Coverfinal 123 FINAL.Qxd 6/21/02 6:30 AM Page 2
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
28-32 a Scherer Nauvoo from Coc Perspective.Qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28
28-32_a_scherer_nauvoo from coc perspective.qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28 SUNSTONE What does Nauvoo mean today to members of the Community of Christ (formerly RLDS Church)? How have their views changed through the generations? Does the way our two traditions differ in their views of Nauvoo reflect different spiritual understandings as well? ANSWERING QUESTIONS NO LONGER ASKED NAUVOO, ITS MEANING AND INTERPRETATION IN THE RLDS CHURCH/COMMUNITY OF CHRIST By Mark A. Scherer COLLEAGUE OF MINE RECENTLY OBSERVED, Today’s Community of Christ does not take “official posi- “Only one church name is more difficult to say than tions” in matters of church history. Although this has not al- A ‘The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,’ and ways been the case, members (and their historians) are free that is ‘The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day from the strictures that confuse matters of faith with sound Saints.’”1 The similarity of the two names accurately suggests a historical methodology. Simply stated: “Our history is not our common historical origin, a similar priesthood, scriptural, and theology.” Thus, a member of the Community of Christ can administrative structure. And the Nauvoo, Illinois, experience is ask tough historical questions without fear of being considered pivotal to both movements. For the church headquartered in “weak in the faith.” Today, we believe our history informs us Salt Lake City, Utah, Nauvoo represents the crowning achieve- about our institutional and individual identity—where we ment of Latter Day Saintism; for the church headquartered in have been in the past, where we are at present, and where we Independence, Missouri, Nauvoo represents the movement’s are going in the future. -
Avraham Gileadi, the Book of Isaiah: a New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon
Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 4 Number 1 Article 46 1992 Avraham Gileadi, The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon Donald W. Parry Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Parry, Donald W. (1992) "Avraham Gileadi, The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 4 : No. 1 , Article 46. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol4/iss1/46 This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Title Author(s) Donald W. Parry Reference Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 4/1 (1992): 52–62. ISSN 1050-7930 (print), 2168-3719 (online) Abstract Review of The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon (1988), by Avraham Gileadi. Avraham Gileadi, The Book oj Isaiah: A New Translation with InterpretiYe Keys from the Book of Mormon. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1988. xviii + 250 pp., selected bibliography and index of terms. Hard cover $19.95, paperback $9.95. Reviewed by Donald W. Parry The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon contains a five-page foreword by Ellis T. -
Latter-Day Saint Kinship: the Salvific Power of the Family
Latter-Day Saint Kinship: The Salvific Power of the Family Louisa Fowler Honors Defense Date: May 6th, 2020 Thesis Advisor: Professor Christopher Vecsey Defense Committee: Professor Benjamin Stahlberg Professor Steven Kepnes Introduction Since its inception in 1830, the people of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Days have evoked reactions from the public, ranging from confusion to outrage. In turn, the Church community has struggled to fit into secular society. The Church has constantly worked to craft and improve its relationship with the world. Recently, in 2018, Latter-Day Saint President Russell M. Nelson explained that the “Lord has impressed upon [his] mind the importance of the name he has revealed for the Church.”1 Latter-Day Saints reject the title ‘Mormons,’ asking outsiders to refer to members of the Church as Latter-Day Saints. Non-members of the Church misunderstand the Latter-Day Saint community, right down to its name. For the last two centuries, the Church community has been mysterious and confusing to the ‘outside world.’ What exactly do the Latter-Day Saints believe? Why do they behave the way that they do? Why do they seem so ‘other’, in relation to the greater society in which they live? This thesis will utilize the lens of the Latter-Day social structure-- from family life to marital expectations, to dating guidelines-- in order to demonstrate that this religion is unique due to its view of the family as sacred. An understanding of Latter-Day Saints’ family life is the key to understanding their Church because Latter-Day Saint religion is deeply relational, embedded in gender, marriage, and the family. -
Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: an Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University
BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONTRIBUTIONS NO. Sources of Mormon History in Illinois, 1839-48: An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University Compiled by STANLEY B. KIMBALL 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 The Library SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY Carbondale—Edwardsville Bibliographic Contributions No. 1 SOURCES OF MORMON HISTORY IN ILLINOIS, 1839-48 An Annotated Catalog of the Microfilm Collection at Southern Illinois University 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, 1966 Compiled by Stanley B. Kimball Central Publications Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Illinois ©2014 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville 2nd edition, revised and enlarged, May, 1966 FOREWORD In the course of developing a book and manuscript collection and in providing reference service to students and faculty, a univeristy library frequently prepares special bibliographies, some of which may prove to be of more than local interest. The Bibliographic Contributions series, of which this is the first number, has been created as a means of sharing the results of such biblio graphic efforts with our colleagues in other universities. The contribu tions to this series will appear at irregular intervals, will vary widely in subject matter and in comprehensiveness, and will not necessarily follow a uniform bibliographic format. Because many of the contributions will be by-products of more extensive research or will be of a tentative nature, the series is presented in this format. Comments, additions, and corrections will be welcomed by the compilers. The author of the initial contribution in the series is Associate Professor of History of Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, Illinois. He has been engaged in research on the Nauvoo period of the Mormon Church since he came to the university in 1959 and has published numerous articles on this subject. -
C. a Chronological List of Pertinent Writings on Bible Quotations and Language Uses That Are Part of the Book of Mormon
C. A Chronological List of Pertinent Writings on Bible Quotations and Language Uses That Are Part of the Book of Mormon In his well-researched book, Mormons and the Bible, Harvard-trained Philip L. Barlow, a noted scholar on American religious history, writes the following: The Bible’s broad influence in America from the time of the initial English settlements seems intuitively obvious . the scriptures were prominent from the first (see Hath and Noll, eds., The Bible in America). .l . In 1816, a national organization had formed in order to—as its constitution put it— “claim our place in the age of Bibles.” In less than four years the American Bible Society had distributed nearly one hundred thousand copies of the Holy Book. (see Whitney R. Cross, The Burned- Over District: The Social and Intellectual History of Enthusiastic Religion in Western New York, 1800-1850, p. 127) After some further discussion Barlow writes: All their lives the Smiths were a Bible-believing family in a Bible-believing culture. Into such a family, at the turn of the nineteenth century, Joseph Smith Jr., the future Mormon prophet, was born. He produced more scripture—scripture that at once challenged yet reinforced biblical authority, and that echoed biblical themes, interpreted biblical passages, shared biblical content, corrected biblical errors, filled biblical gaps, was built with biblical language, and restored biblical methods, namely the prophetic process itself. (Source: Philip L. Barlow, Mormons and the Bible: The Place of the Latter-day Saints in American Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 3-5, 10-12.) In view of such conditions, it was not surprising that from the very beginning, questions arose as to the biblical content of the Book of Mormon. -
A Photographic History of the Temple Lot in Independence, Jackson County, Missouri
Addams and Baugh: Photographic History of the Temple Lot 31 “Upon a Lot . Not Far From the Courthouse”: A Photographic History of the Temple Lot in Independence, Jackson County, Missouri R. Jean Addams and Alexander L. Baugh Among the diverse expressions of the Latter Day Saint movement, the Church of Christ (Temple Lot) or “Hedrickites” (as members of their church have been called historically) is unique in its early claim to a specific revela- tion to return “as a church” to Jackson County, Missouri, and to redeem or reclaim the “temple lot” in the “center place” of Zion. Soon after the organization of the Church founded by Joseph Smith Jr. in Fayette, New York, on April 6, 1830, the first missionaries were sent by Smith to Missouri (see D&C 28:8–9; 30:5–8; 32:1–5).1 The following year, Smith and some of his closest advisors left Kirtland, Ohio (where the Church had relocated in 1831), and traveled to Independence, Jackson County, Mis- souri. Shortly after Joseph Smith’s arrival in the early summer of 1831, he announced, by revelation, the Lord’s intention to make Independence, Jack- son County, Missouri, the chosen place for the gathering of the Saints (D&C 57:1–4). In the revelation, the town of Independence (in Jackson County), R. JE A N Adda MS ([email protected])is an independent researcher living in Woodin- ville, Washington. He received his BS and MBA from the University of Utah. He is also a member of the Mormon History Association and the John Whitmer Historical Associa- tion. -
<Em>The Book of Isaiah: a New Translation
BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 28 Issue 3 Article 15 7-1-1988 The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon Avraham Gileadi Royal Skousen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Skousen, Royal (1988) "The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys from the Book of Mormon Avraham Gileadi," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 28 : Iss. 3 , Article 15. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol28/iss3/15 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Skousen: <em>The Book of Isaiah: A New Translation with Interpretive Keys 124 BYU studies AVRAHAM GILEADI the book of isaiah A new translation with interpretive keysfromkeys from the book of mormon salt lake city deseret book co 1988 xviii 250 appp 1995199519.95 reviewed by royal skousen professor ofenglish at brigham young university this book is an important milestone in LDS scriptural study for the first time a latter day saint scholar has fully recognized the inadequacy of the outdated and archaic 1611 king james trans lation and has produced a completely new translation of a biblical book from an LDS point of view As modem readers we are familiar with the king james language of the new testament gospels but other parts especially the -
Twelve Diatribes of Modern Israel
Twelve Diatribes of Modern Israel Avraham Gileadi This essay serves as a testimony to modern Israel—the Latter-day Saints—that we are beginning to resemble God’s ancient covenant people in ways that conict with our high ideals. Some parallels between the two peoples provide a yardstick by which we can judge ourselves. Unfortunately, these parallels paint a dismal picture of where we are headed and what is in store. If the type or pattern we draw from the parallels holds true,1 then by following the parallels through to their conclusion we will know what to expect in our generation. Next to actual prophecy, scriptural types provide the most reliable guide to the future, particularly to the last days. Indeed, all true prophets prophesy, more or less, using types and shadows from Israel’s ancient past to predict the future. By familiarizing ourselves with the ancient types, we will know both a sickness and its cure; we will recognize our present condition and know what its outcome must be. Because biblical parallels do not directly threaten us, we could keep ourselves aloof from their message. Such aloofness, I would point out, is out of character with the man whom I salute in this essay: Hugh Nibley exemplies one who comes to terms with hidden errors, who searches out the truth, who speaks the unspeakable. He frankly criticizes the Saints, warning and admonishing as well as teaching and instructing them. He serves as a perfect example of the Lord sending “prophets, and wise men, and scribes” to his people (Matthew 23:34; emphasis added). -
Questions and Answers About the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L
Questions and Answers about the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L. West At a certain place in Independence, Missouri, a rectangle of land is surrounded by an amphitheater, a visitors’ center, a peace plaza, a mission office, hundreds of parking spaces, three meetinghouses for congrega- tional worship, and the headquarters for an internation- al church. The rectangle measures about 300 feet by 200 feet (90 meters by 60 meters). It has nothing on it but grass, a few trees, six small stone markers, and a sign. Com- pared to nearby structures, it doesn’t look like much. But it is one reason those structures are there. Joseph expressed their hope: “When will the wilderness The buildings are operated by three churches: The blossom as the rose; when will Zion be built up in her Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Church glory, and where will thy Temple stand unto which all of Christ, and Community of Christ. Members of all nations shall come in the last days?”1 three churches—and other churches in the area—feel a On July 20, 1831, the Lord revealed His answer to special attachment to that little rectangle of land. They Joseph: believe it was once dedicated for the construction of a “Hearken, O ye elders of my church, saith the Lord temple in the center place of Zion, in preparation for your God, who have assembled yourselves together, ac- the Savior’s millennial reign. cording to my commandments, in this land, which is Every year, thousands of Latter-day Saints go to the land of Missouri, which is the land which I have ap- the visitors’ center in Independence. -
60 F1 937, Federal Reporter
REORGANIZED CHURCH JESUS CHRIST L. D. S. V. CHURCH OF CHRIST. 937 104, by Judge Jackson (now one of the justices of the supreme court), in whose opinion the earlier cases are sufficiently referred to. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed. REORGANIZED CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. CHURCH OF CHRIST et aI. (Circuit Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D. March 3, 1894.) 1. RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATIONS-TITLE TO LAND-INCORPORATION. The general conference of a religious association directed that articles of incorporation be drawn up and filed in accordance with the laws of the state, and one of these provided that all property held In trust for the church should vest in the corporation, to whom the trustees were directed to transfer it, and that the corporation might sue for and recover the same. Held, that this ~onstituted a valid transfer of the equitable Interest of the members of the association to the corporation, and authorized the corpora- tion to maintain suits'relating to former church property in its own name. B. SAME-FoREIGN CORPORATIONS. Const. Mo. art. 2, § 8, :vrovides that "no religious corporation can be es- tablished in this state, except such as may be created under a general law, for the purpose only of holding title to such real estate as may be pre- scribed by law for church edifices, parsonages and cemeteries." Held, that this does not prohibit a foreign religious corporation from holding land in Missouri for the purposes specified. 8. SAME-COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS. The question whether a foreign religious corporation has attempted to acquire more land than It is allowed to hold (Rev. -
A History of the Rise of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in Missouri
A History of the Rise of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Missouri Written and Compiled by: Hal Pierce Anyone with historical information about the rise of the Church is invited to share that information by sending it to this website and it will be added. Thanks. 1 Sources: “Church Almanac”; Doctrine and Covenants; “The History of the Church”, B. H. Roberts, Deseret Book Co., 1964; Joseph Smith, Rough Stone Rolling by Richard Lyman Bushman, Alfred A. Knopf, 2005; Wilford Woodruff, Bookcraft: 1964; The Life and Times of Wilford Woodruff, A Mormon Prophet, Signature Books; “Polygamy on the Pedernales” by Melvin C. Johnson, Utah State University Press 2006; Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, Deseret Book Company, 1985; LDS Church News; “The Best of the St. Louis Luminary” Edited by Susan Easton Black. Note: Much has been written about Church history in Missouri and it is not the intent here to repeat what is known, but to assimilate significant events in easily readable chronology related to the efforts of taking the gospel into this important area of the United States. At the first Church Conference on 26 September 1830 Oliver Cowdery was called to begin the Church’s first mission west of New York State which would include seeking out the New Jerusalem location in Missouri, and to teach the Indians in the area about the Book of Mormon. Oliver Cowdery would lead a group with Peter Whitmer Jr., Parley P. Pratt, and Ziba Peterson also going. Frederick G. Williams joined the group as they passed through Ohio. -
Forging the Mormon Myth Maryanne Hafen Oglethorpe University, [email protected]
Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 4 August 2016 Forging the Mormon Myth MaryAnne Hafen Oglethorpe University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur Part of the History of Religion Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Hafen, MaryAnne (2016) "Forging the Mormon Myth," Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 6 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ojur/vol6/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hafen: Forging the Mormon Myth Forging the Mormon Myth MaryAnne Hafen Senior Honors Thesis April 24, 2016 Published by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University, 2016 1 1 Oglethorpe Journal of Undergraduate Research, Vol. 6 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 4 Under the pretense of rare document collecting Mark Hofmann sold hundreds of forged documents to the Mormon Church and other private collectors for hundreds of thousands of dollars. His documents not only fooled worldclass collectors and authenticators, they fit neatly into Mormon history. Though much of the information presented in them was falsified, his convincing handwriting, inclusion of meticulously researched historical minutiae, and ability to capture the voice of early Church members ensured that no one could believe they were fakes. A handful of key forgeries raised suspicions about Mormon origins and the historical tradition in which they had been retold earlier in the twentieth century.