DOCSLIB.ORG

Doing Business in Connecticut

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Doing Business in Connecticut HARTFORD Doing Business in Connecticut CityPlace I,185 Asylum Street Hartford, CT 06103 860.240.6000 NEW HAVEN One Century Tower 265 Church Street New Haven, CT 06510 Prepared by 203.772.7700 Murtha Cullina LLP STAMFORD 177 Broad Street July 2016 Stamford, CT 06901 203.653.5400 BOSTON 99 High Street Boston, MA 02110 617.457.4000 WOBURN 600 Unicorn Park Drive Woburn, MA 01801 781.933.5505 WHITE PLAINS 10 Bank Street, Suite 650 White Plains, NY 10606 914.682.2053 Barry J. Waters [email protected] | 203.772.7719 BOSTON | HARTFORD | NEW HAVEN | STAMFORD | WHITE PLAINS | WOBURN MURTHALAW.COM LEX MUNDI A LEGAL & BUSINESS GUIDE FOR DOING BUSINESS IN CONNECTICUT Prepared by: Marcel J. Bernier Jennifer A. Corvo Jennifer M. DelMonico Anthony P. Gangemi Scott M. Gerard Robert V. Giunta, Jr. Kenneth L. Levine David A. Menard Alfred E. Smith, Jr. Mark R. Sussman Keith S. Varian Barry J. Waters Edward B. Whittemore MURTHA CULLINA LLP Hartford, New Haven, and Stamford, Connecticut July 2016 The information contained in this Guide is for informational purposes only. The information in this Guide is not to be considered as legal advice or as a substitute for legal advice, and it is not intended to create, nor does it create, an attorney-client relationship. No responsibility will be accepted by the authors or publishers of this Guide for any inaccuracy, omission or statement contained herein which might prove to be misleading. Readers of this Guide should seek independent professional advice from an attorney authorized to practice in Connecticut before proceeding to conduct business in Connecticut. Copyright © 2016 Murtha Cullina LLP (All rights reserved) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 A. Introductory Note ..................................................................................... 1 B. Geographic Description .......................................................................... 1 C. Investment Climate .................................................................................. 1 D. Government and Politics. ........................................................................ 3 II. BUSINESS ENTITIES .......................................................................................... 5 A. Corporations ............................................................................................ 5 B. Connecticut Entity Transactions Act ................................................... 10 C. Partnerships ........................................................................................... 11 1. General Partnerships .................................................................. 11 2. Limited Liability Partnerships .................................................... 13 3. Limited Partnerships .................................................................. 14 D. Limited Liability Companies ................................................................. 18 E. Sole Proprietorship................................................................................ 22 F. Joint Venture .......................................................................................... 22 G. Non-Profit Corporations and Cooperatives ......................................... 22 H. Benefit Corporations. ............................................................................ 24 I. Alternative Methods of Doing Business in Connecticut .................... 25 1. Sales Representatives ................................................................ 25 2. Distributorships .......................................................................... 26 3. Licensing ..................................................................................... 26 4. Franchises ................................................................................... 26 J. Connecticut Uniform Securities Act..................................................... 27 1. General ......................................................................................... 27 2. Offer and Sale of Securities ....................................................... 27 3. Registration of Broker-Dealers, Investment Advisers and Agents .......................................................................................... 27 4. Regulation of Business Opportunity Investments ................... 28 i 5. Anti-fraud Provisions .................................................................. 28 6. Administration ............................................................................. 28 III. TRADE REGULATION ...................................................................................... 29 A. State Considerations ............................................................................. 29 1. Warranties ................................................................................... 29 2. Consumer Protection .................................................................. 29 3. Regulation of Franchises ........................................................... 30 4. State Antitrust Law ..................................................................... 31 IV. TAXATION ......................................................................................................... 32 A. State Taxation ........................................................................................ 32 1. Personal Income Tax .................................................................. 32 2. Corporation Business Tax ......................................................... 35 3. Property Tax ................................................................................ 38 4. Sales and Use Taxes ................................................................... 38 5. The Business Entity Tax ............................................................. 39 V. LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAWS ................................................................ 40 A. Discrimination ........................................................................................ 40 B. Leaves of Absence. ............................................................................... 42 C. Access to Records................................................................................. 45 D. Drug Testing. .......................................................................................... 46 E. Medical Marijuana. ................................................................................. 48 F. Workers’ Compensation ........................................................................ 49 G. Wage and Hour ...................................................................................... 49 H. Employment Applications/Inquiries About Criminal Records ........... 50 I. Other ...................................................................................................... 50 VI. ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ................................................................................... 54 A. Federal Considerations ......................................................................... 54 B. State Considerations ............................................................................. 54 ii VII. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ............................................................................ 59 A. IP Strategy and Management Counseling ........................................... 59 B. Patent Prosecution ................................................................................ 59 C. Patent Strategies and Opinions ............................................................ 60 D. Trademark, Copyright, and Advertising ............................................... 60 E. IP Transactions (Licensing/Purchase/Sale/Transfer) ......................... 60 F. Patent, Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secret Litigation ............... 61 G. Patent Post Grant Proceedings ............................................................ 62 H. State Considerations ............................................................................. 62 1. Trademarks and Service Marks ................................................. 62 2. Registration Procedure .............................................................. 63 3. Effects of Registration ................................................................ 63 4. Assignment.................................................................................. 64 5. Abandonment .............................................................................. 64 6. Common Law Rights .................................................................. 64 7. Collective and Certification Marks ............................................. 64 8. Trade Names................................................................................ 64 9. Trade Secrets .............................................................................. 64 10. Injunctive Relief ........................................................................... 65 11. Damages ...................................................................................... 65 12. Protection of Trade Secrets During Court Proceedings .......... 65 13. Misappropriation of Trade Secrets as Unfair Competition ...... 65 VIII. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ................................................................................... 66 A. Federal Court System ............................................................................ 66 1. Bankruptcy Cases ......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ron Degraw Transit Collection 2397
    Ron Degraw Transit Collection 2397 This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on September 14, 2021. Description is written in: English. Describing Archives: A Content Standard Manuscripts and Archives PO Box 3630 Wilmington, Delaware 19807 [email protected] URL: http://www.hagley.org/library Ron Degraw Transit Collection 2397 Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Biographical Note .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 5 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 6 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 SEPTA ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 14A.3-010 Entity Name
    14A.3-010 Entity name. (1) Except as authorized by subsection (24) of this section, the real name of an entity or foreign entity shall be distinguishable from any name of record with the Secretary of State. (2) The real name of a corporation or nonprofit corporation shall: (a) 1. End with the word "corporation," "company," or "limited" or the abbreviation "Corp.," "Inc.," "Co.," or "Ltd." or words or abbreviations of like import in another language, provided, however, that if a nonprofit corporation's name includes the word "company" or the abbreviation "Co.," it may not be immediately preceded by the word "and" or the abbreviation "&"; or 2. If a professional service corporation, shall end with the words "professional service corporation" or the abbreviation "P.S.C."; and (b) Shall not contain language stating or implying that the corporation is organized for a purpose other than that permitted by its organic act and its articles of incorporation. (3) The real name of a limited liability company shall end with the phrase "limited liability company" or "limited company" or the abbreviation "LLC" or "LC," provided, however, if the company is a professional limited liability company the name shall end with the phrase "professional limited liability company" or "professional limited company" or the abbreviation "PLLC" or "PLC." In the name of either a limited liability company or a professional limited liability company, the word "limited" may be abbreviated as "Ltd." and the word "Company" may be abbreviated as "Co." (4) The real name of a limited liability partnership registered pursuant to KRS 362.555 shall contain the phrase "Registered Limited Liability Partnership" or the abbreviation "LLP" as the last words or letters of its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative History for Connecticut Act
    Legislative History for Connecticut Act PA 16-97 HB5259 Senate 3081-3082, (3094-3096) 5 Judiciary 989-991, 1012-1020, 34 1046-1048, 1095-1113 House Transcripts have not been received. They are available 39 on CGA website, but are not the Official copy. Contact House Clerk for assistance (860) 240-0400 Transcripts from the Joint Standing Committee Public Hearing(s) and/or Senate and House of Representatives Proceedings Connecticut State Library Compiled 2017 S - 699 CONNECTICUT GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE PROCEEDINGS 2016 VOL. 59 PART 9 2751 – 3097 003081 /je 331 SENATE May 4, 2016 0 Thank you, Madam President. Will the Clerk now please call Calendar Page 27, Calendar 568, House Bill 5259. THE CHAIR: Mr. Clerk. THE CLERK: On page 27, Calendar 568, Substitute for House Bill Number 5259, AN ACT CONCERNING ADOPTION OF THE CONNECTICUT UNIFORM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT. THE CHAIR: Senator Coleman. SENATOR COLEMAN (2ND) : 0 Thank you very much, Madam President. I move acceptance of the Joint Committee's favorable report and passage of the bill in concurrence with the House. THE CHAIR: The motion is on acceptance and passage in concurrence. Will you remark, sir? SENATOR COLEMAN (2ND) : Madam President, this is a bill which makes some changes to the laws governing limited liability companies. Its rules generally apply when an LLC operating agreement does not cover a particular matter except for certain items that the bill does not allow in an agreement or that an agreement () 003082 /je 332 SENATE May 4, 2016 0 cannot change. I urge support and passage of the bill.
    [Show full text]
  • The LLC As Recombinant Entity: Revisiting Fundamental Questions Through the LLC Lens" (2009)
    Mitchell Hamline School of Law Mitchell Hamline Open Access Faculty Scholarship 2009 The LC as Recombinant Entity: Revisiting Fundamental Questions Through the LLC Lens Daniel S. Kleinberger Mitchell Hamline School of Law, [email protected] Publication Information 14 Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law 473 (2009) Repository Citation Kleinberger, Daniel S., "The LLC as Recombinant Entity: Revisiting Fundamental Questions Through the LLC Lens" (2009). Faculty Scholarship. Paper 221. http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/221 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The LC as Recombinant Entity: Revisiting Fundamental Questions Through the LLC Lens Abstract Rather than being a simple hybrid, the U.S. limited liability company is better described as a recombinant entity that combines attributes of four different types of business organizations. The LLC offers an almost ineffably flexible structure, but that flexibility does not place the LLC beyond the range of traditional, formalist analysis. To the contrary, parsing the LLC in pursuit of conventional forms may allow us "to know the place for the first time." This essay uses conventional concepts to: (i) explore whether "labels matter" when LLC membership interests are described as Contract or as Property; and (ii) examine how the plight of the "bare naked assignee" relates to the LLC's status as a legal person distinct from its members. Keywords limited liability company, L.L.C., limited liability partnership, L.L.P., business organizations Disciplines Organizations Law This article is available at Mitchell Hamline Open Access: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/facsch/221 THE LLC AS RECOMBINANT ENTITY: REVISITING FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS THROUGH THE LLC LENS Daniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Partnership Act (1997) Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001) Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) Uniform Limited Cooperative Association Act (2007)
    D R A F T FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Amendments to: UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT (1997) UNIFORM LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ACT (2001) UNIFORM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT (2006) UNIFORM LIMITED COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION ACT (2007) NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS FOR RECORD OWNERS OF BUSINESS ACT NOVEMBER 18, 2007 DRAFTING COMMITTEE MEETING Without Prefatory Notes and With Comments Copyright 82007 By NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS ____________________________________________________________________________________________ The ideas and conclusions set forth in this draft, including the proposed statutory language and any comments or reporter=s notes, have not been passed upon by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws or the Drafting Committee. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Conference and its Commissioners and the Drafting Committee and its Members and Reporter. Proposed statutory language may not be used to ascertain the intent or meaning of any promulgated final statutory proposal. November 5, 2007 DRAFTING COMMITTEE ON RECORD OWNERS OF BUSINESS ACT The Committee appointed by and representing the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in preparing this Act consists of the following individuals: HARRY J. HAYNSWORTH, IV, 2200 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th St., Minneapolis, MN 55402, Chair BRUCE A. COGGESHALL, One Monument Sq., POrtland, ME 04101 DAVID G. NIXON, 2340 Green Acres Rd., Suite 12, Fayetteville, AR 72703 STEVE WILBORN, 306 Tower Dr., Shelbyville, KY 40065 NORA WINKELMAN, Office of General Counsel, 333 Market St., 17th Flr., Harrisburg, PA 17101 WILLIAM H. CLARK, JR., One Logan Square, 18th and Cherry Streets, Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996, Reporter EX OFFICIO MARTHA LEE WALTERS, Oregon Supreme Court, 1163 State St., Salem, OR 97301-2563, President WILLIAM H.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Partnership Act (Upa) (1997) (Last Amended 2013)
    111 N. Wabash Ave. Suite 1010 Chicago, IL 60602 Uniform Law Commission (312) 450-6600 tel NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMMISSIONERS ON UNIFORM STATE LAWS (312) 450-6601 fax www.uniformlaws.org WHY YOUR STATE SHOULD ADOPT THE UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT (UPA) (1997) (LAST AMENDED 2013) The original Uniform Partnership Act was drafted in 1914 and enacted in every state except Louisiana. In 1997 it was completely revised. This revised version of the act is frequently referred to as the Revised Uniform Partnership Act. UPA (1997) was enacted in approximately three-fourths of the states. The 2011 and 2013 amendments to UPA (1997), approved as part of the Harmonization of Business Entity Acts project, expand the comprehensiveness of the act significantly, incorporate statutory and case law developments since its initial promulgation, and harmonize the language in the provisions that are similar to the other uniform and model unincorporated entity acts. It is the foundational unincorporated business entity statute. Every state should enact it. States that enacted UPA (1997) before the Harmonization project amendments should consider adopting UPA (1997), either as a stand-alone act or as Article 3 of the Uniform Business Organizations Code. The following list describes the more significant changes to UPA (1997), as amended: • Flexible Structure. UPA (1997) is a default statute for matters not covered by the partnership agreement. In general, the partnership agreement expressly controls over the statutory language in the act so that partners may tailor their management structure to meet their business needs. • Cohesive Entity. UPA (1997) defines a partnership explicitly as an entity, not an aggregate.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington's New LLC
    Washington’s New LLC Act This summary was prepared by Douglas L. Batey and Brian J. Todd, co-chairs of the Partnership and LLC Law Committee of the Business Law Section of the Washington State Bar Association I. BACKGROUND Washington first enacted its Limited Liability Company Act in 1994 (the “LLC Act”). The LLC Act has been amended piecemeal several times, and last year the LLC Act and the Business Corporation Act were significantly amended to authorize entity conversions. That change allowed conversions between Washington limited liability companies (“LLCs”), corporations, and limited partnerships, as well as allowing entities formed under the laws of another state to convert into Washington LLCs and corporations, and vice versa. LLCs have become the leading type of entity used for new business formations in Washington. For example, in 2014 there were 37,994 new LLCs formed in Washington, compared to 7,384 new business corporations. LLCs are used for a wide variety of types and sizes of businesses. LLCs may be formed in each of the 50 states, and LLCs formed in Washington may qualify to transact business in every state. The Partnership and LLC Law Committee of the WSBA’s Business Law Section (the “Committee”) began considering revisions to Washington’s LLC Act in 2008. After an initial review of the Uniform Law Commission’s Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (“RULLCA”), the Committee decided to focus on modernizing and improving Washington’s LLC Act instead of recommending the adoption of RULLCA. The Committee accordingly began in 2009 a detailed process of reviewing, revising and updating the LLC Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Ct Transit Bus Schedule East Haven
    Ct Transit Bus Schedule East Haven Is Joab incentive or tragic after anaerobiotic Marlow caroused so exuberantly? Shawn criminalize his maxima predominating soakingly or yeomanly after Tudor pitapat and retreads natively, tearing and moonish. Greggory is songless and cop scant as nonparous Robb skite indistinctly and waived ineffaceably. Registration is fast and free. Service hours are usually the same as the local bus route. Thank you for helping! Stamford, Bridgeport, and New Haven, located along the coastal highways from the New York border to New London, then northward up the Connecticut River to Hartford. Moving to smaller buses would not reduce these costs and would involve substantial capital costs for the new buses. When I was applying, I applied to six schools: two a uncertain, two solid, and two safeties. Easy to follow charts and graphs make viewing all your stats a breeze. Union Station Shuttle is. Search Bar for CT. Choose to make form fields required or optional, use field validation, and customize all system messages. Sherman Ave, location in Hamden. Get access to detailed information for all your visitors. On the other hand, just keeping or turning traffic signals green for buses may be doable. The western boundaries of Connecticut have been subject to change over time. Points of interest include: Chester center, Goodspeed Opera House, Saybrook Road medical complexes, Middlesex Hospital, Middlesex Courthouse and downtown Middletown. Here are some simple options that can help you reach your destination on time. Note: Holidays are not necessarily observed and service may not be different from the usual for the day.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Publications, National Agricultural Law Center
    A research project from The National Center for Agricultural Law Research and Information of the University of Arkansas • [email protected] • (479) 575-7646 • www.NationalAgLawCenter.org An Agricultural Law Research Article PART I: AN OVERVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND OWNERSHIP OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES by Carol R. Goforth The National Agricultural Law Center University of Arkansas School of Law 1 University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR 72701 July 2002 Part I: An Overview of Organizational and Ownership Options Available to Agricultural Enterprises Table of Contents A. Introduction ................................................................. 3 1. Scope of Article ........................................................ 3 2. Business and Tax Considerations .......................................... 4 3. Special Rules Applicable to Agricultural Operations ............................ 5 B. Sole Proprietorship ........................................................... 6 1. Business Law Status .................................................... 6 2. Tax Status ............................................................ 7 C. General Partnerships ......................................................... 7 1. Business Law Status .................................................... 7 a. The Different Uniform Partnership Acts ............................... 7 b. General Principles of Partnership Law ................................ 9 i. Formation and Nature of Business ............................. 9 ii. Liability of Owners
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Corporate Law: Is It "Broke"?
    Volume 100 Issue 1 Article 7 September 1997 West Virginia Corporate Law: Is It "Broke"? Debra R. Cohen West Virginia University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Debra R. Cohen, West Virginia Corporate Law: Is It "Broke"?, 100 W. Va. L. Rev. (1997). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol100/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cohen: West Virginia Corporate Law: Is It "Broke"? WEST VIRGINIA CORPORATE LAW: IS IT "BROKE"? DebraR. Cohen* I. INTRODUCTION ............................................ 5 II. THE CONTEXT ............................................. 7 A. Purpose of Business Entity Law ........................ 7 B. The Enabling Trend ................................. 13 C. Evolving Spectrum ofBusiness Entities .................. 15 III. BUSINESS ENTITY LAW IN WEST VIRGINIA ...................... 20 A. The Purpose of the Act ............................... 20 B. OtherBusiness Entity Law ............................ 23 IV. WHY THE ACT HAS STAGNATED .............................. 27 V. Is IT "BROKE"? .... ............................... 31 A. Structure of the Act ................................. 31 1. Organizational Matters
    [Show full text]
  • App. 1 in the SUPREME COURT of the STATE of IDAHO Docket No
    App. 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 46941 NOELL INDUSTRIES, INC., ) Boise, January a Virginia corporation, ) 2020 Term ) Plaintiff-Respondent, Opinion filed: ) May 22, 2020 v. ) Karel A. Lehrman, IDAHO STATE TAX ) Clerk COMMISSION, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Idaho, Ada County. Steven Hippler, District Judge. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Lawrence G. Wasden, Idaho Attorney General, Boise, for Appellant. Nathan H. Nielson ar- gued. Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley, LLP, Boise, for Respondent. Richard G. Smith argued. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MOELLER, Justice. This case concerns a straightforward issue of tax law: whether the gain from the sale of an ownership interest in a legal entity constituted “business income” under Idaho Code section 63-3027. In 2010, Noell Industries, Inc. sold its interest in a limited liability App. 2 company for a net gain of $120 million. Noell Indus- tries reported the income to Idaho, but paid all of the resulting tax on the gain to the Commonwealth of Vir- ginia, its commercial domicile. Following an audit, the Idaho Tax Commission concluded the net gain was “business income” pursuant to Idaho Code section 63- 3027(a)(1) and, thus, apportionable to Idaho. Noell In- dustries sought judicial review before the Ada County District Court pursuant to Idaho Code section 63- 3049(a). The district court ruled that the Commission erred when it (1) determined that Noell Industries paid insufficient taxes in 2010 and (2) assessed addi- tional tax and interest against it. The Commission ap- pealed.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 -2017 BSRA Annual Report Final
    Boston Street Railway Association, Inc. Fifty-Ninth Annual Report 2018 Our 2018 fiscal year, running from October 1, 2017 A This Time in History feature covered the Clarendon Hill through September 30, 2018, has been quite successful, Carhouse fire in 1918. both financially and in the many accomplishments that we The July-August issue had a summary of current MBTA were able to achieve. Efforts in our Publications happenings. The issue also showed a glimpse of the new Department, our Type 5 No. 5706 streetcar restoration Type 9 Green Line car, the new Red Line car mockup, program, improved RollSign content, and another great and wire cars on the MBTA. A This Time in History year of outstanding entertainment programs highlighted segment presented Wire Cars, Watertown, and Women the year. on the El. Also of major importance was our financial performance. In the past year your Editor has made an effort to include We saw a surplus of income received over expenses, more detailed current news events articles with helped by significant donations to the 5706 Fund and the supplementary images throughout the publication. We General Fund. Our Treasurer's annual report presents received many photo submissions but it was impossible these details. Your strong support has made great results to include them all, even if their quality merited possible. publication. The Editor is grateful for your submissions Our officers have presented reports, which follow, in their and thanks everyone who contributed. areas of responsibility. Please take the time to review The RollSign would not be possible without the hard work them.
    [Show full text]