DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2108.00269V1 [Math.QA] 31 Jul 2021 Quantum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2108.00269V1 [Math.QA] 31 Jul 2021 Quantum Quantum Representation Theory and Manin matrices I: finite-dimensional case Alexey Silantyev∗ Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia State University ”Dubna”, 141980 Dubna, Moscow region, Russia Abstract We construct Quantum Representation Theory which describes quantum analogue of representations in frame of ‘non-commutative linear geometry’ developed by Manin in [Man88]. To do it we generalise the internal hom-functor to the case of adjunction with a parameter and construct a general approach to representations of a monoid in a symmetric monoidal category with a parameter subcategory. Quantum Representation Theory is obtained by application of this approach to a monoidal category of some class of graded algebras with Manin product, where the parameter subcategory consists of connected finitely generated quadratic algebras. We formulate this theory in the language of Manin matrices and obtain quantum analogues of direct sum and tensor product of representations. Finally, we give some examples of quantum representations. Keywords: quadratic algebras; Manin matrices; quantum groups; non-commutative spaces; Representation Theory; monoidal categories. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Preliminaries 4 2.1 Vectorspacesandalgebras. 4 arXiv:2108.00269v2 [math.QA] 24 Sep 2021 2.2 Algebraicsetsandaffineschemes . 6 2.3 Monoidalcategoriesandfunctors . .. 8 2.4 Monoidsandtheiractions ............................ 11 2.5 Monoids and groups in a category with finite products . ... 17 ∗[email protected] 1 3 Internal hom and representations 19 3.1 Internal (co)hom-functor and its generalisation . ....... 19 3.2 (Co)representationsof(co)monoids . .... 23 3.3 Translation of (co)representations under monoidal functors .......... 27 4 Quantum linear spaces 30 4.1 Operations with quadratic algebras . 31 4.2 Maninmatrices .................................. 37 4.3 Semi-linear spaces and their quantum analogue . .. 39 4.4 Internalhomforquantumlinearspaces . ... 44 5 Quantum Representation Theory 50 5.1 Quantumrepresentations. 50 5.2 Operationswithquantumrepresentations. .... 55 5.3 S∗-embedding of classical representations . 64 5.4 T ∗-embedding of classical representations . 70 6 Examples 72 6.1 Corepresentations of Mq(m)........................... 72 6.2 An extension of the Yangian Y (glm)anditscorepresentations . 74 6.3 Corepresentations of an extended Y (som).................... 76 Conclusion and further directions 77 1 Introduction In the end of 80s Yuri Manin generalised the notion of finite-dimensional vector (linear) space to the quantum1 case [Man88]. He introduced the term ‘quantum linear spaces’ for (finitely generated connected) quadratic algebras considered as objects of the opposite category. The usual finite-dimensional vector spaces correspond to the polynomial algebras. Manin defined four binary operations with quadratic algebras, they where denoted by ◦, •, ⊗, ⊗. He also introduced a duality of quadratic algebras, which coincides with the Koszul duality for the quadratic Koszul algebras (see [Man87, Man88, Man91]). The most important binary operation for our purposes is ‘◦’, which we call ‘Manin white product’ or just ‘Manin product’. As it was shown in [Man88] the category of quantum linear spaces with these product is a closed monoidal category and that the internal hom can be written via the Koszul duality and the binary operation ‘•’, which is called ‘black 1We use the word ‘quantum’ instead of ‘non-commutative’ in the sense of non-commutative spaces by following Manin [Man88] and Drinfeld [Dr], because sometimes the word ‘non-commutative’ is confusing. For example, the term ‘non-commutative group’ does not mean a non-commutative space with a group structure (i.e. a quantum group), but rather a non-abelian group. Moreover, we want to consider the usual ‘commutative’ spaces as a particular case of the non-commutative ones. 2 Manin product’. This gives a construction of the internal hom-object as a quadratic algebra generated by entries of some matrix. It turned out that the description of the internal hom-object for the polynomial algebras gives some non-trivial commutation relations for the entries of this matrix. The matri- ces (over a non-commutative ring in general) satisfying these commutation relations were called ‘Manin matrices’ in [CF]. A lot of their interesting properties and applications were found [CF, CM, CFR, RST]. The properties and applications of q-analogues of Manin ma- trices were considered in [GLZ, CFRS, IO]. The super-version and Manin matrices for the series B, C, D were considered in [Man89, Man91, Man92, MR] and [Molev] respectively. The notion of Manin matrices was generalised in [S]. It was shown that any quadratic algebra can be given by a matrix idempotent A acting in a tensor product of a vector space. This algebra was denoted by XA(K), where K is a basic field. Then it was defined a Manin matrix for a pair of idempotents A and B and showed how this notion can be associated to the pair of quadratic algebras XA(K) and XB(K). The main aim of this paper is to generalise Representation Theory to the case of a quantum representation space. The objects which are to be represented (such as algebras, groups, algebraic groups) are generalised up to ‘quantum algebras’ (these include quantum groups). To do it we formulate a general representation theory in a monoidal category with some generalisation of internal hom-functor. For such category the representations of a monoid can be functorially identified with left actions of this monoid on some objects. In a particular case this approach gives Quantum Representation Theory: we need to take the monoidal category of quadratic algebras with the Manin product ‘◦’ together with some extension of this category, where the category of quadratic algebras plays the role of parameter subcat- egory. This extension is needed to include the representations of quantum groups. As a ‘classical’ representation can be given by a square matrix in a basis of the representation space, a quantum representation is given by a Manin matrix for the pair of idempotents A and B, where A = B. This work is mainly devoted to the finite-dimensional case. In the quantum level this means that the algebras A we consider are finitely generated and, as consequence, all the graded components Ak of these algebras are finite-dimensional vector spaces. For wider gen- erality we sometimes include the infinite-dimensional (infinitely generated) case into consid- eration, but here we do not define quantum representations on infinitely generated quadratic algebras. The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we give basic notations and definitions including theory of monoids and their actions. In Section 3 we describe the general approach to construct representation theory in a monoidal category by using the generalised internal hom. Since it is convenient to work in an opposite category we also define the dual notions: generalised internal cohom, corepresentations etc. Section 4 prepares the necessary notions and facts for the quantum representation theory: the Manin’s concept of quantum linear spaces, operations with quadratic algebras, semi-linear spaces and its quantum version, the 3 internal cohom for quadratic algebras and its generalisation. Section 5 is devoted to the description of the quantum representations, to the consideration of classical representations as quantum ones and to binary operations with the quantum representations. In Section 6 we give some examples of quantum representations. Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to A. Isaev, Y. Manin for useful references and to E. Patrin for discussions. The author particularly appreciates advice and guidance from V. Rubtsov. 2 Preliminaries 2.1 Vector spaces and algebras Fist of all, let us fix some terms and notations that we use in this work. 2.1.1. Basic field. Let K be a field such that char K =6 2. All the vector spaces will be over K. For two vector spaces V and W we denote by V ⊗ W = V ⊗K W their tensor product over K. For briefness we say ‘algebra’ for a unital associative algebra over K and we suppose that algebra homomorphisms map unity to unity. The unity of an algebra A we denote by 1 or 1A. 2.1.2. Notations for morphisms in a category. We denote the composition of mor- phisms f : Y → Z and g : X → Y in a category C by f · g. We do not use the symbol ‘◦’ for composition, because it will be used for the Manin product. For a natural transformation θ between functors F and G we sometimes omit the subscript of its components θX : FX → GX. In particular, for a morphism f : Y → Z we denote by ∗ f∗ and f the maps f∗ : Hom(X,Y ) → Hom(X,Z), f∗(g)= f · g : X → Z, g : X → Y, (2.1) f ∗ : Hom(Z,X) → Hom(Y,X), f ∗(h)= h · f : Y → X, h: Z → X. (2.2) They are the components of the natural transformations Hom(−,Y ) → Hom(−,Z) and Hom(Z, −) → Hom(Y, −) respectively. 2.1.3. Basis. A basis of a vector space V is a map e: I → V from a set I (which may be infinite) such that for any vector space W and any map f : I → W there exists a unique linear map h: V → W satisfying h · e = f. The basis e: I → V is denoted by (ei)i∈I or (ei), where ei is the value of e on i ∈ I. In the case of the set I = {1,...,n} we also use n the notation (ei)i=1. One can check that (ei)i∈I is a basis of V iff the elements ei ∈ V are pairwise different, the set {ei | i ∈ I} = e(I) is linear independent and any vector v ∈ V is K a finite linear combination of the form i αiei where αi ∈ . Notice that the basis (ei) is ′ not just a set, because the permutationP of the elements ei gives another basis (ei) with the ′ same set {ei} = {ei}. 4 2.1.4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Operad Theory
    AN INTRODUCTION TO OPERAD THEORY SAIMA SAMCHUCK-SCHNARCH Abstract. We give an introduction to category theory and operad theory aimed at the undergraduate level. We first explore operads in the category of sets, and then generalize to other familiar categories. Finally, we develop tools to construct operads via generators and relations, and provide several examples of operads in various categories. Throughout, we highlight the ways in which operads can be seen to encode the properties of algebraic structures across different categories. Contents 1. Introduction1 2. Preliminary Definitions2 2.1. Algebraic Structures2 2.2. Category Theory4 3. Operads in the Category of Sets 12 3.1. Basic Definitions 13 3.2. Tree Diagram Visualizations 14 3.3. Morphisms and Algebras over Operads of Sets 17 4. General Operads 22 4.1. Basic Definitions 22 4.2. Morphisms and Algebras over General Operads 27 5. Operads via Generators and Relations 33 5.1. Quotient Operads and Free Operads 33 5.2. More Examples of Operads 38 5.3. Coloured Operads 43 References 44 1. Introduction Sets equipped with operations are ubiquitous in mathematics, and many familiar operati- ons share key properties. For instance, the addition of real numbers, composition of functions, and concatenation of strings are all associative operations with an identity element. In other words, all three are examples of monoids. Rather than working with particular examples of sets and operations directly, it is often more convenient to abstract out their common pro- perties and work with algebraic structures instead. For instance, one can prove that in any monoid, arbitrarily long products x1x2 ··· xn have an unambiguous value, and thus brackets 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivariant De Rham Cohomology and Gauged Field Theories
    Equivariant de Rham cohomology and gauged field theories August 15, 2013 Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Differential forms and de Rham cohomology . .2 1.2 A commercial for supermanifolds . .3 1.3 Topological field theories . .5 2 Super vector spaces, super algebras and super Lie algebras 11 2.1 Super algebras . 12 2.2 Super Lie algebra . 14 3 A categorical Digression 15 3.1 Monoidal categories . 15 3.2 Symmetric monoidal categories . 17 4 Supermanifolds 19 4.1 Definition and examples of supermanifolds . 19 4.2 Super Lie groups and their Lie algebras . 23 4.3 Determining maps from a supermanifold to Rpjq ................ 26 5 Mapping supermanifolds and the functor of points formalism 31 5.1 Internal hom objects . 32 5.2 The functor of points formalism . 34 5.3 The supermanifold of endomorphisms of R0j1 .................. 36 5.4 Vector bundles on supermanifolds . 37 5.5 The supermanifold of maps R0j1 ! X ...................... 41 5.6 The algebra of functions on a generalized supermanifold . 43 1 1 INTRODUCTION 2 6 Gauged field theories and equivariant de Rham cohomology 47 6.1 Equivariant cohomology . 47 6.2 Differential forms on G-manifolds. 49 6.3 The Weil algebra . 53 6.4 A geometric interpretation of the Weil algebra . 57 1 Introduction 1.1 Differential forms and de Rham cohomology Let X be a smooth manifold of dimension n. We recall that Ωk(X) := C1(X; ΛkT ∗X) is the vector space of differential k-forms on X. What is the available structure on differential forms? 1. There is the wedge product Ωk(M) ⊗ Ω`(M) −!^ Ωk+`(X) induced by a vector bundle homomorphism ΛkT ∗X ⊗ Λ`T ∗X −! Λk+`T ∗X ∗ Ln k This gives Ω (X) := k=0 Ω (X) the structure of a Z-graded algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Linear Algebra and Its Applications: 2010–2019
    A Complete Bibliography of Publications in Linear Algebra and its Applications: 2010{2019 Nelson H. F. Beebe University of Utah Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB 155 S 1400 E RM 233 Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090 USA Tel: +1 801 581 5254 FAX: +1 801 581 4148 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] (Internet) WWW URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe/ 12 March 2021 Version 1.74 Title word cross-reference KY14, Rim12, Rud12, YHH12, vdH14]. 24 [KAAK11]. 2n − 3[BCS10,ˇ Hil13]. 2 × 2 [CGRVC13, CGSCZ10, CM14, DW11, DMS10, JK11, KJK13, MSvW12, Yan14]. (−1; 1) [AAFG12].´ (0; 1) 2 × 2 × 2 [Ber13b]. 3 [BBS12b, NP10, Ghe14a]. (2; 2; 0) [BZWL13, Bre14, CILL12, CKAC14, Fri12, [CI13, PH12]. (A; B) [PP13b]. (α, β) GOvdD14, GX12a, Kal13b, KK14, YHH12]. [HW11, HZM10]. (C; λ; µ)[dMR12].(`; m) p 3n2 − 2 2n3=2 − 3n [MR13]. [DFG10]. (H; m)[BOZ10].(κ, τ) p 3n2 − 2 2n3=23n [MR14a]. 3 × 3 [CSZ10, CR10c]. (λ, 2) [BBS12b]. (m; s; 0) [Dru14, GLZ14, Sev14]. 3 × 3 × 2 [Ber13b]. [GH13b]. (n − 3) [CGO10]. (n − 3; 2; 1) 3 × 3 × 3 [BH13b]. 4 [Ban13a, BDK11, [CCGR13]. (!) [CL12a]. (P; R)[KNS14]. BZ12b, CK13a, FP14, NSW13, Nor14]. 4 × 4 (R; S )[Tre12].−1 [LZG14]. 0 [AKZ13, σ [CJR11]. 5 Ano12-30, CGGS13, DLMZ14, Wu10a]. 1 [BH13b, CHY12, KRH14, Kol13, MW14a]. [Ano12-30, AHL+14, CGGS13, GM14, 5 × 5 [BAD09, DA10, Hil12a, Spe11]. 5 × n Kal13b, LM12, Wu10a]. 1=n [CNPP12]. [CJR11]. 6 1 <t<2 [Seo14]. 2 [AIS14, AM14, AKA13, [DK13c, DK11, DK12a, DK13b, Kar11a].
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Superrings and Supergroups
    DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation Superrings and Supergroups Verfasser Dr. Dennis Bouke Westra zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr.rer.nat.) Wien, Oktober 2009 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 091 405 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Mathematik Betreuer: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Michor Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Anexample....................................... .. 1 1.2 Motivation ...................................... ... 1 1.3 Plan............................................ 2 1.4 Notationandconventions . ....... 2 2 Super vector spaces 5 2.1 Supervectorspaces............................... ...... 5 2.2 Liesuperalgebras................................ ...... 7 3 Basics of superrings and supermodules 11 3.1 Superringsandsuperalgebras . ......... 11 3.2 Supermodules.................................... .... 15 3.3 Noetheriansuperrings . ....... 17 3.4 Artiniansuperrings. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....... 20 3.5 Splitsuperrings................................. ...... 22 3.6 Grassmannenvelopes.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... 23 3.7 Freemodulesandsupermatrices . ........ 24 4 Primes and primaries 29 4.1 Propertiesofprimeideals . ........ 29 4.2 Primary ideals and primary decompositions . ............ 35 4.3 Primarydecompositions . ....... 36 5 Localization and completion 39 5.1 Localization.................................... ..... 39 5.2 Application to Artinian superrings . ........... 45 5.3 Geometricsuperalgebras. ........ 46 5.4 Superschemes...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Weight Q2(ℂ)-Supermodules
    U.U.D.M. Project Report 2009:12 Simple weight q2( )-supermodules Ekaterina Orekhova ℂ Examensarbete i matematik, 30 hp Handledare och examinator: Volodymyr Mazorchuk Juni 2009 Department of Mathematics Uppsala University Simple weight q2(C)-supermodules Ekaterina Orekhova June 6, 2009 1 Abstract The first part of this paper gives the definition and basic properties of the queer Lie superalgebra q2(C). This is followed by a complete classification of simple h-supermodules, which leads to a classification of all simple high- est and lowest weight q2(C)-supermodules. The paper also describes the structure of all Verma supermodules for q2(C) and gives a classification of finite-dimensional q2(C)-supermodules. 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 General definitions . 4 1.2 The queer Lie superalgebra q2(C)................ 5 2 Classification of simple h-supermodules 6 3 Properties of weight q-supermodules 11 4 Universal enveloping algebra U(q) 13 5 Simple highest weight q-supermodules 15 5.1 Definition and properties of Verma supermodules . 15 5.2 Structure of typical Verma supermodules . 27 5.3 Structure of atypical Verma supermodules . 28 6 Finite-Dimensional simple weight q-supermodules 31 7 Simple lowest weight q-supermodules 31 3 1 Introduction Significant study of the characters and blocks of the category O of the queer Lie superalgebra qn(C) has been done by Brundan [Br], Frisk [Fr], Penkov [Pe], Penkov and Serganova [PS1], and Sergeev [Se1]. This paper focuses on the case n = 2 and gives explicit formulas, diagrams, and classification results for simple lowest and highest weight q2(C) supermodules.
    [Show full text]
  • Bases of Infinite-Dimensional Representations Of
    BASES OF INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS by DWIGHT ANDERSON WILLIAMS II Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2020 Copyright c by Dwight Anderson Williams II 2020 All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS God is the only mathematician who should say that the proof is trivial. Thank you God for showing me well-timed hints and a few nearly-complete solutions. \The beginning of the beginning." Thank you Dimitar Grantcharov for advising me, for allowing your great sense of humor, kindness, brilliance, respect, and mathe- matical excellence to easily surpass your great height{it is an honor to look up to you and to look forward towards continued collaboration. Work done by committee Thank you to my committe members (alphabetically listed by surname): Edray Goins, David Jorgensen, Christopher Kribs, Barbara Shipman, and Michaela Vancliff. April 30, 2020 iii ABSTRACT BASES OF INFINITE-DIMENSIONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ORTHOSYMPLECTIC LIE SUPERALGEBRAS Dwight Anderson Williams II, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Arlington, 2020 Supervising Professor: Dimitar Grantcharov We provide explicit bases of representations of the Lie superalgebra osp(1j2n) obtained by taking tensor products of infinite-dimensional representation and the standard representation. This infinite-dimensional representation is the space of polynomials C[x1; : : : ; xn]. Also, we provide a new differential operator realization of osp(1j2n) in terms of differential operators of n commuting variables x1; : : : ; xn and 2n anti-commuting variables ξ1; : : : ; ξ2n.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1907.02135V1 [Math.RA] 3 Jul 2019
    THE UNIVERSAL ENVELOPING ALGEBRA OF sl2 AND THE RACAH ALGEBRA SARAH BOCKTING-CONRAD AND HAU-WEN HUANG Abstract. Let F denote a field with char F 6= 2. The Racah algebra ℜ is the unital asso- ciative F-algebra defined by generators and relations in the following way. The generators are A, B, C, D. The relations assert that [A, B] = [B, C] = [C, A]=2D and each of the elements α = [A, D]+ AC − BA, β = [B,D]+ BA − CB, γ = [C,D]+ CB − AC is central in ℜ. Additionally the element δ = A + B + C is central in ℜ. In this paper we explore the relationship between the Racah algebra ℜ and the universal enveloping algebra U(sl2). Let a,b,c denote mutually commuting indeterminates. We show that there exists a unique F-algebra homomorphism ♮ : ℜ → F[a,b,c] ⊗F U(sl2) that sends A 7→ a(a + 1) ⊗ 1 + (b − c − a) ⊗ x + (a + b − c + 1) ⊗ y − 1 ⊗ xy, B 7→ b(b + 1) ⊗ 1 + (c − a − b) ⊗ y + (b + c − a + 1) ⊗ z − 1 ⊗ yz, C 7→ c(c + 1) ⊗ 1 + (a − b − c) ⊗ z + (c + a − b + 1) ⊗ x − 1 ⊗ zx, D 7→ 1 ⊗ (zyx + zx) + (c + b(c + a − b)) ⊗ x + (a + c(a + b − c)) ⊗ y +(b + a(b + c − a)) ⊗ z + (b − c) ⊗ xy + (c − a) ⊗ yz + (a − b) ⊗ zx, where x,y,z are the equitable generators for U(sl2). We additionally give the images of α, β, γ, δ, and certain Casimir elements of ℜ under ♮. We also show that the map ♮ is an injection and thus provides an embedding of ℜ into F[a,b,c] ⊗ U(sl2).
    [Show full text]
  • A View of Symplectic Lie Algebras from Quadratic Poisson Algebras
    Bolet´ınde Matem´aticas 26(1) 1{30 (2019) 1 A view of symplectic Lie algebras from quadratic Poisson algebras Una mirada a las ´algebrasde Lie simplecticas desde las ´algebrasde Poisson cuadr´aticas Andr´esRia~no1;a, Armando Reyes1;b Abstract. Using the concept of double extension, Benayadi [2] showed how to construct a new quadratic algebra (g(A);T ) given a quadratic algebra (A;B). With both algebras and an invertible skew-symmetric algebra D over A, he en- dowed (A;B) with a simplectic structure through a bilinear form !, obtaining a simplectic algebra (g(A);T; Ω). Our purpose in this short communication is to show the construction given by Benayadi and present the complete develop- ment of each one of his assertions. We remark that this communication does not have original results and it was made as a result of the undergraduated work titled “Construcci´onde ´algebrasde Lie simpl´ecticasdesde ´algebrasde Poisson cuadr´aticas"[5],which was awarded as the best mathematics under- graduated thesis in the XXVI Contest at Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogot´a.The work was written by the first author under the direction of the second author. Keywords: Lie algebra, Poisson algebra, quadratic algebra, symplectic alge- bra. Resumen. A partir del concepto de doble extensi´on,Benayadi [2] mostr´o c´omoconstruir una nueva ´algebracuadr´atica(g(A);T ), a partir de un ´algebra cuadr´aticadada (A;B). Con estas dos ´algebrasy una derivaci´oninvertible anti-sim´etrica D sobre A, ´eldot´oa (A;B) de una estructura simpl´ectica a traves de una forma bilineal !, obteniendo as´ı una ´algebrasimpl´ectica (g(A);T; Ω).
    [Show full text]
  • Manin Matrices, Casimir Elements and Sugawara Operators
    Manin matrices, Casimir elements and Sugawara operators Alexander Molev University of Sydney 1 I Origins and motivations. I Basic properties of Manin matrices. I Applications: I Casimir elements for gln. I Segal–Sugawara vectors for gln. Plan 2 I Basic properties of Manin matrices. I Applications: I Casimir elements for gln. I Segal–Sugawara vectors for gln. Plan I Origins and motivations. 2 I Applications: I Casimir elements for gln. I Segal–Sugawara vectors for gln. Plan I Origins and motivations. I Basic properties of Manin matrices. 2 I Segal–Sugawara vectors for gln. Plan I Origins and motivations. I Basic properties of Manin matrices. I Applications: I Casimir elements for gln. 2 Plan I Origins and motivations. I Basic properties of Manin matrices. I Applications: I Casimir elements for gln. I Segal–Sugawara vectors for gln. 2 By the seminal works of V. Drinfeld (1985) and M. Jimbo (1985), the universal enveloping algebra U(g) of a simple Lie algebra g admits a deformation Uq(g) in the class of Hopf algebras. The dual Hopf algebras are quantized algebras of functions Funq(G) on the associated Lie group G [N. Reshetikhin, L. Takhtajan and L. Faddeev 1990]. A detailed review of the theory and applications: V. Chari and A. Pressley, A guide to quantum groups, 1994. Quantum groups 3 The dual Hopf algebras are quantized algebras of functions Funq(G) on the associated Lie group G [N. Reshetikhin, L. Takhtajan and L. Faddeev 1990]. A detailed review of the theory and applications: V. Chari and A. Pressley, A guide to quantum groups, 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix Computations in Linear Superalgebra Institute De Znvestigaciones En Matemhticas Aplicadas Y Sistemus Universidad Nacionul
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Matrix Computations in Linear Superalgebra Oscar Adolf0 Sanchez Valenzuela* Institute de Znvestigaciones en Matemhticas Aplicadas y Sistemus Universidad Nacionul Authwmu de M&co Apdo, Postal 20-726; Admon. No. 20 Deleg. Alvaro Obreg6n 01000 M&ico D.F., M&co Submitted by Marvin D. Marcus ABSTRACT The notions of supervector space, superalgebra, supermodule, and finite dimen- sional free super-module over a supercommutative superalgebra are reviewed. Then, a functorial correspondence is established between (free) supermodule morphisms and matrices with coefficients in the corresponding supercommutative superalgebra. It is shown that functoriality requires the rule for matrix multiplication to be different from the usual one. It has the advantage, however, of making the analogues of the nongraded formulas retain their familiar form (the chain rule is but one example of this). INTRODUCTION This paper is intended to serve as reference for definitions and conven- tions behind our work in super-manifolds: [6], [7], and [8]. More important perhaps, is the fact that we show here how computations have to be carried out in a consistent way within the category of supermodules over a super- commutative superalgebra-a point that has not been stressed in the litera- ture so far., To begin with, we shall adhere to the standard usage of the prefix super by letting it stand for Z,-graded, as in [l]. Thus, we shall review the notions *Current address: Centro de Investigacibn en Matemiticas, CIMAT, Apartado Postal 402, C.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Scrambled Linear Pseudorandom Number Generators∗
    Scrambled Linear Pseudorandom Number Generators∗ DAVID BLACKMAN, Independent researcher, Australia SEBASTIANO VIGNA, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy Linear pseudorandom number generators are very popular due to their high speed, to the ease with which generators with a sizable state space can be created, and to their provable theoretical properties. However, they suffer from linear artifacts which show as failures in linearity-related statistical tests such as the binary-rank and the linear-complexity test. In this paper, we give three new contributions. First, we introduce two new linear transformations that have been handcrafted to have good statistical properties and at the same time to be programmable very efficiently on superscalar processors, or even directly in hardware. Then, we describe a new test for Hamming-weight dependencies that is able to discover subtle, previously unknown biases in existing generators (in particular, in linear ones). Finally, we describe a number of scramblers, that is, nonlinear functions applied to the state array that reduce or delete the linear artifacts, and propose combinations of linear transformations and scramblers that give extremely fast pseudorandom generators of high quality. A novelty in our approach is that we use ideas from the theory of filtered linear-feedback shift register to prove some properties of our scramblers, rather than relying purely on heuristics. In the end, we provide simple, extremely fast generators that use a few hundred bits of memory, have provable properties and pass very strong statistical tests. CCS Concepts: • Mathematics of computing → Random number generation; Additional Key Words and Phrases: Pseudorandom number generators 1 INTRODUCTION In the last twenty years, in particular since the introduction of the Mersennne Twister [34], linear1 pseudorandom generators have been very popular: indeed, they are often the stock generator provided by several programming languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Manin Matrices, Quantum Elliptic Commutative Families and Characteristic Polynomial of Elliptic Gaudin Model Vladimir Roubtsov, Alexey Silantyev, Dmitri Talalaev
    Manin Matrices, Quantum Elliptic Commutative Families and Characteristic Polynomial of Elliptic Gaudin Model Vladimir Roubtsov, Alexey Silantyev, Dmitri Talalaev To cite this version: Vladimir Roubtsov, Alexey Silantyev, Dmitri Talalaev. Manin Matrices, Quantum Elliptic Commu- tative Families and Characteristic Polynomial of Elliptic Gaudin Model. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry : Methods and Applications, National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 2009, 5 (110), Non spécifié. 10.3842/SIGMA.2009.110. hal-03054058 HAL Id: hal-03054058 https://hal.univ-angers.fr/hal-03054058 Submitted on 11 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 5 (2009), 110, 22 pages Manin Matrices, Quantum Elliptic Commutative Families and Characteristic Polynomial of Elliptic Gaudin Model? Vladimir RUBTSOV †§, Alexey SILANTYEV ‡ and Dmitri TALALAEV § † LAREMA, Universit´ed’Angers, 2 Boulevard Lavoisier, 49045 Angers, France E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.math.univ-angers.fr/∼volodya/ ‡ Department of Mathematics, University Gardens, University of Glasgow, G12 8QW, UK E-mail: [email protected] § ITEP, B. Cheremushkinskaja 25, 117218 Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Received March 30, 2009, in final form December 12, 2009; Published online December 24, 2009 doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2009.110 Abstract.
    [Show full text]