DOCSLIB.ORG

Report Reference: 4.1 Regulatory and Other Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report Reference: 4.1 Regulatory and Other Committee Report Reference: 4.1 Regulatory and Other Committee Open Report on behalf of Paul Coathup, Assistant Director, Highways & Transportation Report to: Planning & Regulation Committee Date: 16 July 2012 Proposed Speed Limit Reductions - B1188 between Subject: Branston and Ruskington KeyDecision decision? Reference: No Summary: The purpose of the Report is for Councillors to consider the responses to the statutory consultations and give their approval for the Proposed Speed Limit Reductions on the B1188 between Branston and Ruskington (as part of Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership's Red Route initiative), to be publicly advertised as part of the required Traffic Regulation Order process. Recommendation(s): It is recommended, following the mostly positive response to the consultations, that those objections received be overruled. The exception being, that in the case of the objection received from Branston and Mere Parish Council, this is upheld and their suggestion that the 60mph limit on the B1188 between Branston and Canwick be reduced to 50mph is included when the proposals are publicly advertised. Background 1. The B1188 is one of the twelve Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership’s ‘Road Safety Red Routes’ (RSRR), identified as having a high Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI) casualty rate in the County. Whilst the other RSRRs have seen reductions of almost 50% in KSI casualties and 23% in Slight Injuries, following implementation of various engineering measures and education / publicity initiatives, the B1188 has not. The KSI levels have stayed the same and Slight Injury numbers have increased. 2. Some minor improvements have been carried out at specific sites along the route with varying success. There is little scope for further casualty reduction measures except lowering the speed limit, which the Road Safety Partnership is now proposing for this route. 3. This type of measure was introduced very successfully in 2008, on the A52 between Boston and Skegness which is similar, in its poor alignment and sporadic development, to the B1188. This has seen a reduction in casualties Page 1 (over a three year ‘before and after’ study) of 48% in KSI collisions and 21% in Slight Injury collisions. Fatal Collisions dropped from six in three years to just one since. 4. On the sections of the B1188 that would change from the National Speed Limit to 50mph, there were four Fatal and nine Serious Injury Collisions in the period 1 January 1999 to 31 December 2011. If the success of the A52 scheme could be achieved, then it is estimated that these measures could save one Fatal and three Serious collisions per year. 5. It is also proposed, as part of this scheme, to reduce the current 50mph limit at Metheringham to 40mph following a separate speed limit review recently undertaken on all A and B roads within the County. 6. The plan at Appendix A shows the proposed Speed Limit Alterations and Appendix B lists the proposed changes. Consultations 7. As required as part of the process for introducing new Speed Limits, the statutory consultations with local Councillors, the statutory bodies, local bus operators and Parish Councils have been carried out in advance of publicly advertising the proposals. 8. These consultations were carried out between 14 May and 22June 2012. No responses have been received from North Kesteven District Council, Freight Transport Association, Road Haulage Association, Brylaine Travel Limited, PC Coaches of Lincoln Limited, Stagecoach in Lincolnshire and TransLinc. 9. County Councillors Mrs M Overton and Mrs P Bradwell are supportive of the proposals. A response has not been received from County Councillor E Bauer. 10. Lincolnshire Police and Lincolnshire Road Safety Partnership have no objections to the proposals. 11. North Kesteven District Councillor Ian Carrington has responded objecting to the proposals in that he does not feel the data and information provided is enough to justify that the 60mph (National Speed Limit for single carriageway roads) be reduced to 50mph, but would like to see the limits reduced in Digby, Scopwick and Blankney. He also has concerns that the proposed reductions in limits would not be properly enforced. In addition he requests that the consultations be sent to a wider number of Parishes. 12. The consultation letters were sent to twelve Parishes along the route of the proposals. 13. No responses have been received from the following Parishes: Ashby de la Launde; Dunston; Rowston and Dorrington. Page 2 14. The following Parishes have responded:- - Blankney – support the proposals. - Branston – the Parish object to the proposals as they feel that the stretch of the B1188 that carries the heaviest volume of traffic, between Canwick and Branston, has been left out of the proposals. If the proposals were to go ahead, this would be the only section (just one mile long) on the whole length of the road from Lincoln to Ruskington that would not have a speed limit of 50mph or less. (Plan at Appendix C shows the section of road being referred to). The Parish have confirmed that they would support an amended scheme. - Digby – the Parish Council meets on the 28 June 2012 and their views will be reported verbally to the meeting. - Metheringham – are in full agreement with the proposals. - Nocton – are supportive of the proposals but comment that there will still be impatient drivers attempting to overtake slower moving traffic. However, the benefits of the lower speed limit outweigh the risk of impatient drivers. - Potterhanworth - the Parish Council meets on the 25 June 2012 and their views will be reported verbally to the meeting. - Scopwick – unanimously support the proposals, but have asked the question why the limit has not been reduced from 50mph to 40mph through the villages of Digby and Dorrington. As in both cases they have houses / business adjacent to the road and junctions within the village with the main road. - Ruskington – are against the proposals and do not wish to see any changes to the existing limits. 15. This is the first part of the statutory consultation process for introducing new speed limits. Following the outcome of this meeting, if agreement to proceed is given, the proposals will be publicly advertised and at this stage formal objections can be submitted by members of the public and consultees (including those previously consulted). Conclusion 16. As can be seen from the above responses, there is general support for the proposed reductions in speed limits, and the broad collision / casualty data provided, confirms the need for action to be taken. 17. Concerns have been raised over levels of enforcement of the proposed new limits. Lincolnshire Police have not made any comments about enforcement Page 3 issues during the consultations and they are partners in the 'Road Safety Red Routes' Initiatives. 18. In relation to the objection from Branston and Mere Parish Council seeking a reduction to a 50mph speed limit between Canwick and Branston, this part of the B1188 is the start of the Red Route on leaving Lincoln and has in the past been targeted with various speed reduction measures, including mobile cameras, vehicle activated signs and other works which indicates that there is a problem with speed. Although this section was initially left out due to a lower level of recorded accidents, it is considered that it would be appropriate to include the reduction of the speed limit along this part from 60mph to 50mph. 19. Scopwick Parish Council, whilst giving their support for the proposed measures, asked why the 50mph limits in Digby and Dorrington were not being reduced to 40mph like Metheringham. These proposals were drawn up primarily as part of the Road Safety Red Routes scheme to reduce accidents, it has however, coincided with the County Council's Speed Limit Review, which is currently ongoing. In carrying out this Review it was found that a reduction in the speed limit at Metheringham from the current 50mph to 40mph was justified. This was not the case with the section of 50mph limits that run through Digby and Dorrington. 20. As part of the planned works for the scheme, the existing 50mph signs at the villages of Digby and Dorrington will be enhanced and speed limit roundels on red backgrounds will be marked on the roads to help emphasise the limits that are in operation. 21. Concerns were raised that more Parish Councils should have been consulted. In the first part of the process only the Parish Councils directly affected are consulted. Neighbouring Councils will have an opportunity to make their views known when the proposals are publicly advertised. Consultation a) Policy Proofing Actions Required n/a Appendices These are listed below and attached at the back of the report Appendix A Plan showing Proposed Speed Limit alterations. Appendix B List of Proposed Alterations to Speed Limits. Appendix C Plan showing the the Existing 60mph Limit between Canwick and Branston Page 4 Background Papers The following background papers as defined in the Local Government Act 1972 were relied upon in the writing of this report. Document title Where the document can be viewed No background papers within Section 100D of the Local Government Act 1972 were used in the preparation of this Report. This report was written by Martin Hollingsworth, Senior Highways Officer, who can be contacted on 01522 782070 or [email protected]. Page 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Side Roads) Order 2014
    THE LINCOLNSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL (A15 LINCOLN EASTERN BYPASS) (CLASSIFIED ROAD) (SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2014 The Lincolnshire County Council (“the Council”) makes this Order in exercise of its powers under Sections 14 and 125 of the Highways Act 1980 and all other powers enabling it in that behalf:- 1. (1) The Council is authorised in relation to the classified roads in the Parish of Greetwell in the District of West Lindsey, the Parish of Canwick, the Parish of Branston and Mere, the Parish of Canwick and the Parish of Bracebridge Heath all in the District of North Kesteven and in the Abbey Ward in the District of Lincoln all in the County of Lincolnshire to:- (i) improve the highways named in the Schedules and shown on the corresponding Site Plan by cross-hatching; (ii) stop up each length of highway described in the Schedules and shown on the corresponding Site Plan by zebra hatching; (iii) construct a new highway along each route whose centre line is shown on a Site Plan by an unbroken black line surrounded by stipple; (iv) stop up each private means of access to premises described in the Schedules and shown on the corresponding Site Plan by a solid black band; (v) provide new means of access to premises along each route shown on a Site Plan by thin diagonal hatching. (2) Where a new highway is to be constructed wholly or partly along the same route as a new access or part of one, that new highway shall be created subject to the private rights over that new access.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Branston Booths Reference Number: CA/7/1/82/4
    Parish: Branston and Mere, Potterhanworth Title: Land at Branston Booths Reference number: CA/7/1/82/4 DEPOSIT OF MAP AND STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 31(6) OF THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Details about the Deposit Landowner’s name: Landowner’s address: Date of deposit of the map and statement: Date on which the map and statement expires: Geographic Location Grid Reference: TF 067 678, TF 076 687 Address(es) and Field House Farm Bardney Road Branston Booths LN4 1JG postcode of any buildings on the land: Postcodes covering LN4 1, LN4 2 the area land: Principal city or town Lincoln nearest to land: Parish: Branston and Mere, Potterhanworth Electoral Division: Branston and Navenby District: North Kesteven DEPOSIT OF A STATUTORY DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 31(6) OF THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Landowner’s name: Mr P Wilkinson Landowner’s address: 392 Burton Road, Lincoln Date on which the 21 April 2000 Statutory Declaration expires: DEPOSIT OF A STATUTORY DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 31(6) OF THE HIGHWAYS ACT 1980 Landowner’s name: Mr P Wilkinson Landowner’s address: 392 Burton Road, Lincoln Date on which the 11 April 2010 Statutory Declaration expires: COUNTY COUNCIL’S CONTACT DETAILS Section: Public Rights of Way and Countryside Access Section Department: Development Directorate Address: Lincolnshire County Council, 4th Floor, City Hall, LINCOLN LN1 1DN Telephone: 01522 782070 E-mail: [email protected] ELECTRONIC REGISTER Government legislation requires that details of maps and statements and Statutory Declarations deposited with Lincolnshire County Council under Section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 be made available for viewing by the public on the authority’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Branston and Mere Neighbourhood Plan
    Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 1 Branston & Mere Parish Council Page 1 Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 2 1 The Neighbourhood Plan This Neighbourhood Plan has been produced by Branston & Mere Parish Council and Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of the community. The Neighbourhood Plan will guide future land use planning in the settlement between 2020 and 2037. From previous public consultation events held in 2016 and 2017, the community have suggested that they wanted Branston & Mere to develop sensitively and sustainably with the necessary infrastructure keeping pace with the growth over the next 17 years. The Draft Neighbourhood Plan was subjected to regulation 14 consultation that commenced on the 2nd December 2019 and finished on the 27th January 2020. The comments received during the consultation period have influenced this Submission version of the Neighbourhood Plan. The Plan has now been submitted to North Kesteven District Council where it will be subjected to further six weeks consultation and then independently examined. If successful, the community will vote in a public referendum (yet to be organised) on whether you would like North Kesteven District Council to use the Neighbourhood Plan when determining future planning applications within Branston & Mere. Branston & Mere Parish Council Page 2 Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 3 2 Foreword The Localism Act 2011 granted powers to Parish Council’s to prepare land use planning documents and the Act provides an opportunity for local communities to have direct input into the development of their local area by preparing a Neighbourhood Plan. The Neighbourhood Plan for Branston & Mere has been prepared by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group comprising of Parish Councillors and members of the local community.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 396 LOCAL GOVER>:tfElT BOUKD.OT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin G Lady Bowden .Kr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CBS DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt Hon William Whitelaw, CH MC MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARKANGiiflENTS TOR THE COUNTY OF LINCOLNSHIRE 1. The last Order under Section 51 of the Local Government Act 1972 in relation to electoral arrangements for districts in the county of Lincolnshire was made on 6 November 1979. As required by Section 63 and Schedule 9 of the Act we have now reviewed the electoral arrangements for that county, using the procedures we had set out in our Report No 6* 2. We informed the Lincolnshire County Council in a consultation letter dated 20 November 1979 that we proposed to conduct the review, and sent copies of the letter to all local authorities and parish meetings in the county, to the MFs representing the constituencies concerned, to the headquarters of the main political parties and to the editors both of local newspapers circulating in the county and of the local government press* Notices in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* On 16 January 1980 the County Council submitted to us a draft scheme in which they suggested 75 electoral divisions for the county, each returning one member in accordance with Section 6(2)(a) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Infrastructure Study for Central Lincolnshire Volume 1- Strategy
    CHRIS BLANDFORD ASSOCIATES environment landscape planning Central Lincolnshire Joint Planning Unit Green Infrastructure Study for Central Lincolnshire Volume 1- Strategy December 2011 CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1.0 SETTING THE SCENE 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Need for the Study 2 1.3 Study Area and Context 3 1.4 Green Infrastructure Concept 3 1.5 Overview of Approach 8 1.6 Study Outputs 8 2.0 CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE’S GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE 10 2.1 General 10 2.2 Overview of Green Infrastructure Assets 10 2.3 Green Infrastructure Needs and Opportunities 13 3.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE VISION AND OBJECTIVES 16 3.1 General 16 3.2 Vision and Objectives 16 3.3 The Proposed Green Infrastructure Network 17 4.0 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY FRAMEWORK 29 4.1 General 29 4.2 Green Infrastructure Delivery Principles 29 4.3 Strategic Green Infrastructure Initiatives and Projects 30 4.4 Governance and Delivery Co-ordination Arrangements 44 4.5 Potential Funding Sources 46 4.6 Spatial Planning and Development Management 50 4.7 Management and Governance Options 57 4.8 Further Work 59 4.9 Outline Action Plan 60 4.10 Monitoring Arrangements 70 APPENDICES A1. Study Methodology A2. Private Gardens, Street Trees and Green Roof Research A3. Policy Context Summary A4 Additional Green Infrastructure Funding Sources A5. LDF Green Infrastructure Policy Advice A6. Review of Green Infrastructure Management and Governance Options A7. Green Infrastructure Management and Governance Case Studies December 2011 Green Infrastructure Study for Central Lincolnshire -
    [Show full text]
  • Branston and Mere Today
    Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 1 BRANSTON AND MERE NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN July 2019 Branston & Mere Parish Council Page 1 Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 2 1 The Neighbourhood Plan This Neighbourhood Plan has been produced by Branston & Mere Parish Council and Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of the community. The Neighbourhood Plan will guide future land use planning in the settlement between 2019 and 2036. From previous public consultation events held in 2016 and 2017, the community have suggested that they wanted Branston & Mere to develop sensitively and sustainably with the necessary infrastructure keeping pace with the growth over the next 17 years. This consultation is your last opportunity to let us know if we have included the right things in the Neighbourhood Plan before we submit the Plan to North Kesteven District Council where it will be independently examined. If successful, the community will vote in a public referendum (yet to be organised) on whether you would like North kesteven District Council to use the Neighbourhood Plan when determining future planning applications within Branston & Mere. Remember, a Neighbourhood Plan can only influence planning related activity, so not everything raised at the public consultation events can be included in the Plan. The consultation period runs from 2nd December 2019 to the 27th January 2020 Please let us know what you think by completing the comment form on our website: If you complete your comments on paper, then please send them to: Mrs Joy Naylor, 30 Moor Lane, Branston Booths, Lincoln, LN4 1JE Branston & Mere Parish Council Page 2 Branston & Mere Neighbourhood Plan 3 2 Foreword The Localism Act 2011 granted powers to Parish Council’s to prepare land use planning documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) July 2015
    Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) July 2015 Please note: This document supersedes the version published in October 2014 and includes sites submitted during the Local Plan consultation which took place in October/November 2014. We have not included sites submitted that are less than 0.5ha for employment sites or for under 25 dwellings. At this stage we are not committed to any sites identified in this document. The inclusion of a site in this document does not represent any decision by the Central Lincolnshire authorities and does not provide the site with any kind of planning status. They are sites promoted to us, not by us. Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2015 Contents 1. Introduction 2. National Policy 3. Methodology 4. Site Profiles 4.1 City of Lincoln 4.2 North Kesteven 4.3 West Lindsey Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2015 1. Introduction This is the Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHELAA) for Central Lincolnshire. It is a technical document that informs the Local Plan preparation, and will help to identify potential site allocations that may be required to meet future housing and employment need within Central Lincolnshire. Central Lincolnshire covers the City of Lincoln, North Kesteven and West Lindsey. These three councils have come together to prepare a joint Local Plan for the area and this includes a joint evidence base. In October and November 2014 we consulted on the Preliminary Draft Local Plan and an earlier version of the SHELAA was published alongside the draft Local Plan for comments.
    [Show full text]
  • 1991 Ward, Census Code Range (WARDC91)
    UK Data Archive Study Number 6330 - British Household Panel Survey, Waves 1-18, 1991-2009: Special Licence Access, 1991 Ward, Census Code Range (WARDC91) British Household Panel Survey, waves 1-18 (1991-2009) User Documentation: 1991 ward, Census code range (WARDC91) 03 November 2009 For more information contact: Birgitta Rabe [email protected] ++44-1206-874594 Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Wivenhoe Park Colchester Essex CO4 3SQ 1991 Ward, Census code range (WARDC91) Details of the code ranges: Data Range of codes Comments description 1991 ward The 1991 administrative and electoral areas to which the 1 (Census metre postcode grid reference has been assigned using code range) point-in-polygon techniques and digital administrative and electoral boundaries. A pseudo code is included for Channel Islands and Isle of Man. The field will be blank for postcodes with no grid reference. 01AAFA-55TTFZ; England & Wales = {2-digit county code 71UB01-82UB30; Scotland = {2-digit district code {2-digit ward code 95AΔ01-95ZΔ51; Northern Ireland = 2-digit county code 1-digit district code 2-digit ward code 99ZZ00; 99ZZ00 = Channel Is/IoM (pseudo); or ΔΔΔΔΔΔ ΔΔΔΔΔΔ = no information available. Source: National Statistics website: www.statistics.gov.uk National Statistics Postcode Directory: 2007 User Guide v1 Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of OPSI 00AAFA 01AAFA Aldersgate 00AAFB 01AAFB Aldgate 00AAFC 01AAFC Bassishaw 00AAFD 01AAFD Billingsgate 00AAFE 01AAFE Bishopsgate 00AAFF
    [Show full text]
  • March 2014 2013 VA Hymans Robertson LLP Has Carried out An
    2013 VA HymansLUATION Robertson – INITIAL LLP RESULTS has carried out an actuarial valuation of the Lincolnshire Pension Fund (“the Fund”) as at 31 March 2013, details of which are set out in the report dated 21 March 2014 (“the Report”), addressed to Lincolnshire County Council (“the Client”). The Report was prepared for the sole use and benefit of our Client and not for any other party; and Hymans Robertson LLP makes no representation or warranties to any third party as to the accuracy or completeness of the Report. The Report was not prepared for any third party and it will not address the particular interests or concerns of any such third party. The Report is intended to advise our Client on the past service funding position of the Fund at 31 March 2013 and employer contribution rates from April 2014, and should not be considered a substitute for specific advice in relation to other individual circumstances. As this Report has not been prepared for a third party, no reliance by any party will be placed on the Report. It follows that there is no duty or liability by Hymans Robertson LLP (or its members, partners, officers, employees and agents) to any party other than the named Client. Hymans Robertson LLP therefore disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance on or use of the Report by any person having access to the Report or by anyone who may be informed of the contents of the Report. Hymans Robertson LLP is the owner of all intellectual property rights in the Report and the Report is protected by copyright laws and treaties around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lincolnshire Site Allocations Settlement Analysis
    Central Lincolnshire Site Allocations Settlement Analysis June 2021 Contents 1. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................... 3 National policy context ......................................................................................................... 3 Relationship with other documents ...................................................................................... 4 2. Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 5 Stage 1: Information gathering ............................................................................................. 5 Stage 2: Testing the information .......................................................................................... 7 Consultation ........................................................................................................................ 7 Stage 3: Settlement analysis ............................................................................................... 7 3. Outputs – The Village Profiles ............................................................................................. 8 Map Key .............................................................................................................................. 8 Recent Growth..................................................................................................................... 8 Settlement ‘scoring’ ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Branston Brewery
    Branston Brewery The history of a small village brewery: How it may have operated and the possible reasons for its demise – (including a short history of the families involved). Paul Hickman Contents List of figures Page 2 Introduction Page 3 The Kirtons Page 6 The brewing processes Page 14 Alfred Healey Page 33 Frederick Ryley Page 39 Possible reasons for the demise Page 44 of Branston Brewery Epilogue Page 59 Appendices Page 64 Bibliography Page 78 All material contained herein is copyright to the author, and may not be reproduced without written permission from him. [email protected] 1 List of figures Front cover A small Victorian brewery c1880. Gourvish, T.R. & Wilson, R.G. (1994) The British Brewing Industry 1830-1980, Plate 77, between pp. 486-487. (Branston Brewery may have looked like this). Figure 1 Tegg`s engraving, illustrating the close connection between agriculture and beer production (c1800). Figure 2 Domestic brewing equipment (1808). Figure 3 An eighteenth century English country brewery. Figure 4 The Old Rectory, Branston. Figure 5 Contents page of The London and Country Brewer (1750). Figure 6 Floor maltings. Figure 7 Head of a brewer`s mashing oar. Figure 8 Steel`s patent mashing machine. Figure 9 A French brewery (1760). Figure 10 A London porter brewery (1820). Figure 11 An early open copper. Figure 12 The brewhouse at Painswick, Gloucestershire. Figure 13 Moreton`s patent refrigerator. Figure 14 Banovallum House, Horncastle (1866). Figure 15 Banovallum House, Horncastle today. Figure 16 The workforce of a typical small Victorian brewery. Figure 17 Hogarth`s engraving of Beer Street and Gin Lane (1751).
    [Show full text]