DOCSLIB.ORG

COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update As of August 30, 2021 COVID-19 Travel Restrictions Installation Status Update Criteria for Lifting Travel Restrictions Step 1: Meet Installation Criteria (No Travel Restrictions, HPCON below Charlie, Essential Services Available, Quality Assurance in place for Movers) Step 2: Director of Administration and Management (DA&M), the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander approve lifting travel restrictions for an installation Step 1 criteria must be met before travel restrictions can be lifted for an installation by the DA&M, the Secretary of a Military Department, or a Combatant Commander. If installation conditions are subsequently not met, the approval authority decides if travel restrictions should be reinstated. Unrestricted travel is allowed for Service members or civilians between installations that have met the criteria of the Secretary of Defense memorandum on the conditions- based approach to personnel movement and travel dated March 15, 2021. If either installation does not meet the criteria, an exemption or waiver would be required. Travel Restrictions LIFTED at 183 of 230 Installations (80%) (Met: Step 1 & Step 2) Of the 183 installations with lifted travel restrictions this week, 7 reinstated travel restrictions while 0 lifted restrictions. 1 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Army USA - MD Yes ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Army USA - AL Yes BAUMHOLDER H.D.SMITH BRCKS Army Germany Yes CAMP CASEY TONGDUCHON Army South Korea Yes CAMP DODGE Army USA - IA Yes CAMP HENRY Army South Korea Yes CAMP HUMPHREYS Army South Korea Yes CAMP ZAMA TOKYO Army Japan Yes CARLISLE BARRACKS Army USA - PA Yes DETROIT ARSENAL Army USA - MI Yes FORT BELVOIR Army USA - VA Yes FORT BENNING Army USA - GA Yes FORT BLISS Army USA - TX Yes FORT BRAGG Army USA - NC Yes FORT CAMPBELL Army USA - KY Yes FORT CARSON Army USA - CO Yes FORT CUSTER TRNG CTR Army USA - MI Yes FORT DETRICK Army USA - MD Yes FORT DRUM Army USA - NY Yes FORT GEORGE G. MEADE Army USA - MD Yes FORT GORDON Army USA - GA Yes FORT HAMILTON Army USA - NY Yes FORT HOOD Army USA - TX Yes FORT HUACHUCA Army USA - AZ Yes FORT IRWIN Army USA - CA Yes FORT JACKSON Army USA - SC Yes FORT KNOX Army USA - KY Yes FORT LEAVENWORTH Army USA - KS Yes FORT LEE Army USA - VA Yes FORT LEONARD WOOD Army USA - MO Yes FORT MCCOY Army USA - WI Yes FORT POLK Army USA - LA Yes FORT RILEY Army USA - KS Yes FORT RUCKER Army USA - AL Yes FORT SILL Army USA - OK Yes FORT STEWART Army USA - GA Yes FORT WILLIAM H. HARRISON Army USA - MT Yes GRAFENWOHR GERMANY Army Germany Yes 2 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted HOHENFELS GERMANY Army Germany Yes JOINT BASE LEWIS MCCHORD Army USA - WA Yes JOINT BASE MYER HENDERSON HALL Army USA - DC Yes KAISERSLAUTERN Army Germany Yes LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes LEXINGTON BLUE GRASS DEPOT Army USA - KY Yes LOS ALAMITOS AFRC Army USA - CA Yes MCALESTER ARMY AMMO PLANT Army USA - OK Yes PICATINNY ARSENAL Army USA - NJ Yes PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY Army USA - CA Yes RED RIVER DEPOT Army USA - TX Yes REDSTONE ARSENAL Army USA - AL Yes ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL Army USA - IL Yes SAN JUAN FORT BUCHANAN Army Puerto Rico Yes SCHOFIELD BARRACKS Army USA - HI Yes SIERRA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - CA Yes STUTTGART GERMANY Army Germany Yes TOBYHANNA ARMY DEPOT Army USA - PA Yes US ARMY GARRISON ALASKA Army USA - AK Yes US ARMY GARRISON HAWAII Army USA - HI Yes US ARMY GARRISON MIAMI Army USA - FL Yes USA NATICK RSCH & DEV CTR Army USA - MA Yes VICENZA ITALY Army Italy Yes VILSECK Army Germany Yes WATERVLIET ARSENAL Army USA - NY Yes WEST POINT MILRES Army USA - NY Yes WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE Army USA - NM Yes WIESBADEN GERMANY Army Germany Yes YONGSAN KOREA Army South Korea Yes YUMA PROVING GROUND Army USA - AZ Yes DFAS CLEVELAND CENTER DA&M USA - OH No DFAS COLUMBUS CENTER DA&M USA - OH Yes DFAS HEADQUARTERS DA&M USA - IN No PENTAGON BUILDING SITE DA&M USA - VA Yes ANNAPOLIS NS(INCL USNA) Navy USA - MD Yes CBC GULFPORT MS Navy USA - MS No CHINA LAKE NAVWEAPCEN Navy USA - CA Yes COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA Navy Japan No 3 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted CORONADO NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - CA Yes CORPUS CHRISTI NAS Navy USA - TX No CRANE NAVWEAPSUPPCEN Navy USA - IN No FALLON NAS Navy USA - NV Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES CHINHAE KS Navy South Korea Yes FLEET ACTIVITIES SASEBO Navy Japan No INDIAN HEAD NAV ORD STA Navy USA - MD Yes JACKSONVILLE NAS Navy USA - FL No JBPHH PEARL HARBOR HAWAII Navy USA - HI Yes KEY WEST NAS Navy USA - FL No KINGS BAY NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - GA No LEMOORE NAS Navy USA - CA Yes LITTLE CREEK NAV AMPHIB BASE Navy USA - VA No MAYPORT NAVSTA Navy USA - FL No MERIDIAN NAS Navy USA - MS No NAF ATSUGI JA Navy Japan No NAF MISAWA JA Navy Japan No NAS JRB FT WORTH TX Navy USA - TX No NAS KINGSVILLE TX Navy USA - TX No NAS SIGONELLA SICILY Navy Italy Yes NAVAL BASE KITSAP-BREMERTON Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION EVERETT Navy USA - WA Yes NAVAL STATION GREAT LAKES Navy USA - IL Yes NAVAL STATION GUAM Navy Guam No NAVAL STATION NEWPORT Navy USA - RI Yes NAVAL STATION ROTA SPAIN Navy Spain Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MID-SOU Navy USA - TN No NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY MONTEREY Navy USA - CA Yes CA NAVAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY WASH Navy USA - DC Yes NAVAL SUPPORT ACTY PANAMA CITY Navy USA - FL No NAVAL TRAINING CTR ORLANDO Navy USA - FL No NAVBASE POINT LOMA Navy USA - CA Yes NAVBASE SAN DIEGO CA Navy USA - CA Yes NAVBASE VENTURA CTY Navy USA - CA Yes NAVMAG INDIAN ISLAND Navy USA - WA Yes NAVSTA GUANTANAMO BAY Navy Cuba No NAVSUPPACT BETHESDA MD Navy USA - MD Yes NAVSUPPACT HAMPTON ROADS VA Navy USA - VA No 4 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted NAVSUPPACT MECHANICSBURG PA Navy USA - PA Yes NAVSUPPACT NAPLES IT Navy Italy Yes NAVSUPPFAC BEAUFORT SC Navy USA - SC No NEW LONDON NAVSUBBASE Navy USA - CT Yes NEW ORLEANS NAS JRB Navy USA - LA No NORFOLK NAV SHIPYD Navy USA - VA No NORFOLK NAVAL BASE Navy USA - VA No NSA ANDERSEN Navy Guam No NSA BAHRAIN Navy Bahrain Yes NSA SARATOGA SPRINGS NY Navy USA - NY Yes NSD YOKOSUKA JAPAN Navy Japan No NSY PORTSMOUTH Navy USA - NH Yes NWS EARLE NJ Navy USA - NJ Yes OCEANA NAS Navy USA - VA No PATUXENT RIVER NAS Navy USA - MD Yes PENSACOLA NAS Navy USA - FL No SEAL BEACH NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - CA Yes WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Navy USA - WA Yes WHITING FIELD NAS Navy USA - FL No YORKTOWN NAVWEAPSTA Navy USA - VA No ALTUS AFB USAF USA - OK Yes AVIANO AB USAF Italy Yes BARKSDALE AFB USAF USA - LA No BEALE AFB USAF USA - CA Yes BUCKLEY AFB USAF USA - CO Yes CANNON AFB USAF USA - NM Yes COLUMBUS AFB USAF USA - MS Yes DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB USAF USA - AZ Yes DOBBINS ARB USAF USA - GA No DOVER AFB USAF USA - DE Yes DYESS AFB USAF USA - TX Yes EDWARDS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes EGLIN AFB USAF USA - FL No EIELSON AFB USAF USA - AK Yes ELLSWORTH AFB USAF USA - SD Yes F E WARREN AFB USAF USA - WY Yes FAIRCHILD AFB USAF USA - WA Yes GOODFELLOW AFB USAF USA - TX Yes 5 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted GRAND FORKS AFB USAF USA - ND Yes GRISSOM AFB USAF USA - IN Yes HANSCOM AFB USAF USA - MA Yes HILL AFB USAF USA - UT Yes HOLLOMAN AFB USAF USA - NM Yes HOMESTEAD AFB USAF USA - FL No HURLBURT FIELD USAF USA - FL No INCIRLIK AB SITE 1 USAF Turkey Yes JB ANACOSTIA-BOLLING USAF USA - DC Yes JB ANDREWS USAF USA - MD Yes JB CHARLESTON USAF USA - SC Yes JB ELMENDORF RICHARDSON USAF USA - AK Yes JB LANGLEY-EUSTIS USAF USA - VA Yes JB MCGUIRE DIX LAKEHURST USAF USA - NJ Yes JB SAN ANTONIO USAF USA - TX Yes KADENA AB USAF Japan No KEESLER AFB USAF USA - MS Yes KIRTLAND AFB USAF USA - NM Yes KUNSAN AB USAF South Korea Yes LAUGHLIN AFB USAF USA - TX Yes LITTLE ROCK AFB USAF USA - AR No LOS ANGELES AFB USAF USA - CA Yes LUKE AFB USAF USA - AZ Yes MACDILL AFB USAF USA - FL No MALMSTROM AFB USAF USA - MT Yes MARCH AFB USAF USA - CA Yes MAXWELL AFB (INCL. GUNTER) USAF USA - AL Yes MCCONNELL AFB USAF USA - KS Yes MINN ST PAUL ARS USAF USA - MN Yes MINOT AFB USAF USA - ND Yes MISAWA AB USAF Japan No MOODY AFB USAF USA - GA No MOUNTAIN HOME AFB USAF USA - ID Yes NELLIS AFB USAF USA - NV Yes NIAGARA FALLS ARS USAF USA - NY Yes OFFUTT AFB USAF USA - NE Yes OSAN AIR BASE USAF South Korea Yes PATRICK AFB USAF USA - FL No 6 of 8 As of August 30, 2021 Travel Installation Service Country/State Restrictions Lifted PETERSON-SCHRIEVER GARRISON USAF USA - CO Yes PITTSBURGH ANG USAF USA - PA Yes PITTSBURGH ARS USAF USA - PA Yes RAF LAKENHEATH USAF United Kingdom Yes RAF MILDENHALL USAF United Kingdom Yes RAMSTEIN FRG USAF Germany Yes ROBINS AFB USAF USA - GA Yes SCOTT AFB USAF USA - IL Yes SEYMOUR JOHNSON AFB USAF USA - NC Yes SHAW AFB USAF USA - SC Yes SHEPPARD AFB USAF USA - TX Yes SPANGDAHLEM AB USAF Germany No TINKER AFB USAF USA - OK Yes TRAVIS AFB USAF USA - CA Yes TYNDALL AFB USAF USA - FL No USAF ACADEMY USAF USA - CO Yes VANCE AFB USAF USA - OK Yes VANDENBERG AFB USAF USA - CA Yes WESTOVER ARB AFB USAF USA - MA Yes WHITEMAN AFB USAF USA - MO Yes WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB USAF USA - OH Yes YOKOTA AB USAF Japan No YOUNGSTOWN JOINT AIR RESERVE USAF USA - OH Yes STATION CHERRY POINT MCAS USMC USA - NC Yes MAKIMINATO OKINAWA CP BUTLER USMC Japan Yes MARINE BARRACKS WASH D.C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kokoro Kara Heart Mountain Wyoming Foundation
    Fall 2016 KOKORO KARA HEART MOUNTAIN WYOMING FOUNDATION •”A Song of America:” 2016 Heart Mountain Pilgrimage •Exhibit Preview: Ansel Adams Meets Yoshio Okumoto The Walk Family: Generous Heart Mountain Champions All cover photographs from HMWF Okumoto Collection • Compassionate Witnesses: Chair Shirley Ann Higuchi “It was a miserably cold day and the documented the Heart Mountain journey, HMWF a Leadership in History Award people looked terribly cold. They got on and our longtime supporter Margot Walk, from the American Association for State the train and went away. My sister and I also provided tremendous emotional and Local History. He also brought in discovered we were crying. It wasn’t the support and compassion. more than $500,000 in grants to facilitate wind that was making us cry. It was such Executive Director Brian Liesinger, new programs, preserve buildings and a sad sight,” recalls 81-year-old LaDonna who came to us with lasting ties to Heart create special exhibitions. He has fostered Zall, one of our treasured board members Mountain, has also become one of those partnerships with the National Park who saw the last train of incarcerees leave individuals we esteem as a compassionate Service, the Japanese American National Heart Mountain in 1945. A pipeliner’s witness. When his World War II veteran Museum, the Wyoming Humanities daughter and our honorary Nisei, she grandparents acquired rights to collect Council and the Wyoming State Historic remembers the camp’s materials from the Preservation Office. Thank you, Brian, for eight-foot fence and camp, they crafted their all you have done to advance our mission guard towers and homestead from one of and your continued commitment to help continues to advocate the hospital buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies of the Early Reservation Years 1867-1901
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1983 Diversity of assimilation: Case studies of the early reservation years 1867-1901 Ira E. Lax The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Lax, Ira E., "Diversity of assimilation: Case studies of the early reservation years 1867-1901" (1983). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5390. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5390 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright sub­ s i s t s . Any further r e p r in t in g of it s contents must be approved BY THE AUTHOR, Mansfield Library University of Montana Date : __JL 1 8 v «3> THE DIVERSITY OF ASSIMILATION CASE STUDIES OF THE EARLY RESERVATION YEARS, 1867 - 1901 by Ira E. Lax B.A., Oakland University, 1969 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1983 Ap>p|ov&d^ by : f) i (X_x.Aa^ Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate Sdnool Date UMI Number: EP40854 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of Arizona's Principal Military Operations
    Economic Impact Of Arizona’s Principal Military Operations 2008 Prepared by In collaboration with Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter One INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY 1 METHODOLOGY Chapter Two DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 11 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Three EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING AT ARIZONA’S 27 PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Four ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL 32 MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Five STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM 36 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Chapter Six COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN 38 ARIZONA Chapter Seven COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN FY 43 2000 AND FY 2005 APPENDICES Appendix One HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 Appendix Two RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-6 Appendix Three ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-7 Appendix Four DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-19 Appendix Five REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-22 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3-1 Summary of Basic Personnel Statistics 27 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-2 Summary of Military Retiree Statistics 28 Arizona Principal Military Operations Table 3-3 Summary of Payroll and Retirement Benefits 30 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 3-4 Summary of Spending Statistics 31 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 4-1 Summary of Statewide Economic Impacts 34 Arizona’s Major Military Operations Table 5-1 Summary of Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 5-2 Statewide Fiscal Impacts 37 Arizona’s Military Industry Table 6-1 Comparison of Major Industries / Employers in Arizona 41 Table 7-1 Comparison of Military Industry Employment in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 Table 7-2 Comparison of Military Industry Economic Output in 43 FY 2000 and FY 2005 The Maguire Company ESI Corporation Arizona’s Principal Military Operations Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona
    United States Department of the Interior Fish and ,Vildlife Service Arizona Ecological Services Office 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 Fax: (602) 242-2513 In reply refer to: AESO/SE 22410-2006-F-0459 April 13, 2016 Memorandum To: Regional Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico (ARD-ES) (Attn: Michelle Shaughnessy) Chief, Arizona Branch, Re.. gul 7/to . D'vision, Army Corps of Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona From: Acting Field Supervisor~ Subject: Biological and Conference Opinion on the Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan, Arizona This biological and conference opinion (BCO) responds to the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) requirement for intra-Service consultation on the proposed issuance of a section lO(a)(l)(B) incidental take permit (TE-84356A-O) to Pima County and Pima County Regional Flood Control District (both herein referenced as Pima County), pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (ESA), authorizing the incidental take of 44 species (4 plants, 7 mammals, 8 birds, 5 fishes, 2 amphibians, 6 reptiles, and 12 invertebrates). Along with the permit application, Pima County submitted a draft Pima County Multi-Species Conservation Plan (MSCP). On June 10, 2015, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) requested programmatic section 7 consultation for actions under section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CW A), including two Regional General Permits and 16 Nationwide Permits, that are also covered activities in the MSCP. This is an action under section 7 of the ESA that is separate from the section 10 permit issuance to Pima Couny.
    [Show full text]
  • Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp - the New York Times
    11/24/2019 Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp - The New York Times Overlooked No More: Ralph Lazo, Who Voluntarily Lived in an Internment Camp About 115,000 Japanese-Americans on the West Coast were incarcerated after Pearl Harbor, and Lazo, who was Mexican-American, joined them in a bold act of solidarity. July 3, 2019 Overlooked is a series of obituaries about remarkable people whose deaths, beginning in 1851, went unreported in The Times. By Veronica Majerol When Ralph Lazo saw his Japanese-American friends being forced from their homes and into internment camps during World War II, he did something unexpected: He went with them. In the spring of 1942, Lazo, a 17-year-old high school student in Los Angeles, boarded a train and headed to the Manzanar Relocation Center, one of 10 internment camps authorized to house Japanese-Americans under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s executive order in the wake of Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor a few months earlier. The camps, tucked in barren regions of the United States, would incarcerate around 115,000 people living in the West from 1942 to 1946 — two-thirds of them United States citizens. Unlike the other inmates, Lazo did not have to be there. A Mexican-American, he was the only known person to pretend to be Japanese so he could be willingly interned. What compelled Lazo to give up his freedom for two and a half years — sleeping in tar-paper-covered barracks, using open latrines and showers and waiting on long lines for meals in mess halls, on grounds surrounded by barbed-wire fencing and watched by guards in towers? He wanted to be with his friends.
    [Show full text]
  • 79 Stat. ] Public Law 89-188-Sept. 16, 1965 793
    79 STAT. ] PUBLIC LAW 89-188-SEPT. 16, 1965 793 Public Law 89-188 AIM APT September 16, 1Q65 ^^^^^^ [H. R. 10775] To authorize certain eoiistruotion at military installations, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled^ stmction^Aia°hori- zation Act, 1966. TITLE I SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop ^""^y- military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public vv^orks, including site preparations, appurtenances, utilities and equip­ ment for the following projects: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, LESS ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND (First Army) Fort Devens, Massachusetts: Hospital facilities and troop housing, $11,008,000. Fort Dix, New Jersey: Maintenance facilities, medical facilities, and troop housing, $17,948,000. Federal Office Building, Brooklyn, New York: Administrative facilities, $636,000. _ United States Military Academy, West Point, New York: Hospital facilities, troop housing and community facilities, and utilities, $18,089,000. (Second Army) Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Training facilities, and hospital facilities, $2,296,000. East Coast Radio Transmitter Station, Woodbridge, Virginia: Utilities, $211,000. Fort Eustis, Virginia: Utilities, $158,000. Fort Knox, Kentucky: Training facilities, maintenance facilities, troop housing, and community facilities, $15,422,000. Fort Lee, Virginia: Community facilities, $700,000. Fort Meade, Maryland: Ground improvements, $550,000. Fort Monroe, Virginia: Administrative facilities, $4,950,000. Vint Hill Farms, Virginia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $1,029,000. (Third Army) Fort Benning, Georgia: Maintenance facilities, troop housing and utilities, $5,325,000.
    [Show full text]
  • COMANCHE COUNTY Oklahoma
    COMANCHE COUNTY Oklahoma COMMUNITY HEALTH ASSESSMENT Initial Release December 2016 . Revised September 2017 Contents Section One Community Contributors 1 Introduction 2 Mobilizing for Action Through Planning and Partnerships MAPP 3 Section Two Community Description and Demographics 4 Mortality and Leading Causes of Deaths 5 Social Determinants of Health 5 Education, and Income 6 Section Three MAPP Assessments: Community Health Status 7 Community Themes and Strengths 8 Forces of Change 9 Local Public Health System 11 Section Four Five Priority Elements Mental Health 12 Poverty 13 Obesity 14 Violence and Crime 15 Substance Abuse (Tobacco, Alcohol, Drugs) 16 Next Steps 17 Resources References Cited Works R1 Appendix A Comanche County Demographics, US Census Bureau A1 Appendix B Comanche County State of the County Report B1 Appendix C 2014 State of the State’s Health, page 66 C1 Appendix D County Health Ranking and Roadmaps D1 Appendix E Kids Count Report E1 Appendix F Comanche County Community Themes and Strengths Survey Results F1 Appendix G Comanche County Forces of Change Survey Results G1 Appendix H Comanche County Local Public Health System Results H1 Appendix I Comanche County Asset Mapping I1 CHA Updated September 2017 Contents Continued Resources Added – Revised September 2017 Appendix J 500 Cities Project J1 Appendix K Comanche County State of the County Health Report K1 Appendix L Lawton Consolidation Plan L1 Appendix M Lawton Consolidation Plan Aerial View M1 CHA Updated September 2017 Comanche County Community Health Assessment Section 1—page 1 Community Contributors A special thank you to all the Community Contributors who volunteer their time and energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Microfilm Publication M617, Returns from U.S
    Publication Number: M-617 Publication Title: Returns from U.S. Military Posts, 1800-1916 Date Published: 1968 RETURNS FROM U.S. MILITARY POSTS, 1800-1916 On the 1550 rolls of this microfilm publication, M617, are reproduced returns from U.S. military posts from the early 1800's to 1916, with a few returns extending through 1917. Most of the returns are part of Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General's Office; the remainder is part of Record Group 393, Records of United States Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920, and Record Group 395, Records of United States Army Overseas Operations and Commands, 1898-1942. The commanding officer of every post, as well ad commanders of all other bodies of troops such as department, division, brigade, regiment, or detachment, was required by Army Regulations to submit a return (a type of personnel report) to The Adjutant General at specified intervals, usually monthly, on forms provided by that office. Several additions and modifications were made in the form over the years, but basically it was designed to show the units that were stationed at a particular post and their strength, the names and duties of the officers, the number of officers present and absent, a listing of official communications received, and a record of events. In the early 19th century the form used for the post return usually was the same as the one used for regimental or organizational returns. Printed forms were issued by the Adjutant General’s Office, but more commonly used were manuscript forms patterned after the printed forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Forrestine Cooper Hooker's Notes and Memoirs on Army Life in the West, 1871-1876, Arranged, Edited, and Annotated by Barbara E
    Forrestine Cooper Hooker's notes and memoirs on army life in the West, 1871-1876, arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E. Fisher Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Fisher, Barbara Esther, 1939- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 03:17:15 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551645 FORRESTINE COOPER HOOKER'S NOTES AND MEMOIRS ON ARMY LIFE IN THE WEST, 1871 - 18?6 arranged, edited, and annotated by Barbara E, Fisher A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Department of Veterans' Services DIRECTORY
    Arizona Department of Veterans’ Services DIRECTORY November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION UPDATE FORM FOR VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS………. 3 ARIZONA VETERANS’ SERVICE ADVISORY COMMISSION…………………. 4 MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPENTS ― ARIZONA…………………………………….. 5 NATIONAL SERVICE OFFICERS ― ARIZONA……………………………………… 7 AZDVS VETERAN BENEFITS COUNSELORS (VBC’s)………………………… 9 VETERAN SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS; ARIZONA SERVICE OFFICERS…. 10 OTHER VETERANS’ SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS……………………….…… 21 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS………………………………..... 33 ARIZONA VA MEDICAL CENTERS………………………………………………. 33 COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT CLINICS (CBOC’s)……………………… 34 VETERAN CENTERS; VA CEMETERY ― ARIZONA….………………………... 37 OTHER FEDERAL/STATE AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS ― AZ……..… 37 ARIZONA MILITARY INSTALLATIONS…………………………………………... 44 MILITARY DEPT. OF FINANCE & RETIREE ASSISTANCE…………………… 47 ARIZONA U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION……………………………... 49 ARIZONA EXECUTIVE OFFICIALS………………………………………………. 52 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE DIRECTORS OF VETERANS’ AFFAIRS (NASDVA)…………………………………………………… 54 STATE VETERAN HOMES WITHIN THE U.S…………………………………… 63 2 INFORMATION UPDATE FORM FOR VETERANS’ ORGANIZATIONS When there are changes or corrections required, organizations should complete this form and submit it to the following address: Mail to: Arizona Dept. of Veterans’ Services Corrections or Updates: ATTN: Office of the Director Information may be phoned in: 3839 North 3rd Street, Suite 200 Telephone: (602) 234-8406 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Facsimile: (602) 255-1038 E-mail to: [email protected] FROM: ORGANIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • November 25, 1974 3:20 P
    File scanned from the National Security Adviser's Memoranda of Conversation Collection at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ,I} \ > MEMORANDUM THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON ~ /SENSITIVE/XGDS MEMORANDUM OF CONVERSATION PARTICIPANTS: President Ford James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of Defense Lt. General Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs DATE AND TIME: Monday, November 25, 1974 3:20 p. m. PLACE: The Oval Office The White House SUBJECTS: Vladivostok SALT Accord: Base Closings Schlesinger: The Soviets have met their match. They are night people and they usually wear Americans out. You can keep up with them. President: I think we had a good serious meeting and I think the results are such that we can ••• Schlesinger: Your accomplishments on this one are phenomenal. President: I am glad to hear it. If we are criticized I think it will be by the left. The figures are higher than we would like, but it puts a rigid ceiling and makes them modify their program and gives us flexibility. For launchers it is a limit of 2,400; for MIRV'd launchers it is 1,320. There will be no new sites. Missiles on bombers, if they have a range of over 600 kilometers, are counted as launchers. That is it. DEClASSIFIED E.O. 12958 (as amended) SEC 3.3 Schlesinger: Is there freedom to mix? MR# -'1,8-",' • leo t>5b~ 1.R:tlorr,· "A..u.... .3lniloi Iliftk ~ ":10"0 President: Yes. 8v ~.JtARA. Date 10 Is-I, 0 S~SENsrrIVE/XGDS SEC RET - X,-,J3 (.) o .~LASSIEJED> BY; HENRY A.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 141 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1995 No. 98 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Fowler Kildee Neal Fox Kim Nethercutt called to order by the Speaker pro tem- question is on the Chair's approval of Frank (MA) King Neumann pore [Mr. TORKILDSEN]. the Journal. Franks (CT) Kingston Ney f The question was taken; and the Franks (NJ) Klink Norwood Speaker pro tempore announced that Frelinghuysen Klug Nussle DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO Frisa Knollenberg Obey the ayes appeared to have it. Frost Kolbe Olver TEMPORE Ms. DELAURO. Mr. Speaker, I object Furse LaHood Ortiz The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- to the vote on the ground that a Gallegly Lantos Orton fore the House the following commu- quorum is not present and make the Ganske Largent Owens Gejdenson Latham Oxley nication from the Speaker: point of order that a quorum is not Gekas LaTourette Packard WASHINGTON, DC, present. Gilchrest Laughlin Pallone June 15, 1995. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Evi- Gilman Lazio Parker I hereby designate the Honorable PETER G. dently a quorum is not present. Gonzalez Lewis (CA) Pastor Goodlatte Lewis (KY) Paxon TORKILDSEN to act as Speaker pro tempore The Sergeant at Arms will notify ab- Goodling Lightfoot Payne (NJ) on this day. sent Members. Gordon Lincoln Payne (VA) NEWT GINGRICH, Goss Linder Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives. The vote was taken by electronic de- vice, and there wereÐyeas 356, nays 49, Graham Lipinski Peterson (FL) f Green Livingston Peterson (MN) answered ``present'' 2, not voting 27, as Greenwood LoBiondo Petri PRAYER follows: Gunderson Lofgren Porter [Roll No.
    [Show full text]