Sources and Characterization of Particles Affecting Transparency In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sources and Characterization of Particles Affecting Transparency In Sources and Characterization of Particles Affecting Transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir Prepared by: James H. McCutchan, Jr. June 10, 2015 Rpt 339 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background Information on Grand Lake and Its Water Sources 3 Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Lakes in 2012 5 Hydrology 5 General Characteristics of Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir: 2012 13 Background Information on Transparency in Lakes 30 Measurement of Transparency and Other Optical Properties of Water 30 Factors Affecting Transparency 33 The Transparency Record 51 Secchi Transparency 52 Attenuation Coefficients 56 Turbidity 59 Separation of Transparency Components 63 Dissolved Organic Matter 63 Phytoplankton 63 Non-Algal Particles 64 Spectral Interactions 64 Regression Analysis of Variation in Transparency 71 Sources and Sinks of Particles 79 Import of Particles by Tributaries 79 In Situ Production of Particles 85 Sinks for Particles 90 Mass Balance of Particles 96 Stable Isotope Ratios 102 Conclusions about Transparency 108 Primary Controlling Factors 109 Implications for Management Alternatives 116 References 119 Appendix I. 121 i Summary Northern Water, Grand County, and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation sponsored a multi- year study of particles affecting transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir. This report summarizes and interprets information that was collected as part of the study. Results of this study will be used to support the development of appropriate management and control measures to improve transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir. This study included three main components: routine monitoring, mapping studies, and watershed studies. Routine monitoring included field measurements, sampling, and analyses for locations on Shadow Mountain Reservoir, Grand lake, and their tributaries at points near the lakes. Mapping studies (2012 and 2014) included field measurements across many locations on the lakes. Watershed studies (2013 – 2014) included field measurements, sampling, and analyses for multiple locations within the Colorado River watershed, as necessary to identify locations of particle sources. Variation in hydrologic conditions over the study period has provided an opportunity to study controls on transparency over a wide range of conditions. Grand Lake is strongly affected by its native water sources during snowmelt runoff, but its characteristics typically change after peak runoff due to the introduction of water from Shadow Mountain Reservoir. The changes include higher specific conductance, higher nutrient concentrations, and higher particle concentrations. The effect of pumped water on Grand Lake was less in 2013 and 2014 than in 2012, but Grand Lake still was strongly affected in 2013 and 2014 because the effects of pumping persist even after pumping has stopped. The optical properties of natural waters are determined by the combined optical properties of water molecules, dissolved substances, and suspended particles. As light passes ii through water, photons are lost through absorption, and scattering increases the probability of absorption. Transparency is the property of allowing transmission of light without absorption or scattering. Transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir was measured as Secchi transparency, which is the depth within the water column to which a reflective disk remains visible to an observer at the surface. Attenuation coefficients were determined from profiles of irradiance (photon flux) over a range of wavelengths with an underwater quantum sensor. With these measurements of transparency and measurements of dissolved and suspended substances in individual water samples, different approaches were used to determine the effects of individual components affecting transparency. Results show that transparency in the lakes is determined largely by concentrations of particles in surface water. In general, non-algal organic particles had the greatest effect on transparency, but inorganic particles and algal particles also were important. Chromatic dissolved organic matter affects transparency but accounts for only a small portion of variance. For a given mass of particles, organic particles (algal particles, non-algal organic particles) had a greater effect on transparency than inorganic particles, but the overall effect of inorganic particles on transparency was only slightly lower than the overall effect of non-algal organic particles or algal particles. The dominant sources of non-algal organic particles, as determined by analysis of stable isotope ratios, were the Granby Pump Canal and the native tributaries. Macrophytes, although abundant in Shadow Mountain Reservoir, were not an important source of suspended particles, and the abundance of macrophytes may increase, rather than decrease, transparency in the lakes. Particles transported by the native tributaries and the Granby Pump Canal often dominate the suspended particles in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir. For the native iii tributaries, particle concentrations tend to increase with discharge, especially for the North Fork of the Colorado River. When flows in the native tributaries are low, the Granby Pump Canal can be the major source of particles reaching the lakes, but concentrations of particles in the Pump Canal are much lower than the highest concentrations carried by the North Fork of the Colorado River. Thus, water carried by the Granby Pump Canal sometimes is a source of dilution for more concentrated sources of particles (e.g., the North Fork of the Colorado River at times of high discharge). Four primary factors ultimately control most of the variation in particle concentrations in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir (Table A). For a given set of conditions, it is possible to predict particle concentrations and transparency in the lakes (Table B). For any set of conditions that produces concentrations of suspended particles greater than ~2.5 mg/L, Secchi transparency is not likely to exceed 4 m. However, because of the stochastic nature of the primary factors affecting particle concentrations, there is considerable variation in transparency for any given time of year, and precise predictions of transparency are possible only over short periods of time. Identification of the primary factors affecting particle concentrations and transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir provides information on possible management alternatives that could be used to improve Secchi transparency in the lakes (Table C). Some of the management alternatives listed in Table C may not be feasible, and some would have unwanted consequences on water quality in Shadow Mountain Reservoir or elsewhere in the C- BT system. iv Factor Mechanism Native flows Particle conc. for tributaries increase with discharge; WRT decreases Season (time of year) Temp. affects algal growth, mixed depth; snow cover affects particle yield Lake depth Resuspension of particles; internal loading of nutrients Farr pumping Pumping changes water source for SMR, GL; affects WRT, mixed depth Table A. Primary factors affecting particle concentrations and transparency in Shadow Mountain Reservoir and Grand Lake. WRT = water residence time; SMR = Shadow Mountain Reservoir; GL = Grand Lake. Factors Characteristic particle Characteristic Secchi Native Farr concentration, mg/L transparency, m flows Season pumping SMR GL SMR GL High Warm On 5 3 1.5 2 Low Warm On 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 High Cool On 3 2 2 3 Low Cool On 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 High Warm Off 5 2 2 3 Low Warm Off 8 1 1 4 High Cool Off 3 2 2 3 Low Cool Off 3 <1 2 5 - 8 Table B. Characteristic particle concentrations and Secchi transparency in Shadow Mountain Reservoir and Grand Lake for different combinations of factors under current operations of the C-BT system. Secchi transparency is estimated here from TSS, according to the relationship given in Figure 56. Shading indicates sets of conditions with Secchi transparency outside the range of ~2 – 4 m that is typical under present operations of the C-BT system. Factor Management alternatives Native flows Diversion of Colo. R. at high flow (e.g., via Redtop); sedimentation basins Lake depth Control sources of suspended particles in SMR; deepen Shadow Mtn. Res. Season (time of year) Alteration of GL mixed depth; nutrient control of phytoplankton growth Farr pumping Major alteration of C-BT; operational control; line Pump Canal Table C. Some management alternatives corresponding to primary factors affecting transparency. v Introduction Suspended particles, including suspended algae, contribute substantially to light attenuation in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir. A study conducted in the summer of 2009 showed that the concentration of non-algal suspended particles was the most important factor affecting transparency in both lakes at that time (McCutchan 2010). However, the relative importance of algal versus non-algal particles varies seasonally and across years, and the sources and composition of non-algal suspended particles were not well resolved. From the results of the 209 study, it was apparent that a clear understanding of the effects of algal and non-algal particles on transparency in Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir under present and future operations would require the study of particles in both lakes and their water sources, including North Inlet, East Inlet, the North Fork of the Colorado River, and the Granby Pump Canal. Storm runoff not associated with tributaries
Recommended publications
  • Operational and Water Quality Summary Report for Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir 2010
    Operational and Water Quality Summary Report for Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir 2010 Revision 1 Operational and Water Quality Summary Report for Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir 2010 This report was prepared for: Grand County Northern Water U.S. Bureau of Reclamation by: Jean Marie Boyer, PhD., PE, Hydros Consulting Inc. Christine Hawley, M.S., Hydros Consulting Inc. We wish to thank members of the Three Lakes Nutrient Study Technical Committee and external reviewers for their thoughtful review of, and comments on, the draft of this report. Your comments led to valuable insights and helped to produce a more in-depth analysis. December 2, 2011 Revision 1: Replaced Figures 28 and 74 with corrected versions. Issued March 16, 2012 December 2, 2011 Page i Operational and Water Quality Summary Report for Grand Lake and Shadow Mountain Reservoir 2010 Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................ 1 A. Statement of Problem and Background Information ..................................................................... 1 B. Purpose and Scope of Report ............................................................................................................. 4 II. Three Lakes System Operations ...................................................... 5 III. Factors Impacting Water Clarity ...................................................... 7 IV. Data and Analysis ............................................................................ 10 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Lake Constitution Week
    Grand Lake Constitution Week Honest and loanable Tull tided so alow that Raleigh denaturizes his gynandromorphism. Les never socialize any annotators oppress lankly, is Teddie running and clovery enough? Suppurative and quickset Lanny still report his dandy largo. Free grand lake constitution week is constitutional experts speak and more than four sets a request is nestled among the. United States Constitution a Racist Document Monday evening 6 o'clock pm at Cork after the Water 1007 Lake Ave Grand Lake CO 0447. Mass at the constitution, crossing the grand lake plans to. Did he find a gun lost lake Sentences 6 Extension Have students write two statements and two questions about an art adventure. Brendan and grand lake, activities in a week event founder of close out. If you grand lake constitution week celebration of white water the constitutional to expect delays if a democrat in a bear gets in. Booked a cold showing the hustle and the celebration of the crash involving the lake grand constitution week merchandise for. Grand Escape Cottages 970 627-3410 Lodging in Grand. But not able to lake constitution week event spaces will improve today to officials who also know what are the lakes. Grand lake events page to this wonderful celebration in the biden foundation promotes local black hills of santa fe railway that is. Visit picture Lake Colorado a charming mountain property at to entrance to Rocky. Do in grand county dog shelter facebook page on grand lake constitution week coming to the week coming to reviews and vessel positions on grand! Help guide has to afflict the constitution week bbq and splashing in.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • Fired up Kremmling, CO 80459
    Page 2 GRAND GAZETTE www.grandgazette.net September 20, 2018 To the editor.... Colburn Family thanks for all who Jilly's closes doors with a thank you extended their help We would like to thank everyone who It was nice to know so many cared On behalf of Jilly’s, we want to considerations. Thank you to all who extended their help, vehicles and trailers and were willing to help gather and haul extend our thanks and love to the town of supported us. We are sincerely grateful to help get our pairs evacuated from our our cows and calves. Kremmling, and to Grand County. We for the many beautiful friendships we acreage near the Peak Ranch. A special have had an amazing adventure opening have made along the way. Our family thanks goes to Jeannine Jones, Sheridan The Colburn Family and running Jilly’s for the past five years. is staying in the community and we look Myer, Pat Pryor, Brian Manuel and Tim We have had much love and support forward to our further adventures in Wall. from our community, and we have felt Kremmling and Grand County. See you honored to participate in and contribute around! to many organizations and fundraisers. Stuwe We have enjoyed a special camaraderie Ken, Kendra, Jill, Andrew, with the other restaurants in Kremmling- and Galen Wilkinson, Carol chosen to be -we are all in competition to a point, but Hochstrasser, and the Amazing we are a community first! (with a capital A) crew of Jilly’s Honorflight It was difficult to make the decision to close, and there were many Arizona Korean War veteran Don Preschool aviation history adventure day thank you Stuwe was chosen to be on Honorflight Arizona on 56 children, 18 adults, 8 aviation September 4, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Granby Fishery Management Report Jon Ewert, Aquatic Biologist, Colorado Parks and Wildlife February 2019
    Lake Granby Fishery Management Report Jon Ewert, Aquatic Biologist, Colorado Parks and Wildlife February 2019 Introduction Lake Granby, approximately 7,250 surface acres when full, is one of the largest coldwater reservoirs in the state. It is the main storage reservoir in the west slope portion of the Colorado-Big Thompson Project which supplies water to the northern Front Range through the Adams Tunnel at Grand Lake. It is a focal point of the Grand County tour- ism economy and offers many amenities. Recreational access is managed by the U.S. Forest Service as part of the Arapaho National Recreation Area. The recreational fishery of Granby is dominated by lake trout (aka mackinaw) and hosts the highest density of the species that has been documented in Colorado. Kokan- ee salmon have been stocked in Granby since 1951 to pro- vide recreational opportunity, a prey base to produce tro- phy lake trout, and spawning adults are captured annually to provide eggs for restocking. Rainbow trout of various sizes are also stocked and there is a moderate density of self-sustaining brown trout. Suckers and mottled sculpin Figure 1. Lake Granby are also present. Lake Granby also contains a dense population of mysis separate from the aggregate bag limit of other species. shrimp, which are an excellent prey source for smaller Due to reasons described above, the lake trout fishery in (<24”) lake trout. The high density of lake trout is a result Lake Granby is healthiest when a generous amount of har- of the availability of this prey base. However, the mysis vest is occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Coldwater Lake and Reservoir Research Projects
    Coldwater Lake and Reservoir Research Projects Adam G. Hansen, Ph.D. Aquatic Research Scientist Annual Report Colorado Parks & Wildlife Aquatic Research Section 317 West Prospect Road Fort Collins, Colorado May 2018 STATE OF COLORADO John W. Hickenlooper, Governor COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bob Randall, Executive Director COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Bob Broscheid, Director WILDLIFE COMMISSION John V. Howard, Vice-Chair Marvin McDaniel Michelle Zimmerman, Secretary Robert “Dean” Wingfield Robert W. Bray James Vigil Marie Haskett Dale E. Pizel Carrie Hauser Jim Spehar Alexander Zipp Ex Officio/Non-Voting Members: Don Brown, Bob Randall and Bob Broscheid AQUATIC RESEARCH STAFF George J. Schisler, Aquatic Research Leader Kelly Carlson, Aquatic Research Program Assistant Peter Cadmus, Aquatic Research Scientist/Toxicologist, Water Pollution Studies Eric R. Fetherman, Aquatic Research Scientist, Salmonid Disease Studies Ryan Fitzpatrick, Aquatic Research Scientist, Eastern Plains Native Fishes Eric E. Richer, Aquatic Research Scientist/Hydrologist, Stream Habitat Restoration Matthew C. Kondratieff, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream Habitat Restoration Dan Kowalski, Aquatic Research Scientist, Stream & River Ecology Adam G. Hansen, Aquatic Research Scientist, Coldwater Lakes and Reservoirs Kevin B. Rogers, Aquatic Research Scientist, Colorado Cutthroat Studies Kevin G. Thompson, Aquatic Research Scientist, 3-Species and Boreal Toad Studies Andrew J. Treble, Aquatic Research Scientist, Aquatic Data Management and Analysis Brad Neuschwanger, Hatchery Manager, Fish Research Hatchery Tracy Davis, Hatchery Technician, Fish Research Hatchery David Karr, Hatchery Technician, Fish Research Hatchery Jim Guthrie, Federal Aid Coordinator Alexandria Austermann, Librarian 2 Table of Contents I. Limnology, Zooplankton and Mysis Project A. Physical limnology, zooplankton and Mysis collections from Blue Mesa Reservoir, Lake Granby, and Taylor Park Reservoir (2016-2017)….…………..............................
    [Show full text]
  • SURVEY of REAERATION NEEDS on BUREAU of RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N Z G 3
    PAP 2 HYDRAULICS BRANCH OFFICIAL FILE COPY c SURVEY OF REAERATION NEEDS ON BUREAU OF RECLAMATION PROJECTS ,-->,-\ N z g 3 by E. J. Carlson Hydraulics Branch Division of General Research Engineering and Research Center Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado February 1972 OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1001 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.0 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum Memorandum Denver, Colorado TO Chief, Division of General Research, DATE: June 30, 1972 Regional Director, Region 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 FROM E. J. Carlson SUBJECT: Completion of Study Team Report The report, "Survey of Reaeration Needs on Bureau Projects," was prepared from data obtained mainly from Regional Personnel. Copies of the report are being furnished to all regional offices. By this memorandum regional offices are asked to review the report and make suggestions for changes and additions. The information may be helpful in starting projects which will be required in the near future to meet states' water quality standards. Problem areas in one region may serve as reminders for future problem areas in other regions. The Reaeration Research Program Management Team is available to assist Bureau offices in solving problems caused by oxygen deficiency in reser- voirs, lakes, streams,-canals, and aquifers. The information in the report will also be used by other public agencies and private companies and individuals. The report includes survey-type information and does not reflect policy of the Bureau. i Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan SOIU-108 ACKNOWLEDGMENT The survey of reaeration needs on Bureau of Reclamation Projects was conducted in the Hydraulics Branch under the supervision of the Reaeration Research Program Management Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Aquatic Invasive Species Watercraft Inspection and Water Monitoring Summary 2015
    WYOMING AQUATIC INVASIVE SPECIES WATERCRAFT INSPECTION AND WATER MONITORING SUMMARY 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Casper Region 1 Alcova Reservoir…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 2 Glendo Reservoir ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….. 5 North Platte River ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…. 8 Pathfinder Reservoir …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. 10 Torrington Port of Entry………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….. 12 Laramie Region 15 Cheyenne I-25 POE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ….….. 16 Cheyenne I-80 POE ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19 Laramie HWY 287 POE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 22 Granite Reservoir …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... 25 Grayrocks Reservoir ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 28 Guernsey Reservoir................................................................................................................................................ 31 Lake Hattie …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 34 Hawk Springs Reservoir ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 35 North Platte River – Treasure Island Access ......................………………………………………………………………………………... 36 Rob Roy Reservoir ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 37 Sarataoga Lake ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............ 39 Seminoe Reservoir ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........
    [Show full text]
  • Little Buckaroo Ranch Barn National Register
    United States Department of the Interior NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 2280 National Register of Historic Places 1201 "I" (Eye) Street, NW Washington D.C. 20005 The Director of the National Park Service is pleased to announce actions on the following properties for the National Register of Historic Places. For further information contact Edson Beall at (202) 354-2255 or E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site at http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr WEEKLY LIST OF ACTIONS TAKEN ON PROPERTIES: 7/06/09 THROUGH 7/10/09 KEY: State, County, Property Name, Address/Boundary, City, Vicinity, Reference Number, NHL, Action, Date, Multiple Name ARIZONA, PIMA COUNTY, Agua Caliente Ranch Rural Historic Landscape, 12325 E. Roger Rd., Tucson vicinity, 04001246, LISTED, 7/09/09 (Cattle Ranching in Arizona MPS) CALIFORNIA, ORANGE COUNTY, Cogged Stone Site--CA-ORA-83, Address Restricted, Huntington Beach vicinity, 01001455, DETERMINED ELIGIBLE, 7/10/09 COLORADO, EL PASO COUNTY, North Cheyenne Canon Park, 2120 N. Cheyenne Canon Rd., Colorado Springs, 09000489, LISTED, 7/08/09 COLORADO, GRAND COUNTY, Little Buckaroo Ranch Barn, 20631 Trail Ridge Rd., Rocky Mountain National Park, Grand Lake vicinity, 09000490, LISTED, 7/08/09 GEORGIA, CHATHAM COUNTY, Eureka Club--Farr's Point, 2326 E. Blvd., Savannah vicinity, 09000491, LISTED, 7/08/09 GEORGIA, JASPER COUNTY, Pope-Talmadge House, 2560 Calvin Rd., Monticello vicinity, 09000492, LISTED, 7/08/09 ILLINOIS, COOK COUNTY, Ethnic (European) Historic Settlements of the City of Chicago, 1861-1930 MPS 64501044, COVER DOCUMENTATION ACCEPTED, 6/26/09 NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. REC-ERC-90-L, “Compilation Report on the Effects
    REC-ERC-SO-1 January 1990 Denver Office U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation 7-2090 (4-81) Bureau of Reclamation TECHNICAL REEPORT STANDARD TITLE PAG 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG ~0. 5. REPORT DATE Compilation Report on the Effects January 1990 of Reservoir Releases on 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE Downstream Ecosystems D-3742 7. AUTHOR(S) 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION E. Cheslak REPORT NO. J. Carpenter REC-ERC-90-1 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Denver CO 80225 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Same 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE DIBR 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Microfiche and/or hard copy available at the Denver Office, Denver, Colorado. Ed: RDM 16. ABSTRACT Most of the dams built by the Bureau of Reclamation were completed before environmental regulations such as the Clean Water Act, National Environmental Protection Act, or Toxic Substances Control Act existed. The management and operation of dams was instituted under conditions where the ecology of the downstream habitat was unknown and largely ignored. Changing or modifying structures, flow regimes, and land use patterns are some of the efforts being pursued by the Bureau to reconcile or mitigate the effects of impoundment to comply with these environmental policies and to maximize the potential for recreation, fisheries, and water quality in tailwater habitats for the water resource users. The purpose of this report is to provide a reference document intended to aid in the management, compliance, and problem solving processes necessary to accomplish these goals in Bureau tailwater habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Grand County Colorado Tourism Board Press Kit
    GRAND COUNTY COLORADO TOURISM BOARD PRESS KIT Media Contact Gaylene Ore Ore Communications, Inc. [email protected] 970-531-2336 Table of Contents Fact Sheet…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...2-3 Grand County Communities…………..….…………………………………………………………...………………....…..……4 Get Your “Ing” On……..………………………………….……………………..………………………………………...……..5-6 Grand County Year-Round Destination…..………………………………………………………………………………………7 Water, Water Everywhere………………………………………………………………………………………………………..8-9 Rocky Mountain National Park………………..………………………………….……………………………………...............10 Grand County Dude Ranches …..………….………………………………………………………………..…….…………11-12 Scenic Drives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…......13 Mountain Golf.…….………….…………………………………………………………………………………...…..……………14 Western Heritage…….………………………………………………………………………………………………….....……....15 Meetings and Gatherings……………….……………………………………………………………………………...………….16 5-days of Summer..........…………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…17-18 5-days of Winter..........…………………………………………………………………………………………..……………...…19 About Grand County, Colo. (www.visitgrandcounty.com) Located 67 miles west of Denver, Grand County is home to wide-open spaces, breathtaking mountain scenery and authentic old-west towns. Outdoor recreational activities include golf, boating, fishing, biking, hiking, fishing, hunting, horseback riding, skiing, cross country skiing, snowmobiling, ice fishing, sleigh rides and tubing. The area features more than 600 miles of mapped and marked trails, one national park, two
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operations Water Year 2017
    Colorado-Big Thompson Project Operations Water Year 2017 Presented by Victor Lee P.E. Hydrologic Engineer Eastern Colorado Area Office Topics: • Colorado-Big Thompson Project Overview – Colorado River Collection System – Green Mountain Reservoir Three Lakes System - Keystone of Colorado River Collection System Colorado River Collection System • Supports Colorado River storage and diversion Colorado-Big Thompson Project • Includes Lake Granby, Shadow Mountain Reservoir, Grand Lake and Lake Granby in 2014 Willow Creek Reservoir • Also used for storage of Windy Gap and 10825 Fishery Water Reservoir Operations: Colorado-Big Thompson Collection System • Lake Granby is projected to physically fill (537 KAF) by July 15 – Colorado River releases directed by Interior Secretary order 75 cfs for May-August – Lake Granby is anticipated to have minimal or no spill – Higher than average runoff for Willow Creek Reservoir – No Windy Gap pumping – 10825 Colorado Endangered Fish Recovery releases in late summer-early fall – Grand Lake Clarity Adaptive Management implemented for 2016 continued in 2017 Physical Fill: Second Week of July 10825 Water used to augment releases in late summer and early fall Green Mountain Reservoir • Provides water storage for Upper Colorado River Basin beneficial use • Replacement water for Colorado River Collection System • Hydropower generation Green Mountain Reservoir Reservoir Operations: Green Mountain • Green Mountain Reservoir is projected to physically fill (154 KAF) around July 10 – No spill: maximum release around 1450 cfs – Release water for west-slope beneficial use – Expect to support the Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program • Coordinated Reservoir Operations (CROS) • HUP Surplus Releases in September-October – Higher than Average Denver Water and Colorado Springs Utilities carry over storage contribute to higher than average inflow Coordinated Reservoir Operations HUP Irrigation Season Releases Fill Date Second Week of July Thank you Questions? Granby Spill in 2015.
    [Show full text]