DOCSLIB.ORG

Person County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Person County PERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA 304 South Morgan Street, Room 215 Roxboro, NC 27573-5245 336-597-1720 Fax 336-599-1609 May 15, 2017 9:00am CALL TO ORDER………………………………………………. Chairman Kendrick INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF AGENDA RECOGNITION: ITEM #1 Person County EMS receives the Silver Plus award from American Heart Association Mission Lifeline ………………………... Douglas Young PUBLIC HEARING: ITEM #2 Request from Woodsdale Farm, LLC for a Special Use Permit for a Solar Farm, Tax Map A58 Parcel 12, Woodsdale Township, owned by Lindsay and John Wagstaff ………………………………………………. Lori Oakley ITEM #3 Consideration to Grant or Deny Request from Woodsdale Farm, LLC for a Special Use Permit for a Solar Farm, Tax Map A58 Parcel 12, Woodsdale Township, owned by Lindsay and John Wagstaff …………………………………….. Chairman Kendrick 1 INFORMAL COMMENTS The Person County Board of Commissioners established a 10 minute segment which is open for informal comments and/or questions from citizens of this county on issues, other than those issues for which a public hearing has been scheduled. The time will be divided equally among those wishing to comment. It is requested that any person who wishes to address the Board, register with the Clerk to the Board prior to the meeting. ITEM #4 DISCUSSION/ADJUSTMENT/APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes of April 17, 2017, B. Approval of Minutes of May 1, 2017, C. Resolution Appointment Review Officers, D. Emergency Communications Network (Code Red) renewal Contract, E. Budget Amendment #20, and F. Tax Adjustments for May 2017 a. Tax Releases b. NC Vehicle Tax System pending refunds NEW BUSINESS: ITEM #5 Resolution of Support for a Permanent Clean Water Solution .......................................................................................... Commissioner Jeffers ITEM #6 Letter of Support for Required Local Matches and Other Contributions for P4.0 Non-Highway Draft Programmed Projects …... Ray Foushee ITEM #7 A Resolution Amending the Person County Economic Development Commission for a change in membership …….. Vice Chairman Powell ITEM #8 Solid Waste Options …………………………………………………………. Sybil Tate ITEM #9 Presentation of the Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Recommended Budget ……… Heidi York CHAIRMAN’S REPORT MANAGER’S REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS/COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION #1 A motion to enter into Closed Session per General Statute 143-318.11(a)(1) for the purpose to prevent the disclosure of information that is privileged or confidential pursuant to the law of this State or of the United States, or not considered a public record within the meaning of Chapter 132 of the General Statutes. Note: All Items on the Agenda are for Discussion and Action as deemed appropriate by the Board. 2 AGENDA ABSTRACT Meeting Date: May 15, 2017 Agenda Title: Person County EMS receives the Silver Plus Award from American Heart Association Mission Lifeline Summary of Information: The program, which started in 2015, recognizes EMS teams across the nation for their vital role in providing timely treatment for STEMI patients through Mission Lifeline systems of care. STEMI, which stands for S-T Elevation Myocardial Infraction, simply means that a patient is having an active heart attack that is recognized by the Paramedics on an EKG. In most cases, one of the major arteries in the heart is either partially or fully blocked and requires percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a cardiac catheterization lab. The recognition focuses on two required metrics, 12-lead ECGs on non-traumatic chest pain patients and first medical contact (FMC) to Balloon time less than 90 minutes. The recognition requires a quality system of care with the referring PCI center, which is coordinated with the Duke AMI Coordinator Candance Van Vleet. There are three levels of awards, Bronze (1 quarter successful), Silver (1 year) and Gold (2 years). Person County EMS has been awarded the Silver Plus award, which is the highest award possible for first year applicants. In 2016, 28 agencies in North Carolina received this award. Of those 28 agencies, 2 agencies are of comparable population and distance from a PCI Hospital. Those counties are Davie County and Stokes County. Each of these counties has an average transport time to a PCI hospital around 34 minutes, which our average is between 35 and 45 minutes depending on if we transport to Duke Regional or Duke. Davie County EMS (Silver Award) Square Miles: 267 8186 calls (2014) Population: 42,013 (2016) 3 EMS Stations 5 ALS ambulances & 1 Supervisor 24/7 Stokes County EMS (Silver Award) Square Miles: 456 9522 calls (2016) Population: 46,067 (2016) 4 EMS Stations 5 ALS ambulances & 1 Supervisor 24/7 This recognition truly shows the high level of care and impact that our Paramedics are making on the citizens and visitors of Person County, especially in a County as rural as ours. Recommended Action: Recognize the hard work and impact that our Paramedics provide to the citizens and visitors of Person County. Submitted By: Douglas R. Young, Director of Emergency Services 3 2017 Mission: Lifeline® EMS Recognition Criteria and Measures ACHIEVEMENT CRITERIA: Each measure must achieve at least 75% compliance for the year per award level to be eligible for recognized status. The 2017 award period includes patients treated from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016 (See additional award period details at the end of document for low volume agencies) Patient volume requirements pertain to achievement measures #2 and/or #3 below*. It is assumed when volume requirements are met for measure #2 and #3; volume requirements will also be met for measure #1. Data is to be submitted in quarterly intervals as stated below: • Quarter 1 – January, February, March • Quarter 2 – April, May, June • Quarter 3 – July, August, September • Quarter 4 – October, November, December ACHIEVEMENT MEASURES: Note: Agencies that transport to both PCI capable and Non-PCI capable hospitals will report measures #1, 2, and 3. Agencies that only transport to PCI-capable hospitals will report measures #1 and #2. Agencies that only transport to non--PCI capable hospitals will report measures #1 and #3. Achievement Measure 1. Percentage of patients with non-­traumatic chest pain ≥ 35 years, treated and transported by EMS who received a pre--hospital 12--lead electrocardiogram Achievement Measure 2. Percentage of STEMI patients treated and transported directly to an STEMI receiving center, with prehospital first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes 4 Achievement Measure 3. Percentage of lytic eligible STEMI patients treated and transported to an STEMI referring hospital for fibrinolytic therapy with a door--to-­needle time ≤30 minutes NEW PLUS MEASURE (Optional): Plus Measure 1. Percentage of 12 lead ECGs performed on patients in the field with an initial complaint of non- traumatic chest pain ≥ 35 years, within 10 minutes of EMS arrival to the patient. Inclusion Criteria: Patients with non-traumatic chest pain, 35 years of age or over, and transported by EMS Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator who received a prehospital 12 lead ECG within 10 minutes of EMS (12 lead capable) arrival REPORTING MEASURES (Optional): Reporting Measure 1: The percentage of hospital notifications or 12 lead transmissions suggesting an STEMI Alert (or CCL activation) that are performed within 10 minutes of the first STEMI positive 12 lead ECG in the field Inclusion Criteria: Patients assessed and transported by EMS, who had an STEMI positive ECG. Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator for whom a successful hospital notification of STEMI or successful transmission of the 12 lead ECG occurred within 10 minutes of the first STEMI positive ECG. Reporting Measure 2: Percentage of patients with suspected stroke for whom EMS provided advance notification to the receiving hospital 5 Inclusion Criteria: Patients assessed and transported by EMS who had an EMS impression of suspected stroke. Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator for whom an advance notification of a stroke was provided to the destination hospital. Reporting Measure 3: Percentage of patients with suspected stroke evaluated by EMS, who had an EMS documented Last Known Well (LKW) time. Inclusion Criteria: Patients assessed and transported by EMS, who had an EMS impression of suspected stroke. Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator for whom EMS documented the Last Known Well (LKW) time. Reporting Measure 4: Percentage of OHCA patients with sustained ROSC maintained to arrival at the emergency department who had a 12 lead ECG performed. Inclusion Criteria: Patients with Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) with a Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) maintained to arrival at the emergency department. Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator for whom EMS performed a 12 lead ECG. Reporting Measure 5: Percentage of OHCA patients with sustained ROSC maintained to arrival at the emergency department who were transported to a PCI-capable hospital. Inclusion Criteria: Patients with Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) with a Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) maintained to arrival at the emergency department 6 Denominator: Total number of patients that meet the above inclusion criteria. Numerator: Total number of patients in the denominator transported to a hospital capable of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Reporting Measure 6: Percentage of 12 lead ECGs performed on patients in the field with an initial complaint of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) symptoms, within 10 minutes of EMS arrival to the patient: Inclusion Criteria: Patients with symptoms consistent with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) 35 years of age or over, and transported by EMS.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013
    Environmental Assessment of the Lower Cape Fear River System, 2013 By Michael A. Mallin, Matthew R. McIver and James F. Merritt August 2014 CMS Report No. 14-02 Center for Marine Science University of North Carolina Wilmington Wilmington, N.C. 28409 Executive Summary Multiparameter water sampling for the Lower Cape Fear River Program (LCFRP) has been ongoing since June 1995. Scientists from the University of North Carolina Wilmington’s (UNCW) Aquatic Ecology Laboratory perform the sampling effort. The LCFRP currently encompasses 33 water sampling stations throughout the lower Cape Fear, Black, and Northeast Cape Fear River watersheds. The LCFRP sampling program includes physical, chemical, and biological water quality measurements and analyses of the benthic and epibenthic macroinvertebrate communities, and has in the past included assessment of the fish communities. Principal conclusions of the UNCW researchers conducting these analyses are presented below, with emphasis on water quality of the period January - December 2013. The opinions expressed are those of UNCW scientists and do not necessarily reflect viewpoints of individual contributors to the Lower Cape Fear River Program. The mainstem lower Cape Fear River is a 6th order stream characterized by periodically turbid water containing moderate to high levels of inorganic nutrients. It is fed by two large 5th order blackwater rivers (the Black and Northeast Cape Fear Rivers) that have low levels of turbidity, but highly colored water with less inorganic nutrient content than the mainstem. While nutrients are reasonably high in the river channels, major algal blooms have until recently been rare because light is attenuated by water color or turbidity, and flushing is usually high (Ensign et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina
    Regional and County Population Change in North Carolina A Summary of Trends from April 1, 2010 through July 1, 2016 North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management December 2017 Introduction The following document summarizes population trends for North Carolina using the certified county population estimates produced by the North Carolina Office of State Budget and Management (OSBM) released in September of 2017. These certified population estimates are as of July 1, 2016.1 Additional population tables that include statistics for all 100 counties can be obtained from https://www.osbm.nc.gov/demog/county‐estimates.2 Highlights: North Carolina grew by 620,254 people between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2016, a 6.5% increase; Three of every four people added in this period were living in central North Carolina3; 95% of all growth occurred within metropolitan counties4; Among regional planning areas, only the Upper Coastal Plain Council of Governments experienced population decline; The fastest growing metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) since April 1, 2010 were the North Carolina portion of the Myrtle Beach‐Conway‐North Myrtle Beach MSA, the Raleigh MSA, the North Carolina portion of the Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA, and the Wilmington MSA. Only the Rocky Mount MSA experienced population decline since the last census, losing 4,460 people (a 2.9% decline); The Charlotte‐Concord‐Gastonia MSA remains the largest metropolitan area in the state (at 2.1 million people); Mecklenburg (1.1 million) and Wake (1.0 million) Counties remain
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk Under the Proposed WOTUS Definition
    CAPE FEAR RIVER WATERSHED: A Case Study of Carolina Bays and Ditched Streams at Risk under the Proposed WOTUS Definition The Cape Fear River. Photo by Kemp Burdette The Cape Fear River Basin is North Carolina’s largest watershed, with an area of over 9,000 square miles. Major tributaries include the Deep River, the Haw River, the Northeast Cape Fear River, the Black River, and the South River. These rivers converge to form a thirty-mile-long estuary before flowing into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear.1 The Cape Fear supplies water to some of the fastest ​ growing counties in the United States;2 roughly one in five North Carolinians gets their drinking ​ water from the Cape Fear, including residents of Greensboro, Fayetteville, and Wilmington.3 ​ The Cape Fear Basin is a popular watershed for a variety of recreation activities. State parks along the river include Haw River State Park, Raven Rock State Park, and Carolina Beach State Park. The faster-flowing water of the upper basin is popular with paddlers, as are the slow meandering blackwater rivers and streams of the lower Cape Fear and estuary. Fishing is very popular; the Cape Fear supports a number of freshwater species, saltwater species, and even anadromous (migratory) species like the endangered sturgeon, striped bass, and shad. Cape Fear River Watershed: Case Study Page 2 of 8 The Cape Fear is North Carolina’s most ecologically diverse watershed; the Lower Cape Fear is notable because it is part of a biodiversity “hotspot,” recording the largest degree of biodiversity on the eastern seaboard of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Wilmington
    SPOTLIGHT ON WILMINGTON WELCOME TO WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA The city has been declared “The Next Big Thing” by national media as one of the best places to live in North Carolina. Nestled between the Cape Fear River and Atlantic Ocean, Wilmington strikes an enviable balance between a casual lifestyle and global business opportunities and makes an ideal destination for moving to North Carolina. Entrepreneurial zeal permeates every facet of the community, giving it the vibrancy of a city much larger in size, with the ease of living found in a small town. Contents Climate and Geography 02 Cost of Living and Transportation 03 Sports and Outdoor Activities 04 Shopping and Dining 05 Schools and Education 06 GLOBAL MOBILITY SOLUTIONS l SPOTLIGHT ON WILMINGTON l 01 SPOTLIGHT ON WILMINGTON CLIMATE Wilmington, NC Climate Graph Wilmington has a humid subtropical climate, characterized by hot, usually humid summers and mild to cold winters. People in Wilmington breathe easily because the air quality for Wilmington is rated 21% better than the national average and the pollution index is 16% better than the national average. Average High/Low Temperatures Low / High January 36oF / 56oF July 73oF / 90oF Average Precipitation Rain 58 in. Snow 1 in. GEOGRAPHY Wilmington is in a part of North Carolina known as the Tidewater or Coastal Plain. This area is characterized by thick forests of pines and other evergreens; due to the sandy soils it is difficult for many deciduous trees to grow. This portion of the state contains the Outer Banks, sandy islands that do not have coral reefs to attach to and thus are constantly shifting their locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Resilience Assessment of the Cape Fear Watershed
    PILOT: Coastal Resilience Assessment of the Cape Fear Watershed i IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood hazards and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS DISCLAIMER: NFWF’s assessment methodology focuses on identifying and ranking Resilience Hubs, or undeveloped areas of open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Link to Duke Joint Factual Statement
    UNITED STAT8S DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION No . 5 : 15-CR-62-H No. 5 : 15-CR-67-H No. 5 : 15-CR-68-H UNITED STATES OF AMSRICA v. JOINT FACTUAL STATEMENT DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES LLC DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS , LLC DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS , INC . I . INTRODUCTION Defendants Duke Energy Business Services LLC (" DUKE ENERGY BUSINESS SERVICES"), Duke Energy Carol inas, LLC (" DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS") , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. ("DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS") , (collectively referred to as " Defendants") and the United States of America, by and through t he United States Attorneys for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the Middle Distri ct of North Carolina and the Western District of North Carolina and the Environmental Crimes Section of the United States Department of Justice (collectively referred to herein as " the United States" or "the government" ) , hereby agree that this Joint Factual Statement is a true and accurate statement of the Defendants ' crimi nal conduct a nd that it provides a sufficient basis for the Defendants ' pleas of guilty to the following charging documents and the terms of the Plea Agreements : United States v. Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc ., No. 5 : 15-CR-62-H; United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc., No . 5 : 15-CR-67-Il; and United States v . Duke Energy Business Services, LLC , Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC , and Duke Energy Progress, Inc. , No . 5 : 15-CR-68-H . The charges from the Middle District of North Carolina and the Wes tern District of North Carolina have been transferred to the Eastern District of North Carolina for purposes o f plea pursuant to Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts in Brief on North Carolina
    Facts in Brief on North Carolina Public Schools of North Carolina State Board of Education Department of Public Instruction Elementary Social Studies Web site: www.ncpublicschools.org January 1, 2006 Student Sampler Facts in Brief on North Carolina is produced by the Elementary Social Studies Division North Carolina Department of Public Instruction For questions or comments regarding this document, please contact Amy Turnbaugh at [email protected] or Michelle Weaver at [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction Letter from June Atkinson 4 Letter from Howard Lee 5 Letter from Governor Easley 6 General Information about North Carolina 7 Symbols 7 Flag 8 Name and nicknames 9 Seal 10 Song 12 Toast 14 Economy Gross State Product 15 North Carolina Exports 15 Employment 15 Education Public Schools of NC 16 Community Colleges 16 Private Universities and Colleges 16 UNC System 17 Government State Government 18 Governor Easley 19 Governor Easley’s Cabinet 21 North Carolina Council of State 22 Federal Government 23 Local Government 24 Military Installations 25 History NC Firsts 26 Highlights from History 27 People Populations 29 Sampling of Famous North Carolinians 29 Physical Geography Location 30 Landforms 30 Regions Coastal Plain 30 Piedmont 31 Mountains 31 NC Maps 32 Recreation and Places to Visit 38 Web Resources 39 General Information about North Carolina Statehood: November 21, 1789, the 12th state State Capital: Raleigh (established 1792) State Colors: Blue and Red State Motto: Esse Quam Videri (To Be Rather Than To Seem) State Nickname: The Tar Heel State Name Origin: From Latin “Carolus” in honor of King Charles I of England State Song: “The Old North State”; words written by William Gaston, music collected and arranged by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Brunswick County Comprehensive Historical Architectural Site Survey
    Comprehensive Historical/Architectural Site Survey of Brunswick County, North Carolina Prepared for Brunswick County Board of Commissioners PO Box 249 Bolivia, NC 28422 Prepared by Landmark Preservation Associates 6 Houston Street Lexington, VA 24450 September 2010 Table of Contents Introduction and Methodology ........................................................................................ ii Historic and Architectural Contexts Early History: 1664‐1800 ......................................................................................................... 1‐1 Plantation Society: 1800‐1865................................................................................................. 1‐9 Later History: 1865‐1960 ....................................................................................................... 1‐20 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 1-50 Proposed Gause Landing Historic District Map ...................................................................... 1‐53 Southport Historic District & Recommended Study Areas District Map ................................ 1‐54 Appendix A – Brunswick County Historic Resources Map Coding ........................ A-1 Appendix B – Brunswick County Historic Photographs............................................B-1 Appendix C – Brunswick County Surveyed Properties by Survey Site Number ... C-1 Appendix D – Brunswick County NRAC Study List Candidate Narratives/Presentation ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • College and Career Readiness Program Providers Contact List FY 2020-2021
    College and Career Readiness Program Providers Contact List FY 2020-2021 Provider Director E-mail Phone Ext. Alamance CC Physical Address: 1247 Jimmie Kerr Road Graham, NC 27253 Jennifer [email protected] 336-506-4375 Mock Mailing Address: PO Box 8000 Graham, NC 27253 Asheville-Buncombe TCC Rebecca Physical Address: 340 Victoria Road [email protected] 828-398-7207 Loli Asheville, NC 28801 Beaufort County CC Penelope Physical Address: 5337 Hwy. 264E [email protected] 252-940-6298 Radcliffe Washington, NC 27889 Bladen CC Physical Address: 7418 Hwy. 41W Dublin, NC 28332 Travis [email protected] 910-879-5587 Locklear Mailing Address: PO Box 266 Dublin, NC 28332 Blue Ridge CC Robin Physical Address: 180 West Campus Drive [email protected] 828-694-1746 Paulison Flat Rock, NC 28731 Brunswick CC Physical Address: 50 College Road Bolivia, NC 28422 DeRee [email protected] 910-755-7386 Jackson Mailing Address: PO Box 30 Supply, NC 28462 Burke County Literacy Council Browning Physical Address: 200 N. King Street [email protected] 828-437-7477 Rochefort Morganton, NC 28655 Caldwell CC/TI Lauri Physical Address: 2855 Hickory Blvd. [email protected] 828-726-2207 Stilwell Hudson, NC 28638 Cape Fear CC Mike Physical Address: 411 N Front Street [email protected] 910-362-7183 Ammons Wilmington, NC 28401 Revised: 4/2021 by jrh College and Career Readiness Program Providers Contact List FY 2020-2021 Provider Director E-mail Phone Ext. Cape Fear Literacy Council Yasmin Physical Address: 1012 S 17th Street [email protected] 910-251-0911 Tomkinson Wilmington, NC 28401 Carteret CC Diane Physical Address: 3505 Arendell Street [email protected] 252-222-6211 Matlock Morehead City, NC 28557 Catawba Valley CC Chanell Physical Address: 2550 Hwy 70 SE [email protected] 828-327-7000 4352 Morello Hickory, NC 28602 Central Carolina CC Sandra Physical Address: 1105 Kelly Drive [email protected] 919-545-8666 Thompson Sanford, NC 27330 Central Piedmont CC Physical Address: 1201 Elizabeth Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterkeeper Camp Was Developed By
    CCAAPPEE FFEEAARR RRI IVVEERR WWAATTCCHH WWAATTEERRKKEEEE PPEERR CCAAMMPP BBeeccoommee aa SScciieennttiisstt aann dd MMoonniittoorr tthhee RRiivveerr An Environmental Education Camp on Watersheds, Water Q uality and Science ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Cape Fear River Watch Waterkeeper Camp was developed by: Kay Lynn Plummer‐Hernandez Education Specialist Cape Fear River Watch, Inc. Roger Shew, Prof. Department of Geography and Geology University of North Carolina Wilmington Jana Sprenger, PhD Cape Fear River Watch (intern) We wish to thank the following people for their contributions to this document: Kemp Burdette Cape Fear RIVERKEEPER® Photographs Alan Cradick, Jana Sprenger, Roger Shew We also wish to thank the other sources cited in this project. Waterkeeper Camp 1 CAPE FEAR RIVER WATCH WATERKEEPER CAMP The Waterkeeper Camp is a project of Cape Fear River Watch, Inc. (CFRW), a non-profit environmental organization based in Wilmington. CFRW has been working to protect and improve the water quality of the Cape Fear River Basin since 1993. The organization is a member of the Waterkeeper Alliance. In addition to supporting the work of the Cape Fear Riverkeeper®, CFRW offers a variety of Environmental Education, Action and Advocacy programs for all residents of the Cape Fear River watershed. The Waterkeeper Camp is tailored to children and young adults between the ages of 13 to 17 years. It is designed to enable students to better understand the connections between people and their natural and urban environment by looking at rivers, watersheds, water quality and usage. The camp combines learning about our watershed and scientific research methods with fun recreational activities like paddling. Students will learn how they can become an excellent steward of the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Flood Resilience in Eastern North Carolina
    PROJECT BRIEF February 2020 STRENGTHENING FLOOD RESILIENCE IN EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Lead Faculty Researcher: Dr. Mike Piehler, Director, UNC Institute for the Environment BACKGROUND With three major hurricanes (Matthew, Florence, and Dorian) hitting the State of North Carolina in three of the past four years, there is a new urgency to strengthen the state’s resiliency to future storms, especially in eastern North Carolina. Combined these storms, and in particular the flooding, decimated the state resulting in dozens of deaths, damage to thousands of structures, and billions of dollars in economic loss. In 2019 the North Carolina General Assembly approved disaster recovery legislation (Senate bill 429, Session Law 2019-224), one section of which directed $2 million to be used by the North Carolina Policy Collaboratory to study flooding and resiliency. Specifically, the legislation charged the Collaboratory to study flooding and resiliency against future storms in eastern North Carolina and develop an implementation plan with recommendations. Observed precipitation from Hurricane Florence. Map via the National Weather Service. 1 Pursuant to the legislation the Collaboratory is coordinating a diverse team of university researchers to address flooding and resiliency issues in a comprehensive manner. The study includes five overarching focal areas: • Floodplain buyouts • Infrastructure, such as water treatment plants and the electric grid • Financial risk, including new flood mapping and a financial analysis of at-risk structures • Natural systems, including wetlands and stormwater; and • Public Health The Collaboratory is charged with delivering a final report to the North Carolina General Assembly’s Joint Legislative Emergency Management Oversight Committee no later than December 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Fear River Basin Action Plan for Migratory Fish
    Cape Fear River Basin Action Plan for Migratory Fish e Fe ap ar C R p i i v e h r s developed by P r a r t n e April 2013 The Cape Fear River Partnership The Cape Fear River Partnership was formed in 2011 with a vision of a healthy Cape Fear River for fish and people. The partnership's mission is to restore and demonstrate the value of robust, productive, and self-sustaining stocks of migratory fish in the Cape Fear River. Building on the momentum of the newly constructed fish passage at Lock & Dam #1, this partnership of key federal, state, local, academic, and other organizations in the region is working together on this multi-year action plan. Using a broad range of tools and capabilities, we seek to provide long-term, habitat-based solutions for the most pressing challenges for migratory fish. The partnership strives to measure achievement of our mission with the following targets: increased fish populations (as measured by catch-per-unit efforts, improved age structure, and other techniques), increased recreational fishing success for shad, striped bass, and river herring (as measured by creel surveys), and a re-opened striped bass and river herring harvest in the Cape Fear River. The following organizations are members of the Cape Fear River Partnership: American Rivers (AR) Atlantic Coastal Fish Habitat Partnership (ACFHP) Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) Cape Fear River Assembly Cape Fear River Watch (CFRW) City of Wilmington Dial Cordy and Associates Inc. (DC&A) Eagles Island Coalition Fayetteville Public Works Commission
    [Show full text]