GASTROENTEROLOGY Part One of Two Infectious Esophagitis Pill-Induced Esophagitis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GASTROENTEROLOGY Part One of Two Infectious Esophagitis Pill-Induced Esophagitis 1/20/2016 GASTROENTEROLOGY Part One of Two Dipali Yeh, M.S. PA-C Rutgers Physician Assistant Program Certification/Recertification Examination Review Course June 2015 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey PANCE/PANRE Review Course Infectious Esophagitis • Immunocompromised • Risks: AIDS/DM/Steroids • Odynophagia/dysphagia • CMV/HSV-other clinical features • Diagnosis: endoscopy – CMV esophagitis: large ulcers – Herpes: shallow ulcers – Candida: white plaques • Treatment: specific to the type of infection – CMV esophagitis: valgancyclovir/foscarnet – Herpes: acyclovir – Candida: Amphotericin B PANCE/PANRE Review Course Pill-induced esophagitis • Offending agents – Tetracycline – Doxycycline –KCl –NSAIDs • PPttiresentation – Odynophagia/dysphagia/retrosternal chest pain – Several hrs-days after ingestion • Endoscopy: varied findings • Study of choice: double contrast esophagram • Treatment: – Prevention – Remove offending agent 1 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Radiation Esophagitis • Presentation – Dysphagia several months following radiation treatment • Acute >>> Chronic • Mucosal edema/inflammation>>>impaired peristalsis/motility PANCE/PANRE Review Course Reflux Esophagitis • Etiology – Lower sphincter fails as barrier to stomach contents • Predisposing factors –GERD, PUD – Prolonged vomiting • Presentation – Heartburn, retrosternal burning – Radiation into the neck – Postprandial component • Findings – Superficial ulcerations – Distal esophagus • Definitive diagnostic: endoscopy PANCE/PANRE Review Course Motility Disorders • Achalasia • Scleroderma • Esophageal spasms • Zenker’s diverticulum 2 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Achalasia • Etiology unknown • Common in adults 30-60 yrs • Presentation – Gradual dysphagia: solids + liquids – Cough/choking/aspiration/pneumonia • Diagnostics – Barium swallow: Bird’s beak – endoscopy – Manometry: most sensitive • Treatment – Pharmacological: Ca+ channel blockers, isosorbide, local LES botox injections – Surgical: Dilatation, myotomy PANCE/PANRE Review Course Achalasia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAcha.JPG By Farnoosh Farrokhi, Michael F. Vaezi. [<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0">CC‐BY‐2.0</a>], <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AAcha.JPG">via Wikimedia Commons</a> PANCE/PANRE Review Course Scleroderma • 90% patients have esophageal involvement • Part of CREST syndrome • Clinical: GERD, dysphagia to solids & liquids • Diagnosis – Barium swallow: aperistalsis – Manometry: most sensitive; decreased LES tone • Treatment: proton pump inhibitors – omeprazole (Prilosec), pantoprazole (Protonix) • Complication: GERD 3 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal spasms • Etiology: not understood; possible nitric oxide deficiency • Clinical: chest pain/dysphagia • Diagnosis: “corkscrew” esophagus on barium • Treatment: Ca+ channel blockers, hycosamine, tricyclic antidepressants PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal spasms http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ADiffuser_Oesophagusspasmus_002‐13.jpg By Hellerhoff (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html) or CC‐BY‐3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons PANCE/PANRE Review Course Zenker’s diverticulum • Outpouching of posterior hypopharynx • History: esophageal spasms, hiatal hernia • Older patients/insidious onset • Clinical: dysphagia/regurgitation/halitosis • Diagnosis: Barium swallow • Asymptomatic = no treatment • Symptomatic = myotomy/diverticulectomy 4 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Mallory-Weiss tear • Tear in the GE junction • Forceful vomiting/retching • Clinical feature: hematemesis, self-limiting • Diagnosis: generally clinically, also endoscope • Treatment: – Most heal w/in 48 hours – Endoscopic epi/thermal coagulation PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal neoplasms • General Considerations – 50-70yrs old – M:F=3:1 – Squamous cell: 95% – Adenocarcinoma – Risk Factors • Squamous Cell: tobacco and alcohol abuse • Adenocarcinoma: Barrett’s, obesity PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal neoplasms • Clinical features – Dysphagia>solid food + wt loss – Pneumonia/Voice hoarseness – Chest pain • Diagnosis – iiiillnitially-bbiarium study d – definitive-endoscopy • Treatment: surgery • Prognosis: 5-yr survival rate < 20% 5 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal strictures • Complication of GERD/Esophagitis • Clinical presentation – Dysphagia to solid foods over months-years • Diagnosis-biopsy • Treatment – Endoscopic dilatation – Long term PPIs – Refractory: endoscopic triamcinolone PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal varices • General considerations – Most common cause of UGIB secondary to portal HTN • Risk factors ↑ chance of bleeding –Size – Red wale markings – Liver di sease severi ty – Active ETOH use • Presentation – High-grade: hematemesis/hypovolemia – Low-grade: melena + iron-deficiency anemia PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal varices Treatment • Acute – Hemodynamic stability: fluids/blood products – Pharmacological • Octreotide-vasoactive agent • Vitamin K-abnormal PT • Lactulose-encephalopathy • Antibiotic prophylaxis • Endoscopic • Sclerotherapy • Mechanical tamponade • TIPS procedure • Mortality – 30% during 1st bleeding episode – 50% within 6 weeks 6 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Esophageal obstructive entities • Esophageal Webs • Schatzkiʼs ring – Plummer-Vinson – GERD/hiatal hernia – Proximal esophagus – Distal esophagus – Presentation – Presentation • Food impaction • Food impaction – Barium swallow – Barium swallow •shelf • Lower esophageal narrowing PANCE/PANRE Review Course GERD • 3 mechanisms – Transient LES relaxation, increased intra-abdominal pressure, spontaneous reflux • Risk factors – Alcohol, caffeine, obesity, smoking • Clini cal f eat ures – Heartburn – Chest pain/halitosis/cough • Diagnosis: – Ambulatory 24hr pH monitoring: most sensitive/gold standard – Endoscopy • refractory to secretory therapy • Alarm symptoms (next slide) • Long-standing history (Barrett’s) PANCE/PANRE Review Course GERD • Alarm symptoms – Refractory heartburn – Dysphagia – Unintentional Weight loss – GI bleed/anemia 7 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Diagnostic testing in Upper GI Pathology • 1. Endoscopy – Refractory to secretory therapy – Patients with alarm symptoms (next slide) – Chronic reflux – Barrett’s predisposition • 2. ambulatory pH monitoring – Confirm GERD – GERD sx + negative endoscopy – Refractory to longstanding PPI treatmetn – Refractory to antireflux surgery • 3. Manometry – peristaltic abnormalities; – Preop antireflux surgery PANCE/PANRE Review Course GERD Treatment options • Lifestyle/diet modifications: 20% effective – *weight loss • Three main options – Antacids • Maalox, mylanta, gaviscon – H2 bl ock ers • Cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine, nizatidine – Proton pump inhibitors • Omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, esomeprazole, dexlansoprazole – ..also…Prokinetics (metoclopramide)/Baclofen only after diagnostic eval • Surgery – Nissen fundoplication – Stretta procedure – Endocinch PANCE/PANRE Review Course GERD Treatment approach • Intermittent/mild symptoms: – Weight loss – Antacids – H2blockers twice daily • Moderate symptoms: – Once a d ay PPI x 8 week s: th erapy of ch oi ce – If symptoms continue thereafter, maintenance PPI – H2 blockers + PPI combination therapy • Risks associated with PPIs – If (+)osteoporosis, can remain on PPI therapy – Risk factor for Clostridium difficile – short term PPIs: CAP – No need for alteration with clopidogrel (re: adverse cardiovascular events) 8 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Gastritis • Atrophic – Risk for gastric CA, pernicious anemia, autoimmune • Hemorrhagic – ICU/Burn • Infectious – H. pylori- most common cause • Presentation – Nondescript abd pain, anorexia, bloating, nausea • Treatment – Etiology-dependent PANCE/PANRE Review Course Helicobacter pylori • Gram-negative spiral-shaped bacillus • Clinical presentation: nausea/abdominal pain • Diagnosis: based on history – Urea breath test (most sensitive)/fecal antigen assay – Endoscopy-but not for uncomplicated disease PANCE/PANRE Review Course Helicobacter pylori • Treatment • combination therapy x 14d –1st line: Triple therapy: PPI + amox + clarithromycin – Quadruple therapy: PPI + bismuth + 2 antibiotics • (cl arith romyci n + amoxi cilli n, t et racycli ne + met ronid azol e) 9 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course PUD • Break in the mucosa • Duodenal > gastric • Risks: smokers/long-term NSAID use • 2 major causes – Chronic NSAID use – Hpylori infection- most common PANCE/PANRE Review Course PUD • Clinical features – Hallmark: epigastric pain – Duodenal: improves with food – Gastric: worsens with food • Diagnosis: upper endoscopy • Treatment – Avoid irritating factors – Combination therapy – misoprostol PANCE/PANRE Review Course Gastric neoplasms • 3 types – Adenocarcinoma: 90-95% – Lymphoma – Gastrinoma (Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome) 10 1/20/2016 PANCE/PANRE Review Course Gastric neoplasms • Adenocarcinoma – 50-70yrs old – M:F = 2:1 – 5 year survival < 20% – Risk factors • Genetic: Familial/Blood Group A • Environmental: H. pylori/smoking/low socioeconomic • Predispositions: chronic gastritis/pernicious anemia PANCE/PANRE Review Course Gastric neoplasms • Adenocarcinoma – Clinical features • Early: can be asymptomatic • Later: cachexia, dyspepsia, weight loss, GIB • Virchow’s node • Sister Mary Joseph nodule • Krukenberg tumor PANCE/PANRE Review Course Gastric neoplasms • Adenocarcinoma – Diagnosis • endoscopy with biopsy – (>55 yrs old w/ new sx/fails antisecretory
Recommended publications
  • Retained Fecaliths After Laparoscopic Appendectomy Disappearing Spontaneously with Non-Operative Management
    IJCRI 2013;4(11):650–653. Katagiri et al. 650 www.ijcasereportsandimages.com CASE REPORT OPEN ACCESS Retained fecaliths after laparoscopic appendectomy disappearing spontaneously with non-operative management Hideki Katagiri, Mai Ishitani, Takashi Sakamoto, Yasuo Yoshinaga, Tadao Kubota, Akira Miyabe ABSTRACT ********* Introduction: Intra-abdominal abscess after doi:10.5348/ijcri-2013-11-402-CR-16 laparoscopic appendectomy is a well-known complication. In cases of perforated appendicitis, the frequency of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation can be up to 20%. However, intra-abdominal abscess due to retained fecaliths INTRODUCTION has rarely been reported. A retained fecalith following appendectomy is a rare complication A fecalith is often detected in cases of acute and it has been reported that retained fecaliths appendicitis. It can drop pre- or intraoperatively into the should be removed immediately after their peritoneal cavity [1]. The frequency of retained fecaliths diagnosis because of its potential to cause after appendectomy is unknown and only a few case abscess. We present a rare case of retained reports have been published [2]. Postoperative abscess fecaliths after laparoscopic appendectomy which after appendectomy is a well-known complication and, in disappeared spontaneously with non-operative cases of perforated appendicitis, the frequency can be up management. to 20% [3]. A retained fecalith can cause intra-abdominal abscess and the abscess often relapses despite adequate Keywords: Retained fecaliths, Laparoscopic drainage [4]. Previous reports recommended the removal appendectomy, Intra-abdominal abscess of complicated fecaliths after diagnosis. We present a very rare case of retained fecaliths after laparoscopic ********* appendectomy which disappeared spontaneously with non-operative management. Katagiri H, Ishitani M, Sakamoto T, Yoshinaga Y, Kubota T, Miyabe A.
    [Show full text]
  • Intussusception of the Appendix: New Trends and Comprehensive Analysis of 140 Case Reports Barbara Wexelman
    Yale University EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library School of Medicine 7-9-2009 Intussusception of the Appendix: New trends and comprehensive analysis of 140 case reports Barbara Wexelman Follow this and additional works at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl Recommended Citation Wexelman, Barbara, "Intussusception of the Appendix: New trends and comprehensive analysis of 140 case reports" (2009). Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. 469. http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ymtdl/469 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Medicine at EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. It has been accepted for inclusion in Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library by an authorized administrator of EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Intussusception of the Appendix: New trends and comprehensive analysis of 140 case reports A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF MEDICINE BY BARBARA A. WEXELMAN 2008 Barbara Wexelman 1 ABSTRACT Title: INTUSSUSCEPTION OF THE APPENDIX: NEW TRENDS AND COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF 140 PUBLISHED CASE REPORTS. Barbara A. Wexelman, Cassius Ochoa Chaar, and Walter Longo. Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Statement of Purpose: This paper uses 139 published case reports to understand the demographic, diagnostic, and treatment trends of intussusception of the appendix. Methods: Using the PubMed literature search engine to find all English references of “intussusception” and “appendix”, and reviewing those that contained actual case reports of intussusception of the appendix, we analyzed the demographics, presentation, diagnostic methods, surgical treatment, and histology from 140 articles representing data from 181 patients.
    [Show full text]
  • General Signs and Symptoms of Abdominal Diseases
    General signs and symptoms of abdominal diseases Dr. Förhécz Zsolt Semmelweis University 3rd Department of Internal Medicine Faculty of Medicine, 3rd Year 2018/2019 1st Semester • For descriptive purposes, the abdomen is divided by imaginary lines crossing at the umbilicus, forming the right upper, right lower, left upper, and left lower quadrants. • Another system divides the abdomen into nine sections. Terms for three of them are commonly used: epigastric, umbilical, and hypogastric, or suprapubic Common or Concerning Symptoms • Indigestion or anorexia • Nausea, vomiting, or hematemesis • Abdominal pain • Dysphagia and/or odynophagia • Change in bowel function • Constipation or diarrhea • Jaundice “How is your appetite?” • Anorexia, nausea, vomiting in many gastrointestinal disorders; and – also in pregnancy, – diabetic ketoacidosis, – adrenal insufficiency, – hypercalcemia, – uremia, – liver disease, – emotional states, – adverse drug reactions – Induced but without nausea in anorexia/ bulimia. • Anorexia is a loss or lack of appetite. • Some patients may not actually vomit but raise esophageal or gastric contents in the absence of nausea or retching, called regurgitation. – in esophageal narrowing from stricture or cancer; also with incompetent gastroesophageal sphincter • Ask about any vomitus or regurgitated material and inspect it yourself if possible!!!! – What color is it? – What does the vomitus smell like? – How much has there been? – Ask specifically if it contains any blood and try to determine how much? • Fecal odor – in small bowel obstruction – or gastrocolic fistula • Gastric juice is clear or mucoid. Small amounts of yellowish or greenish bile are common and have no special significance. • Brownish or blackish vomitus with a “coffee- grounds” appearance suggests blood altered by gastric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Twisted Bowels: Intestinal Obstruction Blake Briggs, MD Mechanical
    Twisted Bowels: Intestinal obstruction Blake Briggs, MD Objectives: define bowel obstructions and their types, pathophysiology, causes, presenting signs/symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment options, as well as the complications associated with them. Bowel Obstruction: the prevention of the normal digestive process as well as intestinal motility. 2 overarching categories: Mechanical obstruction: More common. physical blockage of the GI tract. Can be complete or incomplete. Complete obstruction typically is more severe and more likely requires surgical intervention. Functional obstruction: diffuse loss of intestinal motility and digestion throughout the intestine (e.g. failure of peristalsis). 2 possible locations: Small bowel: more common Large bowel All bowel obstructions have the potential risk of progressing to complete obstruction Mechanical obstruction Pathophysiology Mechanical blockage of flow à dilation of bowel proximal to obstruction à distal bowel is flattened/compressed à Bacteria and swallowed air add to the proximal dilation à loss of intestinal absorptive capacity and progressive loss of fluid across intestinal wall à dehydration and increasing electrolyte abnormalities à emesis with excessive loss of Na, K, H, and Cl à further dilation leads to compression of blood supply à intestinal segment ischemia and resultant necrosis. Signs/Symptoms: The goal of the physical exam in this case is to rule out signs of peritonitis (e.g. ruptured bowel). Colicky abdominal pain Bloating and distention: distention is worse in distal bowel obstruction. Hyperresonance on percussion. Nausea and vomiting: N/V is worse in proximal obstruction. Excessive emesis leads to hyponatremic, hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis with hypokalemia. Dehydration from emesis and fluid shifts results in dry mucus membranes and oliguria Obstipation: severe constipation or complete lack of bowel movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abnormal Presentation of Complicated Appendicitis Goubeaux C* and Adams J Removed
    Open Access Journal of Family Medicine Case Report The Abnormal Presentation of Complicated Appendicitis Goubeaux C* and Adams J removed. Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Dublin, OH 43016, USA Discussion *Corresponding author: Craig Goubeaux, Heritage Acute appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies in College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Dublin, medicine with more than 250,000 cases reported per year [5]. The OH 43016, USA lifetime prevalence is reported to be between 7-8% [5,7]. Diagnosis is Received: January 31, 2019; Accepted: March 12, typically based on a careful clinical history and physical examination 2019; Published: March 19, 2019 [1.7]. The signs and symptoms classically associated with appendicitis are periumbilical pain initially that migrates to right lower quadrant, The Case rebound tenderness, low-grade fever, anorexia, and elevated white A 60-year-old white male presented to our family practice with a blood cell count. chief complaint of isolated right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal There are pathologies that may mimic appendicitis such as an pain. It began one week prior after suspected food poisoning with anomalous congenital band, Meckel’s diverticulitis, spontaneous one episode of vomiting. The pain was a constant, dull ache ranging urinary extravasation, renal artery thrombosis or renal infarction between 1-5/10. It did not limit his activities as a farmer. He used [3]. Additionally, a mobile cecum is a congenital anomaly that may NSAIDs to help with the pain. During the past week all other review of systems were negative. Vitals signs were within normal lead to abnormal presentation of appendicitis which occurs in about limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Isquemia Gástrica Secundaria a Estenosis Crítica Del Tronco Celíaco Doi.Org/10.23938/ASSN.0248
    NOTAS CLÍNICAS0 Gastric ischemia due to critical stenosis of the celiac trunk Isquemia gástrica secundaria a estenosis crítica del tronco celíaco doi.org/10.23938/ASSN.0248 C. Saldaña Dueñas, A. Elosua González, A. Guerra Lacunza Contenido Gastric ischemia due to critical stenosis of the celiac trunk 123 ABSTRACT RESUMEN Abstract 123 Gastric ischemia (GI) results from diffuse or localized La isquemia gástrica resulta de la insuficiencia vascular Resumen 123 vascular insufficiency caused by different aetiologies difusa o localizada causada por diferentes etiologías such as systemic hypotension, vasculitis, disseminated como la hipotensión sistémica, la vasculitis, el trom- INTRODUCTION 124 thromboembolism and celiac or mesenteric stenosis. boembolismo diseminado y la estenosis mesentérica We present a case of gastric ischemia due to critical o celíaca. Presentamos un caso de isquemia gástrica CASE REPORT 124 stenosis of the celiac artery treated using endovascular secundaria a estenosis crítica del tronco celíaco trata- DISCUSSION 125 therapy. The celiac artery is the first major branch of da endovascularmente. El tronco celíaco es la primera the abdominal aorta and provides some of the blood rama de la aorta abdominal y aporta gran parte del flujo REFERENCES 127 supply to the stomach through the left gastric artery de sangre al estómago a través de la arteria gástrica iz- and other organs like the spleen (splenic artery branch) quierda y de otros órganos como el bazo (a través de la and the liver. Although the collateral blood supply to rama esplénica) y el hígado. Aunque las colaterales que the stomach is protective, systemic hypotension or irrigan el estómago son protectoras, la hipotensión sis- occlusion of the main arteries, as in the case of our pa- témica o la oclusión de las principales ramas como en tient, may result in gastric ischemia.
    [Show full text]
  • Delayed Presentation of a Retained Fecalith
    Open Access Case Report DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15919 Delayed Presentation of a Retained Fecalith Fawwad A. Ansari 1 , Muhammad Ibraiz Bilal 1 , Muhammad Umer Riaz Gondal 1 , Mehwish Latif 2 , Nadeem Iqbal 2 1. Medicine, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK 2. Gastroenterology, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, PAK Corresponding author: Fawwad A. Ansari, [email protected] Abstract A fecalith is a common cause of acute appendicitis, and laparoscopic surgery is the mainstay of its management. Literature review shows that a fecalith may be retained in the gut following a laparoscopic appendectomy in some rare cases. In most cases, the fecalith becomes symptomatic with time due to the formation of an abscess, fistulous tract, or inflammation of the appendicular stump (stump appendicitis). We report a case of retained appendicular fecalith presenting with symptoms similar to acute appendicitis, 15 years after laparoscopic appendectomy. Categories: Gastroenterology, General Surgery Keywords: colonoscopy, acute appendicitis, appendectomy, fecalith, right iliac fossa pain, complications Introduction A fecalith is a hard stony mass of feces in the intestinal tract. Fecal impaction occurs when a large amount of fecal matter gets compacted and cannot get evacuated spontaneously [1]. In its extreme form, fecal impaction can lead to the formation of a fecalith due to the hardening of fecal material that forms a mass separate from other bowel contents [2]. It can occur in any part of the intestine [1]. Most often, a fecalith arises in the colon (mostly sigmoid) or rectum and very rarely in the small intestine [2]. Here we present a case of a retained appendicular fecalith in a patient who presented with an acute abdomen.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Abdomen
    Acute abdomen: Shaking down the Acute abdominal pain can be difficult to diagnose, requiring astute assessment skills and knowledge of abdominal anatomy 2.3 ANCC to discover its cause. We show you how to quickly and accurately CONTACT HOURS uncover the clues so your patient can get the help he needs. By Amy Wisniewski, BSN, RN, CCM Lehigh Valley Home Care • Allentown, Pa. The author has disclosed that she has no significant relationships with or financial interest in any commercial companies that pertain to this educational activity. NIE0110_124_CEAbdomen.qxd:Deepak 26/11/09 9:38 AM Page 43 suspects Determining the cause of acute abdominal rapidly, indicating a life-threatening process, pain is often complex due to the many or- so fast and accurate assessment is essential. gans in the abdomen and the fact that pain In this article, I’ll describe how to assess a may be nonspecific. Acute abdomen is a patient with acute abdominal pain and inter- general diagnosis, typically referring to se- vene appropriately. vere abdominal pain that occurs suddenly over a short period (usually no longer than What a pain! 7 days) and often requires surgical interven- Acute abdominal pain is one of the top tion. Symptoms may be severe and progress three symptoms of patients presenting in www.NursingMadeIncrediblyEasy.com January/February 2010 Nursing made Incredibly Easy! 43 NIE0110_124_CEAbdomen.qxd:Deepak 26/11/09 9:38 AM Page 44 the ED. Reasons for acute abdominal pain Visceral pain can be divided into three Your patient’s fall into six broad categories: subtypes: age may give • inflammatory—may be a bacterial cause, • tension pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Missed Appendicitis Diagnosis: a Case Report Jocelyn Cox, Bphed, DC1 Guy Sovak, Phd2
    ISSN 0008-3194 (p)/ISSN 1715-6181 (e)/2015/294–299/$2.00/©JCCA 2015 Missed appendicitis diagnosis: A case report Jocelyn Cox, BPhEd, DC1 Guy Sovak, PhD2 Objective: The purpose of this case report is to highlight Objectif : Cette étude de cas vise à souligner la nécessité and emphasize the need for an appropriate and thorough d’une liste appropriée et détaillée de diagnostics list of differential diagnoses when managing patients, as différentiels lors de la gestion des patients, car il n’est it is insufficient to assume cases are mechanical, until pas suffisant de supposer que les cas sont d’ordre proven non-mechanical. There are over 250,000 cases mécanique, jusqu’à la preuve du contraire. Il y a plus de of appendicitis annually in the United States. Of these 250 000 cas d’appendicite par an aux États-Unis. Parmi cases, <50% present with classic signs and symptoms of ces cas, < 50 % présentent des signes et des symptômes pain in the right lower quadrant, mild fever and nausea. classiques de douleur dans le quadrant inférieur droit, It is standard for patients who present with appendicitis de fièvre légère et de nausées. Il est normal qu’un to be managed operatively with a laparoscopic patient qui se présente avec une appendicite soit géré appendectomy within 24 hours, otherwise the risk of par une intervention chirurgicale (appendicectomie complications such as rupture, infection, and even death par laparoscopie) dans les 24 heures, sinon le risque increases dramatically. de complications, telles que rupture, infection et décès, Clinical Features: This is a retrospective case report augmente considérablement.
    [Show full text]
  • Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children
    Diagnostic Imaging Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Children Bearbeitet von Caroline KEYZER, Pierre Alain Gevenois 1. Auflage 2011. Buch. IX, 256 S. Hardcover ISBN 978 3 642 17871 9 Format (B x L): 19,3 x 26 cm Gewicht: 688 g Weitere Fachgebiete > Medizin > Sonstige Medizinische Fachgebiete > Radiologie, Bildgebende Verfahren Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. Clinical Presentation of Acute Appendicitis: Clinical Signs—Laboratory Findings—Clinical Scores, Alvarado Score and Derivate Scores David J. Humes and John Simpson Contents Abstract Appendicectomy is the most commonly performed 1 Clinical Presentation ............................................... 14 emergency operation worldwide with a lifetime risk 1.1 History........................................................................ 14 of appendicitis of 8.6% in males and 6.7% in 15 1.2 Examination ............................................................... females (Flum and Koepsell 2002; Addiss et al. 2 Laboratory Investigations....................................... 16 1990). The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is 3 Scoring Systems ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Hartmut Gross, M.D., FACEP
    Evaluation of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Hartmut Gross, M.D., FACEP Abdominal pain complaints comprise about 5% of all Emergency Department visits. The etiology of the pain may be any of a large number of processes. Many of these causes will be benign and self-limited, while others are medical urgencies or even surgical emergencies. As with any complaint in the ED, the worst diagnosis is always entertained first. Therefore, there is one thought, which the ED practitioner must maintain in the foreground of his mind: “Is there a life threatening process?” Etiology A breakdown of the most common diagnoses of abdominal pain presentations is listed below. Note that nearly half of the time, “unknown origin” is the diagnosis made. This is a perfectly acceptable conclusion, after a proper work-up has ruled out any life threatening illness. Common Diagnoses of Non-traumatic Abdominal Pain in the ED 1 Abdominal pain of unknown origin 41.3% 2 Gastroenteritis 6.9% 3 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease 6.7% 4 Urinary Tract Infection 5.2% 5 Ureteral Stone 4.3% 6 Appendicitis 4.3% 7 Acute Cholecystitis 2.5% 8 Intestinal Obstruction 2.5% 9 Constipation 2.3% 10 Duodenal Ulcer 2.0% 11 Dysmenorrhea 1.8% 12 Simple Pregnancy 1.8% 13 Pyelonephritis 1.7% 14 Gastritis 1.4% 15 Other 12.8% From Brewer, RJ., et al, Am J Surg 131: 219, 1976. Two important factors modify the differential diagnosis in patients who present with abdominal pain: sex and age. Other common diagnoses of abdominal pain in men and women are as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Acute Abdominal Pain in Children
    Clinical Acute Abdominal Pain in Children Urgent message: This article will guide you through the differential diagnosis, management and disposition of pediatric patients present- ing with acute abdominal pain. KAYLEENE E. PAGÁN CORREA, MD, FAAP Introduction y tummy hurts.” That is a simple statement that shows a common complaint from children who seek “M 1 care in an urgent care or emergency department. But the diagnosis in such patients can be challenging for a clinician because of the diverse etiologies. Acute abdominal pain is commonly caused by self-limiting con- ditions but also may herald serious medical or surgical emergencies, such as appendicitis. Making a timely diag- nosis is important to reduce the rate of complications but it can be challenging, particularly in infants and young children. Excellent history-taking skills accompanied by a careful, thorough physical exam are key to making the diagnosis or at least making a reasonable conclusion about a patient’s care.2 This article discusses the differential diagnosis for acute abdominal pain in children and offers guidance for initial evaluation and management of pediatric patients presenting with this complaint. © Getty Images Contrary to visceral pain, somatoparietal pain is well Pathophysiology localized, intense (sharp), and associated with one side Abdominal pain localization is confounded by the or the other because the nerves associated are numerous, nature of the pain receptors involved and may be clas- myelinated and transmit to a specific dorsal root ganglia. sified as visceral, somatoparietal, or referred pain. Vis- Somatoparietal pain receptors are principally located in ceral pain is not well localized because the afferent the parietal peritoneum, muscle and skin and usually nerves have fewer endings in the gut, are not myeli- respond to stretching, tearing or inflammation.
    [Show full text]