DOCSLIB.ORG

Safety Considerations for Operation of Uavs in the NAS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safety Considerations for Operation of Uavs in the NAS SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM Roland E. Weibel and R. John Hansman Report No. ICAT-2005-1 March 2005 MIT International Center for Air Transportation Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 USA 2 SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR OPERATION OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES IN THE NATIONAL AIRSPACE SYSTEM by Roland E. Weibel and R. John Hansman Abstract There is currently a broad effort underway in the United States and internationally by several organizations to craft regulations enabling the safe operation of UAVs in the NAS. Current federal regulations governing unmanned aircraft are limited in scope, and the lack of regulations is a barrier to achieving the full potential benefit of UAV operations. To inform future FAA regulations, an investigation of the safety considerations for UAV operation in the NAS was performed. Key issues relevant to operations in the NAS, including performance and operating architecture were examined, as well as current rules and regulations governing unmanned aircraft. In integrating UAV operations in the NAS, it will be important to consider the implications of different levels of vehicle control and autonomous capability and the source of traffic surveillance in the system. A system safety analysis was performed according to FAA system safety guidelines for two critical hazards in UAV operation: midair collision and ground impact. Event-based models were developed describing the likelihood of ground fatalities and midair collisions under several assumptions. From the models, a risk analysis was performed calculating the expected level of safety for each hazard without mitigation. The variation of expected level of safety was determined based on vehicle characteristics and population density for the ground impact hazard, and traffic density for midair collisions. The results of the safety analysis indicate that it may be possible to operate small UAVs with few operational and size restrictions over the majority of the United States. As UAV mass increases, mitigation measures must be utilized to further reduce both ground impact and midair collision risks to target levels from FAA guidance. It is in the public interest to achieve the full benefits of UAV operations, while still preserving safety through effective mitigation of risks with the least possible restrictions. Therefore, a framework was presented under which several potential mitigation measures were introduced and could be evaluated. It is likely that UAVs will be significant users of the future NAS, and this report provides an analytical basis for evaluating future regulatory decisions. This document is based on the thesis of Roland E. Weibel submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics. 3 4 Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Presidential Fellows program at MIT, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration/ Federal Aviation Administration Joint University Program under grant number SAA-95-G-017. The authors wish to thank the participants in the program for providing valuable feedback and advice. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Jim Kuchar at MIT Lincoln Labs, Phil Potter of the FAA, Matt DeGarmo at MITRE, Ryan Schaeffer at SRA International, and Dr. John Appleby of Aurora Flight Sciences for providing guidance and insight from within the UAV field. Thanks to Alex Mozdzanowska, Philippe Bonnefoy, Laura Major Forest, Helen Jiang, Tom & Hayley Reynolds, and Jonathan Histon of MIT’s International Center for Air Transportation for technical insight and support. 5 6 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 15 1.1 Objective..........................................................................................................15 1.2 Motivation........................................................................................................15 1.3 Approach..........................................................................................................18 2 Background 19 2.1 Expanding Role of Military UAV Operations.................................................19 2.2 Effort Toward Civil UAV Operations .............................................................21 3 Key Issues in UAV Operations in the NAS 23 3.1 NAS Overview.................................................................................................23 3.1.1 Visual and Instrument Flight Rules .....................................................24 3.1.2 Airspace Classifications.......................................................................24 3.2 Air Traffic Management System .....................................................................26 3.2.1 Current System.....................................................................................26 3.2.2 General UAV System ..........................................................................27 3.2.3 Potential UAV Architectures ...............................................................28 3.2.4 Architectures of Example UAV Operations ........................................32 3.3 UAV Performance Capabilities .......................................................................35 3.3.1 Potential Classifications.......................................................................36 3.3.2 Performance Analysis..........................................................................37 3.4 Representative Aircraft for Classification .......................................................40 4 Regulatory Bases for Civil Operation of Unmanned Aircraft 43 4.1 Legal Basis for FAA Regulation of Aircraft....................................................44 4.2 Mechanisms for Safety Regulation..................................................................46 4.3 Current Unmanned Aircraft Rules...................................................................47 4.3.1 Model Aircraft.....................................................................................47 4.3.2 Moored Balloons, Kites, Unmanned Rockets, and Unmanned Free Balloons ...........................................................................................................49 4.3.3 Certificate of Authorization .................................................................51 4.4 Conclusions......................................................................................................52 7 5 System Safety Analysis 53 5.1 Risk Assessment Methodology........................................................................53 5.1.1 Severity Classifications........................................................................55 5.1.2 Likelihood of Occurrence....................................................................57 5.2 Empirical Levels of Risk .................................................................................58 5.2.1 Ground Fatalities..................................................................................58 5.2.2 Midair Collisions.................................................................................61 5.3 UAV Risk Analysis Approach.........................................................................62 6 Ground Impact Hazard Analysis 65 6.1 Ground Impact Model......................................................................................65 6.2 Model Limitations............................................................................................67 6.3 Model Application ...........................................................................................68 6.4 Results..............................................................................................................69 6.5 Conclusions......................................................................................................74 7 Midair Collision Hazard Analysis 77 7.1 Collision Rate Formulation..............................................................................77 7.2 Data Source......................................................................................................79 7.3 Average Midair Collision Risk over the United States....................................79 7.4 Airway Structure..............................................................................................80 7.4.1 Regions Investigated............................................................................81 7.4.2 Data Transformation ............................................................................82 7.5 Midair Collision Risk in the Vicinity Airways................................................82 7.5.1 Jet Routes.............................................................................................82 7.5.2 Victor Airways.....................................................................................85 7.6 Conclusions......................................................................................................87 8 Ground Impact and Midair Collision Risk Mitigation 89 8.1 Need for Mitigation..........................................................................................89 8.2 Risk Mitigation Strategies................................................................................89 8.2.1 Possible Mitigation Measures of Ground Impact Risk........................89 8.2.2 Possible Mitigation Measures of Midair Collision Risk......................91
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Designing Unmanned Aircraft Systems: a Comprehensive Approach
    Designing Unmanned Aircraft Systems: A Comprehensive Approach Jay Gundlach Aurora Flight Sciences Manassas, Virginia AIAA EDUCATION SERIES Joseph A. Schetz, Editor-in-Chief Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg, Virginia Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191-4344 NOMENCLATURE Item Definition A area; availability; ground area covered in a mission; radar antenna area, m2; conversion between radians and minutes of arc Aa achieved availability Abound bounded area for a closed section 2 Ad IR detector sensitive area, m 2 Aeff effective antenna area, length Ai inherent availability AO operational availability; UA availability 2 Ap propeller disk area, length ARate area coverage rate Ar effective collection area of optical receiver ASurf surface area AR aspect ratio ARWet wetted aspect ratio AR0 aspect ratio along spanwise path a UA acceleration; maximum fuselage cross-section width; speed of sound; detector characteristic dimension awa radar mainlobe width metric awr radar mainlobe width metric ax acceleration along the x direction (acceleration) B acuity gain due to binoculars; boom area; effective noise bandwidth of receiving process, Hz 21 BDoppler Doppler bandwidth (time ) BN effective noise bandwidth of the receiving process 21 BT radar signal bandwidth (time ) BSFCSL brake specific fuel consumption at sea level b web length; wing span; maximum fuselage cross- section height bw wing span b0 span without dihedral C cost of contractor
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 2005, Accessed Oct
    i National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ikhana Unmanned Aircraft System Western States Fire Missions Peter W. Merlin National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Office Washington, D.C. 2009 ii Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Merlin, Peter W., 1964- Ikhana Unmanned Aircraft System : Western States fire missions / by Peter W. Merlin. p. cm. “August 2009.” 1. Aeronautics in forest fire control--West (U.S.) 2. Aerial photography in forestry--West (U.S.) 3. Drone aircraft. 4. Predator (Drone aircraft) 5. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. I. Title. SD421.43.M47 2009 634.9’6180978--dc22 iii Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. IV Preface ...................................................................................................................................................V Introduction .......................................................................................................................................VII Chapter One ...........................................................................................................................................1 Don’t Fear the Reaper Chapter Two .........................................................................................................................................19 Chariots of Fire Chapter Three .......................................................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • An Unmanned Aircraft System for Maritime Search and Rescue
    An Unmanned Aircraft System for Maritime Search and Rescue by Andre Paul Meredith Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof Thomas Jones Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering March 2011 Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2011 Copyright © 2011 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Abstract Search and Rescue is an essential service provided by States and Militaries to search for, locate and rescue survivors of accidents and incidents. Civil Search and Rescue utilizes a system of well-trained professionals or volunteers, an effective Search and Rescue organization, supported by industry and other providers of infrastructure and assets. The service is rendered to save the lives of civilian individuals in imminent danger of losing their lives. Military (Combat) Search and Rescue is provided by militaries to save the lives of military practitioners in a similar predicament. In addition, Search and Rescue is performed over land and over the sea. All forms of Search and Rescue rely on capable, specialized assets for efficiency en affectivity. Assets are specified and chosen on the grounds of various factors, amongst others operating environment, operational profile, performance and special abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: Tecnologie E Prospettive Future
    Alma Mater Studiorum · Università di Bologna SCUOLA DI SCIENZE Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Informatica Unmanned Aerial Vehicle: tecnologie e prospettive future Relatore: Presentata da: Luciano Bononi Marcello Allegretti Correlatore: Giampiero Giacomello Sessione II Anno Accademico 2015 - 2016 Quale è la vera vittoria? – Quella su se stessi Prima regola dell’Aikido Abstract Partendo dalla definizione di UAV e UAS, arrivando a quella di drone, nella tesi saranno definiti i termini precedenti, ossia un sistema aereo senza pilota a bordo, la nascita del termine drone e le tendenze attuali. Dopo una precisa classificazione nelle quattro categorie principali (droni per hobbisti, commerciali e militari di me- dia grandezza, militari specifici di grandi dimensioni e stealth da combattimento) saranno descritti gli ambiti di utilizzo: da un lato quello militare e della sicurez- za, dall’altro quello civile e scientifico. I capitoli centrali della tesi saranno il cuore dell’opera: l’architettura dell’UAV sarà descritta analizzando la totalità delle sue componenti, sia hardware che software. Verranno, quindi, analizzati i problemi re- lativi alla sicurezza, focalizzandosi sull’hacking di un UAV, illustrandone le varie tecniche e contromisure (tra cui anche come nascondersi da un drone). Il lavoro della tesi prosegue nei capitoli successivi con un’attenta trattazione della normativa vigente e dell’etica dei droni (nonché del diritto ad uccidere con tali sistemi). Il capitolo relativo alla tecnologia stealth sarà importante per capire le modalità di occultamento, le tendenze attuali e i possibili sviluppi futuri degli UAV militari da combattimento. Il capitolo finale sugli sviluppi futuri esporrà le migliorie tecno- logiche e gli obiettivi degli UAV negli anni a venire, insieme ad eventuali utilizzi sia militari che civili.
    [Show full text]
  • RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper
    RQ-1 Predator/MQ-9 Reaper Unmanned Aerial Vehicles June 2020 Program Briefing The RQ-1A Predator was the US Air Force’s first medium endurance UAV. The Predator stemmed from the CIA's earlier Tier 1 Medium En- durance Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (MAE-UAV) that was deployed for surveillance missions over the for- mer Yugoslavia in 1993-94. It was based on the General Atomics Gnat for research purposes. In its hunter- The Predator is a contender in a vari- 750 air vehicle. killer version for the Air Force, it is ety of foreign competitions; the The upgraded version, the Gnat- designated as the MQ-9A Reaper. Netherlands and Spain have been 750-TE Predator won the DoD’s Tier The Air Force had been acquiring the cleared for sales. General Atomics 2 competition with a development MQ-9A alongside the MQ-1A Pred- has developed the Predator-XP ex- award in January 1994 and in 1997 ator but in 2009 decided to shift en- port variant to make it more suitable was redesignated as the RQ-1A Pred- tirely to the Reaper. Procurement for export and likely candidates in- ator. The Predator was first deployed through FY11 was 130 air vehicles. clude the UAE and Saudi Arabia. over Bosnia in the summer of 1995. Under the FY21 budget plan, the General Atomics and Lockheed The US Air Force assumed opera- USAF objective is 419 aircraft with Martin teamed to offer a derivative of tional control of the Predator on 2 new procurement continuing through the Predator called the Mariner September 1996.
    [Show full text]