DOCSLIB.ORG

Losses, and More Scrutiny, As Gamestop Plunges Again

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Losses, and More Scrutiny, As Gamestop Plunges Again February 4, 2021 Unique Monthly Visitors: 2,143,524 Link to article More losses, and more scrutiny, as GameStop plunges again Keith Gill, the bull who helped spark a stock frenzy with Reddit posts and YouTube videos, appears to be taking a break from social media “Roaring Kitty” has gone quiet. Keith Gill, the GameStop bull who helped spark a stock frenzy with his Reddit posts and YouTube videos, appears to be taking a break from social media as the state’s securities regulator looks into whether he or his former employer, MassMutual, broke any rules. The Wilmington resident told the Reddit forum WallStreetBets on Wednesday: “heads up gonna back off the daily updates for now.” As usual, he attached a screenshot of what appeared to be a brokerage summary of his GameStop holdings. It showed gains of $7.9 million, or more than 1,000 percent, and a balance of $22.4 million, with 60 percent in cash. Gill, 34, hasn’t posted on his “Roaring Kitty” YouTube channel, which has 372,000 subscribers, for a week. Following that Jan. 22 livestream, GameStop’s stock price soared from $65 to more than $480, as investors on Reddit mounted a grass-roots rally and reveled as they inflicted steep losses on hedge funds that had bet against the videogame retailer. But the Reddit rebellion against Wall Street overlords was short-lived. The stock has tumbled this week, closing Thursday at $53.50, a one-day decline of 42 percent. Even as the air rushes out of the GameStop bubble, regulators are trying to piece together what happened — and whether any securities laws were violated. Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin said Thursday that he was looking into Gill’s role at MassMutual, the Springfield financial services company where until last week he worked as a director of financial wellness education. According to an archived page on MassMutual’s website, Gill generated rbb Comunications February 4, 2021 Unique Monthly Visitors: 2,143,524 content for its In Good Company initiative, which provides financial “know-how” to employees of corporate clients. Gill holds licenses to sell most kinds of investments and offer advice, and as a registered broker-dealer agent, he was required to tell his employer about outside business activities. A key question is whether his promotion of GameStop on social media rose to the level of outside investment work or was merely a hobby. Galvin said his office sent an “extensive records request” to MassMutual last Friday, with questions about Gill’s responsibilities and the company’s policies and processes for supervising registered brokers, including its social media rules. He said the company responded on Monday, explaining that Gill had given notice on Jan. 21, and his last day of employment was a week later. Galvin said MassMutual also told him it had denied Gill’s request when he joined the company for permission to manage investments for a family friend. “This is not about him. It’s about the bigger issues here — transparency and the adequacy of the licensing process,” said Galvin, whose letter to MassMutual was first reported by The New York Times. MassMutual declined to comment. Gill didn’t respond to e-mails and voicemails from the Globe. MassMutual told Galvin that had it been aware of Gill’s social media commentaries on GameStop, he would have been told to stop, or perhaps have been fired. Gill had an obligation to inform his employer, even if he believed his GameStop hype was a personal activity, said Nicholas Stuller, founder of MyPerfectFinancialAdvisor, which matches investors and advisers, and a former executive at a compliance consulting firm. “Mr. Gill knew better than to not disclose his activity to MassMutual, even if his Reddit activity could be argued as a hobby and not a job,” Stuller said. “Just plain old-fashioned common sense from someone as sophisticated as he would dictate he ask MassMutual if this was acceptable.” And MassMutual had a responsibility to make sure Gill was following the rules, said Bao Nguyen, a principal at Kaufman Rossin who specializes in assessing compliance risks for broker-dealers. “If he’s on Reddit or YouTube . they should be supervising that kind of activity,” Nguyen said. “There are very few firms out there that allow their representative to tout a particular security.” As GameStop’s stock plunged Thursday, the mood darkened on WallStreetBets, where posters earlier had gleefully been urging each other to “hold on” and push the stock, which trades with the ticker symbol GME, “to the moon.” “This was a ride, but we also have to be able to trust each other without spending all day propping each other up via reddit comments,” posted a member using the name “gandergood.” “I need to spend more time elsewhere. I’ll monitor the GME stock price (probably still more than I should), but for now I’ve gotta check out from reddit during the day.” Still, gandergood wasn’t giving up. rbb Comunications February 4, 2021 Unique Monthly Visitors: 2,143,524 “For those who remain on here, refreshing on a minute-by-minute basis, just know that decreased comments/activity does NOT necessarily mean people are selling . I may be MIA, but I’m still f****** HOLDING.” rbb Comunications .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • YOLO Trading: Riding with the Herd During the Gamestop Episode
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lyócsa, Štefan; Baumöhl, Eduard; Vŷrost, Tomáš Working Paper YOLO trading: Riding with the herd during the GameStop episode Suggested Citation: Lyócsa, Štefan; Baumöhl, Eduard; Vŷrost, Tomáš (2021) : YOLO trading: Riding with the herd during the GameStop episode, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, Kiel, Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/230679 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:21-Cv-10264-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 36
    Case 3:21-cv-10264-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CHRISTIAN IOVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, C.A. NO. _______________ v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED KEITH PATRICK GILL, MML INVESTORS SERVICES, LLC, AND MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 3:21-cv-10264-MGM Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. OVERVIEW OF WRONGDOING .....................................................................................1 II. THE PARTIES.....................................................................................................................3 III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ..........................................................................................3 IV. FACTS .................................................................................................................................4 A. The Real Keith Gill. .................................................................................................4 B. MML’s and MassMutual’s Obligations To Supervise.............................................6 C. Gill’s Use of Social Media Undermines the Integrity of, and Manipulates, the Market for GameStop Shares. ............................................................................6 D. Plaintiff’s GameStop Options Transactions...........................................................17 V. CLASS ALLEGATIONS ..................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 8, Issue 3 (Spring, 2021)
    The Interdisciplinary Research Journal Volume 8, Issue 3 (Spring, 2021) Issue Highlights: • #MeToo, Body, Desire & Society • A.I. and the Legal Dimension • Hip Hop and Gandhi • Gamestop, Reddit & Hedge Funds • Profiteering from Publication Error, Fraud & Misconduct ISSN 2053-9665 Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal Volume 8, Issue 3 (Spring 2021) ISSN 2053-9665 Published by The Institute of Advanced Study, Zeeman Building University of Warwick, Coventry, Warwickshire, CV4 7AL, UK Editor-in-Chief Dr Gareth J Johnson ([email protected]) Exchanges is a scholar-led, peer-reviewed, diamond open access, interdisciplinary, online-only journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality work by researchers in all disciplines for a broad scholarly audience. No author fees or subscription charges are levied, and contributors retain their author rights. Since 2013, the title has attracted innovative research articles, critical essays and interviews from emerging domain experts and early career researchers globally. The title also publishes scholarly work by practitioner authors and independent scholars. A Managing Editor-in-Chief based at the University of Warwick oversees development, policy and production, while an international Editorial Board comprised of early career researchers provide advice and practically contribute to editorial work. Associate editors are recruited to participate in producing specific special themed issues. Exchanges usually publishes two issues annually, although additional special themed issues
    [Show full text]
  • 02|2021 Efl Insights
    Q-02_2021_efl-News_09 30.06.21 11:47 Seite 1 efl insights 02|2021 An efl – the Data Science Institute Publication Data Democratization in Asset Management Jump on the Hype – German Retail Investors and the Gamestop Frenzy Phish Me If You Can: Insights from an Eye-Tracking Experiment Is Platform Lending Just a Flash in the Pan? Q-02_2021_efl-News_09 30.06.21 11:47 Seite 2 Impressum Redaktion Prof. Dr. Peter Gomber Dr. Jascha-Alexander Koch Herausgeber Prof. Dr. Wolfgang König Vorstandsvorsitzender efl – the Data Science Institute e. V. Prof. Dr. Peter Gomber Stellvertretender Vorstandsvorsitzender efl – the Data Science Institute e. V. Kontakt [email protected] www.eflab.de Gestaltung Novensis Communication GmbH Bad Homburg 2. Ausgabe, 2021 Auflage: 200 Stück (Print) / 2.000 Stück (E-Paper) Copyright © by efl – the Data Science Institute e. V. Printed in Germany ISSN 1866-1238 Q-02_2021_efl-News_09 30.06.21 11:47 Seite 3 efl | insights 02 | 2021 03 Editorial Data Democratization in Asset Management Dr. Markus Lohmann Markus Lohmann Chief Technology and Data Officer Allianz Global Investors “Data is the new oil” is the claim often used to Data Democratization as the Current Using Democratized Data Effectively Requires the products function), the main task for own- underpin the importance of data for business Paradigm Strong Governance and Architectures ers now is to ensure adequate usage outside progress. In fact, in May 2017, The Economist their function. Like oil, raw data is not valuable reported that the world’s most valuable At Allianz Global Investors, we have turned Data governance delivers most of the answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading in the Time of Covid: a Robinhood Bromance
    TRADING IN THE TIME OF COVID: A ROBINHOOD..., 28 No. 2 PIABA B.J. 159 28 No. 2 PIABA B.J. 159 PIABA Bar Journal 2021 Melanie Cherdack a1 Copyright © 2021 by Melanie S. Cherdack, All Rights Reserved. TRADING IN THE TIME OF COVID: A ROBINHOOD BROMANCE Introduction In ancient times, circa 1960, an investor would dial his stockbroker on a rotary phone, place an order to purchase shares in IBM stock, the broker would call his trader on the floor of the NYSE, the trader would make a bid to the specialist for the shares, the buy order would be matched with an order to sell, the trade would be recorded with a pencil and a scrap of paper, the order would be filled, the stock certificate would be sent through the mail, and the investor would hold the shares for decades. Not so anymore. Every aspect of investing has changed. The types of securities sold, the proliferation of exchanges, and the disparate trading systems have altered the ways in which the business of securities trading is conducted. 1 And, the era of algorithms and electronic high speed trading, 2 coupled with individual investors' ease of access to the markets through apps and trading platforms, has drastically changed the nature of trading securities. With that, the profile of the individual investor has also morphed. Suffice it to say, “Its not your father's stock market anymore.” An App Is Born The shift to discount brokerage firms and internet trading through platforms like E*Trade and Charles Schwab opened the markets to include a *160 new breed of individual investor seeking to make investments on their own without the use of a traditional broker.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET – Reddit, Robinhood, Gamestop & Rigged Markets
    – FACT SHEET – Reddit, Robinhood, GameStop & Rigged Markets: The Key Issues for Investigation February 1, 20211 The Reddit-fueled and Robinhood-facilitated frenzied trading of GameStop and a number of other public companies have raised serious investor protection and market integrity issues. Indeed, it has exposed a vast predatory ecosystem underpinning too much of modern finance, including the anti-retail trader, anti-buy side practices enabled by a rigged market structure. These events have, once again, also exposed the need to investigate the conduct of numerous financial firms and market intermediaries, including brokers, hedge funds, dealers, short sellers and Wall Street’s megabanks. And it calls for renewed scrutiny into trading practices that have become ingrained in the markets, including leverage, liquidity, derivatives, fragmentation, complexity, interconnectedness, high frequency trading, the gamification of retail trading, market manipulation and conflicts of interest. The equities markets are supposed to facilitate price discovery and allocate capital to its optimal use through fair, orderly, and efficient trading. Recent events related to Reddit, Robinhood, GameStop and other stock trading unrelated to any fundamental, company specific information or rational basis risk shattering investors’ trust and confidence both in the markets and in the regulators who are supposed to protect those markets and their participants. Those regulators have very powerful investigative tools and have full authority to stop and punish fraud, market manipulation, false and misleading statements as well as the full panoply of disclosure violations. Contrary to much self-interested spin, this is not a game. There are lots of real people who are going to lose billions of dollars in connection with this market frenzy and not just hedge funds and other sophisticated financial firms shorting particular stocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Degenerates’ Took on Hedge Funds Sven Van Kerckhoven1 and Sean O’Dubhghaill2
    Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal Gamestop: How online ‘degenerates’ took on hedge funds Sven Van Kerckhoven1 and Sean O’Dubhghaill2 Brussels School of Governance, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Correspondence: [email protected] & [email protected] ORCID: 10000-0002-4946-2500 & 20000-0003-2976-1754 Editorial review: This Abstract article has been subject to an editorial review The spread of COVID-19 has forced many people around the world to adjust process the manner in which they relate to and participate in the goings-on of the outside world. This article examines a seemingly novel attempt by a few amateur investors to take on the might of hedge funds’ cutting-edge algorithms. Our analysis includes an examination of short-selling, online Copyright notice: This article is issued under the investment communities and the problem of collective action they face. terms of the Creative This piece examines how Wall Street betters on Reddit, with little or no Commons Attribution experience, brought a new series of questions about regulation and License, which permits use and redistribution of speculative investing to the fore. We close by reflecting on the kinds of the work provided that questions that people who are interested in the stock market (no matter the original author and their ability) might ask themselves in the very near future. source are credited. You must give Keywords: Gamestop; finance; short squeeze; collective action; appropriate credit wallstreetbets (author attribution), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Economics and Finance Chair of Financial Markets
    Department of Economics and Finance Chair of Financial Markets and Institutions The Gamestop Case: How a reddit group shocked the stock market SUPERVISOR PROF. STEFANO DI COLLI CANDIDATE GIORGIO LUCANGELI ID: 225111 ACADEMIC YEAR 2019/2020 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 4 1. CHAPTER 1: How is it even possible 5 1.1 Short Selling 1.1.1 Short Squeeze 1.1.2 Naked Short 1.2 r/wallstreetbets 1.3 Hedge Fund 1.4 Retail Investing 1.5 Robinhood 2. CHAPTER 2: What happened. 15 2.1 GameStop 2.2 Before 25/01/2021 2.3 After 25/01/2021 2.4 The Bubble Burst 2.5 Consequences 2.5.1 For GameStop Giorgio Lucangeli. 2 2.5.2 For Short Sellers 2.5.3 For Retail Investors CONCLUSION 22 REFERENCES 23 Giorgio Lucangeli. 3 INTRODUCTION How a reddit group shocked the stock market In January 2021 the price of GameStop’s stock skyrocketed, going up from $17 to more than $500, more or less 30 times of the valuation at the beginning of the year. Short sellers, represented mostly by Hedge fund, have suffered an estimated loss of $19 billion [1]. That price increase has almost nothing to do whit GameStop managerial choice, as a matter of fact GME is a dying company, it happened because there was a short squeeze. That is not been the first short squeeze (Volkswagen in 2008, where their share price went up to more than$1000 [2], KaloBios in 2015, which share price grew by 10,000% in a week [3]) but as a matter of facts this is the first one organized by a group of retailer investor, that coordinated themselves on a reddit group called r/wallstreetbets.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Reddit During the Gamestop Stock Crisis
    The increasing presence of online communities in crisis situations: A case study of Reddit during the GameStop stock crisis Alexandru Valentin Beian (20191705) Diana Andra Durdeu (20191734) Aalborg University, CCG, May 2021 Abstract In January 2021 members of r/wallstreetbets, a subreddit of the Reddit community, massively mobilized to buy stocks of an American video game retailer, GameStop, which caused a short squeeze of the stock and major loses for the short sellers. Taking a multi-vocal approach, based on the Rhetorical Arena Theory (Frandsen & Johansen, 2010) we aim to understand the main factors which enabled the online community to mobilize during the GME crisis. To answer this problem, we will conduct our research on two dimensions. The first one explores the macro and micro context which enabled the community to mobilize and the second one looks closer at the particularities of the interactions between community members to better understand how their communication helped them act unified. We conduct our research based on the netnography methodology (Kozinets, 2015), using web documents such as news websites and the Reddit platform to better understand the interactions in the digital environment. The findings of this study showed that two factors facilitated the mobilization of the community. The context in which the events took place allowed its members to start the rhetorical arena of the crisis long before the events of the crisis began to affect the hedge funds in crisis and to remain a dominant voice in the arena until its peak, as the organizations in crisis ignored the potential threat they represented and let them have the communication initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Reddit in the Gamestop Short Squeeze
    IIMB-WP N0. 644/2021 WORKING PAPER NO: 644 WallStreetBets Against Wall Street: The Role of Reddit in the GameStop Short Squeeze Abhinav Anand Assistant Professor Finance & Accounting Indian Institute of Management Bangalore Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore – 5600 76 [email protected] Jalaj Pathak Assistant Professor Finance & Accounting Great Lakes Institute of Management Chennai [email protected] Year of Publication – June 2021 WallStreetBets Against Wall Street: The Role of Reddit in the GameStop Short Squeeze Abhinav Anand∗ Jalaj Pathak† June 22, 2021 Abstract By January 2021, the stock of GameStop (GME) was heavily shorted by institutional investors but an unprecedented retail cam- paign for pushing-up its stock price culminated in a short squeeze by the end of January 2021. Adapting recent innovations in text anal- ysis in finance and on microblogging platforms, we present evidence that both the tone and the volume of discussions on the subreddit r/wallstreetbets had significant predictive associations with the GME return, volatility and put-call ratio. Keywords: Short Squeeze, GameStop, WallStreetBets, Text Anal- ysis, Social News Platform JEL Classification: D91, G14, G40 ∗Indian Institute of Management Bangalore †Great Lakes Institute of Management, Chennai 1 \Yea there's deep value, then there's deep fucking value." Keith Gill (u/DeepFuckingValue), r/wallstreetbets.1 1 Introduction At the beginning of 2021, financial markets in the US witnessed an up-to-then unprecedented event: social-media-coordinated trading actions of numerous retail investors long on GameStop (GME)|a video game company|forced its price to appreciate rapidly leading to major losses for several institutional investors who had massively shorted the stock.
    [Show full text]
  • C-Uppsats Grupp 22
    Uppsala universitet Institutionen för informatik och media C-uppsats i medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap Framlagd VT 2021 “We’re not selling” En studie av r/wallstreetbets Författare: Daniel Ebeid & Ida Hellgren Handledare: Anne-Marie Morhed Abstract In the beginning of 2021, the stock of strained and heavily shorted company GameStop rose by almost 2,000 percent. The meteoric rise was caused after users of the subreddit r/wallstreetbets mobilized to buy up stock of the business, hoping that short- sellers would be forced to close their positions, leading to further upside. The purpose of this study is to describe the culture of the subreddit, using Stuart Hall’s (1997) theory of representation to explain how users create meaning. Furthermore, we attempt to explain how the digital nature of the movement affected its structure and organisation, for which Bennett and Segerbergs (2012) framework The logic of connective action is applied. The study used a netnographic approach for data-collection, which was later analyzed using qualitative text- analysis and semiotic-image- analysis. In total, 50 different posts were analyzed which included both texts and memes. Our results indicate that the movement is characterized by the lack of hierarchy and a substantial amount of user- generated content. Narratives and motives have been naturally constructed collectively through the interaction of users rather than enforced by a central authority. A unique feature of the movement is its exclusively digital presence, allowing for fluid participation and individualized framing. The premises and boundaries of activism change as activism becomes more dependent on the digital world. This study offers insight into how digital movements can be constructed and how the digital fundamentally changes the preconditions of activism and mobilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Following Below Is a Summary of the Written Testimony Submitted in Advance Of
    Following below is a summary of the written testimony submitted in advance of today’s hearing in the House Financial Services Committee - “Game Stopped? Who Wins and Loses When Short Sellers, Social Media, and Retail Investors Collide”? – in the order as it appears on the Committee’s website (links to the individual testimony in the headers). The written testimonies are brief (with the exception of Robinhood’s), with some providing recommendations on potential regulatory changes, primarily around shortening the settlement cycle. Also below is a summary of the Committee memorandum on the hearing. A summary of the hearing itself will follow. Please let me know if you have any questions on the hearing or associated issues. Testimony of Vladimir Tenev, Chief Executive Officer, Robinhood Markets The written testimony spends a good portion discussing the “Robinhood Story” as well as the products and features offered by the brokerage platform and a look at Robinhood’s investors. The testimony does state at the outset that “any allegation that Robinhood acted to help hedge funds or other special interests to the detriment of our customers is absolutely false and market-distorting rhetoric” and that “[w]hat we experienced last month was extraordinary, and the trading limits we put in place on GameStop and other stocks were necessary to allow us to continue to meet the clearinghouse deposit requirements that we pay to support customer trading on our platform.” On payment for order flow, the testimony states “there have been questions about how we offer zero-commission trades and other benefits to customers.” Specifically, the testimony states that Robinhood has “negotiated the same rebate rate with each of the market-makers to whom we route customers’ orders, which eliminates any incentive for Robinhood to direct orders to any specific market maker” and that Robinhood customers received more than $1 billion in price improvement in the first half of 2020.
    [Show full text]