Gopher Peavey 1961
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
General Vertical Files Anderson Reading Room Center for Southwest Research Zimmerman Library
“A” – biographical Abiquiu, NM GUIDE TO THE GENERAL VERTICAL FILES ANDERSON READING ROOM CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST RESEARCH ZIMMERMAN LIBRARY (See UNM Archives Vertical Files http://rmoa.unm.edu/docviewer.php?docId=nmuunmverticalfiles.xml) FOLDER HEADINGS “A” – biographical Alpha folders contain clippings about various misc. individuals, artists, writers, etc, whose names begin with “A.” Alpha folders exist for most letters of the alphabet. Abbey, Edward – author Abeita, Jim – artist – Navajo Abell, Bertha M. – first Anglo born near Albuquerque Abeyta / Abeita – biographical information of people with this surname Abeyta, Tony – painter - Navajo Abiquiu, NM – General – Catholic – Christ in the Desert Monastery – Dam and Reservoir Abo Pass - history. See also Salinas National Monument Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Afghanistan War – NM – See also Iraq War Abousleman – biographical information of people with this surname Abrams, Jonathan – art collector Abreu, Margaret Silva – author: Hispanic, folklore, foods Abruzzo, Ben – balloonist. See also Ballooning, Albuquerque Balloon Fiesta Acequias – ditches (canoas, ground wáter, surface wáter, puming, water rights (See also Land Grants; Rio Grande Valley; Water; and Santa Fe - Acequia Madre) Acequias – Albuquerque, map 2005-2006 – ditch system in city Acequias – Colorado (San Luis) Ackerman, Mae N. – Masonic leader Acoma Pueblo - Sky City. See also Indian gaming. See also Pueblos – General; and Onate, Juan de Acuff, Mark – newspaper editor – NM Independent and -
Rio Chama Flow Project Hough Short in Length, the Rio Chama Is Among the Most Regulated Tstretches of River in the West
Improving River Management for People & Wildlife he Rio Chama is a river of both beauty and significance that rises in the San TJuan Mountains and flows 130 miles to its confluence with the Rio Grande. It runs through spruce and pine-clad slopes, colorful sandstone mesas and rich farming valleys. As the largest tributary in the upper Rio Grande basin, its flows have long supplied water to ancient pueblo people, traditional acequias and modern users, here and throughout the Rio Grande Valley. During the past century, the river became the subject of intensive water development. El Vado (1935), Abiquiu (1963) and Heron (1974) reservoirs captured the abundance of spring runoff to regulate water supplies throughout the year. Legal regimes have thus grown up to govern the division of the Chama’s water, transforming the river from dependency on local and natural forces to one whose flows now respond to a complex of distant administrative mandates. These institutions enforce the on-going alteration of the river’s basic, life-sustaining processes. river’s natural flow regime – its seasonality, Avolume and duration of its rise and fall over time – sustains native biodiversity and the integrity of aquatic and riparian ecosystems. Flow is the key serve to maintain today’s socio-economic benefits? process that supports a healthy river, enabling a river Could they fulfill some of the river’s unrealized to provide valuable services – clean water, flood potential, while also recovering a measure of its lost storage, groundwater recharge, abundant wildlife, values in the El Vado to Abiquiu reach? healthy riparian forests and recreation. -
Fisheries and Wildlife Research 1982
Fisheries and Wildlife Research 1982 Activities in the Divisions of Research for the Fiscal Year 1982 Edited by Paul H. Eschmeyer, Fisheries Thomas G. Scott, Wildlife Published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Printed by the U.S. Government Printing Office Denver, Colorado • 1983 •• , :e. ' • Noel Snyder, field biologist for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Condor Research Center, carries a travel case containing a California condor chick from the chick's nesting site northeast of Los Angeles. The bird was captured in August, after biologists determined that the parents were not feeding the chick regularly. The chick was taken to the San Diego Wild Animal Park to begin a captive breeding program for this critically endangered species. Dr. Phil Ensley, veterinarian for the Zoological Society of San Diego, accompanied Dr. Snyder on the capture operation. Photo by H. K. Snyder. 11 Contents Foreword ...................................................... iv Tunison Laboratory of Fish Nutrition ........ 86 Fisheries and Wildlife Research .............. 1 National Reservoir Research Program . 88 Animal Damage Control ............................ 2 East Central Reservoir Investigations . 89 Denver Wildlife Research Center ............ 2 Multi-Outlet Reservoir Studies .................. 91 Southeast Reservoir Investigations .......... 93 Environmental Contaminant Evaluation 25 White River Reservoir Studies .................... 95 Columbia National Fisheries Research Seattle National Fishery Research Laboratory .............................................. -
Map 2B: New Mexico Public Lands Highlights No Identified Conflicts
Examination of New Mexico Public Lands in regards to the Wild Horse Act (NMSA 77-18-5, 2007) 109°0'0"W 108°0'0"W 107°0'0"W 106°0'0"W 105°0'0"W 104°0'0"W 103°0'0"W 37°0'0"N 37°0'0"N Sugarite Canyon State Park 87 84 Edward Sargent Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Navajo Axtell ¤£ Rio De Los Pinos Wildlife Area Punche Valley WHA Jicarilla Raton Unknown State Land (OID 1119) ¤£64 Carracas Mesa WHA 5 Acres:160 ¤£84 Urraca Wildlife Management Area 64 Unknown State Land (OID 1116) William A. Humphries Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Jackson Lake Wildlife Management Area Aztec Acres: 477 64 ¤£ 5 87 Navajo Lake State Park ¤£285 ¤£ ¤£64 ¤£85 5Farmington Ancones SAN JUA Phase I (Unknown State Land; OID 1121) N R IVER £64 Tierra Amarilla ¤ 5 Acres: 2220 Heron Lake State Park Red River State Hatchery Elliott Barker Wildlife Management Area ¤£64 Clayton Lake State Park 25 Colfax §¨¦ ¤£64 El Vado Lake State Park Rio Chama Wildlife Management Area Tres Piedras WMA ¤£64 Jarita Mesa WHT Vallecitos Refuge (OID 1120) Cimarron Canyon State Park ¤£64 Acres: 132 Union Eagle Nest Lake State Park Clayton San Juan Rio Arriba Taos ¤£87 Colin Neblett Wildlife Management Area 5 ¤£64 ¤£87 Mesa de las Viegas WHT (Inactive) 85 ¤£ £56 C 5 ¤ H Taos A Mesa Montosa (Inactive) C O ¤£285 56 R 84 ¤£ I ¤£ V E R Coyote Creek State Park (OID 1081) Acres: 456 R IO C H A Charette Lake Fishing Area M A ¤£491 ¤£550 Circle A Ranch 36°0'0"N Mora Wagon Mound Wildlife Management Area Espanola 36°0'0"N Chicoma WHT (Inactive) 5 Unknown State Land (OID 1117) Mora Acres: 7306 5 ¤£85 Bluebird WMA -
Sanitary Disposals Alabama Through Arkansas
SANITARY DispOSAls Alabama through Arkansas Boniface Chevron Kanaitze Chevron Alaska State Parks Fool Hollow State Park ALABAMA 2801 Boniface Pkwy., Mile 13, Kenai Spur Road, Ninilchik Mile 187.3, (928) 537-3680 I-65 Welcome Center Anchorage Kenai Sterling Hwy. 1500 N. Fool Hollow Lake Road, Show Low. 1 mi. S of Ardmore on I-65 at Centennial Park Schillings Texaco Service Tundra Lodge milepost 364 $6 fee if not staying 8300 Glenn Hwy., Anchorage Willow & Kenai, Kenai Mile 1315, Alaska Hwy., Tok at campground Northbound Rest Area Fountain Chevron Bailey Power Station City Sewage Treatment N of Asheville on I-59 at 3608 Minnesota Dr., Manhole — Tongass Ave. Plant at Old Town Lyman Lake State Park milepost 165 11 mi. S of St. Johns; Anchorage near Cariana Creek, Ketchikan Valdez 1 mi. E of U.S. 666 Southbound Rest Area Garrett’s Tesoro Westside Chevron Ed Church S of Asheville on I-59 Catalina State Park 2811 Seward Hwy., 2425 Tongass Ave., Ketchikan Mile 105.5, Richardson Hwy., 12 mi. N of on U.S. 89 at milepost 168 Anchorage Valdez Tucson Charlie Brown’s Chevron Northbound Rest Area Alamo Lake State Park Indian Hills Chevron Glenn Hwy. & Evergreen Ave., Standard Oil Station 38 mi. N of & U.S. 60 S of Auburn on I-85 6470 DeBarr Rd., Anchorage Palmer Egan & Meals, Valdez Wenden at milepost 43 Burro Creek Mike’s Chevron Palmer’s City Campground Front St. at Case Ave. (Bureau of Land Management) Southbound Rest Area 832 E. Sixth Ave., Anchorage S. Denali St., Palmer Wrangell S of Auburn on I-85 57 mi. -
Chapter 4: Geographic Areas Places Matter
Chapter 4: Geographic Areas Places Matter. Across the 1.6 million acres of the Santa Fe National Forest (NF), there are diverse communities and cultures, recreation uses, and restoration needs. Compared to other National Forests, the Santa Fe NF is surrounded by very diverse landscapes as well as unusually diverse communities and cultures with roots going back hundreds and thousands of years. Nationwide not all Forest Plans use Geographic Areas (GAs), but to recognize and best manage the similarities and differences that exist across distinct landscapes on the Santa Fe NF, seven GAs have been identified. Each of the seven GAs on the Forest have different restoration needs, sustainable recreation opportunities, connections to nearby communities, and partnerships with the public. Each GA is described in the context of local communities, uses, and restoration needs. In addition, each GA is accompanied by Desired Conditions that refine broad forest-wide management direction and offer unique guidance. From West to East, the 7 Geographic Areas are: • Canadas and Nacimiento • Jemez Mesas and Canyons • North Jemez Mountains • West Sangres and Caja • Pecos River Canyon • East Sangres • Rowe Mesa and Anton Chico Geographic Areas are made up of the unique cultural identities, ecology, and types of use specific to different places on the Forest. These features may align with Ranger Districts, county lines, watersheds, or other geographical and socioeconomic boundaries. Where people travel from as they access different parts of the forest was also considered in defining boundaries. Therefore, GAs can also represent many small “community” forests within the larger Santa Fe NF. Local community culture, economic drivers, natural and man-made landscape features, ecology, types of recreation, and restoration needs shaped the GAs, which are delineated by easily recognized natural features and infrastructure (e.g., waterways, roads, and ridges). -
Cross Country 2002 Itinerary.Pdf
2002 RV Trip – The Southwest Day 1 – Drive to Belle Vernon, Pennsylvania (366 miles; 6 hours) Drive 6 hours Stay in Walmart parking lot Day 2 – Mammoth Cave (500 miles; 8 hours) Drive to Mammoth Cave National Park in Kentucky Bike the Green River Ferry Road down to river Stay at National Park Headquarters campground Attend Ranger Talk on the History of the Caves at the campground amphitheater Day 3 – Mammoth Cave Tour and Natchez Trace Parkway (250 miles; 5 hours) Take 2-hour Natural Entrance Historic Tour of Cave Drive Natchez Trace Parkway through Tennessee, Alabama, and Mississippi Stop at Meriwether Lewis gravesite Stop at Pharr Mounds – 2,000-year-old, dome-shaped burial mounds Stay at Tishomingo State Park in Mississippi Swim in pool; hike over bridge Take rowboats out on lake Day 4 – Natchez Trace / Vicksburg National Monument / Louisiana (360 miles; 7.5 hours) Continue driving Natchez Trace Parkway Tour Vicksburg National Military Park Drive to Louisiana Stay at Monroe’s Shiloh Campground Swim in campground pool and fish in campground pond Day 5 – Lake Colorado City State Park (550 miles; 10 hours) Drive to Texas Stay at Lake Colorado City State Park Swim in lake from the rocks by the campground Fish from the fishing pavilion in the campground Day 6 – Carlsbad Caverns (270 miles; 5.5 hours) Drive to White City right outside Carlsbad Caverns Stay at White City Resort RV Park Go to White City Resort Water Park Tour Carlsbad Caverns - take Natural Entrance and self-guided Big Room Tour At dusk – see bat flight at amphitheater at cave’s Natural Entrance Day 7 – Guadalupe Mountains National Park / White Sands (270 miles; 5.75 hours) Drive 45 minutes to Guadalupe Mountains National Park in Texas Stop at Pine Springs Visitor Center Hike the Devil’s Hall Trail Drive 5 more hours to Alamagorda, New Mexico © Copyright 2005 - Lorraine E. -
A Naturalist's Guide to the Great Plains
Paul A. Johnsgard A Naturalist’s Guide to the Great Plains Sites, Species, and Spectacles This book documents nearly 500 US and Canadian locations where wildlife refuges, na- ture preserves, and similar properties protect natural sites that lie within the North Amer- ican Great Plains, from Canada’s Prairie Provinces to the Texas-Mexico border. Information on site location, size, biological diversity, and the presence of especially rare or interest- ing flora and fauna are mentioned, as well as driving directions, mailing addresses, and phone numbers or internet addresses, as available. US federal sites include 11 national grasslands, 13 national parks, 16 national monuments, and more than 70 national wild- life refuges. State properties include nearly 100 state parks and wildlife management ar- eas. Also included are about 60 national and provincial parks, national wildlife areas, and migratory bird sanctuaries in Canada’s Prairie Provinces. Numerous public-access prop- erties owned by counties, towns, and private organizations, such as the Nature Conser- vancy, National Audubon Society, and other conservation and preservation groups, are also described. Introductory essays describe the geological and recent histories of each of the five mul- tistate and multiprovince regions recognized, along with some of the author’s personal memories of them. The 92,000-word text is supplemented with 7 maps and 31 drawings by the author and more than 700 references. Cover photo by Paul Johnsgard. Back cover drawing courtesy of David Routon. Zea Books ISBN: 978-1-60962-126-1 Lincoln, Nebraska doi: 10.13014/K2CF9N8T A Naturalist’s Guide to the Great Plains Sites, Species, and Spectacles Paul A. -
Robert J. Stokes, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Eastern New Mexico University Director of the Agency for Conservation Archaeology, Eastern New Mexico University
Robert J. Stokes, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Eastern New Mexico University Director of the Agency for Conservation Archaeology, Eastern New Mexico University Contact Information Department of Anthropology and Applied Archaeology, ENMU Sta. 53, 1500 S Avenue K, Portales, NM 88130 602-615-2822 (cell); 575-562-2696 (office) [email protected] Professional Background Education Dr. Stokes has 30 years of archaeological experience, including 28 years of . Ph.D., Anthropology, experience in the Southwest. He has managed and participated in projects University of Oklahoma, across all of New Mexico, Arizona, and Oklahoma, and in west Texas; Norman, 2003; Dissertation: participated in numerous projects on the Apache-Sitgreaves, Cibola, Coconino, Aspects of Land Tenure in an Coronado, Gila, Lincoln, and Tonto National Forests in Arizona and New Ancient Southwestern Mexico and from previous employment with the US Forest Service; and Farming Society in the worked on projects in North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and North Dakota. Mimbres Valley, New Mexico His various projects focused primarily on the Mogollon, Salado, and Hohokam . M.A., with honors, cultures of the Southwest, and the Southern Plains culture area of Oklahoma, Anthropology, Eastern New but he also maintains an active interest in protohistoric and historic Mexico University, Portales, archaeology, including the Spanish Colonial period. His research interests 1995; Thesis: Prehistoric include settlement pattern studies, communities and households, and cultural Settlement Patterns in the interactions along boundaries. He is currently an anthropology assistant Sapillo Creek Valley, Gila professor at Eastern New Mexico University in Portales, and teaches National Forest, New Mexico undergraduate and graduate level classes, in addition to conducting field and . -
Draft Land Management Plan
United States Department of Agriculture Santa Fe National Forest Draft Land Management Plan Rio Arriba, San Miguel, Sandoval, Santa Fe, Mora, and Los Alamos Counties, New Mexico Forest Santa Fe Southwestern Region MB-R3-10-28 Service National Forest June 2019 Cover photo: Santa Fe National Forest visitors camping under the stars in the Pecos Ranger District. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. -
New Mexico Fish Consumption Advisories February 2012
New Mexico Fish Consumption Advisories February 2012 New Mexico Department of Game & Fish New Mexico Department of Health New Mexico Environment Department Fish are nutritious and are an important part of a healthy diet. However, some fish may contain contaminants at levels that could lead to health problems. These fish consumption advisories are designed to reduce the risk of adverse health effects or health problems from eating fish caught in New Mexico waters. These advisories are based on the risk from eating contaminated fish and do not take into consideration the health benefits of eating fish. The State of New Mexico recommends eating fish that are low in contaminants. However, there are no contaminant-related health risks from activities such as catch and release fishing, swimming, boating, or camping in and around waters that have fish consumption advisories. Therefore, the State of New Mexico encourages these activities as enjoyable forms of recreation. The State of New Mexico periodically collects fish from water bodies across the State and analyzes those fish for contaminants. Based on the results of those analyses, we have developed recommendations for fish consumption (expressed in meals per month). The advisories presented here replace previously issued advisories. As new data become available, we will update these advisories. In some New Mexico fish, three particular contaminants have been detected at levels that could result in health problems from long term fish consumption, such as for weeks, months, or longer. These contaminants are mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and dichloro-diphenyl- trichloroethane (DDT). Eating fish for which there is a consumption advisory may not make you feel sick, but long term consumption of such fish could increase your risk for a variety of health problems. -
Research Portion of the New Mexico Tourism Department Presentation at the May 2012 Governor's Conference on Tourism in Taos
Research Portion of the New Mexico Tourism Department Presentation at the May 2012 Governor’s Conference on Tourism in Taos, New Mexico Tourism Department Research Overview • Fall 2011 Image study and how it influenced the New Mexico True ad campaign • Inventory of New Mexico attractions • Upcoming research – Economic Impact Analysis and ROI study Image Study: Background & Intent Background • A baseline image study was fielded by Longwoods International in Fall of 2011 to establish an understanding of New Mexico’s current image as well as the factors most important in motivating travel. • Sample Size = 1,200 travelers. Drive Market: 150 respondents each from New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado, and West Texas DMA’s. Fly Market: 150 respondents each from Dallas, Houston, Chicago, LA • The data was weighted on key demographic variables (age, gender, income, household size, market size) to ensure that the sample profile was representative of New Mexico’s travel market. Intent of this Analysis • Establish a baseline measure for future Image and ROI performance measurement. • Provide data-based guidance for the department’s creative strategy and execution via a custom analysis of the study data conducted by Katie Connolly & Associates and Jim Orr of the New Mexico Tourism Department. Source: Longwoods Int. NM Image Baseline Study, Nov. 2011; Katie Connolly & Associates, LLC custom analysis The Image Study Included a Variety of attributes, from what There is to Do, to How it Makes You Feel Exciting Popular A place everyone should visit at least once