Questions and Answers About the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Questions and Answers About the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L Questions and Answers about the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L. West At a certain place in Independence, Missouri, a rectangle of land is surrounded by an amphitheater, a visitors’ center, a peace plaza, a mission office, hundreds of parking spaces, three meetinghouses for congrega- tional worship, and the headquarters for an internation- al church. The rectangle measures about 300 feet by 200 feet (90 meters by 60 meters). It has nothing on it but grass, a few trees, six small stone markers, and a sign. Com- pared to nearby structures, it doesn’t look like much. But it is one reason those structures are there. Joseph expressed their hope: “When will the wilderness The buildings are operated by three churches: The blossom as the rose; when will Zion be built up in her Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the Church glory, and where will thy Temple stand unto which all of Christ, and Community of Christ. Members of all nations shall come in the last days?”1 three churches—and other churches in the area—feel a On July 20, 1831, the Lord revealed His answer to special attachment to that little rectangle of land. They Joseph: believe it was once dedicated for the construction of a “Hearken, O ye elders of my church, saith the Lord temple in the center place of Zion, in preparation for your God, who have assembled yourselves together, ac- the Savior’s millennial reign. cording to my commandments, in this land, which is Every year, thousands of Latter-day Saints go to the land of Missouri, which is the land which I have ap- the visitors’ center in Independence. Many of them ask pointed and consecrated for the gathering of the saints. about the temple lot. This brief article answers some of “Wherefore, this is the land of promise, and the their questions. place for the city of Zion. “And thus saith the Lord your God, if you will re- Where is the temple lot? ceive wisdom here is wisdom. Behold, the place which is now called Independence is the center place; and a The temple lot is in the western portion of the city of spot for the temple is lying westward, upon a lot which Independence. It is one of the highest points in the area, is not far from the courthouse” (D&C 57:1–3). overlooking the metropolis of Kansas City, Missouri, When the Lord revealed the location of the lot, the about 9 miles (14 kilometers) to the west. People who land was west of the city of Independence. Since then, visit the Independence Visitors’ Center can see the lot the city has expanded to include the temple lot. The when they exit through the front doors. It lies immedi- courthouse mentioned in this revelation no longer ex- ately to the northwest. ists. It was replaced in 1836 by the building now known On January 2, 1831, several months before revealing as the Truman Courthouse. the location for the temple, the Lord said that He would give His people “a land of promise.” He declared, “I will When was the land dedicated as a temple lot? give it unto you for the land of your inheritance, if you Who pronounced the dedication? seek it with all your hearts. And this shall be my cove- nant with you” (D&C 38:18–20). On June 6, 1831, the John Whitmer wrote that on August 3, 1831, eight Lord commanded Joseph Smith and others to preach elders “assembled together where the temple [was] to the gospel in the state of Missouri and to prepare for be erected.” Those eight elders were the Prophet Joseph a conference there. He promised that if they would Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Sidney Rigdon, Peter Whitmer be faithful, “the land of [their] inheritance” would “be Jr., Frederick G. Williams, William W. Phelps, Martin made known unto them” (D&C 52:5). Harris, and Joseph Coe. John Whitmer recorded: “Sid- As Joseph and his fellow servants journeyed in Mis- ney Rigdon dedicated the ground where the city is to souri, they were anxious to learn of this promised land. stand, and Joseph Smith Jr. laid a stone at the northeast 1 Questions and Answers about the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L. West es.6 The plat called for a square mile of land—more than 10 times the amount of property Bishop Partridge had purchased. Sidney Rigdon dedicated the ground where the city is to stand, and Joseph Smith Jr. laid a stone at the northeast corner of the contemplated temple in the name of the Lord Jesus of Nazareth. corner of the contemplated temple in the name of the Lord Jesus of Nazareth. After all present had rendered thanks to the great ruler of the universe, Sidney Rigdon pronounced this spot of ground wholly dedicated unto Original plat of the city of Zion. the Lord forever.”2 The plat included a brief explanation of the 24 tem- On this same day, the Church claimed the site so ples. They were to correspond to quorums and func- they could purchase it someday.3 The United States gov- tions of the priesthood. Twelve of them corresponded ernment did not make the land available for purchase to the Melchizedek Priesthood, and the other twelve until December 1831, and Jones H. and Clara Flournoy corresponded to the Aaronic Priesthood.7 bought it.4 The plat did not specifically explain the kinds of ac- When did the Saints acquire the temple lot? tivities that would take place inside the temples. How- ever, the Saints’ use of the Kirtland Temple from 1836 to On December 19, 1831, Bishop Edward Partridge 1838 suggests that the temples in Independence would purchased 63.27 acres from the Flournoys.5 That land have been used for worship, teaching and learning, included the area that had been dedicated for a temple. priesthood ordinances and blessings, Church adminis- What did the early Saints plan to do with the temple lot? tration, and community functions. Each temple was to bear the inscription “Holiness to the Lord.”8 As the Lord continued to reveal His will to Joseph In August 1833, the First Presidency prepared a re- Smith, the Saints came to understand that the temple vised plat for the city of Zion and a revised plan for the lot and the land surrounding it were to be used for more temple that was to be built first. The plan for the tem- than one sacred building. ple included the following explanation, written by Oli- In June 1833, the Prophet Joseph and his counselors ver Cowdery: “Those patterns previously sent you, per in the First Presidency prepared a plat for the city of mail, by our brethren, were incorrect in some respects, Zion—a plan for the layout of the city. President Freder- being drawn in great haste. They have therefore drawn ick G. Williams drew the plat, which called for bishops’ these, which are correct. The form of the city was also storehouses and 24 temples in the center of the city, sur- incorrect, being drawn in haste. We send you another.”9 rounded by blocks divided into property for residenc- 2 Questions and Answers about the Temple Lot in Independence, Missouri Aaron L. West faith, and consecrated service. They followed this pat- tern in other settlements, such as Far West, Missouri; Nauvoo, Illinois; and Salt Lake City, Utah. Who owns the temple lot today? Community of Christ owns most of the 63.27 acres purchased by Bishop Partridge. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints owns the next-largest por- tion. The smallest portion of the land—including the spot dedicated for a temple—is owned by the Church of Christ, once known as the Church of Christ (Temple Lot). This church was founded by Granville Hedrick, a former Latter-day Saint who chose not to go to the Salt Lake Valley when the Saints left Nauvoo, Illinois. Granville Hedrick and his followers returned to Inde- pendence in 1867. Revised plat of the city of Zion. The revised plat called for a larger city—one and one-half square miles—with more lots for residents. It no longer featured storehouses in the city’s center, leav- ing only temples in that part of the city. It also shift- ed the temple blocks in their orientation, from north– south to east–west. Both versions called for one certain temple to be built first. This temple was to be a “house of the Lord for the [First] Presidency.”10 In the first version, that temple was labeled with the number 5 and then with an X. In both versions, it was to be built on the spot now referred to as the temple lot. In the final plan, it was “to What buildings are near the temple lot today? be 97 feet long, and 61 feet wide [about 30 meters long and 19 meters wide] within the walls.”11 As shown in this photograph, the building closest Although the two versions differed from each other to the lot is a meetinghouse owned by the Church of in significant ways, their focus was essentially the same. Christ. Other nearby buildings are owned by Commu- Both centered on sacred buildings in the heart of a cov- nity of Christ and The Church of Jesus Christ of Lat- enant community. Both were patterns to be followed in ter-day Saints. stakes of Zion as the Church continued to grow. Why is the temple lot significant today? Did the Saints build any of those temples? To answer this question, we return to words of rev- Soon after the Lord revealed plans for the city of elation.
Recommended publications
  • Joseph Smith and the United Firm: the Growth and Decline of the Church's First Master Plan of Business and Finance, Ohio and Missouri, 1832-1834
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 46 Issue 3 Article 1 7-1-2007 Joseph Smith and the United Firm: The Growth and Decline of the Church's First Master Plan of Business and Finance, Ohio and Missouri, 1832-1834 Max H. Parkin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Parkin, Max H. (2007) "Joseph Smith and the United Firm: The Growth and Decline of the Church's First Master Plan of Business and Finance, Ohio and Missouri, 1832-1834," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 46 : Iss. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol46/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Parkin: Joseph Smith and the United Firm: The Growth and Decline of the C Joseph Smith and the United Firm The Growth and Decline of the Church’s First Master Plan of Business and Finance, Ohio and Missouri, 1832–1834 Max H Parkin year after Joseph Smith organized the Church, the young prophet A began to gather about him a management team that helped direct the Church’s early business affairs. These officers assisted him before the principal quorums of Church leadership were formed or fully developed. This growing board of managers printed the first collection of Joseph Smith’s revelations; planned for the new city of Zion and its temples, as it did for Kirtland; operated the Lord’s storehouses; and fostered other com- mercial interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Placing the Cardston Temple in Early Mormon Temple Architectural History
    PLACING THE CARDSTON TEMPLE IN EARLY MORMON TEMPLE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY By Amanda Buessecker A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Degree in Art History Carleton University May 2020 Supervisor: Peter Coffman, Ph.D. Carleton University ii Abstract: The Cardston temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints represents a drastic shift in temple architecture of the early Mormon faith. The modern granite structure was designed not to show a mere difference of aesthetic taste, but as an embodiment of the evolving relationship between the Mormon pioneers and the American government. Earlier temples, erected in the nineteenth century throughout the valleys of Utah, were constructed by Mormon pioneers at a time when the religious group desired to separate themselves from the United States physically, politically, and architecturally. When the temple was built in Cardston, Alberta (1913-1923), it was a radical departure from its medievalist predecessors in Utah. The selected proposal was a modern Prairie-school style building, a manifestation of Utah’s recent interest in integrating into American society shortly after being admitted to the Union as a state in 1896. iii Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Part I: A Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 5 A Background for Semiotics .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hartford Connecticut Temple Fact Sheet
    Temple Facts | The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Hartford Connecticut Temple Fact Sheet The Hartford Connecticut Temple will be the 155th operating temple of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints worldwide and the first in Con- necticut. It will serve nearly 27,000 Church mem- bers in Connecticut, western Rhode Island, western Massachusetts and eastern New York. Exterior Features LOCATION: 2 Central Way, Farmington, CT 06032 BUILDING: The design of the temple reflects PLANS ANNOUNCED: the building style of New England and traditional October 2, 2010 American Georgian architecture. The exterior GROUNDBREAKING: August 17, 2013 is overlaid with approximately 9,500 separate PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE: pieces of granite cladding quarried in China. September 30–October 22, 2016 (except The roof materials on sloping surfaces are slate October 1, 2, 9 and 16) with stainless steel flashings and copper rain CULTURAL CELEBRATION: gutter systems. November 19, 2016 STEEPLE AND SPIRE: The graceful steeple is DEDICATION: November 20, 2016 evocative of Farmington’s First Church of Christ PROPERTY SIZE: 11.3 acres Congregational, a landmark designed in 1772 by master builder Judah Woodruff, who was the BUILDING SIZE: 32,246 square feet great-uncle of LDS Church president Wilford BUILDING HEIGHT: 117 feet, 2 inches, Woodruff. President Woodruff was born in including the statue of the Book of Farmington (now Avon) in 1807. Mormon prophet Moroni ARCHITECT: EXTERIOR ART GLASS: The art glass’s understat- David Rees from FFKR ed design incorporates the look of historic di- Architects of Salt Lake City, Utah vided light fixtures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geographical Analysis of Mormon Temple Sites in Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1992 The Geographical Analysis of Mormon Temple Sites in Utah Garth R. Liston Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Geography Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Liston, Garth R., "The Geographical Analysis of Mormon Temple Sites in Utah" (1992). Theses and Dissertations. 4881. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4881 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 3 the geographicalgeograp c ananalysisysls 0off mormormonon tetempletempiepie slsitessltestes in utah A thesis presented to the department of geography brigham young university in partial fulfillment of the requiaequirequirementsrementscements for the degree master of science by garth R listenliston december 1992 this thesis by garth R liston is accepted in its present form by the department of geography of brigham young university as satisfying the thesis requirement for the degree of master of science f c- H L ricirichardard H jackson 1 committeeoommittee chair alan H grey committecommifctemeflermeymere er i w i ige-e&e date laieialeidleaaleig- J 6tevstevtpvnstldepartmentni d- epartmentepartment chair n dedication0 0 this thesis is dedicated to my wonderful mother
    [Show full text]
  • From Tent to Temple by Eugene Pease, 1959 and Earlier U
    The 120-Year Story of University Temple United Methodist Church (1890–2010) University Temple United Methodist Church 1415 NE 43rd Street Seattle, Washington 98105 Contents Foreword ................................................................................................................ i Preface .................................................................................................................. iv 1. How Firm a Foundation ............................................. 1 Methodism on Seattle's Northern Frontier (1) A Growing Congregation's Ambitious Plans (4) “I Will Build My Church” (5) A Walk Through God’s House (8) The Sanctuary Stained Glass Windows (13) A Block-Long Methodist Presence (16) The Education Wing Sander Memorial Chapel The Church Library Where The Money Came From (23) A Brief Financial History The Crisis of 1935 The Memorial and Endowment Funds 2. The Pastors and Staff .................................................. 30 The Preaching Ministry (30) The Music Ministry (57) Religious Education (73) The Church Office (75) 3. The Congregation .......................................................... 79 United Methodist Women (80) A Brief History The Christmas Gift Banquet The Quilting Group The Sewing Group Wesleyan Service Guild/Jennie Fulton Guild Susannah Wesleyan Service Guild Christian Social Relations Fellowship and Service Groups (93) Triple F and Supper Club Young Adult Beacon Club Meriweds/In-Betweeners Temple Two’s/The Collection Methodist Men Organization Temple Men: The Working Methodists
    [Show full text]
  • 28-32 a Scherer Nauvoo from Coc Perspective.Qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28
    28-32_a_scherer_nauvoo from coc perspective.qxd 6/21/02 7:37 AM Page 28 SUNSTONE What does Nauvoo mean today to members of the Community of Christ (formerly RLDS Church)? How have their views changed through the generations? Does the way our two traditions differ in their views of Nauvoo reflect different spiritual understandings as well? ANSWERING QUESTIONS NO LONGER ASKED NAUVOO, ITS MEANING AND INTERPRETATION IN THE RLDS CHURCH/COMMUNITY OF CHRIST By Mark A. Scherer COLLEAGUE OF MINE RECENTLY OBSERVED, Today’s Community of Christ does not take “official posi- “Only one church name is more difficult to say than tions” in matters of church history. Although this has not al- A ‘The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,’ and ways been the case, members (and their historians) are free that is ‘The Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day from the strictures that confuse matters of faith with sound Saints.’”1 The similarity of the two names accurately suggests a historical methodology. Simply stated: “Our history is not our common historical origin, a similar priesthood, scriptural, and theology.” Thus, a member of the Community of Christ can administrative structure. And the Nauvoo, Illinois, experience is ask tough historical questions without fear of being considered pivotal to both movements. For the church headquartered in “weak in the faith.” Today, we believe our history informs us Salt Lake City, Utah, Nauvoo represents the crowning achieve- about our institutional and individual identity—where we ment of Latter Day Saintism; for the church headquartered in have been in the past, where we are at present, and where we Independence, Missouri, Nauvoo represents the movement’s are going in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • William Smith, 1811-93: Problematic Patriarch Irene M
    ARTICLES AND ESSAYS William Smith, 1811-93: Problematic Patriarch Irene M. Bates WILLIAM SMITH, YOUNGER BROTHER of the prophet Joseph Smith, has been easy to dismiss but difficult to deal with. More often than not, he has been described with adjectives like violent, wicked, unstable, and licentious. Yet intriguing references suggest that a more balanced view of this complex man might be appropriate. The Prophet described his brother in a blessing 18 December 1833 this way: "Brother William is as the fierce lion which divideth not the spoil because of his strength." x Then on 9 December 1842, William defended the Nauvoo Charter with uncommon eloquence as representative for Hancock County in the Illinois legislature.2 In August 1845, W. W. Phelps designated William "the Patriarchal Jacob's Staff." 3 And B. H. Roberts, impressed with the seventy-year-old William in 1881, said he had "so vindicated the claims and the character of his brother that ever afterward whenever the question of Joseph Smith came up, people would say 'He had just as good a right to be a prophet as any man mentioned in the Bible.' " 4 William Smith was born at Royal t o n , Vermont, 13 March 1811, the fifth son of Joseph, Sr., and Lucy Mack Smith. He was baptized by David Whitmer 9 June 1830 and was ordained an apostle 15 February 1835, before he was twenty-four years old. He married Caroline Amanda Grant, the sister of IRENE M. Bates, who joined the Church in England in 1955 and moved to the United States with her husband, William, and four children in 1967, is a 1975 graduate of UCLA.
    [Show full text]
  • 109.1 Comments on Doctrine & Covenants 109 This Section Is the Kirtland Temple Dedication Prayer. the Text Draws Heavily On
    Comments on Doctrine & Covenants 109 This section is the Kirtland Temple dedication prayer. The text draws heavily on the rhetorical style of Psalms and also employs the theme of Mosaic intercession. In the preceding sections, there are numerous rebukes by the Lord aimed at the Missouri ecclesia for failing to be zealous in keeping the commandments in general, and for failing to build the Missouri Temple in specific (cf. D&C 101, 103). Here in the prayer, Smith is importuning the Lord using a style that draws on the classical Psalmist’s appeal. The Psalmist’s appeal characterizes the one doing the appealing as being unworthy of the Lord’s mercy, yet still pleading for it. The Psalmist then gives the Lord justification for his appeal. Relatively common among the Psalms, good examples of this are Ps. 6:4-5, and Ps. 30:8-9, as follows: Return, O LORD, deliver my soul: oh save me for thy mercies’ sake. For in death there is no remembrance of thee: in the grave who shall give thee thanks? I cried to thee, O LORD; and unto the LORD I made supplication. What profit is there in my blood, when I go down to the pit? Shall the dust praise thee? shall it declare thy truth? In both examples, the Psalmist makes an appeal on his own behalf and justifies the appeal by saying if the Lord lets him perish then he cannot praise Him from hell. Psalm 30:10-12 goes on to state: Hear, O LORD, and have mercy upon me: LORD, be thou my helper.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2005 New
    THE MAY 2005 SPECIAL ISSUE: THE TIMES AND SEASONS OF JOSEPH SMITH The New Era Magazine oseph Volume 35, Number 5 oseph May 2005 Smith . Official monthly publication J Jhas done for youth of The Church of Jesus Christ more, save of Latter-day Saints Jesus only, for The New Era can be found the salvation in the Gospel Library at www.lds.org. of men in this world, than Editorial Offices: any other man New Era any other man 50 E. North Temple St. that ever lived Rm. 2420 Salt Lake City, UT in it” (D&C 84150-3220, USA 135:3). E-mail address: cur-editorial-newera In this @ldschurch.org special issue, Please e-mail or send stories, articles, photos, poems, and visit the ideas to the address above. Unsolicited material is wel- places where come. For return, include a the Prophet self-addressed, stamped the Prophet envelope. Joseph Smith To Subscribe: lived, and feel By phone: Call 1-800-537- 5971 to order using Visa, the spirit of MasterCard, Discover Card, or American Express. Online: all he Go to www.ldscatalog.com. By mail: Send $8 U.S. accomplished check or money order to Distribution Services, as the first P.O. Box 26368, Salt Lake City, UT President of 84126-0368, USA. The Church of To change address: Jesus Christ of Send old and new address information to Distribution Latter-day Services at the address above. Please allow 60 days Saints. for changes to take effect. Cover: Young Joseph Smith begins the great work of the Restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • NAUVOO's TEMPLE It Was Announced August 31, 1840, That A
    NAUVOO’S TEMPLE Dean E. Garner—Institute Director, Denton, Texas t was announced August 31, 1840, that a temple would be built, and Iarchitectural plans began to come in. Joseph Smith “advertised for plans for the temple,” William Weeks said, “and several architects presented their plans. But none seemed to suit Smith. When [William] presented his plans, Joseph Smith grabbed him, hugged him and said, ‘You are the man I want.’”1 Thus William was made superintendent of temple construction. All his work was cleared by the temple building committee. Those on the committee were Reynolds Cahoon, Elias Higbee, and Alpheus Cutler.2 Joseph Smith had the final say pertaining to the details of the temple, for he had seen the temple in vision, which enabled him to make decisions on the temple’s appearance.3 During the October Conference of 1840, the building of the Nauvoo During the temple was voted on and accepted by the saints. The temple was to be October Conference constructed of stone. Many weeks preceding the conference, a survey of Nauvoo’s main street verified that the entire route was underlain with a of 1840, the building massive layer of limestone many feet thick, particularly so in the northern of the Nauvoo part of the community. That site was selected for the quarry, where quality white-gray Illinois limestone could be extracted for the construction of temple was voted the temple. The principal quarry from which the temple stone would on and accepted by come was opened within ten days of the conference. Work in the quarry began October 12, 1840, with Elisha Everett striking the first blow.4 the saints.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 1 1994 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (1994) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol20/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Table of Contents LETTERS vi ARTICLES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS • --Positivism or Subjectivism? Some Reflections on a Mormon Historical Dilemma Marvin S. Hill, 1 TANNER LECTURE • --Mormon and Methodist: Popular Religion in the Crucible of the Free Market Nathan O. Hatch, 24 • --The Windows of Heaven Revisited: The 1899 Tithing Reformation E. Jay Bell, 45 • --Plurality, Patriarchy, and the Priestess: Zina D. H. Young's Nauvoo Marriages Martha Sonntag Bradley and Mary Brown Firmage Woodward, 84 • --Lords of Creation: Polygamy, the Abrahamic Household, and Mormon Patriarchy B. Cannon Hardy, 119 REVIEWS 153 --The Story of the Latter-day Saints by James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard Richard E. Bennett --Hero or Traitor: A Biographical Story of Charles Wesley Wandell by Marjorie Newton Richard L. Saunders --Mormon Redress Petition: Documents of the 1833-1838 Missouri Conflict edited by Clark V. Johnson Stephen C.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of LDS Temples by Year
    Number of LDS Temples by Year page 1 Year # of Temples New Temple Dedicated Date Dedicated Year # of Temples New Temple Dedicated Date Dedicated 2016 150 Provo City Center 20-Mar-16 2001 107 Columbia River Washington 18-Nov-01 2015 149 Tijuana Mexico 13-Dec-15 2001 106 Perth Australia 20-May-01 2015 148 Indianapolis Indiana 23-Aug-15 2001 105 Guadalajara Mexico 29-Apr-01 2015 147 Trujillo Peru 21-Jun-15 2001 104 Winter Quarters Nebraska 22-Apr-01 2015 146 Payson Utah 7-Jun-15 2001 103 Montevideo Uruguay 18-Mar-01 2015 145 Córdoba Argentina 17-May-15 2000 102 Porto Alegre Brazil 17-Dec-00 2014 144 Phoenix Arizona 16-Nov-14 2000 101 Recife Brazil 15-Dec-00 2014 143 Fort Lauderdale Florida 4-May-14 2000 100 Boston Massachusetts 1-Oct-00 2014 142 Gilbert Arizona 2-Mar-14 2000 99 Santo Domingo Dominican Republic 17-Sep-00 2013 141 Tegucigalpa Honduras 17-Mar-13 2000 98 Birmingham Alabama 3-Sep-00 2012 140 Calgary Alberta 28-Oct-12 2000 97 Houston Texas 26-Aug-00 2012 139 Brigham City Utah 23-Sep-12 2000 96 Caracas Venezuela 20-Aug-00 2012 138 Manaus Brazil 10-Jun-12 2000 95 Oklahoma City Oklahoma 30-Jul-00 2012 137 Kansas City Missouri 6-May-12 2000 94 Baton Rouge Louisiana 16-Jul-00 2011 136 Quetzaltenango Guatemala 11-Dec-11 2000 93 Veracruz Mexico 9-Jul-00 2011 135 San Salvador El Salvador 21-Aug-11 2000 92 Mérida Mexico 8-Jul-00 2010 134 Kyiv Ukraine 29-Aug-10 2000 91 Suva Fiji 18-Jun-00 2010 133 Cebu City Philippines 13-Jun-10 2000 90 Melbourne Australia 16-Jun-00 2010 132 The Gila Valley Arizona 23-May-10 2000 89 Adelaide Australia 15-Jun-00
    [Show full text]