A Detailed List of Red Data Animal Species Found Within the Project Area and Its 10Km Buffer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NYMPHALIDAE Nationally As Rare (Range Restricted)
Mecenero et al. / Metamorphosis 31(4): 1–160 134 DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/met.v31i4.6 localities for this species. This taxon thus qualifies globally under the IUCN criteria as Least Concern and is classified FAMILY: NYMPHALIDAE nationally as Rare (Range Restricted). Genus Cassionympha Dickson, 1981. Change in status from SABCA: The status has not changed from the previous assessment. Cassionympha camdeboo (Dickson, [1981]) Camdeboo Dull Brown; Kamdeboo Bosbruintjie Threats: No threats at present. Ernest L. Pringle Conservation measures and research required: No conservation actions recommended. Research is required LC into its taxonomy, life history and ecology. Better Rare – Restricted Range appreciation of its distribution and subpopulation sizes is Endemic needed. Cassionympha perissinottoi Pringle, 2013 Southern Rainforest Dull Brown; Kusbruintjie Ernest L. Pringle LC Rare – Restricted Range, Habitat Specialist Endemic Type locality: Eastern Cape province: Aberdeen. Taxonomy: There are no notable issues. Distribution: Endemic to the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, in the Aberdeen district. Habitat: Comparatively moist woodland and scrub at high altitude. Vegetation types: NKl2 Eastern Lower Karoo, NKu2 Upper Type locality: Cape Aghulas, Western Cape. Karoo Hardeveld. Taxonomy: Although there is no lack of clarity about the Assessment rationale: This is a range restricted endemic differences between this taxon and its close congeners, all species found in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa 2 records from the southern Cape for Cassionympha cassius (EOO 30 km ). There are two known subpopulations, which and C. detecta will have to be reexamined, because many are not threatened and are in remote areas. Further could represent this new species. -
Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa Landfill Site
Ecological Assessment for the Hlabisa landfill site Compiled by: Ina Venter Pr.Sci.Nat Botanical Science (400048/08) M.Sc. Botany trading as Kyllinga Consulting 53 Oakley Street, Rayton, 1001 [email protected] In association with Lukas Niemand Pr.Sci.Nat (400095/06) M.Sc. Restoration Ecology / Zoology Pachnoda Consulting 88 Rubida Street, Murryfield x1, Pretoria [email protected] i Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Uncertainties and limitations .................................................................................................. 1 2. Site .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1. Location ................................................................................................................................... 1 2.2. Site description ....................................................................................................................... 1 3. Background information ................................................................................................................. 4 3.1. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. Centres of floristic endemism ................................................................................................ -
Fish, Various Invertebrates
Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations ................................................. -
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn
SFG1897 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND WELL DRILLING, UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN KZN Public Disclosure Authorized Client: SANEDI–SACCCS Consultant: G.A. Botha (PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat) in association with specialist consultants; Brousse-James and Associates, WetRest, Jeffares & Green, S. Allan Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 900, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Council for Geoscience report: 2016-0009 June, 2016 Copyright © Council for Geoscience, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project description ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location and regional context ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 2D seismic reflection survey and well drilling; project description and technical aspects ............ 7 2.2.1 Seismic survey (vibroseis) process ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well drilling ........................................................................................................................... -
Effects of Fire Frequency on Savanna Butterfly Diversity and Composition: a Preliminary Study
KOEDOE - African Protected Area Conservation and Science ISSN: (Online) 2071-0771, (Print) 0075-6458 Page 1 of 9 Original Research Effects of fire frequency on savanna butterfly diversity and composition: A preliminary study Authors: Fire plays a major role in many biomes, is widely used as a management tool and is likely to be 1,2 Elie Gaget affected by climate change. For effective conservation management, it is essential to understand Catherine L. Parr3,4,5 Clélia Sirami1,6,7 how fire regimes affect different taxa, yet responses of invertebrates are particularly poorly documented. We tested how different fire frequencies influence savanna butterfly diversity Affiliations: and composition by using a long-term savanna fire experiment initiated in 1954 in the Kruger 1 Centre d’Ecologie National Park (South Africa). We compared butterfly abundance, species richness and Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Montpellier, France community composition across three fire frequencies: high (burnt annually), medium (burnt triennially) and low (burnt twice in 60 years). Plots with high fire frequency hosted higher 2Department of Biology, abundance than medium- or low-frequency plots. Fire frequencies did not affect species University of Turku, Turku, richness, but they led to distinct communities of butterflies. Our findings suggest that, in view Finland of the three fire frequencies tested, a spatial diversity of fire frequencies may increase butterfly diversity at the landscape level in wet savannas. Managers may need to promote a greater 3Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences, School diversity of fire frequencies by increasing fire frequency in some areas to provide habitat for of Environmental Sciences, species requiring high fire frequency, and by decreasing fire frequency in a large proportion of University of Liverpool, the landscape to provide fire refuges. -
NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists
NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE REPORT FOR HANS HOHEISEN WILDLIFE RESEARCH STATION Compiled by Ben Orban, PriSciNat. June 2013 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC. - Reg No: 16549023 / PO Box 11644, Hatfield, Pretoria. Our reference: NABRO / HHWRS/V01 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists CONTENTS 1 SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS ............................................................................... 3 2 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................ 3 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 4 LOCALITY OF STUDY AREA .................................................................................... 4 4.1 Location ................................................................................................................... 4 5 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Fencing ..................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Camps ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Buildings ................................................................................................................ -
TNP SOK 2011 Internet
GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK : THE TSITSIKAMMA SANP ARKS SECTION STATE OF KNOWLEDGE Contributors: N. Hanekom 1, R.M. Randall 1, D. Bower, A. Riley 2 and N. Kruger 1 1 SANParks Scientific Services, Garden Route (Rondevlei Office), PO Box 176, Sedgefield, 6573 2 Knysna National Lakes Area, P.O. Box 314, Knysna, 6570 Most recent update: 10 May 2012 Disclaimer This report has been produced by SANParks to summarise information available on a specific conservation area. Production of the report, in either hard copy or electronic format, does not signify that: the referenced information necessarily reflect the views and policies of SANParks; the referenced information is either correct or accurate; SANParks retains copies of the referenced documents; SANParks will provide second parties with copies of the referenced documents. This standpoint has the premise that (i) reproduction of copywrited material is illegal, (ii) copying of unpublished reports and data produced by an external scientist without the author’s permission is unethical, and (iii) dissemination of unreviewed data or draft documentation is potentially misleading and hence illogical. This report should be cited as: Hanekom N., Randall R.M., Bower, D., Riley, A. & Kruger, N. 2012. Garden Route National Park: The Tsitsikamma Section – State of Knowledge. South African National Parks. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 2. ACCOUNT OF AREA........................................................................................................2 -
Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed Expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT)
Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] GPS coordinates UTM X-0593567 & UTM Y- 9586780 PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 P.O. Box 569-80100 Mombasa Kenya 0722 493 772 [email protected] DECEMBER 2015 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page i Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page ii Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion Environmental Audit Report Submitted by MOMBASA CEMENT LIMITED P.O BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Tel 041 3434486 Email: [email protected] HASHUMUKH PATEL ....................................... -
Appendix E1 Ekland Safaris S24G Ecological Report.Pdf
SPECIALIST REPORT Ecological Assessment: The clearance of indigenous vegetation for the construction of tourism facilities on the farm Qualipan 655KT to the north of Louis Trichardt, Limpopo Province Author Danie van der Walt (M.Sc. Biol) February 2019 CELL 072 623 1845 [email protected] P.O. BOX 2980 White River 1240 Specialist Environmental & Biodiversity Assessments Biodiversity and Habitat Report Specialist declaration I, Danie van der Walt, declare that - • I act as an independent specialist in this application; • I have performed the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity; • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; • I will comply with the relevant environmental legislation, regulations and all other applicable legislation; • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in this project; • I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the authorities all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; • All the particulars furnished by me in this report are true and correct. L.D. VAN DER WALT Date: 2019-02-04 Afrika Enviro & Biology 2 Biodiversity and Habitat Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The applicant has cleared approximately 3000m² of indigenous vegetation for the construction of a tourist facility without environmental authoirization. -
Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm
MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391, KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF. NEMA/ PR/5/2/16,805 Compiled by: Philip Manyi Omenge – EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata – EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1781 J. Morumbasi Mong.oni – EIA/EA Lead ExpertReg. No. 0357 2016 Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391 KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 Compiled by P.M. Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert, Dr. G. Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expet and J.M Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Page ii Mombasa Cement Limited EIA Study Report for Proposed Wind Farm MOMBASA CEMENT LTD P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected] PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF 36 MEGAWATTS WIND FARM AT TAKAUNGU/ MAVUENI LOCATION, VIPINGO ON LAND PARCELS MN/III/291/2 AND MN/III/4391 KILIFI COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT Submitted by HASHUMUKH PATEL ................................................................................ Director Compiled by P.M. -
Faunal Impact Assessment
FAUNAL, FLORAL, WETLAND AND AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AUTHORISATION PROCESS FOR A PROPOSED COAL MINE ON THE REMAINING EXTENT OF THE FARM THE DUEL 186 MT, LIMPOPO PROVINCE Prepared for Jacana Environmentals CC May 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report authors: J.J. du Plessis C. Hooton Report reviewer(s): K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) S. van Staden (Pr Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 190011 Date: May 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 190011 - SECTION C: FAUNAL ASSESSMENT May 2019 DOCUMENT GUIDE The Document Guide below is for reference to the procedural requirements for environmental authorisation applications in accordance to GN267 of 24 March 2017, as it pertains to the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) (NEMA); No. Requirement Section in report a) Details of - (i) The specialist who prepared the report Section A: Appendix D (ii) The expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae Section A: Appendix D b) A declaration that the specialist is independent Section A: Appendix D c) An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared Section 1 cA) An indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report Section A cB) A description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed Section -
Empty Quarter Expedition Oman 2013
Empty Quarter Expedition Oman 2013 Observations in the Empty Quarter & A Rapid Biodiversity Assessment of Wadi Sayq, Dhofar Photo by Lawrence Ball Contents Abstract 2 Overview 2 Expedition Science report 2 British Exploring Society 2 Expedition location 3 Expedition Objectives 3 Anglo-Omani Collaboration and Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5 Expedition Science Overview 5 Zoogeography 6 Climate 6 The Dhofar Mountains 6 Wadi Sayq 7 Research Papers 11 1.0 Bird Observations in the Empty Quarter 11 2.0 A Camera Trap Survey in the Empty Quarter 14 3.0 A Pitfall Trap Survey in the Empty Quarter 19 4.0 Actinic Light Trap Survey in the Empty Quarter 23 5.0 Opportunistic Observations in the Empty Quarter 25 6.0 Plant Diversity in the Empty Quarter, Oman 30 7.0 Plant Diversity Assessment of the Al Hashman Oasis 32 8.0 Lithic Artefacts from the Empty Quarter 34 9.0 Evaluation of Bird Species in Wadi Sayq 40 10.0 The Status of the Mammal Fauna in Wadi Sayq, Dhofar Governorate, Oman 53 11.0 An Inventory of Herpetofauna in Wadi Sayq 61 12.0 A Rapid Assessment of Bat Species in Wadi Sayq using Echolocation Detection 70 13.0 Sherman Trapping in the Empty Quarter and Wadi Sayq 79 14.0 An Inventory of Butterfly Species from Wadi Sayq 86 15.0 An Inventory of Dragonfly Species from Wadi Sayq 93 16.0 Plant Diversity in a Dhofarian Wadi 101 17.0 Conservation Implications 105 Conclusions Photo by Lawrence108 Ball Further Reading – Online Resources 110 Abstract The Sultanate of Oman is a unique land in the Arabian Peninsula, home to mankind for millennia.