thinned CCD significantly reducing total cost per – POP-7™ Polymer separation matrix sample, and enabling more runs per • Integrated auto-sampler and sample increases read length and reduces day, 3730/3730xl DNA Analyzers make plate stacker run time it quicker and easier for investigators • Onboard piercing station to get meaningful results in evolving – Multiple run modules provide options genomic applications. Whether your • Internal barcode reader for targeted length of read lab is involved in de novo sequencing, • Onboard polymer for up to 100 runs – High optical sensitivity reduces DNA resequencing, microsatellite-based and reagent consumption fragment analysis, or SNP genotyping, • Automated basecalling and quality 3730/3730xl DNA Analyzers are the value assignment – In-capillary detection consumes ideal platform for better, faster, cheaper •
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting the Biotechnology Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area
    UC San Diego Reports and Studies Title Documenting the Biotechnology Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1m24k447 Author Chandler, Robin L. Publication Date 1997 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Documenting the Biotechnology Industry In the San Francisco Bay Area Robin L. Chandler Head, Archives and Special Collections UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management 1997 1 Table of Contents Project Goals……………………………………………………………………….p. 3 Participants Interviewed………………………………………………………….p. 4 I. Documenting Biotechnology in the San Francisco Bay Area……………..p. 5 The Emergence of An Industry Developments at the University of California since the mid-1970s Developments in Biotech Companies since mid-1970s Collaborations between Universities and Biotech Companies University Training Programs Preparing Students for Careers in the Biotechnology Industry II. Appraisal Guidelines for Records Generated by Scientists in the University and the Biotechnology Industry………………………. p. 33 Why Preserve the Records of Biotechnology? Research Records to Preserve Records Management at the University of California Records Keeping at Biotech Companies III. Collecting and Preserving Records in Biotechnology…………………….p. 48 Potential Users of Biotechnology Archives Approaches to Documenting the Field of Biotechnology Project Recommendations 2 Project Goals The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Library & Center for Knowledge Management and the Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) are collaborating in a year-long project beginning in December 1996 to document the impact of biotechnology in the Bay Area. The collaborative effort is focused upon the development of an archival collecting model for the field of biotechnology to acquire original papers, manuscripts and records from selected individuals, organizations and corporations as well as coordinating with the effort to capture oral history interviews with many biotechnology pioneers.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated DNA Sequencing
    Automated DNA Sequencing Chemistry Guide ©Copyright 1998, The Perkin-Elmer Corporation This product is for research purposes only. ABI PRISM, MicroAmp, and Perkin-Elmer are registered trademarks of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation. ABI, ABI PRISM, Applied Biosystems, BigDye, CATALYST, PE, PE Applied Biosystems, POP, POP-4, POP-6, and Primer Express are trademarks of The Perkin-Elmer Corporation. AmpliTaq, AmpliTaq Gold, and GeneAmp are registered trademarks of Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Centricon is a registered trademark of W. R. Grace and Co. Centri-Sep is a trademark of Princeton Separations, Inc. Long Ranger is a trademark of The FMC Corporation. Macintosh and Power Macintosh are registered trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. pGEM is a registered trademark of Promega Corporation. Contents 1 Introduction. 1-1 New DNA Sequencing Chemistry Guide . 1-1 Introduction to Automated DNA Sequencing . 1-2 ABI PRISM Sequencing Chemistries . 1-5 PE Applied Biosystems DNA Sequencing Instruments . 1-7 Data Collection and Analysis Settings . 1-12 2 ABI PRISM DNA Sequencing Chemistries . 2-1 Overview . 2-1 Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kits . 2-2 Dye Primer Cycle Sequencing Kits . 2-8 Dye Spectra . 2-12 Chemistry/Instrument/Filter Set Compatibilities . 2-13 Dye/Base Relationships for Sequencing Chemistries . 2-14 Choosing a Sequencing Chemistry. 2-15 3 Performing DNA Sequencing Reactions . 3-1 Overview . 3-1 DNA Template Preparation . 3-2 Sequencing PCR Templates . 3-10 DNA Template Quality. 3-15 DNA Template Quantity. 3-17 Primer Design and Quantitation . 3-18 Reagent and Equipment Considerations. 3-20 Preparing Cycle Sequencing Reactions . 3-21 Cycle Sequencing . 3-27 Preparing Extension Products for Electrophoresis .
    [Show full text]
  • Document Title: Development and Evaluation of a Whole Genome Amplification Method for Accurate Multiplex STR Genotyping of Compromised Forensic Casework Samples
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Development and Evaluation of a Whole Genome Amplification Method for Accurate Multiplex STR Genotyping of Compromised Forensic Casework Samples Author: Tracey Dawson Cruz, Ph.D. Document No.: 227501 Date Received: July 2009 Award Number: 2005-DA-BX-K002 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Development and Evaluation of a Whole Genome Amplification Method for Accurate Multiplex STR Genotyping of Compromised Forensic Casework Samples NIJ Award #: 2005-DA-BX-K002 Author: Tracey Dawson Cruz 1 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • List of SARS-Cov-2 Diagnostic Test Kits and Equipments Eligible For
    Version 33 2021-09-24 List of SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic test kits and equipments eligible for procurement according to Board Decision on Additional Support for Country Responses to COVID-19 (GF/B42/EDP11) The following emergency procedures established by WHO and the Regulatory Authorities of the Founding Members of the GHTF have been identified by the QA Team and will be used to determine eligibility for procurement of COVID-19 diagnostics. The product, to be considered as eligible for procurement with GF resources, shall be listed in one of the below mentioned lists: - WHO Prequalification decisions made as per the Emergency Use Listing (EUL) procedure opened to candidate in vitro diagnostics (IVDs) to detect SARS-CoV-2; - The United States Food and Drug Administration’s (USFDA) general recommendations and procedures applicable to the authorization of the emergency use of certain medical products under sections 564, 564A, and 564B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; - The decisions taken based on the Canada’s Minister of Health interim order (IO) to expedite the review of these medical devices, including test kits used to diagnose COVID-19; - The COVID-19 diagnostic tests approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for inclusion on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) on the basis of the Expedited TGA assessment - The COVID-19 diagnostic tests approved by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare after March 2020 with prior scientific review by the PMDA - The COVID-19 diagnostic tests listed on the French
    [Show full text]
  • History of Digital PCR Trisha Dhawan and Rémi Dangla 8/8/19
    History of Digital PCR Trisha Dhawan and Rémi Dangla 8/8/19 Outline 1.1. PCR, the start of a revolution .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Limit dilution PCR .......................................................................................................... 1 1.3. Digital PCR, a term coined by Vogestein and Kinzler ................................................... 2 2.1. PCR meets microfluidics ................................................................................................ 2 2.2. PCR in micro-droplets .................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Digital PCR in Microarrays ............................................................................................ 4 3.2. Digital PCR in Micro-droplets ........................................................................................ 4 Combining microarrays and microdropelts with Crystal™ digital PCR ............................ 5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 6 The origins of Digital PCR of template nucleic acid molecules, oligonucleotide primers, dNTPs, and a 1.1. PCR, the start of a revolution thermostable DNA polymerase. Over the years, The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was ongoing development and application of the PCR invented by Kary Mulis while he was developing reaction enabled molecular cloning, engineered methods for
    [Show full text]
  • Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory Taqpath SARS-Cov-2 Assay EUA Summary
    Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory TaqPath SARS-CoV-2 Assay EUA Summary ACCELERATED EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) SUMMARY SARS-CoV-2 ASSAY (Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory) For in vitro diagnostic use Rx only For use under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Only (The Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory TaqPath SARS-CoV-2 Assay will be performed in the Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory, a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), 42 U.S.C. §263a certified high-complexity laboratory, per the Instructions for Use that were reviewed by the FDA under this EUA). INTENDED USE The Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory TaqPath SARS-CoV-2 Assay is a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test intended for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in oropharyngeal (throat) swab, nasopharyngeal swab, anterior nasal swab, mid-turbinate nasal swab, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. This test is also for use with saliva specimens that are self-collected at home or in a healthcare setting by individuals using the Spectrum Solutions LLC SDNA-1000 Saliva Collection Device when determined to be appropriate by a healthcare provider. Testing is limited to Rutgers Clinical Genomics Laboratory (RCGL) at RUCDR Infinite Biologics – Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, that is a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), 42 U.S.C. §263a certified high-complexity laboratory. Results are for the detection and identification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The SARS- CoV-2 RNA is generally detectable in respiratory specimens during the acute phase of infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Program in Bioscience and Biotechnology Studies RONALD E. CAPE, M.B.A., Ph. D. BIOTECH PIONEER AND CO-FOUNDER OF CETUS Interviews Conducted by Sally Smith Hughes in 2003 Copyright © 2006 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by legal agreements between The Regents of the University of California and Ronald Cape, dated December 18, 2003. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting the Biotechnology Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area
    Documenting the Biotechnology Industry In the San Francisco Bay Area Robin L. Chandler Head, Archives and Special Collections UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management 1997 1 Table of Contents Project Goals……………………………………………………………………….p. 3 Participants Interviewed………………………………………………………….p. 4 I. Documenting Biotechnology in the San Francisco Bay Area……………..p. 5 The Emergence of An Industry Developments at the University of California since the mid-1970s Developments in Biotech Companies since mid-1970s Collaborations between Universities and Biotech Companies University Training Programs Preparing Students for Careers in the Biotechnology Industry II. Appraisal Guidelines for Records Generated by Scientists in the University and the Biotechnology Industry………………………. p. 33 Why Preserve the Records of Biotechnology? Research Records to Preserve Records Management at the University of California Records Keeping at Biotech Companies III. Collecting and Preserving Records in Biotechnology…………………….p. 48 Potential Users of Biotechnology Archives Approaches to Documenting the Field of Biotechnology Project Recommendations 2 Project Goals The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Library & Center for Knowledge Management and the Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) are collaborating in a year-long project beginning in December 1996 to document the impact of biotechnology in the Bay Area. The collaborative effort is focused upon the development of an archival collecting model for the field of biotechnology to acquire original papers, manuscripts and records from selected individuals, organizations and corporations as well as coordinating with the effort to capture oral history interviews with many biotechnology pioneers. This project combines the strengths of the existing UCSF Biotechnology Archives and the UCB Program in the History of the Biological Sciences and Biotechnology and will contribute to an overall picture of the growth and impact of biotechnology in the Bay Area.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Eppendorf Micro Centrifuge
    The new Eppendorf Micro Centrifuge. • With 50% higher::capacity,: variable speed,. quieter operation, and .......... Brand ...: .......... Higher capacity..,plus. Safe and ru ggecJ. The new..1.8-place. Model 5415 The" Eppe~dorf 5415 Micro Micro Centrifuge g wes you Centrifuge is UL listed for ~.i.mportant operating advantages-- • . safety: It's sorugged th.atan with unique Eppendorf quality: : acci.den~tatlyiunbalanced 4oad ......... Enclosed rotor design reduces air.turbulence won't cause excessive vibration Versatile in use, and noise. Tubes are angled precisely at 45°.to 0rm0tof~ damage. M.odel.5415 has a variable-speed maximize pellet formation. For more information:: call " ' ~ : " motor that reaches a maximum 800~645-3050;. in NewYork., . of.14,000 rpm with anlRCF of 5164334.~7500.,:. Or write . 16,000 x g;. a 30-minute:timer; Brinkmann..Ins.truments, Inc., • and a momentary button for short Cantiague Road,. Westbury, spins. It accepts 1.5 mL,.500 t~L, NY 11590. (In Canada ................... 400 I~L, and 250 #L Eppendorf 416-~675W911; 50 Galaxy Blvd., •Microcentrifuge Tubes and Rexdale., Ont. M9W 4Y5) blood Collection microtubes, such as B-D Microtainer*Tubes. Specifications ......... Maximumspeed: l4,000i;pm " New rotor design. Maximum RCF ...... : 16.000 x g The enclosedrotor design Test-tube capacity ':: 1:.8 ...... reduces air turbulencefor Timerequired for " - " maximum speed i....10.sec. quieter operation:. And the new Timerequired to stop I~2 sec ........ - Quick, release feature; aitowsthe18-position :.Dimensions quick,reie.ase featu re lets.you rotor to be easily transported even.when ....... (L X W x H): 28 X 2! x 28.5 cm transport the: rotor with tubes--- Loaded .....
    [Show full text]
  • ESPACE Economies in Space - Working Papers in Economic Geography
    ESPACE Economies in Space - Working Papers in Economic Geography No. 2008-5 The spatial innovation biography of a commercially successful monoclonal antibody Christian Zeller 20 January 2008 Universität Bern, Institute of Geography, Economic Geography and Regional Studies http://www.geography.unibe.ch/econgeo The spatial innovation biography of a successful monoclonal antibody Christian Zeller Geographisches Institut der Universität Bern Hallerstr. 12 CH-3012 Bern Phone +-31-631 8556 Fax. +41-31-631 85 11 [email protected] Abstract. The paper presents an in-depth analysis of the innovation biography and geography of a commercially successful monoclonal antibody and related technologies. At present, out of about 100 recombinant therapeutics on the market, 21 are monoclonal antibodies. The analysis is based on a conceptual framework that combines elements from sectoral innovation systems and technological systems approaches as well as debates on different knowledge bases. This detailed analysis of one therapeutic agent reveals the participants in the entire innovation process and their locations. Pharmacetical drugs follow a very complex innovation path, from basic research on disease mechanisms, to discovery of the drug candidate, to preclinical and clinical development, manufacturing and approval for market. The paper shows the structure of resource, knowledge and value flows over the course of the entire innovation process, from basic discovery up to the commercialization of the drug. The more the innovation process progresses, the more it is shaped by financial and commercial considerations. Keywords: monoclonal antibodies, biotechnology, innovation systems, knowledge, intellectual property Espace 2008-5 Spatial innovation biography of a successful monoclonal antibody 1. Introduction Much geographical research undertaken on innovation processes in biotechnology suffers from three shortcomings.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Fragment Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis User Guide
    USER GUIDE DNA Fragment Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis Publication Number 4474504 Revision B For Research Use Only. Not intended for use in diagnostic procedures. For Research Use Only. Not intended for use in diagnostic procedures. The information in this guide is subject to change without notice. DISCLAIMER LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION AND/OR ITS AFFILIATE(S) DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THIS DOCUMENT, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. TO THE EXTENT ALLOWED BY LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL LIFE TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR ITS AFFILIATE(S) BE LIABLE, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, WARRANTY, OR UNDER ANY STATUTE OR ON ANY OTHER BASIS FOR SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, MULTIPLE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES IN CONNECTION WITH OR ARISING FROM THIS DOCUMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE USE THEREOF. TRADEMARKS All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. AmpErase, AmpliTaq, AmpliTaq Gold, and TaqMan are registered trademarks of Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. AFLP is a registered trademark of Keygene N.V. Millipore is a registered trademark of Merck KGaA. © 2014 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. Contents About This Guide . 13 Revision history . 13 Purpose . 13 Prerequisites . 13 Structure of this guide . 14 ■ CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Fragment Analysis . 15 Fragment analysis versus sequencing…what is the difference? . 15 Fragment analysis . 15 Sequencing . 16 What can I do with fragment analysis? . 16 Types of applications . 16 Applications described in this guide . 17 What is capillary electrophoresis? . 18 Fragment analysis workflow . 19 ■ CHAPTER 2 Experimental Design .
    [Show full text]