DOCSLIB.ORG

Ivf Annual Report 2011.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ivf Annual Report 2011.Pdf annual report 2011 & guide 2012 annual report 2011 guide to programs in 2012 Rachel Mikos | Visegrad Visibility Project contents © 2012, International Visegrad Fund about 7 grant programs 22 Small Grants Standard Grants Visegrad Strategic Program Visegrad University Studies Grant Visegrad+ mobility programs 23 Visegrad Scholarship Program Visegrad Scholarships at OSA Visegrad Artist Residency Program (VARP)—General Residencies Visegrad Artist Residencies in New York Visegrad Artist Residencies—Performing Arts visegrad 4 eastern partnership program (v4eap) 26 Flagship Projects Standard Grants—EaP Visegrad University Studies Grants—EaP Visegrad Scholarships for EaP in the pipeline 27 Visegrad Literary Residency Program Extension of Visegrad Scholarships Design Eva Péč Brezinová projects approved in 2011 29 Print Typoset, s.r.o. Texts set in Idealista by Tomáš Brousil and Fedra by Peter Biľak. Photographs: Julia Baier (p. 15), Markéta Bendová (p. 11), Kata Koti (p. 21), Rachel Mikos (inside cover), Csaba Szentesi (p. 24), Katalin Szomogyvári (p. 8, 27), Zsuzsa Varró (p. 28); Visegrad Visibility Project by the European Cultural Foundation, Budapest (Standard Grants No. 21010302 and 21110462) Special thanks to Éva Karádi and Gabriella Csoszó. foreword Dear friends, Let me open my overview of the International Visegrad Fund’s activities with a brief reminiscence. In 2004, the prime ministers of the Visegrad countries met in Kroměříž to consider the destiny of Visegrad cooperation. Visegrad countries had by then met the goals that had brought them together thirteen years earlier within the Visegrad Group. This famous return to Europe was completed through successful accession negotiations with the European Union, and raised the question of further cooperation in the group. The 2004 summit resolved this question in a positive way. It was decided that Visegrad cooperation would not just continue; its agenda was enriched by a new issue. “The Visegrad Group countries are ready to use their unique regional and historical experience to contribute to shaping and implementing the European Union’s policies towards the countries of Eastern and Southeastern Europe.” The International Visegrad Fund has become an important tool in supporting this plan. Step by step, new mobility and grant programs focusing on Eastern and Southeastern Europe have been established. In 2011, the Visegrad 4 Eastern Partnership program was approved at a prime ministers’ summit in Bratislava. V4EaP is now the biggest program that the Fund has ever run outside the Visegrad region. At times we may hear the reproach that the Fund should focus its activities within the Visegrad region rather than outside it. No doubt the main mission of the Fund remains the strengthening of the internal cohesion of the region but, on the other hand, there are good reasons why the Fund should pay more attention to non- Visegrad countries. One of these reasons lies at the historical and ethical levels. When the V4 countries stood at the threshold of the transformation process, they could rely on help from Western countries willing to share their know-how, just as they provided material help. I think it is time for us to try to pay this historical debt forward and help our neighbors. At the same time, this is our visible contribution to the EU’s endeavor to broaden the belt of stability and 2000 2006 2010 2011 2012 prosperity in Europe. This is also a significant contribution to ourselves—to the V4 region—because it is unwise to enjoy one’s own welfare without addressing the problems that one’s neighbors may be facing. The new program also represents an interesting opportunity for V4 NGOs to develop and intensify their activities in the countries involved in the Eastern Partnership. Not only can they strengthen their capacities, but also look for and engage with new local partners. The broader and more intensive this cooperation is, the better. New opportunities lay ahead. Let’s use them well. April 2012 Executive Director www.visegradfund.org/media/logo 4 5 » contents staff about International Visegrad Fund | Mezinárodní visegrádský fond | Nemzetközi Visegrádi Alap | Międzynarodowy Fundusz Wyszehradzki | Medzinárodný vyšehradský fond director/deputy director The International Visegrad Fund is an international organization established by the governments of the Visegrad Group (V4) countries—the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia—in 2000. Seated in Bratislava, the Petr Vágner Executive Director Fund has the status of an international organization accredited by the Slovak foreign ministry. The Fund’s main Zbigniew Machej Deputy Executive Director mission is fostering closer contacts and deeper cooperation among people in the region and the development of civil society primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, the Western Balkans and the South Caucasus. The Fund financially supports common grant projects and awards individual mobility projects (scholarships and artist secretariat residencies). By the end of 2011 the Fund granted nearly 3,400 projects and over 1,300 individual scholarships and residencies in the total amount of nearly €39 million. Kristína Ácsová Project Coordinator: Standard Grants Viktória Bódisová Assistant Main recipients of the funding are NGOs and non-profit organizations, municipalities and local governments, Lenka Bučková Project Coordinator schools and universities, research institutions but also individual citizens and private companies. Adriana Dvorská Project Coordinator: Small/Strategic Grants Ľuboš Ďurič Financial Manager (until 2011) The Fund’s annual budget of €7 million consists of equal contributions from the V4 governments. Miroslava Nosáľová Fekiačová Head Secretary Barbora Hromeková Program Manager: Small/Strategic Grants Katarína Hubová Project Coordinator: Standard Grants Judita Nagyová Program Manager: Standard Grants Dana Pekaríková Program Manager: VARP/VUSG/Scholarships contact details Alexandra Regecová Chief Accountant Jiří Sýkora Public Relations Coordinator, Visegrad+ Coordinator International Visegrad Fund T: +421 259 203 811, –802 Soňa Trebatická Project Controller (until 2011) Kráľovské údolie 8 F: +421 259 203 805 811 02 Bratislava W: www.visegradfund.org Slovak Republic E: [email protected] internships (2011) Andrea Boboková | Pedro Brito | Blanka Caletková | Katarzyna Dudzic-Grabińska | Jakub Lexa | Lucia Pitoňáková | Alena Vágnerová links Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Czech Republic www.visegradfind.visegradfund.org trustees www.mzv.cz On-line bulletin board and database for project-partner search Piotr Bajda Trustee for Poland (as of 2012) Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hungary Mihaly András Beke Trustee for Hungary www.mfa.gov.hu Andrea Macková Honorary Trustee for Belarus (until 2011) Jan Stachowski Trustee for Poland (until 2011) Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Poland www.library.visegradfund.org Luboš Veselý Honorary Trustee for Ukraine www.msz.gov.pl On-line catalog of the library of the International Visegrad Fund Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Slovak Republic www.mzv.sk www.visegradrevue.eu 6 7 » contents deadlines calendar I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Visegrad Scholarship Program January 31 Standard Grants—EaP September 15 Small Grants March 1, June 1, September 1, December 1 Visegrad University Studies Grants November 10 Standard Grants March 15, September 15 Visegrad University Studies Grants—EaP November 10 Visegrad Strategic Program March 30 VARP in New York, VARP—Performing Arts December (TBC) VARP—General Residencies September 10 Katalin Somogyvári | Visegrad Visibility Project used abbreviations Admin. administration Intl. international CE Central Europe/Central European IR international relations Comp. computer Reg. regional Dept. department Soc. social EaP Eastern Partnership Tech. technical Econ. economic/economics Univ. university Fac. faculty V4 (relating to) the Visegrad Group countries or the region Inst. institute VSP Visegrad Scholarship Program used codes of countries and territories AL Albania FR France PL Poland AM Armenia GB Great Britain RO Romania AT Austria GE Georgia RS Serbia AZ Azerbaijan HU Hungary RU Russia BA Bosnia and Herzegovina IT Italy SI Slovenia BE Belgium LU Luxembourg SK Slovakia BG Bulgaria MD Moldova UA Ukraine BY Belarus ME Montenegro US United States CZ Czech Republic MK Macedonia XK Kosovo DE Germany NL Netherlands 8 9 » contents overall trends 2000–2011 Markéta Bendová | Visegrad Visibility Project deadline 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2000– indicator 2011 altogether Small Grants Registered 224 372 336 332 395 443 405 376 434 444 3,761 Approved 53 93 133 129 127 155 151 138 133 127 1,239 Allocated sum (€) 200,894 332,224 467,048 462,045 453,652 559,967 556,412 549,977 590,362 591,983 4,764,564 Standard Grants Registered 236 369 251 267 309 372 466 539 480 479 541 633 4,942 Approved 26 89 91 110 139 172 216 248 240 244 253 206 2,034 Allocated sum (€) 406,319 1,523,019 1,723,700 1,749,693 1,623,000 1,804,809 1,854,200 2,146,200 2,255,584 2,416,464 2,470,328 2,282,920 22,256,236 Visegrad Strategic Program Registered 8 11 14 13 13 14 32 105 Approved 2 4 3 7 8 8 13 32 Allocated sum (€) 110,000 190,000 149,350 329,610 322,000 235,500 400,000 1,736,460 Grants total 26 89 144 203 272 303 347 406 398 390 394 346 3,318 Grants altogether (€) 406,319 1,523,019 1,924,594 2,081,917 2,090,048 2,376,854 2,497,852 2,855,517 3,141,606 3,288,441 3,296,190 3,274,903 28,757,260 Visegrad Scholarship Program Registered 61 100 241 182 260 302 474 660 651
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investing Guide Hungary 2014
    Investing Guide Hungary 2014 Why invest in Hungary? A guide with useful information and inspiring success stories of investors in Hungary. Investing Guide Hungary 2014 3 PwC welcomes you with offices in Budapest and Győr Contents I. WHAT SHOULD YOU KNOW ABOUT HUNGARY? 5 Location and climate 6 Infrastructure in Hungary 10 Office market 12 Main industries 14 Leading sector in Hungary: automotive 15 Takata to establish first plant in Hungary – Production scheduled to commence in October 2014 16 Interview with Jiro Ebihara, president of DENSO Manufacturing Hungary Ltd. – Re-invest in Hungary 18 Electronics 19 Pharmaceuticals & medical technology 20 Interview with Erik Bogsch, CEO, Richter Gedeon Nyrt. – A flagship of the Hungarian pharmaceutical industry 21 ICT sector 22 Discover ICT opportunities in Hungary 24 Food industry II. WHY INVEST IN HUNGARY? 25 Overview about the incentives in Hungary 26 Regional aid intensity map 27 Non refundable cash subsidies 28 R&D&I in focus 29 Fast growing and best performing sector 30 Interview with Andor Faragó, General Manager – British Telecom in Hungary 35 Tax incentives III. HOW DOES ONE INVEST IN HUNGARY? 37 Establishing your business 40 Accounting requirements 42 Hiring and employment 44 Key tax related issues IV. ABOUTPlease THE HUNGARIANvisit our website INVESTMENT at www.pwc.com/hu. AND TRADE AGENCY (HITA) 49 Introduction of HITA 49 Investing An interview Guide with HungaryJános Berényi, 2013 Presidentwas prepared of HITA by PricewaterhouseCoopers Hungary Ltd. in cooperation with the Hungarian Investment and Trade Agency. Additional content was provided by Absolut Media Please visit our website at www.pwc.com/hu.
    [Show full text]
  • Budapest and Central Danube Region
    Touristic areas of the Budapest and Central Danube Region www.hungary.com Talent for entertaining Forest Tourinform Office Etyek-Buda wine region Residence Kunság wine region Castle National Park Castle ruin Region’s border Museum Highway Thermal/wellness bath Railway Airport Ferry World Heritage Budapest – Central Danube Region “Why Budapest and its surrounding area?” This is the obvious question holiday makers will ask when planning their travels, and we hope to provide the answer. Budapest, Heroes’ Square Budapest because: • it is the cultural, political and transportation centre of Hungary; • it is built on both side of the Danube, the great European river that is registered as a World Heritage panorama; • nature is safeguarded in two national parks and a number of environmental protection areas; • it has represented a “multicultural Europe” for centuries – over 200 nearby villages are populated by Hungarians, Serbs, Slovaks and Germans (Swabians); • it has a strong artistic and cultural heritage; • there’s always something happening: festivals, concerts, theatre perform- ances, sports competitions, exhibitions, church events, wine celebrations or handicraft fairs; • there are many outdoor activities to enjoy: trekking, rock climbing, biking, horse riding, golf, rowing, swimming, potholing or fl ying; • its restaurants offer not only Hungarian cuisine – and wine and palinka – but food from all over the world. Don’t hesitate – come to Budapest, the centre of things! Széchenyi Thermal Baths (We have marked our suggested “must-see” destinations with ***. However, these are naturally subjective selections, and we hope that our guests will fi nd their own three-star experiences.) MT ZRT www.itthon.hu Visegrád Castle Games 1 Budapest – Central Danube Region Budapest Buda Castle and Chain Bridge When you arrive in Budapest, head to the centre and drink in the view of the city’s two parts, divided by the Danube and linked by the bridges that cross it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigismund of Luxembourg's Pledgings in Hungary
    DOI: 10.14754/CEU.2018.10 Doctoral Dissertation “Our Lord the King Looks for Money in Every Corner” Sigismund of Luxembourg’s Pledgings in Hungary By: János Incze Supervisor(s): Katalin Szende, Balázs Nagy Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department, and the Doctoral School of History Central European University, Budapest in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies, and for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2018 DOI: 10.14754/CEU.2018.10 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1. Pledging and Borrowing in Late Medieval Monarchies: an Overview ......................... 9 Western Europe ......................................................................................................................... 11 Central Europe and Scandinavia ............................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2. The Price of Ascending to the Throne ........................................................................ 26 Preceding events ....................................................................................................................... 26 The Váh-Danube interfluve under Moravian rule .................................................................... 29 Regaining the territory .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Data Sheet
    Luxembourg, 17 September 2013 Environmental and Social Data Sheet Overview Project Name: BUDAPEST-ESZTERGOM RAILWAY RECONSTR I Project Number: 2012-0509 Country: HUNGARY Project Description: Budapest - Esztergom Railway Line Reconstruction, Phase I: The project concerns (i) the upgrading of the railway infrastructure between the Northern Railway Danube bridge (excl) and Piliscsaba (approx. 21 km) and (ii) the rehabilitation of the Piliscsaba- Esztergom line section (approx. 22 km). The project provides capacity increase with an additional track (doubling) to be constructed with a total length of approx.15 km. EIA required: yes 1 Project included in Carbon Footprint Exercise : no (details for projects included are provided in section: “EIB Carbon Footprint Exercise”) Summary of Environmental and Social Assessment, including key issues and overall conclusion and recommendation Some sections of the project fall under Annex I of Directive 2011/92/EU where full EIA was needed, while the other sections of the project fall under Annex II where the relevant Competent Authority decides on a case-by-case basis whether a full EIA has to be carried out or not. For the first section an Environmental Impact Assessment was performed based on the formal requirement issued in October 2008. The respective environmental permit was issued in December 2009. For the other sections on the basis of the preliminary environmental study, the Competent Authority decided to screen-out these sections of the project from completing a full EIA procedure in March 2010. The European Commission has approved the related application for funding from the Cohesion Fund. On this basis, the EIA process is acceptable for the Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Komárom-Esztergom County (Subregion Nuts 3) As an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report
    Working Paper Series Serie 6 Spaces, Territories and Regions Paper No. 6.03.01.02 The Komárom-Esztergom County (Subregion Nuts 3) as an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report James Scott*, Boglárka Szallai† * Karelian Institute – University of Eastern Finland (UEF); † TÁRKI Social Research Institute, Budapest 2014 www.grincoh.eu This paper was funded under the FP7 project “Growth– Innovation – Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe (GRINCOH)” under the Programme SSH.2011.2.2-1: Addressing cohesion challenges in Central and Eastern Europe; Area 8.2.2 Regional, territorial and social cohesion. Project Nr. 290657 James Scott, [email protected] Karelian Institute – University of Eastern Finland (UEF) www.uef.fi Boglárka Szalai, [email protected] TÁRKI Social Research Institute, Budapest www.tarki.hu Please cite as: Scott J., Szalai B.,(2014), ‘The Komárom-Esztergom County (Subregion Nuts 3) as an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report’, GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 6.03.01.02 The Komárom-Esztergom County (Subregion Nuts 3) as an Example of a Successful Transformation- Case Study Report Content Introduction of the Central-Tansdanubian region and Komárom-Esztergom County .............. 2 1.1 The Esztergom Agglomeration and its components ..................................................................... 8 1.2 Is there a commonly accepted delimitation of the city’s metropolitan area and what are its criteria? ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Őexcellenciája Péter SZIJJÁRTÓ Külügyminiszter Bem Rakpart 47 H - 1027 BUDAPEST
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.10.2016 C(2016) 6427 final PUBLIC VERSION This document is made available for information purposes only. Subject: State aid case no. SA.46346 (2016/N) – Hungary – Amendment to the regional aid map for Hungary (2014-2020) for the period 2017-2020 Sir, 1. PROCEDURE (1) On 28 June 2013 the Commission adopted the Guidelines on Regional State Aid for 2014-2020 (hereinafter "RAG")1. On the basis of the RAG the Hungarian authorities notified their regional aid map, which was approved by the Commission on 11 March 2014 for the period from 1 July 2014 until 31 December 20202 (hereinafter "regional aid map approved in 2014"). (2) Pursuant to section 5.6.2 of the RAG, Member States may notify amendments to their regional aid map in the context of the mid-term review in 2016. The amended regional aid maps will be in force from 1 January 2017 until 31 December 2020. (3) The Commission published on 25 June 2016 a Communication amending Annex I to the 3 RAG (hereinafter, the "Communication") . 1 OJ C 209, 23.07.2013, p.1 2 Decision for State aid case SA.37718 - Regional aid map for Hungary (2014-2020), OJ C 172, 06.07.2014, 3 Communication from the Commission (2016/C 231/01) amending Annex I to the Guidelines on regional aid for 2014-2020 (Mid-term review of the regional aid maps), OJ C 231, 25.6.2016, p.1 Őexcellenciája Péter SZIJJÁRTÓ Külügyminiszter Bem rakpart 47 H - 1027 BUDAPEST Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • SZÉNÁS HILLS PROTECTED AREA (HUNGARY) 4-5 Septembre 2019
    Strasbourg, 19 February 2020 T-PVS/DE (2020) 14 [de14e_2020.docx] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 40th meeting Strasbourg, 1-4 December 2020 __________ REPORT ON THE SPOT EXPERT APPRAISAL OF THE SZÉNÁS HILLS PROTECTED AREA (HUNGARY) 4-5 Septembre 2019 Document prepared Mr Bev Nichols (United Kingdom) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/DE (2020) 14 -2- Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Description .............................................................................................................................................. 3 3. European interest ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Habitats ......................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Species .......................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Conservation Measures ........................................................................................................................... 5 4.1 Legal Protection ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 20180301 Toll HU All Service Stations.Xlsx
    POI overview Toll Hungary NEW Servicestelle Name Name 2 Street and House number Postal code City Country scope of payment service DKV CARD SS2304001 SHELL Station Gas station Szabadkai út 7 6729 Szeged Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304002 SHELL Station Gas station Csabai út 5700 Gyula Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304003 SHELL Station Gas station Eloszállási út 7020 Dunaföldvár Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304004 SHELL Station Gas station Bécsi Út 277 1037 Budapest Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304005 SHELL Station Gas station József Attila út 76 3501 Miskolc Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304006 SHELL Station Gas station Pápai út 8200 Veszprém Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304007 SHELL Station Gas station Orosi út 22. 4400 Nyíregyháza Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304008 SHELL Station Gas station M-7-es, 59 km 8000 Székesfehérvár Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304009 SHELL Station Gas station M1 66 Km 2890 Tata Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304011 SHELL Station Gas station M-7-es, 59 km 8000 Székesfehérvár Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304012 SHELL Station Gas station M1 66 Km 2891 Tata Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304013 SHELL Station Gas station M-3-As 12 Km 1150 Budapest Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304014 SHELL Station Gas station M-3-As 12 Km 1150 Budapest Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304015 SHELL Station Gas station Balmazújvárosi út 39 4032 Debrecen Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304016 SHELL Station Gas station Gabonarakpart 6 9200 Mosonmagyaróvár Hungary payment toll and fuel SS2304017 SHELL Station Gas station Balatoni út (7.sz.
    [Show full text]
  • Pe-S-Zp (94) 48
    Council of Europe Conseil de I'Europe * * * * * s ) * * * **** Strasbourg, 13 January 1994 PE-S-ZP (94) 48 STEERING COMMITTEE FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL HABITATS Group of Specialists - "Protected areas" (PE-S-ZP) 23- 25 March 1994 §LZ®IID~§ IHifillll§ {IB3un@$J IPrr®~®~~®@ IL$JIID@§~$1IPJ® Air®$1) Application for the European Diploma presented by: the Hungarian Government OTVH Budapesti Termeszetvedelmi Igazgat6saga National Authority for Nature Conservation Directory of District BUDAPEST This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please brmg this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribue en reumon. Priere de vous munir de cet exemplaire. - 2 - EUROPEAN DIPLOMA Application Country: Hungary /Pest county/ Name of the area: Szenas hills /Buda Protected Landscape Area Body responsible for its management: OTVH Budapesti Termeszetvedelmi Igazgat6saga /National Authority for Nature Conservation, Directory of District Budapest/ Address: H-1121 BUDAPEST Kolto u. 21. 1. Type of area: 1182 hectares strictly protected forest and grassland communities /proposed core area cca. 250 hal and 163 hectares protected forest and grassland as buffer zone; total: 1345 ha. 2. Description of geographical location /outline on a map is enclosed/: The szenas hills /Kis-and Nagyszenas ridges/ are situated in the northwestern part of the Buda mountains belonging to the central chain of mountains in Transdanubia /on the territory of settlements Nagykovacsi, Solymar, Pilisszentivan, Piliscsaba, Perbal/. the concerned area lies predominantly on Triassic dolomite and in a smaller extent on Dachstein limestone ground, bordered everywhere by tertiary sediments. These sediments occupy also the surrounding basins, and mostly they are covered by quaternary loess and sa~d layers, or even by recent sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest Hungary
    INVEST HUNGARY OINN © Published on behalf of N the Hungarian Investment INVEST I Promotion Agency, 2016 (HIPA) HUNGARY Indeed, Hungary is a bustling business The Hungarian Investment Promotion Dear Reader, hub situated right at the very heart of Agency (HIPA) is committed to promoting Europe; physically and in historical, Hungary as a prime investment location fter the historic political changes geographical, cultural and economic and a reliable business partner. HIPA of 1989-90, Hungary’s business terms, all destinations are within easy published this brochure to introduce Aenvironment is now close to maturity. reach. As a full European Union member, the Hungarian business arena, its many With GDP growth reaching 2.9% and 7.5% businesses settling here join the EU investment opportunities, and the main year-on-year industrial growth in 2015, market of more than 500 million people. incentives the government offers to attract the economy has weathered the global FDI. The booklet provides an overview recession and it is one the most dynamic Hungary’s geography is a natural gift, one of the legal environment, available costs, economies in Central Europe. that Hungarians have learnt to use well skills, infrastructure and real estate, through their indomitable resourcefulness, introduces key industrial and service Over the last 25 years, scores of inter- flexibility and creativity. sectors, and showcases success stories national companies have based their from multinationals that have moved key manufacturing and service operations, The country offers tangible investment processes to the heart of Europe. and in some cases, European HQs and benefits to all businesses: SMEs wishing to R&D centres in Hungary, bringing in get closer to multinational buyers; global more than € 84 billion in FDI.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pilisi Erdőirtás És Kopárfásítás Nyírő András
    GAZDÁLKODÁS • 64. évfolyam • 1. szám, 2020 (25–34) 25 A pilisi erdőirtás és kopárfásítás nyírő andrás kulcsszavak: fenntartható fejlődés, erdőgazdálkodás, állami beavatkozás, erdőirtás. Jel-kód: Q01 Q23, Q28, öSSzeFoglaló megállaPÍtáSok, következtetÉSek, JavaSlatok az ipari forradalom hajnalán egész európában nagy méretű erdőirtás kezdődött. a Habsburg-udvar gazdaságpolitikája miatt magyarországot jobban érintette a fo- lyamat, mint a birodalom többi részét. a 18. századi hamuzsírlázhoz kapcsolódó ex- tenzív erdőirtások után a kormányzat megpróbálta szabályozni az erdők védelmét, és a saját eszközeivel támogatta az alternatív energiaforrások feltárását is. a gazda- sági motiváció azonban erősebb volt a szabályozásnál. az erdőirtás nagy erővel foly- tatódott az ipari forradalom energiaigényének kielégítésére. a folyamatot közgazdasági szempontból úgy értelmezhetjük, hogy a fakivágás után az erdők pótlásának költségét a következő generációkkal fizettették meg. ezért volt olcsó energiaforrás a fa az ipari forradalom idején. magyarországon a törvényhozó az 1879-es törvényben megpróbálkozott azzal, hogy az előző nemzedékek által hátrahagyott költségeket a területek aktuális tulaj- donosaival fizettessék meg. a nemzetközi gyakorlatból és a későbbi megoldásokból is az látszik, hogy a károk hatásainak felszámolását az állam finanszírozta. a rekul- tivációval azonban európában elbillent az erdők aránya a fenyvesek felé. magyaror- szágon is többször felhívták a figyelmet a szakemberek a monokultúrás telepítések hátrányaira. az 1993-as pilisvörösvári nagy erdőtűz rámutatott a fenyvesekkel járó közvetlen veszélyekre, ezután már lombos fákat telepítettek a kopárokra. az erdőirtások története arra hívja fel a figyelmet, hogy vannak olyan negatív externáliák, amelyeket a tevékenység végzésének idején nem lehet azonosítani. ezek- ben az esetekben nem megoldás az a törekvés, hogy internalizáljuk az externáliákat. erre a problémára a gazdasági tevékenységekre vonatkozó általános környezeti adó adhat megoldást.
    [Show full text]
  • Magyarország Településhálózata 1. Agglomerációk, Településegyüttesek Településhálózata 1
    Magyarország településhálózata 1. ÁR: 4 000 FT Agglomerációk, településegyüttesek Agglomerációk, településegyüttesek Magyarország településhálózata 1. INTERNETES MELLÉKLETTEL AAgglomeraciok_2014_borito_JO.inddgglomeraciok_2014_borito_JO.indd 1 22014.09.03.014.09.03. 99:55:46:55:46 AAgglomeraciok_2014_borito_JO.indd 2 g g l o m e r a c i Agglomerációk, településegyüttesek o k _ 2 0 1 4 _ b o r i t o _ J O . i n d d Miskolci 2 agglomeráció Nyíregyházi Soproni Salgótarjáni nagyvárosi nagyvárosi nagyvárosi településegyüttes településeggyütes Tatabányai településegyüttes nagyvárosi településegyüttes Egri agglomerálódó Győri Budapesti térség agglomeráció agglomeráció Debreceni nagyvárosi településegyüttes Szombathelyi agglomerálódó térség Dunaújvárosi Veszprémi nagyvárosi Szolnoki nagyvárosi településegyüttes nagyvárosi településegyüttes településegyüttes Zalaegerszegi Székesfehérvári Kecskeméti agglomerálódó nagyvárosi nagyvárosi térség Balatoni településegyüttes településegyüttes Békéscsabai agglomerálódó térség nagyvárosi településegyüttes Jelmagyarázat Nagykanizsai nagyvárosi Budapesti agglome- Kaposvári ráció településegyüttes nagyvárosi Szekszárdi településegyüttes nagyvárosi Agglomerációk településegyüttes Balatoni agglome- Szegedi rálódó térség nagyvárosi Agglomerálódó Pécsi térségek agglomeráció településegyüttes Nagyvárosi település- együttesek 22014.09.03. 9:55:49 0 1 4 . 0 9 . 0 3 . 9 : 5 5 : 4 9 MAGYARORSZÁG TELEPÜLÉSHÁLÓZATA 1. Agglomerációk, településegyüttesek MAGYARORSZÁG TELEPÜLÉSHÁLÓZATA 1. Agglomerációk, településegyüttesek
    [Show full text]