DOCSLIB.ORG

Lincolnshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lincolnshire Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 396 LOCAL GOVER>:tfElT BOUKD.OT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KGB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin G Lady Bowden .Kr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CBS DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt Hon William Whitelaw, CH MC MP Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOR THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARKANGiiflENTS TOR THE COUNTY OF LINCOLNSHIRE 1. The last Order under Section 51 of the Local Government Act 1972 in relation to electoral arrangements for districts in the county of Lincolnshire was made on 6 November 1979. As required by Section 63 and Schedule 9 of the Act we have now reviewed the electoral arrangements for that county, using the procedures we had set out in our Report No 6* 2. We informed the Lincolnshire County Council in a consultation letter dated 20 November 1979 that we proposed to conduct the review, and sent copies of the letter to all local authorities and parish meetings in the county, to the MFs representing the constituencies concerned, to the headquarters of the main political parties and to the editors both of local newspapers circulating in the county and of the local government press* Notices in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies* 3* On 16 January 1980 the County Council submitted to us a draft scheme in which they suggested 75 electoral divisions for the county, each returning one member in accordance with Section 6(2)(a) of the Act. 4. We considered this scheme together with the views expressed by local interests* On 24 April 1980 we issued draft proposals which we sent to all those who had received our consultation letter, or commented on the County Council's draft scheme* Notices were inserted in the local press announcing that the draft proposals had been issued and could be inspected at the County Council's offices* 5» We based our draft proposals on the County Council's draft scheme, though we made certain modifications designed to improve the balance between divisions or districts. Several of these modifications were derived from local comments made about the draft scheme* 6. The modifications we made were as follows: (a) Boston Borough . V'e replaced the 7 electoral divisions proposed by the County Council in their draft scheme by the 7 division arrangement which the County Council had considered at one stage (with division names as assigned by ourselves), but modified so as to transfer the Hilldyke parish ward of Flshtoft district ward from Wyberton electoral division to Coastal electoral division. (b) East Llndsev District We made adjustments to 5 of the electoral divisions proposed by the County Council to produce a pattern of electoral divisions fully compatible with the new district wards. (c) North Kesteven District We made a modification to the boundary between the County Council's proposed Bassingham Rural and Cliff divisions. We appreciated however^that this modification did not meet the objections of some parish councils and therefore invited the County Council to consider whether there was any means of doing this by an adjustment to our draft proposals. (d) South Kesteven District We thought that an additional division was warranted in tnis district and replaced the 13 divisions proposed by the County Council by H divisions formed by the re-arrangement of the wards in the district. We renamed the County Council's proposed Stamford Bast division Stamford Borth. (e) West Lindaev District We omitted the prefix 'Rural1 from the County Council's proposed division names of ^Market Rasen', 'Stow1 and 'Welton' and "District1 from their proposed 'Caistor1 division. (f) Division names generally To simplify the names we omitted district prefixes to division names wherever possible throughout the draft proposals. 7. We received comments in response to our draft proposals from the County Council, five district councils,.sixteen parish .councils, one local political organisation and two individuals. A list of those who wrote to us is given at Appendix 1 to this Report. 8. Lincolnshire County Council supported our draft proposals for four districts, subject to certain suggestions about names* They put forward suggestions for alternative arrangements, as well as some different division names, in respect of the other three* 9* The comments we received can be summarised as follows:* (a) Boston Borough Lincolnshire County Council preferred their own draft scheme to our draft proposals and also put forward alternative names for 5 divisions. Boston Borough Council have expressed a preference for the County Council's draft scheme arrangements, flshtoft Parish Council objected to the inclusion of the Hilldyke parish ward in the Coastal electoral division* Kirton Parish Council thought that Holland Fen district ward should not be included in the Fenside electoral division* AlgarkLrk Parish Council, Fosdyke Parish Council, Sutterton Parish Council and Wigtoft Parish Council suggested an alternative name for the Kirton electoral division. An individual suggested alternative names for all the divisions in the borough. (b) East Idndaey District East Lindsey District Council wrote in support of our draft proposals. Lincolnshire County Council put forward alternative names for the electoral divisions of Chapel St Leonards and Tattershall* Coniugsby Pariah Council also suggested an alternative name for the Tattershall electoral division. Tetney Parish Council expressed concern at the geographical size of the Louth Rural North electoral division. An individual suggested the transfer of Edlington parish from the Woodhall Spa and Wragby electoral division to the Horncastle and Tetford division. (c) Lincoln City Lincolnshire County Council requested that the 'Lincoln1 prefix be added to the division names of Abbey, Castle, Moorland and Park. (d) Morth Kesteven District In the light of local representational which they received, Lincolnshire County Council put forward an alternative arrangement for the electoral divisions of Branston and Metheringham, Cliff,and North East Kesteven* Branston and Mere Parish Council, Canwick Local Council, Heighington Parish Council and Washingborough Parish Council all expressed support for the County Council's alternative arrangements for these three electoral divisions* North Kesteven District Council expressed support for their own alternative schxae for the district. Waddington .. Parish gave their full support to the Cliff electoral division included in our draft proposals. (e) South Holland District Lincolnshire County Council put forward alternative names for the four Spalding electoral divisions. Cowbit Parish Council disagreed with the combination of district wards which made up Spalding East electoral division* (f) South Keateven District South Kesteven District Council accepted the draft proposals* Lincolnshire County Council supported our proposals subject to the inclusion of the parishes of Ufflngton and Tallington in our proposed Stamford North division on the grounds that the transfer would serve to balance numerically the 2 divisions of Stamford and reduce the size of the proposed Grimsthorpe division; they also put forward alternative names for the Bourne East and Bourne West electoral divisions* Market Deeping Parish Council objected to the combination of Market and West Deepingfand Deeping St James district wards to form a single electoral division. Rutland and Stamford Constituency Labour Party reiterated earlier views disagreeing with the electoral divisions in the South Grantham area, (g) West Lindsey District Lincolnshire County Council put forward alternative names for the electoral divisions of Caistor, Market Rasen, Stow and Welton* West Lindaey District Council reiterated their objection to the splitting of Witham district ward. They wished to see Sudbrooke parish transferred from the Welton electoral division to the Bardney and Cherry Willingham division. Stow Parish Council and Burial Authority supported the use of the name of Stow for the electoral division in which the parish was comprised. 10. When we came to reassess our draft proposals we took account of all the comments we had received and came to the following conclusions:- (a) Boston Borough We gave careful consideration to the views expressed by the County Council and Boston Borough Council that we should revert to the arrangements in the County Council's draft scheme on grounds of local wishes. We re-examined the draft scheme arrangements and found the balance between the divisions of the Borough particularly uneven, with three of the seven having electorate totals,which deviated more than 20% from the county average. Our draft proposals offered a much more even standard of representation and despite the local support for the County Council's draft scheme, we decided in view.of the provisions of Schedule 11 of the. Local Government Act 1972, ..that on balance 'it would be right for. us to ' confirm" them. We considered Fishtoft Parish Council's'suggested adjustment to our Wyberton and Coastal divisions, but we saw no sufficient justification for accepting this, particularly in view of the more unequal standard of represent- ation between the two divisions which it would have produced. We also decided not to adopt Kirton Parish Council's suggested adjustment to our Fenside division because it involved the transfer of a district ward and no indication was given where this ward should be transferred to. We decided
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zurbarán's Jacob and His Twelve Sons: Paintings from Auckland Castle
    STUNNING SET OF SPANISH BAROQUE WORKS TRAVELS TO THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FIRST TIME Zurbarán’s Jacob and His Twelve Sons: Paintings from Auckland Castle SERIES HISTORICALLY CONNECTED TO MOVEMENT FOR RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE January 31 through April 22, 2018 Francisco de Zurbarán helped to define Seville’s Golden Age, a period of economic expansion and cultural resurgence in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, when the Andalusian seaport monopolized trade with the New World. Throughout the late 1620s and 1630s, the artist and his workshop produced monumental multi- Zurbarán and other works on display in the Long Dining Room at Auckland Castle; photo credit: photo Colin Davison, courtesy of The Auckland Project figure paintings as well as series of single-figure works representing the saints, the Apostles, and various other subjects for ecclesiastical institutions and palaces throughout Spain and the Spanish colonies. With a decline in Seville’s economy in the 1640s and the plague of 1649, he turned increasingly to the Latin American market, supplying paintings on commission to churches, monasteries, and wealthy individuals, while also selling workshop pieces on the open market in Buenos Aires and Lima, Peru. Between 1640 and 1645, Zurbarán and his assistants produced the remarkable series Jacob and His Twelve Sons, which is on view at Francisco de Zurbarán (1598–1664), Joseph, ca. 1640–45, oil on canvas, The Frick Collection through the spring of 2018. Co-organized by the Frick with the Auckland Castle, County Durham, © The Auckland Project/Zurbarán Trust, photo by Robert LaPrelle 1 Meadows Museum in Dallas and Auckland Castle, County Durham, England, the exhibition was first seen in Dallas last fall.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.2 North Kesteven Sites Identified Within North Kesteven Local Authority Area
    Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2014 4.2 North Kesteven Sites identified within North Kesteven local authority area. Page 1 Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2014 Page 2 Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2014 North Kesteven DC SHLAA Map CL1418 Reference Site Address Land off North Street, Digby Site Area (ha) 0.31 Ward Ashby de la Launde and Cranwell Parish Digby Estimated Site 81 Capacity Site Description Greenfield site in agricultural use, within a settlement. Listed Building in close proximity. The inclusion of this site or any other sites in this document does not represent a decision by the Central Lincolnshire authorities and does not provide the site with any kind of planning status. Page 3 Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2014 Map CL1418 http://aurora.central- lincs.org.uk/map/Aurora.svc/run?script=%5cShared+Services%5cJPU%5cJPUJS.AuroraScri pt%24&nocache=1206308816&resize=always Page 4 Central Lincolnshire Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment SHELAA 2014 North Kesteven SHLAA Map CL432 Reference Site Address Playing field at Cranwell Road, Cranwell Site Area (ha) 0.92 Ward Ashby de la Launde and Cranwell Parish Cranwell & Byard's Leap Estimated Site 40 Capacity Site Description Site is Greenfield site. In use as open space. Planning permission refused (05/0821/FUL) for 32 dwellings. The inclusion of this site or any other sites in this document does not represent a decision by the Central Lincolnshire authorities and does not provide the site with any kind of planning status.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire.. Far 683
    TRADES DIRECTORY.] LINCOLNSHIRE.. FAR 683 Darnell William, Bardney, Lincoln Dawson William, Nettleton, Caistor Dickinson Thomas, Friskney, Boston Darnill George, Orby, Boston Dawson Wm. Skeldyke, Kirton, Boston DickinsonW.Sandpits,Westhorpe,Spaldg Darnill Jn. Jack, Grainthorpe, Grimsby Dawson William, Union road, Caistor Dickinson Wm. Westhorpe, Spalding Daubeny Jabez, North Kyme, Lincoln Day Edward Jas. Messingham, Brigg Dickson Frederick, Tumby, Boston Dauber John William, Ruckland, Louth Day John, Wood Enderby, Boston Diggle E. Suttun St. Edmunds, Wisbech Daubney C. Hagworthingham, Spilsby Day John Wm. Scatter, Kirton Lindsey Diggle J.H. Loosegate rd. Moultn.Spldng Dau bney Charles, Leake, Boston Day Ro bt. Scotter Hig hfield, Ki rtonLindsy DiggleJ ohnHarber, j u n. Moulton, Spaldng Daubney Charles, jun. Leake, Boston Day Robert,Scotterthorpe,KirtonLindsy Diggle Thos. Ewerby Thorpe, Sleaford Daubney George, Belchford, Horncastle Day Thomas, Church street, Caistor Diggle Thomas, Weston, Spalding Daubney H.Manor frm.Canwick, Lincoln Day William, Scatter, Kirton Lindsey Dilworth James, Horse Shoe rd.Spaldmg Daubney Henry, Wyberton, Boston Day Wm. Cotehouses, 0 wston Ferry Dimbleby W .BishopNortn. Kirtn.Lindsy Daubney James, Navenby S.O Dean Arthur W. Dowsby, Falkingham Dinnis Thomas, Anderby, Alford Daulton Austin, West Keal, Spilsby Dean Edward, Algarkirk, Boston Dinnison Thomas Hy. Burr la. Spalding Daulton Henry, Bilsby, Alford Dean John, Drayton, Swineshead,Boston Dinsdale John, Nth.Killingholme, Ulceby Daulton Jesse, The Grange, East Keal Dean John, Drove end, Wisbech Dion Frederick, Sibsey, Boston Coates, East Keal, Spilsby Dean John, Goxhill, Hull Dion James, Sibsey, Boston Daulton Joseph, Keal Coates, Spilsby Dean John Chas. Drove end, Wisbech Dion Jesse, Sibsey, Boston Daulton Thomas, East Kirkby, Spilsby Dean John Hy.
    [Show full text]
  • New Electoral Arrangements for North Kesteven District Council Final Recommendations January 2021
    New electoral arrangements for North Kesteven District Council Final Recommendations January 2021 Translations and other formats: To get this report in another language or in a large-print or Braille version, please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England at: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] Licensing: The mapping in this report is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2021 A note on our mapping: The maps shown in this report are for illustrative purposes only. Whilst best efforts have been made by our staff to ensure that the maps included in this report are representative of the boundaries described by the text, there may be slight variations between these maps and the large PDF map that accompanies this report, or the digital mapping supplied on our consultation portal. This is due to the way in which the final mapped products are produced. The reader should therefore refer to either the large PDF supplied with this report or the digital mapping for the true likeness of the boundaries intended. The boundaries as shown on either the large PDF map or the digital mapping should always appear identical. Contents Introduction 1 Who we are and what we do 1 What is an electoral review? 1 Why North Kesteven? 2 Our proposals for North Kesteven 2 How will the recommendations affect you? 2 Review
    [Show full text]
  • By NT Wright
    All Saints St. Mary’s NETTLEHAM PARISH CHURCH RISEHOLME PARISH CHURCH The Good News from Nettleham Sunday 9 February 2020 3 Before Lent No 135 Father Richard writes…. Revolution! Some books, today. Several of us are big fans of the theologian NT Wright (when he writes his hard books) or Tom Wright (when he writes his more readable stuff). Former Bishop of Durham, and now one of the world’s leading New Testament scholars he has inspiring ideas about many aspects of our faith, especially how we derive it from our reading of scripture. He has a recurrent theme of the crucifixion, the death of the eternal Word on the cross, being the seal and starting gun for a new creation – a transformed world not somewhere else and in the future, but here and now. “On earth as it is in heaven”. So the title of one of his most recent books is my flag to wave today, as we turn our backs on Christmas and start looking forward to Holy Week and Easter – The Day the Revolution Began. What does the Christ’s death on the cross and his resurrection mean for us? The beginning of a revolution. Not a bit of sympathetic churchgoing tacked onto our lives, but a revolution. There can be no transformation of us and our lives, no transformation of God’s created world and of all people, no triumph of justice and mercy over greed, oppression and selfishness, unless there is a revolution. The rule of God, not of human power – cosmic regime change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Towers December 2018 & January 2019
    The Three Towers December 2018 & January 2019 Serving the communities in and around Edenham, Swinstead, Witham on the Hill, Toft, Lound and Manthorpe Advertising manager: [email protected] Editor: [email protected] Incumbent in the United Benefice of Edenham with Witham on the Hill and Swinstead, Warden of Edenham Regional House and Ministry Experience Scheme Leader The Bishop of Lincoln is pleased to announce the appointment of the Reverend Edward Martin as Incumbent in the United Benefice of Edenham with Witham on the Hill and Swinstead, as Warden of Edenham Regional House and Ministry Experience Scheme Leader. Father Edward has most recently been working as Priest in Charge of Grimsby Saint Augustine and Great Grimsby Saint Andrew and Saint Luke. The licensing service will take place on Thursday 14 February 2019, 7pm at St Andrew’s, Witham on the Hill, with the Bishop of Grantham, the Bishop of Richborough and the Archdeacon of Boston officiating. 24th October 2018 The Old Palace, Lincoln. LN2 1PU 01522-504050 [email protected] Website edition: http://parishes.lincolnshire.gov.uk/ToftcumLoundandManthorpe/ Father Edward Martin Fr Edward Martin (Ed) was born in Nottinghamshire and grew up in a small village near Newark. After attending school in Tuxford where he met his wife Lesley, Ed studied for a BA in Politics at Hull University before working for several years at the Benefits office in Lincoln. Ed and his family made the move to Mirfield in 2000 where he studied for the priesthood at the College of the Resurrection. Ordained in 2003, Ed served his curacy in Carrington on the outskirts of Nottingham before being appointed as Priest in Charge of Chapel St Leonards and Hogsthorpe.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool
    Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool Upper Tier Tool Report September 2015 Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool Upper Tier Tool Report Document Control Sheet Project Title Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool Report Title Upper Tier Tool Report Revision 3.0 Status Final Control Date 13/10/2015 Record of Issue Issue Status Author Date Check Date Authorised Date 1.0 Draft JC 02/09/15 PR 02/09/15 GB 02/09/15 2.0 Final PR 21/09/15 PR 21/09/15 GB 21/09/15 3.0 Final PR 15/10/15 PR 15/10/15 PR 15/10/15 Distribution Organisation Contact Copies Lincolnshire County Council Andy Gutherson Electronic Lincolnshire County Council Lee Rowley Electronic This Report is presented to Lincolnshire County Council in respect of Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool and may not be used or relied on by any other person or by the client in relation to any other matters not covered specifically by the scope of this Report. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Report, Mouchel Limited working as Lincolnshire County Council Highways Alliance is obliged to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence in the performance of the services required by Lincolnshire Local Plan Tool and Mouchel Limited shall not be liable except to the extent that it has failed to exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence, and this report shall be read and construed accordingly. This Lincolnshire County Council Highways Alliance Report has been prepared by Mouchel Limited. No individual is personally liable in connection with the preparation of this Report. By receiving this Report and acting on it, the client or any other person accepts that no individual is personally liable whether in contract, tort, for breach of statutory duty or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Welles Family in England
    HISTORY OFHE T WELLES F AMILY IN E NGLAND; WITH T HEIR DERIVATION IN THIS COUNTRY FROM GOVERNOR THOMAS WELLES, OF CONNECTICUT. By A LBERT WELLES, PRESIDENT O P THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OP HERALDRY AND GENBALOGICAL REGISTRY OP NEW YORK. (ASSISTED B Y H. H. CLEMENTS, ESQ.) BJHttl)n a account of tljt Wu\\t% JFamtlg fn fHassssacIjusrtta, By H ENRY WINTHROP SARGENT, OP B OSTON. BOSTON: P RESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. 1874. II )2 < 7-'/ < INTRODUCTION. ^/^Sn i Chronology, so in Genealogy there are certain landmarks. Thus,n i France, to trace back to Charlemagne is the desideratum ; in England, to the Norman Con quest; and in the New England States, to the Puri tans, or first settlement of the country. The origin of but few nations or individuals can be precisely traced or ascertained. " The lapse of ages is inces santly thickening the veil which is spread over remote objects and events. The light becomes fainter as we proceed, the objects more obscure and uncertain, until Time at length spreads her sable mantle over them, and we behold them no more." Its i stated, among the librarians and officers of historical institutions in the Eastern States, that not two per cent of the inquirers succeed in establishing the connection between their ancestors here and the family abroad. Most of the emigrants 2 I NTROD UCTION. fled f rom religious persecution, and, instead of pro mulgating their derivation or history, rather sup pressed all knowledge of it, so that their descendants had no direct traditions. On this account it be comes almost necessary to give the descendants separately of each of the original emigrants to this country, with a general account of the family abroad, as far as it can be learned from history, without trusting too much to tradition, which however is often the only source of information on these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Heritage
    Group Travel Aviation Heritage Lincolnshire is renowned as the ‘Home of the Royal Air Force’ and has a vast aviation heritage. The county’s flat, open countryside and its location made it ideal for the development of airfields during World War I, and in World War II Lincolnshire became the most important home to Bomber Command. Several airfields are still operational and serving the modern day RAF while former airfields, museums and memorials are witness to the bravery of the men and women who served here in most turbulent times. How to get here The district is well connected from the A1, A15, A17 and A46 roads. Accessibility Please contact individual venues for accessibility requirements. CRANWELL AVIATION HERITAGE MUSEUM ALLOW UP TO: 1.5 hours The Royal Air Force College at Cranwell is a famous landmark in RAF history. A fascinating exhibition recalls in words and photographs the early years of the airfield from its origins as a Royal Naval Air Service Station and the establishment of the College as the first Military Air Academy in the world to its present day operation. Group ticket price Please contact the museum for more information. Parking Free parking is available on site. Guided tours Tours are included within the package; tour group maximum number: 50. Tours can be tailored to specific needs. Please enquire upon booking. Opening Times 1 April to 31 October: 7 days per week, 10am to 4.30pm. 1 November to 31 March: Saturdays and Sundays only, 10am to 4pm. khuyh Contact Details For more information please contact: Cranwell Aviation Heritage Museum Heath Farm, North Rauceby, Sleaford, NG34 8QR Tel: 01529 488490 www.cranwellaviation.co.uk www.heartoflincs.com Page 1 of 6 RAF COLLEGE CRANWELL HERITAGE & ETHOS CENTRE ALLOW UP TO: 1.5 hours RAF College Cranwell Heritage & Ethos Centre contains artefacts and exhibitions covering the Flying Training at RAF Cranwell and the Central Flying School over the last 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Accounts 2013-14
    Lincolnshire County Council Statement of Accounts 2013-14 Note Contents: Page Explanatory Foreword 3 Introduction to the Accounts 4 Review of 2013-14 5 Statement of Responsibilities for the Statement of Accounts 11 Financial Statements Movement in Reserves Statement 12 Comprehensive Income and Expenditure Statement 14 Balance Sheet 15 Cash Flow Statement 16 Notes to the Financial Statements Note 1 Statement of Accounting Policies 17 Note 2 Accounting Standards that have been issued but have not yet been adopted 36 Note 3 Critical Judgements in Applying Accounting Policies 36 Note 4 Assumptions Made about the Future and Other Major Sources of Estimation and Uncertainty 37 Note 5 Exceptional Items 38 Note 6 Material Items of Income and Expenditure 39 Note 7 Events After the Balance Sheet Date 39 Note 8 Service Expenditure Analysis 40 Note 9 Adjustments between Accounting Basis and Funding Basis under Regulations 42 Note 10 Transfers to/from Earmarked Reserves 46 Note 11 Other Operating Expenditure 50 Note 12 Financing and Investment Income and Expenditure 50 Note 13 Taxation and Non-Specific Grant Income 50 Note 14 Property, Plant and Equipment 51 Note 15 Heritage Assets 56 Note 16 Investment Properties 58 Note 17 Intangible Assets 60 Note 18 Financial Instruments and Nature and Extent of Risks Arising from Financial Instruments 62 Note 19 Inventories 69 Note 20 Construction Contracts 69 Note 21 Debtors 69 Note 22 Cash and Cash Equivalents 70 Note 23 Assets Held for Sale 70 Note 24 Creditors 71 Note 25 Other Long Term Liabilities 71 Note
    [Show full text]
  • Boston-Profile-FINAL.Pdf
    Profile 02/12/2014 BOSTON BIG LOCAL COMMUNITY PROFILE Contents Page 3 What is Big Local - Background Page 4 Our Big Local Partnership Page 5 Creating the Big Local Plan, What it ’ s not about Page 6 What can you do, Contacts Pages 7 - 8 Introduction Page 9 Boston Big Local Area Pages 10 - 11 History Pages 11 - 12 Overview Pages 13 - 15 Population Pages 16 - 17 Employment Pages 18 - 22 Housing Pages 22 - 25 Benefit changes - impact on Boston Pages 26 - 28 Transport Pages 29 - 30 Deprivation Pages 31 - 32 Health Pages 33 - 34 Education Pages 35 - 37 Crime Page 38 Placecheck Group’ s feedback Pages 39 - 55 Boston Big Local Consultation Pages 56 - 60 Annex A Street list and postcodes of Big Local area Page 62 Bibliography Page 63 Thanks 2 02/12/2014 BOSTON BIG LOCAL COMMUNITY PROFILE What is Big Local? Background Big Local is an exciting opportunity for residents in 150 areas around England to use at least £1million to make a lasting positive difference to their communities. Central Boston has been selected as one of these areas and we are in the early stages of applying for the first instalment from the £1 million to help the residents from within the Boston Big Local area as defined on the map. Local Trust is the national organisation running Big Local. Big Local funding comes from a £200m plus investment from the Big Lottery Fund. Local Trust’s mission is to enable people to make their communities better places to live. They do this by helping them develop and use their skills and confidence to identify what matters most to them, and to take action to change things for the better, now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
    Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Water Boston Borough Council October 2010 Prepared by: ................................ Checked by: .............................. Roy Lobley Richard Ramsden Associate Director Senior Engineer Approved by: ........................... Andy Yarde Regional Director Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Final to client RR AY April 2011 5th Floor, 2 City Walk, Leeds, LS11 9AR Telephone: 0113 391 6800 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60034187 Reference RE01 Date Created October 2010 This document is confidential and the copyright of AECOM Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. f:\projects\50016i boston sfra (revision)\reports\boston sfra final march11.docx Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Development Planning...................................................................................................................................................... 9 East Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]