Iirgialatiw Anarntly Wednesday, 3 June 1992
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
3203 iirgialatiw Anarntly Wednesday, 3 June 1992 THE SPEAKER (Mr Michael Barnett) took the Chair at 11.00 am, and read prayers. ROYAL COMMISSION INTO COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES OF GOVERNMENT BILL 1991 Returned Bill returned from the Council without amendment. STATEMENT - BY THE SPEAKER Town Planning (Old Brewery) Bill 1991 - InaccurateNewspaper Report THE SPEAKER (Mr Michael Barnett): I want to draw to the attention of members an item in the State edition of this morning's The West Australian which, at least in my view, contains an inaccuracy which is important enough to bring to this House. On page 6 an item headed "Speaker bars brewery Bill" appears. I have no objection to the heading, except perhaps that it could have been bettered by saying "Barnett bars brewery Bill". However, I draw the attention of members to the first paragraph, which reads - "The WA Government has moved to stifle a Bill which would ensure the demolition of the old Swan Brewery." Members of this place would be aware that there is a significant difference between the Speaker's taking an action in this place and the Government's taking an action. I do not know from where the reporters gained that impression but I want to assure all members that I discussed the matter of whether I should ban the Bill with no member of Parliament at all. I did discuss it with my administrative staff and I did look at the Constitution. It was done by me as an administrative matter and had nothing whatsoever to do with the Government, and inaccurate reporting like that does this place no good. Members: Hear, hear! PETITION - PORT KENNEDY AREA Regional Park Creation - Golf Courses or Large Scale Tourist FacilitiesDisallowance MR KIERATH (Riverton) [11.07 am]: I have a petition in the following terms - To the Speaker and Members of the Legislative Assembly of the Parliament of WA. We the undersigned residents of Western Australia urge the Parliament to protect the outstanding scientific, recreational and conservation values of the Port Kennedy area by creating a Regional Park as recommended by the Environmental Protection Authority. Furthermore we request that the Parliament refuse to allow the development of golf courses or large scale tourist facilities which could destroy the existing natural values of the Port Kennedy area. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest consideration and your petitioners as in duty bound will ever pray. The petition bears 156 signatures and I certify that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House. [See petition No 57.] PETITION - TOTALISATOR AGENCY BOARD Turnover Tax Reduction - Extra Race Meetings Requirement DR TURNBULL (Collie) [11.08 am]: I have a petition from the people in the south west of Western Australia couched in the following terms - To: The Honourable the Speaker and Members of the Legislative Assembly of Parliament of Western Australia assembled. 3204 [ASSEMBLY] We, the undersigned, request that the "turnover tax" levied by the Government on the Totalisator Agency Board of Western Australia's turnover, be reduced from 6% to 5%. We also request that a significant amount of the money from the 1%released from the tax be used as stake money to allow the racing industry (trotting and gallops) to hold extra race meetings, or increase stake money according to the needs of the codes. Extra race meetings are required to cater for country class homses because there are very significant numbers of horses, trainers and stables which are being severely discriminated against by not having any nominations accepted. Severe economic hardship is impacting bath on those directly in the industry and those servicing the industry - from stock feed merchants, veterinary officers, caterers, and others, through to the TAB itself. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest consideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. The petition bears 513 signatures and I certify that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House. [See petition No 58.] PETITION - DEEP SEWERAGE FACILITIES NEED, SWAN VIEW Talbot Road-Chapman Street-FrostStreet-Reynolds Drive MR TROY (Swan Hills) [11.10 am]: I have a petition that reads - To: The Honourable the Speaker and members of the Legislative Assembly of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled. We, the undersigned, Swan View residents bounded by Talbot Road, Chapman Street, Frost Street and Reynolds Drive hereby petition the Government and Parliament of Western Australia to provide deep sewerage facilities in our immediate area. The urban precinct we live in is presently isolated from the existing sewerage facilities in the wider suburb and septic tank systems have not proved successful due to the heavy clay sails in the area. We are all prepared to make a modest contribution towards the extension of nearby sewer mains. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest consideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. The petition bears 20 signatures and I certify- that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House. [See petition No 60.] PETITION - SAWMILL, DARDANUP Wesifi Operations Expansion Opposition MR BRADSHAW (Wellington) [11.11 am]: I present the following petition - To: The Honourable the Speaker and members of the Legislative Assembly of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled. We the undersigned residents of Paibury Fields/Copplestone and the surrounding disticts, pray that the proposal to expand the Wesfi saw mill operations from 70 000 to 400 000 cubic metres of timber per year, at its present location (lot 317 Moore Rd, Dardanup) be reconsidered. We strongly object to any further expansion on the existing site, (560 metres from the [Wednesday, 3 June 1992]120 3205 nearest residents) as it would adversely affect the residents' quality of life and property values, due to an: 1.0 insufficient buffer zone (it has been alleged that 1 000 metres has been recommended by Wesfi); 2.0 increase in daily noise levels (from 40 DBA to 45 DBA); 3.0 increase in the duration of noise (from a daily shift, to 24 hours per day, seven days per week); 4.0 increase in heavy traffic (500 trucks per day (Chappell and Lambert, January 1992, Project No 430). We support the proposal to relocate the saw mill to an appropriate site and to isolate log trucks from residential traffic, before any further expansion is permitted. This would: 1.0 allow for the provision of a generous buffer zone; 2.0 prevent any increase of noise to residents; 3.0 maintain the residents' quality of life and property values; 4.0 reduce traffic risk to residents from the calculated increase in the number of log trucks. Your petitioners therefore pray that you and the government do not allow the Wespine State Agreemnent Act to be passed before both the public and local shires have been given appropriate and satisfactory consultation. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnesc consideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. The petition bears 294 signatures and I certify that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House. [See petition No 59.] PETITION - PERTH FORESHORE COMPETIT ION John Oldham's Plan Consideration DR ALEXANDER (Perth) [11.14 am]: I present a petition in the following terms - To: The Honourable the Speaker and members of the Legislative Assembly of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled. We the undernmentioned petitioners ask that in view of the excessive cost of implementing the unrealistic and inappropriate winning plan for the Perth Foreshores that consideration be given to adopting John Oldham's plan. This plan not only preserves the foreshore's unique charm so valued by the public but also offers immediate employment by implementing the first stage, ie: The realignment of Riverside Drive to adjacent to Terrace Road and the planting of many indigenous trees to give attractive shade and shelter. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest consideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. The petition bears 58 signatures and I certify that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the Legislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House. (See petition No 61.] PETITION - STRATTON DEVELOPMENT Homeswesr Rental Acconmnodation ProposalConcern MR TROY (Swan Hills) [I11. 15 am]: I have a second petition which reads - To: The Honourable the Speaker and members of the Legislative Assembly of the Parliament of Western Australia in Parliament assembled. 3206 [ASSEMBLY] The petition of the undersigned residents of Stratton respectfully showeth that: There is concern about the proposal by Urban Concepts to have Homeswest rental accommodation developed in Stratton. Your petitioners having each purchased their respective blocks following a representation that no blocks in Stratton development would be used for the purposes of Homeswesx Rental Accommodation. Your petitioners therefore humbly pray that you will give this matter earnest cons ideration and your petitioners, as in duty bound, will ever pray. The petition bears 28 signatures and I certify that it conforms to the Standing Orders of the 1,egislative Assembly. The SPEAKER: I direct that the petition be brought to the Table of the House.