<<

Faculty of Education and Arts School of Humanities & Social Science http://www.newcastle.edu.au/school/hss/ Newcastle Campus University Drive, Callaghan 2308 Room: MC127 McMullin Building Phone: 4921 5213 Office hours: 9:00am – 5:00pm Fax: 4921 6933 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/school/hss/

THEO2002 - Christ: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow Course Outline

Course Co-ordinator: Prof. John McDowell Room: MC108c McMullin Building Ph: 492 18759 Fax: 492 16933 Email: [email protected] Consultation hours: TBA through email

Semester Semester 2 - 2009 Unit Weighting 10 Teaching Methods Lecture Seminar

Brief Course Description This course studies in detail the variety of beliefs which have been, and are held about Jesus Christ. Students will examine historical documents and beliefs about Jesus Christ from the , Patristic, and Reformation periods.

Particular emphasis will be placed on contemporary debate about the nature of Jesus in a global context. Students will be expected to reflect critically on contemporary understandings of Jesus which question his identification as the Christ (Messiah) and offer alternative identifications. They will also be expected to reflect critically on the identification of Jesus as God and the implications which competing theories have for claims to his divinity and humanity. Students will be expected to deal, thus, with writings of Christian and non-Christian theologians. They will note how themes identifiable in previous eras may resurface in new forms in contemporary debate.

1 Recognising the increasingly global nature of theology, students will also be expected to engage with formulated not only in Western academic theology, but in Africa, Asia, the Pacific, the Caribbean and South America and examine how context shapes understandings of Jesus. As context is broader in scope than geography, students will examine how other cultural phenomena, (eg., liberation theology, feminism, postmodernism) also impinge on this theological task.

Contact Hours Seminar for 1 Hour per Week for the Full Term Lecture for 2 Hours per Week for the Full Term

Learning Materials/Texts SEE BELOW

Course Objectives The aim of the course is to enable students to:

* Gain an historical perspective on the question of ; * Reflect critically on the factors and presuppositions which shape different Christologies; * Gain an understanding of a wide range of Christological beliefs; * Engage critically with that range of Christological beliefs; * Identify their own theological stance and awareness of its place within a diverse variety of beliefs; * Articulate and defend their own theological stance; * Develop new Christologies in the light of cultural and philosophical change; * Locate their Christological beliefs within a broader nexus of belief.

Course Content Lectures Students will be required to attend two one hour lectures each week.

Seminars Students will be required to attend a one hour seminar each week. Depending on the size of the cohort it is expected that faculty will lead the first 7 workshops and the remaining sessions will be led by students as a part of the assessment regime of the course.

Assessment Items Essays / Written 3 totalling 4500 words for 90% of the final mark. Assignments Other: (please Seminar leadership task specify) 10% of the final mark.

Assumed Knowledge Introduction to Theological Method

Callaghan Campus Timetable THEO2002 CHRIST: YESTERDAY, TODAY AND TOMORROW Enquiries: School of Humanities and Social Science Semester 2 - 2009 Lecture Wednesday 14:00 - 16:00 [V27] and Seminar Wednesday 16:00 - 17:00 [W243]

IMPORTANT UNIVERSITY INFORMATION

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

Academic integrity, honesty, and a respect for knowledge, truth and ethical practices are fundamental to the business of the University. These principles are at the core of all academic endeavour in teaching, learning and research. Dishonest practices contravene academic values, compromise the integrity of research and devalue the quality of learning. To 2 preserve the quality of learning for the individual and others, the University may impose severe sanctions on activities that undermine academic integrity. There are two major categories of academic dishonesty:

Academic fraud is a form of academic dishonesty that involves making a false representation to gain an unjust advantage. Without limiting the generality of this definition, it can include:

a) falsification of data;

b) using a substitute person to undertake, in full or part, an examination or other assessment item;

c) reusing one's own work, or part thereof, that has been submitted previously and counted towards another course (without permission);

d) making contact or colluding with another person, contrary to instructions, during an examination or other assessment item;

e) bringing material or device(s) into an examination or other assessment item other than such as may be specified for that assessment item; and

f) making use of computer software or other material and device(s) during an examination or other assessment item other than such as may be specified for that assessment item.

g) contract cheating or having another writer compete for tender to produce an essay or assignment and then submitting the work as one's own.

Plagiarism is the presentation of the thoughts or works of another as one's own. University policy prohibits students plagiarising any material under any circumstances. Without limiting the generality of this definition, it may include: a) copying or paraphrasing material from any source without due acknowledgment;

b) using another person's ideas without due acknowledgment;

c) collusion or working with others without permission, and presenting the resulting work as though it were completed independently.

Turnitin is an electronic text matching system .During assessing any assessment item the University may - · Reproduce this assessment item and provide a copy to another member of the University; and/or

· Communicate a copy of this assessment item to a text matching service (which may then retain a copy of the item on its database for the purpose of future checking).

· Submit the assessment item to other forms of plagiarism checking

RE-MARKS AND MODERATIONS Students can access the University's policy at: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/policylibrary/000769.html

MARKS AND GRADES RELEASED DURING TERM

All marks and grades released during term are indicative only until formally approved by the Head of School.

SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES AFFECTING ASSESSMENT ITEMS

Extension of Time for Assessment Items, Deferred Assessment and Special Consideration for Assessment Items or Formal Written Examinations items must be submitted by the due date in the Course Outline unless the Course Coordinator approves an extension. Unapproved late submissions will be penalised in line with the University policy.

Requests for Extensions of Time must be lodged no later than the due date of the item. This applies to students:

· applying for an extension of time for submission of an assessment item on the basis of medical, compassionate, 3 hardship/trauma or unavoidable commitment; or

· whose attendance at or performance in an assessment item or formal written examination has been or will be affected by medical, compassionate, hardship/trauma or unavoidable commitment.

Students must report the circumstances, with supporting documentation, as outlined in the Special Circumstances Affecting Assessment Items Procedure at: http://www.newcastle.edu.au/policylibrary/000641.html

Note: different procedures apply for minor and major assessment tasks.

Students should be aware of the following important deadlines:

· Special Consideration Requests must be lodged no later than 3 working days after the due date of submission or examination.

· Rescheduling Exam requests must be received no later than 10 working days prior the first date of the examination period.

Late applications may not be accepted . Students who cannot meet the above deadlines due to extenuating circumstances should speak firstly to their Program Officer or their Program Executive if studying in Singapore.

STUDENTS WITH A DISABILITY OR CHRONIC ILLNESS

University is committed to providing a range of support services for students with a disability or chronic illness. If you have a disability or chronic illness which you feel may impact on your studies please feel free to discuss your support needs with your lecturer or course coordinator.

Disability Support may also be provided by the Student Support Service (Disability). Students must be registered to receive this type of support. To register contact the Disability Liaison Officer on 02 4921 5766, email at: student- [email protected] . As some forms of support can take a few weeks to implement it is extremely important that you discuss your needs with your lecturer, course coordinator or Student Support Service staff at the beginning of each semester. For more information on confidentiality and documentation visit the Student Support Service (Disability) website: www.newcastle.edu.au/services/disability .

CHANGING YOUR ENROLMENT

Students enrolled after the census dates listed in the link below are liable for the full cost of their student contribution or fees for that term.

http://www.newcastle.edu.au/study/fees/censusdates.html

Students may withdraw from a course without academic penalty on or before the last day of term. Any withdrawal from a course after the last day of term will result in a fail grade.

Students cannot enrol in a new course after the second week of term , except under exceptional circumstances. Any application to add a course after the second week of term must be on the appropriate form, and should be discussed with staff in the Student Hubs or with your Program Executive at PSB if you are a Singapore student.

To check or change your enrolment online go to myHub: https://myhub.newcastle.edu.au

STUDENT INFORMATION & CONTACTS

Various services are offered by the Student Support Unit: www.newcastle.edu.au/service/studentsupport/

The Student Hubs are a one-stop shop for the delivery of student related services and are the first point of contact for students studying in Australia. Student Hubs are located at: Callaghan Campus Port Macquarie students Shortland Hub: Level 3, Shortland Building contact your program officer or Hunter Hub: Level 2, Student Services Centre [email protected] 4 Phone 4921 5000 City Precinct City Hub & Information Common, University Singapore students House contact your PSB Program Executive

Central Coast Campus (Ourimbah) Student Hub: Opposite the Main Cafeteria OTHER CONTACT INFORMATION Faculty Websites General enquiries www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/business-law/ Callaghan, City and Port Macquarie Phone: 02 4921 5000 www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/education-arts/ Email: [email protected] www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/engineering/ Ourimbah www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/health/ Phone: 02 4348 4030 Email: www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/science-it/ [email protected]

Rules Governing Undergraduate Academic Awards The Dean of Students www.newcastle.edu.au/policylibrary/000311.html Deputy Dean of Students (Ourimbah) Phone: 02 4921 5806; Rules Governing Postgraduate Academic Awards Fax: 02 4921 7151 www.newcastle.edu.au/policylibrary/000306.html Email: [email protected] Rules Governing Professional Doctorate Awards www.newcastle.edu.au/policylibrary/000580.html

This course outline will not be altered after the second week of the term except under extenuating circumstances with Head of School approval. Students will be notified in advance of the change.

5 Weekly Tutorial Reading

Week Date Lecture Topic & Assessment due dates 1 29/07/2009 How Many Jesuses make a Christ? (JMcD) NA 2 5/08/2009 Unity and Diversity of the Biblical Witnesses (CP) Gerald O’Collins, Christology , ch. 2 3 12/08/2009 Cut-Price Heresy and a Council too Far? Athanasius and the Arians (BP) TBA 4 19/08/2009 Anselm, Godfather of Atoning Violence? (DC) Gustaf Aulen, Christus Victor , ch. V J. Denney Weaver, ‘Violence in Christian Theology’, pp. 225-239. 5 26/08/2009 Here Today, Gone Tomorrow! Modernity’s Losing Interest in the Christ? (JMcD) BOOK REVIEW/ASSIGNMENT TASK DUE FOR WEEK 5 6 2/09/2009 The Return of the King: Barmen’s Political Christ and the Ambiguity of Resistance (JR) Barmen Theological Declaration (1934) TBA 7 9/09/2009 The Christ Within? Christology and the Psychology of Religion (KB) Carl Jung, ‘The Autonomy of the Unconscious’, in Psychology and Religion, West and East , ch. 1. 8 16/09/2009 Taking Sufferers Down from the Cross: Christology, Evil, Human Suffering, & the Nature of Mission (PS) TBA 9 23/09/2009 The Matrix of Divine Maleness! Issues for Feminist Theologies (DC) Lisa Isherwood, Liberating Christologies , ch. 4 Mercy Amba Oduyoye, in Susan Frank Parsons (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminist Theology , ch. 9 Semester break 10 14/10/2009 READING WEEK ESSAY DUE FOR WEEK 11 11 21/10/2009 Stirring the Melting Pot: Is Religious Pluralism Indifferent to Religious Difference? (AN & DC) TBA

6 Jacques Dupuis, Christianity and the Religions: From Confrontation to Dialogue , pp. 17-44. 12 28/10/2009 Apocalypse Now! Eschatology and the Apocalyptic Christ (JMcD) Karl Rahner, ‘The Hermeneutics of Eschatological Assertsions’, in Theological Investigations 4, pp. 323-346 John C. McDowell, ‘For What May We Legitimately Hope? Karl Barth’s “Theology of Hope”’, Whitefield Briefings 5.5 (July, 2000). 13 4/11/2009 Summing up, Student Presentations and Course Evaluation (JMcD)

Examination period: Monday 9 Nov to Friday 27 Nov 2008

7 Assessments Please note that ALL THE TUTORIAL READING IS COMPULSORY, and those who demonstrate an inability to reason concerning the text will be have marks deducted from their final presentation grade for each occasion of perceptible ignorance of the text . By way of encouragement here, the texts relate directly to material covered by the classes and are therefore integral to the learning experience involved in the course.

There are several forms of assessment comprising the final assessment grade for the course:

A) 1x Book Review of 1500 words 30% B) 1x Essay of 3000 words 60% C) 1x Presentation 10%

A) EITHER (A1) Book Review OR (A2) Assignment Task (A1) Book Review Choose one of the books EITHER on the course’s ‘recommended reading’ booklist OR one you have discovered in the university library on the theme of the person and/or work of Jesus. Some guidance for a successful review: • Books are usually given by academic journals to scholars who are experts in the field , scholars who have read numerous books on the topic(s) addressed. Therefore your review should involve you reading more than just the book for review. • Only briefly describe what the book is doing and how it does it. Overly descriptive essays only achieve a C/2:2 grade at most. • It is good practice to focus on one area/issue/argument (or two overlapping areas) in the book being reviewed, and critically discuss it. The book may do this well or badly, or even reasonably well but need to be supplemented – it is your task to explain this, and compare it to other treatments on this matter. • Have a look at book reviews in academic journals to give you a rough idea of how to write one. • Unlike an academic review, provide a bibliography of works used at the end.

(A2) Assignment Task Choose from ONE of the following two options:  Write an article for the student newspaper on ‘the meaning of Jesus as the Christ’.  Design the outline of a lecture, or school class, exploring the meaning and significance of the cross for the knowledge of God. [If power-point slides or class handouts are used, please provide a 1000 word description of the slides, rather than 1500 words set for a review or article] Some guidance notes on these projects: • These projects are not excuses for intellectual slackness or ‘talking off the top of your head’ – you are to research and write knowledgeably concerning complex issues that people have thought about, debated, and fought over for 2 millennia. • Provide a bibliography of works used at the end.

8 B) Essay Questions and Reading

IMPORTANT ESSAY WRITING GUIDANCE NOTES 1) Not all the books at any one time may be available – search for others on these issues. • For instance, the library online catalogue can be helpful in searching for other books; • The Bonus catalogue can get you some of the books not in our library (but order these well in time); • The ATLA Religion Database can aid in identifying articles; • Use the internet sparingly and critically (good for some primary etexts – for instance, Wikipedia is not a reputable and quotable research tool). 2) Carefully read the question – the essays may not be asking what one might expect from a quick glance. 3) The essay has to reflect an appropriate knowledge of the issue(s) and the key figures involved, an ability to critically engage with the main conversation partners, and carefully lucid and evidenced reasoning. 4) At level 1 an essay should use no less than 5 major resources; level 2 a minimum of 7 major pieces of resource; and level 3 a minimum of 10 major pieces of resource. 5) Avoid using ‘I’ in the essay – e.g., ‘I think that…’; ‘it appears to me…’ and so on. 6) Use gender inclusive language – e.g., ‘humanity’, or the like, rather than ‘mankind’ or ‘man’.

Sykes, S.W. & Clayon, J.P., Christ, Faith and What is the theological significance, if any, History , see essay by O’Neill of the ‘empty tomb’ of the Jesus Pannenberg, Wolfhart, Jesus: God and Man tradition? Torrance, T. F., Space, Time and Resurrection Walker, Andrew (ed.), Different Gospels , see Avis, Paul (ed.), The Resurrection of Jesus Christ essay by Tom Smail Barth, Karl, Dogmatics in Outline Wright, N.T., Jesus and the Victory of God Barton, Stephen & Graham Stanton (eds.), Resurrection Brown, Raymond E., The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus Describe Martin Luther’s understanding of Bultmann, Rudolf, The New Testament and justification and assess both its novelty and Mythology validity. Carnley, Peter, The Structure of Resurrection Althaus, Paul, The Theology of Martin Luther Belief Braaten, Carl, Justification: the Article by which Davis, S.T., Risen Indeed the Church stands or falls Davis, S.T. (ed.), The Resurrection Forde, Gerhard O., ‘The Work of Christ’, in Carl D’Costa, Gavin, Resurrection Reconsidered E. Braaten and Robert W. Jenson (eds.), Fergusson, David, ‘Interpreting the Resurrection’, Christian Dogmatics Volume 2 , 1-99 (esp. Scottish Journal of Theology , 38, (1985), 47-63). 287-305 Küng, Hans, Justification Geering, Lloyd, Resurrection: A Symbol of Hope Lohse, Bernhard, Martin Luther’s Theology: Its Küng, Hans, Eternal Life Historial and Systematic Development Lash, Nicholas, Theology on the Way to Emmaus Lohse, Bernhard, Martin Luther: An Introduction Lüdemann, Gerd, The Resurrection of Jesus: to his Life and Work History, Experience, Theology Lull, Timothy (ed.), Martin Luther: Selected Lüdemann, Gerd, What really happened to Jesus? Writings Mackey, James P., Jesus: the Man and the Myth McGrath, Alister, Iustitia Dei (2nd edition) O’Collins, Gerald, Jesus Risen McGrath, Alister, Reformation Thought (3rd O’Collins, Gerald, The Easter Jesus edition) O’Donovan, Oliver, Resurrection and Moral Order 9 Pannenberg, Wolfhart & Lehmann, Paul, Leonardo Boff, Jesus Christ Liberator Condemnations of the Reformation: Do José Miguez Bonino, Faces of Jesus: Latin They Still Divide? American Christologies Tavard, George, Justification William J. La Due, Jesus Among the Theologians , Toon, Peter, Justification and Sanctification ch 5 Torrance, Thomas F., God and Rationality , ch 3 David Ford (ed.), The Modern Theologians , Pt. IV Yule, George, ‘Luther’s Attack on the Latin Gustavo Gutierrez, A Theology of Liberation Heresy’, in Trevor Hart and Daniel Thimell Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God (ed.s), Christ in Our Place , 224-252 Takatso Mofokeng, The crucified among the crossbearers : towards a Black Christology The recent Roman Catholic-Lutheran agreement Christopher Rowland, The Cambridge Companion on justification and some responses can be to Liberation Theology found at . Jon Sobrino, Christology at the Crossroads Jon Sobrino and Ignacio Ellacuría (eds.), Systematic Theology: Perspectives from Assess the significance of the person of Liberation Theology Christ to the theology of the baptism Dorothee Sölle, Christ the Representative of infants. Baillie, D M, Theology of the Sacraments Theologically evaluate the Role that Barth, Karl, Church Dogmatics IV/4, Fragment Christology plays in the philosophy of Volume Beasley-Murray, G. R., Baptism in the New Immanuel Kant Testament Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason Bromiley, Geoffrey, Children of Promise: The Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason Case for Baptizing Infants (: Immanuel Kant, ‘Lectures on the Philosophical T&T Clark, 1979). Doctrine of Religion’, in Religion and Buchanan, Colin, Infant Baptism and the Gospel Rational Philosophy Buckley, James J., ‘Christian Community, Baptism Immanuel Kant, Religion Within the Boundaries of and Lord’s Supper’, in John Webster (ed.), Mere Reason # The Cambridge Companion to Karl Barth Karl Barth, Protestant Theology in the Nineteenth (Cambridge: CUP, 2000), 195-211. Century Church of Scotland Commission, The Biblical Peter Byrne, Moral Interpretation of Religion Doctrine of Baptism Philip Clayton, Problem of God in Moral Thought Cullmann, Oscar, Baptism in the New Testament Michel Despland, Kant on History and Religion Hartwell, H., ‘Karl Barth on Baptism’, Scottish Garrett Green, Theology, Hermeneutics and Journal of Theology 22 (1969), 10-29. Imagination: The Case of Interpretation at Hunsinger, George, ‘Baptism and the Soteriology the End of Modernity of Forgiveness’, in International Journal of John Milbank, Being Reconciled: Ontology and Systematic Theology 2 (2000), 247-266. Pardon Jeremias, Joachim, Baptism in the First Four John Milbank, Word Made Strange Centuries Stephen Palmquist, Jewett, Paul, Infant Baptism and the Covenant of http://www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/hp.html Grace Carl A. Raschke, Moral Action: God and History Macquarrie, John, A Guide to the Sacraments in the Thought of Immanuel Kant Moltmann, Jürgen, The Church in the Power of the Bernard M.G. Reardon, Kant as Philosophical Spirit Theologian Torrance, Thomas F., God and Rationality , ch 6 Clement C.J. Webb, Kant’s Philosophy of Religion esp. 156-161 Alan Wood, Kant’s Moral Religion Torrance, Thomas F., Theology in Reconciliation Wright, David, Infant Baptism in Historical Critically assess the relation of Christology Perspective and the concept of ‘sacrifice’. G. Ashby, Sacrifice, Its Nature and Purpose Critically evaluate the main characteristics (London: SCM, 1988). of Christologies of Liberation 10 Caputo and Scanlon (eds.), God, the Gift and Charles Elliott, et al., Christian Faith and Political Postmodernism Hopes: A Reply to E.R. Norman Robert Daly, Christian Sacrifice (Washington Gustavo Gutierrez, A Theology of Liberation D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, Stanley Hauerwas and William H. Willamon, 1978). Resident Aliens Robert Daly, The Origins of the Christian John Milbank, ‘Can Morality Be Christian?’, in Doctrine of Sacrifice (Darton, Longman and The Word Made Strange Todd, 1978). John Milbank, ‘Politics: Socialism By Grace’, in René Girard, The Scapegoat (The John Hopkins Being Reconciled University Press, 1986). John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory René Girard, Violence and the Sacred (London: Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God The Atholone Press, 1995). Jürgen Moltmann, The and the Kingdom of Timothy J. Gorringe, God’s Just Vengeance; God Crime, Punishment and the Rhetoric of Jürgen Moltmann, The Way of Jesus Christ Salvation (Cambridge: CUP, 1996). H. Richard Niebuhr, Christ and Culture Mark S. Heim, Saved from Sacrifice: A Theology E.R. Norman, Christianity and the World Order of the Cross (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2006). Oliver O’Donovan, Resurrection and Moral Order Robyn Horner, Rethinking God as Gift Alan Richardson, The Political Christ Grace Jantzen, Becoming Divine Jeffrey Stout, Ethics After Babel L. Gregory Jones, Embodying Forgiveness Kathryn Tanner, The Politics of God Herbert McCabe, God Matters , ch. 8 Ronald Thiemann, Religion in Public Life Jean-Luc Marion, God Without Being Miroslav Volf, Exclusion and Embrace John Milbank, Being Reconciled: Ontology and William Werpehowski, ‘Karl Barth and Politics’, Pardon , chs. 3, 5, 6, 8 in John Webster (ed.), The Cambridge John Milbank, Theology and Social Theory Companion to Karl Barth John Milbank, The Word Made Strange , ch. 9 Rowan Williams, On Christian Theology , Part 5 John Sanders (ed.), Atonement and Violence: A Rowan Williams, The Truce of God Theological Conversation (Nashville: Haddon Willmer, ‘Does Jesus Call Us to Political Abingdon Press, 2006). Discipleship?’, in Christian Faith and Raymund Schwager, Must there be Scapegoats? Political Hope: A Reply to E.R. Norman Violence and Redemption in the Bible John Howard Yoder, Body Politics (Gracewing, 1987). John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus: Vicit Kathryn Tanner, Economy of Grace Agnus Noster Miroslav Volf, Exclusion and Embrace Miroslav Volf, Free of Charge • Choose an Ethical Issue and Discuss Graham Ward, Christ and Culture , ch. 9 What Light, if any, a Christological J. Denney Weaver, The Non Violent Atonement Account of God Sheds upon it. (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2001). Stephen Webb, Construct your own bibliography Walter Wink, Engaging the Powers Frances Young, Sacrifice and the Death of Christ (London: SPCK, 1973).

Provide a critical account of the Politics of Jesus José Miguez Bonino, Toward A Christian Political

Ethics

11 C) Student Presentation Week 13

The presentations will be given in the form of two sets of debates:

Debate 1 This house believes that the study of Christology has no significance for the shape of human living.

Debate 2 This house believes that the early church was mistaken in the direction its Christology took.

Guidance notes for the debate: • Teams of 3-4 persons, two teams per debate • Teams should meet well in advance to identify the main features/arguments relevant to the debate • Each person in the team must take one or more (depending on how many are identified) of these features identified • Research for and plan out clearly the argument being presented • Attempt to anticipate your opponents’ arguments • Each presentation should be NO LONGER THAN 5 MINUTES • Be prepared in class to make a response to your respondent, as well as to act as respondent to other people’s presentational arguments

Criteria to be assessed: • Effective communication, clarity of presentation • time-keeping • fullness and depth of research • sharply well-reasoned arguments • engaging well with respondents

12 Select Recommended Reading G.A. Barker, Jesus In The World's Faiths: Leading Thinkers From Five Faiths Reflect On His Meaning (Maryknoll: Orbis, 2005). Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics I. 2 Karl Barth, The Humanity of God Marcus Bockmuehl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jesus Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Christology Marcus Borg and N.T. Wright, The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions , Jesus and the Word Eberhard Busch, The Great Passion: An Introduction to Karl Barth’s Theology G. Cross, ‘Christianity and Christology’, Journal of Religion 4.6 (1924), 600-610. Oscar Cullmann, The Christology of the New Testament S.T. Davis (ed.), The Incarnation P. De Nui, & D. Lim, Communicating Christ in the Buddhist World , William Carey Library, 2007. J.D.G. Dunn, Christology in the Making David Fergusson , The Doctrine of the Incarnation Today, Expository Times, 113.3 (2001), 75-79. Colin Gunton, Yesterday and Today: A Study of Continuities in Christology (London: Darton, Longmann & Todd, 1983). John Hick, The Metaphor of God Incarnate: Christology in a Pluralistic Age (Louisville: WJKP, 2006). Larry Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity Elizabeth Johnson, She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse Immanuel Kant, Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason Veli-Matti Karkkainen, Christology: A Global Introduction (Baker, 2003). Walter Kasper, Jesus the Christ (New York: Paulist, 2002). J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines V. Kuster, The Many Faces of Christ (New York: Orbis, 2001). Sallie McFague, Models of God: Theology for an Ecological, Nuclear Age (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1988). J.P. Mackey, Jesus: The Man and the Myth (NY: Paulist, 1979). Donald M. MacKinnon, “‘Substance’ in Christology- A Cross-bench View”, in Christ, Faith And History: Cambridge Studies in Christology , ed. S.W. Sykes and J.P. Clayton (Cambridge: CUP, 1972), 279-300. Donald M. MacKinnon Themes in Theology: The Threefold Cord (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1987). John Macquarrie, Jesus Christ in Modern Thought (London: SCM, 1990), 348ff. E.L. Mascall, Theology and the Gospel of Christ (London: SPCK, 1986). John Meyendorff, Christ in Eastern Christian Thought (Crestwood: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1975). Jürgen Moltmann, Jesus Christ for Today’s World (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1994). Jürgen Moltmann, The Crucified God Jürgen Moltmann, The Way of Jesus Christ C.F.D. Moule, The Origin of Christology Wolfhart Pannenberg, Jesus God and Man (Louisville: WJKP, 1983). Karl Rahner, Foundations of Christian Faith Rosemary Radford Ruether, ‘Feminism and Jewish-Christian Dialogue’, in The Myth of Christian Uniqueness , eds. John Hick & Paul F Knitter (London: SCM, 1987), 137-148. J. Sahajananda, Hindu Christ: Jesus' Message Through Eastern Eyes (Natl Book Network, 2006). E P Sanders, Jesus and Judaism (London: SCM, 1985). E.P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus (London: Penguin, 1995). Friedrich Schleiermacher, The Christian Faith Robert Schreiter (ed.), Faces of Jesus in Africa (London: SCM, 1992). Hans Schwarz, Christology (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998). Jon Sobrino, Christology at the Crossroads (WIPF & Stock, 2002). Basil Studer, Trinity and Incarnation Kathryn Tanner, ‘Incarnation, Cross and Atonement: A Feminist Inspired Re-appraisal’, ATR , 86 (2004), 35-56. Gerd Theissen, and A. Merz, The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1998). I.B. Torrance, Christology after Chalcedon (Eugene: Wipf & Stock, 1998). T. F. Torrance, The Trinitarian Faith (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993). Frances Young, From Nicaea to Chalcedon Frances Young, The Making of the Creeds

13