DOCSLIB.ORG

CALVARY PANDAN BIBLE-PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DHW BIBLE CLASS LESSON 39 ISAIAH CHAPTER 39 Theme: “The Painful Price for Showing Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CALVARY PANDAN BIBLE-PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH DHW BIBLE CLASS LESSON 39 ISAIAH CHAPTER 39 Theme: “The Painful Price for Showing Of CALVARY PANDAN part of Hezekiah. His "blunder" would bring about the demise of Judah BIBLE-PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH because the king of Babylon was given a glimpse of the wealth of Judah. DHW BIBLE CLASS Today many people, including LESSON 39 teenagers, are experts at showing off. They have mastered the art through ISAIAH years of practice. For example, they CHAPTER 39 may start with a subtle query of the other party’s welfare and that of his loved ones. The hope is that the other Theme: “The Painful Price for party will ask the same question in Showing Off!” return. This will give them the opportunity to blow their trumpet as THEME VERSE loud as possible so that all can hear. Isaiah 39:6 (KJV) "Behold, the days The desire to show-off is a come, that all that is in thine house, common failing among the successful. and that which thy fathers have laid up Those who do not do well (for example in store until this day, shall be carried bankrupts, convicts and the to Babylon: nothing shall be left, saith unemployed) have little to boast. In the LORD." fact, they want to hide their inadequacies so as to retain whatever little dignity they have. INTRODUCTION What are the biblical teachings What makes a man want to show on the subject of "showing off"? Is it a off? It is his pride. Hezekiah was such sin? If it is a sin, how serious is it? a man. It is sad that the extension of 15 years of his life resulted in a grievous act that brought about the OUTLINE destruction of Judah and Jerusalem. 1. The Visit (vv.1-2); Many Jews were placed in captivity 2. The Consequence (vv. 3-8). because of this incident. Isaiah 39 is an example of the severe consequences that can result from COMMENTARY one's action. The Visit – 39:1-2 This incident occurred soon after The visit originated from the son king Hezekiah was healed. The king of of the king of Babylon. His name was Babylon heard of his recovery and Me-ro'dach-bal'a-dan. He was the son sent an envoy bearing gifts. The show of Bal'a-dan, the king of Babylon at the of "concern" from a foreign king time. Who was Me-ro'dach-bal'a-dan? resulted in a serious blunder on the ISBE describes him as, ". a king of DHW LESSON 39 ISAIAH 39 the Chaldeans of the house of Yakin, Nebuchadnezzar. ISBE describes the and was the most dangerous and conflict and history between the inveterate foe of Sargon and his son Assyrians up to the time of the rise of Sennacherib, kings of Assyria, with the neo-Babylon Empire, "During the whom he long and bitterly contested time of Sennacherib, Merodach- the possession of Babylon and the baladan the Chaldean became a great surrounding provinces. Merodach- obstacle to Assyria maintaining its Baladan seemed to have seized supremacy over Babylonia. Three Babylon immediately after the death of times he gained possession of Shalmaneser in 721 BC; and it was not Babylon, and twice had himself till the 12th year of his reign that proclaimed king. For thirty years he Sargon succeeded in ousting him. plotted against Assyria. What is From that time down to the 8th learned from the inscriptions campaign of Sennacherib, Sargon and concerning him furnishes an his son pursued with relentless interesting commentary on the sending animosity Merodach-Baladan and his of the embassy, in 704 BC, to family until at last his son Hezekiah (2Kings 20:12; Isaiah 39:1) Nabushumishkun was captured and in order to induce him to revolt against the whole family of Merodach-Baladan Assyria, which he knew would help his was apparently destroyed. According own cause. Finally Sennacherib, in to the monuments, therefore, it was 690 BC, after he had experienced from a worldly point of view good much trouble by the repeated uprisings politics for Hezekiah and his western of the Babylonians, and the aspirations allies to come to an understanding with of Merodach-baladan, endeavored to Merodach-Baladan and the Arameans, obliterate Babylon from the map. His Elamites, and others, who were son and successor Esarhaddon, confederated with him. From a however, tried to make Babylon again strategical point of view, the weakness happy and prosperous. One of his first of the allied powers consisted in the acts was to send back to Babylon the fact that the Arabian desert lay statue of Bel-Merodach. He rebuilt the between the eastern and western city, and also restored other members of the confederacy, so that Babylonian temples, for instance, that the Assyrian kings were able to attack of Enlil at Nippur. The Babylonians their enemies when they pleased and solemnly declared him king. to defeat them in detail." Ashurbanipal, his son and successor, The superpower in that region followed his policy. The evidence of his was still the Assyrians. Their power operations at Nippur is everywhere might have waned after the deaths of seen in the shape of stamped, kiln- 185,000 troops but they had not lost dried bricks. their superpower status. The Neo- "Before Esarhaddon died, he Babylonia came into power around had planned that Babylonia should 625 BC. The Babylonian king was become independent and be ruled by called Nabopolassar, the father of his son, Shamash-shum-ukin, while Assyria he handed down to 2 DHW LESSON 39 ISAIAH 39 Ashurbanipal. But when the latter would present a good pincer came to the throne, Assyria permitted movement against the Assyrians if the former only to be appointed viceroy they were to try and attack either of Babylon. It seems also that even nation. some portions of Babylonia were ruled It was understandable for directly by Ashurbanipal. Babylon to make such a calculated "After 15 years Shamash-shum- military move but for king Hezekiah to ukin rebelled and attempted to accept and agree to it was sin. He was establish his independence, but not like other gentile kings. He was the Sennacherib besieged Babylon and king of Judah, the people of God. Such took it, when Shamash-shum-ukin a worldly alliance was an insult to the destroyed himself. Kadalanu was then LORD. Joining forces with a heathen appointed viceroy, and ruled over part nation to protect her borders was as of the country. Nabopolassar was the good as slapping God in the face. By last viceroy appointed by Assyria. At such a move, king Hezekiah had last the time had arrived for the declared implicitly that the LORD was Babylonians to come again unto their not able or strong enough to protect own. Nabopolassar who perhaps was Judah. Thus he needed to ask the a Chaldean by origin, made an alliance followers of idolatrous gods to help the with the Urnman Manda. This he LORD! This was the message strengthened by the marriage of his received even though this might not be son Nebuchadrezzar to the daughter the message intended by king of Astyages, the king. Nineveh finally Hezekiah! fell before the Umman Manda hordes, What Hezekiah did was a let and was razed to the ground. This down. It was sad to see him commit people took possession of Northern such a grievous sin just after the Assyria. The Armenian vassal states, LORD had extended his life. and Southern Assyria, as well as the Hezekiah was glad to see his title to Palestine, Syria and Egypt, fell visitors. The word "glad" means "to to Babylonia." brighten up." Hezekiah was more than The reason given was that they just happy. He brightened up! The visit had heard of king Hezekiah's illness of the Babylonian envoy filled him with and recovery. If king Hezekiah had importance. Just as the Queen of already recovered, was there a need Sheba came to visit king Solomon, to send an envoy and a present? It here a foreign king came to visit a was not for altruistic reasons. The Jewish king! To go to the home of Babylonians needed the help of the another king is to show respect and Jews and the Jews needed the help of honour to him. the Babylonians to keep the Assyrians The Bible recorded, "And at bay. This was a strategic move that Hezekiah was glad of them, and made very good military sense. shewed them the house of his Babylon was north of Assyria and precious things, the silver, and the Judah was South of Assyria. Together, gold, and the spices, and the precious the alliance of Babylon and Judah ointment, and all the house of his 3 DHW LESSON 39 ISAIAH 39 armour, and all that was found in his Babylon visitors. He answered, "All treasures: there was nothing in his that is in mine house have they seen: house, nor in all his dominion, that there is nothing among my treasures Hezekiah shewed them not." Why did that I have not shewed them." Hezekiah show these Babylonian men Hezekiah was truthful for he confessed all the wealth of the kingdom of to what he had done. To show your Judah? The sense of importance he riches to a foreign king, who might be felt made him lightheaded. He wanted a superpower later, would only invite to show them that he was worthy to trouble. It is like showing your receive the honour bestowed on him. treasures to a thief. He will bide his He opened all his treasuries to the time and wait for the right time to rob eyes of the king of Babylon to tell him your wealth! that he did the right thing in sending The judgment declared by the envoy to see him! Isaiah was to the point, "Then said Hezekiah’s attempts to impress Isaiah to Hezekiah, Hear the word of the king of Judah were sinful.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • J. Barton Payne, "The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence from Chapters 36-39," Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 6.2 (May 1963): 50-56
    J. Barton Payne, "The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence From Chapters 36-39," Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 6.2 (May 1963): 50-56. The Unity of Isaiah: Evidence from Chapters 36-39 J. Barton Payne [p.50] The four chapters of Isaiah 36-39 that appear also in II Kings 18-20 and that contain historical dialog between the prophet and his king, Hezekiah, have produced more critical debate than any other section of I and II Kings.1 They furnish also some of our primary evidence for the unity of the Book of Isaiah,2 forming, as Delitzsch has put it, a “bridge” to the prophecies that follow.3 A thorough treatment of this evidence hence becomes impossible under present limitations. The writer would seek, however, to indicate three specific areas within this larger discussion in which sharpened awareness may contribute to a defense of the total authority of Scripture. L. CONDITIONING FACTORS IN EVANGELICALISM’S APPROACH TO ISAIAH 36-39 If we take, for example, such a question as the relation of Isaiah 36-39 to II Kings 18-20, it appears at the outset that liberal and conservative writers reach opposite conclusions because of their respective methodologies. The liberal, e.g. S.R. Driver, limits his admissable evidence to inductive comparisons of literary detail and of thematic concepts; he thus decides in favor of the priority of Kings.4 The conservative, e.g. Franz Delitzsch, while utilizing historical prose style as a confirmatory factor, concentrates on two reasons that arise (1) out of an analogy with other sections of Kings and Isaiah and (2) out of the authority of Chronicles, deductively applied to the chapters in question; he thus insists upon the originality of Isaiah.5 Bible believing scholars appear to be conditioned by five distinctive principles.
    [Show full text]
  • Do the Prophets Teach That Babylonia Will Be Rebuilt in the Eschaton
    Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 1998 Do the Prophets Teach That Babylonia Will Be Rebuilt in the Eschaton Homer Heater Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Religions of Eastern Origins Commons, History of Religions of Western Origin Commons, Other Religion Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Heater, Homer, "Do the Prophets Teach That Babylonia Will Be Rebuilt in the Eschaton" (1998). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 281. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/281 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 41/1 (March 1998) 23-43 DO THE PROPHETS TEACH THAT BABYLONIA WILL BE REBUILT IN THE ESCHATON? HOMER HEATER, JR.* Dispensationalists have traditionally argued that "Babylon" in Revela­ tion 14 and chaps. 17-18 is a symbol indicating some form of reestablished Rome. * In recent days a renewed interest has been shown in the idea that the ancient empire of Babylonia and city of Babylon will be rebuilt.2 This conclusion comes from a reading of the prophets—Isaiah and Jeremiah
    [Show full text]
  • The Comparative Study Between MT and LXX-Isaiah 60:1‐12: an Example of the Translation Techniques of LXX-Isaiah
    The Comparative Study between MT and LXX-Isaiah 60:1‐12 / Hee Sung Lee 193 The Comparative Study between MT and LXX-Isaiah 60:1‐12: An Example of the Translation Techniques of LXX-Isaiah Hee Sung Lee* 1. Introduction In the past, the main interest in the LXX studies had been a textual one (text‐ criticism or text history), but in more recent years new voices have been heard raising the question of exegetical methods and theological approaches used by the Greek translators.1) It is commonly said that every translation is also an interpretation. But there are different levels of interpretation. Because in the process of translation whether the translator does literal interpretation or not it lies to some extent within his control. J. Barr elaborates two quite different degrees of interpretation which were of greater significant for the LXX transition. The first one is the “basic syntactic/semantic comprehension of the meaning of the text,” and the other type is higher level of interpretation: “there are matters of content, of reference, or of theological exegesis”.2) * A Lecturer at Chong Shin Theological Seminary, Old Testament. 1) For more information on the current scholarship, see Keun-Joo Kim, et al., “Study for Korean Translation of the Septuagint 1: Genesis 1:1-2:3”, Journal of Biblical Text Research 21 (2007), 53-68; Wolfgang Kraus and R. Glenn Wooden, eds., Septuagint Research: Issues and Challenges in the Study of the Greek Jewish Scriptures (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006); Michael A. Knibb, ed., The Septuagint and Messianism (Leuven: Leuven University; Dudley, Mass: Peeters, 2006); Claire Matthews McGinnis and Patricia K.
    [Show full text]
  • Eunuchs in the Bible 1. Introduction
    Acta Theologica Supplementum 7 2005 EUNUCHS IN THE BIBLE ABSTRACT In the original texts of the Bible a “eunuch” is termed saris (Hebrew, Old Testament) or eunouchos (Greek, New Testament). However, both these words could apart from meaning a castrate, also refer to an official or a commander. This study therefore exa- mines the 38 original biblical references to saris and the two references to eunouchos in order to determine their meaning in context. In addition two concepts related to eunuchdom, namely congenital eunuchs and those who voluntarily renounce marriage (celibates), are also discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION The concept of a “eunuch” (a castrate) is described in the Bible prima- rily by two words, namely saris (Hebrew, Old Testament) and eunouchos (Greek, New Testament) (Hug 1918:449-455; Horstmanshoff 2000: 101-114). In addition to “eunuch”, however, both words can also mean “official” or “commander”, while castration is sometimes indirectly referred to without using these terms. This study therefore set out to determine the true appearance of eunuchism in the Bible. The aim was to use textual context and, in particular, any circum- stantial evidence to determine which of the two meanings is applic- able in each case where the word saris (O.T.) or eunouchos (N.T.) occurs in the Bible. All instances of the words saris and eunouchos were thus identified in the original Hebrew and Greek texts of the Bible and compared with the later Septuagint and Vulgate texts, as well as with Afrikaans and English Bible translations. The meanings of the words were determined with due cognisance of textual context, relevant histo- rical customs and attitudes relating to eunuchs (Hug 1918:449-455; Grey 1974:579-85; Horstmanshoff 2000:101-14).
    [Show full text]
  • Isaiah 39-43
    Isaiah 39:1-8 ESV At that time Merodach-baladan the son of Baladan, king of Babylon, sent envoys with letters and a present to Hezekiah, for he heard that he had been sick and had recovered. 2 And Hezekiah welcomed them gladly. And he showed them his treasure house, the silver, the gold, the spices, the precious oil, his whole armory, all that was found in his storehouses. There was nothing in his house or in all his realm that Hezekiah did not show them. 3 Then Isaiah the prophet came to King Hezekiah, and said to him, "What did these men say? And from where did they come to you?" Hezekiah said, "They have come to me from a far country, from Babylon." 4 He said, "What have they seen in your house?" Hezekiah answered, "They have seen all that is in my house. There is nothing in my storehouses that I did not show them." 5 Then Isaiah said to Hezekiah, "Hear the word of the LORD of hosts: 6 Behold, the days are coming, when all that is in your house, and that which your fathers have stored up till this day, shall be carried to Babylon. Nothing shall be left, says the LORD. 7 And some of your own sons, who will come from you, whom you will father, shall be taken away, and they shall be eunuchs in the palace of the king of Babylon." 8 Then said Hezekiah to Isaiah, "The word of the LORD that you have spoken is good." For he thought, "There will be peace and security in my days." 1 Isaiah 40:1-31 ESV Comfort, comfort My people, says your God.
    [Show full text]
  • A Commentary on the Book of Isaiah by Pastor Galen L
    A Commentary on the Book of Isaiah By Pastor Galen L. Doughty Southside Christian Church September 2018 INTRODUCTION: This commentary is based upon my personal devotional notes and reflections on the Book of Isaiah. It is intended to help you better understand some of the historical background of the book and the theological issues in Isaiah’s prophecy. It is not a technical commentary designed for academic projects so I do not use footnotes or include a bibliography. This material is intended for use by members and friends of Southside Christian Church to help you in a verse by verse study of Isaiah. I try as much as possible to link what Isaiah says with other parts of the Bible especially the New Testament so readers can see the connections in Scripture. In the commentary there are occasional references to the original Hebrew words Isaiah used in a particular passage. Those Hebrew words are always written in italics and are transliterated into English from the Hebrew. I go chapter by chapter in the commentary and sometimes individual verses are commented upon, sometimes it is several sentences and sometimes a whole paragraph. This commentary is based on the New International Version and all Scripture quotations are taken from that version of the Bible. Books of the Bible, Scripture references and quotes are also italicized. DATE AND AUTHORSHIP: There is no disagreement among scholars that Isaiah needs to be split into two sections. The first from chapters 1-39 is set during Isaiah’s lifetime in the days of Kings Ahaz and Hezekiah of Judah and the destruction of the north Kingdom of Israel by the Assyrian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • DAILY BREAD the WORD of GOD in a YEAR by the Late Rev
    DAILY BREAD THE WORD OF GOD IN A YEAR By the late Rev. R. M. M’Cheyne, M.A. THE ADVANTAGES • The whole Bible will be read through in an orderly manner in the course of a year. • Read the Old Testament once, the New Testament and Acts twice. Many of you may never have read the whole Bible, and yet it is all equally divine.“All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect.” If we pass over some parts of Scripture, we will be incomplete Christians. • Time will not be wasted in choosing what portions to read. • Often believers are at a loss to determine towards which part of the mountains of spices they should bend their steps. Here the question will be solved at once in a very simple manner. • The pastor will know in which part of the pasture the flock are feeding. • He will thus be enabled to speak more suitably to them on the sabbath; and both pastor and elders will be able to drop a word of light and comfort in visiting from house to house, which will be more readily responded to. • The sweet bond of Christian unity will be strengthened. • We shall often be lead to think of those dear brothers and sisters in the Lord, who agree to join with us in reading these portions. We shall more often be led to agree on earth, touching something we shall ask of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Saved for His Glory Not Mine! Grace Community Church Isaiah 39:1-8 December 15,, 2019
    SERMON SERIES: ISAIAH- HOPE IN THE DARKNESS Pastor David Arghir Message #11: Saved for His Glory not mine! Grace Community Church Isaiah 39:1-8 December 15,, 2019 SAVED FOR HIS GLORY NOT MINE A FORGOTTEN PROMISE MADE IN CRISIS Isaiah 39:1-2 King’s healing is a miracle, because God is Savior King is delighted by his visitors and he displays his accomplishments, resources King made a promise to God during his terminal illness Isaiah 38:15 “But what can I say? He has spoken to me, and he himself has done this. I will walk humbly all my years because of this anguish of my soul.” King did not walk humble before God Life lesson: Did you make promises to Lord Jesus Christ? The promise to follow Jesus comes with personal responsibility If you made a promise, remember to fulfill it quickly Pride leads to destruction Since Jesus saved or restored your life, be humble! THE PURPOSE OF SALVATION(RESTORATION) King did not walk humble as he promised to God Isaiah 38:15 But what can I say? He has spoken to me, and he himself has done this. I will walk humbly all my years because of this anguish of my soul. (Isa 38:15) Isaiah 39:3-4 A series of awkward questions A sad end comes in near future but he doesn’t care Life Lesson: Human pride triggers God’s judgment even on those whom he has previously restored or healed. Message notes online: To download and to access a copy of this message’ notes go to http://gracecommunitympk.org 1 Life Group Homework/ Bible Study & Food for Thought (Questions and Scriptures for further study) NIV – New International Version or where is the case we use ESV- English Standard Version Quick Review Looking back at your notes from this week teaching, was there anything new you learned or anything that caught your attention, challenged or confused you? DIGGING DEEPER This weekend’s message, pastor David spoke about promise we made and how important is to keep them before God.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaiah 39:1-8, Flirting with Babylon
    ISAIAH ISAIAH 39:1-8, FLIRTING WITH BABYLON The events of this chapter, as with chapter 38, also occurred before the Assyrian invasion. The placement here is designed to show that Hezekiah is a man with faults who cannot be the Messiah. The true Messiah and His Kingdom will be the subject of much of the rest of Isaiah’s book of prophecy. Hezekiah was a well-known and important king in the area. Israel was the crossroads for international trade and marauding armies in the region. At this point in history, Babylon was a small nation emerging from under the shadow of Assyria. No one at that time had any idea that Assyria would soon fall from power and be replaced with Babylon. After Hezekiah’s illness, Merodach-baladan, king of Babylon, sent him a letter and a gift apparently wishing the Hebrew king well. It would have taken time for the word of Hezekiah’s illness and healing to reach Babylon, and an equal amount of time to send letters and a gift to Jerusalem. While there may not have been a large time gap between chapter 38 and 39, there had to be some months at the least. ,son of Baladan, king of Babylon [מְ רֹדַ ְך בַלְאֲדָ ן] Isaiah 39:1 1At that time Merodach-baladan to Hezekiah, for he heard that he had been sick [מִ נְחָה] and a present [סְ פָרִ ים] sent letters .[חָזַק] and had recovered means “Marduk has given a son (Merodach),” and “Bel is ,מְ רֹדַ ְך בַלְאֲדָ ן ,Merodach-baladan is the name of the Babylonian god we call Marduk ,מְ רֹדְַך ,his lord” (Baladan).
    [Show full text]
  • Isaiah 202 1 Edition Dr
    Notes on Isaiah 202 1 Edition Dr. Thomas L. Constable TITLE AND WRITER The title of this book of the Bible, as is true of the other prophetical books, comes from its writer. The book claims to have come from Isaiah (1:1; 2:1; 7:3; 13:1; 20:2; 37:2, 6, 21; 38:1, 4, 21; 39:3, 5, 8), and Jesus Christ and the apostles quoted him as being the writer at least 21 times, more often than they quoted all the other writing prophets combined. There are also many more quotations and allusions to Isaiah in the New Testament without reference to Isaiah being the writer. Kenneth Hanna wrote that there are more than 400 quotations from or allusions to the Book of Isaiah in the New Testament.1 J. A. Alexander noted that 47 of the 66 chapters of Isaiah are either quoted or alluded to in the New Testament, and that the 21 quotations attributed directly to Isaiah were drawn from chapters 1, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 29, 40, 42, 53, 61, and 65.2 The only Old Testament book referred to more frequently than Isaiah in the New Testament is Psalms. "It would be difficult to overstate the importance of Isaiah for the Christology of the church."3 The name of Isaiah, the son of Amoz, is the only one connected with the book in any of the Hebrew manuscripts or ancient versions. Josephus, the Jewish historian who wrote at the end of the first century A.D., believed that Isaiah wrote this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Testament Survey 14 - Ezekiel: God's Spokesman in a Foreign Land
    Old Testament Survey 14 - Ezekiel: God's Spokesman In A Foreign Land Five Old Testament books of prophecy are known as “the Major Prophets.” They are Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, and Daniel. Four of them are named for the prophet who wrote them. Lamentations is included because it was written by the prophet Jeremiah. Isaiah prophesied to the nation of Judah in the eighth century before Christ. Jeremiah prophesied to Judah during the time its people were being carried into the Babylonian Captivity. Ezekiel was taken into Babylon with the second group of captives. He was called by God to prophesy to the captives in Babylon. Daniel was in the first group who were taken captive. He served God as a prophet in the courts of the king of Babylon. Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel were contemporaries. This means that their lives overlapped. However, Isaiah lived about one hundred years earlier. Isaiah foretold the coming of the Babylonian Captivity (Isaiah 39). Jeremiah preached to the people of God and told them to accept the period of captivity as just punishment from God for their sins (Jeremiah 25). Ezekiel spoke of the return from Babylon (Ezekiel 20:39-44). Daniel foretold what would happen to the Jews after the time of the Babylonian Captivity (Daniel 8-11). We must keep in mind there were three times the Jews were carried into Babylon. In 606 B.C. certain of the royal family including Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-Nego were taken (Daniel 1:1-6; 2 Kings 24:1). In 596 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Riddles of Reference: “I” and “We” in the Books of Isaiah and Jeremiah: the Relation of the Suffering Characters in the Books of Isaiah and Jeremiah
    Fischer, “Riddles of Reference,” OTE 25/2 (2012): 277-291 277 Riddles of Reference: “I” and “We” in the Books of Isaiah and Jeremiah: The Relation of the Suffering Characters in the Books of Isaiah and Jeremiah GEORG FISCHER (UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK ) ABSTRACT The use of “I” and “We” in literature is a delicate issue, especially when the references are left open. In some cases authors wish to involve their audience more (A). This feature can also be observed in the Books of Isaiah (B) and Jeremiah (C), and in some instances it is connected with suffering figures. In Isaiah “YHWH ’s servant” is outstanding among them, in Jeremiah the prophet himself. Interest- ingly, their portrayals show a number of common traits, and even the same or similar expressions. A comparison and analysis of them (D) points in the direction that the figure of the prophet Jeremiah seems to be a realisation of the servant and his fate, even radical- ized to some extent, and that the book of Jeremiah is later than Isaiah, as a whole. The servant in Isaiah, and in Jeremiah the prophet of the same name , both testify personally, speaking with “I,” to a common message, namely that God achieves his goals through the suffering of his elect. A THE USE OF THE FIRST PERSON IN LITERATURE “First person figurations of servant and suffering in Isaiah and Jeremiah” was the theme proposed by the chairs of two SBL-subgroups. 1 Ulrich Berges, as a specialist on Isaiah, 2 was expected to present from this prophet’s perspective, and my contribution was to cover the part of Jeremiah and a comparison of both prophets under the two aspects of the theme.
    [Show full text]