A Study of First Instar Larvae of the Saturniidae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study of First Instar Larvae of the Saturniidae JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Volume 14 1960 Number 2 A STUDY OF FIRST INSTAR LARVft OF THE SATURNIIDft, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO NEARCTIC GENERA by ROGER W. PEASE, JR. INTRODUCTION First instars of many species of Lepidoptera have been described, usually with non-comparative and non-technical descriptions. Occasionally it has been done with an eye toward interpreting structures of the mature larvre and correctly homologizing them with those of other groups. This has been singularly successful, since the first instar represents a link with the past in that primitive characters may occur in this stage which are completely modi­ fi ed after the first molt. This p<l!per will consider first instar larvre in their own right with only passing reference to other stages of development. Such concentration may seem arbitrary until an attempt is made to classify first in­ star larvre using a key constructed for mature larvre. The number and degree of structural changes taking place during the first molt require that a separate study be made of the first instar just as exclusive compaTative studies have been made of adults, pupre, and later instar larvre. The original intention was to include only the Nearctic genera of the Saturniidre, but a few species from other areas were available and since their structures suggested some interesting problems, they are included. The sub­ families represented are the Saturniinre, Hemileucinre, Citheroniinre, Rhescyn­ tidinre, and Agliinre. There are about as many systems of setal nomenclature as there have been workers in the field. Only a few have been applied to the first instar larvre of the Saturniidre. PACKARD (1905,1914), following Dy AR. used numbers to identify a few setre, numbering them from the dorso- to ventromeson. He depicted first instar larvre of many species of Saturniida~ in color and by line drawings. Unfortunately, setre are omitted from many of the color figures, and some plates do not agree with descriptions in the text (c.g., Coloradia pandora). Abdominal segments eight, nine, and ten are also sometimes con­ fused. On the other hand, the line drawings, which are Dr. PACKARD'S own, agree more closely with actual specimens. As a means to quick visual identi- 89 90 PEASE: First instar larva: Vo1.14: no .2 fication of larvee, the color figures are, of course, unsurpassed, but they should not be considered structurally complete. FRACKER (1929) constructed a key to the mature Iarvee of North American Saturniid~ using his system of Greek letters to identify setee. Char­ acters used in his key will sometimes hold for the first instar. Particularly important are the relationships of the most dorsal set~ on segments eight and nine of the abdomen. In the following discussion the setal nomenclature of GERASIMOV (1935) as modified by HINTON (1947) is followed as closely as possible. The almost mathematically precise definitions of groups of setee could be a.pplied to the Satu rniidee even though this family was not included in HINTON'S paper. The notations of FRACKER, FORBES, or HEINRICH are alternate systems. For comparisons and synonymy see HINTON (1947) and PETERSON (1948). Those setee which occur throughout the Lepidoptera in the first instal' are called primary setee. Secondary setee appear in succeeding instal'S but are usually absent in the first. It is an indication of advancement in the Satur­ niidee that some of them have numerous secondary seta~ in the first instar. HINTON recognized two types of setee: long or tactile setee and microscopic or proprioceptor setee. The former are generally distributed over the body, while the latter are restricted to areas where overlapping of cuticle is likely to occur, such as at the juncture of segments. Most of the microscopic setae on specimens preserved in alcohol were not clearly visible with the resolution and magnification (150X) used. Except for a single series of aberrant H emi­ feura larvae, the microscopic setee will be omitted from this discussion. Characters such as crochets, head structures, and thoracic legs are prob­ ably as diagnostic as body setee, but they have not been so widely used and are less easily studied. Some reference will be made to the crochets on the prolegs. All structures except the most prominent may be ruined if specimens preserved in alcohol were ever allowed to dry out. The more conspicuous seteeare usually in satisfactory condition even in some of the most severely shrunken specimens. It is hoped that the key presented here will eventually be extended to include all the prominent structures of first instal' larvae. A few terms need to be redefined for use with the first instar. If a seta is referred to as PRIMITIVE, it consists of a single stiff filament rising di reetly from the body wall. Presumably, this is the ancestral form. Chalazee are extensions of cuticle bearing one to several setee. FRACKER (1929) de­ fines scolus as a "spinose projection" of the body wall, with reference to the Saturniidee. The scali of later instars, however, ,are homologous to structures in the first instar which are clearly divided into a chalaza and a seta. Here the term CHALAZA will be used for any projection on the body wall bear­ ing primary setee which are still distinguishable from secondary setee. SCOLDS will be reserved for simil,ar structures in the Saturniinee having secondary setee on the chalazee which cannot be separated from the primary setee. As a general rule, the setee of first instar larvee of Saturniidae never be­ come fused . It is the chalazae which are fused to a varying degree. For ex- 1960 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 91 ample, on the dorsomeson of the ninth abdominal segment, all Hemileucime have a single chalaza. This bears two primary setre, one from each side of the body, whose chalazre are united. Very rarely an individual larva will hav.e 'a seta split or forked, but in two individuals seen (one each of Arsenura and H emileuca), the fork occurred on only one side of the body. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SETIE The :primary setre are divided into several groups defined by their position and recurring on each segment. They are: dorsals (D 1 and D2), subdorsals (SD1 and S02), laterals (Ll and L2), subventrals (SVI and SV2), and ventral (VI). In addition there are two extra setre (XD1 and XD2) on the cervical shield of the prothoracic segment. The homologies of the setre on the tenth abdominal segment are not clear at present. The abbreviations T-l, T-2, T-3, and A-I to A-lO will be used to indicate thoracic and ab­ dominal segments numbered from anterior to posterior. When fusion of chalazc.e takes place, it occurs first within groups of setre and then between different groups. Only the letters of the setal groups will be used to describe such united structures. For example, D would refer to a structure homo­ logous to the dorsal setre (D1 and D2) and XD-SD would be a structure made up of the two SD setre combined with the two XD setre of the pro­ thoracic segment. On the cervical shield of the prothorax (T-1) there are six primary setre. In most Saturniidre four of these are represented by two large bifurcate chalazc.e or scoli on the anterior :part of the shield and two primitive setre on the posterior margin (Fig. 1). In the Saturniinre the bifurcation has disappeared, and the two scoli bear numerous secondary setre. Anthercea and A elias show increasing degrees of fusion of the bases of the two scoli, the top being plainly double in the former and single in the latter (Figs.3 and 4). On the posterior edge of the plate, two single setre rise directly from the shield without chalazre. One is usually mesocaudad of the first chalaza, and the second is about midway between the two chalazre. Dryocampa rubicunda (Fig.2) offers a chance to observe the relationships of the setre when their chalazre are reduced and almost wholly absent. The se-tre of the more dorsal anterior pair are of subequal length, while one seta of the pair below them is longer than the other. In the higher Lepidoptera, XD1 and XD2 are of equal length and are on the anterior 'Part of the cervical shield. The subdorsal group (SD1 and SD2) is below these with SD1 longer than SD2. The dorsal group (D1 and D2) forms the remaining setre, with D1 shorter and more dorsal than D2. Therefore, in the Saturniidre the more dorsal of the two anterior pairs of setre on the cervical shield will be called XD, the more lateral SD, the more dorsal of the single setre D1, and the more lateral single seta D2. D1 and 02 vary in their length relationship. Those on T-l are of nearly equal length in most Saturniidre. In Eacles imperialis D1 is bullet­ shaped and much shorter than the normally developed D2. 92 PEASE: First instal' Jarvie Vo1.14: no.2 On the meso- and metathorax (T-2 and T-3) the dorsal group is borne on a single chalaza or scolus in all Saturniidre. On the abdominal segments D 1 is antero-mesad of D2 and is usually on a chalaza. D 1 is always present on A-I to A-9 but may be fused on A-8 across the dorsomeson, in which case it is fl.anked on either side laterocaudad by D2 (Fig. IS). D2 is present on A-I to A-9 in the H emileucinre, Citheroniinre, and Rhescyntidinre but is fused on the dorsomeson of A-9 (Fig'!8).
Recommended publications
  • Correct Authorship of the Name Phalaena Ricini and the Nomenclatural Status of the Name Saturnia Canningi (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)
    PEIGLER & CALHOUN: Correct authorship of Phalaena ricini TROP. LEPID. RES., 23(1): 39-43, 2013 39 CORRECT AUTHORSHIP OF THE NAME PHALAENA RICINI AND THE NOMENCLATURAL STATUS OF THE NAME SATURNIA CANNINGI (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE) Richard S. Peigler1 and John V. Calhoun2 1Department of Biology, University of the Incarnate Word, 4301 Broadway, San Antonio, Texas 78209-6397 U.S.A. and Research Associate, McGuire Center for Lepidoptera & Biodiversity, Gainesville, Florida 32611 U.S.A. email: [email protected]; 2977 Wicks Drive, Palm Harbor, Florida 34684-4656 U.S.A. and Research Associate, McGuire Center for Lepidoptera & Biodiversity, Gainesville, Florida 32611 U.S.A. email:[email protected] Abstract - The eri silkmoth (Samia ricini) is the third most important silk producer in the world. The moth exists only in captivity, having been artificially selected from a wild progenitor, generally recognized as Samia canningi (Hutton) of the Himalayas. In the taxonomic and sericultural literature, there has been considerable confusion and inconsistency regarding the correct authorship of the name Phalaena ricini as originally described. The author of P. ricini has most often been cited as Boisduval, but other researchers have attributed authorship to Anderson, Jones, Donovan, or Hutton. The original description was located, thus revealing that P. ricini should be credited to Sir William Jones. In turn, the date of publication fixes the nameP. ricini as the senior subjective synonym for both the wild and cultivated entities, thereby forcing Saturnia canningi into synonymy. Key words: Assam, eri silk, ericulture, India, Sir William Jones, wild silk INTRODUCTION 2003) conserved the binomials of 17 species of wild animals, including Bombyx mandarina (Moore), which was eventually The eri silkmoth (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Saturniidae of 'Los Altos De Chiapas," Mexico (Lepidoptera: Bombycoidea)
    Vol. 9 No. 1 1998 BEUTELSPACHER and BALCAZAR: Saturniidae of "Los Altos de Chiapas" 19 TROPICAL LEPIDOPTERA, 9(1): 19-22 SATURNIIDAE OF 'LOS ALTOS DE CHIAPAS," MEXICO (LEPIDOPTERA: BOMBYCOIDEA) CARLOS R. BEUTELSPACHER-BAIGTS AND MANUEL BALCAZAR-LARA Coleccion Nacional de Insectos, Instituto de Biologia, UNAM, A.P. 70-153, Mexico City, 04510 DF, Mexico ABSTRACT.- A faunal study for the family Saturniidae, of "Rancho Nuevo", San Cristobal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico is presented in this paper. Thirteen species of nine genera were found in the area. The fauna is compared with those of other Mexican localities in published papers. RESUMEN.- Se estudiaron las mariposas de la familia Saturniidae, de "Rancho Nuevo", San Cristobal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, encontrandose 13 especies repartidas en nueve generos. Se compara esta fauna, con otras del pai's y se senalan los Indices de Similitud. KEY WORDS: Arsenurinae, biodiversity, Central America, Ceratocampinae, distribution, fauna, Hemileucinae, Mesoamerica, Neotropical, Saturniinae, zoogeography. This is the second of a series of papers on the Lepidoptera fauna RESULTS of "Rancho Nuevo," San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico dealing with the family Saturniidae. The description of the study area A total of 13 species of 9 genera were found in the study area, 2 is as follows (see also Beutelspacher, 1995): location is in central of which are considered endemics to the area: Syssphinx gomezi Chiapas, at 16°40'13"N and 92°33'49"W. The climate in the area is Lemaire and Coloradia casanovai Beutelspacher. The months when subhumid temperate. Warmest months are June and July, with an adult specimens of the species were collected, and their number, are average temperatue 15.5°C; the coldest months are December and pointed out in the following list.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture
    USDA United States Department Insects and Related Arthropods Associated with of Agriculture Forest Service Greenleaf Manzanita in Montane Chaparral Pacific Southwest Communities of Northeastern California Research Station General Technical Report Michael A. Valenti George T. Ferrell Alan A. Berryman PSW-GTR- 167 Publisher: Pacific Southwest Research Station Albany, California Forest Service Mailing address: U.S. Department of Agriculture PO Box 245, Berkeley CA 9470 1 -0245 Abstract Valenti, Michael A.; Ferrell, George T.; Berryman, Alan A. 1997. Insects and related arthropods associated with greenleaf manzanita in montane chaparral communities of northeastern California. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-167. Albany, CA: Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. Agriculture; 26 p. September 1997 Specimens representing 19 orders and 169 arthropod families (mostly insects) were collected from greenleaf manzanita brushfields in northeastern California and identified to species whenever possible. More than500 taxa below the family level wereinventoried, and each listing includes relative frequency of encounter, life stages collected, and dominant role in the greenleaf manzanita community. Specific host relationships are included for some predators and parasitoids. Herbivores, predators, and parasitoids comprised the majority (80 percent) of identified insects and related taxa. Retrieval Terms: Arctostaphylos patula, arthropods, California, insects, manzanita The Authors Michael A. Valenti is Forest Health Specialist, Delaware Department of Agriculture, 2320 S. DuPont Hwy, Dover, DE 19901-5515. George T. Ferrell is a retired Research Entomologist, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2400 Washington Ave., Redding, CA 96001. Alan A. Berryman is Professor of Entomology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6382. All photographs were taken by Michael A. Valenti, except for Figure 2, which was taken by Amy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Baja California Norte, Mexico
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 127-143 Nachr
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 2010 Band/Volume: 31 Autor(en)/Author(s): Naumann Stefan, Nässig Wolfgang A. Artikel/Article: Two species in Saturnia (Rinaca) zuleika Hope, 1843 (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 127-143 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 31 (3): 127–143 (2010) 127 Two species in Saturnia (Rinaca) zuleika Hope, 1843 (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) 1 2 Stefan Naumann and Wolfgang A. Nässig Dr. Stefan Naumann, Hochkirchstrasse 71, D­10829 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] Dr. Wolfgang A. Nässig, Entomologie II, Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Senckenberganlage 25, D­60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; wolfgang.naessig@ senckenberg.de Abstract: The type locality for Saturnia zuleika Hope, different populations in the group, but only hesitated to 1843 as reported in the original description (“Silhet”) is describe them at the species level. We also uncovered a evident ly erroneous; the same probably being the case for misidentified type lo ca li ty, which might also have been Salassa lola (West wood, 1847). Based on the illustration in the ori gin al de scrip tion and possible syntype material, the responsible for the hesi ta tion of earlier authors. taxon was apparently describ ed from Himalayan material Saturnia zuleika was described by Hope (1843: 132, pl. (prob ab ly from the Dar ji ling area) bearing wrong locality XI, fig. 5) stating that it came from “Silhet”. Hope’s new data. The populations from all extra­Hi ma lay an localities belong to a different spe cies, Saturnia (Ri na ca) lesoudieri species was illustrated; this drawing is reproduced here Le Moult, 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Museum of Natural History
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE Denver Museum of Natural History SERIES 3, NUMBER 3, OCTOBER 15, 1993 A REVIEW OF THE GENUS AGAPEMA (LEPIDOPTERA: SATURNIIDAE) RICHARD S. PEIGLER Department of Zoology, Denver Museum of Natural History 2001 Colorado Boulevard, Denver, Colorado 80205-5798 and ROY O. KENDALL 5598 Mt. McKinley Drive N.E. San Antonio, Texas 78251-3626 ABSTRACT — Agapema is a genus of saturniid moths ranging in Mexico and the southwestern United States. Agapema galbina, the type-species, was found to be misidenti- fied by authors during the last 21 years. John Pope collected the original type specimens in the lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, not in western Texas. Agapema platensis, spec. nov., is described from the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Four taxa in far western Texas (dyari, nom. rev.), Arizona and western Mexico (anona, stat. rev.), Baja California (pelora, stat. nov.) and northeastern Mexico (dentifasciata, stat. nov.), previously considered to he subspecies of galbina, are elevated to full species rank based on larval and genitalic dif- ferences. The female and mature larva of dentifasciata and mature larvae of dyari and platensis are described for the first time. Figures and a key to the adult moths are pro- vided. The distribution of each species is plotted on a map. All known records for host- plants and parasitoids are tabulated, and phylogeny, habitats, and other field observa- tions are discussed. KEYWORDS: Agapema, Arizona, Colorado, Condalia, galbina, Mexico, moths, par- asitoids, Rhamnaceae, Saturnia, Saturniidae, taxonomy, Texas PEIGLER AND KENDALL The genus Agapema is a holophyletic group of TAMU— Texas A&M University, College small to medium-sized nocturnal saturniid moths that Station range in southwestern North America south to the region SDNHM— San Diego Natural History Museum, of Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Edition: Moths Interview with Bart Coppens, Guest Speaker at ICBES 2017
    INTERNATIONAL ASSOCI ATION OF BUTTERFLY EXHIBITORS AND SUPPL IERS Volume 16 Number 3 MAI– JUNE 2017 Visit us on the web at www.iabes.org Special edition: moths Interview with Bart Coppens, guest speaker at ICBES 2017 Who are you? I’m Bart Coppens (24) from the Netherlands – a fervent breeder of moths and aspiring entomologist. In my home I breed over 50 species of moths (mainly Saturniidae) on yearly basis. My goal is to expand what started out as a hobby into something more scientific. It turns out the life cycle and biology of many Saturni- idae is poorly known or even unrecorded. By importing eggs and cocoons of rare and obscure species and breeding them in cap- tivity I am able to record undescribed larvae, host plants and the life history of several moth species – information that I publish on a scientific level. My ambition is also to gradually get into more difficult subjects such as the taxonomy, morphology and evolution and perhaps even the organic chemistry (in terms of defensive chemicals) of Saturniidae – but for now these subjects are still beyond my le- Bart with Graellsia isabella vel of comprehension, as relatively young person that has not yet completed a formal education. I’d also like to say I have a general passion for all kinds of Lepidoptera, from butterflies to the tiniest species of moths, I truly like all of them. The reason I mention Saturniidae so much is because I have invested most of my time and expertise into this particular family of Lepidoptera, simply because this order of insects is too big to study on a general scale, so I decided to specialise myself a little in the kinds of moths I find the most impressi- ve and fascinating myself – and was already the most familiar with due to my breeding hobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Beitrag Zur Kenntnis Der Saturniidae Und Der Brahmaeidae Des Iran Und Der Türkei (Lepidoptera) Teil 2: Saturniidae 1- 39 ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo E.V
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 1981 Band/Volume: 2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Nässig Wolfgang A. Artikel/Article: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Saturniidae und der Brahmaeidae des Iran und der Türkei (Lepidoptera) Teil 2: Saturniidae 1- 39 ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachr. ent. Ver. A pollo, Frankfurt, N. F. Bd. 2, Heft 1: 1 —39 — März 1981 1 Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Saturniidae und der Brahmaeidae des Iran und der Türkei (Lepidoptera) Teil 2: Saturniidae von WOLFGANG NÄSSIG Abstract: The geographical distribution of Aglia tau (LINNAEUS) (Lepid., Saturniidae, Agliinae), Saturnia (Saturnia) pyri (DEN. et SCHIFF.), Saturnia (Eudia) pavonia (LINNAEUS), Saturnia (Eudia) spini (DEN. et SCHIFF), Saturnia (Eudia) cephalariae R O M A N O FF,Peri- somena caecigena (KUPIDO) and Neoris spp. (Lepid., Saturniidae, Saturniinae) in Iran und Turkey is shown. Several problems of biolo­ gy, speciation, and systematics of the species are discussed. Zusammenfassung: Die geographische Verbreitung von Agüa tau (LINNAEUS) (Lepid., Saturniidae, Agliinae), Saturnia (Saturnia) pyri (DEN. et SCHIFF), Saturnia (Eudia) pavonia (LINNAEUS), Saturnia (Eudia) spini (DEN. et SCHIFF.), Saturnia (Eudia) cephalariae ROMA­ NOFF, Perisomena caecigena (KUPIDO) und Neoris spp. (Lepid., Sa­ turniidae, Saturniinae) im Iran und der Türkei wird dargestellt. Einige Probleme zur Biologie, Speziation und Systematik der behan­ delten Arten werden erörtert. Allgemeines Für die hier veröffentlichten Daten gilt im wesentlichen das gleiche, das auch schon in der Einleitung zum Teil 1, Brahmaeidae (erschienen in den Nachrichten des entomologischen Vereins Apollo, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity of Upland Arthropod Diversity to Livestock Grazing
    WFL Publisher Science and Technology Food, Agriculture & Environment Vol.1(2) : 301-307. 2003 www.world-food.net Sensitivity of upland arthropod diversity to livestock grazing, vegetation structure and landform Peter Dennis Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, Scotland, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 January 2003, accepted 30 April 2003. Abstract Livestock production extends to most non-forested, marginal, upland habitats of Britain. Of these, indigenous grasslands are stocked predominantly by sheep, stocking densities having increased in Scotland by 25% between 1975 and 1990. Conversely, the national herd of cattle in Scotland declined by 22% over the same period. The effects of grazing management on arthropod distribution and abundance is reviewed, with particular emphasis on the results of grazing experiments that have investigated the effects on arthropods of varied livestock species and stocking rates. Arthropods contribute the most species of any taxa in the uplands and are critical in upland food chains. The direction and magnitude of the response of different arthropod taxa to grazing management reflects their trophic level, life history, size and mobility, e.g., 30 % of ground and rove beetle species are more sensitive to landform than grazing manage- ment. For the arthropod taxa that are sensitive to grazing management, the effects are generally indirect, via changes in the heterogeneity of botanical composition and vegetation structure. A mosaic of contrasting botanical composition and structural heterogeneity is essential to conserve and enhance arthropod and broader wildlife diversity in the uplands. However, the landscape-scale study of mammalian herbivore-vegetation-arthropod interactions is required both to quantify the relative importance of land use (grazing management) and landform (landscape physiognomy) across the uplands and to determine the optimal grain-size of the habitat mosaic to sustain biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lepidoptera of Bucharest and Its Surroundings (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 30 Décembre Vol. LIV (2) pp. 461–512 «Grigore Antipa» 2011 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-011-0028-9 THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BUCHAREST AND ITS SURROUNDINGS (ROMANIA) LEVENTE SZÉKELY Abstract. This study presents a synthesis of the current knowledge regarding the Lepidoptera fauna of Bucharest and the surrounding areas within a distance up to 50 kilometers around the Romanian capital. Data about the fauna composition are presented: the results of the research work beginning with the end of the 19th century, as well the results of the research work carried out in the last 15 years. The research initiated and done by the author himself, led to the identification of 180 species which were unknown in the past. Even if the natural habitats from this region have undergone through radical changes in the 20th century, the area still preserves a quite rich and interesting Lepidoptera fauna. The forests provide shelter to rich populations of the hawk moth Dolbina elegans A. Bang-Haas, 1912, one of the rarest Sphingidae in Europe, and some other species with high faunistical and zoogeographical value as: Noctua haywardi (Tams, 1926) (it is new record for the Romanian fauna from this area), Catocala dilecta (Hübner, 1808), Tarachidia candefacta (Hübner, [1831]), Chrysodeixis chalcites (Esper, [1789]), Aedia leucomelas (Linnaeus, 1758), and Hecatera cappa (Hübner, [1809]). We also present and discuss the current status of the protected Lepidoptera species from the surroundings of the Romanian capital for the first time. Résumé. Ce travail représente une synthèse des connaissances actuelles concernant la faune de lépidoptères de Bucarest et de ses zones limitrophes sur un rayon de 50 km autour de la capitale de la Roumanie.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Records for Parasitism in Saturniidae (Lepidoptera)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Nachrichten des Entomologischen Vereins Apollo Jahr/Year: 1984 Band/Volume: 5 Autor(en)/Author(s): Peigler Richard S. Artikel/Article: Recent records for parasitism in Saturniidae 95-105 ©Entomologischer Verein Apollo e.V. Frankfurt am Main; download unter www.zobodat.at Nachr. ent. Ver. Apollo, Frankfurt, N. F., Bd. 5, Heft 4: 95—105 — März 1985 95 Recent records for parasitism in Saturniidae (Lepidoptera) by RICHARD S. PEIGLER Abstract: Numerous records of parasites reared from Saturniidae are given, several of which are previously unpublished host-parasite associations. Records are from several regions of the U.S.A. and Central America, with a few from Hong Kong and one from France. Parasites reported here belong to the dipterous family Tachinidae and the hymenopterous families Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Chalcididae, Perilampidae, Torymidae, Eupel- midae, and Eulophidae. Neuere Beobachtungen über Parasitismus bei Saturniidae (Lepidoptera) Zusammenfassung:Es werden verschiedene Beobachtungen über Parasiten, die aus Saturniiden gezüchtet wurden, gegeben, von denen einige bisher noch unbekannte Wirt-Parasit-Beziehungen darstellen. Die Beobachtungen stammen aus verschiedenen Regionen der USA und Zentralamerikas, einige aus Hongkong und eine aus Frankreich. Die hier genannten Parasiten gehören zu der Dipterenfamilie Tachinidae und den Hymenopterenfa- milien Ichneumonidae, Braconidae, Chalcididae, Perilampidae, Torymidae, Eupelmidae und Eulophidae. Insbesondere wird auf die Notwendigkeit, alle erreichbaren Nachweise von Parasitismus bei Schmetterlingslarven zu dokumentieren und die Parasiten von entsprechenden Fachleuten bestimmen zu lassen, hingewiesen. Sorgfäl­ tige Zuchtarbeit ist nötig, um einwandfreie Zuordnung der Parasiten zu ihrem jeweiligen Wirt zu ermöglichen; am besten eignet sich hierfür die Einzelhaltung parasitismusverdächtigter Larven.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade
    Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Sea Wall Tim Gardiner, Biodiversity Officer at the Environment Agency, Rob Pilcher, Ecology Team Leader for North West England at AECOM and Max Wade, Technical Director (Ecology) at AECOM, have a long standing interest in the ecology and management of sea wall habitats. Their handbook on sea wall biodiversity brings together a wealth of knowledge about this Cinderella habitat based on the authors’ experience of practical management and the flora and fauna of sea walls. The handbook highlights the breadth of plant and animal species living and relying on sea walls and provides practical guidance for managers of sea defences to ensure that their biodiversity value is by conserved and enhanced. Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade Rob Pilcher Gardiner, Tim Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher and Max Wade SeaWall Layout Cvr v1.indd 1 02/09/2015 15:09 SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 4 20/08/2015 15:57 Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook by Tim Gardiner, Rob Pilcher & Max Wade © Copyright First published in 2015 by RPS Images are the authors unless labelled. Designed and Printed by Mimeo Limited Units 1-3, The Ermine Centre, Hurricane Close, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE29 6XX. A CIP record is available from the British Lending Library in London. ISBN: 978-0-9546600-4-8 Citation; Gardiner, T., Pilcher, R. & Wade, M. (2015) Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook. RPS. SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 3 20/08/2015 15:57 SeaWall Layout Txt.indd 4 20/08/2015 15:57 Sea Wall Biodiversity Handbook Acknowledgements Thanks go to those involved with preparation of the case studies, to site managers and their respective organisations for allowing data to be used and for reviewing draft text of the case studies.
    [Show full text]