DOCSLIB.ORG

Gershon Baskin on New Cease-Fire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gershon Baskin on New Cease-Fire Gershon Baskin on new cease-fire We pray that the new cease-fire will hold and lead to a geunine peace process. The following is the Nov. 28 edition of “This week in Israel….. Behind the news with Gershon Baskin,” published in the Jerusalem Times, East Jerusalem’s English-language weekly: The Cease fire Suddenly, out of nowhere, Israel and the Palestinians declared a bilateral cease fire. Even though, for the time being, the cease fire is limited to Gaza, it is a blanket cessation of hostilities covering all acts of aggression from both sides. This idea was presented to Prime Minister Olmert in the beginning of June 2006 by IPCRI but was summarily rejected by him for two reasons: (1) Israel would have nothing to do with an agreement that involved Hamas, and (2) because, he said, the Palestinians could not be trusted to enforce a cease fire. Olmert, at the time did say that if the Palestinians ceased their aggressive acts, Israel would have no reason to fire back. But then came the attack on Kerem Shalom and the kidnapping of Gilead Shalit and the sharp increase of Israeli aggression in Gaza leaving more than 350 Palestinians dead in the past months. Some of the explanations for the sudden change in policy might be: 1. A Change in US policy. Following the Republican loss of both Houses of Congress and the resignation of Donald Rumsfeld, it has been suggested that President Bush is now going to turn his attention to resolving the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Prime Minister Olmert may have heard about this change during his recent visit to Washington and decided to take some pre-emptive steps in that direction. Press reports after the US elections profiled the new Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and referred to a report that Gates was the co-author of by the Council of Foreign Relations on US policy vis-a-vis Iran. In the operative section of the report dealing with policy recommendations it was suggested that the US needs to work on isolating Iran and the best way to do that would be to strengthen US ties to moderate Middle East regimes. The report suggested that the best way to strengthen US ties in the region would be to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Bush has two years left in the White House and until now he was created greater instability in the region and has helped to bring about a situation where there are at least three possible civil wars in the region (Palestine, Iraq, and Lebanon). Bush has been consulting with the closest advisors and decision makers of the administration of his father’s administration, including James Baker. Baker has been working with former Congressman Lee Hamilton on preparing a detailed report for Bush on what should be done in Iraq. Leaks from that report have already appeared in the NY Times in which Bush is being advised to open dialogue with Syria and Iran. Baker has been deeply involved in Track II meetings between Israelis and Palestinians in the past years and it is well known that he is a strong advocate of the two-state solution. He also proved when he was Secretary of State that he has no hesitations about confronting the Government of Israel head-on. Most people recall Bakers strong position against Israeli settlements and his decision to withhold US loan guarantees when the stubborn Yitzhak Shamir was Prime Minister. In his famous press conference Baker stated that if Shamir wished to speak with him, Shamir could call him “my number is 242-338” (significant numbers which are very difficult to forget!). 2. No agenda. Since the war in Lebanon this summer it has been quite clear that Olmert’s government lacks a political agenda. I have written in this column in the past that governments without an agenda and without a political horizon that provides hope to the people do not survive for very long. Olmert had continued to hope that he could revive his plan for unilateral withdrawal from most of the West Bank, but that has grown increasingly unpopular in Israel. Recognizing the need for a new agenda, Olmert understood that he could not present anything new without a calming of the violence and he has finally understood that a cease fire must be bilateral. 3. Pressure on the Palestinians. The massive Israeli attacks and the heavy toll on the loss of life and property have also had significant impact on the Palestinian side. People in Gaza are fed up with the situation and feel a strong need for a relaxation period. 4. Progress on the internal Palestinian dialogue. Although the Palestinians have not yet reached full agreement on a new Government, it is recognized by all parties that Ismail Haniyeh will not be the Prime Minister in the new government. This was a major hurdle to cross. There also seems to be agreement on the appointment of Mohammed Shbair as the next Prime Minister, an Islamist academic, but not a member of Hamas. The dialogue has not reached agreement on the government’s platform nor on the acceptance of the Quartet demands, but it has been agreed that President Abbas will have a full mandate to carry on with negotiations with Israel. 5. Khaled Mashal backing the cease fire. Khaled Mashal, the main spoiler until now has come out on top and the main decision maker in Palestinian politics. This is, once again, thanks to Olmert’s resistance to deal with Abbas more seriously. Khaled Mashal came to Egypt for talks with the Egyptian leadership and the Palestinian factions. Once Mashal agreed to the terms of the cease fire was it possible to reach agreement with Israel. Although Israel never negotiated directly with Mashal, Olmert’s chief of staff, Yoram Torbovich and his chief policy advisor, Shalom Turjeman were meeting regularly with Saeb Erikat and Abass’s chief of staff Rafiq Husseini. Additionally, Israel has been in constant contact with Egyptian Security Minister Omar Suleiman and despite Suleiman’s rocky relationship with Mashal, he has the power and the ability to influence Mashal. Suleiman is on his way to Israel and Palestine to help to conclude the negotiations for a prisoner exchange that will bring about the release of Gilead Shalit. (more on this to follow). 6. The Olmert-Peretz feud. Both Olmert and Peretz are struggling to regain public confidence in their abilities to govern. Both are facing the lowest level of public support ever known by a Prime Minister and a Defense Minister in Israel. Over the past weeks, Peretz had initiated a dialogue with Abbas, much to the anger of Olmert. With a new feud between the two in place, it became clear that there would be a competition on who has the mandate to talk to the Palestinians. Although no direct meetings have yet been held, the competition between the two speeded up contacts between the advisors on both sides. 7. Marwan Barghouthi. In prison, Marwan Barghouthi has been actively engaged in internal Palestinian politics, helping to orchestrate the first tahdiya (calm or cease fire) and then leading the work on the prisoners’ document. Now, Barghouthi has been heavily engaged in the negotiations between the factions on reaching a new cease fire. Israel’s Channel 10 News disclosed last evening that Meretz MK Haim Oron (Jumas) has been deeply involved in intensive private meetings with Barghouthi for more than a year. The meetings were first authorized by Prime Minister Sharon and the by Olmert. We are sure to be seeing more of Barghouthi’s name in the press in the context of the future prisoner exchange. Now would be a very opportune time to release Barghouthi and to hope that he will capture the Palestinian leadership and lead other practical Palestinians towards new permanent status negotiations with Israel. The hope now is that the cease fire in Gaza will hold and that it will spread to the West Bank. Israel has given a green light for the return to the West Bank of the “Bader Brigade” – Palestinian forces in Jordan loyal to Abbas. A significant prisoner release including Barghouthi and the return of the Bader Brigade will help to stabilize the Palestinian situation. What will be important is for negotiations to resume between Olmert and Abbas that will strengthen the moderates. Additionally, life must return to more normalcy in the occupied territories. Israel must agree to re-open borders and crossings, to remove check points in the West Bank and to free the hundreds of millions of dollars of tax revenues that Israel is illegally holding since the elections of Hamas. Prisoner exchange negotiations Despite the optimism reported in the press about the negotiations and the statement of Olmert at the annual ceremony in memory of David Ben Gurion regarding a generous prisoner release, the negotiations are virtually frozen and the gaps are huge. Hamas is insisting to agree on the number of Palestinian prisoners to be released and the categories of prisoners to be included. Hamas is demanding that all of the women and minors be released (number about 400) and that an additional 1000 prisoners including those with life sentences, ill prisoners, Hamas politicians, leaders such as Marwan Barghouthi and Ahmad Saadat, and many others be included in the deal. Israel has been pressuring Hamas to submit lists of names in order to be more concrete in the negotiations. Hamas has insisted to first agree on the numbers and the categories and only then to submit the list of names. Israel has apparently agreed thus far to release between 300-400 prisoners.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HAMAS DIVIDED: TIME for a NEW POLICY? by Tally Helfont
    Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes A Catalyst for Ideas Distributed via Email and Posted at www.fpri.org October 2010 HAMAS DIVIDED: TIME FOR A NEW POLICY? By Tally Helfont Tally Helfont is an FPRI research fellow. Her research focuses on Middle East-related issues and radical Islamic movements. She has also instructed training courses on behalf of K3 Enterprises in Civil Information Management to U.S. Military Civil Affairs Units and Human Terrain Teams assigned to Iraq and Afghanistan. September 2010 marked the beginning of renewed peace negotiations in the Middle East. The American-brokered talks took some time to restart—18-months to be exact—and its two primary participants, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, were reluctant at best. The parties met on three separate occasions: in Washington D.C. from September 1-2, in Sharm El-Sheikh from September 13-14, and at the Israeli Prime Minister's official residence in Jerusalem on September 15. It is difficult to say whether there was any tangible progress achieved during these meetings, but as it currently stands, the continuation of these efforts is uncertain, and some would even say, unlikely. The United States, on the one hand, and Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia on the other, are exerting significant diplomatic pressure to bridge the current gaps and bring the two sides back to the negotiating table. But what about those who seek to obstruct such efforts? Chief among this camp is the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas. Through numerous statements and acts of violence, Hamas seemed intent on attracting attention during this period of negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviving a Regional Approach
    Reviving a Regional Approach Gilead Sher and Liran Ofek Despite the physical demarcation of the zone of the recent military !"#$!"%&%'!"()*%+**"(,-$&*.(&"/(0&1&-2(%3*()$!&/*$( !"%*4%(+*"%(+*..( beyond the geographical area and the ranges of the rockets shot from it. The operation illustrated the convergence of interests between Israel and 5$&)(-%&%*-2( 3'*\7(897:%(;"/*$(5)/*.(<&%%&3(*.=>'-'2(+3' 3('-(!" *(&9&'"( :.&7'"9(&( *"%$&.(&"/('"\;*"%'&.($!.*('"(%3*(*##!$%-(%!(:$!1!%*(&( *&-*[$*@( Moreover, after the operation, Israeli cabinet ministers spoke of the need to promote a regional initiative, either to achieve a long term solution concerning 0&1&- A and/or as an alternative to bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. 2 0&-(&(#!;"/&%'!"()**"( $*&%*/(#!$(&(:&$&/'91(-3'#%(M(#$!1(&(#$&1*+!$C( of bilateral negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians to multilateral $*9'!"&.(/'&.!9;*D(,-$&*.R-(!#[ '&.(-%&" *(%!+&$/(%3*(5$&)(F*& *(,"'%'&%'G*2( which is a proposed framework for multilateral engagement, has remained rather skeptical, and many still see it as a prescription for surrender more than an invitation to negotiations. 3 On the other hand, those who support a $*9'!"&.(#!$1&%()*.'*G*(%3&%(%3*(5$&)('"'%'&%'G*('-(1*&"%(%!(.*G*$&9*('"%*$*-%-( !11!"(%!(,-$&*.(&"/(-!1*(!#(%3*(.*&/'"9(5$&)(-%&%*-(H897:%2(>&;/'(5$&)'&2( I!$/&"2(&"/(%3*(J"'%*/(5$&)(81'$&%*-K2(&"/(%3&%(%!(%3'-(*"/2('%(-3!;./()*( reexamined as a framework for negotiations. L3*(5$&)(F*& *(,"'%'&%'G*(+&-(&""!;" */('"(MNNM2(O;-%()*#!$*(P:*$&%'!"( Q*#*"-'G*(>3'*./2(&"/(3&-(-'"
    [Show full text]
  • The Fatah-Hamas Reconciliation: Threatening Peace Prospects
    The Fatah-Hamas Reconciliation: Threatening Peace Prospects Testimony by David Makovsky Director, Project on the Middle East Peace Process The Washington Institute for Near East Policy February 5, 2013 Hearing of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa Thank you, Madam Chairwoman, Ranking Member Deutch, and distinguished members of the subcommittee for this wonderful opportunity to testify at your very first session of the new Congress. The issue of unity between Fatah and Hamas is something that the two parties have discussed at different levels since 2007 -- and certainly since the two groups announced an agreement in principle in May 2011. Indeed, a meeting between the groups is scheduled in Cairo in the coming days. One should not rule out that such unity will occur; but the past failures of the groups to unite begs various questions and suggests why unity may not occur in the future. While the idea of unity is popular among divided publics everywhere, there have been genuine obstacles to implementing any unity agreement between Fatah and Hamas. First, it seems that neither Fatah -- the mainstream party of the Palestinian Authority (PA) -- nor Hamas wants to risk what it already possesses, namely Hamas's control of Gaza and the PA's control of its part of the West Bank. Each has its own zone and wants to maintain corresponding control. Second, Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas has not been willing to commit to a Hamas demand for the end of PA security cooperation with Israel in the West Bank, which has resulted in the arrests of Hamas operatives by the PA.
    [Show full text]
  • Tough Choices on Hamas Prompt Arab Disarray by Andrew J
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1465 Tough Choices on Hamas Prompt Arab Disarray by Andrew J. Tabler, Simon Henderson Jan 27, 2009 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Andrew J. Tabler Andrew J. Tabler is the Martin J. Gross fellow in the Geduld Program on Arab Politics at The Washington Institute, where he focuses on Syria and U.S. policy in the Levant. Simon Henderson Simon Henderson is the Baker fellow and director of the Bernstein Program on Gulf and Energy Policy at The Washington Institute, specializing in energy matters and the conservative Arab states of the Persian Gulf. Brief Analysis rab support for the Palestinians has been the bedrock of Arab diplomacy for decades, but the recent Israeli A military action against Hamas fighters in the Gaza Strip has divided those backing Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah Party and those supporting its Hamas rival. A series of meetings before and after the January 18 unilateral Israeli ceasefire could mark the beginning of significant changes in Arab diplomacy concerning the Palestinians. Arab attitudes toward the emerging threat of a nuclear-armed Iran are also in flux. Background The recent diplomatic maneuvering was marked by drama and near farce. An effort by the small Persian Gulf state Qatar to hold a summit of all Arab states and Iran, as well as Syria-based Hamas leader Khaled Mashal, was challenged by Saudi Arabia, which attempted to host its own gathering. Instead, on January 19, a long-scheduled Arab economic meeting in Kuwait was transformed into a full-scale Arab summit. Historically, Arab summits are dominated by Egypt, the oldest Arab state, and Saudi Arabia, the self-proclaimed leader of the Islamic world and, by virtue of its huge oil reserves, the richest Arab state.
    [Show full text]
  • 001-Complaint-Henkin-V-Iran.Pdf
    Case 1:19-cv-01184 Document 1 Filed 04/24/19 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ESTATE OF EITAM HENKIN, by its legal ) representatives, Yoav Armoni and David ) Jackson, ) ) ESTATE OF NAAMA HENKIN, by its legal ) representatives, Yoav Armoni and David ) Jackson, ) ) I.Z.H., a minor, by his guardians ad litem ) YOAV ARMONI and DAVID JACKSON, ) ) M.H.H., a minor, by his guardians ad litem ) YOAV ARMONI and DAVID JACKSON, ) ) N.E.H., a minor, by his guardians ad litem ) YOAV ARMONI and DAVID JACKSON, ) ) N.Y.H., a minor, by his guardians ad litem ) YOAV ARMONI and DAVID JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) COMPLAINT ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-1184 ) THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN ) The Ministry of Foreign Affairs ) Imam Khomeini Ave., United Nations St. ) Tehran, Iran, ) ) ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD ) CORPS ) Armed Forces Headquarters ) Zone 7 – Shariati ) Ghoddoosi Square (Ghaar) ) Tehran, Iran, ) ) IRANIAN MINISTRY OF ) INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY ) (a/k/a Vezarat-e Ettela’at Va Amniat-e ) Keshvar a/k/a VEKAK a/k/a VAJA) ) Second Negarestan St., Pasdaran Ave. ) Tehran, Iran, ) 1 Case 1:19-cv-01184 Document 1 Filed 04/24/19 Page 2 of 39 BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMIC ) IRAN ) a/k/a Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of ) Iran ) No 198, Mirdamad Boulevard ) Tehran, Iran, ) ) BANK MELLI IRAN ) Ferdowsi Avenue ) 10 Building ) P.O. Box 11365-144 Tehran, Iran, ) ) BANK SADERAT IRAN ) 43 Somayeh Ave., ) P.O. Box 15745-631 ) Tehran, Iran, ) ) and ) ) THE SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC ) Ministry of Foreign Affairs ) Damascus, Syria, ) ) Defendants.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and Iran | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 1476 Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood and Iran by Mehdi Khalaji Feb 12, 2009 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Mehdi Khalaji Mehdi Khalaji, a Qom-trained Shiite theologian, is the Libitzky Family Fellow at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis uring a February trip to Iran, Hamas leader Khaled Mashal praised Iranian leaders for their support during D the conflict in the Gaza Strip, a further indication of the strengthening ties between the Sunni Islamist group, which the United States has designated as a terrorist organization, and the Shiite regime in Tehran. Mashal's statements come on the heels of the U.S. Treasury Department's terrorist designations of al-Qaeda leaders and operatives sheltered in Iran. These latest examples of Sunni-Shiite cooperation raise new questions about whether Iran can improve its relationship with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. While such a rapprochement appears unlikely, history suggests it is far from impossible. Iran has maintained informal ties to the Muslim Brotherhood for many years, and Shiite Islam probably has more appeal among Egyptian Sunnis than it does among Sunnis in other Arab countries. Iran's sharp criticism of Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak is also likely to resonate with Egyptian radicals under the thumb of the regime in Cairo. If Iran were to develop close relations with the Brotherhood, Iranian influence would grow considerably in the Arab world, giving Tehran a significant say among Arab radicals and, undoubtedly, producing dangerous developments for U.S. interests in the region. Ties between Iran and Sunni Extremists Egypt has long been suspicious of the connection between the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and Iran, based in large part on Iran's longstanding strong ties to Hamas -- an offshoot of the Brotherhood.
    [Show full text]
  • Turnover: What Are the Implications of Recent and Upcoming Changes in Hamas?
    Turnover: What Are the Implications of Recent and Upcoming Changes in Hamas? Yousef Munayyer March 15, 2017 Background importantly the United States and other western players. Over the course of this time, Since its establishment in the 1980s, the the Fatah faction in the West Bank has been led Palestinian Islamic Resistance Movement, or by Mahmoud Abbas, who is simultaneously Hamas, has increasingly become an important the chairman of the PLO as well as the player in domestic Palestinian politics as well president of the Ramallah-based Palestinian as in the armed struggle against Israel. As its Authority. The Gaza-based PA, run by Hamas, ranks and its role have grown over the years, has been led by Ismail Haniyeh, who served so too has tension with its rival Palestinian both as prime minister and as head of Hamas’s political faction Fatah. Despite opposing the Gaza-based political organization. Oslo Accords, Hamas decided to enter into the Palestinian political fray in 2006 when it fielded candidates for the Palestinian An Internal Election Legislative Council (PLC), an Oslo-created institution, and ultimately won enough votes For the first time in recent memory, there will to form a Palestinian Authority (PA) governing be a change in the figures playing these roles. coalition. What followed, along with Haniyeh, who has been the Gaza-based Hamas opposition to such an outcome from the West, prime minister since Hamas ran in the PLC was an unwillingness on the part of Fatah to elections, came up to the end of his second partner in any sort of wider coalition.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Multiparty Mediation in the Middle East Peace Process
    University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 8-1-2009 The Middle East Quartet of Mediators: Understanding Multiparty Mediation in the Middle East Peace Process Kris Arthur Bauman University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Bauman, Kris Arthur, "The Middle East Quartet of Mediators: Understanding Multiparty Mediation in the Middle East Peace Process" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 59. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/59 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. THE MIDDLE EAST QUARTET OF MEDIATORS: UNDERSTANDING MULTIPARTY MEDIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS __________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty and Dean of the Joseph Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver __________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________ by Kris Arthur Bauman August 2009 Advisor: Dr. Timothy Sisk Disclaimer The views expressed in this dissertation are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the United States government. ii Author: Kris A. Bauman Title: THE MIDDLE EAST QUARTET OF MEDIATORS: UNDERSTANDING MULTIPARTY MEDIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS Advisor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Gaza War”
    THE “GAZA WAR”: A Strategic Analysis Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Final Review Draft: Circulated for Comment and Updating February 2, 2009 Cordesman: The ―Gaza War‖ A Strategic Analysis 3/3/09 Page ii Executive Summary One can argue whether the fighting between Israel and Hamas in Gaza is a ―war,‖ or should be seen as just one more tragic surge in violence in the decades-long struggle between Israel and the Palestinians. It is, however, the first major armed struggle between Israel and Hamas, as distinguished between Israel and the PLO and Fatah. It also is a case study in how Israeli capabilities have changed since the fighting with Hezbollah in 2006, and in the nature of asymmetric war between states and non-state actors. This report examines the war in terms of the lessons of the fighting, what it says about the changes in Israeli tactics and capabilities and the broader lessons it may provide for asymmetric warfare. It analyzes the fighting on the basis of briefings in Israel during and immediately after the fighting made possible by a visit sponsored by Project Interchange, and using day-to-day reporting issued by the Israeli Defense Spokesman. The analysis reveals impressive improvements in the readiness and capability of the Israeli Defense Forces since the fighting against the Hezbollah in 2006. It also indicates that Israel did not violate the laws of war. It did deliberately use decisive force to enhance regional deterrence and demonstrate that it had restored its military edge. These, however, are legitimate military objectives in spite of their very real humanitarian costs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Plan on the Israeli-Palestinian Front
    AP PHOTO/MAJDI MOHAMMED PHOTO/MAJDI AP A Practical Plan on the Israeli-Palestinian Front By Mara Rudman and Brian Katulis December 2016 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG A Practical Plan on the Israeli-Palestinian Front By Mara Rudman and Brian Katulis December 2016 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 5 Making a deal: Analyzing the current context 11 Game plan to make a deal: Building blocks for progress 16 Conclusion 17 About the authors 19 Endnotes Introduction and summary The incoming U.S. administration has an opportunity to increase stability and advance U.S. security interests in the Middle East by outlining a framework for Israelis and Palestinians to make independent, coordinated, and constructive steps toward a two-state solution. This solution would support a safe and secure Israel and a sustainable, contiguous, and sovereign Palestine. At a time when the broader region continues to experience threats from civil wars, state fragmenta- tion, and terrorist networks, the Israeli-Palestinian front is one area where the incoming administration can build on decades of investments to help enhance security and construct lasting institutions to achieve a sustainable resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. President-elect Donald Trump has declared that he wants “to be the one that made peace with Israel and the Palestinians.”1 Direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians are unworkable right now, but Trump can move toward this goal if he starts to lay the groundwork with five key steps: 1. Outline a vision that includes a nonmilitarized Palestine and a territorial point framed as 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers
    Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers Forum on armed groups and the involvement of children in armed conflict Chateau de Bossey, Switzerland, 4 to 7 July 2006 ________________________________________________________________ Occupied Palestinian Territories Palestinian children and Hamas Catherine Hunter * An armed conflict marked by four decades of Israeli occupation The declaration of the state of Israel in 1948, and the subsequent occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip by Jordan and Egypt respectively, resulted in a massive displacement of the Palestinian people who were the majority population in the area known as Palestine under the British Mandate.1 The Arab-Israeli war of 1967 changed the picture of occupation, bringing the West Bank and Gaza Strip under Israeli control.2 National liberation groups such as Fatah sprang up and united their efforts under a single umbrella organization known as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). This was mainly supported by displaced Palestinian communities in neighbouring states, with limited impact on the population living under Israeli occupation. However, by the late 1980s a grassroots resistance movement began to take shape which cut its teeth in the 1987 popular uprising known as the first intifada. This uprising was quickly taken up by the secular political groups under the PLO banner, and later by Hamas, which had only just begun life as an independent movement, after starting out as an offshoot of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood.3 The first intifada paved the way for peace negotiations between the PLO and Israel from 1991, which led to the Oslo peace accords of 1993 and agreement on a framework for a two-state solution.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Gaza War: the War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted
    The Gaza War 2014: The War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted Hirsh Goodman and Dore Gold, eds. with Lenny Ben-David, Alan Baker, David Benjamin, Jonathan D. Halevi, and Daniel Rubenstein Front Cover Photo: Hamas fires rockets from densely populated Gaza City into Israel on July 15, 2014. The power plant in the Israeli city of Ashkelon is visible in the background. (AFP/Thomas Coex) Back Cover Photo: Hamas terrorists deploy inside a tunnel under the Gaza City neighborhood of Shuja’iya on Aug. 17, 2014. (Anadolu Images/Mustafa Hassona) © 2015 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13 Tel Hai Street, Jerusalem, Israel Tel. 972-2-561-9281 Fax. 972-2-561-9112 Email: [email protected] www.jcpa.org Graphic Design: Darren Goldstein ISBN: 978-965-218-125-1 Contents Executive Summary 4 Preface 5 Israel’s Narrative – An Overview 7 Hirsh Goodman Telling the Truth about the 2014 Gaza War 31 Ambassador Dore Gold Israel, Gaza and Humanitarian Law: Efforts to Limit Civilian Casualties 45 Lt. Col. (res.) David Benjamin The Legal War: Hamas’ Crimes against Humanity and Israel’s Right to Self-Defense 61 Ambassador Alan Baker The Limits of the Diplomatic Arena 77 Ambassador Dore Gold Hamas’ Strategy Revealed 89 Lt. Col. (ret.) Jonathan D. Halevi Hamas’ Order of Battle: Weapons, Training, and Targets 109 Lenny Ben-David Hamas’ Tunnel Network: A Massacre in the Making 119 Daniel Rubenstein Hamas’ Silent Partners 131 Lenny Ben-David Gazan Casualties: How Many and Who They Were 141 Lenny Ben-David Key Moments in a 50-Day War: A Timeline 153 Daniel Rubenstein About the Authors 167 About the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 168 3 Executive Summary The Gaza War 2014: The War Israel Did Not Want and the Disaster It Averted is a researched and documented narrative that relates the truth as it happened.
    [Show full text]