DOCSLIB.ORG

Interpol Member Country Statutory Contributions 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interpol Member Country Statutory Contributions 2020 INTERPOL MEMBER COUNTRY STATUTORY CONTRIBUTIONS 2020 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR United States of America 19,627 11,535,769 Japan 11,114 6,532,254 Germany 7,186 4,223,572 France 5,461 3,209,703 United Kingdom 5,274 3,099,794 Italy 4,455 2,618,426 China 5,003 2,940,513 Canada 2,941 1,728,573 Spain 2,652 1,558,713 Australia 2,111 1,240,740 Brazil 2,575 1,513,456 Netherlands 1,781 1,046,783 Korea (Rep.) 1,937 1,138,472 Russia 2,161 1,270,128 Mexico 1,588 933,347 Switzerland 1,356 796,989 Sweden 1,246 732,337 Belgium 1,16 681,790 Austria 0,97 570,118 Turkey 0,949 557,775 Norway 0,867 509,579 Poland 0,842 494,886 Saudi Arabia 0,908 533,677 Denmark 0,718 422,005 Finland 0,598 351,475 Greece 0,602 353,826 India 0,617 362,642 Argentina 0,642 377,336 Portugal 0,467 274,479 Czech Republic 0,436 256,259 Ireland 0,407 239,214 United Arab Emirates 0,485 285,059 Israel 0,426 250,382 Venezuela 0,457 268,602 Singapore 0,397 233,337 South Africa 0,344 202,186 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR Hungary 0,234 137,534 Iran 0,332 195,133 Chile 0,309 181,615 New Zealand 0,265 155,754 Indonesia 0,333 195,721 Malaysia 0,268 157,517 Kuwait 0,246 144,587 Thailand 0,245 143,999 Slovakia 0,2 117,550 Colombia 0,24 141,060 Romania 0,144 84,636 Qatar 0,188 110,497 Luxembourg 0,116 68,179 Egypt 0,137 80,522 Libya 0,128 75,232 Philippines 0,141 82,873 Algeria 0,133 78,171 Peru 0,12 70,530 Slovenia 0,099 58,187 Oman 0,103 60,538 Croatia 0,098 57,600 Kazakhstan 0,100 58,775 Pakistan 0,086 50,547 Ukraine 0,089 52,310 Nigeria 0,12 70,530 Iceland 0,06 35,265 Cuba 0,069 40,555 Morocco 0,062 36,441 Lithuania 0,067 39,379 Iraq 0,083 48,783 Uruguay 0,065 38,204 Cyprus 0,053 31,151 Belarus 0,056 32,914 Bulgaria 0,05 29,388 Dominican Republic 0,051 29,975 Latvia 0,052 30,563 Ecuador 0,056 32,914 Trinidad and Tobago 0,046 27,037 Lebanon 0,049 28,800 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR Vietnam 0,053 31,151 Azerbaijan 0,053 31,151 Estonia 0,046 27,037 Serbia 0,044 25,861 Bahrain 0,047 27,624 Costa Rica 0,048 28,212 Syria 0,04 23,510 Tunisia 0,042 24,686 Afghanistan 0,033 19,396 Albania 0,033 19,396 Andorra 0,033 19,396 Angola 0,034 19,984 Antigua and Barbuda 0,031 18,220 Armenia 0,033 19,396 Aruba 0,031 18,220 Bahamas 0,035 20,571 Bangladesh 0,034 19,984 Barbados 0,033 19,396 Belize 0,031 18,220 Benin 0,032 18,808 Bhutan 0,031 18,220 Bolivia 0,034 19,984 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0,035 20,571 Botswana 0,035 20,571 Brunei 0,04 23,510 Burkina Faso 0,032 18,808 Burundi 0,031 18,220 Cambodia 0,032 18,808 Cameroon 0,034 19,984 Cape Verde 0,031 18,220 Central African Republic 0,031 18,220 Chad 0,032 18,808 Comoros 0,031 18,220 Congo 0,033 19,396 Congo (Dem. Rep.) 0,033 19,396 Côte d'Ivoire 0,034 19,984 Curacao 0,031 18,220 Djibouti 0,031 18,220 Dominica 0,031 18,220 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR Timor-Leste 0,032 18,808 Equatorial Guinea 0,034 19,984 El Salvador 0,035 20,571 Eritrea 0,031 18,220 Ethiopia 0,034 19,984 Fiji 0,032 18,808 North Macedonia 0,033 19,396 Gabon 0,036 21,159 Gambia 0,031 18,220 Georgia 0,033 19,396 Ghana 0,036 21,159 Grenada 0,031 18,220 Guatemala 0,04 23,510 Guinea 0,031 18,220 Guinea‑Bissau 0,031 18,220 Guyana 0,031 18,220 Haiti 0,032 18,808 Honduras 0,033 19,396 Jamaica 0,034 19,984 Jordan 0,037 21,747 Kenya 0,036 21,159 Kiribati 0,031 18,220 Kyrgyzstan 0,031 18,220 Laos 0,032 18,808 Lesotho 0,031 18,220 Liberia 0,031 18,220 Liechtenstein 0,033 19,396 Madagascar 0,032 18,808 Malawi 0,031 18,220 Maldives 0,031 18,220 Mali 0,032 18,808 Malta 0,036 21,159 Marshall Islands 0,031 18,220 Mauritania 0,031 18,220 Mauritius 0,034 19,984 Moldova 0,032 18,808 Monaco 0,034 19,984 Mongolia 0,032 18,808 Montenegro 0,032 18,808 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR Mozambique 0,032 18,808 Myanmar 0,034 19,984 Namibia 0,034 19,984 Nauru 0,031 18,220 Nepal 0,033 19,396 Nicaragua 0,032 18,808 Niger 0,031 18,220 Palestine 0,031 18,220 Panama 0,041 24,098 Papua New Guinea 0,032 18,808 Paraguay 0,035 20,571 Rwanda 0,031 18,220 Samoa 0,031 18,220 San Marino 0,032 18,808 Sao Tomé and Principe 0,031 18,220 Senegal 0,032 18,808 Seychelles 0,031 18,220 Sierra Leone 0,031 18,220 Sint Maarten 0,031 18,220 Solomon Islands 0,031 18,220 Somalia 0,031 18,220 South Sudan 0,032 18,808 Sri Lanka 0,04 23,510 St Kitts and Nevis 0,031 18,220 St Lucia 0,031 18,220 St Vincent and the Grenadines 0,031 18,220 Sudan 0,034 19,984 Suriname 0,033 19,396 Eswatini 0,031 18,220 Tajikistan 0,032 18,808 Tanzania 0,034 19,984 The Vatican City State 0,031 18,220 Togo 0,031 18,220 Tonga 0,031 18,220 Turkmenistan 0,039 22,922 Uganda 0,034 19,984 Uzbekistan 0,038 22,335 Vanuatu 0,031 18,220 Yemen 0,034 19,984 COUNTRY 2020% 2020 Contribution EUR Zambia 0,033 19,396 Zimbabwe 0,032 18,808 Total statutory contributions 100,06% 58,811,441.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Leading Innovation in International Police Cooperation
    Leading innovation in international police cooperation Milos MIJOMANOVIC Digital Crime Officer Digital Investigation Support / Cyber Directorate March 2018 INTERPOL For official use only Academia Cyber Threat Taskforce Law Enforcement INTERPOL Private Sector INTERPOL For official use only Digital Crime Investigative Support Coordinating and facilitating transnational cybercrime investigations and operations which involve intelligence sharing and providing guidance on best practices in conducting cybercrime investigations. Cybercrime Training Providing range of training courses, targeted to the needs of participants, covering topics such as emerging trends in cybercrime, investigation techniques, digital forensics and more Strategy & Outreach Bridging the gap between the police and information communication technology communities, bringing them together to fight cybercrime and to prepare for its future developments CYBERCRIME DIRECTORATE CYBERCRIME Cyber Fusion Centre A secure and neutral collaboration workspace for law enforcement & industry to share & develop cyber intelligence to tackle cybercrime and cyber-enabled crime INTERPOL For official use only DIGITAL CRIME INVESTIGATIVE SUPPORT Regional Bureau 24/7 Point of Contact Digital Crime Officer for Cybercrime Regional Working Group on Investigative and Operational Cybercrime for Heads of Units Support on Transnational (America, Africa, Eurasian, Cybercrime Middle-East & North Africa) INTERPOL For official use only Ransomware DDoS-For-Ransom Business Email Compromise Criminals to Diversify
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019
    Annual Report 2019 CONNECTING POLICE FOR A SAFER WORLD Content Foreword ................................................................ 3 Database highlights.................................................................................................. 4 Countering terrorism.............................................................................................. 6 Protecting vulnerable communities................................................... 8 Securing cyberspace............................................................................................ 10 Promoting border integrity....................................................................... 12 Curbing illicit markets ....................................................................................... 14 Supporting environmental security ............................................... 16 Promoting global integrity ....................................................................... 18 Governance ..................................................................................................................... 19 Human resources .................................................................................................... 20 Finances ................................................................................................................................. 21 Looking ahead .............................................................................................................. 22 This Annual Report presents some of the highlights of our
    [Show full text]
  • Misuse of Interpol's Red Notices and Impact on Human Rights
    STUDY Requested by the DROI committee Misuse of Interpol’s Red Notices and impact on human rights – recent developments Policy Department for External Relations Directorate General for External Policies of the Union PE 603.472 - January 2019 EN DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT STUDY Misuse of Interpol’s Red Notices and impact on human rights – recent developments ABSTRACT International organisations continue to report the abuse by some states of Interpol’s Notice System to persecute national human rights defenders, civil society activists and critical journalists in violation of international standards of human rights. Available case studies, written reports and interviews with organisations working in the field confirm the reported abuses. Recent Interpol reforms have made significant impact on safeguarding individuals both substantially and procedurally. Nevertheless, and especially considering the significant increase in the number of Notices and Diffusions in the Interpol system, reforms remain to be fully implemented and transparency and enforcement mechanisms continue to leave room for improvement. Taking as a point of departure the responses from the EU institutions and bodies, and EU Member States, the study recommends taking further steps for Interpol to ensure full implementation of recent reforms, a fully transparent system and consistent legal and procedural safeguards for individuals in the Interpol Notice System. EP/EXPO/B/COMMITTEE/FWC/2013-08/Lot8/22 EN January2019 - PE 603.472 © European Union, 2019 Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies This paper was requested by the European Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights (DROI) English-language manuscript was completed on 17 January 2019. Printed in Belgium.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERPOL Study on Fisheries Crime in the West African Coastal Region
    STUDY ON FISHERIES CRIME IN THE WEST AFRICAN COASTAL REGION September 2014 Acknowledgements The INTERPOL Environmental Security Sub-Directorate (ENS) gratefully received contributions for the contents of this study from authorities in the following member countries: . Benin . Cameroon . Cape Verde . Côte d’Ivoire . The Gambia . Ghana . Guinea . Guinea Bissau . Liberia . Mauritania . Nigeria . Senegal . Sierra Leone . Togo And experts from the following organizations: . Environmental Justice Foundation (EJF) . European Commission . Fisheries Committee for the West Central Gulf of Guinea (FCWC) . Hen Mpoano . International Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) Network . International Maritime Organization (IMO) . Maritime Trade Information Sharing Centre for the Gulf of Guinea (MTISC-GoG) . Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) . Norwegian National Advisory Group Against Organized IUU-Fishing . The Pew Charitable Trusts . Stop Illegal Fishing . Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) . United States Agency for International Development / Collaborative Management for a Sustainable Fisheries Future (USAID / COMFISH) . United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) . World Customs Organization (WCO) . World Bank This study was made possible with the financial support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Cover photograph: Copyright INTERPOL. Acknowledgements Chapter: Chapter: 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INTERPOL Member Country Statutory Contributions 2019
    INTERPOL member country statutory contributions 2019 2019 COUNTRY % Contribution EUR United States of America 19.440 11,136,398 Japan 12.070 6,914,420 Germany 7.738 4,432,791 France 5.875 3,365,553 United Kingdom 5.782 3,312,277 Italy 4.892 2,802,431 China 3.737 2,140,778 Canada 3.013 1,726,027 Spain 2.805 1,606,872 Australia 2.043 1,170,353 Brazil 2.036 1,166,343 Netherlands 1.954 1,119,368 Korea (Rep.) 1.924 1,102,183 Russia 1.763 1,009,952 Mexico 1.686 965,842 Switzerland 1.478 846,687 Sweden 1.401 802,577 Belgium 1.305 747,582 Austria 1.098 629,000 Turkey 0.926 530,468 Norway 0.883 505,835 Poland 0.849 486,358 Saudi Arabia 0.803 460,007 Denmark 0.785 449,695 Finland 0.665 380,952 Greece 0.664 380,379 India 0.560 320,802 Argentina 0.525 300,752 Portugal 0.499 285,857 Czech Republic 0.475 272,109 Ireland 0.436 249,767 United Arab Emirates 0.425 243,466 Israel 0.419 240,028 Venezuela 0.399 228,571 Singapore 0.368 210,812 South Africa 0.327 187,325 Hungary 0.259 148,371 2019 COUNTRY % Contribution EUR Iran 0.259 148,371 Chile 0.258 147,798 New Zealand 0.255 146,079 Indonesia 0.245 140,351 Malaysia 0.233 133,476 Kuwait 0.218 124,883 Thailand 0.214 122,592 Slovakia 0.209 119,728 Colombia 0.191 109,416 Romania 0.113 64,733 Qatar 0.138 79,055 Luxembourg 0.128 73,326 Egypt 0.117 67,025 Libya 0.117 67,025 Philippines 0.117 67,025 Algeria 0.107 61,296 Peru 0.099 56,713 Slovenia 0.092 52,703 Oman 0.085 48,693 Croatia 0.084 48,120 Kazakhstan 0.044 25,206 Pakistan 0.069 39,527 Ukraine 0.069 39,527 Nigeria 0.065 37,236 Iceland 0.063 36,090 Cuba
    [Show full text]
  • Organization Interpol
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. APR ~1976 , INTERNATIONAL' CRIMINAL ,POLICE ORGANIZATION INTERPOL / XXXVlllth GENERAL ASSEMBLY SESSION MEXICO 13th - 18th OCTOBER 1969 Report submitted by ~he GENERAL SECRETARIAT Subject : POWERS. AND DUTIES OF THE POLICE WITH REGARD TO DETENTION. A INTRODUCTION Backa-FC?1l.?d to. the survey. The Organisation's programme of activities adopted by tho G:~:c9ral Assembly sessions in.1965 and 1967 included an important survey, to be conctucted in several stages 7 of tho powers and duties of the police whon investigating offences against criminal law. The first part of this survey covers thG pm-Ters and dutios of the police with regard to the detention of persons. Circula.r N° 1898-POLNA!112 lias sent oat on 8th April 1968 to all ,'.' Interpol Nation9.l Central Bureaus 7 enclosing a q.uestionnaire on this subject. t. ; The Circular explained that the aim of the survey was to obtain information t~ from each a.ffiliated country on the legal conditions in which "the pOli.ce m~y ~ hold for a certain time for th~ purposes of criminal enquiries a person who • has not boen charged and for whom a 'tITarrant of arrest has nO'b been issued by ~.. \:0 a magistrate". .j. ~ 'r - 2 - - 3 - Power to datal'n or hold a person fO)' qu t' , vTe felt there was little point in dealing with arrests made by order exercise of the power of arrest. Fo~ t es lOnlng ~s subordinate to the of a magistrate with a view to bringing a person to trial, or arrests made in to the power of detaining a parson Whoh~:en~~un~rles therefors 7 with regard execution of a conviction, since the regulations governing such cases are arrest warrant has been; "''''ued 't c arged and for Vlhom no probably of a similar natuy.o in most oountries.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Lucia Evaluation Report on Drug Policies 2019 MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)
    MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION (CICAD) SECRETARIAT FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL SECURITY (SMS) Saint Lucia Evaluation Report on Drug Policies 2019 MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) SAINT LUCIA Evaluation Report on Drug Policies 2019 ISBN 978-0-8270-6903-9 PREFACE The Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism (MEM), under the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) of the Secretariat for Multidimensional Security (SMS), measures the progress achieved and challenges to member nations of the Organization of American States (OAS) in implementing the CICAD Hemispheric Plan of Action on Drugs 2016-2020. Mandated by the 1998 Summit of the Americas held in Santiago, Chile, the MEM is the only multilateral tool of its kind in the world. MEM evaluations are based on information provided by OAS member states, which is then analyzed by the MEM’s Governmental Expert Group (GEG), composed of experts from OAS countries. For this round, the GEG performed its work from mid-2018 to mid-2019. The evaluation process was transparent and inclusive in nature, with no experts involved in the evaluation of their own country. The GEG analyzed the following areas: institutional strengthening, demand reduction, supply reduction, control measures, and international cooperation, and its evaluation is based on the 29 objectives and corresponding priority actions of the CICAD Hemispheric Plan of Action on Drugs 2016-2020. (A few priority actions were not considered, given they are not measurable.) In addition, the seventh round reports include a discussion of member states’ progress over time during the seven MEM rounds. Prior to the GEG’s work, the MEM Inter-Governmental Working Group, also composed of representatives from OAS member states, designed the seventh evaluation round instrument during 2017, and the resulting questionnaire was then completed by member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnian National Extradited to Stand Trial for Murder and Torture
    HRSP NEWSLETTER U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Human Rights and Special Prosecutions Section June 2013 Bosnian National Extradited to Stand Trial for Murder and Torture On May 31, 2013, the United States extradited Sulejman Mujagic (“Mujagic”), a citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina (“Bosnia”) and a lawful permanent resident of Utica, New York, to stand trial for murder and torture during the armed conflict in Bosnia. Mujagic had been living in the United States since July 1997. Mujagic is wanted in Bosnia for the March 1995 “unlawful killing and wounding of the enemy,” committed during the armed conflict that followed the breakup of the former Yugoslavia. Bosnia has alleged that Mujagic, then a platoon commander in the Army of the Autonomous Province of Western Bosnia, summarily executed an unarmed Bosnian Army soldier and tortured a second soldier after the two prisoners had been captured by Mujagic and his men. In response to the Bosnian government’s request for extradition and in accordance with terms of the extradition treaty between the United States and Bosnia, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a complaint seeking Mujagic’s arrest and extradition in U.S. federal district court on November 27, 2012. Mujagic was arrested the following day in Utica, and a hearing to determine whether sufficient evidence existed to warrant his extradition was held on February 7, 2013. On April 2, 2013, a federal district court in the Northern District of New York ruled that Mujagic could be extradited to Bosnia to stand trial. On May 31, 2013, Mujagic was delivered to Bosnian authorities and removed from the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Training on Anti-Corruption, Financial Crimes and Asset Recovery in The
    11th INTERPOL Global Programme on Anti- Corruption, Financial Crimes and Asset Recovery: Anti-Corruption in the Forestry Sector 1-5 June 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia INTERPOL For official use only ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTERPOL would like to thank the Norwegian Agency for Development (NORAD) for its generous support of Project LEAF (Law Enforcement Assistance for Forests). This report is issued under the umbrella of INTERPOL’s Project LEAF, a global initiative to combat illegal logging—a crime type that is estimated to cost the global economy between USD 30 and 100 billion, and is linked to other forms of organized and transnational crimes. DISCLAIMER This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form to support capacity building and training of law enforcement without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. INTERPOL would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of INTERPOL, its Member countries, or contributory organizations, nor does it imply any endorsement. The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on any maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by INTERPOL. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of INTERPOL concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Front cover photograph: Participants, comprising 27 officials from 8 South East Asian countries.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERPOL Notices Program Operational Divisions
    INTERPOL Notices Program Operational Divisions INTERPO L, the International Criminal Po li ce At the core of INTERPOL Was hington's investigative O rga ni zation, ad ministers a system of Intern ational support activities is the INTERPO L Operations and "lookouts " or adviso ry notices that enables law Command Center (IOCC), which provides a 24/7/365 INTERPOL enforcement authori ties in member countries to share communicati ons interface between domestic and WAS HI NGTON critica l crime-related information. INTERPOL Notices intern at ional law enforcement partners. The IOCC are color-coded according to purpose: also supports the activities of IN TE RP OL Was hington's • Red: See k the location and arrest of a wa nted per­ operati onal divisions: son with a view to extrad ition or other lawful return. • Blue: Locate, identify, or obtai n information on a • Bo rd er Security Division perso n of interest in a criminal investigation. • Counterterrorism Division • Green: Warn about persons who are possible threats • Global Police Services Divisio n to publi c safety based on thei r prior criminal hi stories. Yellow: Locate a missi ng person or identify a person • Tra nsnati onal Crime Division unabl e to identify himself/herself. • Black: Seek inform ation on unidentified bodies. • Orange: Warn of an eve nt, person, object, or pro­ cess representing an imminent threat and danger to public safety. U.S. National Central Bureau • Purple: Provide information on modi operandi, procedures, objects, devices, or hid ing places used by criminals. Fo r additional info rmation, vis it our website: INTERPOL-UN Security Council Special Notice: http://www.justice.gov/interpol-washington Inform INTERPOL member countries that an in di­ vidual or entity is subject to UN sa nctions based on an association w ith terrori st groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report Summary Report
    WOMEN IN LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE ASEAN ASEAN REGION SUMMARY REPORT SUMMARY REPORT INTRODUCTION PHOTO: UN WOMEN/PLOY PHUTPHENG Law enforcement institutions1 and their leaders face a myriad of challenges in the twenty-first century. Security risks have become more diverse, characterized by LAW ENFORCEMENT global criminal alliances and rapidly changing technological advances. As a result, law enforcement agencies are trying to adapt, cultivate new skills and develop INSTITUTIONS CAN innovative ways of dealing with the ever-evolving transnational security threat landscape through drawing on a wider pool of competencies. These changes are ENHANCE THEIR directly linked to the need to value and promote diversity and inclusivity in law enforcement. CAPABILITY BY The summary report of the Research on Women in Law Enforcement in the ASEAN DRAWING ON THE region” summarizes some of the key findings, presents gender statics and high- lights selected recommendations from the main report. It offers a snapshot of the TALENT, KNOWLEDGE, current state of affairs with respect to their recruitment, training, deployment and promotion, and provides insights into policies and practices which support or hin- SKILLS AND CAPACITIES der their inclusion and empowerment. It brings together a range of data and is informed by focus groups and individual interviews organized in the 10 ASEAN OF THE ENTIRE Member States. A total of 193 female and male police officers contributed their views and experiences (including 184 female officers). Field visits were carried out POPULATION, I.E., between July 2019 and March 2020. The findings can inform regional and national policy developments, institutional practices and strategies as well as targeted sup- BOTH MEN AND WOMEN port from international partners to strengthen efforts to recruit more women and contribute to the meaningful employment of women in law enforcement careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Serious and Organized Crime in Central Africa
    Overview of Serious and Organized Crime in Central Africa 30 September 2018 ANALYTICAL REPORT ANALYTICAL INTERPOL For official use only This project is funded by the European Union This analytical report was compiled in the framework of the European Union (EU) funded Project ENACT (Enhancing Africa’s response to transnational organized crime) and was produced with funding from the EU. The contents of this report are the responsibility of the author(s) and can no way be taken to reflect the views or position of the European Union or the ENACT partnership. Authors contribute to ENACT publications in their personal capacity. © 2018, ENACT. Copyright in the volume as a whole is vested in ENACT, its partners, the EU and the author(s), and no part may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express permission, in writing, of the author and the ENACT partnership. ENACT is implemented by the Institute for Security Studies and INTERPOL, in association with the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. Disclaimer This publication must not be reproduced in whole or in part or in any form without special permission from the copyright holder. When the right to reproduce this publication is granted, INTERPOL would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses it as a source. All reasonable precautions have been taken by INTERPOL to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader.
    [Show full text]