Instability, , and Anticyclogenesis The concept of instability ! When pressure systems intensify, the increased pressure gradient increases speeds

! Two ways this happens in the atmosphere:

! Conversion of available potential energy to kinetic energy through the lifting of warm air and sinking of cold air Baroclinic instability

! Conversion of kinetic energy of the mean flow into the kinetic energy of the growing disturbance Barotropic instability Barotropic instability ! [1.94] ! Discovered by Kuo in the late 1940’s ( . f ..,. C+ I ! A necessary condition for barotropic instability in a zonal current is where the gradient in absolute vanishes ! This condition is often met near jets where u o nlit ,clonic g . hear s id e of jet and the background flow ! go to zero and y the wave’s ! can grow - . ." Q"hcyclon,c - Sh OOf . ,,'" '--- -. Baroclinic instability ! Consider a simple example of a coin sitting on a table

! Standing on its side, a z coin has available 0 potential energy given by its mass times gravity times the height z0 of the center of mass (above right) minus the potential energy of the coin sitting on its side (below right) Baroclinic instability (continued) ! “Tipping” the coin over will convert available potential energy to kinetic energy

! The coin still has some z0 potential energy, but it is unavailable to the system ! The earth’s atmosphere is more complicated, because it is compressible and the earth rotates Sanders analytic model ! We will use an analytic model developed by Fred Sanders in 1971 to understand the baroclinic instability process on in the real atmosphere ! To the board! y L 0.0 0.0 4"-'1',---- 0 0

/---...... , / 6' / '°0 0 \ 0 o

,,,, ,,,, x L L 0 L L -"2 -4" 4" "2 Figure 1.27 Isopleths of 1000-mb height at intervals of 6 dam in Sanders' analytic 2 model. <1>0 = 1020 m S-2, and A = L/4. The abscissa is the x direction; the ordinate is the y direction. is an infinite checkerboard of warm and cold perturbation centers - [t cos(2.7l'/ L)x cos(2.7l'/ L)y] superimposed upon a field of uniform meridional temperature gradient (-ay). The x direction points toward the east, and the y direction points toward the north. The parameter L is the (isotropic) horizontal wavelength, and A is the phase lag of the lOOO-mb temperature field

y .L....

0 f 0 ci \ 0 N 0 N J L "'4" x L L o L L -"2 "'4" 4" "2 Figure 1.28 Isotherms at 1000 mb in °C (solid lines) in Sanders' analytic model. 5 1 a = 1.0 x 10- °C m- , f = 10°C, and L = 3500 km. The abscissa is the x direction; the ordinate is the y direction. [1.30] y h 4 552. ...r

/'

0

H 576.

56". _h 4 X l l 0 l -2 -'4 '4 2 Figure 1.30 500-mb height at intervals of 6 dam (solid lines) in Sanders' analytic model. The value of ll' is 0.722, and «11m (500 mb)/g =5555 m. The abscissa is the x direction; the ordinate is the y direction.

500 hPa height at intervals of 6 dm in Sanders’ analytic model. (" = 0.722, !m/g = 5555 m) ! Derivations on board – see text / / / I...... , /

L (103 km)

Figure 'l.96 Deepening rate (a/at) of the 1000-mb as a function of wavelength (L) and meridional temperature gradient (ordinate) for selected values of the vorticity-stability parameter and for f = 1°C. The isopleths are labeled in 3 2 units of 10- m S-3. The dashed, solid, and dotted lines are for values of the vorticity-stability parameter as in Fig. 1.39. The longer dashed lines are loci of the wavelength of maximum deepening rate (from Sanders, 1971). (Courtesy of the American Meteorological Society) Sanders’ analytic model: height tendency

"# & L ( 2*% $ %, 0, 1000 hPa = (K13P13 $ K14 P14 )sin "t ' 2 ) L

ˆ Physical effect: vertical motion accompanying f0RaTL vertical motion due to of relative vorticity K13 = 4"T0# by the thermal wind ! Related to L, static stability ", and meridional temperature gradient a

! 2 ˆ 3 Physical effect: vertical motion accompanying f0 T" L advection of the earth’s vorticity (a.k.a. beta effect) K14 = 3 4(2#) T0$ by the thermal wind Related to L3, static stability ", and meridional temperature gradient a.

!

Analysis ! If there were no beta effect, troughs of all wavelengths would deepen ! The wavelength that this happens is called the long wave cutoff. ! At short wavelengths, advection of geostrostropic vorticity is dominant – but Q-G assumptions get violated. ! Sanders’ model shows deepening rate going to 0 – short wave cutoff ! The most occurs at wavelengths between 1500 and 3000 km Analysis, cont.

! Since K13 is proportional to a and inversely proportional to ", baroclinic instability increases with meridional temperature gradient, and decreases with static stability ! This makes sense since the thermal wind is proportional to a, and the magnitude of vertical motion predicted by the omega equation is inversely proportional to static stability ! The magnitude of the vertical circulation that lifts/ sinks warm/cold air (converting APE to KE) is proportional to a and 1/"# ! Seasonal effects? Baroclinic instability and the flow pattern ! Sanders’ model is limited for many reasons ! Why? ! Must be careful in interpreting its solution ! It has been noted since the 1930s that the shape of the troughs have something to do with their likelihood to produce a cyclone ! Bjerknes (1954) and Polster (1960) identified that the majority of cyclones intensify under diffluent troughs ! Only a few occur under confluent troughs ! Why? Diffluent Confluent Tilting troughs ! Waves in the whose axes slope in the direction of the flow with latitude are called positively tilted. ! Associated with poleward fluxes of angular momentum ! Negatively tilted troughs slope against the direction of the flow with latitude in the westerlies. ! Associated with equatorward fluxes of angular momentum, also removing momentum from westerly jet and growing system due to barotropic instability Why do waves tilt? ! Consider the Rossby wave phase dispersion relation: U " # c = 2 % 2$' & L (

! What happens when ! ! U increases with latitude? ! U decreases with latitude?

! Fractured waves? Fractured Cont. Cont. Bombs ! occurs most frequently over the during the cold season.

Definition: Pressure fall of 1 mb/h for 24 hours (termed a bergeron)

Vertical cross section through a bomb Seclusion

Polar low/instant occlusion

Dryline-front intersection low Subtropical high Idealized structures of baroclinic waves in the westerlies ! Based on surface obs in Europe, Bjerknes, Bergeron, and Solberg of the Bergen “Norwegian School” formulated the Polar-Front Theory: cyclones form on fronts ! Now, it is generally accepted that surface cyclones often*** intensify when DPVA downstream of an upper level trough encounters a frontal zone at the surface (Palmen and Newton 1955)

***not always!

East coast lows Other types of cyclones

! Colorado lows ! Alps lows

! Flow over topography, subsidence generates cyclonic low level relative vorticity -> not sufficient to generate a propagating cyclone ! Short wave aloft triggers cyclogenesis ! Low initially moves southeasterly (higher terrain to the right combined with warm air advection to the east) ! Low then moves more easterly apart from topography, usually towards Chicago in North America. Homework ! Create a Miller-type Diagram consisting of the key parameters conducive for severe weather for the period 18Z-06Z tomorrow covering the region outlined on the SPC risk map ! Write a SPC-style mesoscale discussion which textually describes the ingredients regarding the potential for severe weather during this period. Use the convective forecasting handbook.

! Submit via COMPASS as a PPT file, due tomorrow at 21Z