Legal Guide for Lgbt Parents & Future Parents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law Volume 20 | Issue 2 Article 12 3-1-2006 Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl Part of the Family Law Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert Wintemute, Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah?, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 527 (2006). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/jpl/vol20/iss2/12 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah? Robert Wintemute∗ Attempts to amend constitutions so as to make legal1 marriage impossible for same-sex couples are futile. Amendments of this kind are nothing more than temporary “legal dikes” designed to create “legal islands” in which a heterosexual majority can continue to discriminate against a lesbian and gay minority in relation to access to legal marriage. These amendments seek to strip the gay and lesbian minority of any possibility of seeking protection against such discrimination from either the legislature or the courts. Where such amendments have been adopted, they will eventually be repealed or invalidated, because the “incoming tide,” i.e., the long-term international trend, will eventually bring full legal equality to our fellow human beings who happen to be lesbian and gay individuals, or members of same-sex couples, with or without children. -
The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights
83 The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights Jens M. Scherpe1 I. Introduction – It’s Been a Long Road... The legal regulation of family relationships same-sex couples in an increasing number has long been formulated around a “tradi- of jurisdictions, and in others, a form of reg- tional” notion of the family as a unit com- istered partnership is available or de facto prising a heterosexual married couple who relationships of same-sex couples are rec- conceive children within wedlock. This has ognised. But even in Europe, particularly in resulted in the protection mechanisms of the Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, there law focusing on such family units, with other are still many jurisdictions where there is no family forms such as, for example, same-sex legal recognition of same-sex relationships. couples, unmarried couples, couples who are However, in Schalk and Kopf v Austria2 the unable to conceive naturally and single par- European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ents failing to have their family relationships recognised that same-sex couples enjoy the adequately recognised and protected in law. right to “respect for family life” protected This often included, at least initially, not rec- by Article 8 of the ECHR, and this article ar- ognising “non-traditional” families’ rights to gues that this mandates some form of legal respect for their family life under Article 8 of recognition of same-sex relationships by all the Convention for the Protection of Human contracting states of the ECHR and paves Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). -
Phd Thesis Entitled “A White Wedding? the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada”, Under the Supervision of Dr
A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada by Suzanne Judith Lenon A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto © Copyright by Suzanne Judith Lenon (2008) A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Suzanne Judith Lenon Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education University of Toronto Abstract In A White Wedding? The Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage, I examine the inter-locking relations of power that constitute the lesbian/gay subject recognized by the Canadian nation-state as deserving of access to civil marriage. Through analysis of legal documents, Parliamentary and Senate debates, and interviews with lawyers, I argue that this lesbian/gay subject achieves intelligibility in the law by trading in on and shoring up the terms of racialized neo-liberal citizenship. I also argue that the victory of same-sex marriage is implicated in reproducing and securing a racialized Canadian national identity as well as a racialized civilizational logic, where “gay rights” are the newest manifestation of the modernity of the “West” in a post-9/11 historical context. By centring a critical race/queer conceptual framework, this research project follows the discursive practices of respectability, freedom and civility that circulate both widely and deeply in this legal struggle. I contend that in order to successfully shed its historical markers of degeneracy, the lesbian/gay subject must be constituted not as a sexed citizen but rather as a neoliberal citizen, one who is intimately tied to notions of privacy, property, autonomy and freedom of choice, and hence one who is racialized as white. -
Supreme Court of Canada (On Appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario)
SCC File No. 37209 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO) BETWEEN: TRINITY WESTERN UNIVERSITY and BRAYDEN VOLKENANT Appellants -and- THE LAW SOCIETY OF UPPER CANADA Respondent -and- ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Intervener -and- START PROUD and OUTLAWS Proposed Intervener MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENER, START PROUD and OUTLAWS (Rules 47 and 55 of the Rules ofthe Supreme Court of Canada) GOLDBLATTPARTNERSLLP GOLDBLATTPARTNERSLLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 30 Metcalfe Street, Suite 500 Toronto, ON M5G 2C2 Ottawa, ON K1P 5L4 Marlys Edwardh Colleen Bauman Vanessa Payne Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-979-4380 Tel: 613-482-2463 Fax: 416-979-4430 Fax: 613-235-3041 2 PAUL JONATHAN SAGUIL 66 Wellington St. West TD Tower, P.O. Box 1 Toronto ON MSK 1A2 Paul Jonathan Saguil Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-308-1719 MARTIN+ ASSOCIATES 863 Hamilton Street Vancouver, BC V6B 2R7 Frances Mahon Email: [email protected] Tel: 604-682-4200 Agent for the Proposed Intervener, Counsel for the Proposed Intervener, Start Proud and OUTlaws Start Proud and OUTlaws ORIGINAL TO: The Registrar Supreme Court of Canada 301 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON KIA OJl 3 COPIES TO: BENNETT JONES LLP BENNETT JONES LLP 3400 One First Canadian Place World Exchange Plaza P.O. Box 130 I900- 45 O'Connor Street Toronto, ON M5X IA4 Ottawa, ON KIP IA4 Robert W. Stanley Mark Jewett QC Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Ranjan Aganval Tel: 6I3-683-2328 Email: [email protected] Fax: 6I3-683-2323 Tel: 4I6-863-I200 Fax: 4I6-863-I2I6 KUHNLLP IOO- 32I60 S Fraser Way Abbotsford, BC V2T I W5 Kevin L. -
National Police Check 100 Point Checklist
AFP NPC FORM-8022 NATIONAL POLICE CHECK (NPC) 100 POINT CHECKLIST FOR IDENTIFICATION DOCUMENTS A minimum of 100 points of identification has to be provided with an application. Use this as a checklist when preparing your identification documents. Identification Documents - 100 Point Checklist Required on document Tick if You must supply at least ONE Primary document Points Points gained Foreign documents must be accompanied by an official translation N = Name, P = photo Worth included A = Address, S = Signature Foreign Passport (current) Australian Passport (current or expired within last 2 years but not cancelled) Australian Citizenship Certificate Full Birth certificate (not birth certificate extract) Certificate of Identity issued by the Australian Government to refugees and non Australian citizens for entry to Australia Australian Driver Licence/Learner’s Permit Current (Australian) Tertiary Student Identification Card Photo identification card issued for Australian regulatory purposes (e.g. Aviation/Maritime Security identification, security industry etc.) Government employee ID (Australian Federal/State/Territory) Defence Force Identity Card (with photo or signature) Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) card Centrelink card (with reference number) Birth Certificate Extract Birth card (NSW Births, Deaths, Marriages issue only) Medicare card Credit card or account card Australian Marriage certificate (Australian Registry issue only) Decree Nisi / Decree Absolute (Australian Registry issue only) Change of name certificate (Australian Registry issue only) Bank statement (showing transactions) Property lease agreement - current address Taxation assessment notice Australian Mortgage Documents - Current address Rating Authority - Current address eg Land Rates Utility Bill - electricity, gas, telephone - Current address (less than 12 months old) Reference from Indigenous Organisation Documents issued outside Australia (equivalent to Australian documents). -
1538I (Design Date 11/20) – Page 1
Proof of Identity Requirements Customs Licensing Application At least four identity documents must be supplied, as specified below. Identity documents supplied do not need to be certified. The identity documents supplied must be issued in the name of the person making the application. Where any of the identity documents supplied are in a former name, evidence must be submitted of an Australian Register of Births, Deaths and Marriages issued change of name certificate or an Australian marriage certificate issued by a State or Territory. The combination of identity documents supplied must be in colour and include the applicants full name, date of birth, current address and a photograph. If an identity document containing a photograph cannot be provided you must submit a passport style photograph that has been certified by a person listed in Schedule 2 of the Statutory Declarations Regulations 1993 (Cth) that the photograph is a photograph of the applicant. Foreign Citizens who are unable to provide the requested identity documents please contact the Customs Licensing team to discuss what documents you must provide to prove your identity. At least ONE commencement document must be supplied At least TWO secondary documents must be supplied (Category A) (Category C) At least ONE of the following commencement documents At least TWO of the following secondary documents must must be supplied be supplied and they must not be expired • An Australian Passport, not more than 2 years expired • Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) issued IF you do not have an Australian passport ONE of the Certificate of Identity following documents must be supplied • DFAT issued Document of Identity • A full Australian Birth Certificate (not an extract or birth card) • DFAT issued United Nations Convention Travel Document • Australian Visa current at time of entry to Australia as a Secondary resident or tourist • Foreign government issued documents (eg. -
Change Name on Birth Certificate Quebec
Change Name On Birth Certificate Quebec Salim still kraal stolidly while vesicular Bradford tying that druggists. Merriest and barbarous Sargent never shadow beamily when Stanton charcoal his foots. Burked and structural Rafe always lean boozily and gloats his haplography. Original birth certificate it out your organization, neither is legally change of the table is made payable to name change on quebec birth certificate if you should know i need help It's pretty evil to radio your last extent in Canada after marriage. Champlain regional college lennoxville admissions. Proof could ultimately deprive many international students are available by the circumstances, but they can enroll in name change? Canadian Florida Department and Highway Safety and Motor. Hey Quebec it's 2017 let me choose my name CBC Radio. Segment snippet included. 1 2019 the axe first days of absence as a result of ten birth or adoption. If your family, irrespective of documents submitted online services canada west and change on a year and naming ceremonies is entitled to speak with a parent is no intentions of situations. Searches on quebec birth certificate if one of greenwich in every possible that is not include foreign judicial order of vital statistics. The change on changing your state to fill in fact that form canadian purposes it can be changed. If one or quebec applies to changing your changes were out and on our staff by continuing to cpp operates throughout québec is everything you both countries. Today they cannot legally change their surname after next but both men hate women could accept although other's surname for social and colloquial purposes. -
Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage
Emory Law Journal Volume 64 Issue 6 Paper Symposium — Polygamous Unions? Charting the Contours of Marriage Law's Frontier 2015 The Evolution of Plural Parentage: Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage Stu Marvel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Stu Marvel, The Evolution of Plural Parentage: Applying Vulnerability Theory to Polygamy and Same-Sex Marriage, 64 Emory L. J. 2047 (2015). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol64/iss6/9 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARVEL GALLEYSPROOFS2 5/27/2015 2:14 PM THE EVOLUTION OF PLURAL PARENTAGE: APPLYING VULNERABILITY THEORY TO POLYGAMY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE Stu Marvel∗ ABSTRACT Much of the legal debate surrounding the challenge to “traditional” heterosexual marriage has involved questions of liberty, discrimination, and equal treatment. Similar moves have now been made by advocates for polygamous marriage, indicating that polygamous families may be on track to follow in the rainbow contrails of same-sex marriage. This Article argues that such an evolution is indeed likely, but for different reasons than commonly held. Instead, it applies the emerging paradigm of vulnerability theory to a recent suite of polygamy and same-sex marriage rulings, with particular focus on the figure of the “vulnerable” child. At the same time, this Article will also consider the legal and social consequences of the mechanics of reproduction within both same-sex and polygamous families. -
Private Law As Constitutional Context for Same-Sex Marriage
Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-sex Marriage Private Law as Constitutional Context for Same-sex Marriage ROBERT LECKEY * While scholars of gay and lesbian activism have long eyed developments in Canada, the leading Canadian judgment on same-sex marriage has recently been catapulted into the field of vision of comparative constitutionalists indifferent to gay rights and matrimonial matters more generally. In his irate dissent in the case striking down a state sodomy law as unconstitutional, Scalia J of the United States Supreme Court mentions Halpern v Canada (Attorney General).1 Admittedly, he casts it in an unfavourable light, presenting it as a caution against the recklessness of taking constitutional protection of homosexuals too far.2 Still, one senses from at least the American literature that there can be no higher honour for a provincial judgment from Canada — if only in the jurisdictional sense — than such lofty acknowledgement that it exists. It seems fair, then, to scrutinise academic responses to the case for broader insights. And it will instantly be recognised that the Canadian judgment emerged against a backdrop of rapid change in the legislative and judicial treatment of same-sex couples in most Western jurisdictions. Following such scrutiny, this paper detects a lesson for comparative constitutional law in the scholarly treatment of the recognition of same-sex marriage in Canada. Its case study reveals a worrisome inclination to regard constitutional law, especially the judicial interpretation of entrenched rights, as an enterprise autonomous from a jurisdiction’s private law. Due respect accorded to calls for comparative constitutionalism to become interdisciplinary, comparatists would do well to attend,intra disciplinarily, to private law’s effects upon constitutional interpretation. -
Application for Certified Copy of Kansas Birth Certificate * PLEASE NOTE BIRTH CERTIFICATES ARE on FILE from JULY 1, 1911 to PRESENT
Application for Certified Copy of Kansas Birth Certificate * PLEASE NOTE BIRTH CERTIFICATES ARE ON FILE FROM JULY 1, 1911 TO PRESENT Name of Requestor: Today's Date: (person requesting the certificate) Address: City/State: Zip: Reason for Request (PLEASE BE SPECIFIC): Email: Signature of Requestor: Phone Number: *IMPORTANT: The person requesting the vital record must submit a copy of their identification. See list on reverse side. Relationship to person on the Certificate? (Check one) Self Father Maternal Grandparent Paternal Uncle Mother Brother Paternal Grandparent Maternal Uncle Sister Son Legal Guardian(submit custody order) Paternal Aunt Current Spouse Daughter Other (specify) Maternal Aunt Fees K.A.R. 28-17-6 requires the following fee(s). The correct fee must be submitted with the request. The fee for certified copies of birth certificates is $15.00 for each certified copy. This fee allows a 5-year search of the records, including the year indicated plus two years before and two years after, or you may indicate the consecutive 5-year period you want searched. You may specify more than one 5-year span, but each search will cost $15.00. * IF THE CERTIFICATE IS NOT LOCATED, A $15.00 FEE MUST BE RETAINED BY THIS DEPARTMENT FOR THE RECORD SEARCH. Make checks or money orders payable to Kansas Vital Statistics. For your protection, do not send cash. Birth Information Name on birth Certificate: Date of Birth: Place of Birth: Race: Sex: City, County, State ( must be in Kansas ) Hospital of Birth: Date of Death: Current Age of this person: (If Applicable) Full Maiden name of Mother: Birthplace of Mother: Full Name of Father/Parent: Birthplace of Father/Parent: Number of copies ordered: $15 per certified copy $Total: Adoption Information Name Change Adopted? Yes No Is request for record before adoption? If certificate name has changed since birth other than adoption Yes No or marriage, please list changed name here: Provide before adoption name (below) *Requirements-Read before turning in application OFFICE USE ONLY 1) This request form must be completed. -
Family, Unvalued Discrimination, Denial, and the Fate of Binational Same-Sex Couples Under U.S
Family, Unvalued Discrimination, Denial, and the Fate of Binational Same-Sex Couples under U.S. Law Copyright © 2006 Human Rights Watch/Immigration Equality All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-336-6 Cover photos: © 2006 Private Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Immigration Equality 350 West 31st Street, Suite 505 New York, NY 10001 Tel. +1 (212) 714-2904 Fax +1 (212) 714-2973 E-mail: [email protected] www.immigrationequality.org Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: 1-(212) 290-4700, Fax: 1-(212) 736-1300 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel:1-(202) 612-4321, Fax:1-(202) 612-4333 [email protected] 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road London N1 9HF, UK Tel: 44 20 7713 1995, Fax: 44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] Rue Van Campenhout 15, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Tel: 32 (2) 732-2009, Fax: 32 (2) 732-0471 [email protected] 9 rue Cornavin 1201 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 04 81, Fax: +41 22 738 17 91 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel. +49 30 259 306 10, Fax. +49 30 259 306 29 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch is dedicated to protecting the human rights of people around the world. We stand with victims and activists to prevent discrimination, to uphold political freedom, to protect people from inhumane conduct in wartime, and to bring offenders to justice. -
Homosexuality and Prostitution: a Tale of Two Deviancies Ummni Khan
Homosexuality and prostitution: A tale of two deviancies Ummni Khan University of Toronto Law Journal, Volume 70, Number 3, Summer 2020, pp. 283-305 (Article) Published by University of Toronto Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/760438 [ Access provided at 31 Dec 2020 13:39 GMT from University of Ottawa ] Ummni Khan* HOMOSEXUALITY AND PROSTITUTION: A TALE OF TWO DEVIANCIES† Historically, homosexuality and prostitution were both branded immoral vices that required crim- inalization, despite the fact that they were also considered ‘victimless crimes.’ Yet, in contemporary Canadian society, gays and lesbians have gained wide social acceptance and legal rights, while the sex trade has become more criminalized, stigmatized, and, for clients or third parties, vilified. This article explores the reasons for this divergence. First, drawing on radical queer critique, I problematize this framing, arguing that the equality and rights-based victories for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and trans community did not necessarily benefit all of its members. Building on this insight, I argue that those queers who are unable or uninterested in accessing the benefits ushered in by ‘gay rights’ have identities, proclivities, and vulnerabilities that overlap with those of sex workers and/or their clients. Part I of the article sets the socio-legal and political context, providing succinct overviews of key developments relating to gay and lesbian rights and of key developments relating to sex trade regulation, focusing primarily on the last fifty years. Part II analyses how 10.3138/utlj.2019-0082 gay/lesbian mainstream acceptance and the queer/sex trade marginalization occurred through e20190082 overlapping discourses and laws related to privacy, bawdy houses/indecency, disease, spousal/ 70 marital relations, and children.