Amendment 1114/33 Jandakot Structure Plan, Cell 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LOANCOPY Western Australian Planning Commission Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1114/33 Jandakot Structure Plan, Cell 1- Mandogalup Town of Kwinana Report on Submissions Submissions Transcript of Hearings September 2009 Perth W( stet n Australia Vt( An tic illrn lonnInfl t e = Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1114/33 Jandakot Structure Plan, Cell 1Mandogalup Report on Submissions Submissions Transcript of Hearings Town of Kwinana W,Irtn Athtro'Inn Pronn Inci ( 0{I11111 '101-1 September 2009 0 Stale of Western Australia Internet; http://wwwiwa,gov,au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission Albert Facey House, 469 Wellington Street, Perth Western Australia 6000 MRS Amendment 1114/33 Report on Submissions Submissions Transcripts File 809-2-264 Pt, 1 Published September 2009 ISBN 0 7309 9609 3 Internet: http://www.plannin9mogov.au corporateeplanninswa.gov.au Phone: (08)92647777 Fax: (08)92647566 TTY: (08)92647535 Copies of this document are available in alternative formats on application to the disability services co-ordinator. Introduction to Metropolitan Region Scheme major amendments The Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC) Is responsible for keeping the Metropolitan Region Scheme under review and initiating changes where they are seen as necessary. The Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) sets out the broad pattern of lane use for the whole Perth metropolitan region. The MRS is constantly under review to best reflect regional planning and development needs. An amendment proposal to change land use reservations and zones in the MRS is regulated by the Planning and Development Act 2005. That legislation provides for public submissions to be made on proposed amendments. For a substantial amendment, often referred to as a major amendment (made under section 41of the Act),the WAPC considersall the submissions lodged, and publishesits recommendations in a report on submissions, This report is presented to the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure and to the Governor for approval. Both Houses of Parliament must then scrutinise the amendment before it can take legal effect. In the process of making a substantial amenement lo the MRS, information is published as a public record under the following titles: Amendment report This document is available from the start of the public advertising period of the proposed amendment,Itsets out the purpose and scope of the proposal, explains why the amendment is considered necessary, and informs people how they can comment through the submission process. Environmental review report The Environmental Protection Authority must consider the environmental impact of an amendment to the MRS before it can be advertised.Should it require formal assessment, an environmental review is undertaken and made available for information and comment at the same time as the amendment report. Report on submissions The planning rationale, determination of submissions and the WAPC's recommendations for final approval of the amendment, with or without modification, is documented in this report. Submissions This document contains a reproduction of all written submissions received by the WAPC on the proposed amendment. Transcript of hearings A person who has made a written submission may also choose to appear before a hearings committee to express their views. The hearings proceedings are recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts of all hearings are reproduced in Ibis volume Contents Report on submissions Introduction 1 2 The proposed amendment 1 3 Environmental Protection Authority 2 4 Call for submissions 2 5 Submissions... ,,,,,,,, . ,,,,,, . 6 Main issues raised in submissions 3 7 Hearings 8 8 Determinations 8 9 Conclusion and recommendation ,,,,,,,,,, . ,,,,, Addendum 11 Schedule 1 Alphabetical Listing of Submissions Schedule 2 Summay of Submissions and Determinations Schedule 3 The Amendment Figure as Advertised Schedule 4 The Amendment Figure as Modified Appendix 1 List of Detail Plans as Advertised Appendix 2 List of Detail Plans as Modified Submissions Trouser' t of He Report on submissions Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1114/33 Jandakot Structure Plan, Cell 1- Mandogalup 1 Introduction At its December 2005 meeting, the Metropolitan Region Planning Committee (MRPC) acting under delegated authority from the Western Australian Planning Commission (WAPC), resolved to proceed with this amendment to the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS) In accordance with the provisions of section 41 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (previously section 33 of the Metropolitan Region Town Planning Scheme Act 1959). 2 The advertised amendment Purpose The purpose of the amendment is to rezone the area shown on figure 1, generally bounded by: Rowfey Road to the north; Anketell Road to the south; Kwinana Freeway to the cast; and other regional roads reservation to the west. in Mandogalup from the rural zone lo the urban deferred zone, This willfacilitate detailed planning of this part of Mandogalup for urban development, generally in accordance with; the Jandakot Structure Plan; the Town of Kwinana's Eastern DisIncl Residential Inlonsi 'cation Concept; the Jandakol Water Resource Management Strategy and any other water management related requirements or strategies to the satisfaction of the Water Corporation, Department of Environment and Conservation (DEC) and the Department of Water (DoW) that may be required to be incorporated into any level of structure plan; and any other relevant planning, environmental or infrastructure requirements. Background The WAPC's Jandakot Structure Plan (expected to be published mid 2007 at the time of writing) was prepared in order to coordinate and plan development of rural land on Lithe; Tdi of the Kwinana Freeway from Mandogalup and Wandi in the north to Wellard in Ituouth Areas in the structure plan area on the western side of the freeway are largely elf,trig gm, d urban, except for the Mandogalup cell. The structure plan relates to the land surroundino the southern portion of tire Jandakot public groundwater supply mound, not the locality of Jandakot. The structure plan provide- a guide to the future development of the area and management of key environmi nl it i w II includes potential development areas, road networks, major community fir iliti« 011,10° rant, and Bush Forever areas, and a neighbourhood structure. It also provid( elkson implbmontation aspects of the plan such as the NIRS amendment process, more detailed structure planning and water resource management strategies and requirements. The structure plan was subject to extensive community consultation at major stages of the process, these being identification of issues, discussion of preferred options and presentation of the preferred option prior to its adoption by the WAPC. Discussion The amendment proposal was described endillustratedinthe previously published amendment report, This amendment is one of five MRS amendments grouped together for the purpose of progressing them through the major amendments process: Amendment 1114/33, Cell 1 Mandogalup Amendment 1115/33, Cell 2Wandi Amendment 1116/33, Cell 3Ankelell Amendment 1117/33, Coll 4Casuarina Amendment 1118/33, Cell 5Welted (East) Flowev r, should the individual circumstances of a particular amendment in the group cause that amendment to be delayed, the WAPC has the option of removing it from the group. The remaining amendments in the group would then continue to be processed together, while the Issues related to the other amendment are addressed. 3 Environmental Protection Authority advice The amendment was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) in accordance with section 38 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 (previously section 33E of the Metropolitan Region Town Planning Scheme Act 7059) for advice as to whether an environmental assessment was required. After consideration of the likely environmental factors related to the amendment, the EPA decided that the overall environmental Impact of its implementation would not be severe enough to warrant assessment under the Envegnmentai Protection Act 1066, the preparation of an environmental review and the subsequent setting of formal environmental conditions. The full text of the EPA advice was published in the WAPC amendment report. 4 Call for submissions The amendment was advertised for public submissions for three months from 27 June 2006 to 29 September 2006. The amendment was made available for public inspection during ordinary business hours at: i) the Western Australian Planning Commission, Wellington Street, Perth; ii) the offices of the cities of Perth, Fremantle, Cockburn and Rockingham, and the Town of Kwinana; and Hi) the State Reference Library, Northbridge. 2 During the public inspection period, notice of the amendment was published in The West Australian and Tha Sunday Times newspapers and relevant local newspapers circulating in the locality of the amendment. 5 Submissions Twenty four submissions (including two late submissions) were received for this amendment. An alphabetical index of alt the persons and organisations who lodged submissions is at schedule 1. Eleven submissions supported or had no objection to the amendment. Six submissions objected to the amendment and seven offered neutral comments. A summary of each submission with WAPC comments and determinations is at schedule 2. A complete copy of all written submissions is also contained in this publication. Main issues raised in submissions i) Timing of development in rotation to Alcoa