Child Theology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THEOLOGY IN THE LIFE OF THE CHURCH Vol. 5 Theological Practices That Matter The Lutheran World Federation – A Communion of Churches eology in the Life of the Church series Being the Church in the Midst of Empire. Trinitarian Reflection s, Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.) Deepening Faith, Hope and Love in Relations with Neighbors of Other Faiths , Simone Sinn (ed.) Identity, Survival Witness. Reconfiguring !eological Agendas , Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.) Lutherans Respond to Pentecostalism, Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.) !eological Practices that Matter , Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.) Transformative !eological Perspectives , Karen L. Bloomquist (ed.) eological Practices that Matter !eology in the Life of the Church, vol. 5 Karen L. Bloomquist, Editor on behalf of the Lutheran World Federation Copyright © 2009, Lutheran University Press and !e Lutheran World Federation. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in articles and reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior permission. Editorial assistance and layout: LWF/Department for !eology and Studies Design: LWF/Office of Communication Services Artwork on cover: LWF/Office of Communication Services. Photo © LWF/D.-M. Grötzsch Published by Lutheran University Press under the auspices of: !e Lutheran Word Federation—A Communion of Churches 150, rte de Ferney, P O Box 2100 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland !is book is also available in certain European bookstores using ISBN 978-3-905676-87-7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data !eological practices that matter / Karen L. Bloomquist, editor. p. cm. -- (!eology in the life of the church ; v. 5) ISBN-13: 978-1-932688-43-6 (alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-932688-43-9 (alk. paper) 1. Lutheran Church--Doctrines. 2. Christian life--Lutheran authors. I. Bloomquist, Karen L., 1948- BX8065.3.T44 2009 230’.41--dc22 2009042329 Lutheran University Press, PO Box 390759, Minneapolis, MN 55439 Printed in Switzerland by SRO-Kundig Contents 5 Introduction Karen L. Bloomquist 15 Bible, Prayer and Confession: En Route to the Reformation Jubilee Margot Kässmann 25 The Hermeneutic of Resonance: Making Biblical Theology Relevant Toda y Fidon R. Mwombeki 37 Worship as the Heart of Theology: Luther’s Intercultural Approach Jens Wolff 45 Confessions, Ecumenism, Ethnicity: A Lutheran Charism Dirk G. Lange 55 Marked by the Body of Christ: A Lutheran Approach to Practices Martha Ellen Stortz 67 A Response to “Marks of the Church; Marked by the Body of Christ” Lisandro Orlov 71 Narratives of Sexuality and Hope: an African Woman’s Perspective Elieshi Mungure 79 Indigenizing the Church in Africa Ramathate Dolamo 85 A Critique of African Theology’s Anthropology: Why are Children Excluded from the Table ? Kenneth Mtata 85 A Critique of African Theology’s Anthropology: Why are Children Excluded from the Table? Kenneth Mtata Introduction !is article seeks to show that the exclusion of children from the Eucharist in most African Lutheran churches is a result of the social position children have occupied in the hierarchy of the construction of personhood in African thought. It will be suggested here that the communitarian construction of personhood, upon which African theological reflection has traditionally been based, is inadequate with regard to children and other people at the margins. As Gwinyai Muzorewa put it, [t]he concept of humanity, which has largely determined all other African cosmological concepts, is central in traditional religion. How African human- ity has traditionally perceived itself is of primary importance to a developing African theology. 1 Claiming that the African person is communitarian conceals the hierar- chical construction of personhood, which reduces children to less than full persons and results in their being excluded from the Eucharist. !is is contrary to the basic tenets of the Lutheran Confessions that teach that we receive salvation through the means of grace and not because we qualify for them. In other words, a faulty anthropology produces a faulty theology, and a faulty theology produces a skewed anthropology. !ere prevails an un- critical assumption that African personhood, upon which African theol- 1 Gwinyai H. Muzorewa, !e Origins and Development of African !eology (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2000), p. 16; cf. John S. Mbiti, Introduction to African Religion (New York: Praeger, 1975), p. 77. 86 Theological Practices that Matter ogy is built, is communitarian. !is assumption is inaccurate and distorts African theology. The absence of children in African theological reflection It is neither possible, nor necessary, to give a detailed overview of African theology here. My purpose here is to show that the absence of children in African theological reflection was (and still is) a result of the fact that in African theology the person is presupposed as object rather than subject. In agreement with many other African and non-African theologians, Tinyiko S. Maluleke observed the “dynamism and innovation” in African Chris- tian practice and theological reflection. 2 Although he conflates “African Christianity and African theology,” using the two terms “interchangeably,” I still think he is correct in the creativity he observes in both African Christianity and theology. 3 Although Maluleke is one of the few African critics of the nostalgic embrace of African culture, he has not questioned the construction of African personhood as a faulty base on which to build African theology. A brief investigation into the genealogy of African theol- ogy will support this assertion. The first generation of African theology Josiah U. Young’s categorization of the phases of African theology offers some important insights, 4 even though some important aspects of it have been challenged. 5 !e first generation of African theologians emerged in the early days of independence from colonial rule. Muzorewa suggests that the formalization of African theology dates back to the “inauguration of 2 Tinyiko Sam Maluleke, “Half a Century of African Christian !eologies: Elements of the Emerging Agenda for the Twenty-first Century,” in Journal of !eology for Southern Africa 99 (1997), pp. 4–23, here p. 4. 3 It is appropriate to think of African theology as an academic reflection on African Christian practices in dialogue with existing theological categories whether or not from Western theology. See also Mika Vähäkangas, In Search of Foundations for African Catholicism: Charles Nyamiti’s !eological Methodology (Leiden: Brill, 1999), pp. 10–14. !is debate is not the focus of this paper, but the relevant issue for this discussion is the point of creativity in African theology that Maluleke raises. 4 !e categorization used here is critically borrowed from Josiah U. Young III, African !eology: A Critical Analysis and Annotated Bibliography (London: Greenwood Press, 1993). 5 Maluleke, op. cit. (note 2), p. 6. A Critique of African Theology’s Anthropology 87 the All Africa Conference of Churches (AACC)” in Kampala. 6 !is first phase was presided over by an African élite, who had been educated in “mission schools and often pursued their higher education abroad.” 7 !eol- ogy produced by this generation of African theologians resonated with the Pan-African discourse in its affirmation of the African person as a cultural person. Such theologians as Edward Blyden, Bolaji Idowu and Kwesi Dickson focused more on the discovery of the “African personality,” a perspective that sought to redeem African personhood from the “savage” representations of derogatory colonial narratives. Driven by the “cultural nationalism that owed more to Westernization than to popular culture,” this generation of African scholars were more “focused on religio-cultural analysis, with little, if any, social analysis.” 8 One leading figure promoting African religious and cultural tradition was John Mbiti, whose project centered on recovering those aspects of African cosmology and culture that were in continuity with the worldview of the gospel. 9 Mbiti constructed an African ethno-philosophy of time that contradicted Western appropriations of the Christian faith and could be at home in Africa. !ough criticized for essentializing and de-regionalizing African culture, Mbiti’s contribution became the basis for most African theological reflection. One of Mbiti’s major contributions, was his claim that the African was communitarian in his [ sic ] personhood. 10 While this generation of African theologians affirmed African cultural identities, it did very little to deconstruct African culture. !ere was a glaring absence of a clear critique of the oppressive nature of the culture upon which this generation’s theological reflection has been built. Apart from its insensitivity to the plight of African women, this theological project ignored children, since in many African cultures children are not considered to be full persons. !e theology focused on adult males, both living and dead. Children were only mentioned in relation to the taboos of barrenness and infertility in African thought. 11 In other words, the first 6 Gwinyai H. Muzorewa, !e Origins and Development of African !eology (New York: Orbis Books, 1985), p. 57. 7 Young, op. cit . (note 4), p. 13. 8 Ibid ., p. 13. 9 Ibid ., p. 17. 10 John Mbiti, African Religions and Philosophy (London: Heinemann, 1969), pp. 108–9. Note that gender was not central to Mbiti’s theology. 11 Ibid ., pp. 142–3. 88 Theological Practices that Matter phase of African theology was designed by adult males, for adult males. !is, however, did not go unnoticed and unchallenged.