Aquatic Invasive Species Action Plan Didymo Natural Diversity Section June 2011

Aquatic Invasive Species are resistant to degradation by bacteria or (AIS) Action Plan: fungi. Didymo

This action plan is a living document and will be updated, as needed, to reflect the status of the species in .

Natural History

Description: “Didymo” is a microscopic alga also colloquially known as ‘rock snot’.

Taxonomy

Common name: Didymo Family : Gomphonemataceae Species: Didymosphenia geminata ITIS Taxonomic Serial Number: 591283

ITIS-Integrated Taxonomic Information System.

Morphology: Didymosphenia geminata (Bascillariophyta) is a very large (>100 microns), single-celled, ‘coke-bottle’ shaped alga known as a diatom (Figure 1a.). are structurally unique because their cell walls contain silica (SiO2). This gives mats of the species a characteristic ‘wet cotton’ feel when handled, which distinguishes it from species of filamentous which generally are slimy to the touch. D. geminata cells produce an extracellular, Figures. branched stalk which can form strong 1a (Top). Stalked didymo cells. (Photo: Walt Butler attachments to a variety of substrates, DNR). including plants (epiphytic) and hard 1b (Middle). Didymo clump from substrates such as stones (epilithic) (Figure upper Delaware River. 1b.). This branched stalk is comprised of (Photo: by Tim Daley PA DEP). complex polysaccharides and proteins that

Page | 1 Aquatic Invasive Species Action Plan Dydimo Natural Diversity Section June 2011

Origin: Didymo is thought to be native to survive outside of a stream in cool, damp, the northern regions of Europe, Asia, and dark conditions for at least 40 days. other cool water areas in the northern Recreational equipment that may sustain D. hemisphere; however, in recent years it has geminata environments suitable for survival expanded in range and habitat tolerance to include: neoprene waders, wetsuits, felt- include streams in warmer climates. soled wading boots, fishing tackle and compartments on boats and other equipment. Food Preferences: Photosynthetic organism that can be both phosphorus and nitrogen Preferred Habitat: The ecological limited. distribution for D. geminata appears to have expanded from more boreal, montane Reproductive behavior: The life history of habitats (nutrient-poor) to aquatic habitats most diatoms includes both vegetative and with higher nutrient levels. Limited sexual reproduction although the sexual information is available on the thermal stage has not so far been documented in D. requirements for successful vegetative geminata. When a D. geminata cell divides reproduction but suggested water via vegetative cell division, the stalk also temperatures range from 4-27° C (39-80° F) divides, forming dense mats (nuisance (Kilroy et al. 2005; Stoddard et al. 2005). D. blooms) under certain environmental geminata appears to thrive in streams and conditions (Spaulding and Elwell 2007). rivers with stable substrates, particularly hard rock catchment areas (larger substrates Notable Characteristics: Stalked D. resistant to higher stream velocities) and geminata consolidate in mats of up to 20 cm regulated rivers (smaller substrates but (~ 8 inches) in thickness on the bottom of stable flow regimes). D. geminata can infected waterways. tolerate high water velocity (>1 m3/s) but the diatoms appear to become dislodged during Historic Vectors: The method(s) by which storm events which cause significant D. geminata spread across northern North bedload shift and downstream mobilization America approximately 100 years ago are of sediment. Specific minimum water unknown. The earliest record of D. geminata velocity requirements for D. geminata are in North America is from Cleve (1894-1896) currently unknown (Kilroy 2004). D. who reported it from Vancouver Island, geminata requires high light conditions for . Boyer, 20 years later, growth, and reports generally indicate that reported D. geminata in the Delaware River shaded environments may limit growth. in the vicinity of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Turbidity may also be a factor limiting (1916). In general, historical reports of D. growth (Kilroy 2005). Noga (2003) noted geminata are sparse and voucher specimens that brown-stained water from peat bogs uncommon (Spaulding and Elwell 2007). appeared to limit D. geminata growth and suggested that water clarity may be limiting. Current Pathways/Vectors: Dispersal Reported didymo pH requirements vary but, mechanisms are not well understood but in general, the alga seems to prefer relatively likely are tied to angling and other stream high pH streams. recreation activities. Kilroy (2005) documented the ability of D. geminata to

Page | 2 Aquatic Invasive Species Action Plan Dydimo Natural Diversity Section June 2011

Distribution and Status Pennsylvania Legal Status: Currently not regulated in 58 Pa. Code §71.6 and §73.1.

Distribution: Nationally, D. geminata has been confirmed in at least 14 states. The Threats majority of confirmed occurrences are in , , and Montana. Ecological: D. geminata appears to cause macroinvertebrate community shifts due to D. geminata has been confirmed in the East the diatom’s extensive coverage of exposed and West Branches of the Delaware River substrates. These shifts are generally ( and Pennsylvania) as well as in characterized by the reduction of the Delaware River mainstem as far south as Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera Callicoon, New York (Daley and Silldorff, (stoneflies) and Trichoptera (caddisflies) personal communication). The extent of the (aka EPT taxa) due to habitat loss and species’ distribution in Pennsylvania beyond replacement by more pollution-tolerant taxa the upper 27.5 miles of the Delaware River (e.g. chironomids) (Spaulding and Elwell mainstem and the West Branch is unknown 2007). Another unpublished study in (Figure 2). The status of D. geminata in the Montana demonstrated an increase in Delaware River could be considered a range dipteran taxa (e.g. chironomids) and loss of expansion, although natural occurrences EPT taxa. have not been reported previously for this stretch of river and range expansion by The effect of D. geminata on freshwater natural causes should be considered mussel populations is unknown. However, unlikely. D. geminata has also been due to the ability of nuisance blooms to confirmed in Maryland just south of the cover stream substrates to a depth of 20cm Pennsylvania border at Gunpowder Falls in (about 8 inches), mussels may suffer from Baltimore County and in the reduced ability to suspension feed, and in western Maryland (Maryland DNR, reduced ability to move during low flow personal communication). periods may lead to their desiccation. Sediment accumulating on top of D. geminata mats may bury mussels completely. Although D. geminata blooms have been observed to have supersaturated dissolved oxygen levels within the concentrated stalk masses (Larned et al. 2006), mussel kills could occur if mass D. geminata die-off produces anoxic conditions associated with decomposition. Of particular concern are the effects of D. geminata on Pennsylvania’s population of endangered dwarf Figure 2. Pennsylvania distribution of Didymo wedgemussel (Alasmidonta (Didymosphenia geminata) (April, 2011).

Page | 3 Aquatic Invasive Species Action Plan Dydimo Natural Diversity Section June 2011

heterodon) in the upper Delaware River. management of the species needs to focus Studies examining the effects of D. on containing or eliminating the existing geminata on freshwater mussel communities populations to prevent their spreading to are needed. additional waterways.

The direct effects of D. geminata on sport Containment and Prevention Options: fish, primarily trout, and other fish species Efforts to stop the spread of D. geminata have not been well studied. However, within Pennsylvania need to focus on community shifts in benthic containing the existing Delaware River macroinvertebrates and reduction of their population and to closely monitor the biomass may have a ripple-effect throughout Maryland populations at Gunpowder Falls higher trophic levels. As with freshwater and the Savage River and the Pennsylvania mussels, D. geminata die-offs could cause waters near those areas. fish mortality due to low dissolved oxygen levels. • Initiate a public education effort to acquaint the populace with the threat of Economic: While detailed economic threat and measures to prevent the spread of studies of D. geminata impacts in the United didymo. States evidently have not yet been conducted, a 2006 report to Biosecurity New • Advocate inclusion of didymo on the Zealand identified seven potential didymo invasive species lists in 58 Pa. Code related economic threats to that country. §71.6 and §73.1. Potential economic impacts to many of the following, due to the effects of D. geminata, • Encourage the incident reporting of are likely applicable to Pennsylvania: 1) aquatic invasive species within commercial and sport fisheries; 2) Pennsylvania. Online reporting can now municipal, industrial and agricultural water be conducted at the following PFBC web intake; 3) community, municipal and site: domestic drinking water; 4) local recreation http://www.fish.state.pa.us/promo/form/ values; 5) tourism expenditures; 6) local ais_reporting.htm existence values; and 7) existence values associated with extinction of native species • Advocate development of water hauler (New Zealand 2006). disinfection procedures and regulations within Pennsylavania. Human health: The frustules (hard, silica shells of the diatom) can be present in the • Keep informed about the potential use of water column downstream of nuisance DNA-based detection methodologies blooms. As a result, people swimming in and also about any new developments areas downstream of large blooms of D. concerning the use of biocides effective geminata may experience eye irritation or against didymo. itchiness similar to pollen reactions. • Investigate didymo infected waters Management within Pennsylvania and inventory nearby or suspected waters. Management Goals: Didymo already resides in Pennsylvania border waters. Therefore

Page | 4 Aquatic Invasive Species Action Plan Dydimo Natural Diversity Section June 2011

• Research the issues of anglers spreading Larned, S., B. Biggs, N. Blair, C. Burns, aquatic invasive species and the banning B. Jarvie, D. Jellyman, C. Kilroy, J. of relevant personnel fishing gear. Leathwick, K. Lister, J. Nagels, M. Schallenberg, S. Sutherland, J. Sykes, • Initiate and support research to establish W. Thompson, K. Vopel, and B. the ecologic requirements of didymo and Wilcock. 2006. Ecology of to determine its effects on fish, benthic Didymosphenia geminata in New fauna, freshwater mussel communities Zealand: habitat and ecosystem effects – and other aquatic resources. Phase 2. NIWA Client Report CHC2006-086, NIWA Project Rapid Response Options: MAF06507.

• Application of algaecides per New Zealand Institute of Economic existing protocols. Research. 2006. Didymosphenia geminata economic impact assessment. Final report to Biosecurity New References Zealand.

Noga, T. 2003. Dispersion of Cleve, P.T. 1894-1896. Synopsis of the Didymosphenia geminata in the flowing Naviculoid Diatoms. Kongliga waters of Southern Poland – new sites of Sevenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens species occurrence in the Orawska Handlingar. Stockholm. (Reprinted watershed and the Orawaska Basin. 1965, A. Asher and Co., Amsterdam). Oceanological and Hydrobiological

Studies 32: 159-170. Kilroy, C. 2004. A new alien diatom,

Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) Spaulding, S. and L. Elwell. 2007. Increase Schmidt: its biology, distribution, effects in Nuisance Blooms and Geographic and potential risks for New Zealand fresh Expansion of the Freshwater Diatom waters. National Institute of Water and Didymosphenia geminata. U.S. Atmospheric Research Ltd. NIWA Environmental Protection Agency. Client Report: CHC2004-128. NIWA

Project:ENS05501. Stoddard, J.L., D. V. Peck, A. R. Olsen, S.

G. Paulsen, J. Van Sickle, A. T. Herlihy, Kilroy, C. 2005. Tests to determine the P. R. Kaufmann, R. M. Hughes, effectiveness of methods for Whittier, T.R., Lomnicky, G., Larsen, decontaminating materials that have D.P., Peterson, S.A., and P.L. Ringold. been in contact with Didymosphenia 2005. Ecological assessment of western geminata. Biosecurity New Zealand. streams and rivers. U.S. Environmental National Institute of Water and Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon. Atmospheric Research Ltd.

U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Library. http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/aqu atics/didymo.shtml., March 09, 2011.

Page | 5