Water-Economic Problems in Northeastern Montenegro
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Case Northeastern Montenegro
Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 1(13) MOVEMENT POPULATION IN THE SECOND OF XX AND BEGINNING OF XXI CENTURY: THE CASE NORTHEASTERN MONTENEGRO Goran Rajovi ć, Jelisavka Bulatovi ć, Researchers College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] Phone: 0038161/19-24-850, 003861/ 3082651 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes population trends northeast of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. The population has increased in the period 1948- 2003 to 2.16%, but with a tendency to decline from 1981. The population in are period 1981- 2003, decreased by 14,674, or 21.16 %. Parameters of natural population indicate a negative trend. So the natural increase in 2003 in the municipality was Andrijevica - 4.6 ‰, in the municipality of Plav 4.21 ‰, and Berane 9.29 ‰, significantly lower than in the beginning of the seventies. Population migration indicates uneven density and population concentration. The existence of a large number of settlements up to 500 populations (81) is not suitable for modern flow to vital economic development of the region. KEYWORDS Northeastern Montenegro; Density of population; Natural change; Migration. Northeastern Montenegro covers an area of 1486 km² and the population census in 2003 there lived 54 658 inhabitants, or 36.8 in/ km². It covers three municipalities: Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. The paper provides a review and interpretation of the basic parameters of population trends northeastern of Montenegro in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century. Unlike the nineties of the last century, the population of the region during the seventies, moving out to a much lesser extent, we can explain the material well-being of the former Yugoslavia. -
Directory of Development Organizations
EDITION 2007 VOLUME III.B / EUROPE DIRECTORY OF DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, GOVERNMENTS, PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES, CIVIL SOCIETY, UNIVERSITIES, GRANTMAKERS, BANKS, MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING FIRMS Resource Guide to Development Organizations and the Internet Introduction Welcome to the directory of development organizations 2007, Volume III: Europe The directory of development organizations, listing 51.500 development organizations, has been prepared to facilitate international cooperation and knowledge sharing in development work, both among civil society organizations, research institutions, governments and the private sector. The directory aims to promote interaction and active partnerships among key development organisations in civil society, including NGOs, trade unions, faith-based organizations, indigenous peoples movements, foundations and research centres. In creating opportunities for dialogue with governments and private sector, civil society organizations are helping to amplify the voices of the poorest people in the decisions that affect their lives, improve development effectiveness and sustainability and hold governments and policymakers publicly accountable. In particular, the directory is intended to provide a comprehensive source of reference for development practitioners, researchers, donor employees, and policymakers who are committed to good governance, sustainable development and poverty reduction, through: the financial sector and microfinance, -
Anel NOVO 18.06.08 Sadrzaj:Layout 1.Qxd
Dr. Mustafa Memić GUSINJSKO-PLAVSKA KRAJINA U VRTLOGU HISTORIJE Sarajevo, 2008. IZDAVAČ: Institut za istraživanje zločina protiv čovječnosti i međunarodnog prava Univerziteta u Sarajevu ZA IZDAVAČA: prof. dr. Smail Čekić UREDNICI: dr. Safet Bandžović prof. mr. Muharem Kreso RECENZENTI: akademik Muhamed Filipović mr. Sefer Halilović LEKTOR: Sadžida Džuvić KORICE: Dževdet Nikočević DTP: Anel Ćuhara ŠTAMPARIJA: AMOS GRAF d.o.o. TIRAŽ: 500 PREDGOVOR Ovom knjigom želim objasniti neke od burnih događaja u mom rodnom kraju koji su bitno utjecali na formiranje nacionalne svijesti mojih sunarodnika i na njihov ekonomski i društveno-politički položaj poslije Drugog svjetskog rata. U narodu moga kraja duboko su urezana dva događaja. Jedan je osvajanje Gusinjsko-plavskog kraja od crnogorske vojske 1912, a drugi se odnosi na razdoblje od 1919. do 1945. Njima se objašnjava dolazak jednog puka srpske vojske, koji je poslije proboja Solunskog fronta nastupao vardarskom dolinom i od Skoplja i Kosovske Mitrovice uputio se prema Crnoj Gori. Pritom se prema Podgorici kretao preko Gusinjsko-plavske krajine, nakon čega je došlo do pobune Bošnjaka i Albanaca, te pokušaja uspostavljanja nove vlasti, a zatim do formiranja dviju vasojevićkih brigada - Donja i Gornja vasojevićka - koje su se kao paravojne jedinice pridružile srpskoj vojsci i djelovale pod rukovodstvom centralne Crnogorske uprave u Podgorici. Tom su prilikom u Plavu i Gusinju formirane i dvije vojne jedinice - dva bataljona - najprije kao komitske jedinice, koje su u početku djelovale u sastavu komitskog pokreta u Crnoj Gori. Strahovalo se da se uspostavljanjem njihove vlasti ne nametnu policijske vlasti, koje su tokom 1912-1913. počinile teške zločine (masovno strijeljanje – prema nekim podacima ubijeno je preko 8.000 Bošnjaka i Albanaca, a došlo je i do nasilnog pokrštavanja oko 12.500 ljudi). -
Socio Economic Analysis of Northern Montenegrin Region
SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO Podgorica, June 2008. FOUNDATION F OR THE DEVELOPMENT O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO (FORS) SOCIO -ECONOMIC ANLY S I S O F NORTHERN MONTENEGRO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR : Veselin Šturanović STUDY REVIEWER S : Emil Kočan, Nebojsa Babovic, FORS Montenegro; Zoran Radic, CHF Montenegro IN S TITUTE F OR STRATEGIC STUDIE S AND PROGNO S E S ISSP’S AUTHOR S TEAM : mr Jadranka Kaluđerović mr Ana Krsmanović mr Gordana Radojević mr Ivana Vojinović Milica Daković Ivan Jovetic Milika Mirković Vojin Golubović Mirza Mulešković Marija Orlandić All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means wit- hout the prior written permission of FORS Montenegro. Published with support from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the CHF International, Community Revitalization through Democratic Action – Economy (CRDA-E) program. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Agency for Interna- tional Development. For more information please contact FORS Montenegro by email at [email protected] or: FORS Montenegro, Berane FORS Montenegro, Podgorica Dušana Vujoševića Vaka Đurovića 84 84300, Berane, Montenegro 81000, Podgorica, Montenegro +382 51 235 977 +382 20 310 030 SOCIO ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NORTHERN REGION OF MONTENEGRO CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS: ............................................................................................................................................................... -
Z a K O N O Teritorijalnoj Organizaciji Crne Gore
Na osnovu člana 82 stav 1 ta čka 2 i člana 91 stav 2 Ustava Crne Gore, Skupština Crne Gore 24. saziva, na drugoj śednici drugog redovnog (jesenjeg) zasijedanja u 2011. godini, dana 2. novembra 2011. godine, donijela je Z A K O N O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZACIJI CRNE GORE I. OSNOVNE ODREDBE Član 1 Ovim zakonom ure đuju se teritorijalna organizacija Crne Gore, uslovi, na čin i postupak teritorijalnog organizovanja i druga pitanja od značaja za teritorijalnu organizaciju. Član 2 Teritorija opštine, Glavnog grada i Prijestonice (u daljem tekstu: jedinice lokalne samouprave) utvr đuje se ovim zakonom. Član 3 Teritorija jedinice lokalne samouprave i naziv opštine mogu se mijenjati u skladu sa ovim zakonom. II. TERITORIJALNA ORGANIZACIJA Član 4 Teritoriju jedinice lokalne samouprave čine naselja. Član 5 Teritorija Glavnog grada Podgorica, sa sjedištem u Podgorici, obuhvata Podgoricu kao naselje gradskog karaktera, naselja: Balo či, Begova Glavica, Bezjovo, Beri, Bigor, Bio če, Blizna, Bolesestra, Brežine, Bri đe, Brskut, Buronje, Crnci, Crvena Paprat, Cvilin, Ćafa, Ćepeti ći, Dajbabe, Dolovi, Doljani, Donja Gorica, Donje Strav če, Donji Kokoti, Draževina, Du čići, Duga, Đurkovi ći, Duške, Farmaci, Fundina, Goljemadi, Gornje Stravče, Gornji Kokoti, Gradac, Grbavci, Grbi Do, Kisjelica, Klopot, Kopilje, Kornet, Kosor, Krusi, Kržanja, Leki ći, Liješnje, Liješta, Lijeva Rijeka, Lopote, Lutovo, Lužnica, Medun, Milati, Mom če, Mrke, Opasanica, Orahovo, Oraovice, Orasi, Ožezi, Parci, Pelev Brijeg, Petrovi ći, Poprat, Prisoja, Progonovi ći, Ra ći, Rade -
USAID Economic Growth Project
USAID Economic Growth Project BACKGROUND The USAID Economic Growth Project is a 33-month initiative designed to increase economic opportunity in northern Montenegro. Through activities in 13 northern municipalities, the Economic Growth Project is promoting private-sector development to strengthen the competitiveness of the tourism sector, increase the competitiveness of agriculture and agribusiness, and improve the business-enabling environment at the municipal level. ACTIVITIES The project provides assistance to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, local tourist organizations, and business support service providers, as well as municipal governments to stimulate private sector growth. The project is: Strengthening the competitiveness of the tourism sector It is promoting the north as a tourist destination by supporting innovative service providers, building the region’s capacity to support tourism, assisting coordination with coastal tourism businesses, and expanding access to tourist information. Improving the viability of agriculture and agribusiness It is restoring agriculture as a viable economic activity by supporting agricultural producers and processors from the north to capitalize on market trends and generate more income. Bettering the business-enabling environment It is identifying barriers to doing business and assisting municipalities to execute plans to lower these obstacles by providing services and targeted investment. RESULTS 248 businesses have received assistance from Economic Growth Project (EGP)-supported activities. Sales of items produced by EGP-supported small businesses have increased by 15.8 percent since the project began. Linkages have been established between 111 Northern firms, as well as between Northern firms and Central and Southern firms. 26 EGP-assisted companies invested in improved technologies, 29 improved management practices, and 31 farmers, processors, and other firms adopted new technologies or management practices. -
Opština Br Bm Naziv Bm Upisano Andrijevica 1
OPŠTINA BR_BM NAZIV_BM UPISANO ANDRIJEVICA 1 ANDRIJEVICA, PEOVAC 764 ANDRIJEVICA 2 BOŽIĆE 159 ANDRIJEVICA 3 SEOCE 218 ANDRIJEVICA 4 BOJOVIĆE 83 ANDRIJEVICA 5 SUĆESKA, ANDŽELATE 109 ANDRIJEVICA 6 ĐULIĆE 89 ANDRIJEVICA 7 CECUNI 46 ANDRIJEVICA 8 KUTI 28 ANDRIJEVICA 9 KOŠUTIĆE 123 ANDRIJEVICA 10 KONJUHE 80 ANDRIJEVICA 11 JOŠANICA 62 ANDRIJEVICA 12 GRAČANICA 190 ANDRIJEVICA 13 ULOTINA, GORNJE LUGE 256 ANDRIJEVICA 14 PRISOJA 257 ANDRIJEVICA 15 KRALJE 224 ANDRIJEVICA 16 SJENOŽETA 36 ANDRIJEVICA 17 OBLO BRDO, ČUKA 53 ANDRIJEVICA 18 GNJILI POTOK 85 ANDRIJEVICA 19 SLATINA 302 ANDRIJEVICA 20 ZABRĐE 210 ANDRIJEVICA 21 TREŠNJEVO 424 ANDRIJEVICA 22 TREPČA 157 ANDRIJEVICA 23 RIJEKA MARSENIĆA, NAVOTINA 237 BAR 1 DOM KULTURE "VLADIMIR POPOVIĆ ŠPANAC" - BAR 604 BAR 2 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 735 BAR 3 GIMNAZIJA "NIKO ROLOVIĆ" - BAR 770 BAR 4 OŠ "BLAŽO JOKOV ORLANDIĆ" - BAR 845 BAR 5 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "JUGOSLAVIJA" - BAR 923 BAR 6 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA BAR II-POLJE NA TABIJI 856 BAR 7 DJEČIJI VRTIĆ NA TABIJI 746 BAR 8 PREDUZEĆE RUMIJATRANS 536 BAR 9 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 982 BAR 10 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MEKSIKO" - BAR 894 BAR 11 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "BAR V-SUTORMAN" 982 BAR 12 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 954 BAR 13 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "ANTO ĐEDOVIĆ" - BAR 780 BAR 14 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "KEKEC" - SUTOMORE 901 BAR 15 PRIBOJSKO ODMARALIŠTE - SUTOMORE 614 BAR 16 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "MIŠIĆI" 308 BAR 17 MJESNA ZAJEDNICA "STARI BAR" 838 BAR 18 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA "SRBIJA" 359 BAR 19 PRIMORKA 368 BAR 20 OMLADINSKI DOM MIROVICA 522 BAR 21 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA ZALJEVO 824 BAR 22 OSNOVNA ŠKOLA -
The Case Northeastern Montenegro
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by InfinityPress Journal of Studies in Social Sciences ISSN 2201-4624 Volume 2 (2013), Number 1, 1-30 Analysis of Change in Population Structure: The Case Northeastern Montenegro Goran Rajović (Corresponding author) Street Vojvode Stepe No. 252, Beograd Jelisavka Bulatović College of Textile Design, Technology and Management, Street Starine Novaka No.20, Belgrade, Serbia Abstract: This paper analyzes changes in the demographic structure of population in northeastern Montenegro, in the example of the municipality Berane, Andrijevica and Plav. Population age structure is changing, and takes unfavorable characteristics, reduces the proportion of younger and increases the proportion of elderly population. Disturbed age structure has a reverse effect on the movement of the population (the size of reproductive contingent), but also to all other population structure (size of contingent employment, population, mandatory school contingent, relationship maintenance). Despite significant changes in the demographic structures of all northeastern Montenegro, retains the characteristics of ethnically very heterogeneous environment. Keywords: Northeastern Montenegro, population, population structure INTRODUCTION Question of the relationship between the economy and population can be approached from many sides, because of so much importance to attract the attention of many scientific disciplines. But, if the component is "population" in its demographic organic content, it is apparently possible to approach this issue as follows: from the standpoint 2 Journal of Studies in Social Sciences of economics, from the standpoint of science and interdisciplinary population - economic and demographic standpoint. Our interest here is not the first and the second approach, although of great theoretical and practical importance. -
Medium–Term Programme
REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO MINISTRY OF FINANCE REAL ESTATE ADMINISTRATION MEDIUM–TERM PROGRAMME WORKS ON SURVEY AND DESIGN OF THE REAL ESTATE CADASTRE FOR PERIOD 2008 - 2013 Zavrsen premjer- finished survey Nije premjereno- not surveyed P o d g o r i c a July, 2007. Zavrsen premjer- finished survey Planiran premjer- planned survey Nije premjereno- not surveyed Pursuant to the Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Law on State Survey and Real Estate Cadastre (“Official gazette of the RoM”, No.29/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro has adopted at the Session, held on 26 th July 2007 MEDIUM-TERM PROGRAMME OF WORKS ON SURVEY AND DESIGN OF REAL ESTATE CADASTRE FOR PERIOD 2008 - 2013 I GENERAL TERMS It is stipulated by the Provision of the Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Law on State Survey and Real Estate Cadastre ("Official gazette of the RoM", No. 29/07) - hereinafter referred to as the Law, that works of state survey and design and maintenance of the real estate cadastre is performed on the base of medium-term and annual work programmes. Medium-term work programme for period 1 st January 2008 to 1 st January 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Programme) directs further development of the state survey and real estate cadastre for the Republic of Montenegro in the next five years and it determines the type and scope of works, and the scope of funds for their realisation. Funds for realisation of the Programme are provided in accordance with the Article 176 of the Law. Annual work programmes are made on the base of the Programme. -
THE MOUNTAINS of ALBANIA. by C. M. Sleeman
The Mountains of A lhan~a. 55 THE MouNTAINS oF ALBANIA. BY C. M. SLEEMAN. NE September evening in 1926 our party found itself on the top of Ljubotin,l a mountain of the Shar-dagh range in Jugoslavia. We had reached this fine mountain (its name signifies the Thorn-shaped One) from Kacanik, a village some 20 miles N.W. of Skoplje, and had arrived at the summit just before sunset. Spread out before us was a great blaze of light, and far into theW. we saw range after range of hills stretching into what we knew must be Albanian country. We felt then that, apart from all other interests, Albania must be visited if only for its mountains. Balkan mountain _travel has its own peculiar fascination : of this we had already had some experience in several wander ings through the mountains of Jugoslavia, Bulgaria, and northern Greece ; but, as investigation soon showed, the matter of attacking Albania was a tougher problem. The few travellers who have been through the northern parts of the country from Prizren to Scutari have given descriptions of magnificent Dolomite-like peaks rising up away to the N. of their routes, and there are some accounts of journeys made into the valleys and across some of the passes of the northern mountains ; but all the available literature and the 1p.aps are vague and not very helpful from the point of view of mountaineering. In Vol. 17 of the ALPINE JouRNAL W. H. Cozens-Hardy has an article on ' The Mountains of Montenegro and Albania,' but, as he only saw the mountains of the latter country from across the Montenegrin frontier, his account is rather an inspiration to would-be travellers than a description of things done. -
Municipal Assembly, Budget, General Information, Public Procurement, Public Discussions and Public Competitions
1 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Podgorica, 2020 TRANSPARENCY INDEX OF MONTENEGRIN MUNICIPALITIES Publisher: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Editor: Daliborka Uljarević Lead author: Mira Popović Co-authors: Maja Marinović Ana Nenezić Research Associate: Vasilije Radulović Design and Production: Centar za građansko obrazovanje (CGO) Print: 170 primjeraka The report is part of the project “Let’s put corruption in the museum!” implemented by the Centre for Civic Education (CCE) in partnership with NGO Centre for Monitoring and Research (CeMI), NGO Bonum from Pljevlja, NGO UL-Info from Ulcinj and NGO Za Druga from Petrovac, in cooperation with the Ministry of Public Administration and the Agency for Prevention Corruption (APC), funded by the European Union with co-financing from the Ministry of Public Administration. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the CCE and CEMI and in no manner can it be interpreted as an official position of the European Union or the Ministry of Public Administration. SADRŽAJ Introduction 6 Methodology 7 General assessment of the state of transparency of municipalities in Montenegro 11 How transparent are Montenegrin municipalities? 16 • Andrijevica 17 • Bar 20 • Berane 23 • Bijelo Polje 26 • Budva 29 • Cetinje 32 • Danilovgrad 35 • Golubovci 38 • Gusinje 41 • Herceg Novi 44 • Kolašin 47 • Kotor 50 • Mojkovac 53 • Nikšić 56 • Petnjica 59 • Plav 62 • Pljevlja 65 • Plužine 68 • Podgorica 71 • Rožaje 74 • Šavnik 77 • Tivat 80 • Tuzi 83 • Ulcinj 86 • Žabljak 89 Research 92 Final remarks 101 6 INTRODUCTION Fight against corruption requires a multidisciplinary, continuous and multifaceted approach, and one of the preconditions is a high degree of transparency in the work of public sector bodies. -
OPŠTINA BERANE Lokalni Plan Upravljanja Komunalnim I
OPŠTINA BERANE Lokalni plan upravljanja komunalnim i neopasnim građevinskim otpadom za period 2016 – 2020 Berane, avgust 2016 1 Sadržaj Predgovor REZIME 1. UVOD 1.1. Metodologija izrade Plana 1.2. Značenje izraza 2 ZAKONODAVNO-PRAVNI OKVIR 2.1. Zakonodavstvo u oblasti upravljanja otpadom 2.2. Strateški dokumenti 3 INSTITUCIONALNI OKVIR 4 PROFIL OPŠTINE BERANE 4.1 Istorijat Berana 4.2 Geografski položaj 4.3 Pedološke karakteristike 4.4 Geomorfološke karakteristike 4.5 Klimatske karakteristike 4.6 Demografija 4.7 Obrazovanje 4.8 Zdravstveni sistem 4.9 Ekonomsko proizvodni sistem 4.10 Poljoprivreda 4.11 Šumarstvo 4.12 Turizam 4.13 Životna sredina 4.13.1 Vazduh 4.13.2 Vode 4.13.3 Zemljište 4.13.4 Mineralne sirovine 4.13.5 Biodiverzitet 4.13.6 Količina vode u sistemu vodosnabdijevanja 4.13.7 Kanalizacioni sistem 4.13.8 Zelene površine 4.14 Zaštićeno područje 5 ANALIZA STANJA I OCJENA DOSADAŠNJE PRAKSE UPRAVLJANJA OTPADOM 5.1. KOMUNALNI OTPAD 5.1.1. GENERISANJE KOMUNALNOG OTPADA – količine, sastav i karakteristike otpada 5.1.2. SAKUPLJANJE I TRANSPORT KOMUNALNOG OTPADA 5.1.3. PONOVNA UPOTREBA I RECIKLAŽA 5.1.4. ODLAGANJE OTPADA 5.1.4.1 Lokacije za privremeno skladištenje komunalnog otpada 5.1.4.2. Neuređena odlagališta otpada 5.2. Opasni otpad iz domaćinstava 5.3. Otpadna ambalaža 5.4. Građevinski otpad 5.5 Porijeklo otpada 2 6 UPRAVLJANJE OTPADOM U NAREDNOM PERIODU 6.1. PROCJENA BUDUĆIH KRETANJA U OBLASTI GENERISANJA I UPRAVLJANJA OTPADOM OTPADA 6.2. CILJEVI KOJE TREBA OSTVARITI U DOMENU UPRAVLJANJA OTPADOM 6.3. UPRAVLJANJE KOMUNALNIM OTPADOM 6.3.1.