DOCSLIB.ORG

Being a Doctoral Researcher in the Leibniz Association

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Being a Doctoral Researcher in the Leibniz Association www.ssoar.info Being a Doctoral Researcher in the Leibniz Association: 2019 Leibniz PhD Network Survey Report Beadle, Brian; Do, Stefanie; El Youssoufi, Dalal; Felder, Daniel; Gorenflos López, Jacob; Jahn, Anja; Pérez-Bosch Quesada, Emilio; Rottleb, Tim; Rüter, Fabian; Schanze, Jan-Lucas; Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin; Thater, Sabine; Verrière, Antoine; Weltin, Meike Erstveröffentlichung / Primary Publication Verzeichnis, Liste, Dokumentation / list Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Beadle, B., Do, S., El Youssoufi, D., Felder, D., Gorenflos López, J., Jahn, A., ... Weltin, M. (2020). Being a Doctoral Researcher in the Leibniz Association: 2019 Leibniz PhD Network Survey Report.. https://nbn-resolving.org/ urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-69403-1 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY Lizenz (Namensnennung) zur This document is made available under a CC BY Licence Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden (Attribution). For more Information see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.de Being a Doctoral Researcher in the Leibniz Association 2019 Leibniz PhD Network Survey Report Brian Beadle, Stefanie Do, Dalal El Youssoufi, Daniel Felder, Jacob L. Gorenflos López, Anja Jahn, Emilio Pérez-Bosch Quesada, Tim Rottleb, Fabian Rüter, Jan-Lucas Schanze, Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, Sabine Thater, Antoine Verrière, Meike Weltin on behalf of the Leibniz PhD Network The authors (in alphabetical order) and their affiliation: Brian Beadle, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO) Stefanie Do, Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie (BIPS) Dalal El Youssoufi, Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP) Daniel Felder, DWI - Leibniz Institut für Interaktive Materialien (DWI) Jacob L. Gorenflos López, Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP) Anja Jahn, Leibniz-Institut für Geschichte und Kultur des östlichen Europa (GWZO) Emilio Pérez-Bosch Quesada, IHP-Leibniz-Institut für innovative Mikroelektronik Tim Rottleb, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS) Fabian Rüter, German Institute for Adult Education – Leibniz-Center for Lifelong Learning (DIE) Jan-Lucas Schanze, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Anne-Kathrin Stroppe, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences Sabine Thater, Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), University of Vienna Antoine Verriere, Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitäts- forschung Meike Weltin, Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) For queries regarding this report or the Leibniz PhD Network, please visit https://leibniz-phd.net or contact: Anja Jahn [email protected] Spokespersons of the Leibniz Jacob L. Gorenflos López gorenfl[email protected] PhD Network 2019/20 Stefanie Do [email protected] Heads of the Survey Working Group Jan-Lucas Schanze [email protected] of the Leibniz PhD Network The Leibniz PhD Network and this report received funding by: ©2020 the authors. This report is distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the Leibniz PhD Network and the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Leibniz Association or any of the Leibniz Institutes and Leibniz Re- search Museums. Final Report of the 2019 Leibniz PhD Survey 3 Contents 1 Preamble6 2 Executive summary8 2.1 Demographics.....................................8 2.2 Contracts, Payment, and Working Hours.......................8 2.3 On the implications of being paid by stipend.....................9 2.4 How gender makes a difference during the PhD...................9 2.5 How citizenship makes a difference during the PhD................. 10 2.6 How having children makes a difference during the PhD.............. 11 2.7 Satisfaction and career development......................... 11 2.8 Power Abuse..................................... 12 2.9 Mental Health..................................... 13 3 Demography of doctoral researchers and the duration of their PhD 15 3.1 Affiliation with Leibniz Sections........................... 16 3.2 Demographics..................................... 17 3.2.1 Gender.................................... 17 3.2.2 Age...................................... 18 3.2.3 Nationality.................................. 18 3.3 PhD factual and estimated total duration....................... 20 3.3.1 Time elapsed at the point of the survey................... 20 3.3.2 Expected duration of the PhD........................ 20 4 Contracts, Payment, and Working Hours 22 4.1 Type of payment................................... 22 4.1.1 Funding sources............................... 22 4.1.2 Variations across Leibniz Sections...................... 22 4.1.3 Variations across demographics....................... 23 4.1.4 Stipend funding sources........................... 23 4.2 Monthly income.................................... 24 4.2.1 Level of payment............................... 24 4.2.2 Monthly net income............................. 25 4.2.3 Income disparity and poverty......................... 26 4.2.4 Income increase over time.......................... 26 4.3 Contracts: duration and extensions.......................... 27 4.3.1 Contract duration............................... 28 4.3.2 Contract extensions.............................. 29 Final Report of the 2019 Leibniz PhD Survey 4 4.4 Vacations....................................... 30 4.4.1 Contractual number of days off....................... 30 4.4.2 Number of vacation days taken........................ 30 4.4.3 Perceived freedom to take vacations..................... 31 4.5 Working hours..................................... 31 4.5.1 Distribution of working time......................... 33 5 Satisfaction 37 5.1 Doctoral researchers’ affinity towards the Leibniz Association........... 37 5.1.1 Identification with Leibniz Association and Institutes............ 37 5.1.2 Reasons for accepting job at institute or museum.............. 38 5.2 Personal assessment of situation as doctoral researcher and motivation....... 39 5.2.1 Satisfaction with social and professional life................. 39 5.2.2 Thoughts about Not Continuing Doctorate.................. 43 5.2.3 Reasons for considering not to continue doctorate.............. 44 5.2.4 Judging aspects of career in academia.................... 46 5.3 Workload and living conditions............................ 47 5.3.1 Working on weekends or public holidays.................. 47 6 PhD Supervision 50 6.1 Satisfaction with PhD supervision.......................... 50 6.2 Employment of the first or main supervisor..................... 52 6.3 Frequency of interaction with PhD supervisor.................... 52 6.4 Rating aspects of supervision............................. 55 7 Integration 57 7.1 Support provided and needed within the Leibniz Association............ 57 7.2 Language proficiency and difficulties......................... 58 7.2.1 Is language an obstacle?........................... 60 7.2.2 Availability of important information in other languages.......... 60 7.2.3 Attendance to German language courses................... 62 7.2.4 Support from Institutes regarding German language courses........ 63 7.3 Social activities and support............................. 63 8 Career development 66 8.1 Progress of PhD.................................... 66 8.1.1 What kind of dissertation are you aiming for?................ 66 8.1.2 Required kind and number of publications to obtain PhD – cumulative dissertation.................................. 69 Final Report of the 2019 Leibniz PhD Survey 5 8.1.3 Types of published scientific output..................... 70 8.2 Support from institutes................................ 71 8.2.1 Doctoral researchers evaluation of career development offered by institutes and museums................................. 71 8.2.2 Research stay abroad............................. 71 8.3 Career perspectives and future plans......................... 72 8.3.1 Fields doctoral researchers would like to work in after completing the PhD versus the fields in which they think they will work in........... 72 8.3.2 Feeling (un)prepared for a job outside of science.............. 74 8.3.3 The geographies of Leibniz’ doctoral researchers’ future plans....... 74 9 Parenting during a PhD 76 9.1 Becoming a parent during a PhD........................... 77 9.1.1 Desire for having children.......................... 77 9.1.2 Reasons for not wanting children...................... 77 9.2 Support offered and needed for raising children................... 78 9.2.1 Support offered................................ 78 9.2.2 Support needed................................ 80 9.2.3 Satisfaction with support........................... 81 10 Mental Health 82 10.1 Mental health situation of doctoral researchers.................... 83 10.2 Socio-demographic determinants........................... 84 10.3 Workload - More time for work and less time for recreation............. 88 10.4 Supervision - Blessing or curse for mental health.................. 92 10.5 Building resilience through institutional and social support............. 94 11 Power abuse 97 11.1 Awareness of mechanisms that can help in cases of conflict with a superior..... 97 11.2 Cases of conflict: Reporting and satisfaction with consequences.......... 98 11.3 Experiencing and witnessing cases of unwanted sexualized behavior from a
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Press Release, April 9, 2019
    Press Release, April 9, 2019 Another four years funding for the Leibniz Science Campus Phosphorus Research Rostock At the beginning of April, the Leibniz Association decided to support the Leibniz Science Campus Phosphorus Research Rostock (P Campus) for another four years with a good 1.13 million euros. The P Campus, which was founded in 2015 and brings together five Leibniz institutes from the region and the University of Rostock, will thus be able to continue and expand its successful interdisciplinary research into the essential element phosphorus and its role in the environment and in economy. The Rostock P Campus is one of a total of 22 science campi with a focal theme that serve the strategic networking of Leibniz institutes with universities and other regional partners. “In the face of strong competition, the funding of a second phase of the P Campus underscores the high quality of the research carried so far as well as the worldwide outstanding position of phosphorus research in the Ros- tock area and, as a result, further strengthens the excellence profile of the university and the Leibniz institutes in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania," comments Prof. Ulrich Bathmann, speaker of the P Campus, the renewed funding commitment of the Leibniz Association. “The state government supports this with additional funding from the ministries for agriculture, the environment and consumer protection as well as for education, science and culture,” Bathmann continues. Phosphorus (P) plays an important role in the environment as an essential element for all living organisms and is also of central importance in numer- ous agricultural and industrial production processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum and Research What Makes Us Different
    MUSEUM AND RESEARCH WHAT MAKES US DIFFERENT Ships are a gateway to people and the sea Ships transport people, goods and knowledge – in fact, globalisation would be completely unimaginable without them. Ships can also be used to explore the multifaceted and ever-changing relationship between humankind and the sea and to make it something truly tangible in exhibitions. We have set ourselves this goal. In the scope of our research programme and our exhibition, we observe ships from a variety of perspectives. We explore shipbuilding and navigation from a socio-economic per- spective, discover how human knowledge is able to spread all around the world with the aid of ships and consider the impact that shipping has on our environment. www.dsm.museum/ausstellung www.dsm.museum/forschung A Leibniz Association research museum The DSM is one of eight Leibniz research museums located across Germany. The Leibniz Association research museums collect, research and inform. Their combined collections are home to way in excess of 100 million exhibits and form the basis for research into the history of the Earth and biodiversity, cultural and technological history and the conservation of our scientific and cultural heritage. With their research-based exhibitions, the museums reach THE DSM between three and four million people every year. With an indoor exhibition space spanning 8,000 m2 and www.dsm.museum/forschungsmuseen a museum harbour complete with historical ships, the German Maritime Museum / Leibniz Institute for Maritime History (DSM) is one of the largest maritime museums in the whole of Europe. One of the most famous exhibits within the museum itself is the Bremen Cog dating back to 1380, widely deemed to be the best preserved ship from the Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Dagstuhl Annual Report January - December 2008
    Dagstuhl Annual Report January - December 2008 2009 Dagstuhl Publications Dagstuhl Annual Report January-December 2008 http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2009/2075 Copyright © 2009 Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics (LCI) (Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (LZI) GmbH), 66687 Wadern, Germany Phone: +49 – 6871 – 9050, Fax: +49 – 6871 – 905133 No. of copies: 150 Web version: http://www.dagstuhl.de/files/Reports/AnnualReports/ Associates: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI, German Informatics Society), Bonn Technical University of Darmstadt Johann Wolfgang Goethe University of Frankfurt Technical University of Kaiserslautern University of Karlsruhe (TH) University of Stuttgart University of Trier Saarland University Dutch National Research Institute for Mathematics and Informatics (CWI of Amsterdam, Netherlands) French National Institute for Research in Informatics and Automatic Control (INRIA, Rocquencourt, France) Max Planck Society (MPG), represented by the Max Planck Institute for Informatics of Saarbrücken Membership: The Center is a member of the Leibniz Association and of the Competence Center for Computer Science of Saarland University Information: Schloss Dagstuhl Office Saarland University P.O. Box 15 11 50 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany Phone: +49 – 681 – 302 4396 Fax: +49 – 681 – 302 4397 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.dagstuhl.de/ Dagstuhl Annual Report January – December 2008 1 Schloss Dagstuhl Center 1.1 Stimulating Exchanges in Relaxed Surroundings .................... 7 1.2 Structure of the Center ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Museums – Places of Authenticity? (RGZM Tagungen Bd
    EDITORS’ PREFACE Museums acquire, conserve, research, communicate and exhibit according to their own defnition the her- itage of humanity (cultural heritage) as well as the environment in which it is integrated (natural heritage). The institutions see themselves as the guardians, preservers and labelling institutions of »authentic« things and thus »singled out« in many ways. With the claim of presenting original, thus »real« objects in exhibi- tions and collections, they generate the feeling of a supposedly direct encounter with the past but also with the unknown or the otherwise unreachable. In their own claim, this makes them »authentic places« like historical buildings, urban ensembles or memorial sites that appear in a similar way. All of them fulfl the widespread longing for authenticity, which seeks to connect the present with the past, one’s own self with the other, one’s own questions with scientifc knowledge in the mode of the genuine, true and real. However, whether and to what extent museums, as well as archives and similar institutions are actual places of authenticity should certainly be questioned. The contributions collected in this volume show, in a funda- mental way and using selected case studies, the different dimensions of dealing with the phenomenon of »authenticity«. Relevant aspects in collections, research, conservation, restoration, exhibition and learning in museums and in dealing with cultural heritage have been highlighted. The contributions refect the most diverse disciplinary perspectives and approaches of the authors to a topic that is of great relevance across all disciplinary boundaries and can only be researched on an interdisciplinary basis. The »types of museums« covered range from history, archaeology and natural history to science and art-museums.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA INFORMATION Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology
    MEDIA INFORMATION Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology Dummerstorf, Oktober 14, 2017 Are there sustainable solutions in dealing with dwindling phosphorus resources? Scientists in Dummerstorf set out in the European research project ERANet PEGaSus on the search After nitrogen, phosphorus is the second most important mineral and an essential building block for all living organisms in agricultural cycles, be it fodder plants, livestock or crop growing. Natural resources are shrinking and will dry up in the foreseeable future. For this reason, research has been under heavy pressure for years on the efficient use of this valuable raw material, and for some years now also the Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) in Dummerstorf as part of the Leibniz Science Campus Rostock is involved. Another major research project in this area worth 2.0 million euros and running for three years has been granted to the FBN:"ERANet PEGaSus". “For about three years now, we have been investigating intensively on making more efficient use of the limited resource phosphorus in modern livestock farming," said FBN director and project manager Prof. Klaus Wimmers. The coordination of the international project "ERANet PEGaSus" is an excellent opportunity for our institute to advance our scientific work in an interdisciplinary consortium and to extent our research as a partner in the DFG research group "P‐Fowl", which was also recently established. We are looking for sustainable solutions for the future use of phosphorus." With the world's growing population, demand for phosphorus as a fertilizer and feed additive is steadily increasing by 2‐3% per year, while the reserves of today's exploitable deposits are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Improves Returns to Public Research Funding: a Perspective from Germany
    Information Services & Use 33 (2013) 3–10 3 DOI 10.3233/ISU-130690 IOS Press Open Access improves returns to public research funding: A perspective from Germany Karl Ulrich Mayer Leibniz Association, Berlin, Germany Abstract. Open Access has become a major mechanism whereby the returns to public investment in research are maximized. Initially, the information technology revolution resulted in new dysfunctions and inequalities of scholarly communication, such as large price differences among publishers and journals; widespread usage limitations and re-use restrictions based on copyright; or systemic manipulation based on unmerited co-authorship, undue delays in peer review, and even outright fraud. Open Access mitigates or resolves these dysfunction and inequalities because (a) it provides fair returns to all stakeholders; (b) offers unlimited access and efficient usage; (c) enhances quality safeguards (i.e. transparent processes including easier detection of plagiarism and fraud); and (d) enables free sharing and re-use (e.g. CC-BY license). Keywords: Open Access, scholarly publishing, public return to investment, publication funds 1. Continuity and change in scholarly communication For centuries scholars have created knowledge, usually supported by public funding. Meanwhile, pub- lishers have played an important role in organizing the quality control and dissemination of published knowledge. The information technology revolution and the concomitant globalization of scholarship has contributed to further accelerated growth of published knowledge. Simultaneously these developments have contributed to changing roles among key stakeholders. For example, while libraries were the chief repositories of knowledge for centuries, they now are increasingly a conduit to publications held at publishers’ sites. For the past decades, I have been both a witness and participant.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Ships – Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Global Historical
    Questions about both motivation and implementation Interested audience and discussants are very of cultural exchanges are today just as topical as then. welcome. Please register your attendance by From the end of the Middle Ages onwards particularly no later than 19 December 2014. Registration sea shipping contributed to an increase in fee for non-speakers is 30, 00 € (included all transcontinental contacts: Expeditions led to the discovery of new sea routes and therefore to the coffee breaks and lunchtime snack on the development of merchant and military fleets – for second day). Sea ships – evidence for cultural commercial business and territorial claims. Various exchange in global historical perspective factors caused the sinking of many vessels. These An interdisciplinary workshop for humanities and wrecks remain largely untouched on the seabed and natural sciences left behind a historical snapshot. For scientists “closed finds” provide an optimal research base. But despite the fact that a lot of material culture of ship wrecks are known an appropriate contextualisation of these finds in aspect of reciprocal exchanges has not been done yet. Adress and contact The workshop pursues the analysis of cultural changes and daily life at sea in the Early Modern Period. It wants to promote the use of material, textual and Dr. des. Simone Kahlow pictorial evidence as well. (Post doc researcher) Short presentations concerning the following questions German Maritime Museum (Source: German Maritime Museum, Stettner Coll., II 2 VIII-G 046) provide the basis of the discussion: (Deutsches Schiffahrtsmuseum) 1. How do cultural exchanges manifest itself in Institute of the Leibniz Association sea shipping in Early Modern Times? 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume-Outcome Relationship and Minimum Volume Regulations in The
    Hentschker et al. Health Economics Review (2018) 8:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0204-8 RESEARCH Open Access Volume-outcome relationship and minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector – evidence from nationwide administrative hospital data for the years 2005–2007 Corinna Hentschker1*, Roman Mennicken2, Antonius Reifferscheid3, Jürgen Wasem3 and Ansgar Wübker4* Abstract Background: This paper analyses the volume-outcome relationship and the effects of minimum volume regulations in the German hospital sector. Methods: We use a full sample of administrative data from the unselected, complete German hospital population for the years 2005 to 2007. We apply regression methods to analyze the association between volume and hospital quality. We measure hospital quality with a binary variable, which indicates whether the patient has died in hospital. Using simulation techniques we examine the impact of the minimum volume regulations on the accessibility of hospital services. Results: We find a highly significant negative relationship between case volume and mortality for complex interventions at the pancreas and oesophagus as well as for knee replacement. For liver, kidney and stem cell transplantation as well as for CABG we could not find a strong association between volume and quality. Access to hospital care is only moderately affected by minimum volume regulations. Conclusion: The effectiveness of minimum volume regulations depends on the type of intervention. Depending on the type of intervention, quality gains can be expected at the cost of slightly decreased access to care. Keywords: Volume, Hospital quality, Mortality, Access to care JEL classification: I12, I18 Background oncology, urology and neonatology (Halm et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Dagstuhl Seminars, Shonan Meetings
    Dagstuhl Seminars, Shonan Meetings Prof. Dr. Reinhard Wilhelm Scientific Director Before Dagstuhl was Dagstuhl... Fortress 13th-18th von Sötern centuries mansion 18th century de Lasalle family mansion 19th and 20th century Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz Center for Informatics Construction and expansion 2012 1970 1761 1992-1994 Schloss Dagstuhl GmbH Shareholders •Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) •KIT Karlsruhe •Universität des Saarlandes •TU Kaiserslautern •TU Darmstadt •Max Planck Gesellschaft •Universität Trier •INRIA France •Universität Stuttgart •CWI Netherlands •Universität Frankfurt New projects What’s next? and partners 2012: 13000 overnight stays Staf expansion Institutional consolidation DBLP, new guest Coop. UTrier house Leibniz Association Creation Dagstuhl’s membership, scientific federal/state staf open-access founding funding publisher 1990 2002/2006 2004-present ACM Turing Award Winners at Dagstuhl O.-J. Dahl R. Karp M. Rabin A.C. Yao R. Rivest D. Knuth J. Hartmanis E.W. Dijkstra D. Scott R.E. Stearns A. Pnueli E.A. Emerson T. Hoare R. Milner A. Shamir F. Brooks W. Kahn P. Naur B. Lampson E.M. Clarke L. Valiant Funding Other 3% States Federal Gov. 39% 39% Funding Fees 19% Dagstuhl’s Happy Diner Problem What is the minimum number of meals so that each of n conference participants can share at least one meal with every other participant when eating at tables of at most t persons? Are there simple algorithms approaching this minimum number? – found on Sarah Holiday’s Problem Page attributed to Maurice Queyranne Scientific Program • Dagstuhl Seminars (state-of-the-art research) • Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshops (reflections about research agenda) • Summer Schools, GI-Dagstuhl Seminars, Workshops • Project Meetings, Research Visits • Publications (open-access publication of proceedings, journals) Dagstuhl Seminars •35–50 scientists (25% junior), by invitation only •3–5 days at Dagstuhl •open program where ideas and ongoing work take center stage •seminars are selected from proposals Some statistics...
    [Show full text]
  • The Leibniz Association Connects 89 Independent Re- - Manager, Librarian
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 – 1716) The Leibniz Mission Research and Cooperation Philosopher, mathematician, universal academic, political advisor, scientific The Leibniz Association connects 89 independent re- - manager, librarian. Leibniz’ fundamen- tal notion of a close combination of Leibniz Institutes conduct problem-oriented research and one associate member. The research and science-based provide scientific infrastructures of national and interna theory and practice (theoria cum praxi) search and scientific infrastructure institutes, and has is evident in the work carried out by the tional importance. They foster close collaborations with - Leibniz Association today. In fact, Leib- universities, other research institutes, and industry in- niz Institutes engage in the entire spec- services they carry out are of national importance and Germany and abroad. Leibniz researchers uphold the hig trum of activities that Leibniz himself account for a major slice of Germany’s publicly-funded hest standards of excellence in their efforts to provide rese A. Scheits (1703) of painting by Copy ©GWLB pursued at the end of the 17th century. research potential. Leibniz Institutes are involved in more- arch-based solutions to the challenges facing society today.- than 3,400 contractual collaborations with international- - History partners in academia and industry, and some 5,600 for The Leibniz Association is a network of scientifically, legal The Leibniz Association eign scientists spend time researching at Leibniz Institu ly, and financially independent research institutes and ser- tes every year, contributing their expertise to output, too.- vice facilities which all adopt an interdisciplinary approach. Research topics range from the humanities, spatial rese Germany’s federal tradition has made its mark on the way Third-party funds of approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesamtzyklus Evaluierungen Von Einrichtungen Der Leibniz
    Gesamtzyklus Evaluierungsbesuche an Leibniz-Einrichtungen Jahr des Besuchs Leibniz-Einrichtung Abkürzung Sektion der Einrichtung Senckenberg-Gesellschaft für Naturforschung - Leibniz Institution for SGN C 2020 Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Frankfurt am Main u.a. Leibniz-Institut für Neurobiologie - Zentrum für Lern- und LIN C 2020 Gedächtnisforschung, Magdeburg Heinrich-Pette-Institut - Leibniz-Institut für Experimentelle HPI C 2020 Virologie, Hamburg Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum - Leibniz-Zentrum für Diabetes- DDZ C 2020 Forschung an der Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf Institut für Zeitgeschichte München - Berlin IfZ A 2021 Deutsches Bergbau-Museum - Leibniz-Forschungsmuseum für DBM A 2021 Georessourcen, Bochum Paul-Drude-Institut, Leibniz-Institut für Festkörperelektronik im PDI D 2021 Forschungsverbund Berlin Leibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie im FMP C 2021 Forschungsverbund Berlin Germanisches Nationalmuseum - Leibniz-Forschungsmuseum für GNM A 2021 Kulturgeschichte, Nürnberg Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung PIK E 2021 Leibniz-Institut für Plasmaforschung und Technologie, Greifswald INP D 2021 Leibniz-Institut für Festkörper- und Werkstoffforschung Dresden IFW Dresden D 2021 German Institute of Global and Area Studies / Leibniz-Institut für GIGA B 2021 Globale und Regionale Studien, Hamburg Leibniz-Institut für Lebensmittel-Systembiologie an der LSB C 2021 Technischen Universität München Leibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie - HKI C 2021 Hans-Knöll-Institut, Jena Leibniz-Institut
    [Show full text]
  • Jahrbuch 2014 /Yearbook 2014 2 Inhalt Content
    Jahrbuch 2014 /Yearbook 2014 2 Inhalt Content 4/5 Vorwort/Foreword Prof. Dr.-Ing. Matthias Kleiner, Präsident der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft Prof. Dr.-Ing. Matthias Kleiner, President of the Leibniz Association 10/11 Leibniz auf dem Campus: Kooperationen mit Hochschulen/ Leibniz on Campus: Cooperating with Universities 16/17 Leibniz in Zahlen/Leibniz in Figures Institutsportraits/Short Profiles of all Leibniz Institutes 22 Sektion A – Geisteswissenschaften und Bildungsforschung Section A – Humanities and Educational Research 40 Sektion B – Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Raumwissenschaften Section B – Economics, Social Sciences, Spatial Research 58 Sektion C – Lebenswissenschaften Section C – Life Sciences 82 Sektion D – Mathematik, Natur- und Ingenieurwissenschaften Section D – Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Engineering 104 Sektion E – Umweltwissenschaften Section E – Environmental Research 114 Leibniz-Forschungsverbünde/Leibniz Research Alliances 126 Leibniz-WissenschaftsCampi/Leibniz ScienceCampi Anhang/Annex 134/135 Die Organisation der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft/ The Organisation of the Leibniz Association 136 Senat/Senate 140 Präsidium/Executive Board 142 Kontakt/Contact 144/145 Index/Index 148 Impressum/Imprint 150/152 Standorte aller Leibniz-Institute/Locations of all Leibniz Institutes 3 Liebe Leserinnen und Leser, Die Leibniz-Gemeinschaft ist die Heimat von inzwischen 89 Mitgliedsinstituten, die vielfältige erkenntnis- und anwen- dungsorientierte Grundlagenforschung betreiben und Infra- strukturen für die Forschung bereithalten. Dabei
    [Show full text]