286 Genus Eicochrysops Bethune-Baker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

286 Genus Eicochrysops Bethune-Baker AFROTROPICAL BUTTERFLIES. MARK C. WILLIAMS. http://www.lepsocafrica.org/?p=publications&s=atb Updated 13 July 2021 Genus Eicochrysops Bethune-Baker, 1924 Ash Blues Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 14: 132 (130-135). Type-species: Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, by original designation. The genus Eicochrysops belongs to the Family Lycaenidae Leach, 1815; Subfamily Polyommatinae Swainson, 1827; Tribe Polyommatini Swainson, 1827; Subtribe incertae sedis. The other genera in the Subtribe incertae sedis in the Afrotropical Region are Cupidopsis, Pseudonacaduba, Catochrysops, Lampides, Uranothauma, Cacyreus, Harpendyreus, Leptotes, Cyclyrius, Tuxentius, Tarucus, Zintha, Zizeeria, Actizera, Zizula, Zizula, Brephidium, Oraidium, Azanus, Euchrysops, Orachrysops, Lepidochrysops, Thermoniphas and Oboronia. Eicochrysops (Ash Blues) is a purely Afrotropical genus containing 15 species. *Eicochrysops antoto (Strand, 1911) Cupido antoto Strand, 1911. Entomologische Rundschau 28: 138 (137-141). Eicochrysops antoto Strand, 1911. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: [Ethiopia]: “Umgebung unterhalb Antotos”. Distribution: Ethiopia. Specific localities: Ethiopia – Antotos (TL). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1995 Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1993 and 1995. Lambillionea 93 (4) (Tome I): 361 (345-361) and Lambillionea 95 (2) (Tome I): 201 (197-210). Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1995. d’Abrera, 2009: 819. Type locality: Comoro Islands. Distribution: Comoro Islands. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops distractus (de Joannis & Verity, 1913) Catochrysops distractus de Joannis & Verity, 1913. Bollettino della Sociète Entomologica Italiana 44: 118 (115-122). Eicochrysops distractus de Joannis & Verity, 1913. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: [Ethiopia]: “Eritrea”. Distribution: Ethiopia, Uganda (north), Kenya, Tanzania (north), Yemen (Bálint, 1999: 307). 1 Specific localities: Ethiopia – Toke (Ungemach, 1932). Tanzania – Mount Longido, 2 000 m (Kielland, 1990d; a pair). Habitat: Montane forest in Tanzania (Kielland, 1990d). Habits: Both sexes have been found on damp sand (Kielland, 1990d). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. Note: Larsen (1991c: 242) regards distractus as, at most, a subspecies of Eicochrysops masai (Bethune-Baker, 1905). He does not, however, formally change its status. pusillus Ungemach, 1932 (as sp. of Catochrysops). Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles (et Physiques) du Maroc 32: 94 (1-122). [Ethiopia]: “Toké”. Given as a good species in Ackery et al., 1995, but formally synonymised with Eicochrysops distractus de Joannis & Verity, 1913 by Kuhne, 2000 (Entomofauna 21 (17): 223 (213-226)). Treated as a valid species by d’Abrera (2009: 818), without reference to the treatment accorded pusillus by Kuhne (2000: 223). *Eicochrysops dudgeoni Riley, 1929 Dudgeon’s Cupid Eicochrysops dudgeoni Riley, 1929. In: Eltringham et al., 1929. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 77: 497 (475-504). Eicochrysops dudgeoni Riley, 1929. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: Nigeria: “Zaria province”. Distribution: Guinea (Nimba Mountains), Sierra Leone, Ghana, Benin (north), Nigeria (north), Cameroon (north). Specific localities: Ghana – Kyabobo National Park (Larsen, 2005a); Mole National Park (Larsen, 2005a). Benin – see Coache et al. (2017). Nigeria – Zaria (TL); Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria (Larsen, 2005a); Anara Forest Reserve (S. Norman, vide Larsen, 2005a). Cameroon – Yola (Larsen, 2005a). Habitat: Guinea savanna (Larsen, 2005a). Habits: Occurs in localized colonies, but may be numerous where it occurs (Larsen, 2005a). Males often mud-puddle and both sexes come to flowers (Larsen, 2005a). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, 1924 Brachystegia Blue Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, 1924. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 14: 132 (130-135). Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, 1924. Pringle et al., 1994: 274. Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, 1924. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. 2 Eicochrysops eicotrochilus. Male. Left – upperside; right – underside. Kataba, Western Province, Zambia. 10 April 2004. A. Gardiner. Images M.C. Williams ex Gardiner Collection. Eicochrysops eicotrochilus. Female. Left – upperside; right – underside. Kataba, Western Province, Zambia. 9 January 2004. A. Gardiner. Images M.C. Williams ex Gardiner Collection. Type locality: [Zambia]: “Fort Jameson”; [Tanzania]: “Ndarugu”; [Zimbabwe]: “Salisbury, Mashonaland”. Distribution: Angola, Democratic Republic of Congo (South Kivu, Shaba, Lualaba), Tanzania, Malawi, Zambia (widespread), Zimbabwe (Harare District). Specific localities: Tanzania – Ndarugu (Bethune-Baker, 1924); Sandstone Ridge in Mpanda (Kielland, 1990d); Chala Mountain in Ufipa (Kielland, 1990d); Bisi Mountain in Ufipa (Kielland, 1990d). Malawi – Nyika N.P. (J. Timberlake, pers. comm., 2019). Zambia – Fort Jameson (TL); Lusaka (Heath et al., 2002); Chalimbana (Heath et al., 2002); Mpongwe (Heath et al., 2002); Ndola (Heath et al., 2002); Mufulira (Heath et al., 2002); Mafinga Mountains (Heath et al., 2002); Nyika (Heath et al., 2002). Zimbabwe – Harare (Bethune-Baker, 1924 – Marshall); Manyome (=Hunyani) River, 20 km south of Harare (Pringle et al., 1994). Habitat: Brachystegia woodland (Pringle et al., 1994). Montane grassland from 1 700 to 2 000 m in Tanzania (Kielland, 1990d). Habits: Flies feebly through the grass (Pringle et al., 1994). Individuals often settle on the ground (Kielland, 1990d). Flight period: October to February (Pringle et al., 1994). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops fontainei Stempffer, 1961 Eicochrysops fontainei Stempffer, 1961. Annales Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale (8) 94: 68 (73 pp.). Eicochrysops fontainei Stempffer, 1961. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: [Democratic Republic of Congo]: “Binza, Léopoldville”. Distribution: Democratic Republic of Congo. Known only from the type locality. Specific localities: Democratic Republic of Congo – Binza, Leopoldville (TL). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops hippocrates (Fabricius, 1793)# 3 White-tipped Blue White-tipped Blue (Eicochrysops hippocrates) male upper- and underside Images courtesy Steve Woodhall Hesperia hippocrates Fabricius, 1793. Entomologia Systematica emendata et aucta 3 (1): 288 (488 pp.). Lycaena hippocrates (Fabricius, 1793). Trimen & Bowker, 1887b. Eichochrysops hippocrates Fabricius. Swanepoel, 1953a. Eicochrysops hippocrates (Fabricius, 1793). Dickson & Kroon, 1978. Eicochrysops hippocrates (Fabricius, 1793). Pringle et al., 1994: 274. Eicochrysops hippocrates Fabricius, 1793. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Eicochrysops hippocrates. Male (Wingspan 22 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Mphaphuli Nature Reserve, Limpopo, South Africa. 18 June 2005. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Eicochrysops hippocrates. Female (Wingspan 22 mm). Left – upperside; right – underside. Mphaphuli Nature Reserve, Limpopo, South Africa. 18 June 2005. J. Dobson. Images M.C. Williams ex Dobson Collection. Alternative common name: White-tipped Cupid. Type locality: [South Africa]: “Habitat in India”. [False locality.] Distribution: Sub-Saharan Africa, including Senegal, Gambia, Guinea-Bissau (Mendes et al., 2008), Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Ghana, Togo, Benin (south, central), Nigeria (south and Cross River loop), Cameroon, Gabon, Angola (Gardiner, 2004), Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Zambia, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana (north), Namibia (Caprivi), 4 South Africa (Limpopo Province, Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape Province), Swaziland. Also in Madagascar. In South Africa its distribution covers 76 quarter degree squares (486 records) [see http://vmus.adu.org.za]. It is regarded as widespread. Specific localities: Senegal – Niokolo-Koba (Larsen, 2005a). Gambia – Fajara, Pirang, Brufut, Kartong, Abuko, Marakissa, Basse (Jon Baker, pers. comm., May 2020). Guinea – Ziama (Safian et al., 2020). Liberia – Wologizi (Safian et al., 2020). Ghana – Bobiri Butterfly Sanctuary (Larsen et al., 2007); Boabeng-Fiema Monkey Sanctuary (Larsen et al., 2009). Benin – Houeyogbe Forest (Coache & Rainon, 2016); see Coache et al. (2017). Cameroon – Korup (Larsen, 2005a). Gabon – Probably throughout (Vande weghe, 2010). Democratic Republic of Congo – Ituri Forest (Ducarme, 2018); Semuliki Valley (Ducarme, 2018); Central Forest Block (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Mitumba (Ducarme, 2018); Mt Blue (Ducarme, 2018). Uganda – Semuliki N.P. (Davenport & Howard, 1996). Kenya – Widespread (Larsen, 1991c). Tanzania – Widespread (Kielland, 1990d); Pemba Island (Kielland, 1990d); Moshi (Cordeiro, 1995); Katavi National Park (Fitzherbert et al., 2006). Malawi – Mt Mulanje (Congdon et al., 2010). Zambia – Widespread (Heath et al., 2002); Ikelenge (Heath et al., 2002); Victoria Falls (Heath et al., 2002); Lusaka (Heath et al., 2002); Mufulira (Heath et al., 2002). Mozambique – Mt Namuli (Congdon et al., 2010); Mt Mecula [-12.0772 37.6297] (Congdon & Bayliss, 2013); Mt Yao [-12.4432 36.5114] (Congdon & Bayliss, 2013). Botswana – Shakawe-Sepupa area (Larsen, 1991); Chobe River, from Serondela to Kazungula (Larsen, 1991); Moremi (R. Vane-Wright vide Larsen, 1991); Maun (Larsen, 1991); Kolobeng River near Gaborone (Larsen, 1991). Limpopo Province – Letaba (Swanepoel, 1953);
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Fire Frequency on Savanna Butterfly Diversity and Composition: a Preliminary Study
    KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science ISSN: (Online) 2071-0771, (Print) 0075-6458 Page 1 of 9 Original Research Effects of fire frequency on savanna butterfly diversity and composition: A preliminary study Authors: Fire plays a major role in many biomes, is widely used as a management tool and is likely to be 1,2 Elie Gaget affected by climate change. For effective conservation management, it is essential to understand Catherine L. Parr3,4,5 Clélia Sirami1,6,7 how fire regimes affect different taxa, yet responses of invertebrates are particularly poorly documented. We tested how different fire frequencies influence savanna butterfly diversity Affiliations: and composition by using a long-term savanna fire experiment initiated in 1954 in the Kruger 1 Centre d’Ecologie National Park (South Africa). We compared butterfly abundance, species richness and Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France community composition across three fire frequencies: high (burnt annually), medium (burnt triennially) and low (burnt twice in 60 years). Plots with high fire frequency hosted higher 2Department of Biology, abundance than medium- or low-frequency plots. Fire frequencies did not affect species University of Turku, Turku, richness, but they led to distinct communities of butterflies. Our findings suggest that, in view Finland of the three fire frequencies tested, a spatial diversity of fire frequencies may increase butterfly diversity at the landscape level in wet savannas. Managers may need to promote a greater 3Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, School diversity of fire frequencies by increasing fire frequency in some areas to provide habitat for of Environmental Sciences, species requiring high fire frequency, and by decreasing fire frequency in a large proportion of University of Liverpool, the landscape to provide fire refuges.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Note Samba: the Biogeographical History of the Relict Brazilian Butterfly
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2015) ORIGINAL One-note samba: the biogeographical ARTICLE history of the relict Brazilian butterfly Elkalyce cogina Gerard Talavera1,2,3*, Lucas A. Kaminski1,4, Andre V. L. Freitas4 and Roger Vila1 1Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC- ABSTRACT Universitat Pompeu Fabra), 08003 Barcelona, Aim Biogeographically puzzling taxa represent an opportunity to understand Spain, 2Department of Organismic and the processes that have shaped current species distributions. The systematic Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, placement and biogeographical history of Elkalyce cogina, a small lycaenid but- Cambridge, MA 02138, USA, 3Faculty of terfly endemic to Brazil and neighbouring Argentina, are long-standing puzzles. Biology and Soil Science, St Petersburg State We use molecular tools and novel biogeographical and life history data to clar- University, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia, ify the taxonomy and distribution of this butterfly. 4 Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto Location South America, with emphasis on the Atlantic Rain Forest and Cer- de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de rado biomes (Brazil and Argentina). Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil Methods We gathered a data set of 71 Polyommatini (Lycaenidae) samples, including representatives of all described subtribes and/or sections. Among these, we contributed new sequences for E. cogina and four additional relevant taxa in the target subtribes Everina, Lycaenopsina and Polyommatina. We inferred a molecular phylogeny based on three mitochondrial genes and four nuclear markers to assess the systematic position and time of divergence of E. cogina. Ancestral geographical ranges were estimated with the R package BioGeoBEARS. To investigate heterogeneity in clade diversification rates, we used Bayesian analysis of macroevolutionary mixtures (bamm).
    [Show full text]
  • Biosearch 2004 Report
    Biosearch Nyika: Malawi 2004 Edited by Marianne J Overton FOREWORD Peter Overton It is ten years since the Biosearch Nyika project was first mooted and agreement with the Director of National Parks and Wildlife obtained for our exploration of the remoter parts of the Nyika National Park. Over this period the teams have focused mainly on the northern part of the park where patrolling has been very limited and our gathering of intelligence has been most helpful to the Nyika management. In 2004 we undertook the most challenging expedition to date, launched from the extreme north of the park at Uledi, a four-hour drive from Thazima. The team‟s first challenge was to cross the unbridged North Rukuru River with all their supplies. They then had to climb up the western escarpment of the Mpanda ridge to a point on the Mpero River, where they set up a Base Camp, from which to launch out on their surveys. The greatest achievement was to climb both Mpanda and Kawozya and discover the remote Bleak House, now derelict but offering stunning views over Lake Malawi and far beyond. At this point they could certainly claim to be in remote country since this old site is much talked about but very rarely seen by visitors. We have yet to have clear information about who built it, when and why. Perhaps it was a holiday „retreat‟ for Livingstonia or a staging post for missionaries who conducted business on the west of the Nyika National Park and into Zambia. In many ways this expedition was the pinnacle of logistical achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • 327 Genus Eicochrysops Bethune-Baker
    14th edition (2015). Genus Eicochrysops Bethune-Baker, 1924 Annals and Magazine of Natural History (9) 14: 132 (130-135). Type-species: Eicochrysops eicotrochilus Bethune-Baker, by original designation. A purely Afrotropical genus containing 15 species. *Eicochrysops antoto (Strand, 1911) Cupido antoto Strand, 1911. Entomologische Rundschau 28: 138 (137-141). Eicochrysops antoto Strand, 1911. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: [Ethiopia]: “Umgebung unterhalb Antotos”. Distribution: Ethiopia. Specific localities: Ethiopia – Antotos (TL). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1995 Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1993 and 1995. Lambillionea 93 (4) (Tome I): 361 (345-361) and Lambillionea 95 (2) (Tome I): 201 (197-210). Eicochrysops damiri Turlin, 1995. d’Abrera, 2009: 819. Type locality: Comoro Islands. Distribution: Comoro Islands. Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. *Eicochrysops distractus (de Joannis & Verity, 1913) Catochrysops distractus de Joannis & Verity, 1913. Bollettino della Sociète Entomologica Italiana 44: 118 (115-122). Eicochrysops distractus de Joannis & Verity, 1913. d’Abrera, 2009: 818. Type locality: [Ethiopia]: “Eritrea”. Distribution: Ethiopia, Uganda (north), Kenya, Tanzania (north), Yemen (Bálint, 1999: 307). Specific localities: Ethiopia – Toke (Ungemach, 1932). Tanzania – Mount Longido, 2 000 m (Kielland, 1990d; a pair) Habitat: Montane forest in Tanzania (Kielland, 1990d). Habits: Both sexes have been found on damp sand (Kielland, 1990d). Early stages: Nothing published. Larval food: Nothing published. Note: Larsen (1991c: 242) regards distractus as, at most, a subspecies of Eicochrysops masai (Bethune-Baker, 1905). He does not, however, formally change its status. 1 pusillus Ungemach, 1932 (as sp. of Catochrysops). Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles (et Physiques) du Maroc 32: 94 (1-122).
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹
    Insects of the Lolldaiga Hills Conservation Landscape¹ Family and scientific name² Common name² N³ L E J Threat Comments ODONATA DAMSELFLIES & DRAGONFLIES Aeshinidae Hawkers Anax imperator Blue emperor √ Gomphidae Clubtails Ictinogomphus ferox Common tigertail √ Libellulidea Perchers / Skimmers Brachythemis impartita Northern banded groundling √ Crocothemis erythraea Broad scarlet √ Orthetrum caffrum Two-striped skimmer √ Pantala flavescens Wandering glider √ MANTODEA MANTIDS Hymenopodidae Flower Mantids Phyllocrania paradoxa. Leaf mantid √ Pseudocreobotra wahlbergi Eyed-flower mantid √ Mantidae Common Mantids Sphodromantis gastrica Common green mantid / Giant mantid √ Tarachodes sp. Bark mantid √ Thespidae Hoplocoryphella sp. √ Empusidae Cone-headed Mantids Hemiempusa capensis Giant cone-headed mantid √ ORTHOPTERA GRASSHOPPERS & CRICKETS Gryllatalpidae Mole Crickets Gryllotalpa africana Mole cricket √ 1 Pyrgomorphidae Foam & Lubber Grasshoppers Phymateus viridipes Green milkweed locust √ Acrididae Short-horned Grasshoppers Acanthacris ruficornis Garden locust √ PHASMATODEA STICK INSECTS Phasmatidae Leptinia graminea Grass stick insect √ HEMIPTERA BUGS Pyrrhocoridae Cotton Stainers Dysdercus nigrofasciatus Cotton stainer √ AUCHENORRHYNCHA Cicadidae Cicadas Platypleura haglundi Orange-wing √ NEUROPTERA LACEWINGS & ANTLIONS Myrmeleontidae Antlions Cymothales spectabilis Tree-hole antlion √ Palpares sp. Dotted antlion √ COLEOPTERA BEETLES Carabidae Ground Beetles Cypholoba tenuicollis √ Tefflus kilimanus √ Staphylinidae Rove Beetles Paederus
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head 1 the AGE of BUTTERFLIES REVISITED
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Running head 2 THE AGE OF BUTTERFLIES REVISITED (AND TESTED) 3 Title 4 The Trials and Tribulations of Priors and Posteriors in Bayesian Timing of 5 Divergence Analyses: the Age of Butterflies Revisited. 6 7 Authors 8 NICOLAS CHAZOT1*, NIKLAS WAHLBERG1, ANDRÉ VICTOR LUCCI FREITAS2, 9 CHARLES MITTER3, CONRAD LABANDEIRA3,4, JAE-CHEON SOHN5, RANJIT KUMAR 10 SAHOO6, NOEMY SERAPHIM7, RIENK DE JONG8, MARIA HEIKKILÄ9 11 Affiliations 12 1Department of Biology, Lunds Universitet, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62, Lund, Sweden. 13 2Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de 14 Campinas (UNICAMP), Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Caixa postal 6109, 15 Barão Geraldo 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil. 16 3Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A. 17 4Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian 18 Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA; Department of Entomology and BEES 19 Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20741; and Key Lab of Insect 20 Evolution and Environmental Change, School of Life Sciences, Capital Normal 21 University, Beijing 100048, bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/259184; this version posted February 2, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Diversity and Silvicultural Practice in Lowland Rainforests Of
    Biodiversity and Conservation 12: 387–410, 2003. 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Butterfly diversity and silvicultural practice in lowland rainforests of Cameroon N.E. STORK1,* , D.S. SRIVASTAVA 2,3 , A.D. WATT 4 and T.B. LARSEN 5 1Cooperative Research Centre for Tropical Rainforest Ecology and Management, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia; 2Centre for Population Biology, Imperial College at Silwood Park, Ascot SL57PY, UK; 3Current address: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4; 4Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Banchory Research Station, UK;5 358 Coldharbour Lane, London SW98PL, UK; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: 161-740-421247) Received 30 May 2001; accepted in revised form 14 December 2001 Key words: Butterflies, Cameroon, Silvicultural practice, Tropical forests Abstract. Butterfly diversity and abundance were sampled across eight 1-ha silvicultural treatment plots in southern Cameroon. The plots included a cleared and unplanted farm fallow, cleared and replanted forest plots, and uncleared forest plots. The replanted plots were line-planted with Terminalia ivorensis, but differed in the degree and method of clearance. A total of 205 species of butterflies were collected over two different seasons. Several sampling methods were used, including hand collecting and baited canopy traps. Sites with the greatest degree of disturbance and lowest level of tree cover had the lowest number of individuals and species of butterflies. The farm fallow had substantially fewer individuals and species of butterflies than the other plots. The replanted plots were intermediate between the farm fallow and uncleared forest in terms of abundance, richness and composition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Systematics of Polyommatus Blue Butterflies (Lepi
    Cladistics Cladistics (2012) 1–27 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00421.x Establishing criteria for higher-level classification using molecular data: the systematics of Polyommatus blue butterflies (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) Gerard Talaveraa,b, Vladimir A. Lukhtanovc,d, Naomi E. Piercee and Roger Vilaa,* aInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marı´tim de la Barceloneta, 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; bDepartament de Gene`tica i Microbiologia, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain; cDepartment of Karyosystematics, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Science, Universitetskaya nab. 1, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia; dDepartment of Entomology, St Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7 ⁄ 9, 199034 St Petersburg, Russia; eDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Accepted 11 June 2012 Abstract Most taxonomists agree on the need to adapt current classifications to recognize monophyletic units. However, delineations between higher taxonomic units can be based on the relative ages of different lineages and ⁄or the level of morphological differentiation. In this paper, we address these issues in considering the species-rich Polyommatus section, a group of butterflies whose taxonomy has been highly controversial. We propose a taxonomy-friendly, flexible temporal scheme for higher-level classification. Using molecular data from nine markers (6666 bp) for 104 representatives of the Polyommatus section, representing all but two of the 81 described genera ⁄ subgenera and five outgroups, we obtained a complete and well resolved phylogeny for this clade. We use this to revise the systematics of the Polyommatus blues, and to define criteria that best accommodate the described genera within a phylogenetic framework.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook on the Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park
    f A HANDBOOK ON THE RARE, THREATENED & ENDEMIC SPECIES OF THE GREATER ST LUCIA WETLAND PARK A product of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species Project Combrink & Kyle June 2006 St Lucia Office: The Dredger Harbour, Private Bag x05, St Lucia 3936 Tel No. +27 35 590 1633, Fax No. +27 35 590 1602, e-mail [email protected] 2 “Suddenly, as rare things will, it vanished” Robert Browning A photograph taken in 2003 of probably the last known Bonatea lamprophylla, a recently (1976) described terrestrial orchid that was known from three small populations, all within the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park. Nothing was known on the biology or life history of this species, except that it produced spectacular flowers between September and October. This orchid might have to be reclassified in the future as extinct. Suggested citation for this product: Combrink, A.S. and Kyle, R. 2006. A Handbook on the Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park. A product of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park - Rare, Threatened & Endemic Species Project. Unpublished internal report. 191 pp. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 FOREWORD............................................................................................................................................ 6 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 7 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterflies and Skippers (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of Angola: an Updated Checklist
    Chapter 10 The Butterflies and Skippers (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) of Angola: An Updated Checklist Luís F. Mendes, A. Bivar-de-Sousa, and Mark C. Williams Abstract Presently, 792 species/subspecies of butterflies and skippers (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) are known from Angola, a country with a rich diversity of habitats, but where extensive areas remain unsurveyed and where systematic collecting pro- grammes have not been undertaken. Only three species were known from Angola in 1820. From the beginning of the twenty-first century, many new species have been described and more than 220 faunistic novelties have been assigned. As a whole, of the 792 taxa now listed for Angola, 57 species/subspecies are endemic and almost the same number are known to be near-endemics, shared by Angola and by one or another neighbouring country. The Nymphalidae are the most diverse family. The Lycaenidae and Papilionidae have the highest levels of endemism. A revised check- list with taxonomic and ecological notes is presented and the development of knowl- edge of the superfamily over time in Angola is analysed. Keywords Africa · Conservation · Ecology · Endemism · Taxonomy L. F. Mendes (*) Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Vairão, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] A. Bivar-de-Sousa Museu Nacional de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia, Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] M. C. Williams Pretoria University, Pretoria, South Africa e-mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2019 167 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of the Nimba Mountains, Liberia Report on the Butterfly Surveys
    Nimba Western Range Iron Ore Project, Liberia Biodiversity Conservation Programme 2011-2015 Butterflies of the Nimba Mountains, Liberia Report on the butterfly surveys (2013-2014) for ArcelorMittal, Liberia Photo by André Coetzer Szabolcs Sáfián VERSION DATE: DEC 2014 ArcelorMittal Liberia Ltd. P.O. Box 1275 Tubman Boulevard at 15th Street Sinkor, Monrovia Liberia T +231 77 018 056 www.arcelormittal.com Western Range Iron Ore Project, Liberia Biodiversity Conservation Programme, 2011-2015 Butterflies of the Nimba mountains, Liberia: Report on the butterfly surveys 2013-2014 for Arcelormittal Liberia Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. METHODS AND MATERIALS ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Survey areas and habitats ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Survey methods ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Faunal surveys (non-standardised methods) .......................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Butterfly monitoring (standardised methods) ........................................................................
    [Show full text]