DOCSLIB.ORG

Solvation Entropy Made Simple Arxiv:1901.11128V1 [Physics.Chem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solvation Entropy Made Simple Arxiv:1901.11128V1 [Physics.Chem Solvation Entropy Made Simple Alejandro J. Garza∗ The Dow Chemical Company, 1776 Building Midland, Michigan 48674, United States E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The entropies of molecules in solution are routinely calculated using gas phase formulae. It is assumed that, because implicit solvation models are fitted to reproduce free energies, this is sufficient for modeling reactions in solution. However, this procedure exaggerates entropic effects in processes that change molecularity. Here, computationally efficient (i.e., having similar cost as gas phase entropy calculations) approximations for determining solvation entropy are proposed to address this issue. The S!, S, and Sα models are nonempirical and rely only on physical arguments and elementary properties of the medium (e.g., density and relative permittivity). For all three methods, average errors as compared to experiment are within chemical accuracy for 110 solvation entropies, 11 activation entropies in solution, and 32 vaporization enthalpies. The models also make predictions regarding microscopic and bulk properties of liquids which prove to be accurate. These results imply that ∆Hsol and ∆Ssol can be described separately and with less reliance on parametrization by a combination of the methods presented here with existing, reparametrized implicit solvation models. Introduction isfactory as it inevitably underestimates ∆Sreac effects and can result in unphysical negative It is standard practice in computational chem- free energy barriers (a recent publication10 dis- istry to calculate the free energy of molecules cusses this and related ad hoc methods to com- in solution utilizing gas phase entropies.1,2 Gas pute entropies in solution from entropies in the phase entropies are well described by analyti- gas phase). Another workaround is to scale gas cal formulas of statistical mechanics, but there phase entropies by a rule-of-thumb factor of ≈ is no similarly efficient way of estimating en- 0.65.1,11{14 While scaling gas phase entropies tropies in solution rigorously. However, the may be reasonable for small molecules, it is not use of gas phase entropies to model processes justified for larger molecules for which the vi- that change molecularity (e.g., adsorption and brational and cavity, rather than translational binding) in solution often exaggerates entropy and rotational, entropy terms dominate (there changes during the reaction, ∆S .1{8 In con- reac is no reason for which vibrations should change densed media, the translational and rotational arXiv:1901.11128v1 [physics.chem-ph] 30 Jan 2019 drastically upon solvation; numerical results motions of a molecule are hindered, reducing support this view15). Implicit solvation mod- the entropy as compared to the gas phase. Re- els are often fitted to reproduce experimental arrangement of the solvent to form a cavity for free energies under standard conditions,2,16{20 the solute further lowers the entropy of the sys- so one could expect them to improve ∆G . tem. The typical error in ∆S for bimolec- reac reac However, unless a model designed to account ular reactions in solution is so large that some for temperature effects is used and appropriate authors have suggested to completely neglect derivatives are taken (see, e.g., refs. 21,22), the translational and rotational entropy5,6 (or just fact that the T ∆S term in ∆G relies on the former9). This approach is, however, unsat- reac reac gas phase entropies will result in an incorrect 1 temperature dependence of the reaction. Fur- Theory thermore, in actual applications, implicit solva- The total entropy of an atom or molecule in tion models often do not improve the too-high solution is decomposed into contributions from binding free energies caused by the use of gas vibrations, translations, rotations, and the sol- phase entropies.1{9 Molecular dynamics and al- vent cavity: chemical free energy methods can in principle determine free energies in solution without re- S = Sv + St + Sr + Sc: (1) lying on gas phase formulas.23{25 Nonetheless, such calculations require significant additional The vibrational entropy can be computed from work from the user and are computationally de- the harmonic oscillator approximation in the manding, which makes them unsuitable for rou- same way as in the gas phase. It is well known, tine or high-throughput calculations. They also however, that this approximation yields un- suffer from inherent reproducibility issues due physically large contributions to the entropy to the sensitivity of Newtonian dynamics to ini- from low-frequency modes. To avoid this is- tial conditions and the lingering effects of such sue, Sv is calculated with the method proposed conditions if sampling is insufficient.24,25 by Grimme,26 which can be seen as a quasi hin- The purpose of this work is to formulate an dered rotor that interpolates between the har- efficient approximation for calculating molecu- monic oscillator and free rotor entropy formu- lar entropy in solution based only on physical las. One can, however, compute Sv with any ap- and geometric arguments. Three models, S!, proximation deemed appropriate as Sv does not S, and Sα, are derived that rely only on such influence solvation for the methods presented arguments|no empirically fitted parameters| here. and elementary solvent properties (e.g., mass density). The methods differ only in how the Translational Entropy cavitation entropy is calculated: S!, S, and Sα utilize, respectively, the Pitzer acentric fac- The contributions from St in terms of the trans- 27,28 tor (!), the relative permittivity (r), and r lational partition function are as well as the isobaric thermal expansion coef- @ ln (q ) ficient (α). This establishes a connection be- S = k ln (q ) + k + kT t ; (2) t t @T tween ! (a microscopic property), r, and α V (macroscopic properties). The cost of evaluat- where q is approximated by the familiar ex- ing entropy with these models is comparable to t pression obtained from the eigenenergies of a the cost of calculating gas phase entropies with particle of mass m confined in a volume V : the ideal gas/rigid rotor/harmonic approxima- tion. Their accuracy is tested by constructing 2πmkT 3=2 a database of 110 experimental solvation en- qt = V: (3) h2 tropies and 11 activation entropies in solution; the resulting average errors are in the range of All quantities in eq. 3 are unambiguously de- 2{3 cal/mol-K, which is comparable to the ac- fined except for V . For an ideal gas V = kT=P , curacy of gas phase entropies and within what is but in condensed media V will depend on prop- considered chemical accuracy (≤ 1 kcal/mol at erties of the medium such as, e.g., its density 300 K). Additionally, the models make testable and particle volume. Here, we define V in terms predictions regarding molecular and bulk prop- of the volume of the solute cavity, vc, as well as erties of liquids that prove to be in agreement the average number of accessible cavities Nc, with experiment. V = Ncvc; (4) so that we can evaluate V based on a physical interpretation of Nc and vc. In our model, vc is 2 the volume of a sphere with a radius equal to Typically, Nc ≈ 1, but the hopping terms can the sum of the spherical equivalent radii of the be important in cases of small solutes in bulky solute and the volume of free space per solvent or low density solvents. Note that previous particle. This definition is equivalent to works have also utilized a cavity volume to 30 determine St. However, the definition of vc 3 1=3 1=3 and consideration of the possibility of hopping vc = VM + Vfree (5) distinguish the present approach from previous with ones. S Mw Although we have written in eq. 1 separate Vfree = − VS; (6) NAρ terms for St, Sr, and Sc, these are actually in- tertwined. As we see next, the definition of St where VS/M is the volume of a solvent/solute molecule, ρ the mass density of the medium, is important to determine Sr, and Sr is in turn used to derive an approximation for Sc. The NA Avogadro's number, and Mw the molec- ular weight (throughout this document, sub- way to think about St to more easily under- scripts/superscripts \M" and \S" denote solute stand Sr as conceptualized here is simply as the entropy of a point particle in a box, as opposed and solvent, respectively). Here, VM and VS are determined from van der Waals radii,29 though to the entropy of an object that has rotations. vc is relatively insensitive to how molecular vol- umes are defined (vide infra). Rotational Entropy To determine Nc, we define the probability We define Sr in terms of the contributions from per solvent particle of \hopping" to an adjacent the rigid rotor approximation and the transla- cavity, x, based on the solvent, solute, and free tional entropy lost by virtue of acquiring a gyra- volumes as tion radius while being confined to V = Ncvc. 2=3 2=3 Assuming that rotation is fast, the radius rc maxfVfree − VM ; 0g x = 2=3 2=3 : (7) of the cavity in which the centroid of a linear Vfree + VS or spherically symmetric rigid rotor can move That is, the solute can only hop if the cross freely is effectively reduced by its radius of gy- ration rg, sectional area of VM is smaller than Vfree (given that all cross sectional areas are defined Natoms identically in terms of volume, regardless of 2 1 X 2 rg = (rk − rmean) : (10) Natoms shape). Furthermore, assuming effective spher- k=1 ical shapes for each volume and introducing 1=3 For nonsymmetric rotors, the reduction by of rc = [3vc=(4π)] as the radius of the cavity, there will be rc by rg is also assumed as an averaged radius is necessary to preserve rotational invariance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organic Chemistry –II
    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title Paper 5: Organic Chemistry –II Module No and Title Module 5: Methods of determining mechanisms and Isotope effects Module Tag CHE_P5_M5_e-Text CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 5: Organic Chemistry -II MODULE No. 5: Methods of determining mechanisms and Isotope effects TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Learning Outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Methods of determining mechanism 3.1 Determination of the products formed 3.2 Study of Intermediate formed 3.3 Study of catalyst 3.4 Stereochemical Evidence 3.5 Kinetic evidence 3.6 Isotope Labelling 4. Isotopic Effects 5. Summary CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 5: Organic Chemistry -II MODULE No. 5: Methods of determining mechanisms and Isotope effects 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module, you shall be able to • Know what do we mean by mechanism of a reaction • Learn the ways to determine mechanism of a reaction • Identify the reactants, products and intermediates involved in a reaction • Evaluate the steps involved in a reaction 2. Introduction In scientific experiments and chemical reactions, all we can do is try to account for the observations by proposing theories and mechanisms. Reaction mechanisms have been an integral part of the teaching of organic chemistry and in the planning of routes for organic syntheses for about 50 years. The first sentence of Hammett’s influential book, Physical Organic Chemistry, states, “A major part of the job of the chemist is the prediction and control of the course of chemical reactions” In a chemical reaction, mechanism depicts the actual process by which the reaction has taken place. It indicates which bonds are broken, in what order, the steps involved and the relative rate of each step.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvent Effects on Structure and Reaction Mechanism: a Theoretical Study of [2 + 2] Polar Cycloaddition Between Ketene and Imine
    J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7877-7881 7877 Solvent Effects on Structure and Reaction Mechanism: A Theoretical Study of [2 + 2] Polar Cycloaddition between Ketene and Imine Thanh N. Truong Henry Eyring Center for Theoretical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 ReceiVed: March 25, 1998; In Final Form: July 17, 1998 The effects of aqueous solvent on structures and mechanism of the [2 + 2] cycloaddition between ketene and imine were investigated by using correlated MP2 and MP4 levels of ab initio molecular orbital theory in conjunction with the dielectric continuum Generalized Conductor-like Screening Model (GCOSMO) for solvation. We found that reactions in the gas phase and in aqueous solution have very different topology on the free energy surfaces but have similar characteristic motion along the reaction coordinate. First, it involves formation of a planar trans-conformation zwitterionic complex, then a rotation of the two moieties to form the cycloaddition product. Aqueous solvent significantly stabilizes the zwitterionic complex, consequently changing the topology of the free energy surface from a gas-phase single barrier (one-step) process to a double barrier (two-step) one with a stable intermediate. Electrostatic solvent-solute interaction was found to be the dominant factor in lowering the activation energy by 4.5 kcal/mol. The present calculated results are consistent with previous experimental data. Introduction Lim and Jorgensen have also carried out free energy perturbation (FEP) theory simulations with accurate force field that includes + [2 2] cycloaddition reactions are useful synthetic routes to solute polarization effects and found even much larger solvent - formation of four-membered rings.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvents and Solvent E¤Ects in Organic Chemistry
    Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................... 1 2 Solute-Solvent Interactions ........................................... 7 2.1 Solutions . .......................................................... 7 2.2 Intermolecular Forces . ............................................ 12 2.2.1 Ion-Dipole Forces . ................................................. 13 2.2.2 Dipole-Dipole Forces................................................ 14 2.2.3 Dipole-Induced Dipole Forces ....................................... 15 2.2.4 Instantaneous Dipole-Induced Dipole Forces . ...................... 16 2.2.5 Hydrogen Bonding . ................................................. 17 2.2.6 Electron-Pair Donor/Electron-Pair Acceptor Interactions (EPD/EPA Interactions) . ..................................................... 23 2.2.7 Solvophobic Interactions ............................................ 31 2.3 Solvation . .......................................................... 34 2.4 Preferential Solvation................................................ 43 2.5 Micellar Solvation (Solubilization) ................................... 48 2.6 Ionization and Dissociation . ........................................ 52 3 Classification of Solvents ............................................. 65 3.1 Classification of Solvents according to Chemical Constitution ......... 65 3.2 Classification of Solvents using Physical Constants . .................. 75 3.3 Classification of Solvents in Terms of Acid-Base Behaviour. ......... 88 3.3.1 Brønsted-Lowry
    [Show full text]
  • Diastereoisomers As Probes for Solvent Reorganizational Effects On
    Chemical Physics 324 (2006) 8–25 www.elsevier.com/locate/chemphys Diastereoisomers as probes for solvent reorganizational effects on IVCT in dinuclear ruthenium complexes Deanna M. DÕAlessandro, F. Richard Keene * Department of Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld. 4811, Australia Received 19 June 2005; accepted 1 September 2005 Available online 3 October 2005 Abstract 5+ 0 0 IVCT solvatochromism studies on the meso and rac diastereoisomers of [{Ru(bpy)2}2(l-bpm)] (bpy = 2,2 -bipyridine; bpm = 2,2 - bipyrimidine) in a homologous series of nitrile solvents revealed that stereochemically directed specific solvent effects in the first solvation shell dominated the outer sphere contribution to the reorganizational energy for intramolecular electron transfer. Further, solvent pro- portion experiments in acetonitrile/propionitrile mixtures indicated that the magnitude and direction of the specific effect was dependent on the relative abilities of discrete solvent molecules to penetrate the clefts between the planes of the terminal polypyridyl ligands. In particular, the specific effects were dependent on the dimensionality of the clefts, and the number, size, orientation and location of the solvent dipoles within the interior and exterior clefts. 5+ 5+ IVCT solvatochromism studies on the diastereoisomeric forms of [{Ru(bpy)2}2(l-dbneil)] and [{Ru(pp)2}2(l-bpm)] {dbneil = dibenzoeilatin; pp = substituted derivatives of 2,20-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline} revealed that the subtle and systematic changes in the nature of the clefts by the variation of the bridging ligand, and the judicious positioning of substituents on the terminal ligands, profoundly influenced the magnitude of the reorganizational energy contribution to the electron transfer barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvent Effects on the Thermodynamic Functions of Dissociation of Anilines and Phenols
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 1954-2016 University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1982 Solvent effects on the thermodynamic functions of dissociation of anilines and phenols Barkat A. Khawaja University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Khawaja, Barkat A., Solvent effects on the thermodynamic functions of dissociation of anilines and phenols, Master of Science thesis, Department of Chemistry, University of Wollongong, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvation Structure of Ions in Water
    International Journal of Thermophysics, Vol. 28, No. 2, April 2007 (© 2007) DOI: 10.1007/s10765-007-0154-6 Solvation Structure of Ions in Water Raymond D. Mountain1 Molecular dynamics simulations of ions in water are reported for solutions of varying solute concentration at ambient conditions for six cations and four anions in 10 solutes. The solutes were selected to show trends in properties as the size and charge density of the ions change. The emphasis is on how the structure of water is modified by the presence of the ions and how many water molecules are present in the first solvation shell of the ions. KEY WORDS: anion; cation; molecular dynamics; potential functions; solva- tion; water. 1. INTRODUCTION The behavior of aqueous solutions of salts is a topic of continuing interest [1–3]. In this note we examine how the structure of water,as reflected in the oxy- gen–oxygen pair function, is modified as the concentration of ions increases. The method of generating the pair functions is molecular dynamics using the SPC/E model for water [4] and various models for ion–water interactions taken from the literature. The solutes are LiCl, NaCl, KCl, RbCl, NaF, CaCl2, CaSO4,Na2SO4, NaNO3, and guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) [C(NH2)3Cl]. This work is an extension of earlier work [5] to a larger set of ions. The water molecules and ions interact through site–site pair interac- tions consisting of Lennard–Jones potentials and Coulomb interactions so that the interaction between a pair of sites labeled i, j and separated by an interatomic distance r is 12 6 φij (r) = 4ij (σij /r) − (σij /r) + qiqj /r (1) where qi is the charge on site i.
    [Show full text]
  • Affinity of Small-Molecule Solutes to Hydrophobic, Hydrophilic, and Chemically Patterned Interfaces in Aqueous Solution
    Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution Jacob I. Monroea, Sally Jiaoa, R. Justin Davisb, Dennis Robinson Browna, Lynn E. Katzb, and M. Scott Shella,1 aDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; and bDepartment of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 Edited by Peter J. Rossky, Rice University, Houston, TX, and approved November 17, 2020 (received for review September 30, 2020) Performance of membranes for water purification is highly influ- However, a molecular understanding that links membrane enced by the interactions of solvated species with membrane surface chemistry to solute affinity and hence membrane func- surfaces, including surface adsorption of solutes upon fouling. tional properties remains incomplete, due in part to the complex Current efforts toward fouling-resistant membranes often pursue interplay among specific interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonds, surface hydrophilization, frequently motivated by macroscopic electrostatics, dispersion) and molecular morphology (e.g., sur- measures of hydrophilicity, because hydrophobicity is thought to face and polymer configurations) that are difficult to disentangle increase solute–surface affinity. While this heuristic has driven di- (11–14). Chemically heterogeneous surfaces are even less un- verse membrane functionalization strategies, here we build on derstood but can affect fouling in complex ways.
    [Show full text]
  • S.T.E.T.Women's College, Mannargudi Semester Iii Ii M
    S.T.E.T.WOMEN’S COLLEGE, MANNARGUDI SEMESTER III II M.Sc., CHEMISTRY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY - II – P16CH31 UNIT I Aliphatic nucleophilic substitution – mechanisms – SN1, SN2, SNi – ion-pair in SN1 mechanisms – neighbouring group participation, non-classical carbocations – substitutions at allylic and vinylic carbons. Reactivity – effect of structure, nucleophile, leaving group and stereochemical factors – correlation of structure with reactivity – solvent effects – rearrangements involving carbocations – Wagner-Meerwein and dienone-phenol rearrangements. Aromatic nucleophilic substitutions – SN1, SNAr, Benzyne mechanism – reactivity orientation – Ullmann, Sandmeyer and Chichibabin reaction – rearrangements involving nucleophilic substitution – Stevens – Sommelet Hauser and von-Richter rearrangements. NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION Mechanism of Aliphatic Nucleophilic Substitution. Aliphatic nucleophilic substitution clearly involves the donation of a lone pair from the nucleophile to the tetrahedral, electrophilic carbon bonded to a halogen. For that reason, it attracts to nucleophile In organic chemistry and inorganic chemistry, nucleophilic substitution is a fundamental class of reactions in which a leaving group(nucleophile) is replaced by an electron rich compound(nucleophile). The whole molecular entity of which the electrophile and the leaving group are part is usually called the substrate. The nucleophile essentially attempts to replace the leaving group as the primary substituent in the reaction itself, as a part of another molecule. The most general form of the reaction may be given as the following: Nuc: + R-LG → R-Nuc + LG: The electron pair (:) from the nucleophile(Nuc) attacks the substrate (R-LG) forming a new 1 bond, while the leaving group (LG) departs with an electron pair. The principal product in this case is R-Nuc. The nucleophile may be electrically neutral or negatively charged, whereas the substrate is typically neutral or positively charged.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleophilic Substitution and Elimination Reactions
    8 NUCLEOPHILIC SUBSTITUTION AND ELIMINATION REACTIONS substitution reactions involve the replacement of one atom or group (X) by another (Y): We already have described one very important type of substitution reaction, the halogenation of alkanes (Section 4-4), in which a hydrogen atom is re- placed by a halogen atom (X = H, Y = halogen). The chlorination of 2,2- dimethylpropane is an example: CH3 CH3 I I CH3-C-CH3 + C12 light > CH3-C-CH2Cl + HCI I I Reactions of this type proceed by radical-chain mechanisms in which the bonds are broken and formed by atoms or radicals as reactive intermediates. This 8-1 Classification of Reagents as Electrophiles and Nucleophiles. Acids and Bases mode of bond-breaking, in which one electron goes with R and the other with X, is called homolytic bond cleavage: R 'i: X + Y. - X . + R : Y a homolytic substitution reaction There are a large number of reactions, usually occurring in solution, that do not involve atoms or radicals but rather involve ions. They occur by heterolytic cleavage as opposed to homolytic cleavage of el~ctron-pairbonds. In heterolytic bond cleavage, the electron pair can be considered to go with one or the other of the groups R and X when the bond is broken. As one ex- ample, Y is a group such that it has an unshared electron pair and also is a negative ion. A heterolytic substitution reaction in which the R:X bonding pair goes with X would lead to RY and :X? R~:X+ :YO --' :x@+ R :Y a heterolytic substitution reaction A specific substitution reaction of this type is that of chloromethane with hydroxide ion to form methanol: In this chapter, we shall discuss substitution reactions that proceed by ionic or polar mechanisms' in which the bonds cleave heterolytically.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEMICAL KINETICS Pt 2 Reaction Mechanisms Reaction Mechanism
    Reaction Mechanism (continued) CHEMICAL The reaction KINETICS 2 C H O +→5O + 6CO 4H O Pt 2 3 4 3 2 2 2 • has many steps in the reaction mechanism. Objectives ! Be able to describe the collision and Reaction Mechanisms transition-state theories • Even though a balanced chemical equation ! Be able to use the Arrhenius theory to may give the ultimate result of a reaction, determine the activation energy for a reaction and to predict rate constants what actually happens in the reaction may take place in several steps. ! Be able to relate the molecularity of the reaction and the reaction rate and • This “pathway” the reaction takes is referred to describle the concept of the “rate- as the reaction mechanism. determining” step • The individual steps in the larger overall reaction are referred to as elementary ! Be able to describe the role of a catalyst and homogeneous, heterogeneous and reactions. enzyme catalysis Reaction Mechanisms Often Used Terms •Intermediate: formed in one step and used up in a subsequent step and so is never seen as a product. The series of steps by which a chemical reaction occurs. •Molecularity: the number of species that must collide to produce the reaction indicated by that A chemical equation does not tell us how step. reactants become products - it is a summary of the overall process. •Elementary Step: A reaction whose rate law can be written from its molecularity. •uni, bi and termolecular 1 Elementary Reactions Elementary Reactions • Consider the reaction of nitrogen dioxide with • Each step is a singular molecular event carbon monoxide.
    [Show full text]
  • Elimination Reactions Are Described
    Introduction In this module, different types of elimination reactions are described. From a practical standpoint, elimination reactions widely used for the generation of double and triple bonds in compounds from a saturated precursor molecule. The presence of a good leaving group is a prerequisite in most elimination reactions. Traditional classification of elimination reactions, in terms of the molecularity of the reaction is employed. How the changes in the nature of the substrate as well as reaction conditions affect the mechanism of elimination are subsequently discussed. The stereochemical requirements for elimination in a given substrate and its consequence in the product stereochemistry is emphasized. ELIMINATION REACTIONS Objective and Outline beta-eliminations E1, E2 and E1cB mechanisms Stereochemical considerations of these reactions Examples of E1, E2 and E1cB reactions Alpha eliminations and generation of carbene I. Basics Elimination reactions involve the loss of fragments or groups from a molecule to generate multiple bonds. A generalized equation is shown below for 1,2-elimination wherein the X and Y from two adjacent carbon atoms are removed, elimination C C C C -XY X Y Three major types of elimination reactions are: α-elimination: two atoms or groups are removed from the same atom. It is also known as 1,1-elimination. H R R C X C + HX R Both H and X are removed from carbon atom here R Carbene β-elimination: loss of atoms or groups on adjacent atoms. It is also H H known as 1,2- elimination. R C C R R HC CH R X H γ-elimination: loss of atoms or groups from the 1st and 3rd positions as shown below.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Ionic Reactions-Nucleophilic Substitution
    Introduction ÎThe polarity of a carbon-halogen bond leads to the carbon having a partial positive charge + In alkyl halides this polarity causes the carbon to become activated to substitution reactions with nucleophiles Chapter 6 Ionic Reactions-Nucleophilic ÎCarbon-halogen bonds get less polar, longer and weaker in going Substitution and Elimination Reactions from fluorine to iodine of Alkyl Halides Chapter 6 2 Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution General Features of Nucleophilic Substitution • Three components are necessary in any substitution reaction. The Polar Carbon-Halogen Bond Chapter 6 3 Chapter 6 4 1 Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution General Features of Nucleophilic Substitution General Features of Nucleophilic Substitution • Negatively charged nucleophiles like HO¯ and HS¯ are used as • Furthermore, when the substitution product bears a positive salts with Li+, Na+, or K+ counterions to balance the charge. charge and also contains a proton bonded to O or N, the initially Since the identity of the counterion is usually inconsequential, it formed substitution product readily loses a proton in a is often omitted from the chemical equation. BrØnsted-Lowry acid-base reaction, forming a neutral product. • When a neutral nucleophile is used, the substitution product bears a positive charge. Chapter 6 5 Chapter 6 6 Leaving Groups The Nucleophile A leaving group is a substituent that can leave as a relatively A nucleophile may be any molecule with an unshared electron pair stable entity It can either leave as an anion…. …or as a neutral molecule We’ll discuss later what makes a nucleophile strong or weak (good or bad) Chapter 6 7 Chapter 6 8 2 Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution Alkyl Halides and Nucleophilic Substitution The Leaving Group The Leaving Group • In a nucleophilic substitution reaction of R—X, the C—X bond is heterolytically cleaved, and the leaving group departs with the electron pair in that bond, forming X:¯.
    [Show full text]